THE PRINCETON JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN STUDIES
VOLUME VI
SPRING 2014
PRINCETON JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN STUDIES
EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Charlie Fortin ’15 Ryan T. Kang ’14
COPY EDITING TEAM LAYOUT TEAM FINANCE & OPERATIONS TEAM ASSOCIATE EDITOR LAYOUT MANAGER FINANCE MANAGER Jee Eun (Jean) Lee ’15 Jiweon Kim ’15 Sam Wu ’16
EDITORS EDITORS STAFF Isao Anzai ’17 Vivian Chen ’17 Vivian Chen ’17 Daway Chou-Ren ’16 Jenny Nan Jiang ’16 William Lee ’16 Mary Gilstad ’15 Brian Kim ’16 Kevin Liaw ’15 Hannah Hirsh ’16 Jessica McLemore ’15 Nancy Song ’17 Christopher Yu ’17 Sam Wu ’16 ! IT TEAM SOCIAL MEDIA TEAM IT MANAGER SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGER Pavel Shibayev ’15 Ben Chang ’14
STAFF STAFF Patrick Ding ’15 Samuel Chang ’16 Jenny Nan Jiang ’16 Greg Siano ’15
CHINA EDITORIAL TEAM JAPAN EDITORIAL TEAM KOREA EDITORIAL TEAM ASSOCIATE EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR Kevin Liaw ’15 Evan Kratzer ’16 Jee Eun (Jean) Lee ’15
GRADUATE EDITOR GRADUATE EDITOR EDITORS Elijah Greenstein ’G2 David Boyd ’G2 Jisoo Han ’14 Alan Hatfield ’15 EDITORS EDITORS Minji Kim ’16 Ben Chang ’14 Adrienne Fung ’14 Jess Lee ’16 Gavin Cook ’15 Morgan Jerkins ’14 Yoolim Lee ’17 Sharon Deng ’17 Chris Edwards van Mujien ’15 Nicholas Pang ’15 Alicia Li ’16 Arjun Naidu ’15 Jay Park ’16 Rebecca Haynes ’15 Buyan Pan ’15 Catherine Hochman ’16 ! Hunter Rex ’16 Emily Tu ’16 Cameron White ’14! FACULTY ADVISOR Professor Amy Borovoy
TABLE OF CONTENTS ! ! 1. WINNING THE SOUTH, LOSING THE PENINSULA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. COUNTERINSURGENCY EXPERIENCE IN SOUTHERN KOREA, 1945-1948 | DOORI SONG | COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 1
2. REGIME STABILITY OR MINERAL WEALTH? CHINA’S INTEREST IN TRADE WITH NORTH KOREA| ANNIE MEYJES | HARVARD UNIVERSITY 20
3. K-FILMS, K-DRAMAS, K-POP, NEXT UP... K-VARIETY? KOREAN VARIETY – THE NEW ADDITION TO THE HALLYU WAVE | HUI MIN LEE | NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 46
4. TWO KINGDOMS UNDER GOD: CAESAR AND CHRIST IN THE JERUSALEM OF THE EAST | BRIAN JIHYUK KIM | PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 59
5. POWER OF PLACE AND PLACE OF POWER: SEIGNIOR SHANG KEXI’S TEMPLE-BUILDING CAREER IN GUANGDONG IN THE EARLY QING | MENGXIAO WANG | YALE UNIVERSITY 78
6. EXPANDING POPULATIONS: THE AMERICAN MULTIPLICATION TABLE IN THE CHINESE CONTEXT| RYAN MIKKELSEN | WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS 96
7. BLESSED ARE THEY WHO ARE OPEN-MINDED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEATITUDES IN THE “UNION” EDITION OF THE CHINESE BIBLE| GINA ELIA | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 109
8. “KOREAN WAVE” IN TAIPEI: THE CONSTRUCTION OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN | XINYAN PENG | UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA 123
9. CHINA’S GLOBAL ANIMATION AMBITIONS: CULTURAL FLOWS AND SOFT POWER IN EAST ASIA | RICK MARSHALL | ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY 146
10. SPECIAL FEATURE: INTERVIEW WITH HARVARD SOCIOLOGIST EZRA VOGEL ON CONTEMPORARY ASIA | ALAN HATFIELD | PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 178
WINNING THE SOUTH, LOSING THE PENINSULA A Study of the US Counterinsurgency Experience in Southern Korea, 1945-1948 Doori Song Columbia University
ABSTRACT disbandment on August 15, 1948, the United States Army Military Government The US occupation of South Korea was in Korea (USAMGIK) was constantly not without difficulty. From the time of challenged. American authorities had not its establishment on September 8, 1945 to anticipated major resistance movements in the time of its disbandment on August 15, Korea because the peninsula was liberated 1948, the United States Army Military from Japanese colonial rule on August 15, Government in Korea (USAMGIK) was 1945. They had also not expected that the constantly challenged by an insurgency. majority of Koreans would sympathize Because they helped to liberate Koreans with the resistors, who called for the from Japanese colonial rule, Americans establishment of a left-leaning mode of did not anticipate major resistance state governance. It was indeed not movements in Korea. They also did not uncommon to see civilians condone or expect that the majority of Koreans would even participate in uprisings opposing sympathize with the resistors, who called USAMGIK policies. How, then, did US for a left- leaning mode of state authorities deal with these resistance governance. Because of America’s Cold movements?” Because of the United War agenda, the USAMGIK had little States’ Cold War agenda, which required choice but to subdue those opposing its occupation forces to contain the spread democratization in southern Korea. of communism, the USAMGIK had to By instituting various counterinsurgency subdue any opposition movement that mechanisms such as policing operations, sought to thwart the building of a education programs, and trust-building sustainable democracy and capitalist measures while enlisting the support of economy in southern Korea. By Korean elites, the US ensured that its instituting various counterinsurgency objectives in Korea were met. In the end, mechanisms such as policing operations, the USAMGIK suppressed the insurgents education programs, and trust-building and established the first nationally elected measures while enlisting the support of South Korean government on August 15, Korean elites, the USAMGIK devised a 1948. The success of the overall campaign to ensure that its objectives campaign, however, turned out to be only were met. In the end, the USAMGIK temporary— victory came at the expense managed to suppress the insurgents and of creating a more volatile and deep- help establish the first nationally-elected rooted conflict. South Korean government on August 15, 1948.
INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW AND THE COUNTERINSURGENCY From the time of its establishment on PERSPECTIVE September 8, 1945 to the time of its
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 1!
This paper aims to provide a critical immobile and homogenous.iv The works examination of the USAMGIK of Cumings and others reveal that the counterinsurgency experience in South motives of the Korean insurgents were Korea. Although many studies have been not entirely inspired by communist conducted on various cases of insurgency interests but by desires to purge all and counterinsurgency, there is a limited vestiges of the former Japanese colonial- amount of research for South Korean state.v The insurgents’ main concerns were cases. The number of existing works is to nationalize industries, reform land- low and several of them are partial to a holdings, reduce rice collection quotas, specific ideological orientation. The and exile colonial-state collaborators. nation-state histories of the US and They ultimately opposed the USAMGIK Republic of Korea (ROK), for example, because its policies intended to revive are noteworthy for their ideologically several institutions from a prior colonial aligned interpretations. According to these era. Allowing the USAMGIK to rule is views, the overall counterinsurgency ultimately regarded as a failure by experience is seen as nothing more than a insurgents, not because they were unable “victory” in one of their many allied fights to communize the Korean peninsula, but against communism. i The insurgents are because they failed to expel the colonial- invariably classified as communist state vestiges that they vehemently agitators and given little mention of their abhorred. vi Other revisionist accounts motives or interests. Although these views have also helped to expand existing views align with the capitalist interests of both by revealing how some of the insurgents the US and South Korea, these statist protested simply to protect their supplies interpretations risk misrecognizing aspects of rice or to conserve Korean traditions.vii of history.ii This is especially the case with This paper also approaches the the interpretations that deal with an USAMGIK experience from a revisionist ideologically antithetical “Other.” iii angle. It employs a mode of analysis that Notwithstanding slight modifications, the has recently risen in significance in the nation-state views of the US and ROK field of security studies: the have been resistant to change because counterinsurgency perspective. Although elements of the Cold War still exist in the there are revisionist accounts that address Korean peninsula. the subject of USAMGIK Revisionist accounts of the counterinsurgency, none of them USAMGIK experience began to appear systematically analyze the topic from along with the progressive social recent theoretical perspectives. The movements of the 1970s and 1980s. Bruce breakthroughs in this method of analysis Cumings’ two-volume book, The Origins of are largely the product of innovative new the Korean War, deserves special mention studies conducted in the post-Cold War for its exhaustive coverage of era. viii The cumulative contributions and developments in Korea before the Korean interplay of these works, predominantly War (1950-1953). In contrast to the by political scientists and military analysts, nation-state perspectives of the US and have led to a more systematic ROK governments, Cumings recounts the understanding of cases of insurgency and USAMGIK experience from a critical counterinsurgency. The aim of this paper point of view. He aims to produce a is to historicize the USAMGIK “counter-history,” in a Foucauldian sense, counterinsurgency experience through the by introducing dynamism and diversity framework of the counterinsurgency into what was previously considered perspective. Based on data collected from
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 2! declassified USAMGIK documents, and counterinsurgent forces. xi The Korean newspapers, and propaganda counterinsurgents possess much greater manuscripts, this paper argues that in the power from their control of law-enforcing context of the Korean peninsula, the US units, such as policemen and soldiers. occupation failed to eliminate the They also have the advantage of fundamental causes of insurgency and to controlling the main transportation and prevent those causes from returning. communications systems within their territorial borders. Meanwhile, the PRINCIPLES OF THE insurgents have limited access to funds, COUNTERINSURGENCY personnel, weapons and technology. They PERSPECTIVE are generally outnumbered by a ratio of ten to one against the state in terms of According to the counterinsurgency manpower.xii In Malaysia, for example, the perspective, there are no two identical insurgents consisted of about 5,500 units cases of insurgency, but fundamental in 1948 while the British Commonwealth commonalities do exist in most cases. possessed over 40,000 soldiers. The Front First, almost every case of insurgency and de Liberation in Algeria likewise had counterinsurgency reflects an about 29,000 fighters in 1956 compared to incompatible political objective between the 400,000 member army of France. the state and large group of civilians. Insurgent forces also rarely have a Although domestic political disputes can permanent base of operations because be resolved without violence, physical acts they are required to move frequently in of protest often erupt when diplomatic order to avoid capture. This requires efforts have been exhausted. History has much time and energy and makes shown that this often occurs when a coordination and organizational work dissident group, representing a communal slow and inefficient. or socioeconomic body, feels alienated or The decisive factor that ultimately is denied recognition by its political settles an insurrectionary conflict is the system. ix The Hukbalahap rebels in the support of the host nation’s neutral “third Philippines, for example, precipitated party”; that is, when a national consensus mass revolt against the state in 1946 among the civilian population is reached because the Philippine government in favor of one side. xiii The strategy of refused to seat them in legislature. Many winning the hearts and minds of the third other clashes of this type were common party, according to the counterinsurgency after World War II in postcolonial settings perspective, differs between the insurgent where social institutions and norms were and counterinsurgent forces. For the subject to new stresses and strains amid insurgents, since their relative strength is processes of modernization. x The clash much weaker, they have no choice but to between the French and Front de resort to unconventional battle tactics Libération in Algeria, the British such as terrorism, vigilantism, guerilla Commonwealth’s conflict with the warfare, or propaganda warfare to National Liberation Army in Malaya, and delegitimize and demoralize the state and the US Army’s battle with the Viet Cong to coerce or persuade the civilian in South Vietnam are three prominent population. A conventional attack against examples. the much stronger counterinsurgent force Another core aspect of insurgency is tantamount to self-destruction. xiv In and counterinsurgency is an asymmetrical addition, the insurgent group must take an balance of power between the insurgent offensive position against the
