DOCSLIB.ORG

King Lear: Background AP English Lit Timeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King Lear: Background AP English Lit Timeline King Lear: Background AP English Lit Timeline: Francis Bacon’s King Lear Shakespeare Shakespeare written (1603- dies. (Galileo is New Elizabeth I is born. 1606); prohibited from Atlantis assumes (Galileo also published in further scientific published the throne born.) 1608. work.) (posthumo usly) ____________________________________ 1627 1636 1558 1564 1605 1613 1616 1644 Globe 1619 Harvard Theatre 1st African University Globe Theatre 1598 burns and is slaves established is demolished brought to Shakespeare’s 1603 rebuilt in the US by Puritans. son Hamnet Virginia Queen Elizabeth dies; King dies. James I takes the throne. King Lear (written between 1603-06) Setting: Ancient Britain Source: Holinshead Chronicles --Raphael Holinshed’s The Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland (1577). As was his general habit, Shakespeare borrowed his two plots from previous sources. Holinshed reported in his Chronicles a story that dates back as far as 1136 in which a supposedly real King Leir who ruled England around 800 BC divides his kingdom between two of his daughters, disowning the third for failing his love test, who Fig.2 nevertheless marries the King of France. Fig.1 Abused thereafter by the successful daughters, Leir goes to France, unites with his third daughter and her husband, and regains his throne by military force. The story took many shapes and variations, including a history play produced before 1595 in which the daughters actually try to murder Leir. The Edmund story came from Sidney’s Arcadia (a romance with pastoral elements). In both cases Shakespeare made radical changes. Fig. 3 • On 26th December 1606, the King’s Men performed the play at court for King James. Far from dividing his kingdom, James was busily trying to unite two sovereign realms, England and Scotland, and in so doing, creating a new concept of nation, calling it Great Britain. • Even the play’s first line, ‘I thought the king had more affected the Duke of Albany than Cornwall’, had a special point when spoken before an Fig. 4 audience that may well have included both dukes, titles King James had conferred on his sons. • The play’s resonances with the current monarch have often been troubling: during King George III’s bouts of madness the play was not performed in London. Fig. 5 • Described alternately as Shakespeare’s “Everest”, and his deepest plunge into the human soul. • Questions the difference between sanity and insanity, between order and chaos. • One sentence plot summary: Lear tries to control his daughters and ends up losing them all. • Shakespeare intentionally set KL in pre- Christian Britain so that the tragic ending could not be explained away as the will of a loving God. Fig. 6 Characters: King Lear • Aging king of Britain • Used to having absolute power Fig. 7 • Doesn’t respond well to being contradicted or challenged • Wishes to maintain the power of a king while unburdening himself of the responsibility. Fool • Highly intelligent, he uses his wit to criticize Lear and plead with Fig. 8 the king to right the wrongs Lear has done to others and himself. Cordelia • Lear’s youngest daughter • Refuses to flatter her father; is disowned by Lear Fig. 8 • Remains loyal to Lear and forgives him; is forgiving toward her sisters as well • Deep, quiet, reserved Goneril • Lear’s ruthless oldest daughter, wife of Duke of Albany. She is aggressive and treacherous. Fig. 9 Regan • Lear’s middle daughter; wife of Duke of Cornwall. She is another archetypal villian; competes with Goneril for Edmund. Kent • Earl of Kent is Lear’s outspoken, loyal, and selfless companion (though he spends much of the play disguised as a peasant in order to be near Lear). • Samuel Taylor Coleridge wrote, "Kent is, perhaps, the nearest to perfect goodness in all Shakespeare's characters, and yet the most individualized." Gloucester (Glah-ster) • The Earl of Gloucester is loyal to Lear and his story Fig. 10 parallels Lear’s in many ways. • Misjudges his children • Capable of great bravery Edgar • Older, legitimate son of Gloucester. Banished by his father, half-brother to Edmund • Dutiful, much like Cordelia • His propensity for disguises makes him a complex character Edmund • An outright villain, the illegitimate son of Gloucester • Bitter, bold, and wreaker of destruction Sources: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/king-lear/background-on-king-lear/background-on-king-lear/486/ http://nfs.sparknotes.com/lear/characters.html Fig.1 http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-wcUtbm5tqns/T2HyAbNOb3I/AAAAAAAACAc/2eQhmoa5IwM/s1600/Chronicles+1577.jpeg Fig. 2 http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/kinglear/kingleirfrontpage.jpg Fig. 3 http://mouveuno.cila.unior.it/file.php/13/Lez5/media/Slide4a_1197675953.jpg Fig. 4 http://www-tc.pbs.org/shakespeare/images/players/king-james1.jpg Fig. 5 http://izquotes.com/images/george-iii.jpg Fig. 6 http://alexatkinsdesign.