Economic Determinants and Consequences of Political Institutions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Determinants and Consequences of Political Institutions ECONOMIC STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG 225 ________________________ Economic Determinants and Consequences of Political Institutions Oana Borcan ISBN 978-91-88199-05-8 (printed) ISBN 978-91-88199-06-5 (pdf) ISSN 1651-4289 print ISSN 1651-4297 online Printed in Sweden, Gothenburg University 2015 To Amrish, my family and my mentors i ii Acknowledgements First I want to thank my thesis advisors Andreea Mitrut and Ola Olsson. Words cannot do justice to how much help I have received from Andreea, who has been my guide, mentor and friend in this process and beyond. How can I ever repay you? Ola opened my eyes to new ways of thinking, sparked many new interests and showed great trust and optimism in my work. Whether through our joint work or their kind advice, the amount they taught me makes me feel like one exceptionally lucky PhD student. I am deeply indebted to my co-authors Mikael Lindahl and Louis Putterman who have shared their passion and their knowledge and have taken our work to new heights. Mikael has taught me a lot about the value of being a great teacher. Louis has been very generous with his time and with facilitating my visit at Brown University. A big “Thank you!” goes to all the teachers I had through the years here at the University of Gothenburg. Måns Söderbom deserves a special acknowledgement for his meticulous and inspiring teaching method, which I hope to take with me further, and also for his support at critical points. I was also fortunate to receive insightful feedback from Randi Hjalmarsson, who, in addition, was very kind to facilitate my visit at Queen Mary University. This thesis had a great deal of valuable input of my licentiate and higher seminar discussants - Maria Perrotta Berlin and Andrea Tesei. I am thankful to them and also to the many discussants at international conferences, workshops and department seminars at Gothenburg, Brown and Queen Mary. Importantly, the process of building further upon this thesis will be enhanced owing to the fruitful defense discussions. For this I want extend my most sincere thanks to my discussant Sasha Becker and the committee members Katarina Nordblom, Carl-Johan Dalgaard and Nicholas Charron. The wonderful people that work hard to have the department run smoothly and who never spared efforts to assist me also have my utmost admiration and gratitude. To Econ-alla: I have a hard time believing any other economics crowd will ever match your friendliness and kind smiles. I had a wonderful experience in Gothenburg being surrounded by lovely colleagues and friends. I will miss all the friends in my PhD generation, from my “PhD Sisters”: Simona, Marcela, Anja and Diem, to Reda, Joakim, Emil, Remidius, Sied, Xiao-Bing and Hang. A special place in my heart is of course reserved for Simona, who has been my “partner in crime”. We shared the good and the less glamorous PhD and life experiences and the friendship we forged is one of the best things in my life. Speaking of life outside PhD, I am happy to have made some fantastic friends here in Gothenburg, people that inspire me every time: Vali, Lavinia, Costel, Andrea, Efi, Mitesh, Verena, Simon, Vlad, Andrei. I thank you all and I will also forever be thankful to my lovely lifelong friends Flavia, Veronica and Corina, who have been by my side through thick and thin. Going back in time, I nostalgically remember two teachers who have laid the foundation of my work: Valeria Suster and Marian Ursarescu have given me the words and the maths to get where I am today. I will never forget you! It should be the easiest to talk about my family's input in this achievement. Yet words cannot express how much of this is their work. Besides their love, they instilled in me values essential to an academic career: My mother has been a wonderful, kind and dedicated teacher in just about everything. My father has, from a very young age, inspired me to read, ask, travel, search and discover. I've also learnt a thing or two about “constructive criticism” from them... And the award for most patience, understanding, tireless support and unyielding belief that all will be well goes to my life companion - Amrish. I cannot imagine what the past five years would have been without your love and wisdom. This virtually became your second PhD, so enjoy the fruits of your work! Iti multumesc pentru tot si te iubesc mult! To all of you I promise to do my best to give back and pass along to others all the good you gave me! iii iv Contents Acknowledgements iii 1 Introduction 1 The historical role of institutions 2 Economic determinants and consequences of corruption 3 References 6 2 State History and Economic Development: Evidence from Six Millenia 11 Introduction 12 Literature review 14 Theoretical framework 19 Data 26 State history and economic development 30 Conclusions 39 References 40 Figures and tables 44 Appendices 53 3 The Impact of an Unexpected Wage Cut on Corruption: Evidence from the “Xeroxed Exam” 85 Introduction 86 Background 90 Data and descriptive statistics 95 Estimation strategy and baseline results 97 Sensitivity analysis and alternative explanations 101 Conclusion 111 References 112 Figures and tables 115 Appendices 127 4 Fighting Corruption in Education: What Works and Who Benefits? 