DOCSLIB.ORG

A Nordic Textile Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TemaNord 2015:513 TemaNord TemaNord 2015:513 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org A Nordic textile strategy Part II: A proposal for increased collection, sorting, reuse and recycling of textiles A Nordic textile strategy The proposed strategy for increased reuse and recycling of textiles provides a starting point for the work towards a more sustainable textile and fashion sector in the Nordic region. It is focused on the increased collection, sorting, reuse and recycling in the region and thereby provides one part of the sustainability puzzle in the sector. The proposed strategy includes incentives, policy measures and measures needed on local, regional, national and Nordic levels to ensure successful implementation. The report is part of the Nordic Prime Ministers’ overall green growth initiative: “The Nordic Region – leading in green growth” – read more in the web magazine “Green Growth the Nordic Way” at www.nordicway.org or at www.norden.org/ greengrowth TemaNord 2015:513 ISBN 978-92-893-3968-1 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-3970-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-3969-8 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 TN2015513 omslag.indd 1 24-02-2015 13:10:23 A Nordic textile strategy Part II: A proposal for increased collection, sorting, reuse and recycling of textiles David Palm, Maria Elander, David Watson, Nikola Kiørboe, Hanna Salmenperä, Helena Dahlbo, Synnøve Rubach, Ole-Jørgen Hanssen, Stefán Gíslason, Are-Severin Ingulfsvann and Øystein Nystad TemaNord 2015:513 A Nordic textile strategy Part II: A proposal for increased collection, sorting, reuse and recycling of textiles David Palm, Maria Elander, David Watson, Nikola Kiørboe, Hanna Salmenperä, Helena Dahlbo, Synnøve Rubach, Ole-Jørgen Hanssen, Stefán Gíslason, Are-Severin Ingulfsvann and Øystein Nystad ISBN 978-92-893-3968-1 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-3970-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-3969-8 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/ANP2015-513 TemaNord 2015:513 ISSN 0908-6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2014 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: Signelements Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers. However, the contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or recom- mendations of the Nordic Council of Ministers. www.norden.org/en/publications Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involv- ing Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an im- portant role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. Nordic Council of Ministers Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 www.norden.org Content Key messages ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 11 The proposed Nordic Strategy ........................................................................................ 25 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 27 2. Structure of the Nordic Strategy............................................................................................. 29 3. Targets giving direction for the Nordic region.................................................................. 31 4. Necessary changes for reaching the Nordic targets ........................................................ 33 5. Policy measures facilitating change ...................................................................................... 35 5.1 Policy measures considered ....................................................................................... 35 5.2 Evaluation and selection of policy measures........................................................ 35 5.3 Description of selected policy measures ................................................................ 37 5.4 Assessment of the selected policy mix .................................................................... 44 6. Supporting structures for implementation ........................................................................ 51 7. Role of and impacts on stakeholders .................................................................................... 53 7.1 Fashion and textile industry ....................................................................................... 53 7.2 Consumers ........................................................................................................................ 54 7.3 Collection companies and organisations................................................................ 54 7.4 Sorting companies and organisations ..................................................................... 55 7.5 Reuse companies and organisations ....................................................................... 55 7.6 Recycling companies and organisations ................................................................ 56 7.7 Municipalities................................................................................................................... 56 7.8 Entrepreneurs.................................................................................................................. 57 8. Key actors for successful implementation of the Nordic Strategy ............................ 59 8.1 The NCM/NAG and a Nordic coordinating body for textiles ........................... 59 8.2 National governments .................................................................................................. 60 8.3 Municipalities................................................................................................................... 61 8.4 Entrepreneurs.................................................................................................................. 61 Prognosis for future amounts ......................................................................................... 63 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................. 65 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 67 2. Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 69 3. Current trends in net imports of new textiles ................................................................... 71 3.1 Method and data availability ...................................................................................... 71 3.2 Denmark ............................................................................................................................ 73 3.3 Finland ................................................................................................................................ 73 3.4 Iceland ................................................................................................................................ 74 3.5 Norway ............................................................................................................................... 75 3.6 Sweden ............................................................................................................................... 76 3.7 Nordic region ................................................................................................................... 77 4. Current trends in production of new textiles .................................................................... 79 4.1 Methods and data availability .................................................................................... 79 4.2 Denmark ............................................................................................................................ 81 4.3 Finland ............................................................................................................................... 82 4.4 Iceland ................................................................................................................................ 83 4.5 Norway ............................................................................................................................... 84 4.6 Sweden ............................................................................................................................... 85 4.7 Nordic region ................................................................................................................... 86 5. Current trends in textile waste management .................................................................... 89 5.1 Changing attitudes ......................................................................................................... 89 5.2 Trends in sorting and recycling of used textiles ................................................. 91 6. Prognosis of
Recommended publications
  • 5.0 Kerbside Contents

