Descendants of Llyr King Lear

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Descendants of Llyr King Lear Descendants of Llyr King Lear Generation 1 1. LLYR KING1 LEAR was born in 10 AD in Abt,,British Columbia,Canada. He died in 10 AD in AD,,,. He married PENARDIM CELTIC. She was born in Judea, , British Columbia, Canada. Llyr King Lear and Penardim Celtic had the following child: 2. i. BRAN THE2 BLESSED (son of Llyr King Lear and Penardim Celtic) was born in 21 AD in Monmothshire, , , England. He died in 1936 in Monmothshire, , , England. He married ENYGEUS BEN JOSEPH. She was born in Ad, Maluku, Indonesia. She died in Ely, Cambridgeshire, , England. Generation 2 2. BRAN THE2 BLESSED (Llyr King1 Lear) was born in 21 AD in Monmothshire, , , England. He died in 1936 in Monmothshire, , , England. He married ENYGEUS BEN JOSEPH. She was born in Ad, Maluku, Indonesia. She died in Ely, Cambridgeshire, , England. Bran The Blessed and Enygeus Ben Joseph had the following children: 3. i. CARADOC THE3 SILURES (son of Bran The Blessed and Enygeus Ben Joseph) was born in Trevan, Llanilid, Glamorganshire, England. He died in Avalon, Cape May, New Jersey, United States. He married LIVING VENISSA. ii. CARADOC CARACTACUS OF SILURIA (son of Bran The Blessed and Enygeus Ben Joseph) was born in 1980 in Siluria, , , England. He died in 1954 in Rome, Roma, Lazio, Italy. iii. KING OF THE SILURES CARADOC (son of Bran The Blessed and Enygeus Ben Joseph) was born in 65 AD in Trevan,Llanilid,Glamorganshire,. He died in Rome,,,. Generation 3 3. CARADOC THE3 SILURES (Bran The2 Blessed, Llyr King1 Lear) was born in Trevan, Llanilid, Glamorganshire, England. He died in Avalon, Cape May, New Jersey, United States. He married LIVING VENISSA. Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA had the following children: 4. i. CYLLIN4 BRITAIN (son of Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA) was born in AD, , Welsh, England. He died in Brittian, , , England. He married (1) PENARDUN in , , , England. She was born in Empire, Dodge, Georgia, United States. She died in Empire, Dodge, Georgia, United States. He married JULIA ICENI. She was born in 1960 in Britannia, Savanne, Mauritius. She died in Icenia, Briania. ii. CYNON WELSH SILURES (son of Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA). iii. LINUS (son of Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA) was born in AD, , Welsh, England. iv. EURGAIN (daughter of Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA) was born in AD, , Welsh, England. v. CLAUDIA BRITANNICA WELSH SILURES (daughter of Caradoc the Silures and Living VENISSA) was born in 1936 in Welsh, , , England. She died in 1997 in Empire. Generation 4 4. CYLLIN4 BRITAIN (Caradoc the3 Silures, Bran The2 Blessed, Llyr King1 Lear) was born in AD, , Welsh, England. He died in Brittian, , , England. He married (1) PENARDUN in , , , England. She was born in Empire, Dodge, Georgia, United States. She died in Empire, Dodge, Georgia, was born in Empire, Dodge, Georgia,Generation United States.4 (con't) She died in Empire, Dodge, Georgia, United States. He married JULIA ICENI. She was born in 1960 in Britannia, Savanne, Mauritius. She died in Icenia, Briania. Cyllin Britain and Penardun had the following children: 5. i. COEL OLD5 BRITIAN (son of Cyllin Britain and Penardun) was born in , , , England. He died in 4 AD in Colchester, Essex, , England. He married (1) STRADA THE FAIR in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in 225 AD in , , Cumbria, England. She died in 300 AD in Siluria. He married DAUGHTER FETCH CYLLIN. She was born in Kings Queens, , , England. She died in Britânia, Goias, Brazil. He married (3) FIACHA SRABHTEINE BRITON in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in Britânia, Goias, Brazil. She died in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. He married (4) COEL BRITAIN in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in Great Britian, , , England. She died in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. He married (5) YSTRADWEL