HB-No51-Vojvodina's Statute

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HB-No51-Vojvodina's Statute HELSINKIBulletin Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Rige od Fere str. # 20 , 11000 Belgrade, Serbia tel./fax +381 11 30 32 408; e-mail: [email protected] ; www.helsinki.org.rs No 51 ● December 2009 Vojvodina’s Statute: First Major Step towards Modernization And Decentralization Adoption of Vojvodina’s Statute is a Science /SANU/, along with some uni- major event indicative of an irrevoca- versity circles. They will be seizing every ble trend. Though obstructed and opportunity that has anything to do with postponed so many times, the adop- Vojvodina to stand in the way of the ad- tion of the Statute is a step towards a vocates of autonomy. new frame within which the province will be making better use of its own Battle for Statute resources and the possibilities EU provides, particularly for regional de- The Assembly of Vojvodina declared the velopment. new Statute on November 19, 2009, At the same time, the adoption whereas the republican parliament is a victory of the political current for adopted the Law on Transfer of Authori- a decentralized and modern Serbia. It ties to Vojvodina and gave a green light will surely encourage other regions as to the Statute on November 30, 2009. well to seek decentralization and Out of 163 MPs attending the parliamen- loosen Belgrade’s grip. tary session, 138 gave their vote to the The newly adopted Statute fits Law and 137 for the Statute. Nikolic’s into the legal frame of the 2006 Con- “progressists” did not participate in the stitution. However, Vojvodina will vote. hardly be in the position to fully effec- Though the media had been se- tuate the powers transferred to it un- verely campaigning against the Statute, der the Statute unless it controls all of its very adoption found little echo in the its resources. Given that the Law on public. The months-long campaign Transfer of Authorities fails to define abounding in dirty tricks, humiliation, some crucial questions such as prop- unprincipled stands and incompetence, 1 erty and finances the actual imple- as Provincial Secretary for Administra- mentation of the powers the province tion, Regulations and National Minorities has been invested with remains to be Tamas Korhec labeled it, could not have seen. but fastened on people’s mind. Besides, The conservative bloc with Vo- neither autonomists nor their opponents jislav Kostunica at helm sees the are satisfied with the adopted provisions Statute as a separatist threat. Apart – the former because they got less than from Kostunica’s Democratic Party of they expected and the latter because Serbia /DSS/ the loudest opponents they take that the former got more than of the Statute are the Serb Progressive they would be ready to give them. Party /SNS/, the Serb Radical Party /SRS/, the Serb Orthodox Church and the Serb Academy of Arts and 1 Dnevnik , December 5, 2009. 1 Ever since the provincial parlia- tists. All it /Vojvodina/ has to do is to ment adopted it (October 2008) the take over the already developed seces- Statute has been strongly denied and sionist idea and put in action the ac- politically criminalized. Sandor Egersi, quired media, institutional and finances president of the provincial parliament, resources – and we are getting yet an- tried hard to counteract the negative other state on Serbia’s soil,” says An- effects of the propaganda against the tonic. 4 Statute by touring towns in Serbia Vojislav Kostunica, DSS leader, and presenting its contents. All his commented the draft statute and the efforts were in vain since main subsequent law as Serbia’s “return to the sources of resistance were in Belgrade status of a paralyzed state.” “That’s a rather than in provinces. 2 step towards federalization or disman- The official Belgrade’s attitude tlement of Serbia by the model of the towards suggestions and initiatives 1974 Constitution,” said Kostunica. 5 Ac- coming from Vojvodina, and towards cording to him, the actual government the Statute itself, mirror its stance bestows on Vojvodina elements of state- about a more important issue – decen- hood and turns it into a state within a tralization of Serbia. According to state. 6 economist Vladimir Gligorov, Bel- Miroslav Alimpic, professor at the grade’s attitude towards decentraliza- Novi Sad University, shares his view. tion actually reveals its aspirations for “The incumbent government prepares powers it want to keep for itself. the terrain for Vojvodina’s secession. Au- “There is a strong, centralistic ten- tonomists or their political heirs have dency in Serbia – simply because cen- evolved considerably. They no longer tralism invests the central govern- demand just political, economic and cul- ment, the President, the administra- tural autonomy but also total separation tion, the police, the army and the from Serbia and establishment of a re- Church with more power…There is public with all characteristics and pre- also a strong resistance to any trans- rogatives of an independent state,” says fer of authority to lower levels of gov- Alimpic. 