    5.0 Kerbside Contents

    WEEE Collection Good Practice Guidance 1 5.0 Kerbside Contents 5.1 Bulky waste 01 5.1.1 Interacting with local reuse schemes 01 5.1.2 Identifying reusable items 02 5.1.3 Collection arrangements 02 5.2 Staff training 04 5.3 Handling and storage 05 5.4 Contractual arrangements 06 5.5 Small Mixed WEEE collections 07 WEEE Collection Good Practice Guidance 1 Audience: The primary audience for this section of the guidance is waste collection authorities (and their contractors). However, third sector organisations and producer compliance schemes will also be interested in this guidance. Benefits: The benefit to the collection authorities of implementing this good practice is to maximise the WEEE that is segregated for reuse and recycling through their kerbside/bulky waste collections. Producer compliance schemes will find this section of interest as they can benefit from innovative collection methods and may wish to discuss appropriate approved recycling and reuse routes with the local authorities. Third sector organisations will find the guidance of value by understanding how they can support waste collection authorities to maximise diversion of WEEE for reuse. Summary: This chapter considers the options available to waste collection authorities for maximising reuse and recycling of WEEE, through kerbside/ bulky waste collections, bring banks and ad hoc collections such as WEEE amnesties. Advice is therefore provided on how to identify reusable items, how to raise awareness of reuse avenues with householders and how to interact with local reuse schemes so they provide the level of service required. Useful sources of information of relevance to this section of the guidance are available from the Furniture Reuse Network.
  • Standardising Kerbside Collections in Aotearoa

    Standardising Kerbside Collections in Aotearoa

    Recommendations for standardisation of kerbside collections in Aotearoa Prepared for Ministry for the Environment May 2020 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STANDARDISATION OF KERBSIDE COLLECTIONS IN AOTEAROA DOCUMENT QUALITY CONTROL Version Date Written by Distributed to Sarah Pritchett (WasteMINZ) and Draft 0.1 29 May 2020 Sunshine Yates (Sunshine Stephen Goodman Yates Consulting) on behalf of WasteMINZ Sarah Pritchett and Draft 0.2 10 June 2020 Stephen Goodman Sunshine Yates Sarah Pritchett and Final 1.0 26 June 2020 Stephen Goodman Sunshine Yates CONTACT DETAILS Ministry for the Environment WasteMINZ Stephen Goodman Sarah Pritchett Policy Manager Sustainability Advisor 23 Kate Sheppard Place PO Box 305426 Thorndon Triton Plaza Wellington 6143 Auckland 0757 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Project Managers acknowledges the time, expertise and guidance provided by the members of the Steering Group and Oversight Group in preparing this report. Steering Group Oversight Group Duncan Wilson (Chair) - Eunomia Research and Consulting Stephen Goodman (Chair) - MfE Mike Jones - Earthcare Environmental Shaun Lewis - MfE Rick Thorpe - Xtreme Zero Waste/Zero Waste Network Parul Sood - Auckland Council Rob Wilson - Eco Central Jason Krupp - Local Government New Zealand Angela Atkins - Hastings District Council Pamela Ritchie - MfE Janine Brinsdon - WasteMINZ Rodrick Boys - MfE Stephen Goodman - MfE The Project Managers also thank each and every local authority representative and waste and resource recovery industry representative that generously gave of their time and expertise
  • All Hands Are Enjoined to Spin : Textile Production in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts." (1996)

    All Hands Are Enjoined to Spin : Textile Production in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts." (1996)

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth- century Massachusetts. Susan M. Ouellette University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Ouellette, Susan M., "All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth-century Massachusetts." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1224. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1224 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMASS/AMHERST c c: 315DLDb0133T[] i !3 ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 1996 History ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Approved as to style and content by: So Barry/ J . Levy^/ Chair c konJL WI_ Xa LaaAj Gerald McFarland, Member Neal Salisbury, Member Patricia Warner, Member Bruce Laurie, Department Head History (^Copyright by Susan Poland Ouellette 1996 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS FEBRUARY 1996 SUSAN M. OUELLETTE, B.A., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PLATTSBURGH M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Barry J.
  • Waste Management Guidance for Residents

