Utopian Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Utopian Communities C HAPTER T WO U TOPIAN C OMMUNITIES R ELIGION, DEMOCRACY, AND S OCIALISM THE FIRST HALF-CENTURY OF THE LIFE of the new nation witnessed an extraordinary development of hopeful experiments and ideas. Idealists like Thomas Owen founded utopian socialist communities while religious enthusi- asts like Mother Ann Lee came to the United States seeking a place to start ex- periments like her Shaker communities. The combination of space that allowed people to develop their own communities relatively undisturbed and a philosophy that emphasized liberty, even the liberty to be eccentric, made the United States fertile ground for many radical experiments. Throughout the nineteenth century, various communitarian experiments were tried. Some were very short lived while others lasted for several generations, and a few continued into the twenty-first century. While there was a brief upsurge of in- terest in these early communal experiments by the participants in latter-day communes of the 1960s and 1970s, for the most part this story is a forgotten chapter in the nation’s history.1 M OTHER A NN L EE AND THE S HAKERS Shakers may be one of the most romanticized of American religious communi- tarian movements, although at times it is hard to know the focus of the roman- ticism. Today the communitarian impulse is not the only thing that Shakers are known for. Indeed, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is probably far from the top of the list. Mildred Barker, leader of the Shaker Community at J. W. Fraser, A History of Hope © James W. Fraser 2004 28 A HISTORY OF HOPE Sabbath Day Lake, Maine, who died in 1990, reflected, “I almost expect to be remembered as a chair or a table.”2 While Shaker furniture has grown in popu- larity, the kind of beloved community created by the Shakers that produced both the physical beauty of their furniture and the spiritual beauty of their wor- ship and community life recedes farther and farther from view. The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, called Shakers, dates back to the spiritual ferment that took place in France in the century before the French Revolution. A group of spiritualists attacked the Catholic Church as a false religion. Like other Protestants of the time, they called for reformation. And like other Protestants in France, they were not welcomed by the authorities. Some were silenced, others fled to England where they linked up with some dissident Quakers, especially in the emerging industrial center of Manchester.3 The Shakers—sometimes called the Shaking Quakers in the early days because of the enthusiasm and ecstasy in their worship—were one of the prod- ucts of this merger of reform-minded French spiritualists and English Quak- ers. From these Shaking Quakers Ann Lee—known among the Shakers as Mother Ann Lee—gathered a small group of supporters in England, immi- grated with them to the United States, and founded the first Shaker communi- ties here. As with many charismatic religious leaders and founders, much of Lee’s life and early teaching remains a mystery. She was born in Manchester, En- gland, in 1736 and was influenced by “inspirationists” from France and the English Quakers. She was married and had four children all of whom died in infancy. By her mid-thirties her spiritualism had led her and her fellow believ- ers to disrupt the worship services of the Established Church of England, which she saw as a dead ritual that diverted people from true spirituality. As a result she was arrested several times for disrupting the worship of other de- nominations.4 In 1770, while in jail on these charges, she had a powerful mys- tical experience. It convinced her of two things: that she was receiving a very special revelation from God that she was to share and that made her a special prophetic leader; and that human sexuality was the key to all sin—from Adam and Eve to the present—and celibacy was the only way to live a godly life. (Psychologists have had a field day wondering if the loss of four infants had played a role in her new rejection of sex, but there is really no way to know.) Lee was jailed several more times in England because of her continued preaching and practice of her beliefs. Indeed, she did much more than just preach. Like many a prophetic voice, she condemned the established churches to their faces, entering worship where, as one report noted, she “willfully and contemptuously in the time of divine service, disturb[ed] the UTOPIAN COMMUNITIES 29 congregation then assembled at morning prayer.” For that particular offense she was jailed for two days.5 Lee came to America in 1774 and eventually inspired the creation of celi- bate colonies that shared the pacifism and communitarianism of which she spoke. Ann Lee’s pacifism led to her being jailed by New York in 1780 on charges of undermining the American Revolution. In the first years after their arrival, the small Shaker community was content to live their own lives and did not seem much interested in seeking converts. However, after her release from jail in December 1780, Lee and two of her followers crisscrossed New York and New England founding “families” of Shakers. This famous missionary journey, which lasted from May 1781 to September 1783, established Lee’s mythic leadership. She suffered abuse from the unconvinced in many towns, but she also made many converts to her own version of the Christian faith. Lee died the following year, in September 1784, but the authority of her teachings was well established by that time.6 As Stephen Stein has noted in his carefully researched study of the Shakers, it is hard to know exactly what Lee did teach. One source that Stein uses is a 1780 publication from Valentine Rathbun, a Baptist minister who was deeply hostile to the Shakers. According to Rathbun, who viewed the movement as a “new