United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit The United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit dures for rescue operations.[2] (NEDU or NAVXDIVINGU) is the primary source of diving and hyperbaric operational guidance for the US [1][2][3] Navy. It is located within the Naval Support Ac- 2.2 Washington Navy Yard tivity Panama City in Panama City Beach, Bay County, Florida.[3] NEDU was established in 1927 at the Washington Navy Yard.[1][2] 1 Mission and vision NEDU describes its mission as: “The Navy Experimen- tal Diving Unit tests and evaluates diving, hyperbaric, and other life-support systems and procedures, and con- ducts research and development in biomedical and en- vironmental physiology. NEDU provides technical rec- ommendations based upon knowledge and experience, to Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command to support operational requirements of our armed forces.”[3] The vision for NEDU is stated to be: “The Navy Ex- perimental Diving Unit will be the most credible and re- spected research, development, and test and evaluation center for diving as well as the focal point of leadership for biomedical and bioengineering solutions for undersea military operations.”[3] 2 History A Momsen lung in use during training 2.1 Brooklyn Navy Yard Early developments for the unit involved evaluation and Experimental diving in the US Navy started in 1912 at testing of the Submarine Escape Lung (Momsen lung) the Brooklyn Navy Yard under the leadership of Chief and the McCann Rescue Bell.[2] This work was done by Gunner George D. Stillson.[1] Stillson’s research program Charles Momsen and Allan McCann. In 1929, Momsen ultimately led to increasing diver capabilities from 60 received the Navy Distinguished Service Medal for per- feet (18 m) to over 300 feet (91 m) of depth based sonally testing the device at a depth of 200 feet (61 m). on Haldane’s decompression work with the Royal Navy. Techniques used for the rescue of submariners aboard the This resulted in the first publication of the United States USS Squalus were developed by Momsen and McCann in Navy Diving Manual and established the need for a fa- their time at NEDU.[2][6][7] This work lead to the rescue cility dedicated to research and development of diving and recovery of 33 crewmen.[6] Momsen and McCann procedures.[1][4][5] received a Letter of Commendation from President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt for the Squalus In 1915, Stillson’s team was sent to salvage the F-4 sub- [6] marine. On these deep dives, the divers experienced the effort. debilitating effects of nitrogen narcosis leading them to The first medical staff were introduced to the facil- try the addition of helium to their breathing mix.[2] The ity in the mid-1930s when Charles W Shilling, Albert navy salvage operations then came under the direction of R Behnke, and OE Van der Aue began work. Their Warrant Gunner C. L. Tibbals who led teams through the early work improved the prevention and treatment of salvage of the S-51 in 1925 and S-4 in 1927 further estab- decompression sickness with the inclusion of oxygen lishing the naval need for equipment, training, and proce- rather than air.[1][8][9] 1 2 3 FACILITIES Through World War II, work continued on decompres- biomedical and development group was transferred to sion and oxygen toxicity.[10][11] NEDU.[1][26] Through the 1950s NEDU tested equipment and further In response to the overseas military needs, NEDU fo- refined procedures for divers including the US Navy 1953 cused on warm water diving from 1999 to 2002.[27] This decompression table.[12][13] guidance to the Naval Special Warfare community influ- [1] From 1957 to 1962 was the beginnings of saturation div- ences operational needs on an ongoing basis. ing under the leadership of Captain George F. Bond of NEDU divers were essential to the recovery of artifacts the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory and from the ex-USS Monitor in 2001 and 2002.[1][28] [1][14] the Genesis Project. Genesis D was performed at In 2002, certification of the Mark 16 Mod 1 rebreather NEDU in 1963.[1][15] Bond then went on to head the [16] was completed following improvement of systems in- SEALAB I saturation project in 1964. cluding, extension of the working limit to 300 feet (91 Robert D. Workman published a novel method to m), new decompression tables for both nitrogen-oxygen calculate decompression schedules in 1965 that in- and helium-oxygen diving including new repetitive div- volved estimating the limiting values of excess tissue ing capabilities for helium-oxygen, test of an Emergency supersaturation.