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/king-lear-aad-poster.png Fig. 7 http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/files/2014/07/KING-LEAR_Ian-McKellen-480x270.jpg Fig. 8 http://stephenwhitt.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/lear-and-cordelia.jpg Fig. 9 http://mmimageslarge.moviemail-online.co.uk/25267_king-lear-1.jpg Fig. 10 http://www.mckellen.com/images/3508.jpg.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JBC Book Clubs Discussion Guide Created in Partnership with Picador Jewishbookcouncil.Org
    JBC Book Clubs Discussion Guide Created in partnership with Picador Jewishbookcouncil.org Jewish Book Council Contents: 20th Century Russia: In Brief 3 A Glossary of Cultural References 7 JBC Book Clubs Discussion Questions 16 Recipes Inspired by The Yid 20 Articles of Interest and Related Media 25 Paul Goldberg’s JBC Visiting Scribe Blog Posts 26 20th Century Russia: In Brief After the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended the Czar- Stalin and the Jews ist autocracy, Russia’s future was uncertain, with At the start of the Russian Revolution, though reli- many political groups vying for power and ideolog- gion and religiosity was considered outdated and su- ical dominance. This led to the Russian Civil War perstitious, anti-Semitism was officially renounced (1917-1922), which was primarily a war between the by Lenin’s soviet (council) and the Bolsheviks. Bolsheviks (the Red Army) and those who opposed During this time, the State sanctioned institutions of them. The opposing White Army was a loose collec- Yiddish culture, like GOSET, as a way of connecting tion of Russian political groups and foreign nations. with the people and bringing them into the Commu- Lenin’s Bolsheviks eventually defeated the Whites nist ideology. and established Soviet rule through all of Russia un- der the Russian Communist Party. Following Lenin’s Though Stalin was personally an anti-Semite who death in 1924, Joseph Stalin, the Secretary General of hated “yids” and considered the enemy Menshevik the RCP, assumed leadership of the Soviet Union. Party an organization of Jews (as opposed to the Bolsheviks which he considered to be Russian), as Under Stalin, the country underwent a period of late as 1931, he continued to condemn anti-Semitism.
    [Show full text]
  • King Lear | H1 Notes
    King Lear | H1 Notes Edmund • Edmund, Gloucester’s illegitimate son, is undoubtedly one of the most Machiavellian and cunning characters in the play. • Bitter as a result of his lack of social status due to being born the “bastard” son. • Questions prejudice society has against children born out of wedlock, “Why brand they us/ With base?” • Feel sorry for him as it is clear that he has not received the same love from his father as his legitimate brother, “I have so often blushed to acknowledge him”. • Driven by ambition to improve his own social status and wealth, whatever the cost. • Clearly an immoral character who has no regard for his family. He hatches a plan to have his brother written out of his father’s will, a shocking act which makes his lack of care for Edgar evident, “Edmund the base/ Shall top the legitimate”. • His malicious nature is evident from the beginning of the play in Act I Scene II, where he tricks his father into believing that his legitimate son, Edgar, is plotting to kill him, “The contents, as in/ part I understand them, are to blame”. • Although Edmund’s cruelty is striking, I feel compelled to admire his creativeness in coming up with a plan to so effectively fool his father. • Edmund is also seen as cunning and two-faced as he ‘advises’ Edgar to go into hiding as Gloucester is looking to kill him, “Brother, I advise you to the best; go armed”. • Although incredibly immoral, it is quite admirable that Edmund so successfully turns his brother and father against each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordelia''s Portrait in the Context of King Lear''s
    Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez Cordelias Portrait in the Context of King Lears... 181 CORDELIAS PORTRAIT IN THE CONTEXT OF KING LEARS INDIVIDUATION* Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez** Abstract: This analysis attempts to show the relations between the individual psyche and the contents of the collective unconscious. Following Von Franzs analytical technique, the tragic action in King Lear will be read as an individuation process that will rescue archetypal contents and solve existential paradoxes that cause an imbalance between the ego and the self, leading to self-destruction. Once communication is eased and balance is restored, the transformation-seeking process that engaged the design of the play itself becomes resolved, and events can be led to a conventional tragic resolution. Jungian analysis will therefore provide a critical framework to unveil the subconscious contents that tear the character of the king between annihilation and survival, the anima complex that affects the king, responding thus for the action of the play and its centuries-old success. Keywords: collective unconscious, myth, individuation, archetype, tragedy, anima. Resumen: Este análisis pretende sacar a la luz las relaciones entre la psyche individual y los contenidos del inconsciente colectivo. Siguiendo la técnica analítica de Von Franz, la acción trágica de King Lear será entendida a través del proceso de individuación que revierte sobre los contenidos arquetípicos y resuelve las paradojas existenciales que cau- san el desequilibrio entre ego y self. Una vez que la comunicación es facilitada y el equilibrio psíquico recuperado, el proceso transformativo que afecta la génesis de la trama se resuelve y el argumento alcanza una resolución convencional.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Peters Prologue Shakespeare by Matthew Arnold Read by Eleanor
    Welcome Ruth Peters Prologue Shakespeare by Matthew Arnold read by Eleanor Zuercher Paul Hayter Introduction (and historical links in the programme) Thomas Morley (1557/8-1602) ‘My bonnie lass she smileth’ (madrigal) BCMC Singers with Chris Britton (flute), Rey Lear (flute), Christine Griggs (oboe), Robert Wells (oboe), Sarah Turnock (viol) and tambour John Dowland (1563-1626) Can she excuse my wrongs? (madrigal) Reading William Shakespeare (1564-1616) Description of Cleopatra - Anthony and Cleopatra, Act 2 Scene 2 William Byrd (1543 – 1623) Wolsey’s Wilde Giles Farnaby (1563 – 1640) Loth to Depart Thomas Morley La Volta John Bull (1562 – 1628) The King’s Hunt Chris Britton (recorder), Rey Lear (recorder and guitar), Karen Lesniak (recorder), Chris Seddon (recorder) John Farmer (fl.1591-1601) ‘Fair Phyllis I saw sitting all alone’ (madrigal) Orlando Gibbons (1583-1625) The Silver Swan (madrigal) Sonnet 130 William Shakespeare Michael Arne (1741-1786) ‘Pastorale’ Christine Griggs (oboe), Auriel Warwick (piano) Sonnet 129 William Shakespeare Henry Purcell (1659-95) Golden Sonata Christine Griggs (oboe), Robert Wells (oboe), Auriel Warwick (piano) Henry Purcell (1659-95) ‘ If Music be the Food of Love’ (arr.Chris Seddon) Cathy Bowker (piano), Sarah Turnock (viol) Thomas Arne (1710-1778) When Daisies Pied (madrigal) INTERVAL William Sterndale Bennet (1816-1875) words by Christopher Marlowe ‘ Come live with me’ (unaccompanied) Charles Wood (1866-1926) ‘Full Fathoms Five’ (unaccompanied) Carl Sandburg (1878-1967) ’They all want to play Hamlet’ Johannes Brahms (1833-1897) ‘Ophelia Lieder’ from Hamlet Helen Swift (soprano), accompanied by Cathy Bowker William Shakespeare The Death of Ophelia from Hamlet Sarah Quartel (b. 1982) ‘I know a bank where the wild thyme blows’ Alan Bullard (b.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth. In the twentieth century, the meddling continued with works like King Lear’s Wife (1913) by Gordon Bottomley and Dead Letters (1910) by Maurice Baring.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 12-10:30 Pm the Following Volunteers Are Largely Responsible for the Successful Operation of the Festival