scheme . the spirit of witchcraft,” Shakers had several key characteris- tics. They believed that marriage was sinful, they viewed Ann Lee as “the mother,” and some seemed to believe that she had “the fullness of the God Head” and was “the queen of heaven, Christ’s wife.” Many of the earliest Shak- ers also shared their meals and lodging and were clearly an intimate, although celibate, community. Perhaps most interesting, their worship was ecstatic. “Their actions in worship is according to the dictates of the spirit that governs them,” Rathbun reported. Shaker worship did not involve the traditional prayer or preaching. Instead their worship reflected their understanding of the new “spiritual dispensation,” including, as Stein notes, “shaking and singing, hopping and turning . and running, groaning and laughing. The believers viewed all these actions as manifestations of divine power and union with God.”7 That one of the Shakers’ harshest critics should describe their early lives in ways so similar to the actual practice of their later communities leads one to conclude that these characteristics were all established quite early in Shaker life. While Lee and her closest followers had lived together in a small com- munity just outside of Albany, New York, at the time of her death Shakers were scattered in many homes and villages across New England. Almost im- mediately after her death in 1784, however, Shakers began the process of sell- ing their homes and moving into a small number of tightly organized Shaker communities. In part this was a response to the hostility of neighbors who 30 A HISTORY OF HOPE took a dim view of their approach to marriage, their unique form of worship, and their harsh critique of established churches. Lee’s successors urged the Shakers to share all of their possessions and “have all things in common,” as had the earliest Christian communities. The core of the first Shaker commu- nity in New Lebanon, New York, was established when they built their first meeting house in 1785. Soon thereafter, a lively Shaker village sprung up around it.8 The Shaker community at New Lebanon thrived, as did the whole move- ment, and within a decade after Lee’s death there were ten communities with over 2,000 members. The revivals of the early nineteenth century added to the Shakers’ membership and they became one of the largest and most successful of the nineteenth-century communitarian movements. Early in the nineteenth century, the Shaker Community began the diffi- cult process of writing their own history and defining their basic beliefs. At its core, Shakerism is a faith based on ecstatic worship and ordered community life, with both open to the continued leading of the Holy Spirit. As a result, Shakers have always been distrustful of written statements of their theological beliefs. Nevertheless, the growth of the Shaker community, the geographical dispersion of their communities, and the hostility of their neighbors led Shak- ers to feel the need to clarify some of their most basic beliefs. In 1814 members of the church family signed an amended covenant de- signed not only to clarify some of their beliefs but also to assure continuity in the leadership, as the generations after Lee sought a clear basis for their own authority. After some initial reluctance because of their fears of being misun- derstood by others, they publicly asserted that “our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ did make his second appearance, by his Spirit, first in Ann Lee, whom we acknowledge to be the first Mother of all souls in the work of regeneration, and the first spiritual head of the Church of Christ then in the body.” They then continued their statement tracing the authority of the current leadership to Lee and her successors.
Recommended publications
  • John Humphrey Noyes, 1811-1840 : a Social Biography
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1989 John Humphrey Noyes, 1811-1840 : a social biography Susan Adams DuBay Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation DuBay, Susan Adams, "John Humphrey Noyes, 1811-1840 : a social biography" (1989). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3568. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5452 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Susan Adams DuBay for the Master of Arts in History presented June 30, 1989. Title: John Humphrey Noyes, 1811-1840: A Social Biography APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITfEE: Ann Weikel Thomas D. Morris John Humphrey Noyes was the founder of the Oneida Community, one of the most successful utopian ventures in nineteenth-century America. Early in his life, Noyes was a deep religious thinker, but he founded Oneida as an ideal society based on extending the family unit, and not as a church. Noyes's social theories eventually overwhelmed his former religious concentration. 2 The purpose of this thesis is to locate in Noyes's religiously-oriented youth the sources of his social interests. Few scholars have studied in depth the childhood and young manhood of John Humphrey Noyes, but that is where the roots of his social theories are to be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Me0330data.Pdf
    SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS ME-227 State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 HABS ME-227 New Gloucester vicinity Cumberland County Maine PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 Location: State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 New Gloucester vicinity, Cumberland County, Maine The village is located on the east and west sides of State Route 26 Note: For shelving purposes at the Library of Congress, Cumberland County was selected as the main location for Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village. A portion of the village is also located in Androscoggin County. USGS Gray, Mechanic Falls, Minot, Raymond, Maine Quadrangles Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates (NAD83): NW 38711.37 4874057.31 NE 393479.37 487057.18 SE 393477.82 4868742.10 SW 387411.86 486742.35 Present Owner: The Shaker Society (The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing) Present Occupant: Members of the Shaker Society Present Use: Communal Shaker working village and museum Significance: This is the world’s only remaining active Shaker village community that reflects the evolution of Shaker religion and architecture from the late eighteenth century to the present. SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 (Page 2) PART I: HISTORICAL INFORMATION A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. Historical Development: The United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing at Sabbathday Lake, Maine is the world's only remaining active Shaker community.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Bible Argument: John H
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 5 Number 3 Pages 148-173 July 2011 Making the Bible Argument: John H. Noyes’ Mission Statement for the Oneida Community Anthony Wonderley Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Wonderley: Making the Bible Argument Making the Bible Argument: John H. Noyes’ Mission Statement for the Oneida Community By Anthony Wonderley In February of 1848, the man about to found one of America’s most successful utopias composed a plan to bring Christ and social reform to upstate New York entitled Bible Argument: Defining the Relations of the Sexes in the Kingdom of Heaven. The communitarian venture envisioned by John Humphrey Noyes aimed to duplicate life in Christ’s kingdom — a place of communal ownership and group marriage — in order to bring that kingdom to earth. At the same time, the community’s unconventional sexual practices would transform society and correct its ills. As a prospectus for an intentional community, the Bible Argument contains “almost every important idea for the revision of relations between the sexes that Noyes would implement during the subsequent thirty years at Oneida.”1 It explains why the Oneida Community (1848-1880) was to come into being and what it is meant to accomplish. The Bible Argument also provides Noyes’ first public defense of the practice of group marriage initiated a short time before in Putney, Vermont, as well as his first substantive explanation of a free-love doctrine advocated a decade earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ INAME HISTORIC Hancock Shaker Village__________________________________ AND/ORCOMMON Hancock Shaker Village STREET & NUMBER Lebanon Mountain Road ("U.S. Route 201 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Hancock/Pittsfield _. VICINITY OF 1st STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Massachusetts 025 Berkshire 003 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT _PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED X_AGRICULTURE -XMUSEUM __BUILDING(S) X.RRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK _ STRUCTURE __BOTH XXWORK IN PROGRESS ^EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS XXXYES . RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Shaker Community, Incorporated fprincipal owner) STREET& NUMBER P.O. Box 898 CITY. TOWN STATE Pittsfield VICINITY OF Mas s achus e 1.1. LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEoaETc. Berkshire County Registry of Deeds, Middle District STREETS NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Pittsfield Massachusetts REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey DATE 1931, 1959, 1945, 1960, 1962 ^FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY ._LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress, Division of Prints and Photographs CITY, TOWN STATE Washington DC DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X_EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED .^ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS XXALTERED - restored —MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Hancock Shaker Village is located on a 1,000-acre tract of land extending north and south of Lebanon Mountain Road (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustee's Building, Canterbury Shaker Village
    NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES State of New Hampshire, Department of Cultural Resources 603-271-3483 19 Pillsbury Street, 2 nd floor, Concord NH 03301-3570 603-271-3558 Voice/ TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964 FAX 603-271-3433 http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr [email protected] REPORT ON THE TRUSTEES’ BUILDING CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE CANTERBURY, NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES L. GARVIN 18 NOVEMBER 2001 Summary: The Trustees’ Building or office of the Church Family at Canterbury Shaker Village was the chief point of contact and commerce between the Church Family and the World. The building was the first and only brick structure built by the Church Family, and was constructed of materials of exceptional quality and workmanship. Built with fine bricks that were manufactured by the Shakers, the Trustees’ Building reveals much about the Shakers’ skill as brickmakers and as masons. The Trustees’ Building is a structure of statewide significance in the history of masonry construction in New Hampshire. Although built between 1830 and 1832, when the federal style was quickly waning and giving way to the Greek Revival in neighboring communities, the Trustees’ Building is stylistically conservative. Its interior detailing reflects the federal style, as modified and refined by the Shakers, more fully than any other structure at the village and perhaps more fully than any other Shaker building in New Hampshire. The structure therefore possesses stylistic significance as a document of the Shakers’ adoption and modification of an architectural style that was prevalent in the World. The building’s significance in technology, workmanship, and style would make the structure individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places if it were evaluated alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S
    • THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ARCHIVES & RESEARCH CENTER Guide to Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S.Coll.1 by Anne Mansella & Sarah Hayes August 2018 The processing of this collection was funded in part by Mass Humanities, which receives support from the Massachusetts Cultural Council and is an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Archives & Research Center 27 Everett Street, Sharon, MA 02067 www.thetrustees.org [email protected] 781-784-8200 The Trustees of Reservations – www.thetrustees.org Date Contents Box Folder/Item No. Extent: 15 boxes (includes 2 oversize boxes) Linear feet: 15 Copyright © 2018 The Trustees of Reservations ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION PROVENANCE Manuscript materials were first acquired by Clara Endicott Sears beginning in 1918 for her Fruitlands Museum in Harvard, Massachusetts. Materials continued to be collected by the museum throughout the 20th century. In 2016, Fruitlands Museum became The Trustees’ 116th reservation, and the Shaker manuscript materials were relocated to the Archives & Research Center in Sharon, Massachusetts. In Harvard, the Fruitlands Museum site continues to display the objects that Sears collected. The museum features three separate collections of significant Shaker, Native American, and American art and artifacts, as well as a historic farmhouse that was once home to the family of Louisa May Alcott and is recognized as a National Historic Landmark. OWNERSHIP & LITERARY RIGHTS The Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection is the physical property of The Trustees of Reservations. Literary rights, including copyright, belong to the authors or their legal heirs and assigns. RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS This collection is open for research. Some items may be restricted due to handling condition of materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 9 Number 1 Pages 3-39 January 2015 Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Stephen J. Paterwic Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Paterwic: Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God By Stephen J. Paterwic A review of: Shaker Autobiographies, Biographies and Testimonies, 1806-1907, edited by Glendyne R. Wergland and Christian Goodwillie. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014. 3 volume set. Let the Shakers Speak for Themselves In 1824 teenager Mary Antoinette Doolittle felt drawn to the Shakers and sought every opportunity to obtain information about them. By chance, while visiting her grandmother, she encountered two young women who had just left the New Lebanon community. “Mary” was thrilled with the opportunity to hear them tell their story.1 Suddenly “something like a voice” said to her, “Why listen to them? Go to the Shakers, visit, see and learn for yourself who and what they are!”2 This idea is echoed in the testimony of Thomas Stebbins of Enfield, Connecticut, who was not satisfied to hear about the Shakers. “But I had a feeling to go and see them, and judge for myself.” (1:400) Almost two hundred years later, this is still the best advice for people seeking to learn about the Shakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation for a Group Trip to Hancock Shaker Village Before Your Visit Lay a Foundation So That the Youngs
    Preparation for a Group Trip to Hancock Shaker Village Before your visit Lay a foundation so that the youngsters know why they are going on this trip. Talk about things for the students to look for and questions that you hope to answer at the Village. Remember that the outdoor experiences at the Village can be as memorable an indoor ones. Information to help you is included in this package, and more is available on­line at www.hancockshakervillage.org. Plan to divide into small groups, and decide if specific focus topics will be assigned. Perhaps a treasure hunt for things related to a focus topic can make the experience more meaningful. Please review general museum etiquette with your class BEFORE your visit and ON the bus: • Please organize your class into small groups of 5­10 students per adult chaperone. • Students must stay with their chaperones at all times, and chaperones must stay with their assigned groups. • Please walk when inside buildings and use “inside voices.” • Listen respectfully when an interpreter is speaking. • Be respectful and courteous to other visitors. • Food or beverages are not allowed in the historic buildings. • No flash photography is allowed inside the historic buildings. • Be ready to take advantage of a variety of hands­on and minds­on experiences! Arrival Procedure A staff member will greet your group at the designated Drop Off and Pick Up area – clearly marked by signs on our entry driveway and located adjacent to the parking lot and the Visitor Center. We will escort your group to the Picnic Area, which has rest rooms and both indoor and outdoor picnic tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 5 Number 3 Pages 11-137 July 2011 Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Galen Beale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Beale: Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith By Galen Beale And as she turned and looked at an apple tree in full bloom, she exclaimed: — How beautiful this tree looks now! But some of the apples will soon fall off; some will hold on longer; some will hold on till they are half grown and will then fall off; and some will get ripe. So it is with souls that set out in the way of God. Many set out very fair and soon fall away; some will go further, and then fall off, some will go still further and then fall; and some will go through.1 New England was a hotbed of discontent in the second half of the eighteenth century. Both civil and religious events stirred its citizenry to action. Europeans wished to govern this new, resource-rich country, causing continual fighting, and new religions were springing up in reaction to the times. The French and Indian War had aligned the British with the colonists, but that alliance soon dissolved as the British tried to extract from its colonists the cost of protecting them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Family Orchard of the Watervliet Shaker Community