    Waste Management Guidance for Residents

    Kent County Council Waste Management Guide to household waste disposal Guidance document for residents September 2019 4 kent.gov.uk This document can be made available in other formats or languages. To request this, please email [email protected] or telephone 03000 421553 (text relay service 18001 03000 421553). This number goes to an answer machine, which is monitored during office hours. Or write to: Kent County Council, Diversity & Equality Team Room G37, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ 2 Contents Responsibility for Waste Background Information 4 Roles of Authorities in Kent & Current Performance 5 Waste Segregation 6-17 Household Waste Recycling Centres 18-20 Conclusion 21 Waste Collection Authority Contacts 22 Quicklinks 23 Kent County Council Waste Management Mission Our Ambition is to deliver a high quality household waste disposal service, whilst remaining cost- effective for the people of Kent, with an emphasis on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and achieving zero landfill 3 Collection and disposal of waste Background Information Kent County Council (KCC) works in partnership with the Kent District and Borough Councils to find the best solution for the household waste that requires disposal. The aim of this document is to provide clear guidance to residents so they can dispose of their waste in a way that is in line with the Waste Hierarchy enabling waste to be reduced, reused or recycled where possible; and waste being sent for incineration or landfill is as minimal as possible. Prevention Most preferred Preparing for re-use Recycling Other recovery Disposal Least preferred 4 Roles of authorities in Kent District and Borough Councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCAs) and they are responsible for collecting household waste from residents’ houses, referred to as kerbside collections.
  • National Waste Report 2018 19 NOVEMBER 2018

    National Waste Report 2018 19 NOVEMBER 2018

    National Waste Report 2018 19 NOVEMBER 2018 PREPARED FOR Department of the Environment and Energy PREPARED IN ASSOCIATION WITH Report title National Waste Report 2018 Client Department of the Environment and Energy Status Final Authors Joe Pickin, Paul Randell, Jenny Trinh, Bill Grant Data analysts Luke Richmond, Joe Pickin Reviewers Christine Wardle, Luke Richmond Project number P863 Report date 19 November 2018 Contract date 20 September 2017 Information current to 1 July 2018 Copyright Department of the Environment and Energy; Blue Environment Pty Ltd Disclaimer This report has been prepared for Department of the Environment and Energy in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment dated 20 September 2017, and is based on the assumptions and exclusions set out in our scope of work. Information in this document is current as of 1 July 2018. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing this report, Blue Environment Pty Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Blue Environment Pty Ltd. © Department of the Environment and Energy; Blue Environment Pty Ltd Blue Environment prints on 100% recycled paper Blue Environment Pty Ltd ABN 78 118 663 997 Suite 209, 838 Collins St, Docklands Vic 3008 Email: [email protected] Web: www.blueenvironment.com.au Phone: +61 3 9081 0440 / +61 3 5426 3536 Contents At a glance ..................................................................................................................................
  • Analysis of the Performance of Sewing Threads Manufactured from Conventional and Compact Ring-Spun Yarns

    Analysis of the Performance of Sewing Threads Manufactured from Conventional and Compact Ring-Spun Yarns

    Sevil Yeşilpınar Analysis of the Performance of Sewing Dokuz Eylul University Threads Manufactured from Conventional Department of Textile Engineering 35100 Bornova, İzmir, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] and Compact Ring-spun Yarns Abstract The compact spinning system produces a yarn structure which is different from the structure of conventional spun yarn as the result of the elimination of the spinning triangle. New perspectives introduced by compact spinning have proved their worth in all textile processes, from yarn production to the finishing stages. In this study, the seam strengths of sewing threads produced by conventional and compact spun-ring systems were investigated together with strength tests before and after washing. The results were evaluated with SPSS software. It was found out that the difference between the seam strength of sewing threads produced from conventional ring and compact yarns were not of major statistical significance, and nor was the difference in seem strength before and after washing. Additionally, the effect of the gassing process on compact sewing threads was established. The results allow us to recommende that the gassing process should not be applied to sewing threads made of compact yarns. Key words: seam strength, compact yarn, sewing thread, gassing. distinctive features of compact yarns. In the compact spinning system, elimi- The basic alteration in the compact spin- nating the spinning triangle almost en- ning system, which is the modified form tirely in the yarn formation zone allows of the ring spinning system, is that the even very short fibres to contribute to drawing system of compact spinning ma- strength in this zone where fibres have chine finishes with a condensation zone no twist.
  • Impact of Doubling and Auto Leveling in Draw Frame on the Quality of Rotor-Spun Yarns