VERCH GADEON in Ad, Maluku, Indonesia. She was born in North, , , England. She died in Colchester, Essex, , England. ii. MERIC PENARDUN (daughter of Cyllin Britain and Penardun) was born in , Cornwall, , England. She died in Britânia, Goias, Brazil. iii. COILUS OF BRITANNIA (son of Cyllin Britain and Penardun) was born in Britannia, Savanne, Mauritius. He died in Colchester, Essex, , England. Generation 5 5. COEL OLD5 BRITIAN (Cyllin4 Britain, Caradoc the3 Silures, Bran The2 Blessed, Llyr King1 Lear) was born in , , , England. He died in 4 AD in Colchester, Essex, , England. He married (1) STRADA THE FAIR in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in 225 AD in , , Cumbria, England. She died in 300 AD in Siluria. He married DAUGHTER FETCH CYLLIN. She was born in Kings Queens, , , England. She died in Britânia, Goias, Brazil. He married (3) FIACHA SRABHTEINE BRITON in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in Britânia, Goias, Brazil. She died in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. He married (4) COEL BRITAIN in Great Britian, , , England. She was born in Great Britian, , , England. She died in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. He married (5) YSTRADWEL VERCH GADEON in Ad, Maluku, Indonesia. She was born in North, , , England. She died in Colchester, Essex, , England. Coel Old Britian and Strada The Fair had the following children: 6. i. LLEIFFER6 MAWR (son of Coel Old Britian and Strada The Fair) was born in Trevan, Llanilid, Glamorganshire, Wales. He died in St Mary Le Lode, Gloucestershire, , England. He married GLADYS SILURIA. She was born in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. She died in , , , England. ii. STHELENA (daughter of Coel Old Britian and Strada The Fair) was born in Minor, Yakutia, Russia. She died in Constantinople, Byzantium Empire, Turkey. iii. LLEWFER DESILURIA (son of Coel Old Britian and Strada The Fair). He died in , , , England. iv. ATHELDIS DEBRITAIN (daughter of Coel Old Britian and Strada The Fair) was born in , , , England. She died in , , , Germany. Coel Old Britian and Fiacha Srabhteine Briton had the following children: v. STHELENA (daughter of Coel Old Britian and Fiacha Srabhteine Briton) was born in Minor, Yakutia, Russia. She died in Constantinople, Byzantium Empire, Turkey. vi. LUCIUS MAWR (son of Coel Old Britian and Fiacha Srabhteine Briton) was born in Gave, , , Germany. He died in St Mary Le Lode, Gloucestershire, , England. Generation 5 (con't) vii. LLEWFER DESILURIA (son of Coel Old Britian and Fiacha Srabhteine Briton). He died in , , , England. viii. LLEIFFER MAWR LUCIUS BRITONS (son of Coel Old Britian and Fiacha Srabhteine Briton) was born in Gave, , , Germany. He died in St Mary Le Lode, Gloucestershire, , England. Coel Old Britian and Coel Britain had the following children: ix. STHELENA (daughter of Coel Old Britian and Coel Britain) was born in Minor, Yakutia, Russia. She died in Constantinople, Byzantium Empire, Turkey. x. LLEWFER DESILURIA (son of Coel Old Britian and Coel Britain). He died in , , , England. Coel Old Britian and Ystradwel Verch Gadeon had the following child: xi. ATHELDIS DEBRITAIN (daughter of Coel Old Britian and Ystradwel Verch Gadeon) was born in , , , England. She died in , , , Germany. Generation 6 6. LLEIFFER6 MAWR (Coel Old5 Britian, Cyllin4 Britain, Caradoc the3 Silures, Bran The2 Blessed, Llyr King1 Lear) was born in Trevan, Llanilid, Glamorganshire, Wales. He died in St Mary Le Lode, Gloucestershire, , England. He married GLADYS SILURIA. She was born in Siluria, Shelby, Alabama, United States. She died in , , , England. Lleiffer Mawr and Gladys Siluria had the following children: 7. i. CADWALLER CADVAN7 BRITAIN (son of Lleiffer Mawr and Gladys Siluria) was born in 193 AD in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. He died in Y, Somme, Picardie, France. He married Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr (daughter of Lucius Britain * and Gladys Britain *) in , , , England. She was born in 145 AD in Dedham, Essex, , England. She died