    Michi an Festival Schoolcraft College July 20, 2003 12-10:30 pm The following volunteers are largely responsible for the successful operation of the festival. They are wearing navy blue T-shirts and will assist you in finding your way to your favorite performances, dining, the Jazz Walk and Steinway Jazz Cafe. Just ask! Enjoy! Richard Aja Jim Gumley Shroyer Family Rose Apple Carol & Fritz Patti Smith Molly Berkau Hansen Betty Smolinski Phyllis Berryman Jeanette Harris Dave, Carol & John Brady Pat Hill Travis Sneary Robin Bringard Kristin Hoy Lynne Standley- Ryan Mary Beth Busto Paul Hunt Ray & Shirley Jack Campau Karen Kendall Steinke Judi Cartright Barbara Lawlor Sam & Bonnie Ted & Liz Janie Clark Stock Linderman Jim & Sharon Mary Ann Edward Methot Cooper Sutherland Ken Murray Mary Ann Cripps Barbara Taylor Jim Newman Deborah Dani Jean & Karen Peter Davis Marcel Niemiec Tomalis Brenda & Fred Cindy Pierson Tom Tomczak Durling Kristin & Pat Linda & Steve Van Michele Elias Prouty Haverbeke M.J. Falls Arnie Robinson Fred Welsh Joyce Galindo Catherine Sailus Marlene Werts Anne Gallagher Joan Schott Marnee Westberg Chris Geinzer Dianne See Patricia Wheatley Nancy Gillis Mary Sen Bob, Betty & Ann Zimmerman Charles & Louise David Sharpe Greenwald Salute to Jack Pierson The Pied Piper of Jazz Just mention Jack Pierson's name to a group of jazz fans and someone will always tell you they were in one of his bands at Fordson High School, Henry Ford Community College or Schoolcraft College. These students follow him around as though he was the Pied Piper. They love playing for him, admire him and say they never fail to learn something .1_ new each time.
    [Show full text]
  • Directed by David Schwingle
    THE UNIVERSITY CLASSIC PLAYERS in William Shakespeare’s Directed by David Schwingle Set and Costume Design by Jeffrey Stegall Lighting design by Richard Streeter Music by Kenon Renfrow CAST OF CHARACTERS DIRECTOR’S NOTES Lear, King of Britain ......................................................................... Ron Pyle It is a fearful thing to write about Shakespeare (brief let me be!). The fear increases when one approaches the Goneril, Lear’s eldest daughter ............................................................... Erin Naler towering achievement that is King Lear. The wheel turns a bit more toward a paralyzed state if one considers Duke of Albany, Goneril’s husband ................................................... Harrison Miller the laden, ceremonial barge of relevant scholarship on the subjects. (Imagine entering a room and seeing Oswald, Goneril’s steward ............................................................. Nathan Pittack the eminent Shakespeare scholar, Emma Smith, or our local Spenser and Shakespeare scholar, Ron Horton, Regan, Lear’s second daughter ............................................................ Emily Arcuri comfortably seated, smiling at you!) And yet, though surrounded by giants on every side, some of Lear’s own Duke of Cornwall, Regan’s husband ..................................................... Alex Viscioni making, King Lear pushes on, so I’ll push on and pen a few words about Lear, language, and love. Cordelia, Lear’s youngest daughter ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund in King Lear the Role of Edmund in Shakespeare's King Lear Is Simultaneously Minor Yet Pivotal I
    Rachel Horton ENG 4336 Evil or Misunderstood: Edmund in King Lear The role of Edmund in Shakespeare’s King Lear is simultaneously minor yet pivotal in the play as a whole. The main plot discusses Lear and his struggle to maintain both his kingdom and his family. In this respect, Edmund means very little in the grand scheme of things and serves primarily as a sub-plot character who mirrors the main plot. Yet Shakespeare moves him fairly quickly into a person of influence in the play and in the conclusion, Edmund’s actions directly impact the final tragic ending. As a bastard child, Edmund has little to look forward to from family or society. Edmund, therefore, has an unequivocal desire to “get ahead in the world, and, since he has little charity, his quickest and most direct method is to supplant his brother” (Ellis 277). This desire leads to a “swift deception” (Ellis 275) of both Gloucester and Edgar and results in an “inversion of order” (Ellis 289). As a bastard son in a restrictive and hyper-ordered society, Edmund is determined to “strike off all shackles that might inhibit the free play of his energies. He therefore denies the inherited medieval standards of Elizabethan society” (Delany 431) and attempts to push himself forward in a manner that is indicative of a “political ruthlessness” which espouses a “strict and often brutal functionalism in social life” (Delany 433) He flippantly brushes aside the individual's obligations to society as no more than "the plague of custom" (I.ii.3) and calls upon Nature to “stand up for bastards” (I.ii.10).