7 What Serbia needs, he stresses, ernance, particularly if such transfers are law and order, peace, work, disci- are lasting and unchangeable,” says pline and political stability – and the only Gligorov. 3 way to reach these goals without unnec- essary delay is to withdraw everything Opposition by conservative bloc dealing with Vojvodina from procedure. All DSS officials agreed that “unconstitu- Parts of Serbia’s intellectual elites, tional draft statute should be withdrawn rightist parties, Church, various from parliamentary procedure and re- quasi-patriotic organizations and the turned to the provincial assembly, which so-called analysts teamed up to op- must adjust it to the Constitution.” 8 pose “Vojvodina laws,” the Statute in Another course of action “Vo- the first place. The fact that both Kos- jvodina’s separatists” are taking to attain ovo and Montenegro declared inde- their goal, say their critics, is establish- pendence before the Statute came un- ment of “crypto-state institutions” such der discussion only fueled their resis- as Vojvodina’s Academy of Arts and Sci- tance. “A separatist ideology is already ences /VANU/. Slobodan Antonic indi- rooted in Vojvodina,” claims political cates that the statutory provisions on analyst Slobodan Antonic and warns VANU are significant symbolically and that adoption of a “crypto-federalist says, “Revival of VANU is a symbolic Statute” and “institutional corpus prelude to creation of a new state and a separatum” would destroy the coun- new nation.” For a small country such as try’s constitutional whole. “Hence, Vo- Serbia, “regional academies of sciences jvodina will become a semi-state with sufficient resources of its own ena- bling its elite to rerun the scenario of 4 www.nspm.rs . Slovenian and Montenegrin separa- 5 Večernje novosti , 12. novembar 2009. 6 Isto. 7 Miroslav Alimpic, „Serbia and Vojvodina: People 2 Dnevnik , 28. novembar 2009. Must Know the Truth,“ at www.nemasale.rs . 3 Dnevnik , 2. septembar 2009. 8 Dnevnik , October 12, 2009. 2 are senseless and cannot be either ated bureaucratic monster may easily scientifically or functionally justified.” 9 transform into a quasi-nation and a Synod of the Serb Orthodox quasi-state,” say the authors of the letter Church also expressed its concern and, hence, appeal to the President of over the establishment of VANU. “Un- the Republic and MPs to deny “support constitutional establishment of the so- to this deadly concept for Serbia’s decen- called Vojvodina’s Academy of Arts tralization.” 10 and Sciences is supposed to endow Over the parliamentary debate the Vojvodina Serbs with a specific na- SNS leader, Tomislav Nikolic, asked, tional identity,” says Synod in a re- “How far you think you can go with the lease. “The Synod is much concerned so-called autonomy without anyone call- over sovereignty and territorial integ- ing you to account for making a state rity of the state of Serbia which were within a state? And how come that only first seriously undermined – and tem- Vojvodina is committed to European val- porarily, we hope – by seizure and oc- ues? What do you think the rest of us cupation of Kosovo and Metohija , and are? Savages?” 11 The Vojvodina Statute then by the attempt to turn the has a quasi-constitutional structure be- Autonomous Province of Vojvodina cause it has a preamble referring to citi- into a new state within a state,” zens of Vojvodina, which our Constitu- quotes the release. “As this draft stat- tion does not recognize, and because it ute opens the door to further decom- defines a territory, emblems, a capital, position and destruction of the already property…Since over one hundred com- shrunk and crippled Serbian state, we petences are transferred from Serbia to appeal to the President of the Repub- Vojvodina, we are going to get Serbia lic, the Premier and the Parliament to composed of two parts, politically and present this communication and re- administratively – Serbia proper as it was quest of ours to the parliamentary at the time of Brioni Yugoslavia and Vo- session discussing the issue, and jvodina,” said DSS Vice-president Slobo- hope MPs would consider our argu- dan Samardzic. 12 As for Dragan To- mentation with due attention and vote dorovic, SRS vice-president, adoption of against such an obviously unconstitu- the Statute will be among the govern- tional act,” concludes the release. ment’s “historically most harmful mo- tions,” even “more harmful that occupa- Final assaults at Statute tion of Kosovo.” “While Kosovo was snatched away from us, Vojvodina will be Ideological duo of the New Serbian given away with our blessing. By adopt- Thought magazine, Slobodan Antonic ing the Statute Serbia gives up Vojvodina and Djordje Vukadinovic, publicized and paves the way for a new federal an open letter to the President and unit,” he said.