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 3! counterinsurgent group because the economic and ideological and only 10% former seeks to replace the current combative.” xx The results are more political structure that the latter aims to optimal when coercion, such as torture, perpetuate. The insurgents must make the intimidation, or blackmail, is not used to first move and be ready to assume the ensure the public’s cooperation. In the functions and characteristics of an Philippines, for example, the practice of alternative government.xv They may also ending police brutality while instituting a look to collect taxes and supplies from campaign based on attraction and supporters or organize the population into fellowship helped Governor Ramon local militia units that gradually develop Magsaysay subdue the Hukbalahap into a regular army. The Chinese rebellion.xxi Field Marshal Gerald Templar Communist Party during the early-to-mid likewise succeeded in suppressing the twentieth century, for example, proceeded insurgents in Malaya after convincing the along this course of action until they public to accept British Commonwealth assumed power of the Chinese mainland forces as guardians and friends.xxii Without in 1949. The insurgents also have the the support of the civilian population, advantage, especially against foreign-led according to Mao Zedong, both sides are counterinsurgent forces, of civilian like fish out of water—for the relationship populations that tend to be more between the combatants and the people is sympathetic towards their cause due to like that between fish and water.xxiii bonds of nationalism, race, history, or Overall, an effective campaign other commonalities.xvi requires an appealing and just political On the other hand, the cause for both the insurgent or counterinsurgents must be cautious not to counterinsurgent forces. The tactics for overexert their advantages. Conventional victory, however, are different between fighting tactics—such as the use of the two groups. The insurgents must be machine guns, land mines, or airstrikes— visible to the civilian population but should be avoided because they are invisible to the counterinsurgents. expensive and have the potential for According to Carl von Clausewitz, they collateral damage. They will kill some must employ offensive tactics that nibble insurgents but others will inevitably at but don’t bite the shell of their much emerge to replace them. xvii The stronger opponent. The insurgents must counterinsurgents must instead work to “mobilize like fog” around the persuade the general public to reject the counterinsurgents’ perimeter and “form a insurgents’ political cause. They do so by dark and menacing cloud out of which a demonstrating their legitimacy as bolt may strike.”xxiv In addition, a healthy government leaders. The populace should mix of terrorism to deter civilians from be provided with adequate security, access complying with the state and propaganda to state capital, education, and political to persuade neutrals to join their camp is participation. xviii Counterinsurgents must imperative for the insurgents. In be ready to serve the public as social opposition, the counterinsurgents must workers, teachers, physicians, and civil demonstrate good leadership and engineers. They should also collaborate composure. Their law enforcement units with supportive members of the host should be used moderately and carefully population to help rally support for their so as not to harm civilians or damage cause. xix According to General Rene civilian property. The welfare of the Emilio Ponce, counterinsurgency people must also be protected by ensuring campaigns are “90% political, social, their safety and well-being. Meanwhile,
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 4! the counterinsurgents must work to agriculturally rich south turned to legitimize the current government body by producing rice and grains to develop its fostering public trust in the existing economy.xxvi Postwar rice production was political system. also important globally because rice was the staple food for more than half of the THE US COUNTERINSURGENCY world’s population at the time. Since 90% EXPERIENCE IN SOUTHERN of rice was produced in East Asia, much KOREA, 1945-1948 of the Cold War competition in the region centered on a race to produce rice.xxvii In When US occupation forces arrived southern Korea, about 40% of the in southern Korea after the end of World cultivated land was devoted to rice War II, their top priorities were to revive production. The second and third most the economy and to develop a foundation produced crops were barley at 16% and for sustainable democratic growth. After soybeans at 9% of cultivated land.xxviii the 1945 Yalta Conference, where the US, The USAMGIK aimed to win the Soviet Union, China and Great Britain favor of civilians through its rice discussed terms for a four-power collection program. Because basic trusteeship over Korea, the US and Soviet necessities such as food and clean water Union came to occupy the southern and were scarce after World War II, the northern halves of the Korean peninsula USAMGIK sought to produce an along the 38th parallel respectively. The agricultural surplus that could provide for stakes in Korea were high for America all southern Koreans. American because the US could not afford to “lose authorities believed that such a scenario Korea to the Soviets” and jeopardize its would convince Koreans of the merits of position, primarily in Japan, to halt the the US developmental model. xxix They spread of communism in the Far East.xxv consequently worked to ensure that rice It was imperative for the USAMGIK to was effectively gathered and distributed build a democratic and capitalist base that throughout the south. They needed an could contain and delegitimize the Soviet- estimated four million tons of rice to meet led communist system in northern Korea. the demands of southern Koreans. xxx The US could not tolerate any element of Although imports of food from the US communist support in southern Korea curtailed the amount by several thousand because of its Cold War agenda. tons, the rice program served as the main channel for food collection and BUILDING A RICE ECONOMY distribution. The cooperation of Korean farmers was essential because over 80% of Establishing a nationwide rice southern Koreans at the time lived in rural collection program was one of the first farmland areas. Seoul had the least crucial steps that the US took to carry out number of planted rice paddies at 437 its mission in southern Korea. By while the rural provinces of Jeolla stimulating the production of rice and (353,996), Gyeongsang (340,134), and other grains, the USAMGIK aimed to Chungcheong (214,451) had the most.xxxi boost the south’s economy so that it could In order to gain support for rice compete with development of the production, the USAMGIK encouraged communist north. Since virtually all of the mass participation through public peninsula’s heavy industries, power plants statements such as “the future of Korea is and mineral deposits were concentrated in dependent on the successful collection of northern Korea at the time, the summer grains and rice!”xxxii USAMGIK
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 5! personnel also distributed printed been operated by Japanese executives. manuscripts, such as The Farmers Weekly, The USAMGIK passed laws to change to educate farmers about how the US titles of Japanese firms to Korean names. aimed to address Korea’s economic For example, they renamed the Chosen situation. Food Company to the Korea Commodity The rice collection program Corporation, the Oriental Development functioned by assigning rice collection Company to the New Korea Company, quotas to each province in southern and the Chosen Import Materials Control Korea. Following each harvest season, Corporation to the Materials Control farmers in each province had to transfer Company. xxxvi The USAMGIK believed their shares of rice to local bureaus that that the southern economy would fall were supervised by US authorities. The dangerously behind the developments of USAMGIK’s task was then to distribute the communist north without the help of the supplies of rice throughout the south these agencies.xxxvii to feed as many Koreans as possible. In Although several farmers complied order to facilitate the process, US officials with the USAMGIK’s rice collection employed law-enforcement units from the program, many were reluctant to Korean National Police (KNP) and participate. Those most opposed were volunteers from youth groups to ensure Korean leaders of local people’s that all rice quotas were met. The committees. Since the USAMGIK banned particular duties of these units were to the preexisting system of rice collection arrest farmers who failed to meet their that had been established by people’s shares and to detain agitators who sought committees after the end of colonial rule, to subvert the overall collection program. committee leaders who continued to Rewards such as ration cards and credit collect rice were arrested and often slips were also handed out as incentives harassed by USAMGIK personnel. for farmers to meet their rice quotas. American authorities refused to recognize The USAMGIK activated several people’s committees as governing bodies institutions in the agricultural sector to because only the USAMGIK was help with the overall collection effort. appointed to govern southern Korea by Many of these institutions continued rice the supreme commander of the Allied collection practices from the former Powers.xxxviii The USAMGIK asserted the Japanese colonial-state. xxxiii For example, primacy of its rice collection program over when the New Korea Company was all preexisting systems. Rice in instituted by the USAMGIK in unauthorized transit or on sale in other November 1945, its assignment, just like than USAMGIK distribution channels during the colonial period, was to make was confiscated.xxxix rice crop estimates for the purpose of Many people’s committee leaders assigning and collecting rice quotas. xxxiv and other Korean nationalists aimed to Although the USAMGIK understood that counteract the rice collection program of the use of this colonial-state apparatus the USAMGIK through two main means. would displease many Koreans, they One was by engaging in propaganda chose to revive it for efficiency: American warfare to slander the USAMGIK and to officials deemed the former colonial-state persuade farmers to support their cause. mode of rice collection to be the most They repeatedly accused the USAMGIK efficient and pragmatic at the time. xxxv of seeking to turn Korea into an American Among the 212 large companies turned colony. After the USAMGIK revived over to the USAMGIK, 195 of them had several colonial-state institutions to collect
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 6! rice, the dissidents exploited the situation traitors and collaborators like the Koreans by declaring that Americans, like former who were accused of the same Japanese colonialists, were looking to transgressions during the Japanese exploit Korean farmers and laborers. xl colonial period. One leaflet read, “We They propagated messages such as produce more rice than we eat, and many “American imperialists are trying to turn people are starving to death. Why?” The Korea into a slave of the US!” and “We faithful dogs of Japan, who oppressed us must oppose becoming slaves of in the past, now have new masters. They monopoly capitalism!”xli They also spread turned into faithful dogs of America and messages through leaflets, posters and are killing our brethren with crueler word of mouth that the USAMGIK was methods.” xlvii Another flyer read, “We shipping Korean rice out of Korea to feed have to oppose the pro-Japanese in the Americans and Japanese. According to grain collection program. These one propaganda manuscript, the scoundrels are enriching their pockets USAMGIK had allegedly been caught while farmers are starving and suffering. trying to ship out Korean rice from The time for Korean independence is Inchon in oil barrels.xlii The dissidents also when the pro-Japanese die!” xlviii The discouraged Koreans from eating food propaganda messages resonated deeply handed by US servicemen. They spread with the Korean populace because many rumors that the USAMGIK was Korean employees of the USAMGIK distributing food that caused infertility for were in fact known for their past treachery women and brain damage for children.xliii with colonial authorities. xlix For example, America’s goal, they claimed, was to over 80% of KNP officers in middle-to- control Koreans by limiting their physical high ranked positions had served as law- and mental capabilities. enforcement officers for the Japanese The propaganda efforts ultimately Governor-General. l They provided the convinced many Korean farmers, resistance movement with a strong basis especially in the Gyeongsang provinces, to for effective propaganda to hate the stop transferring rice to American police. According to Korean dissidents, authorities. Many farmers recognized these “racial traitors” and their “Japanese people’s committees as governing bodies, imperialistic ideas” were preventing paid taxes to committee leaders, and Korea’s complete independence. If the demanded the US to “turn over control to interests of workers and farmers were not the people’s committees.”xliv Although the considered, then Koreans, they claimed, rice collection program helped to improve would become “slaves” of another Korea’s food situation, rice production “colonial economic system all over remained below targeted levels and again.”li required an increased importation of raw Propaganda warfare led to the other materials.xlv The dire situation prompted means through which the dissidents the New York Times to publish an article defied the USAMGIK—acts of public under the header “Korea’s Rice Bowl has protest. The propaganda campaign Hunger Crisis: Largest Producer is convinced many students and young Poorest Fed because of Terrorism and individuals of left-wing or poor families to Failed Quotas.”xlvi demonstrate against the USAMGIK. Another goal of the propaganda Although some of the youths did not campaign was to criticize Korean know what they were protesting, their employees of the USAMGIK. The actions nevertheless demoralized US dissidents classified them as national servicemen and encouraged other
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 7!