[17] Breathing System with communications, the addition of an integrated buoyancy compensation device, and an im- Work continued in deep saturation dives, equipment test- [1][29] ing as well as thermal protection and physiology research proved full face mask. throughout the 1960s and early 1970s. 2.3 Naval Support Activity Panama City In 1975, NEDU relocated to its current location in Panama City, Florida.[1] SEALs using SEAL Delivery Vehicle In 2004, NEDU contributed to operational guidance for diving in harsh contaminated environments.[30] NEDU has continued research into oxygen toxicity uti- lizing the US Navy Mark 16 Mod 1.[31][32] Development of breathing systems, thermal protection, and decompression procedures for SEAL Delivery Ve- hicles and the Advanced SEAL Delivery System is US Navy Diver using Kirby Morgan 37 diving helmet ongoing.[33][34] In 2011, divers completed a 1,000 fsw saturation dive to NEDU tested and evaluated the replacement of Stillson’s evaluate the new Navy’s Saturation Fly-Away Diving Sys- Mark V as the US Navy standard diving dress, the Mark tem (SAT FADS).[35] The SAT FADS was designed in 12 Surface Supplied Diving System, and eventually its re- 2006 as a portable replacement of two decommissioned placement the Mark 21/ Superlight 17 in the 1970s and Pigeon-class submarine rescue vessels.[35] 1980s.[1][18][19] Evaluation and testing of new breathing apparatus and ap- NEDU conducts at least one saturation dive per year. plication of other technologies for diving is key to their These dives were used, amongst other things, to evalu- mission.[36][37] ate decompression and recompression procedures, equip- ment, carbon dioxide absorbents, as well as active and passive thermal protection.[20][21][22] Many of these tests included ongoing evaluations of commercially available diving equipment.[23][24][25] 3 Facilities In 1998, the Naval Medical Research Center’s diving 3.3 Environmental chamber 3 NEDU experimental test pool (4.6 m) by 30 ft (9.1 m) by 15 ft (4.6 m) deep, capable of sustaining temperatures from 34 to 105 °F (1 to 41 °C). It is designed and constructed for manned, shallow wa- ter testing and for supporting workup dives for the Ocean Simulation Facility. The test pool is supported by a fully instrumented medical and engineering deck, from which the safety of both divers and test equipment can be moni- tored. The facility can accommodate a wide range of ex- periments, from biomedical studies of diver thermal and workload conditions to equipment studies of submersible devices. The test pool has a communications suite, full video capability, real-time computerized data acquisition NEDU Ocean Simulation Facility and analysis, and pressure and gas monitoring.[39] The depth is sufficient to allow divers to maintain an oxy- 3.1 Ocean simulation facility gen partial pressure of 1.3 bar on their breathing appara- tus while immersed and riding a bicycle ergometer.[31][32] The Ocean Simulation Facility (OSF) simulates ocean conditions to a maximum pressure equivalent of 2,250 feet (690 m) seawater (fsw) at any salinity level. 3.3 Environmental chamber The chamber complex consists of a 55,000-US-gallon (210,000 L) wet chamber and five interconnected dry liv- ing/working chambers totaling 3,300 cubic feet (93 m3) of space. Wet and dry chamber temperatures can be set from 28 to 104 °F (−2 to 40 °C). Equipped with the lat- est data acquisition capability, the OSF can accommo- date a wide range of complex experiments including diver biomedical studies and testing of humans as well as small submersible vehicles and other machines in the wet cham- ber. Saturation dives can be performed for more than 30 days of continuous exposure in the OSF. For human and equipment testing underwater over extended periods, divers use the dry chambers as comfortable living quar- ters, from which they can make diving excursions into the wet chamber. The dry chambers are also capable of altitude simulation studies to heights of 150,000 feet NEDU environmental chamber (46,000 m).[38] The Environmental Chamber is capable of simulating a broad range of temperatures from 0 to 130 °F (−18 to 54 3.2 Experimental test pool °C), humidity from 5 to 95%, and wind velocity from 0 to 20 mph (0 to 32 km/h). The chamber is instrumented The Experimental Test Pool is a 50,000-US-gallon to conduct physiological studies and to test various types (190,000 L) capacity freshwater tank measuring 15 ft of equipment.[40] 4 4 PERSONNEL 3.4 Experimental diving facility NEDU gas analysis lab 3.6 Gas analysis lab NEDU experimental diving facility The gas analysis laboratory is equipped for the pre- cise analysis of gases, and it is used to evaluate diving- The Experimental Diving Facility (EDF) simulates un- related problems such as offgassing and contaminant con- manned pressure conditions to 1,640 feet (500 m) sea trol. The laboratory’s analytical capabilities include gas water and temperatures can be set from 28 to 110 °F chromatography, mass spectrometry, and infrared spec- (−2 to 43 °C).