in Rome, Roma, Lazio, Italy. ii. GLADYS VERCH MAWR (daughter of Lleiffer Mawr and Gladys Siluria) was born in , , Bretagne, France. She died in , , , England. Generation 7 7. CADWALLER CADVAN7 BRITAIN (Lleiffer6 Mawr, Coel Old5 Britian, Cyllin4, Caradoc the3 Silures, Bran The2 Blessed, Llyr King1 Lear) was born in 193 AD in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. He died in Y, Somme, Picardie, France. He married Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr (daughter of Lucius Britain * and Gladys Britain *) in , , , England. She was born in 145 AD in Dedham, Essex, , England. She died in Rome, Roma, Lazio, Italy. Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr had the following children: 8. i. FRIGG8 FREA (daughter of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in 219 AD in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. She died in Hleithra, Nordjylland, Jutland, Denmark. She married WODEN ODIN. He was born in 215 AD in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. He died in Lake, Uppsala, Sweden. ii. FRIGG VERCH CADWALDR (daughter of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in 173 AD in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. She died in Loggrin, Siptuna, Sweden. iii. FRIEGE BRITAIN FREA (daughter of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in Europe, Fayette, Georgia, United States. She died in Hleithra, Zeeland, Denmark. Generation 7 (con't) iv. FRIEGE FIRGG DESILURIA (daughter of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan. She died in Åsgard, More og Romsdal, Norway. v. COEL II DE CAMULOD (son of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in , , Bretagne, France. He died in Rome, Roma, Lazio, Italy. vi. COEL BRITAIN (son of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in Camulod, , , England. He died in Indiana, United States. vii. FREA FRIEGE OF BRETAGNE (daughter of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in Europe, Fayette, Georgia, United States. She died in Hleithra, Nordjylland, Jutland, Denmark. viii. COEL II DE CAMULOD (son of Cadwaller Cadvan Britain and Gwladys Ferch Lleiffer Mawr) was born in , , Bretagne, France.
Recommended publications
  • JBC Book Clubs Discussion Guide Created in Partnership with Picador Jewishbookcouncil.Org
    JBC Book Clubs Discussion Guide Created in partnership with Picador Jewishbookcouncil.org Jewish Book Council Contents: 20th Century Russia: In Brief 3 A Glossary of Cultural References 7 JBC Book Clubs Discussion Questions 16 Recipes Inspired by The Yid 20 Articles of Interest and Related Media 25 Paul Goldberg’s JBC Visiting Scribe Blog Posts 26 20th Century Russia: In Brief After the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended the Czar- Stalin and the Jews ist autocracy, Russia’s future was uncertain, with At the start of the Russian Revolution, though reli- many political groups vying for power and ideolog- gion and religiosity was considered outdated and su- ical dominance. This led to the Russian Civil War perstitious, anti-Semitism was officially renounced (1917-1922), which was primarily a war between the by Lenin’s soviet (council) and the Bolsheviks. Bolsheviks (the Red Army) and those who opposed During this time, the State sanctioned institutions of them. The opposing White Army was a loose collec- Yiddish culture, like GOSET, as a way of connecting tion of Russian political groups and foreign nations. with the people and bringing them into the Commu- Lenin’s Bolsheviks eventually defeated the Whites nist ideology. and established Soviet rule through all of Russia un- der the Russian Communist Party. Following Lenin’s Though Stalin was personally an anti-Semite who death in 1924, Joseph Stalin, the Secretary General of hated “yids” and considered the enemy Menshevik the RCP, assumed leadership of the Soviet Union. Party an organization of Jews (as opposed to the Bolsheviks which he considered to be Russian), as Under Stalin, the country underwent a period of late as 1931, he continued to condemn anti-Semitism.