135 Introduction 136 Background 140 Data 144 Graphical evidence 146 Estimation strategy 147 Results 149 v The short-term impact of the anti-corruption campaign: Preliminary evidence from admission into an elite university 158 Conclusions and discussion 161 References 162 Figures and tables 166 Appendices 177 5 The Benefits of Local Party Alignment in National Elections 191 Introduction 192 Literature review 194 Institutional setting 196 Data 200 Identification strategy 204 Results 209 Persistence of alignment: government transfers following elections 216 Concluding remarks 218 References 220 Figures and tables 225 Appendix 240 vi Introduction Political institutions are inextricably linked with economic performance, a relation- ship that goes both ways. Institutions drive growth by, for instance, securing prop- erty rights and enforcing contracts. Institutions themselves are determined by the dynamics of economic growth since, for instance, contract enforcement depends on wealth. The prominence of institutions in understanding economic performance dates to the seminal work of North (1990). His work spurred a new empirical tradition that broadly links country-level aggregates of growth, like income per capita, with measures of institutional quality, like the rule of law (e.g. Knack and Keefer 1995; Rodrik et al. 2004). While the data revealed that institutions may play an even bigger role in a nation's prosperity than initial conditions, like biogeography, it re- mained silent on how to achieve good institutions. In response another research tradition developed concurrently, focusing on specific cases of institutional failure and corrective policy interventions. The realization that bad governance and corrup- tion were severely undermining poverty alleviation efforts was a major motivation for this approach. Our enhanced understanding of institutions has no doubt contributed to the large reductions in poverty (from 50% to 21% of citizens in developing countries since 1981). However, challenges remain. Inequality is rising fast (OECD 2011); in 2000 the income levels of the richest and poorest countries differed by a factor of 200, in 2014 that factor was nearly 250.1 In light of these dynamics, it is of critical importance to examine and reexamine where and why institutions fail. Are today's development challenges inherited from history or artefacts of the modern world? What are the implications of dysfunctional institutions for key aspects of socio-economic development, like education and democracy? This thesis answers these questions with four empirical essays on the economic determinants and consequences of political institutions. It opens with a broad per- spective on the link between the state throughout history and the past and current economic performance of nations. Remaining chapters focus on a particular form of institutional failure \endemic corruption" with illustrations of its harmful impact on key development areas: human capital formation and democracy. More specifically, chapters two and three identify causal links between public sector wages, monitoring 1In 2000, the GDP per capita of the richest country in the world, Qatar, was 112,283 USD and that of the poorest, The Democratic Republic of Congo, was 518 USD. In 2014 Qatar's per capita GDP was 139,456 USD and the Central African Republic's was 566 USD. [World Bank data: GDP in constant 2011 international dollars using PPP rates]. 1 and incentives and corruption in education. The final chapter examines the clien- telistic structure of electoral politics showing that local politicians influence national elections by vote buying and electoral fraud. The historical role of institutions The experience with state institutions has been put forth as one of the important correlates of the current wealth distribution in the world. In order to capture the modern day nations' accumulated experience of large-scale political organization, Bockstette, Chanda and Putterman (2002) have created the State antiquity index. This index reflected all forms and changes of government above tribal level, between 1-1950 CE, for each of 159 countries defined by modern-day borders. The authors showed that this indicator of state experience was positively associated with 1995 income and with the 1960-1995 GDP growth rate. Other studies confirmed this empirical pattern, besides demonstrating that this \persistence of fortune" is not a localized phenomenon, but is reinforced by migration between countries (Putterman and Weil, 2010). The examples of former colonies that have gained independence late in the 20th century and are therefore much younger and inexperienced states than European states like the United Kingdom and France are in line with these findings.
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Actions in the Framework of the Action Plan for 2013
    Appendix 6 Summary of Actions in the framework of the Action Plan for 2013-2015 for Implementation of the Strategy of the IGC TRACECA This document is based on the Reports submitted by Azerbaijan, Armenia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Romania, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Ukraine. № Action Short description Obtained results 1 Elaborate five-year Elaboration of national investment In Azerbaijan the implementation of the Governmental concept Programme for infrastructure master plans strategies regarding transport sector development of transport sector is on-going and in accordance with this Programme a based on an adequate methodology for number of laws and normative acts were adopted. infrastructure planning and prioritization The Strategy of transport sector investment is implemented in accordance with the based on the identification of the National Strategy for transport infrastructure planning which is a component of the “bottlenecks” and the use of traffic Governmental concept Programme. forecasts Armenia implements the National Transport Strategy for 2009-2019. One of the priority strategic projects is the infrastructure project for the construction of the North-South Corridor. The programme for development of road infrastructure is composed for 5 years. The allocation programme is updated once in 3 years. In Bulgaria there is applied the Strategy for Development of Transport Infrastructure within the framework of the National Strategy of Integrated Infrastructure Development up to 2015. The Operative Programme of the following programming period 2014-2020 is at the stage of preparation. Annually Georgia works out an action plan for the development of road infrastructure for international main and subsidiary roads. “The Roads Department of Georgia” realized the following construction projects during 2014: - Construction of 32.1 km section Kutaisi bypass-Samtredia of at E60 (JICA) - Construction of 8 km section for Ruisi – Agara E60 Road (WB).