    Impact of Doubling and Auto Leveling in Draw Frame on the Quality of Rotor-Spun Yarns

    Crimson Publishers Research Article Wings to the Research Impact of Doubling and Auto leveling in Draw Frame on the Quality of Rotor-Spun Yarns Subrata Kumar Saha and Jamal Hossen* Department of Textile Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Te- jgaon I/A, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh Abstract ISSN: 2578-0271 This study explores the impact of doubling and auto leveling in draw frame on the quality of rotor yarns. Virgin cotton of Ivory Coast (55%) and waste cotton (dropping-1: 25% and dropping-2: 20%) used as raw material. Rotor-spun yarns of 20 Ne were manufactured from the slivers produced from carding machine, of slivers and rotor yarns such as Um%, CVm%, Imperfections (thick place, thin place, and neps), and countbreaker strength draw frame, product and (CSP) finisher were draw tested frame and analyzed.without and The with Um%, auto CVm% leveler. of different The quality sliver parameters gradually decreased due to the action of doubling and auto leveler. In yarns, Um%, CVm% showed a similar trend as slivers. Thick places, thin places and neps also exhibited the decreasing pattern with the increase of sliver doubling and the use of auto leveler. The quality of yarns improved with the increase of doubling ofand doubling yarns produced and auto from leveling. finisher draw frame sliver with auto leveler showed the best result. The reason can be attributed to the most evened out sliver with better fiber orientation due to the combined action Keywords: Doubling; Auto leveler; Neps; Imperfections *Corresponding author: Jamal Hossen, Department of Textile Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Introduction Technology, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh The textile industry belongs to the oldest industrial branches and maintaining its sustained growth for improving the quality of human life.
  • Your Recycling and Refuse Service Standards

    Your Recycling and Refuse Service Standards

    Your Recycling and Refuse Service Standards for Lewisham 1 What are Service Standards? Service Standards set out the standards that residents can expect from the Council regarding both recycling and refuse collection services. These services have a major impact, making Lewisham a great place to live, but we need your support and commitment. This is why the standards also outline what we need from you. Please visit www.lewisham.gov.uk/recycling for more information and keep this leaflet to refer to, thank you. Recycling We will provide a weekly collection of your paper, cardboard, glass, cans, plastic bottles, mixed plastics, beverage cartons (Tetra Pak) and shredded paper from your recycling wheelie bins, green boxes, clear sacks and large communal bins. Our promise Your role One of the following will be provided for Please contact us to let us know what kerbside properties and flats for recycling: recycling facilities you require. Recycling wheelie bins (kerbside). When recycling please ensure that you: Clear sacks (flats). Place the correct materials in the Communal recycling bins (estates/flats). recycling bin, loose if possible. Green reusable recycling estates bags Do not use black refuse sacks (these (estates). will not be collected). Your recycling crew will only empty recycling Wheelie bins and sacks must be bins and clear transparent sacks that contain moved to the inside edge of your the correct materials. property and be clear of obstructions. Leave recycling bins and clear sacks out by 6am on the correct collection day. 2 Our promise Your role We will return your recycling bin to the Please put the returned bin back to its outside edge of your property.
  • Waste Management

    Waste Management

    10 Waste Management Coordinating Lead Authors: Jean Bogner (USA) Lead Authors: Mohammed Abdelrafie Ahmed (Sudan), Cristobal Diaz (Cuba), Andre Faaij (The Netherlands), Qingxian Gao (China), Seiji Hashimoto (Japan), Katarina Mareckova (Slovakia), Riitta Pipatti (Finland), Tianzhu Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Luis Diaz (USA), Peter Kjeldsen (Denmark), Suvi Monni (Finland) Review Editors: Robert Gregory (UK), R.T.M. Sutamihardja (Indonesia) This chapter should be cited as: Bogner, J., M. Abdelrafie Ahmed, C. Diaz, A. Faaij, Q. Gao, S. Hashimoto, K. Mareckova, R. Pipatti, T. Zhang, Waste Management, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Waste Management Chapter 10 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................. 587 10.5 Policies and measures: waste management and climate ....................................................... 607 10.1 Introduction .................................................... 588 10.5.1 Reducing landfill CH4 emissions .......................607 10.2 Status of the waste management sector ..... 591 10.5.2 Incineration and other thermal processes for waste-to-energy ...............................................608 10.2.1 Waste generation ............................................591 10.5.3 Waste minimization, re-use and
  • Impact Assessment