    [Show full text]
  • King Lear | H1 Notes
    King Lear | H1 Notes Edmund • Edmund, Gloucester’s illegitimate son, is undoubtedly one of the most Machiavellian and cunning characters in the play. • Bitter as a result of his lack of social status due to being born the “bastard” son. • Questions prejudice society has against children born out of wedlock, “Why brand they us/ With base?” • Feel sorry for him as it is clear that he has not received the same love from his father as his legitimate brother, “I have so often blushed to acknowledge him”. • Driven by ambition to improve his own social status and wealth, whatever the cost. • Clearly an immoral character who has no regard for his family. He hatches a plan to have his brother written out of his father’s will, a shocking act which makes his lack of care for Edgar evident, “Edmund the base/ Shall top the legitimate”. • His malicious nature is evident from the beginning of the play in Act I Scene II, where he tricks his father into believing that his legitimate son, Edgar, is plotting to kill him, “The contents, as in/ part I understand them, are to blame”. • Although Edmund’s cruelty is striking, I feel compelled to admire his creativeness in coming up with a plan to so effectively fool his father. • Edmund is also seen as cunning and two-faced as he ‘advises’ Edgar to go into hiding as Gloucester is looking to kill him, “Brother, I advise you to the best; go armed”. • Although incredibly immoral, it is quite admirable that Edmund so successfully turns his brother and father against each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordelia''s Portrait in the Context of King Lear''s
    Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez Cordelias Portrait in the Context of King Lears... 181 CORDELIAS PORTRAIT IN THE CONTEXT OF KING LEARS INDIVIDUATION* Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez** Abstract: This analysis attempts to show the relations between the individual psyche and the contents of the collective unconscious. Following Von Franzs analytical technique, the tragic action in King Lear will be read as an individuation process that will rescue archetypal contents and solve existential paradoxes that cause an imbalance between the ego and the self, leading to self-destruction. Once communication is eased and balance is restored, the transformation-seeking process that engaged the design of the play itself becomes resolved, and events can be led to a conventional tragic resolution. Jungian analysis will therefore provide a critical framework to unveil the subconscious contents that tear the character of the king between annihilation and survival, the anima complex that affects the king, responding thus for the action of the play and its centuries-old success. Keywords: collective unconscious, myth, individuation, archetype, tragedy, anima. Resumen: Este análisis pretende sacar a la luz las relaciones entre la psyche individual y los contenidos del inconsciente colectivo. Siguiendo la técnica analítica de Von Franz, la acción trágica de King Lear será entendida a través del proceso de individuación que revierte sobre los contenidos arquetípicos y resuelve las paradojas existenciales que cau- san el desequilibrio entre ego y self. Una vez que la comunicación es facilitada y el equilibrio psíquico recuperado, el proceso transformativo que afecta la génesis de la trama se resuelve y el argumento alcanza una resolución convencional.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Peters Prologue Shakespeare by Matthew Arnold Read by Eleanor