    [Show full text]
  • Akira Kurosawa's Lear: Ran and the Failure of the Samurai Ethic
    1 Akira Kurosawa’s Lear: Ran and the Failure of the Samurai Ethic “Cineaste: You mentioned in an interview in a Japanese magazine that in Ran you wanted to depict a man’s karma from a “heavenly” viewpoint. Will you elaborate? Akira Kurosawa: I did not exactly say that. Japanese reporters always misunderstand or conveniently summarize what I really say. What I meant was that some of the essential scenes of this film are based on my wondering how God and Buddha, if they actually exist, perceive this human life, this mankind stuck in the same absurd behavior patterns. Kagemusha is made from the viewpoint of one of Kagemusha [shadow warrior—ed.] who sees the specific battles which he is involved in, and moreover the civil war period in general, from a very circumscribed point of view. This time, in Ran, I wanted to suggest a larger viewpoint . more objectively. I did not mean that I wanted to see through the eyes of a heavenly being. I believe that the world would not change even if I made a direct statement: do this and do that. Moreover, the world will not change unless we steadily change human nature itself and our very way of thinking. We have to exorcise the essential evil in human nature, rather than presenting concrete solutions to problems or directly depicting social problems. Therefore, my films might have become more philosophical.” + + + Just as Kurosawa reworked Shakespeare’s Macbeth in his Throne of Blood and reworked the main themes and characters of Hamlet in The Bad Sleep Well, Kurosawa in the last phase of his career chose to rework King Lear in his film Ran (or “Chaos”).
    [Show full text]
  • “Revenge in Shakespeare's Plays”
    “REVENGE IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS” “OTHELLO” – LECTURE/CLASS WRITTEN: 1603-1604…. although some critics place the date somewhat earlier in 1601- 1602 mainly on the basis of some “echoes” of the play in the 1603 “bad” quarto of “Hamlet”. AGE: 39-40 Years Old (B.1564-D.1616) CHRONO: Four years after “Hamlet”; first in the consecutive series of tragedies followed by “King Lear”, “Macbeth” then “Antony and Cleopatra”. GENRE: “The Great Tragedies” SOURCES: An Italian tale in the collection “Gli Hecatommithi” (1565) of Giovanni Battista Giraldi (writing under the name Cinthio) from which Shakespeare also drew for the plot of “Measure for Measure”. John Pory’s 1600 translation of John Leo’s “A Geographical History of Africa”; Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s “History of the World”; and Lewis Lewkenor’s 1599 “The Commonwealth and Government of Venice” mainly translated from a Latin text by Cardinal Contarini. STRUCTURE: “More a domestic tragedy than ‘Hamlet’, ‘Lear’ or ‘Macbeth’ concentrating on the destruction of Othello’s marriage and his murder of his wife rather than on affairs of state and the deaths of kings”. SUCCESS: The tragedy met with high success both at its initial Globe staging and well beyond mainly because of its exotic setting (Venice then Cypress), the “foregrounding of issues of race, gender and sexuality”, and the powerhouse performance of Richard Burbage, the most famous actor in Shakespeare’s company. HIGHLIGHT: Performed at the Banqueting House at Whitehall before King James I on 1 November 1604. AFTER: The play has been performed steadily since 1604; for a production in 1660 the actress Margaret Hughes as Desdemona “could have been the first professional actress on the English stage”.
    [Show full text]
  • Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-Going Adaptation of King Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ISBN: 978-0-494-52942-3 ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Original Cymbeline Companion Piece Lady Tongue for Professional Submission: Increasing Opportunity for Women in the Classical Theatre Sphere
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 12-2018 The Creation of Original Cymbeline Companion Piece Lady Tongue for Professional Submission: Increasing Opportunity for Women in the Classical Theatre Sphere Sarah Marksteiner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Playwriting Commons Recommended Citation Marksteiner, Sarah, "The Creation of Original Cymbeline Companion Piece Lady Tongue for Professional Submission: Increasing Opportunity for Women in the Classical Theatre Sphere" (2018). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1264. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1264 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Creation of Original Cymbeline Companion Piece Lady Tongue for Professional Submission: Increasing Opportunity for Women in the Classical Theatre Sphere A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Theatre from The College of William and Mary by Sarah A. Marksteiner Williamsburg, VA December 7, 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER I: THE GENESIS ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]