    Impact Assessment

    Title: Reforming the UK packaging producer responsibility Impact Assessment (IA) system Date: 18/01/2021 Stage: Consultation IA No: Source of intervention: Domestic RPC Reference No: Secondary legislation Lead department or agency: Defra Type of measure: Other departments or agencies: Contact for enquiries: [email protected] Summary: Intervention and Options RPC OPINION: GREEN Cost of Preferred (or more likely) Option 3(2019 prices, 2020 present value) Total Net Business Net Net cost to business One-In, Business Impact Target Status Present Present Value per year () Three-Out Value £275.4m -£9,532.5m £1,131.0m In scope Qualifying provision What is the problem under consideration? Why is government intervention necessary? A producer responsibility (PR) system for packaging has been in place since 1997. Over this time, it has helped businesses across the UK to meet their packaging waste recycling obligations and the UK to achieve its and the EU packaging waste recycling targets whilst keeping the cost of compliance to businesses low compared to EU Member States. As the current system is designed to enable producers to meet (not exceed) their recycling targets it provides little incentive for producers to design their packaging to be more recyclable or encourage the use of reusable or refillable packaging. In addition, a range of environmental externalities (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions and disamenity impacts from littering) are not fully accounted for in packaging producers’ and users’ decisions. Other issues of the current system include stakeholders’ concerns over system transparency; limited direct financial support for local authorities (LAs) managing packaging waste and that recycling that can be done at a lower cost overseas resulting in a lack of a level playing field for domestic reprocessors.
  • Good Practice Performance Measures for Kerbside Recycling Systems

    Good Practice Performance Measures for Kerbside Recycling Systems

    Getting more from our recycling systems Good practice performance measures for kerbside recycling systems recycling systems Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Published by Sustainability Programs Division Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Level 2, 1 Fitzwilliam Street, Parramatta NSW 2150 PO Box 644, Parramatta NSW 2124 Phone: 02 8837 6000 Fax: 02 8837 6099 This publication was commissioned as a joint project by the NSW Government and Industry under the National Packaging Covenant. Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the contents of this document are free from factual error. However, the Department shall not be liable for any damage or loss, which may occur in relation to any person taking action or not on the basis of this document. Acknowledgement The Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) and the NSW Jurisdictional Recycling Group wish to thank the following Councils for their participation in the research project: Ashfield, Auburn, Bankstown, Baulkham Hills, Blacktown, Botany Bay, Camden, Canterbury, Canada Bay (Drummoyne), Fairfield, Hornsby, Hurstville, Kogarah, Ku-ring-gai, Leichhardt, Liverpool, Manly, Marrickville, Parramatta, Penrith, Pittwater, Rockdale, Ryde, Sutherland, Warringah, Woollahra. ISBN: 1 920887 09 1 Copyright © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), February 2004 Contents Acronyms and glossary of terms ............................................................2 1 Introduction.....................................................................................3
  • A Strategic Framework for Working Toward Zero Waste Societies Based on Perceptions Surveys

    A Strategic Framework for Working Toward Zero Waste Societies Based on Perceptions Surveys

    recycling Article A Strategic Framework for Working toward Zero Waste Societies Based on Perceptions Surveys Atiq Uz Zaman School of Built Environment, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, WA 6102, Australia; [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9266-9018 Academic Editor: Alex Godoy-Faundez Received: 4 July 2016; Accepted: 4 January 2017; Published: 9 January 2017 Abstract: The visionary concept of zero waste advocates a systematic process of designing out waste and recovering resources from waste. A strategic zero waste framework (ZWF) is essential for developing and executing systematic waste management activities to achieve the overarching goals. This study identifies the key principles for the development of a strategic ZWF based on a waste experts’ survey analysis. Around 68 experts from different regions responded and provided their views on the key elements of a strategic ZWF though an online questionnaire survey. Eighteen strategic elements of waste prevention, management, treatment and assessment were identified as the key principles of the zero waste framework. As the study followed a generalized approach, it is important to acknowledge that all identified and proposed strategic elements may need to be contextualized based on the local conditions in order to achieve zero waste goals. Based on the findings, the study suggests the following three fundamental strategic action plans that need to be implemented simultaneously for moving towards zero waste societies: (i) sustainable production through a cradle-to-cradle design and product stewardship; (ii) collaborative and responsible consumption of natural resources; and (iii) zero waste management through conservation of resources. In addition, a constant evaluation of progress towards zero waste goals is essential.