Recommended publications
  • A History of Closed Circuit O2 Underwater Breathing Apparatus
    Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) A HISTORY OF CLOSED CIRCUIT OXYGEN UNDEnWATER BRDA'1'HIllG AJ'PARATU'S, by , Dan Quiok Project 1/70 School of Underwater Medicine, H MAS PENGUIN, Naval P.O. Balmoral, IT S W .... 2091. May, 1970 Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword. Page No. 1 Introduction. " 2 General History. " 3 History Il: Types of CCOUBA Used In 11 United Kingdom. " History & Types of CCOUBA Used In 46 Italy. " History & Types o:f CCOUBJl. Used In 54 Germany. " History & Types of CCOUEA Used In 67 Frr>.!1ce. " History·& Types of CeOUM Used In 76 United States of America. " Summary. " 83 References. " 89 Acknowledgements. " 91 Contributor. " 91 Alphabetical Index. " 92 Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) - 1 - FOREWORD I am very pleased to have the opportunity of introducing this history, having been responsible for the British development of the CCOt~ for special operations during World War II and afterwards. This is a unique and comprehensive summary of world wide development in this field. It is probably not realised what a vital part closed circuit breathing apparatus played in World War II. Apart from escapes from damaged and sunken submarines by means of the DSEA, and the special attacks on ships by human torpedoes and X-craft, including the mortal damage to the "Tirpitz", an important part of the invasion forces were the landing craft obstruction clearance units. These were special teams of frogmen in oxygen breathing sets who placed demolition charges on the formidable underwater obstructions along the north coast of France.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Articles
    2 Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Volume 49 No. 1 March 2019 Original articles The impact of diving on hearing: a 10–25 year audit of New Zealand professional divers Chris Sames1, Desmond F Gorman1,2, Simon J Mitchell1,3, Lifeng Zhou4 1 Slark Hyperbaric Unit, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 3 Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland 4 Health Funding and Outcomes, Waitemata and Auckland District Health Boards, Auckland Corresponding author: Chris Sames, Slark Hyperbaric Unit, Waitemata District Health Board, PO Box 32051, Devonport, Auckland 0744, New Zealand [email protected] Key words Audiology; Fitness to dive; Hearing loss; Medicals – diving; Occupational diving; Surveillance Abstract (Sames C, Gorman DF, Mitchell SJ, Zhou L. The impact of diving on hearing: a 10–25 year audit of New Zealand professional divers. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2019 March 31;49(1):2–8. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.1.2-8. PMID: 30856661.) Introduction: Surveillance of professional divers’ hearing is routinely undertaken on an annual basis despite lack of evidence of benefit to the diver. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude and significance of changes in auditory function over a 10−25 year period of occupational diving with the intention of informing future health surveillance policy for professional divers. Methods: All divers with adequate audiological records spanning at least 10 years were identified from the New Zealand occupational diver database. Changes in auditory function over time were compared with internationally accepted normative values. Any significant changes were tested for correlation with diving exposure, smoking history and body mass index.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel D. Miller IV, D.O
    American Osteopathic College of Occupational and Preventive Medicine OMED 2012, San Diego, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 Diving Emergencies The First 24 Hours Samuel D. Miller IV, D.O. Emergency Medicine - Marian Medical Center Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine NAUI #13227L PADI #161841 SSI Pro 5000 Dive Emergencies – the First 24 Divers Alert Network (DAN) 2008 Annual Report Background . .Largely based on 2006 events Descent / Ascent Injuries The first 10-15 Minutes .Project Dive Exploration (PDE) The First 24 Hours .Dive injuries The ER experience .Dive fatalities Hyperbaric Medicine .Breath-hold incidents. Table 1: Occurrence of Sports Injuries for 1996 Source: Accident Facts, 1998Incidence Edition (detailing 1996 data), National ofSafety Council. Nonfatal Diving Injuries Number of Sport Reported Injuries Incident Index Participants Bicycling 71,900,000 566,676 .788 Swimming 60,200,000 93,206 .154 Fishing 45,600,000 76,828 .168 http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org Roller skating 40,600,000 162,307 .399 Golf 23,100,000 36,480 .158 Tennis 11,500,000 23,550 .204 Water skiing 7,400,000 9,854 .133 Scuba 1,000,000 935 .094 Table 1: Occurrence of Sports Injuries for 1996 Source: Accident Facts, 1998 Edition (detailing 1996 data), National Safety Council. P-1 American Osteopathic College of Occupational and Preventive Medicine OMED 2012, San Diego, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 DIVING FATALITIES Diver Physiology Pressure SCUBA Diving .003-.005% Effects of pressure Rock climbing .034% Gas absorption Around 100 SCUBA diving deaths per year What