Recommended publications
  • Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities
    Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragana Mašović
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Philosophy and Sociology Vol. 2, No 8, 2001, pp. 545 - 555 THE ROMANIES IN SERBIAN (DAILY) PRESS UDC 316.334.52:070(=914.99) Dragana Mašović Faculty of Philosophy, Niš Abstract. The paper deals with the presence of Romanies' concerns in Serbian daily press. More precisely, it tries to confirm the assumption that not enough space is devoted to the issue as evident in a small-scale analysis done on seven daily papers during the sample period of a week. The results show that not only mere absence of Romanies' issues is the key problem. Even more important are the ways in which the editorial startegy and the language used in the published articles turn out to be (when unbiased and non-trivial) indirect, allusive and "imbued with promises and optimism" so far as the presumed difficulties and problems of the Romanies are concerned. Thus they seem to avoid facing the reality as it is. Key Words: Romanies, Serbian daily press INTRODUCTION In Mary Woolstonecraft's Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1972) there is an urgent imperative mentioned that can also be applied to the issue of Romanies presence in our press. Namely, she suggested that "in the present state of society it appears necessary to go back to first principles in search of the most simple truths, and to dispute with some prevailing prejudice every inch of ground." More precisely, in the case of the Romanies' presence in the press the question to be asked is what would be the "first principles" that Woolstonecraft refers to? No doubt that in this context they refer to what has always been considered the very basis of every democratic, open-minded and tolerant society, that is, the true equality of all the citizens as reflected in every aspect of the society that proclaims itself to be multi-cultural.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Watch Serbia1 Print Media Monitoring
    Media Watch Serbia1 Print Media Monitoring METHODOLOGY The analysis of the daily press from the viewpoint of the observance of generally accepted ethical norms is based on a structural quality analysis of the contents of selected newspaper articles. The monitoring includes eight dailies: Politika, Danas, Vecernje novosti, Blic, Glas javnosti, Kurir, Balkan and Internacional. Four weeklies are also the subject of the analysis: Vreme, NIN, Evropa and Nedeljni Telegraf. The basic research question requiring a reply is the following: What are the most frequent forms of the violation of the generally accepted ethical norms and standards in the Serbian press? The previously determined and defined categories of professional reporting are used as the unit of the analysis in the analysis of ethical structure of reporting. The texts do not identify all the categories but the dominant ones only, three being the maximum. The results of the analysis do not refer to the space they take or the frequency of their appearances but stress the ethical norms mostly violated and those which represent the most obvious abuse of public writing by the journalists. The study will not only point out typical or representative cases of non-ethical reporting but positive examples as well whereas individual non- standard cases of the violation of the professional ethics will be underlined in particular. Finally, at the end of each monitoring period, a detailed quality study of selected articles will provide a deep analysis of the monitored topics and cases. 1 The Media Watch Serbia Cultural Education and Development Project for Increasing Ethical and Legal Standards in Serbian Journalism is financed and supported by UNESCO.
    [Show full text]
  • FOM Director
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe The Representative on Freedom of the Media Freimut Duve Report to the Permanent Council Vienna, 30 March 2000 Madame Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen, In my first quarterly report to the Permanent Council this year, I will cover our main activities since December 1999. And as last year, at the end of March, I would like to present to you again our Yearbook that covers our main themes and activities since February 1999. But first of all, two remarks on current issues: I am concerned about developments in Kyrgyzstan last week. One journalist of Res Publika newspaper was arrested for some days after covering a peaceful demonstration in Bishkek. Vash Advocat has seized publication as the tax inspection authorities have frozen its accounts. The state-owned distribution network has refused to distribute three newspapers. These developments are disturbing in the election context as all papers in question were involved in election coverage. On Belarus: More than 30 journalists, both Belarusian and international were arrested during the opposition-staged demonstration in Minsk on 25 March. The police did not express the reason for detention. Some of the journalists have been illegally searched, some lost their film and other equipment, and none were permitted to inform relatives or employers about their detention. This type of action is totally unacceptable in an OSCE participating State and must be condemned in the strongest terms. It endangers, once more, the political and social dialogue in Belarus about elections in the course of this year. I have asked the Foreign Minister to ensure that the journalists remaining in custody should be immediately released.