Koreans to join their cause.lii During the kilogram of grain to any place outside of autumn months of 1946 in particular, Korea.”lvii They accused the dissidents of thousands of farmers partook in mass smuggling rice to sell in black markets in uprisings that resulted in the deaths of Japan. American authorities also accused nearly 200 policemen. Many farmers the dissidents of exploiting young refrained from fulfilling their rice quotas students who were “too young and too because they preferred the rationing immature” to know what they were systems of people’s committees. They also doing. lviii They issued statements saying did not want to give in to the rice- that the dissidents were harming the collecting policemen who had “wronged” interests of the Korean people by them in the past. KNP units often pursuing their own selfish interests. The encountered violent retaliation when they USAMGIK called on Koreans to help tried to arrest non-compliant farmers. The stamp out and correct the “many ills in anti-police riots broke down the morale Korea” by cutting off ties with the and discipline of policemen and deterred resistance movement. For example, it them from fully performing their duties.liii encouraged Koreans to report “unofficial” Korean dissidents also concentrated their rice collection programs to US officials so attacks on revived colonial-state agencies. that contraband could be seized and put One flyer directly told demonstrators to in proper channels.lix “concentrate your attacks on the pro- The USAMGIK intensified its Japanese New Korea Company.” liv The suppression efforts against the insurgents. dissidents likewise targeted Korean One common tactic of law-enforcing farmers who partook in the USAMGIK’s units was to enter the homes of non- rice collection program. One leaflet compliant farmers to search for hidden written in blood-red script read, “The man supplies of rice. Other tactics served to who completes his quota is the enemy.”lv intimidate and blackmail farmers until The resistors told the USAMGIK they reached their quotas or to classify that the attacks would stop only if a new non-compliant farmers in official records crop distribution system, similar to the as “communists” to be blacklisted. lx one developed by the Soviets in the north, Although law-enforcing units were not was established in the south. This was not allowed to search homes nor seize because they wanted to further Soviet property without a warrant, ordinance 176 interests. Rather, it was because the excused such actions if there was method of production in the north was “reasonable ground to believe that there perceived as a model that could maintain has been, is being, or is about to be Korea’s political independence and committed therein a crime punishable by freedom from capitalist exploitation. lvi one year imprisonment or graver Such a model was attractive to many penalty.” lxi The ordinance allowed the Koreans who had endured poverty and USAMGIK to incarcerate thousands of hardship under the capitalist system of the non-compliant farmers until their families Japanese colonial-state. brought in enough rice to satisfy their Yet because of America’s Cold War quotas. Many Koreans began to regard agenda, the USAMGIK refused to give in law-enforcing units as “goon squads” to the resistance movement and because men in uniform continued to responded in several ways. American commit physical assaults against authorities rebuked the propaganda Koreans.lxii Many Koreans began to hate messages of the dissidents, claiming that and fear USAMGIK personnel after they the USAMGIK did not ship “even one learned about these occurrences. The
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 8!
USAMGIK admitted that a percentage of to confiscate their property. lxvi They the concerns of the people were maneuvered to secure positions of power warranted.lxiii in the US-led system and informed occupation authorities that Korea would DEMOCRATIZATION AND become communist if leftist leaders KOREANIZATION assumed power. Because of America’s Cold War One of the core objectives of the imperatives and ease of communication USAMGIK was to democratize and with English-speaking rightwing “Koreanize” political institutions in politicians, the USAMGIK selected right- southern Korea. American authorities leaning leaders to serve as committee concluded that an anti-communist members of most bureaucracies. lxvii The ideology was not the sole answer because rightwing Korean Democratic Party it only created an appearance of social (KDP) secured the most positions among order. A vigorous and successful active political parties, getting sixteen out democratic policy had to be instituted to of eighty-one representatives into eliminate the communist threat and administrative offices. All but one of the resistance movement. lxiv American eight bureaucracies included members of occupation forces had to move quickly the KDP, three of whom were chairmen: because the US trusteeship in Korea was Kwansu Park of the Legislative and to end in no later than five years Judicial Department, Do Yeon Kim of the according to the 1945 Potsdam Fiscal and Economic Department and Jin Declaration. Their main goal before they Cheol Jeon of the Foreign Affairs and withdrew was to construct a National National Defense Department. lxviii The Assembly—a nationally-elected legislative National Society for Rapid Realization of body that could function as an interim Korean Independence (NSRRKI) had the government until a Korean chief of state second highest number of rightwing was elected. representatives with twelve. The majority The USAMGIK assembled an of others were members of right-of-center advisory council made up of Korean groups or non-affiliates of political leaders on October 5, 1945 to access the parties.lxix political situation of southern Korea. The right-leaning advisory council Leftist leaders, such as Yo Un-Hyong, urged American authorities to allow the refrained from participating in the council National Assembly, rather than the because they did not want to recognize a people, to elect the first president of foreign authority over their provisional South Korea. Rightwing leaders believed governments.lxv They sought to nationalize that a general election would result in a industries, reform landholdings, purge leftist victory. lxx Members of the KDP colonial state collaborators and exercise especially wanted Syngman Rhee as chief sovereignty through their own of state because of his opposition to leftist government systems. Rightwing leaders, agendas. They offered Rhee financial however, embraced the USAMGIK, using support and relied on him to prevent their resources and English language skills leftist leaders from seizing their land and to form a coalition with American industries. Rightwing leaders also told the authorities. Landowners and USAMGIK that Korea would become entrepreneurs of the Right used the communist if Syngman Rhee did not USAMGIK as a means to protect their become president. Although US officials capital against leftist leaders who sought were cautious about their support for
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 9! rightwing groups and Syngman Rhee, they occupation. American authorities also told agreed with the Right and decided to hold election committee members to make sure a general election to select only that all eligible Koreans, both men and representatives for the National Assembly. women, had equal opportunities to vote. In accordance with rightwing proposals, Because men usually made decisions on the task of the National Assembly was to behalf of their households, American draft a constitution and elect the executive officials were concerned that wives and branch of South Korea. lxxi The children would not be able to make their USAMGIK nevertheless prioritized the own decisions. lxxiv They advised election election of National Assembly members, committee members to sufficiently promoting the process as a framework for instruct women and young adults in order future democratic elections. to convince their husbands and fathers The USAMGIK enacted a general that they were capable of voting. franchise law on November 15, 1946 in American officials also encouraged order to prescribe qualifications for Koreans to participate in the election voters. Koreans could register to vote if through public statements and media they were born of Korean parents, twenty prints. They gave speeches through radio one years of age and were listed in a and posted large displays about the Korean family register. They could not election on billboards, walls, street posts vote if they were mentally ill or convicted and buses. They even published of crime against citizens or the instructions on how to register and vote in government. In addition, the USAMGIK cartoon form for illiterate Koreans. denied Koreans the right to vote if they According to a national estimation, about were guilty of collaboration with Japanese 80% of the Korean population was authorities.lxxii Election officials commonly illiterate at the time. lxxv A high voter disenfranchised Koreans if their family turnout rate was imperative for the registers indicated wrongdoings for either USAMGIK because a poor showing offense. They also scrutinized the names, would substantiate claims that the addresses, occupations and household elections were illegitimate and not owners of Korean registrants. representative of the Korean American officials hired several population.lxxvi Korean leaders to work as election The USAMGIK dispatched law- committee members during the election enforcement units from the KNP and process. Their main duties were to other constabulary forces to provide instruct Korean citizens on registration security and protection. Korean affiliates and voting procedures as well as to of the USAMGIK also mobilized youth administer local polling sites on election organizations, such as the Northwest day. They gave lectures in public places, Youth Corps, the Dae Han Labor such as schools and auditoriums, and Organization and the Federation of Labor distributed printed copies of election laws Unions for the Rapid Realization of to voters in every district. The USAMGIK Korean Independence, to assist in matters aimed to redefine the term “election” in of the national election. One of their main Korea because many Koreans were duties was to prevent violence and accustomed to “voting for whomever sabotage by anti-election activists. They Japanese supported” during the elections were stationed around voting sites to of the colonial era.lxxiii Teaching Koreans prevent attacks by dissidents and to about American-style democratic elections ensure safe transport of ballot boxes and was one of the major objectives of the US booklets. The USAMGIK also issued
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 10! orders to keep law-enforcing units a preferred democracy to communism. The minimum distance of 100 meters from USAMGIK even claimed that the election polling places, hoping to prohibit them results were “indirectly representative” of from using coercion to force northern Korea because about one-eighth registration.lxxvii US officials sent checklists of the total votes were made by Koreans to district leaders to ensure that the in the south who had recently come from elections were conducted in free and open the north.lxxxii atmospheres. The USAMGIK was US authorities further highlighted adamant about holding legitimate the success of the election by stressing the elections in southern Korea. failures of the Korean resistance The results of the first national movement. They emphasized that the election exceeded the expectations of the election produced a favorable outcome USAMGIK. The final tally reached a despite the dissidents’ attempts to deter turnout rate of about 90% among eligible Koreans from voting. Many terrorists Korean voters. The USAMGIK armed with rifles, grenades, homemade interpreted the outcome as a positive sign bombs and bamboo spears had harassed that Koreans could one day manage their eligible voters during the election process. own democratic form of government.lxxviii Several of them stationed themselves on American officials were especially hills around voting sites and fired their surprised by the fact that a little less than guns at voters. lxxxiii Others set off half of the final tally consisted of female explosives in polling places to destroy voters. One US authority declared at a ballot boxes and to discourage election post-election conference that “Korean committee members. Several polling women have proven themselves places reported that their registration outstanding.”lxxix books were stolen or destroyed by Yet what impressed US authorities terrorists. lxxxiv The homes of election the most was the fact that every election committee members were also common winner was an opponent of communism. sites of terrorism during the election The 200 member body of successful process. Dissidents threw grenades and candidates primarily composed of dynamite into the living quarters of individuals from rightwing groups, such as several officers and chairmen. One the National Society for Rapid Realization election committee leader was found shot of Korean Independence (57), the Korean and decapitated in his home in Ulsan. Democratic Party (29), the Tai Dong The resistance movement had also Youth Association (13), and the National used propaganda during the election Youth Group (6). The others declared process to spread its message. Students themselves as neutral or without party and members of leftist groups distributed affiliation. None of the candidates from handbills opposing the election. Park Hun the Women’s National Party won a seat in Young and other oppositionists published the National Assembly. The KDP had the magazines, such as The People’s Friend, The highest success rate, getting about a third Front-line of Democracy and The People’s Korea, of their candidates elected for office.lxxx to oppose the election.lxxxv Some of them US officials commended the KDP for advised citizens to spurn or even murder “maturing into political manhood” and candidates from rightwing groups. Other becoming one of the leading parties of forms of propaganda threatened to harm southern Korea.lxxxi They also regarded the Koreans looking to vote. One handbill overwhelming selection of right-leaning read that they would “give the knife of candidates as proof that Koreans justice” to anyone who tried to vote.lxxxvi
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 11!