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova by Sergiu Miscoiu
    Moldova by Sergiu Miscoiu Capital: Chişinău Population: 3.6 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$3,630 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Civil Society 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Independent Media 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 National Democratic Governance 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 Local Democratic Governance 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 Corruption 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 Democracy Score 5.07 4.96 4.96 5.00 5.07 5.14 4.96 4.89 4.82 4.86 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan Declaration
    epp eurepopean peoplep’s party european people’s party Yerevan Declaration 2nd European People’s Party Eastern Partnership Leaders’ Summit 30 November 2012 Yerevan Declaration 01 2nd European People’s Party Eastern Partnership Leaders’ Summit, 30 November 2012 The European People’s Party Eastern Partnership Leaders assembled in Yerevan, 1. Whereas the Eastern Partnership countries have committed themselves to res- pect and promote international law and fundamental values, including democracy, rule of law, human-rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as good governance, 2. Whereas article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union states: “The Union is foun- ded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail”, 3. Whereas every country has the sovereign right to join any international organisa- tion or alliance and to define its own future, 4. Whereas the Eastern Partnership countries are not just neighbours but the Euro- pean neighbours of the European Union, 5. Whereas the European People’s Party Eastern Partnership Leaders adopted the Batumi Declaration on the 10 July 2012 asking for more content for the Eastern Partnership and stating the need to entrench in its scope the offer of a clear Euro- pean perspective to the Eastern Partners who are willing and acting accordingly, 6. Whereas the respect for fundamental values, rights and freedoms is the cor- nerstone for the relations the European Union is willing to establish with nonEU states, Fundamental values and Human Rights 7.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Wroclaw Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of International Studies
    University of Wroclaw Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of International Studies Veronica Russu The EU Comprehensive Institution Building programme - Opportunities for the Development of the Public Institutions in the selected Eastern Partnership countries: Georgia and Moldova Doctoral thesis supervised by: prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Stadtmüller and dr Renata Kunert-Milcarz Wroclaw, 2020 Uniwersytet Wrocławski Wydział Nauk Społecznych Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych Veronica Russu Kompleksowy program rozwoju instytucjonalnego UE - Możliwości rozwoju Instytucji Publicznych w wybranych krajach Partnerstwa Wschodniego: Gruzji i Mołdawii Praca doktorska pod kierunkiem: prof. dr hab. Elżbiety Stadtmüller i dr Renaty Kunert-Milcarz Wrocław, 2020 Table of contents List of abbreviations Aknowledgements Introduction………………………………………………………...……………….…....8 Chapter I Theoretical perspectives of institutionalism, and of the Europeanization of the institutional approach .……………………………………….………………….21 1.1. Theoretical delimitation: institutional theory, theory of institutions and institutionalism ……………………..…………………………………………….21 1.2. New institutionalism in EU studies: current debates ……………………...…….23 1.3. Conceptual dimensions: transformation approach and institutional change ….....42 1.4. Europeanization as institutional-building …………........................................…..50 Chapter II The European Neighbourhood Policy: context and implementation ......57 2.1. European Neighbourhood Policy: origins and objectives …….……………...…..57 2.2. The Eastern Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Relation Between the Level of Development and Government Systems? an Overview on Latin America, Euroasia and the East Asia Ph
    20 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EURASIAN ECONOMIES 2016 Is There a Relation Between the Level of Development and Government Systems? An Overview on Latin America, Euroasia and the East Asia Ph. D. Candidate Yaşar Pınar Özmen (Gazi University, Turkey) Prof. Dr. Gonca Bayraktar Durgun (Gazi University, Turkey) Abstract The purpose of this paper is to study if a meaningful relation can be argued between government systems and the level of development by using main socioeconomic indicators. The systems of government in the Latin American, Eurasian and the East Asian countries are classified as presidentialism, president– parliamentary, premier – presidential and parliamentarism. For the aim of the paper, the countries are selected according to the two criteria, population and income. On the basis of 1995-2013 annual data, the time series are obtained from the international organizations and research institutes. The panel data analysis covers socioeconomic indicators (population, gross domestic product per capita, unemployment rate) and some composite indicators (human development index and democracy scores). 1 Introduction The debate on government systems flared up in the aftermath of the dissolution of Yugoslavia and of the Soviet Union. In the early 1990s, the argument that there was a qualitative difference in terms of democratic persistence and consolidation between the parliamentary system and the presidential system was the focal point of the debate. During the same period, the institutional structures of democratic governments replacing the military dictatorships in Latin America and Asia were a particular area of research for political science. The comparison effort of the new period to that of military coups or of the earlier interruption of democratic order has been widespread in academic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova June 7–27, 2014
    Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova June 7–27, 2014 International Republican Institute Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by the public opinion and market research company Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova June 7–27, 2014, through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ home. • The sample consisted of 1,200 permanent residents of Moldova older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, education, region and size of the settlement. • All regions of Moldova were surveyed (excluding Transnistria). Multistage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday respondent’s selection procedures: • Stage one: districts were grouped into 11 groups. • Stage two: selection of the settlements – cities and villages. Settlements were selected at random. The number of selected settlements in each region was proportional to the share of population living in a particular type of the settlement in each region. • Stage three: primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. • Response rate was 54 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. 2 Growing Support for Democracy International Republican Institute How satisfied are you with the way democracy
    [Show full text]