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIA Jovanka Matić and Dubravka Valić Nedeljković
    SERBIA Jovanka Matić and Dubravka Valić Nedeljković porocilo.indb 327 20.5.2014 9:04:47 INTRODUCTION Serbia’s transition to democratic governance started in 2000. Reconstruction of the media system – aimed at developing free, independent and pluralistic media – was an important part of reform processes. After 13 years of democratisation eff orts, no one can argue that a new media system has not been put in place. Th e system is pluralistic; the media are predominantly in private ownership; the legal framework includes European democratic standards; broadcasting is regulated by bodies separated from executive state power; public service broadcasters have evolved from the former state-run radio and tel- evision company which acted as a pillar of the fallen autocratic regime. However, there is no public consensus that the changes have produced more positive than negative results. Th e media sector is liberalized but this has not brought a better-in- formed public. Media freedom has been expanded but it has endangered the concept of socially responsible journalism. Among about 1200 media outlets many have neither po- litical nor economic independence. Th e only industrial segments on the rise are the enter- tainment press and cable channels featuring reality shows and entertainment. Th e level of professionalism and reputation of journalists have been drastically reduced. Th e current media system suff ers from many weaknesses. Media legislation is incom- plete, inconsistent and outdated. Privatisation of state-owned media, stipulated as mandato- ry 10 years ago, is uncompleted. Th e media market is very poorly regulated resulting in dras- tically unequal conditions for state-owned and private media.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia by Misha Savic
    Serbia by Misha Savic Capital: Belgrade Population: 7.2 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,430 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Independent Media 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 National Democratic Governance 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Local Democratic Governance 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Corruption 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.75 3.71 3.68 3.79 3.79 3.71 3.64 3.64 3.64 3.64 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP RS NARS and Indepen
    The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia Serbia AND INDEPENDENT BODIES SERBIA THE REPUBLIC OF OF ASSEMBLY NATIONAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES 253 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES Materials from the Conference ”National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia and Independent Bodies” Belgrade, 26-27 November 2009 and an Overview of the Examples of International Practice Olivera PURIĆ UNDP Deputy Resident Representative a.i. Edited by Boris ČAMERNIK, Jelena MANIĆ and Biljana LEDENIČAN The following have participated: Velibor POPOVIĆ, Maja ŠTERNIĆ, Jelena MACURA MARINKOVIĆ Translated by: Novica PETROVIĆ Isidora VLASAK English text revised by: Charles ROBERTSON Design and layout Branislav STANKOVIĆ Copy editing Jasmina SELMANOVIĆ Printing Stylos, Novi Sad Number of copies 150 in English language and 350 in Serbian language For the publisher United Nations Development Programme, Country Office Serbia Internacionalnih brigada 69, 11000 Beograd, +381 11 2040400, www.undp.org.rs ISBN – 978-86-7728-125-0 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. Acknowledgement We would like to thank all those whose hard work has made this publication possible. We are particularly grateful for the guidance and support of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, above all from the Cabinet of the Speaker and the Secretariat. A special debt of gratitude is owed to the representatives of the independent regulatory bodies; the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the State Audit Institution, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia and the Anti-corruption Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Councils of National Minorities in Serbia
    The national councils of national minorities in Serbia Katinka Beretka* and István Gergő Székely** January 2016 Recommended citation: Beretka Katinka and Székely István Gergő, “The national councils of national minorities in the Republic of Serbia”, Online Compendium Autonomy Arrangements in the World, January 2016, at www.world-autonomies.info. © 2016 Autonomy Arrangements in the World Content 1. Essential Facts and Figures 2. Autonomy in the Context of the State Structure 3. Establishment and Implementation of Autonomy 4. Legal Basis of Autonomy 5. Autonomous Institutions 6. Autonomous Powers 7. Financial Arrangements 8. Intergovernmental Relations 9. Inter-group Relations within the Autonomous Entity (not applicable) 10. Membership, “Quasi-citizenship” and Special Rights 11. General Assessment and Outlook Bibliography 2016 © Autonomy Arrangements in the World Project 1. Essential Facts and Figures 1 Serbia is located in the center of the Balkans, being an everyday subject of world news from the beginning of the 1990s, often due to ethnicity-related issues, ranging from civil war and secession to autonomy arrangements meant to accommodate ethnocultural diversity. Although according to the 2011 census almost 20% of the total population of the state (without Kosovo) belong to a minority group (see Table 1), in Serbia there are no officially recognized or unrecognized minorities. There is neither an exact enumeration of minority groups, nor clear principles to be followed about how a minority should be recognized. While the absence of precise regulations may be regarded as problematic, the approach of Serbia to the minority question can also be interpreted as being rather liberal, which may have resulted from the intention to protect ethnic Serb refugees who have become minorities abroad, including in the former Yugoslav member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2009
    IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSITIONAL LAWS IN SERBIA 2009 1 Youth Initiative for Human Rights Human Rights Program 31 March 2010 For Publisher Maja Stojanovic Editor Dragan Popovic Authors Maja Micic Dusan Lopusina Gazmend Selmani Sladjana Djurdjevic Design/Prepress Nikola Milenkovic Human Rights Program and this report were supported by Civil Rights Defenders We are grateful to all partners for their support Printing Zlatna knjiga, Kragujevac Copies: 300 ISBN 978-86-85381-21-8 Copyright© Youth Initiative for Human Rights www.yihr.org 2 Contents INTRODUCTION 5 EValUATION OF The Degree OF RUle OF Law in Serbia 7 Law Against Discrimination 8 Introduction / History 8 Key events in 2009 9 Analisys OF The Law AgainsT DiscriminaTION 13 Conclusions / Recommendations 19 HATE Speech 21 Hate Speech in the Law on Public Information 21 Hate Speech in the Law Against Discrimination 22 Hate Speech in International Documents 22 Key Events in 2009 23 Hate Speesh Lawsuits 23 Lawsuit against the “Nova srpska politicka misao“ magazine 25 Conclusions / Recommendations 27 Law ON CHUrches and ReligiOUS COmmUniTies 29 Introduction / History 29 Key Events in 2009 32 Registration of Religious Communities 32 Incidents Based on Religion 40 Relations Between Minority Religious Communities and State Organs 42 Conclusions 44 Recommendations 45 RepORT ON The STATE OF HUman RighTS OF Members OF The Albanian NATIOnal COmmUniTY in The PreseVO and BUJanOVac MUnicipaliTies 47 Introduction 47 Key Events in 2009 49 Political and Security Situation 49 Freedom of Expressing Nationality
    [Show full text]
  • Bojan Aleksov
    Bojan Aleksov Senior Lecturer in Modern Southeast European History SSEES, University College London Gower Street WC1E 6BT Tel: +44 20 7679 8868 Fax: +44 20 7679 8777 Email: [email protected] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ssees/people/a-z/bojan-aleksov Education PhD in Comparative History of Central, Southern and Eastern Europe at the Central European University, Budapest (2005), summa cum laude Thesis Title: “Religious Dissent in the Age of Modernization and Nationalism: Nazarenes in Hungary and Serbia 1850-1914” 2000-2001 - Visiting Student - Osteuropa Institut, Freie Universität Berlin MA in Central European History at the Central European University, Budapest (1999) Thesis Title: “The Dynamics of Extinction: The Nazarene Religious Community in Yugoslavia after 1945” B. A. in History, University of Belgrade, Serbia (1998) 2007 - Certificate in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (CLTHE) 1995 - Summer School at L’Institut de Science Politique in Rennes, France Posts, fellowships and research projects 2017 January to June – The Fritz Thyssen Senior Fellowship 2015 - 2018 The Leverhulme Trust - International Network Grant Project Title: A Transnational Approach to Resistance in Europe, 1936-48 Co-PI with Professor Robert Gildea, Oxford University (total funding: £90,886) 2014- 2016 – History Programme Coordinator UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES) 2013- present – Director of the UCL Centre for South-East European Studies 2012 – Visiting Fellow at the Südost-Institut and the Osteuropa-Institut in Regensburg 2011 – PostYugoslav
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Russian-Serbian Relations
    1 Contemporary Russian-Serbian Relations: Interviews with Youth from Political Parties in Belgrade and Vojvodina By Chloe Kay Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Colorado Boulder Defended March 31, 2014 Primary Advisor Rimgaila Salys, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Committee Members Tatiana Mikhailova, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Laura Osterman, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Laurel Rodd, Dept. of Asian Languages and Civilizations 2 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Historical Relations between Serbia and Russia………………………………………….7 Relations in the Middle Ages to 2008……………………………………………..7 Political Relations 2008-today………………………………………………………..11 Cultural Ties……………………………………………………………………………………13 Energy and Economics……………………………………………………………………14 Serbia in between East and West……………………………………………………15 The Opinions of Two Experts………………………………………………………………………17 Data Collection and Results………………………….….………………………………………….23 The history of Russian and Serbian Relations………………………….……….23 Russia as an International Actor in the World and the in Balkans…..25 Russia and Serbia: 200 million………………………………………………………...28 South Stream Pipeline: A gift or a scam?.………………………………………..30 Serbia: Caught in the Middle?………………………………………………………….31 Vladimir Putin and the Kosovo Question………………………………………….34 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………………35
    [Show full text]