Another leaflet declared “If you register to partake in the voting process. Many vote, then our country will forever be a polling places and rice distribution sites colony of America!”lxxxvii were, in fact, stationed together on The efforts of the dissidents, election day. Because voters needed to however, ultimately failed to achieve their show their family registration booklets, desired effect. American authorities which were primarily used to obtain ration detained hundreds of agitators and cards, in order to vote, the USAMGIK deterred many others from attacking combined the two activities at one site in polling sites. The mere presence of order to accomplish both tasks at the American soldiers in “hot spots” same time.xcii This meant that those who prevented occurrences of terrorism. lxxxviii did not vote were likely to miss their Korean dissidents rarely attacked polling ration cards that month. According to the sites or voters if American soldiers were testimonies of several Korean dissidents, nearby. Moreover, among the 8.2 million it was common to see Korean voters, eligible voters, 7.7 million ended up right before they received their ration registering and 7.1 million eventually cards, vote for whomever the ration card casted their ballots. lxxxix More than two- distributors recommended.xciii thirds of major political institutions in The dissidents also claimed that the southern Korea underwent reforms to conditions of voting sites were align with the results of the election unacceptable. Not all voters marked their process. The USAMGIK transferred ballots in privately enclosed booths as nearly all judicial, legislative and outlined in official USAMGIK guidelines. administrative powers to Koreans. The There were no curtains to screen voting National Assembly wrote the first booths from the public’s gaze in more constitution and elected the executive than half of the 62 voting precincts.xciv branch of South Korea—the president, Most voters filled out their ballots on vice president and prime minister. The tables in front of USAMGIK personnel. aim of the USAMGIK was to transfer the Although the duties of law-enforcing units entire administrative process to Koreans.xc were said to help preserve peace and order US General John Hodge proclaimed that at voting sites, they nevertheless restricted “the tremendous vote polled by patriotic the freedom of voters. xcv Several and freedom loving citizens in the United policemen and defense corps units, States zone is an unprecedented victory sometimes in uniform, stood inside for democracy over the all-out efforts of polling stations. The dissidents resented communist directed propaganda, the fact that employees of the USAMGIK terrorism and wanton slaughter.” xci The and rightist groups “helped” voters USAMGIK interpreted the election complete their ballots.xcvi Although some results as proof that Koreans preferred Koreans such as the illiterate genuinely the US developmental model. needed help with their ballots, many Many Korean dissidents, however, voters, especially women, experienced refused to recognize the outcome of the pressures to vote quickly and for election, claiming that it was whomever their helpers recommended.xcvii unrepresentative of southern Koreans for The dissidents accused the police of several reasons. First, they argued that interfering in political matters by favoring USAMGIK workers coerced eligible one side to the detriment of the other. voters into voting. They claimed that They also viewed defense corps groups as civilians were denied ration cards by gangs dominated by rightist elements.xcviii provincial authorities if they did not
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 12!
The resistors also argued that the supported or had already established eligibility requirements to vote rendered provisional governments before the entry the voters partial towards the interests of of US occupation forces. Jeong Eun Bo, the USAMGIK. They claimed that select for example, wanted to give all political Koreans were purposely labeled as power to people’s committees. Young Mo “criminals” to deny them the right to Jung likewise aimed to give political power vote. xcix Koreans who partook in past to people’s committees so that they could uprisings against USAMGIK operations, initiate reforms that mirrored those in the such as those during the autumn uprisings north.ciii of 1946, had indeed been disenfranchised. American authorities disapproved Many of their family members were also that leftist leaders refused their invitation denied the right to vote. In addition, the to participate in the election. They dissidents claimed that the USAMGIK attempted to build a coalition between was being selective about political right and left wing parties in order to participation, citing as proof the exclusion implement government programs with the of Jeju province from the first conference support of all political parties. civ But of the National Assembly. The because major leftist leaders continued to USAMGIK did not recognize Jeju in the resist, the USAMGIK accused them of conference because of its “small vote as a blocking Korean unification and Korea’s result of communist violence.”c American progress toward democratic self-rule. cv authorities regarded provincial leaders of Leftist leaders abstained from the Jeju as “Soviet Stooges” who were elections because they did not want to opposing USAMGIK directives because delegitimize their political platforms by of communist inclinations. They claimed recognizing foreign authority. Moreover, that evidence of communist infiltration according to official reports from election from the north was a firmly established committees, much of the Korean public fact. ci Koreans dissidents accused the became apathetic about the election once USAMGIK of hypocrisy and of holding they realized that some of the top political elections that were fair only in name. leaders were not participating. cvi Many The resistance movement also Koreans were disappointed because rejected the election results because the “persons who should be there” were election process did not include all major omitted and “those who should not be political leaders. The most obvious there” were included. cvii absences, for example, were those of Kim Ku and Kim Kyu-sik. They both withheld CONCLUSION from the elections because they opposed the idea of having a national election that The counterinsurgency operation of did not include northern Koreans. The the USAMGIK may be regarded as a two Kims also rejected America’s plan for success when considering the results after Trusteeship and separate elections in its occupation in Korea. It is true that the Korea.cii There were also very few left-of- campaign boosted rice production levels center candidates who had run for office. after the USAMGIK instituted a For example, Jeong Eun Bo of the South nationwide rice collection program, which Korean Labor Party, Young Mo Jung of included suppressing its resistors. It is also the People’s Revolutionary Party, and true that the campaign helped to establish Dong Gyu Park of the Democratic Young the first nationally-elected legislative body Men’s Alliance all withheld from running. on May 10, 1948, which then founded the They refused to participate because they Republic of Korea on August 15, 1948.
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 13!
Yet many of the effects of the campaign, the USAMGIK were revived institutions according to the counterinsurgency from the prior colonial era. Consequently, perspective, suggest that it was unable to many Korean citizens refrained from eliminate the root causes of insurgency. partaking in USAMGIK programs if they The use of coercion—though effective in were run by collaborators or colonial-state suppressing insurgents in the short- apparatus. They maintained that pro- term—evoked deep repulsion among Japanese elements in government would many Koreans. Although the USAMGIK dissuade Koreans from serving the frequently repeated the slogan “In a country.cix Although American authorities democracy heads are counted, not were aware of the situation, their need for broken,” the US occupation experience highly trained personnel led them to hire suggests that heads were broken and not former employees of the Japanese counted. Farmers were often beaten, colonial-state. Men who had worked for thrown into prison, tortured or the Japanese Governor-General were blackmailed if they failed to meet their rice trained in the bureaucracy since there was collection quotas. Many Koreans were little incentive to find the resources to also disenfranchised or coerced into newly train other men. voting for select candidates in the first The first Republic of Korea lacked national election. A high-ranking US the public’s trust. Many Koreans felt a official even admitted that “it cannot be sense of failure for being unable to claim claimed that there was no intimidation, no sovereignty for their own country.cx They force, used to influence the people.” cviii did not view the national legislative body The use of these measures can be as being truly representative of the South attributed to the USAMGIK’s Cold War Korean population. In addition, they were agenda. reluctant to comply with state orders that Another shortcoming of the overall were issued and enforced by national campaign was the USAMGIK’s inability traitors, and many were still sympathetic to win the hearts of the Korean masses. to the political cause of the resistance American authorities attempted to frame movement. Although the USAMGIK their objectives in ways to appeal to the managed to suppress many of the Korean people. In the economic sphere, dissidents, the spirit of the resistance the USAMGIK reiterated to the Korean movement lingered and later manifested public that rice was being produced and itself in uprisings, for example, in Jeju and collected only for domestic consumption. Yeosu provinces. These uprisings American authorities also echoed mirrored many of the insurrectionary statements that developing Korea into an elements from before—they were independent, unified nation was their instigated by Koreans who wanted to highest priority. Yet many of the manage their own crops rather than employees and institutions of the partake in the government’s rice collection USAMGIK had difficulties working with program, and they were prompted by the people. Many citizens viewed Korean dissidents who wanted to revenge on affiliates of the USAMGIK as “national Korean servicemen who had wronged traitors” or unwanted remnants of the them during the colonial era. former Japanese colonial-state. And The Korean War may also be indeed, many Korean policemen and thought of as an extension of bureaucrats had cooperated with Japanese insurrectionary conflict. When seen from authorities during the colonial era. Also, a the perspective of revolutionary warfare, high percentage of the institutions used by the Korean War was the terminus of a
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 14! three stage conflict—terrorism, guerrilla !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! warfare, and full-scale war. cxi Koreans xv Samuel Huntington, Changing Patterns of Military Politics, 575. continued to oppose the US-led xvi David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare. 185. government system in South Korea in xvii Ibid. 188. part because of their desire to prevent xviii Eliot Cohen, “Principles, Imperatives, and Paradoxes of Counterinsurgency.” Military Review (2006): 95. Koreans with questionable pasts from xix David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare. 187. attaining political power. America’s xx Bruce Hoffman, “Insurgency and Counterinsurgency persistent support for those Koreans laid in Iraq” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29 (2006): 106. xxi Ibid. the foundation for insurrection and civil xxii cxii Samuel Huntington, Changing Patterns of Military war in Korea. Furthermore, the Politics, 575. insurgents in the South may have “lost” xxiii Mao Tse-tung, On Guerrilla Warfare. 150. xxiv Carl von Clausewitz, On War (Princeton: Princeton South Korea to the USAMGIK in 1948, University Press, 1976), 481. but they continued to try to “win” the xxv US Nation Security Council, “NSC 68: US Objectives Korean peninsula even after the and Programs for National Security,” April 14, 1950. xxvi Statement on Independence and Unification of establishment of the ROK. Korea. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xxvii John Kerry King, “Rice Politics” Foreign Affairs 31 (1953): 453. i The World News (Seke Shinmun). Office of Civil xxviii Agricultural Production Goals. 24 January 1947. Information, USAFIK. 47. 22 May 1948. Mikun Department of Agriculture. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Yo nʾguso, 1996. ii Prasenjit Duara, “The Global and Regional xxix Talk by American Chief, Bureau of Agriculture Lt. Constitution of Nations” Nations and Nationalism 14 Col. Joyner. Gun Soo Meeting. 16 September 1946. (1999): 28. Summer Grain and Rice Collection Program. Mikun iii Ibid., 24. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) iv Michel Foucault, Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology ʻ (New York: New Press, 1998), 375. Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaep an Kirok, 1946-1948. v Dong-Choon Kim, The Unending Korean War (Larkspur: Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Tamal Vista Publications, 2000), 35. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. vi Namhee Lee, The Making of Minjung (Ithica: Cornell xxx Facts on food, 10 October 1946. Mikun Jo nggi University Press, 2009), 5. Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, vii Gi-Wook Shin, “A Critique of Colonial Modernity in 1945. 6 - 1948. 8. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Korea.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41 (1999): Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. 794-796. xxxi Department of Agriculture: Agriculture Production viii See David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare (Chicago: Goals. 24 January 1947 Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo ABC Clio, 2006); Bernard Fall, “The Theory and Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Practice of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency.” Naval Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do War College Review 51 (1998): 46-57; Samuel Huntington, Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Changing Patterns of Military Politics (New York: The Free Yo nʾguso, 1996. Press, 1990); Mao Tse-tung, On Guerrilla Warfare (New xxxii Summer Grain and Rice Collection Program. 16 York: Praeger, 1961); Eliot Cohen, “Principles, September 1946. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Imperatives, and Paradoxes of Counterinsurgency.” Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Military Review (2006). Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do ix Samuel Huntington, Changing Patterns of Military Politics Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa (New York: The Free Press, 1990), 560. Yo nʾguso, 1996. x Ibid., 557. xxxiii Statement by Office of National Food xi David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare (Chicago: ABC Administration on National Food Regulation. 18 August Clio, 2006), 185. 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu xii Samuel Huntington, Changing Patterns of Military Politics, (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 562. 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim xiii David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare, 190. ʾ xiv Mao Tse-tung, On Guerrilla Warfare (New York: Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo n guso, 1996. xxxiv Praeger, 1961), 145. Collection of Rice. 18 August 1947. Office of National Food Administration. Mikun Jo nggi