    Welcome Ruth Peters Prologue Shakespeare by Matthew Arnold read by Eleanor Zuercher Paul Hayter Introduction (and historical links in the programme) Thomas Morley (1557/8-1602) ‘My bonnie lass she smileth’ (madrigal) BCMC Singers with Chris Britton (flute), Rey Lear (flute), Christine Griggs (oboe), Robert Wells (oboe), Sarah Turnock (viol) and tambour John Dowland (1563-1626) Can she excuse my wrongs? (madrigal) Reading William Shakespeare (1564-1616) Description of Cleopatra - Anthony and Cleopatra, Act 2 Scene 2 William Byrd (1543 – 1623) Wolsey’s Wilde Giles Farnaby (1563 – 1640) Loth to Depart Thomas Morley La Volta John Bull (1562 – 1628) The King’s Hunt Chris Britton (recorder), Rey Lear (recorder and guitar), Karen Lesniak (recorder), Chris Seddon (recorder) John Farmer (fl.1591-1601) ‘Fair Phyllis I saw sitting all alone’ (madrigal) Orlando Gibbons (1583-1625) The Silver Swan (madrigal) Sonnet 130 William Shakespeare Michael Arne (1741-1786) ‘Pastorale’ Christine Griggs (oboe), Auriel Warwick (piano) Sonnet 129 William Shakespeare Henry Purcell (1659-95) Golden Sonata Christine Griggs (oboe), Robert Wells (oboe), Auriel Warwick (piano) Henry Purcell (1659-95) ‘ If Music be the Food of Love’ (arr.Chris Seddon) Cathy Bowker (piano), Sarah Turnock (viol) Thomas Arne (1710-1778) When Daisies Pied (madrigal) INTERVAL William Sterndale Bennet (1816-1875) words by Christopher Marlowe ‘ Come live with me’ (unaccompanied) Charles Wood (1866-1926) ‘Full Fathoms Five’ (unaccompanied) Carl Sandburg (1878-1967) ’They all want to play Hamlet’ Johannes Brahms (1833-1897) ‘Ophelia Lieder’ from Hamlet Helen Swift (soprano), accompanied by Cathy Bowker William Shakespeare The Death of Ophelia from Hamlet Sarah Quartel (b. 1982) ‘I know a bank where the wild thyme blows’ Alan Bullard (b.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth. In the twentieth century, the meddling continued with works like King Lear’s Wife (1913) by Gordon Bottomley and Dead Letters (1910) by Maurice Baring.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 12-10:30 Pm the Following Volunteers Are Largely Responsible for the Successful Operation of the Festival
    Michi an Festival Schoolcraft College July 20, 2003 12-10:30 pm The following volunteers are largely responsible for the successful operation of the festival. They are wearing navy blue T-shirts and will assist you in finding your way to your favorite performances, dining, the Jazz Walk and Steinway Jazz Cafe. Just ask! Enjoy! Richard Aja Jim Gumley Shroyer Family Rose Apple Carol & Fritz Patti Smith Molly Berkau Hansen Betty Smolinski Phyllis Berryman Jeanette Harris Dave, Carol & John Brady Pat Hill Travis Sneary Robin Bringard Kristin Hoy Lynne Standley- Ryan Mary Beth Busto Paul Hunt Ray & Shirley Jack Campau Karen Kendall Steinke Judi Cartright Barbara Lawlor Sam & Bonnie Ted & Liz Janie Clark Stock Linderman Jim & Sharon Mary Ann Edward Methot Cooper Sutherland Ken Murray Mary Ann Cripps Barbara Taylor Jim Newman Deborah Dani Jean & Karen Peter Davis Marcel Niemiec Tomalis Brenda & Fred Cindy Pierson Tom Tomczak Durling Kristin & Pat Linda & Steve Van Michele Elias Prouty Haverbeke M.J. Falls Arnie Robinson Fred Welsh Joyce Galindo Catherine Sailus Marlene Werts Anne Gallagher Joan Schott Marnee Westberg Chris Geinzer Dianne See Patricia Wheatley Nancy Gillis Mary Sen Bob, Betty & Ann Zimmerman Charles & Louise David Sharpe Greenwald Salute to Jack Pierson The Pied Piper of Jazz Just mention Jack Pierson's name to a group of jazz fans and someone will always tell you they were in one of his bands at Fordson High School, Henry Ford Community College or Schoolcraft College. These students follow him around as though he was the Pied Piper. They love playing for him, admire him and say they never fail to learn something .1_ new each time.
