Yerevan Declaration
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Summary of Actions in the Framework of the Action Plan for 2013
Appendix 6 Summary of Actions in the framework of the Action Plan for 2013-2015 for Implementation of the Strategy of the IGC TRACECA This document is based on the Reports submitted by Azerbaijan, Armenia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Romania, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Ukraine. № Action Short description Obtained results 1 Elaborate five-year Elaboration of national investment In Azerbaijan the implementation of the Governmental concept Programme for infrastructure master plans strategies regarding transport sector development of transport sector is on-going and in accordance with this Programme a based on an adequate methodology for number of laws and normative acts were adopted. infrastructure planning and prioritization The Strategy of transport sector investment is implemented in accordance with the based on the identification of the National Strategy for transport infrastructure planning which is a component of the “bottlenecks” and the use of traffic Governmental concept Programme. forecasts Armenia implements the National Transport Strategy for 2009-2019. One of the priority strategic projects is the infrastructure project for the construction of the North-South Corridor. The programme for development of road infrastructure is composed for 5 years. The allocation programme is updated once in 3 years. In Bulgaria there is applied the Strategy for Development of Transport Infrastructure within the framework of the National Strategy of Integrated Infrastructure Development up to 2015. The Operative Programme of the following programming period 2014-2020 is at the stage of preparation. Annually Georgia works out an action plan for the development of road infrastructure for international main and subsidiary roads. “The Roads Department of Georgia” realized the following construction projects during 2014: - Construction of 32.1 km section Kutaisi bypass-Samtredia of at E60 (JICA) - Construction of 8 km section for Ruisi – Agara E60 Road (WB). -
Moldova by Sergiu Miscoiu
Moldova by Sergiu Miscoiu Capital: Chişinău Population: 3.6 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$3,630 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Civil Society 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Independent Media 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 National Democratic Governance 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 Local Democratic Governance 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 Corruption 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 Democracy Score 5.07 4.96 4.96 5.00 5.07 5.14 4.96 4.89 4.82 4.86 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. -
University of Wroclaw Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of International Studies
University of Wroclaw Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of International Studies Veronica Russu The EU Comprehensive Institution Building programme - Opportunities for the Development of the Public Institutions in the selected Eastern Partnership countries: Georgia and Moldova Doctoral thesis supervised by: prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Stadtmüller and dr Renata Kunert-Milcarz Wroclaw, 2020 Uniwersytet Wrocławski Wydział Nauk Społecznych Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych Veronica Russu Kompleksowy program rozwoju instytucjonalnego UE - Możliwości rozwoju Instytucji Publicznych w wybranych krajach Partnerstwa Wschodniego: Gruzji i Mołdawii Praca doktorska pod kierunkiem: prof. dr hab. Elżbiety Stadtmüller i dr Renaty Kunert-Milcarz Wrocław, 2020 Table of contents List of abbreviations Aknowledgements Introduction………………………………………………………...……………….…....8 Chapter I Theoretical perspectives of institutionalism, and of the Europeanization of the institutional approach .……………………………………….………………….21 1.1. Theoretical delimitation: institutional theory, theory of institutions and institutionalism ……………………..…………………………………………….21 1.2. New institutionalism in EU studies: current debates ……………………...…….23 1.3. Conceptual dimensions: transformation approach and institutional change ….....42 1.4. Europeanization as institutional-building …………........................................…..50 Chapter II The European Neighbourhood Policy: context and implementation ......57 2.1. European Neighbourhood Policy: origins and objectives …….……………...…..57 2.2. The Eastern Partnership -
Economic Determinants and Consequences of Political Institutions
ECONOMIC STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND LAW UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG 225 ________________________ Economic Determinants and Consequences of Political Institutions Oana Borcan ISBN 978-91-88199-05-8 (printed) ISBN 978-91-88199-06-5 (pdf) ISSN 1651-4289 print ISSN 1651-4297 online Printed in Sweden, Gothenburg University 2015 To Amrish, my family and my mentors i ii Acknowledgements First I want to thank my thesis advisors Andreea Mitrut and Ola Olsson. Words cannot do justice to how much help I have received from Andreea, who has been my guide, mentor and friend in this process and beyond. How can I ever repay you? Ola opened my eyes to new ways of thinking, sparked many new interests and showed great trust and optimism in my work. Whether through our joint work or their kind advice, the amount they taught me makes me feel like one exceptionally lucky PhD student. I am deeply indebted to my co-authors Mikael Lindahl and Louis Putterman who have shared their passion and their knowledge and have taken our work to new heights. Mikael has taught me a lot about the value of being a great teacher. Louis has been very generous with his time and with facilitating my visit at Brown University. A big “Thank you!” goes to all the teachers I had through the years here at the University of Gothenburg. Måns Söderbom deserves a special acknowledgement for his meticulous and inspiring teaching method, which I hope to take with me further, and also for his support at critical points. -
Is There a Relation Between the Level of Development and Government Systems? an Overview on Latin America, Euroasia and the East Asia Ph
20 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EURASIAN ECONOMIES 2016 Is There a Relation Between the Level of Development and Government Systems? An Overview on Latin America, Euroasia and the East Asia Ph. D. Candidate Yaşar Pınar Özmen (Gazi University, Turkey) Prof. Dr. Gonca Bayraktar Durgun (Gazi University, Turkey) Abstract The purpose of this paper is to study if a meaningful relation can be argued between government systems and the level of development by using main socioeconomic indicators. The systems of government in the Latin American, Eurasian and the East Asian countries are classified as presidentialism, president– parliamentary, premier – presidential and parliamentarism. For the aim of the paper, the countries are selected according to the two criteria, population and income. On the basis of 1995-2013 annual data, the time series are obtained from the international organizations and research institutes. The panel data analysis covers socioeconomic indicators (population, gross domestic product per capita, unemployment rate) and some composite indicators (human development index and democracy scores). 1 Introduction The debate on government systems flared up in the aftermath of the dissolution of Yugoslavia and of the Soviet Union. In the early 1990s, the argument that there was a qualitative difference in terms of democratic persistence and consolidation between the parliamentary system and the presidential system was the focal point of the debate. During the same period, the institutional structures of democratic governments replacing the military dictatorships in Latin America and Asia were a particular area of research for political science. The comparison effort of the new period to that of military coups or of the earlier interruption of democratic order has been widespread in academic studies. -
Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova June 7–27, 2014
Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova June 7–27, 2014 International Republican Institute Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by the public opinion and market research company Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova June 7–27, 2014, through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ home. • The sample consisted of 1,200 permanent residents of Moldova older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, education, region and size of the settlement. • All regions of Moldova were surveyed (excluding Transnistria). Multistage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday respondent’s selection procedures: • Stage one: districts were grouped into 11 groups. • Stage two: selection of the settlements – cities and villages. Settlements were selected at random. The number of selected settlements in each region was proportional to the share of population living in a particular type of the settlement in each region. • Stage three: primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. • Response rate was 54 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. 2 Growing Support for Democracy International Republican Institute How satisfied are you with the way democracy