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 15!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Yo nʾguso, 1996. xxxv Letter to General John R. Hodge on Conditions in xlvi “Korea’s Rice Bowl has Hunger Crisis: Largest Korea. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John Producer is Poorest Fed because of Terrorism and R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Failure of Quotas.” New York Times. 27 Apr. 1947, Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa English ed.: Print. Yo nʾguso, 1995. xlvii Death from Starvation, Massacre, and xxxvi Letter to Archer Lerch from Pyeong Koo Yoon. Imprisonment. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8. Kangwo n-do Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Yo nʾguso, 1996. xxxvii Labor Policy in Korea. 11 September 1947. Mikun xlviii Inspecting Office, Masan Detachment. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Yo nʾguso, 1995. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. xxxviii Statement from the Commanding General John R. xlix Letter to General John R. Hodge from Kim Myun Hodge. 12 December 1945. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Un. 22 October 1945. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. xxxix Statement by Office of National Food l Bruce Cumings, The Origins of the Korean War, Vol. 1 Administration on National Food Regulation. 18 August (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), 166. 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu li Farmer’s Association. File no. 179-27. 23 August 1946. (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, Mikun CIC Cho ngbo Pogoso .RG 319 Office of the 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Chief of Military History. So ul: Chungang Ilbosa Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Hyo ndaesa Yo nʼguso, 1996. xl Propagation Section of South Cholla Committee of lii Communist Schols and Education Programs. 3 July Korean Communism. 15 August 1946. Mikun CIC 1946. Mikun CIC Cho ngbo Pogoso .RG 319 Office of Cho ngbo Pogoso .RG 319 Office of the Chief of Military the Chief of Military History. So ul: Chungang Ilbosa History. So ul: Chungang Ilbosa Hyo ndaesa Hyo ndaesa Yo nʼguso, 1996. Yo nʼguso, 1996. liii Special Press Release. 31 August 1946. Mikun Jo nggi xli Memorandum to Colonel Gillette: Circulars Being Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, Distributed in Chinhae and Kimhae. 27 January 1948. 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946- liv Documents Taken From Homes of Arrested Riot- 1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Agitators. 11 November 1946. Mikun CIC Cho ngbo Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Pogoso .RG 319 Office of the Chief of Military History. xlii Kwangju CIC Report on Handbill Disseminated in So ul: Chungang Ilbosa Hyo ndaesa Yo nʼguso, Kwangju by South Korean Labor Party. 24 January 1996. 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu lv Found Leftist Leaflet. USAMGIK Office of Civil (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, Affairs. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do xliii Chief of Police Division: About a Rumor without Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Any Base. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Yo nʾguso, 1996. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae lvi Charles Armstrong, The North Korean Revolution (Ithaca: Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Cornell University Press, 2004), 136. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa lvii Denying Anti-US Propaganda Rumors. 11 November Yo nʾguso, 1996. 1946. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. xliv Communist Propaganda. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Yo nʾguso, 1995. lviii Warning to Stop Riots. 23 October 1946. Mikun Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Yo nʾguso, 1996. Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do xlv The World News Published by Office of Civil Information, USAFIK. 41. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 16!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Yo nʾguso, 1995. Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do lix Statement of Lieutenant General John R. Hodge to Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa the Korean People. 3 January 1946. Mikun Jo nggi Yo nʾguso, 1996. Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, lxxiii Public Apathy Toward Elections. 29 March 1948. 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946- lx Military Governor, Major Wallace. Rice Collection in 1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Hamyang Gun. 14 January 1946. Bureau of Public Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Works. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu lxxiv Ibid. (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, lxxv Letter to Harold Snyder from John Hodge. Mikun 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do lxi The World News Published by Office of Civil Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Information, USAFIK. 41. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Yo nʾguso, 1995. Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n lxxvi All Branch Managers, OCI. 26 March 1948. Mikun Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Yo nʾguso, 1996. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo lxii To the Members of the American Forces in Korea. 3 Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. March 1946. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji lxxvii Report of Trip to Election Districts. 29 April 1948. (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n- Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946- Yo nʾguso, 1995. 1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim lxiii Letter to Major Louis B. Atkinson from F.E. Gillette. Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. 11 June 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. lxxviii Headquarters 98th Military Government, 14 May Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae 1948. Report on Election, USAMGIK. Mikun Jo nggi Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Yo nʾguso, 1996. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo lxiv Memorandum on Korea. 28 May 1947. Mikun Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) lxxix Message From Lieutenant General John R. Hodge Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do to the Ladies. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n- Yo nʾguso, 1995. do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa lxv Bruce Cumings, The Origins of the Korean War, Vol. 1 Yo nʾguso, 1995. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981). lxxx The World News (Seke Shinbo). Office of Civil lxvi Ibid. Information, USAFIK. 47. 22 May 1948. Mikun lxvii Memorandum on Korea. 28 May 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. ʾ Yo n guso, 1995. lxxxi Talk by General Arthur Brown at Second lxviii Revised Roster of Standing Committees of Interim Anniversary of Democratic Party of Korea. 16 Legislative Assembly. 20 March 1947. Mikun Jo nggi September 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. ʻ ʻ 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Ch unch o n-si: 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. lxix Ibid. lxxxii The World News (Seke Shinbo). Office of Civil lxx Memorandum for General Brown from Archer Information, USAFIK. 45. May 22, 1948. Mikun Lerch. 20 March 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. lxxi Policy for Korea. 18 July 1947. Mikun Jo nggi lxxxiii Abstract of Unusual Events from Inspection Team Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, Reports. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do lxxii The World News Published by Office of Civil Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Information, USAFIK. 41. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Yo nʾguso, 1996.
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 17!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lxxxiv Police Report. 10 May 1948. Mikun Jo nggi Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: xcvi Abstract of Unusual Events from Inspection Team Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Reports. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. lxxxv Detailed Report Baesd on Facts Relative to the Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Attempted Riot of 15th August 1947. 13 October 1947. Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Yo nʾguso, 1996. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa xcvii Report on Election. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Yo nʾguso, 1995. Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n lxxxvi Threatening Letter. Interpreter for Chief Civil Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Affairs Office. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Yo nʾguso, 1996. Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do xcviii Labor Policy in Korea. 11 September 1947. Mikun Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Yo nʾguso, 1996. Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do lxxxvii Anti-Election Handbill. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Yo nʾguso, 1995. Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do xcix Exercising the Right to Vote. Mikun Jo nggi Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Yo nʾguso, 1996. Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. lxxxviii Supervision of Election. 30 April 1948. Mikun Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. c The World News (Seke Shinbo). Office of Civil Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Information, USAFIK. 49. May 22, 1948. Mikun Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) lxxxix Patrol Report. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa ci Special Press Release. 20 October 1947. Mikun Yo nʾguso, 1996. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) xc Memorandum for General Brown from Archer Lerch. Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do 20 March 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. Yo nʾguso, 1995. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo cii Trusteeship in Korea: Seoul Leaders Threaten to Fight Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Curb to Self-Rule. 3 January 1946. Mikun Jo nggi xci The World News (Seke Shinbo). Office of Civil Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, Information, USAFIK. 47. 22May 1948. Mikun Jo nggi 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. ciii Police Report. 3 March 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. xcii Ibid. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo xciii Headquarters USAMGIK 27 April. 1948. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Memorandum. Earl Rhodes Lt. Col. Adjutant General. civ Office of Economic Adviser. 21 June 1946. Mikun Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946- Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do 1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Yo nʾguso, 1995. xciv Abstract of Unusual Events from Inspection Team cv Warning to Stop Riots. 23 October 1946. Mikun Reports. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8.Kangwo n-do Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Yo nʾguso, 1996. cvi Public Apathy Toward Elections. 29 March 1948. xcv Summary of Eighteenth Week’s Activities of the Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. U.N. Temporary Commission on Korea. Mikun Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946- Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) 1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996.