    [Show full text]
  • Directed by David Schwingle
    THE UNIVERSITY CLASSIC PLAYERS in William Shakespeare’s Directed by David Schwingle Set and Costume Design by Jeffrey Stegall Lighting design by Richard Streeter Music by Kenon Renfrow CAST OF CHARACTERS DIRECTOR’S NOTES Lear, King of Britain ......................................................................... Ron Pyle It is a fearful thing to write about Shakespeare (brief let me be!). The fear increases when one approaches the Goneril, Lear’s eldest daughter ............................................................... Erin Naler towering achievement that is King Lear. The wheel turns a bit more toward a paralyzed state if one considers Duke of Albany, Goneril’s husband ................................................... Harrison Miller the laden, ceremonial barge of relevant scholarship on the subjects. (Imagine entering a room and seeing Oswald, Goneril’s steward ............................................................. Nathan Pittack the eminent Shakespeare scholar, Emma Smith, or our local Spenser and Shakespeare scholar, Ron Horton, Regan, Lear’s second daughter ............................................................ Emily Arcuri comfortably seated, smiling at you!) And yet, though surrounded by giants on every side, some of Lear’s own Duke of Cornwall, Regan’s husband ..................................................... Alex Viscioni making, King Lear pushes on, so I’ll push on and pen a few words about Lear, language, and love. Cordelia, Lear’s youngest daughter ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund in King Lear the Role of Edmund in Shakespeare's King Lear Is Simultaneously Minor Yet Pivotal I
    Rachel Horton ENG 4336 Evil or Misunderstood: Edmund in King Lear The role of Edmund in Shakespeare’s King Lear is simultaneously minor yet pivotal in the play as a whole. The main plot discusses Lear and his struggle to maintain both his kingdom and his family. In this respect, Edmund means very little in the grand scheme of things and serves primarily as a sub-plot character who mirrors the main plot. Yet Shakespeare moves him fairly quickly into a person of influence in the play and in the conclusion, Edmund’s actions directly impact the final tragic ending. As a bastard child, Edmund has little to look forward to from family or society. Edmund, therefore, has an unequivocal desire to “get ahead in the world, and, since he has little charity, his quickest and most direct method is to supplant his brother” (Ellis 277). This desire leads to a “swift deception” (Ellis 275) of both Gloucester and Edgar and results in an “inversion of order” (Ellis 289). As a bastard son in a restrictive and hyper-ordered society, Edmund is determined to “strike off all shackles that might inhibit the free play of his energies. He therefore denies the inherited medieval standards of Elizabethan society” (Delany 431) and attempts to push himself forward in a manner that is indicative of a “political ruthlessness” which espouses a “strict and often brutal functionalism in social life” (Delany 433) He flippantly brushes aside the individual's obligations to society as no more than "the plague of custom" (I.ii.3) and calls upon Nature to “stand up for bastards” (I.ii.10).
    [Show full text]
  • Akira Kurosawa's Lear: Ran and the Failure of the Samurai Ethic
    1 Akira Kurosawa’s Lear: Ran and the Failure of the Samurai Ethic “Cineaste: You mentioned in an interview in a Japanese magazine that in Ran you wanted to depict a man’s karma from a “heavenly” viewpoint. Will you elaborate? Akira Kurosawa: I did not exactly say that. Japanese reporters always misunderstand or conveniently summarize what I really say. What I meant was that some of the essential scenes of this film are based on my wondering how God and Buddha, if they actually exist, perceive this human life, this mankind stuck in the same absurd behavior patterns. Kagemusha is made from the viewpoint of one of Kagemusha [shadow warrior—ed.] who sees the specific battles which he is involved in, and moreover the civil war period in general, from a very circumscribed point of view. This time, in Ran, I wanted to suggest a larger viewpoint . more objectively. I did not mean that I wanted to see through the eyes of a heavenly being. I believe that the world would not change even if I made a direct statement: do this and do that. Moreover, the world will not change unless we steadily change human nature itself and our very way of thinking. We have to exorcise the essential evil in human nature, rather than presenting concrete solutions to problems or directly depicting social problems. Therefore, my films might have become more philosophical.” + + + Just as Kurosawa reworked Shakespeare’s Macbeth in his Throne of Blood and reworked the main themes and characters of Hamlet in The Bad Sleep Well, Kurosawa in the last phase of his career chose to rework King Lear in his film Ran (or “Chaos”).