    The Church Family Orchard of the Watervliet Shaker Community Elizabeth Shaver Illustrations by Elizabeth Lee PUBLISHED BY THE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY 25 MEETING HOUSE ROAD ALBANY, N. Y. 12211 www.shakerheritage.org MARCH, 1986 UPDATED APRIL, 2020 A is For Apple 3 Preface to 2020 Edition Just south of the Albany International called Watervliet, in 1776. Having fled Airport, Heritage Lane bends as it turns from persecution for their religious beliefs from Ann Lee Pond and continues past an and practices, the small group in Albany old cemetery. Between the pond and the established the first of what would cemetery is an area of trees, and a glance eventually be a network of 22 communities reveals that they are distinct from those in the Northeast and Midwest United growing in a natural, haphazard fashion in States. The Believers, as they called the nearby Nature Preserve. Evenly spaced themselves, had broken away from the in rows that are still visible, these are apple Quakers in Manchester, England in the trees. They are the remains of an orchard 1750s. They had radical ideas for the time: planted well over 200 years ago. the equality of men and women and of all races, adherence to pacifism, a belief that Both the pond, which once served as a mill celibacy was the only way to achieve a pure pond, and this orchard were created and life and salvation, the confession of sins, a tended by the people who now rest in the devotion to work and collaboration as a adjacent cemetery, which dates from 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • Community, Equality, Simplicity, and Charity the Hancock Shaker Village
    Community, equality, simplicity, and charity Studying and visiting various forms of religion gives one a better insight to the spiritual, philosophical, physical, cultural, social, and psychological understanding about human behavior and the lifestyle of a particular group. This photo program is about the Hancock Shaker Village, a National Historic Landmark in Pittsfield, Massachusetts. The Village includes 20 historic buildings on 750 acres. The staff provide guests with a great deal of insight to the spiritual practices and life among the people called Shakers. Their famous round stone barn is a major attraction at the Village. It is a marvelous place to learn about Shaker life. BACKGROUND “The Protestant Reformation and technological advances led to new Christian sects outside of the Catholic Church and mainstream Protestant denominations into the 17th and 18th centuries. The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, commonly known as the Shakers, was a Protestant sect founded in England in 1747. The French Camisards and the Quakers, two Protestant denominations, both contributed to the formation of Shaker beliefs.” <nps.gov/articles/history-of-the-shakers.htm> “In 1758 Ann Lee joined a sect of Quakers, known as the Shakers, that had been heavily influenced by Camisard preachers. In 1770 she was imprisoned in Manchester for her religious views. During her brief imprisonment, she received several visions from God. Upon her release she became known as “Mother Ann.” “In 1772 Mother Ann received another vision from God in the form of a tree. It communicated that a place had been prepared for she and her followers in America.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1774, a Small Group Left Manchester, England and Arrived in New York
    In 1774, a small group left Manchester, England and entire families. Some joined because they truly arrived in New York City fleeing religious persecution. believed in Shaker values and teachings while oth- They were led by an illiterate textile worker named ers saw it is an alternative to complete destitution. Ann Lee. In 1776, the group, known derisively as the Orphaned children were often raised within the Shaking Quakers, leased a parcel of land near Albany community, and some elected to remain and be- and established a communal religious society. Offi- come Shakers once grown. The Shakers’ population The Watervliet Shaker cemetery is sacred to the Shakers and Shaker Heritage Society visitors alike. cially known as the United Society of Believers in steadily increased throughout the early 19th cen- Four hundred and forty five Shakers were laid to Christ’s Second Appearance, they eventually became tury, reaching a height of 6,000 members through- rest here, including Mother Ann Lee and a number known simply as the Shakers. out all of their communities in 1850. of other influential Shakers. Lee, her brother William, and one other believer were originally The land the Shakers chose was originally known by The next decades saw a decrease in Shaker popula- interred further north on land leased to the Shak- the local Native American name Niskayuna, a refer- tions. Increased industrialization ensured that the ers. In 1835, the Shakers decided to move the ence to extensive corn fields in the area. The town of disadvantaged had more vocational options in urban graves to their present location, to the cemetery Watervliet, Dutch for Water Flood, originally encom- factories.
    [Show full text]