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 18!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! cvii Strange Two-Sided Campaign Strategy. Maeil Duara, Prasenjit, “The Global and Regional Constitution Shinmoon (Daily News). 25 April 1948. Mikun Jo nggi of Nations.” Nations and Nationalism 14 (1999). Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Fall, Bernard. “The Theory and Practice of Insurgency Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. and Counterinsurgency.” Naval War College Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Review 51 (1998): 46-57. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Foucault, Michel. Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology. New cviii Report on Election. 14 May 1948. Mikun Jo nggi York: New Press, 1998. Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Galula, David. Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. Santa Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Barbra: ABC-Clio Inc., 2006. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Gi-Wook Shin, “A Critique of Colonial Modernity in Korea.” Comparative Studies in Society and History Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. 41 (1999) cix Memorandum for General Brown from Archer Hoffman, Bruce. “Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Lerch. 14 April 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Iraq.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29 (2006): Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 103-121. ʻ ʻ 8.Kangwo n-do Ch unch o n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Huntington, Samuel. Changing Patterns of Military Politics. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. New York: The Free Press, 1990. cx Namhee Lee, The Making of Minjung (Ithica: Cornell Kim, Dong-Choon. The Unending Korean War: A Social University Press, 2009). History. Larkspur: Tamal Vista Publications, cxi Samuel Huntington, Changing Patterns of Military Politics, 2000. 562. King, John Kerry, “Rice Politics” Foreign Affairs 31 cxii Memorandum to George Atcheson from Arthur (1953). Bunce. 23 January 1947. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Lee, Namhee. The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Charyojip.Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithica: 8.Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Cornell University Press, 2009. Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Shin, Gi-Wook. “A Critique of Colonial Modernity in Korea.” Comparative Studies in Society and History REFERENCES 41 (1999): 784-804. Tse-tung, Mao. On Guerrilla Warfare. New York: Praeger, PRIMARY SOURCES 1961.cxii
“Korean War Origins, 1945-1950,” Wilson Center Digital Archive: International History, http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/collecti on/134/korean-war-origins-1945-1950. Mikun CIC Cho ngbo PogosO . RG 319 Office of the Chief of Military History. So ul: Chungang Ilbosa Hyo ndaesa Yo nʼguso, 1996. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Chilletʻu (F.E. Gillette) Pogoso , Cho n Po m-dae Chaepʻan Kirok, 1946-1948. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1996. Mikun Jo nggi Cho ngbo Charyojip. Haji (John R. Hodge) Munso jip, 1945. 6 - 1948. 8. Kangwo n-do Chʻunchʻo n-si: Hallim Taehakkyo Asia Munhwa Yo nʾguso, 1995. Maeil Sinbo [Daily News]. 1945-1948. Seke Sinmun [World News]. 1945-1948.
SECONDARY SOURCES
Armstrong, Charles. The North Korean Revolution, 1945- 1950. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002. Cohen, Eliot. “Principles, Imperatives, & Paradoxes of Counterinsurgency.” Military Review (2006). Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945-1947. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981. Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War: The Roaring of the Cataract 1947-1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 19!
REGIME STABILITY OR MINERAL WEALTH? China’s Interest in Trade with North Korea Annie Meyjes Harvard University
ABSTRACT strove to maintain relations with its isolated neighbor to the northeast. During This paper explores the rapid rise in the Soviet era, communist nations bilateral trade between North Korea and (dominated by the Soviet Union and China between 2001 and 2012 from a China) accounted for 70 percent of North political and mineral policy perspective, Korea’s total trade volume. i Two major relying primarily upon the International events in the early 1990s, however, shifted Trade Centre’s Sino-DPRK trade data. It Sino-DPRK relations, including trade argues that Beijing’s North Korean trade patterns. The first was China’s decision to decisions were based upon a combination normalize diplomatic relations with South of a national foreign policy of Korean Korea, thereby hampering economic peninsular stability and a desire to increase relations with the North. Secondly, after economic development in the three the collapse of the Soviet Union and northeastern provinces bordering North Russia’s decision to require North Korea Korea. An analysis of provincial Chinese to pay for its trade in currency instead of actors also suggests that local leaders barter, China moved to do the same. This acted upon Beijing’s economic growth movement was paralleled by China’s targets by seeking to develop both desire to shift its relationship with North domestic mineral production as well as Korea to one based on trade instead of mineral and transport connections with aid.ii As a result, trade between the two North Korea. What is more, North nations plummeted. Korean minerals were attractive locally for Although economic interaction both the satisfaction of domestic demand between China and North Korea suffered and for arbitrage. The analysis presented during the 1990s, bilateral trade recovered in this paper provides insights into with force in the 2000s. The volume of Chinese decision-making at both the Sino-DPRK trade in the latter portion of national and local levels of government, as the last decade is unprecedented, even well as an understanding of implications taking into account China’s policy of for Sino-DPRK relations with the rise of trade-over-aid. Total bilateral trade rose Xi Jinping. 449 percent between 2000 and 2009 alone, compared to a fall of over 11 percent INTRODUCTION between 1995 and 2000.iii This paper seeks to determine the cause of the rapid North Korea and China have increase in trade between the two nations, shared a history based upon mutual and will posit two alternative explanations: struggle and communist ideology since one based upon Chinese foreign policy China’s sponsorship of North Korea in and the other on Chinese mineral policy. World War II and China’s support of the It will also refer to a third, overlapping North in the Korean War. When China alternative explanation, based upon opened to the world in the late 1970s, it
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 20!
Chinese northeastern provincial development interests.
Figure 1: DPRK Trade With its Two Largest Partnersiv
The first section of this paper will The first alternative explanation is outline the two primary alternative that the rise in Sino-DPRK bilateral trade explanations and the third overlapping has been the economic outcome of explanation. In the second section, it will shifting Chinese foreign policy since the then describe the frameworks of analysis early 1990s. This paper will rely upon the that will be used to judge which, if either, joint hypotheses of Bates Gill, John Park, of the two alternative explanations is Scott Snyder, and Drew Thompson to dominant. The third section will evaluate elucidate what will be referred to as the the two alternative explanations. Finally, “foreign policy alternative explanation.” the fourth will present conclusions and After Deng Xiaoping initiated draw implications for future Sino-DPRK economic reform and opening in China at relations. Ultimately, this paper will show the Third Plenum of 1978, North Korea the multifaceted nature of China’s became increasingly aware that China interests in North Korea: foreign and would seek to establish diplomatic mineral policy have each played a role in relations with its rival South Korea.v The driving increased Sino-DPRK trade since combination of China’s overarching policy the mid-2000s, as have China’s domestic goal of Peaceful Rise, as well as the economic development goals. As such, a demands of managing relations with both thorough understanding of the layers of North and South Korea meant that China China’s relationship with North Korea is would need stability on the Korean crucial to forecasting future relations Peninsula in order to continue developing between the two nations. economically. China has had several strategic desires in maintaining relations ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS with both nations. On the one hand, it is interested in retaining a communist ally in I. ECONOMIC OUTCOME OF the North and a buffer against US-South CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY Korean military forces. On the other, it fears the instability of a nuclear North
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 21!
Korea and a potential refugee crisis it reserves. North Korea is a mineral-rich would face should the North Korean country. The nation is estimated to have regime collapse (not to mention the the world’s largest supply of magnesite benefits of trade it receives from South (between three and four billion tons), hold Korea). Snyder asserts that after observing between two and four billion tons of iron the potential for a refugee influx into ore, and possess stores of rare earth northeastern China during North Korea’s metals in its Gyung-Sung and Hur-Chon Great Famine in the late 1990s, China regions.x North Korea’s mineral reserves sought to re-stabilize relations with the are so sizable, that analysis by Goohoon North. vi Relations between the two Kwon of Goldman Sachs Economic improved with a series of exchanges of Research has estimated that the total stock high-level officials in the early 2000s. vii of reserves is 140 times greater than China’s North Korea policy appeared to North Korea’s 2008 GDP, and its shift again in 2003 due to a confluence of development could cover the potential three key events: North Korea’s nuclear costs of a reunification with South test, the United States’ invasion of Iraq, Korea.xi Of particular relevance to China and Hu Jintao’s replacement of Jiang are North Korean coal and iron ore. Zemin as the leader of China. As John According to Gill, China’s imports of Park states, China became fearful that a North Korean coal rose 54 percent nuclear North Korea would be next on between 2009 and 2010, while iron ore the United States target list with the imports doubled over the same period.xii imposition of the Bush Doctrine. viii What is more, Thompson suggests that Increased threats of peninsular instability minerals collectively made up 41 percent drove China to expedite improved of all North Korean exports to China in relations with North Korea and re- 2008.xiii This paper will address whether stabilize the region. China’s North Korea China’s importation of North Korean policy under Hu Jintao came to embody minerals is coincidental, being simply the two key ideals: the denuclearization of easiest way to increase trade with North North Korea in the long-term, and more Korea as a product of foreign policy, or importantly, the stability of the Kim arises out of a targeted mineral policy goal regime. China came to believe that by of the Chinese government. economically supporting North Korea To do so, this paper posits three with trade (and also investment), it might distinct sources of Chinese interest in ensure the survival of the Kim regime.ix North Korean minerals. First, Chinese Ultimately, this would prevent a collapse commodity demand increased rapidly over scenario that would be disastrous in the the past decade as the country’s economic eyes of the Chinese, ensure peninsular growth skyrocketed. As described by stability, and allow China to continue Daniel Gearin, despite being the world’s undeterred on its Peaceful Rise. largest producer of many minerals, China faces a shortage in 19 of 45 major II. TARGETED INTEREST IN minerals. xiv Perhaps in the face of an NORTH KOREA’S MINERAL inability to sufficiently increase domestic RESOURCES supply, China turned to North Korean imports to compensate. Alternatively, the The second alternative explanation mid-2000s saw a global increase in posits that bilateral trade between North commodity market prices, as evidenced by Korea and China increased due to China’s a 191 percent increase in the Global specific interest in North Korea’s mineral Commodity Metal Price Index between
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 22!