    [Show full text]
  • “Revenge in Shakespeare's Plays”
    “REVENGE IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS” “OTHELLO” – LECTURE/CLASS WRITTEN: 1603-1604…. although some critics place the date somewhat earlier in 1601- 1602 mainly on the basis of some “echoes” of the play in the 1603 “bad” quarto of “Hamlet”. AGE: 39-40 Years Old (B.1564-D.1616) CHRONO: Four years after “Hamlet”; first in the consecutive series of tragedies followed by “King Lear”, “Macbeth” then “Antony and Cleopatra”. GENRE: “The Great Tragedies” SOURCES: An Italian tale in the collection “Gli Hecatommithi” (1565) of Giovanni Battista Giraldi (writing under the name Cinthio) from which Shakespeare also drew for the plot of “Measure for Measure”. John Pory’s 1600 translation of John Leo’s “A Geographical History of Africa”; Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s “History of the World”; and Lewis Lewkenor’s 1599 “The Commonwealth and Government of Venice” mainly translated from a Latin text by Cardinal Contarini. STRUCTURE: “More a domestic tragedy than ‘Hamlet’, ‘Lear’ or ‘Macbeth’ concentrating on the destruction of Othello’s marriage and his murder of his wife rather than on affairs of state and the deaths of kings”. SUCCESS: The tragedy met with high success both at its initial Globe staging and well beyond mainly because of its exotic setting (Venice then Cypress), the “foregrounding of issues of race, gender and sexuality”, and the powerhouse performance of Richard Burbage, the most famous actor in Shakespeare’s company. HIGHLIGHT: Performed at the Banqueting House at Whitehall before King James I on 1 November 1604. AFTER: The play has been performed steadily since 1604; for a production in 1660 the actress Margaret Hughes as Desdemona “could have been the first professional actress on the English stage”.
    [Show full text]
  • Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-Going Adaptation of King Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ISBN: 978-0-494-52942-3 ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth.
    [Show full text]
  • Oboe Trios: an Annotated Bibliography
    Oboe Trios: An Annotated Bibliography by Melissa Sassaman A Research Paper Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Musical Arts Approved November 2014 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Martin Schuring, Chair Elizabeth Buck Amy Holbrook Gary Hill ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2014 ABSTRACT This project is a practical annotated bibliography of original works for oboe trio with the specific instrumentation of two oboes and English horn. Presenting descriptions of 116 readily available oboe trios, this project is intended to promote awareness, accessibility, and performance of compositions within this genre. The annotated bibliography focuses exclusively on original, published works for two oboes and English horn. Unpublished works, arrangements, works that are out of print and not available through interlibrary loan, or works that feature slightly altered instrumentation are not included. Entries in this annotated bibliography are listed alphabetically by the last name of the composer. Each entry includes the dates of the composer and a brief biography, followed by the title of the work, composition date, commission, and dedication of the piece. Also included are the names of publishers, the length of the entire piece in minutes and seconds, and an incipit of the first one to eight measures for each movement of the work. In addition to providing a comprehensive and detailed bibliography of oboe trios, this document traces the history of the oboe trio and includes biographical sketches of each composer cited, allowing readers to place the genre of oboe trios and each individual composition into its historical context. Four appendices at the end include a list of trios arranged alphabetically by composer’s last name, chronologically by the date of composition, and by country of origin and a list of publications of Ludwig van Beethoven's oboe trios from the 1940s and earlier.
    [Show full text]