2001 and 2012. xv This second rationale scrutiny, as evidenced by Hu’s “Plan of posits that China sought to either import Revitalizing China’s Northeast.”xviii Given North Korean minerals at below-market their shared borders with North Korea, prices for domestic consumption, or to Jilin and Liaoning in particular benefit turn to export them globally for profit. significantly from increased bilateral trade; Finally, China may have been stimulated Thompson suggests that 75% of North to seek North Korean minerals in an Korean trade passes through Liaoning effort to begin mineral stockpiling as province alone.xix Both provinces enhance rivals Japan and the United States sought their economic prospects significantly by to do the same. This paper will investigate utilizing their geographical comparative whether some combination of these three advantage with North Korea, and perhaps interests in North Korean natural advance their standing nationally as a resources led China to pursue increased result. The third domestic explanation will bilateral trade in the last decade. be referred to throughout this paper as a factor that overlaps both primary III. THIRD OVERLAPPING alternative explanations. EXPLANATION – CHINA’S NORTHEASTERN DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS OF ANALYSIS
Although this paper will seek to In order to discern which of the differentiate between the relative strength two alternative explanations is more of China’s foreign and mineral policies favorable, this paper will rely upon two toward North Korea, China has a third major frameworks of analysis and also domestic economic policy which overlaps several supplementary analyses. The first these two alternative explanations: the is a comparison of two financial models of development of its three northeastern Sino-DPRK trade. In one model, a chart provinces Jilin, Liaoning, and of North Korean exports to China will be Heilongjiang. After Chinese economic overlaid with relevant foreign policy reform began, the development of China’s events: political and diplomatic exchanges. southern and eastern regions took off, The second model will overlay the same leaving the stagnant northeastern chart of North Korean exports to China provinces behind. Cheng Li cites that with mineral-related events—major Liaoning, Heilongjiang, and Jilin’s Chinese investment deals in the North provincial ranks as industrial producers Korean mining sector and Chinese fell from 2nd, 7th, and 15th to 5th, 14th, and mineral policy directives. Both models will 18th, respectively, in subsequent years.xvi seek to determine whether there is a The fall in productivity of northeastern causal relationship between foreign or China can perhaps be attributed to mineral policy-related events and trade economic policy under Jiang Zemin, who outcomes via North Korean exports to focused more closely on generating record China. Trade data for this analysis will national economic growth rates and was come from the International Trade less concerned with the distribution of Centre, an UN-sponsored organization economic development. With Hu Jintao’s interested in developing economies’ assumption of China’s three-pronged trade. xx Information on political and leadership position, policy shifted more diplomatic exchanges will be drawn toward sustainable development. xvii This primarily from Bates Gill’s work, along meant that the three northeastern with a variety of secondary sources. The provinces came back under national North Korea Econ Watch blog, Chinese
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 23! policy directives obtained from scholarly to be different between actors within articles, Chinese news sources, and China. That is, the central government in provincial government websites will Beijing may be more focused on broader provide the data for the mineral analysis. regional stability in its relations with This framework of analysis will enable a North Korea, while officials in the local quantitative comparison between the provinces may be more concerned with foreign policy and mineral policy securing commodities at cheap prices. An alternative explanations. analysis of key actors within the Chinese The second major framework in political sphere will provide crucial insight this paper will be a qualitative analysis of into the motives of China in trade dealings national and local Chinese directives with North Korea. relating to foreign, economic, and mineral Given the dominant evidence in policy. These directives will be obtained favor of the foreign policy alternative from secondary source analyses (Fan and explanation delivered by the two primary KPMG), Chinese news releases on the frameworks of analysis, this paper will directives, and provincial government include a third framework consisting of websites. The policy directives will be supplementary evidence in favor of the analyzed to determine the intent of the mineral alternative explanation to provide Chinese government in its relations with completeness. Specifically, this paper will North Korea. In conjunction with close introduce an analysis of Chinese mineral readings of Chinese policy pieces, this exports and commodity market prices, as framework will also rely upon a study of well as a discussion of the Chinese coal the policy decision-making processes and market as it relates to North Korea. balance of power dynamics in the Chinese Together, the two primary frameworks of government. Scholarly articles will serve as analysis and the more minor elements will resources on these two elements. It is provide a collective picture of China’s important to note that intentions are likely aims in its relations with North Korea.
ASSESSMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS
I. COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL MODELS
Figure 2: Foreign Policy Financial Modelxxi
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 24!
Figure 2 above is a graphic Korea at the beginning of 2009 after a representation of North Korean exports stagnant 2006-2008 period. 2008 served as to China between 2001 and 2012 in a second key shock-year for the Chinese thousands of USD. Key foreign policy government in its North Korean relations events are numbered one through sixteen due to Kim Jong-Il’s stroke. Given (brackets represent events attributed to a evidence of Kim’s rapidly deteriorating year as opposed to a specified date), with health, China became increasingly aware each representing a visit between Sino- of the need for a leadership transition in DPRK senior officials, either in China or North Korea. As in 2003, the threat of North Korea. The first point of emphasis instability stimulated China’s desire to is that the only major official exchange increase exchanges. Most notably, Chinese not represented on this graph is Kim Premier Wen Jiabao led a large Chinese Jong-Il’s first visit to China in late May delegation to Pyongyang in October 2009, 2000 (not pictured due to lack of 2000 during which China and North Korea export data), emphasizing that relations signed a major agreement encompassing between the two countries were frosty up tourism, development, and education. until 2000. Two key trends can be Park argues that this visit was the deciphered from the chart itself. The first culmination of strong Chinese efforts to is the cluster of events between 2004 and increase relations with North Korea via 2006, and the second is the takeoff in trade. xxiii In addition to Wen Jiabao’s exchanges beginning in early 2009. The notable visit, Gill and Snyder collectively earlier period consists of visits between found 120 total diplomatic exchanges Kim Jong-Il and Hu Jintao, and also visits between the two nations in 2009 alone.xxiv made by North Korean senior legislator xxv Kim Yong Nam, Chinese Vice Premier Together, the 2004-06 and 2009 series of Wu Yi, and Commerce Minister Bo Xilai. events as illustrated by the foreign policy What can explain such a rapid financial model substantiate the first reconstitution of relations between alternative explanation. In the years before Chinese and North Korean senior officials both of these periods, China was after the deficiency between 2001 and presented with evidence of instability 2003? Although the Chinese became within the North Korean regime, and intent upon reestablishing diplomatic exchanges picked up between the two relations with North Korea by 2000, countries in the following years. As a observable changes to foreign policy (with result, after the 2004-2006 period of senior-official exchanges used as a proxy) exchanges, total North Korean exports to did not occur until after 2003. As China increased by 62.56 percent between previously suggested, two major events in 2006 and 2008. Following the pivotal 2003 constituted a shock to China in its 2009 period, North Korean exports to DPRK relations: North Korea conducted China increased 50.63 percent between its first nuclear test and the United States 2009 and 2010 alone. Given the clear invaded Iraq.xxii The combination of the pattern between the clustering of two 2003 events served as a signal of significant number of high-level meetings North Korean instability and its between the two nations followed by a potentially violent ramifications, causing period of rapid trade increases, this paper China to increase exchanges in counter. argues that foreign policy—using The second notable element in diplomatic exchanges as a proxy—did this chart is the takeoff in high-level indeed impact bilateral trade between the exchanges between China and North two nations. As was the case with Wen
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 25!
Jiabao’s 2009 Pyongyang trip, visits officials resulted in concrete decisions on between North Korean and Chinese the part of both nations to shore up trade.
Figure 3: Mineral Financial Modelxxvi
In the mineral policy financial can be drawn between mineral policy model, key events consist of major events and increases in trade. Although investments made by Chinese companies trade does increase in the years following in the North Korean mining industry as the first 2003 mineral event, the steady well as Chinese government policies stream of mineral investments and policy specifically relating to mineral directives does not provide conclusive development (for example, Jilin Province’s evidence toward any particular mineral 12th Five-year plan references the shock causing greater bilateral trade. promotion of North Korean natural Moreover, it would be dangerous to resources). Two points of comparison can extrapolate that the emergence of a more be made between this mineral model and concrete mineral policy in 2003 directly the foreign policy model. On the one led to the takeoff in Sino-DPRK trade hand, both similarly lack major events given that the 2004-2006 period saw a before 2003, corroborating the fact that decline in North Korean exports to China. this year served as a turning point in Sino- As a result, based upon the comparative DPRK relations. More importantly, models of North Korean trade and however, the mineral policy model lacks foreign and mineral policy events, it the clustering pattern exhibited in the appears as though Chinese foreign policy foreign policy model, and instead shows a makes a far more clear impact on relatively consistent series of events economic outcomes between China and between 2003 and 2012 (Figure 3). North Korea. Whereas in the foreign policy model clustering of diplomatic exchanges was clearly followed by rapid increases in DPRK exports to China, in the mineral policy model, no clear causal relationship
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 26!
II. CHINESE POLICY Peaceful Development. As Park states, DIRECTIVES China’s foreign policy enables it to secure both external stability so that it may This section will rely upon the concentrate on economic growth, and analysis of five major elements of Chinese develop relations with other major policy: central and provincial government countries for trade.xxx China’s two North 10th, 11th, and 12th Five-Year economic Korean policy interests of long-term Plans; the 2003 National Policy on denuclearization and regime stability can Mineral Resources; the 2007 Plan of be seen to fit in this broader 2011 white Revitalizing Northeast China; and the paper. Denuclearization works toward 2011 white paper entitled “China’s China’s goal of Harmonious World and Foreign Policy for Pursuing Peaceful regional cooperation, and DPRK regime Development.” These policies span the stability meets the priorities of new foreign, mineral, and economic realms, security thinking and regional and additionally, relate to actors at both cooperation. the national and local levels. This section Chinese mineral policy can be will seek to determine whether China’s illustrated with the 2003 “Policy on foreign policy or mineral policy is rooted Mineral Resources”, which emphasizes more strongly in economic policy, thereby broad, sustainable mineral development. being the primary influence on trade The central government notes that outcomes with North Korea. It will begin although China does have vast swaths of by separately outlining national foreign domestic natural resources, their and mineral policies, and then delving into development is hindered by poor natural which plays a larger role in economic conditions. Thus, while China primarily policy by way of an analysis of actors seeks development of its own mineral within China. resources, “it is an important government Beijing’s foreign policy goals are policy to […] make use of foreign markets most clearly presented in its 2011 white and foreign mineral resources”.xxxi What is paper, “China’s Foreign Policy for more, the 2003 policy states that foreign Pursuing Peaceful Development.” This direct investment in other countries’ white paper outlines five key elements of minerals “is of great significance for the China’s broad foreign policy at the common prosperity” and that national level: support for a Harmonious “prospecting for and exploitation of hard World; an independent foreign policy of rock mineral resources in other countries peace; new thinking on security based on has […] begun”.xxxii It is evident then that mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality, and Beijing’s mineral policy, as stated in 2003, coordination; international responsibility; is far more explicit toward its intentions and regional cooperation or good with the DPRK than its foreign policy. neighbor policy.xxvii Despite the fact that While its North Korean foreign policy can this paper was published in 2011, the be interpreted within the language used in policy elements it describes have been the 2011 white paper, the central active in China throughout the Hu Jintao government mineral policy is clear that period. With the exception of the shift China would be interested in mineral trade from “Peaceful Rise” to “Peaceful and investment in North Korea. Development”, they are not starkly It is next important to determine different from those under Jiang the extent to which these separate foreign Zemin.xxviii xxix Each of these foreign policy and mineral policies work into China’s goals serves China’s broader interest in economic policies, and to draw upon the
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 27! point of view of local actors. Three key Korea.xxxviii Thus, a clear trail can be seen pieces of economic policy were in place between a broader economic decision to during the relevant 2000-2012 period in reduce disparity in economic growth, and China: the 10th, 11th, and 12th Five-Year the mechanism for doing so in the Plans, in which the central government Northeast: reconstituting industrial and outlined the various economic goals of the mining production and moreover, nation, including GDP and production connections to North Korea. Further targets. The transition in policy between evidence toward this fact can be seen in the 10th and 11th Five-Year Plans in 2006 Jilin’s 2004 “Plan of Revitalization of Old is most notable. Since the institution of Industrial Bases”, where the province economic reforms by Deng Xiaoping in looked to increase economic cooperation 1978, Chinese Five-Year Plans and trade with North Korea. xxxix Its consistently emphasized economic growth provincial 12th Five-year Plan also seeks to rates as the primary target of the central increase economic cooperation with government.xxxiii Fan notes that economic North Korea, and emphasizes the policy through the Jiang Zemin era gave importance of the development of a port little recognition to growing income at Rajin, North Korea.xl inequality within China, particularly in its The third, overlapping alternative northeastern provinces. xxxiv This changed explanation is clearly supported through under Hu Jintao with the 11th Five-Year these policy directives, at both the Plan. The language of emphasis in the 11th national and local level. The national drive plan, Hu’s first, shifts from “getting rich to stabilize development is converted into first” to “common prosperity”. xxxv In targeted northeastern policy to increase addition, the 11th plan introduces the word industrial and mineral production. These “steady” in reference to economic growth, directives are then monetized at the local which emphasizes a shift toward a longer- level: as Jilin province illustrates, the term focus by the national national directive to increase provincial government.xxxvi The long-term economic development is interpreted as license to development emphasis was carried develop minerals and transportation with through into the 12th Five-Year Plan, North Korea in order to drive economic published in 2011 with references to growth. Connecting provincial “higher quality growth” and “inclusive development to North Korea, therefore, growth”.xxxvii serves two functions for local leaders: it Given the national goal of provides profit in the mineral and reducing income inequality evidenced in transport sectors, and more importantly, the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans, it is successful economic growth can serve as a important to look at policies specifically promotion mechanism to coveted central pertaining to the three poorer border government positions. provinces of Jilin, Liaoning, and In assessing whether these policy Heilongjiang. Such policies provide a lens directives are evidence toward the first or into how national level economic policy is second primary alternative explanations, implemented provincially. The 2007 one must distinguish between actors national-level “Plan of Revitalizing within China. Interpreting Chinese Northeast China” references hastening the foreign, mineral, and economic policy process of opening-up on a local scale, the directives at the national level does not “[uplifting of] basic and raw materials provide overwhelming evidence toward industry”, as well as transportation the first or second alternative explanation construction along the border with North when viewed in isolation. The language
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 28! contained in Chinese national foreign and his predecessor Jiang had been.xlii, xliii From mineral policies can certainly be the foreign policy perspective, several key interpreted in relation to North Korea, bodies have the ability to impact final but it is not explicit that either policy decisions made by the PBSC and the works directly into China’s economic leader of China. The most important of policy via the 11th and 12th Five-Year these institutions are Leading Small Plans, where northeastern development Groups (LSGs), the International appears the primary objective. On the Department underneath the party Central other hand, given the chain in which Committee, and to a lesser extent, the economic policy at the national level leads Ministries of Foreign Affairs and to connection with North Korea at the Commerce. While the Ministries certainly local level, first through targeted have involvement in foreign policy northeastern development plans and then making, senior ministers are typically out- provincial revitalization and Five-Year ranked by other individuals involved in plans, it is clear that local actors have the decision process. xliv As such, the interpreted national directives as license to Ministries appear to have more of an engage in mineral and transportation implementation role in Chinese policy as a development with North Korea. Simply body of the State and not the superior viewing the local policy directives in Party. Similarly, although the Chinese isolation, it appears as though provincial military also retains some influence over mineral interest in North Korea is the foreign policy, its role has diminished due dominant factor in economic engagement. to its increasing professionalization.xlv In order to determine, though, whether Given the importance of rank in national economic policy toward North Chinese party politics and the makeup of Korea results primarily from foreign or these bodies, it appears as though the mineral policy, one must look toward the LSGs, especially the Foreign Affairs Work balance of power within Chinese policy Leading Small Group and the National decision-making. That is, how are foreign Security Work Leading Small Group, exert and mineral policies determined in China? the greatest influence over the PBSC’s Are the individuals vested with ultimate decisions. While the membership rosters decision-making power the same for both of these two LSGs are unknown, China policies? scholars assert the likelihood that their Constitutionally, the National memberships overlap greatly if not People’s Congress (NPC) retains all law- entirely.xlvi Hu (previously Jiang and now making authority within China, but in Xi Jinping) served as head of both groups reality, the Chinese Communist Party with Xi Jinping as his deputy (likely now (CPC) and the Politburo and Politburo Li Kequiang) and was supported by other Standing Committee (PBSC) at its head members including individuals in the are the true decision-makers, while the Politburo and various ministries (such as NPC serves as a rubber stamp.xli Under Liang Guanglie, the Minister of Defense, Hu Jintao (in charge during the primary and Dai Bingguo, a State Councilor and period of interest in this paper), the PBSC senior diplomat).xlvii was comprised of nine members. While After the LSGs, the International Hu, as Party General Secretary, President, Department appears to be the next most and Chair of the Military Commission, significant foreign policy body, especially had final decision-making authority in in North Korea relations. Traditionally, China, he appeared to be more interested the International Department under the in governing by consensus than perhaps party’s Central Committee served as the
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 29! key diplomatic body in relations with the Chinese party and government communist governments. From 1997- structure, it is evident that foreign policy 2003, the director of the International is far more powerful. The LSGs under the Department was Dai Bingguo PBSC and the International Department (subsequently a State Councilor and LSG under the Central Committee are higher member), who was replaced by Wang ranking than the NDRC and MLR as Jiarui in 2003. xlviii Schambaugh describes party rather than state bodies, and include that the International Department has China’s most senior officials. Thus, seven key functions in diplomatic regardless of the extent to which China’s exchanges, three of which are especially central leaders or other influential policy relevant to North Korea. The Department actors are interested in incorporating is responsible for sending party leaders mineral policy into economic policy, abroad (such as Hu’s 2005 visit to North simply given the rank-order of the Korea), hosting foreign leaders (including decision-making structure, foreign policy all of Kim Jong-Il’s visits to China from necessarily dominates mineral policy at the 2000-06), and publicizing China’s policies highest levels of the national government. overseas.xlix As such, although China’s national From the mineral policy economic policy does not explicitly perspective, two bodies appear to be reference North Korea, the implicit responsible for the most important authorization that China’s Peaceful decisions: the National Development and Development and Northeastern Reform Commission (NDRC) and the development policies provide to local- Ministry of Land and Resources (MLR). level actors consequently takes a greater Mineral policy is not covered by an LSG foreign rather than mineral policy flavor. under the PBSC, nor does mineral policy This analysis of Chinese policy directives feature prominently in a PBSC member’s suggests that at the local level, trade policy portfolio. l , li Within the Chinese decisions with North Korea are impacted political structure, both the NDRC and more by mineral policy given the manner the MLR fall under the State Council, and in which local actors monetize national so are outranked by LSGs as bodies of the directives, while at the national level, PBSC. Furthermore, it is important to foreign policy plays a more dominant role. note that between the NDRC and the Both alternative explanations are MLR, the NDRC is the more powerful of supported by policies at different levels of the two, and is commonly considered the the Chinese government. most powerful organ under the State Council.lii This might suggest that because III. SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS the NDRC’s policy portfolio covers broader economic themes while the It appears thus far as though the foreign MLR’s policies specifically relate to policy alternative explanation has more minerals, mineral policy in general is support given that both the financial watered down in China to the extent that models and national policy directives fall it must fit within the NDRC’s broader in its favor, while only local policy goals for the economy. directives favor the mineral alternative What, then, are the implications of explanation. However, there are a few the structure of Chinese foreign and pieces of supplementary evidence that do mineral policy decision-making bodies on suggest targeted Chinese interest in North North Korean trade policy? Given the Korean mineral reserves. This section will arrangement of policy portfolios within proceed by analyzing supplementary
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 30! evidence from the perspective of the south by sea to major demand centers mineral alternative hypothesis. It will such as Guangzhou. lvi Even though the consider evidence as it relates to Chinese rail-sea transport method does reduce interest in North Korean minerals to serve costs as compared to the road-rail skyrocketing domestic demand, Chinese method, importing coal is still often profit-seeking motives, and will conclude cheaper. Richard Morse and Gange He by examining Chinese mineral stockpiling. believe that this indeed became the case in 2009 when China became a coal importer A. COVERING DOMESTIC SUPPLY for the first time. lvii In the same year, SHORTAGES North Korean coal production rose by 440,000 tons, and mineral fuel exports to While China is the world’s largest China rose 25.2 percent over 2008 (and producer of many minerals, it continues to 53.8 percent between 2009 and 2010).lviii, lix face critical shortages due to its rapid Skeptics might suggest that China couldn’t population and economic growth rates. A possibly satisfy its domestic demand by study of China’s coal industry is especially increasing mineral trade with a small illustrative in this respect. China is the producer like North Korea. Yet, in 2009, world’s largest coal producer and has the North Korea was China’s second largest world’s third largest coal reserves, yet it supplier of anthracite coal.lx This evidence, became a net importer of coal in 2009.liii then points toward the fact that China As previously mentioned, Chinese policy indeed believes it must begin to source directives at both the national and coal imports, especially after seeing new provincial level have sought not only to pricing realities in 2009, and that North increase domestic mineral production, but Korea was a viable option to compensate also to turn to international imports to for domestic shortages. The subsequent compensate. The national government has section’s discussion of North Korean coal sought to curb coal exports since 2002, and iron ore export prices corroborate the has altered tax structures in 2006 and 2007 attractiveness of North Korea as a mineral to encourage coal imports, and then has supplier. abolished coal import tariffs and export tax breaks.liv Why, if China is capable of B. PROFIT SEEKING producing sufficient coal domestically to meet demand, has the country sought coal The number of foreign imports? In all likelihood, it is actually investments in North Korea is difficult to easier and cheaper for China to import say, based on the hazardous business coal than to rely upon domestic environment there. On the low end of the production, simply due to the spectrum, the Nautilus Institute estimates organization of China’s coal industry. 25 foreign investments into North Korean China’s domestic coal is largely mining projects, 20 of which are Chinese sourced from Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, (implied to be since 2001).lxi By contrast, and Shanxi provinces in northwestern Thompson found 138 total Chinese joint China, yet most of China’s coal demand ventures in North Korea between 1997 comes from the southeast. lv Given the and 2010, 56 of which were in extractive high expense of transporting coal from industries. lxii Nevertheless, China the northwest directly to the southeast by represents the largest foreign interest in road or rail, instead the domestic coal North Korean mining to-date. While typically travels due east by rail to major Thompson argues that Chinese joint ports such as Qinhuangdao and then ventures in North Korea are a result of
Princeton Journal of East Asian Studies! 31! broader foreign policies of regional Chinese FDI in North Korea is positively stability and denuclearization, this paper correlated with rising commodity prices argues that FDI in North Korean minerals through 2007. lxiv In this respect, two provides evidence toward the mineral potential goals are possible: first, China policy alternative explanation from a might have sought to develop and import profit-seeking perspective. The bulk of North Korean minerals at below-market Chinese FDI in North Korea comes from prices to then export internationally at smaller firms located within Liaoning and profit. Alternatively, the Chinese might Jilin provinces (34 percent and 29 percent have imported cheaper North Korean of Chinese FDI in North Korea, minerals for domestic consumption. The respectively). lxiii At most, this points first argument is likely not the case, at toward the third alternative explanation— least on large scale nationally. North provincial firms’ decisions to monetize Korea’s largest exports to China are coal national directives to increase provincial and iron ore. By plotting a chart of North economic development. Korean mineral fuel exports to China More likely, the preponderance of (including coal) along with China’s world FDI by small firms in Jilin and Liaoning coal exports, the lack of relationship suggests an independent interest in profit between the two is quite clear. seeking. Thompson goes on to state that
Figure 4lxv DPRK%Mineral%Fuel%Exports%to%China,%China's%