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Production of Carbon Dioxide in Simulated Sea States: Relevance for Hyperbaric Escape Systems
    Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) UHM 2006, Vol. 33, No. 4 – CO2 production in HES Metabolic production of carbon dioxide in simulated sea states: relevance for hyperbaric escape systems. M. TIPTON, P. NEWTON, T. REILLY Department of Sport & Exercise Science, Institute of Biomedical & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Portsmouth, St Michael’s Building, White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT Submitted 12/15/2005; final copy accepted 3/6/2006 Tipton M, Newton P, Reilly T. Metabolic production of carbon dioxide in simulated sea states: relevance for hyperbaric escape systems. Undersea Hyperb Med 2006; 33(4):291-297. Hyperbaric Escape Systems (HES) are used when saturation diving bells have to be evacuated and divers transported to safety. The aim of the present investigation was to determine the levels of metabolic CO2 production expected from the occupants of an HES in different wave states, and from this, to recommend a reasonable and safe requirement for scrubbing CO2 within an HES. The CO2 production and heart rate of 20 male subjects representing saturation divers were collected while they were seated in an HES seat, fixed to an inflatable rescue vessel. The vessel was tethered in a wave pool and longitudinal (L), perpendicular (P), and calm (C) sea conditions were reproduced. Heart rate did not differ between conditions (P= 0.33) the mean (SD) heart rates (b.min-1) were: C: 71 (8.5); L: 74 (9); P: 75 (9).Carbon dioxide production was significantly higher (P=0.005) with the boat orientated perpendicular to the waves compared to the calm condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygen - Wikipedia
    5/20/2020 Oxygen - Wikipedia Oxygen Oxygen is the chemical element with the symbol O and atomic number 8. It is a member of the chalcogen group in Oxygen, 8O the periodic table, a highly reactive nonmetal, and an oxidizing agent that readily forms oxides with most elements as well as with other compounds. After hydrogen and helium, oxygen is the third-most abundant element in the universe by mass. At standard temperature and pressure, two atoms of the element bind to form dioxygen, a colorless and odorless diatomic gas with the formula O2. Diatomic oxygen gas constitutes 20.95% of the Earth's atmosphere. As compounds including oxides, the element makes up almost half of the Earth's crust.[2] Liquid oxygen boiling Dioxygen provides the energy released in combustion[3] and Oxygen aerobic cellular respiration,[4] and many major classes of Allotropes O2, O3 (ozone) organic molecules in living organisms contain oxygen atoms, such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and fats, as do Appearance gas: colorless the major constituent inorganic compounds of animal shells, liquid and solid: pale teeth, and bone. Most of the mass of living organisms is blue oxygen as a component of water, the major constituent of Standard atomic [15.999 03, 15.999 77] lifeforms. Oxygen is continuously replenished in Earth's weight A (O) conventional: 15.999 atmosphere by photosynthesis, which uses the energy of r, std sunlight to produce oxygen from water and carbon dioxide. Oxygen in the periodic table Oxygen is too chemically reactive to remain a free element in H H – air without being continuously replenished by the LB BCNOFN ↑ SM ASPSCA photosynthetic action of living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004.12 QAR Lab Report
    Queen Anne's Revenge Conservation Laboratory Report, December 2004 UAB Conservation Laboratory, Greenville Sarah Watkins-Kenny, QAR Project Conservator Eric Nordgren, Project Assistant Conservator Wendy Welsh, QAR Laboratory Manager In 2000, the Discovery Channel filmed the former QAR Project Conservator, Wayne Lusardi, breaking down the large concretion, QAR418.000, nicknamed `Baby Ruth'. It was given this name because with all the ballast stones stuck to the outside it reminded archaeologists of the chocolate bar. Baby Ruth yielded many artifacts: two small cannon, C19 and C21, as well as ceramic sherds, rope, pipe fragments, glass, nails, cannon shot, cask hoops, gunflints and an array of other objects. Not all of the Baby Ruth artifacts have been conserved, however, some can be seen at the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM) and others, including C19 and C21, are heading there this spring. Another similar looking concretion (QAR 509.000) was recovered in 2001 but has remained in storage since. Originally nicknamed the Baby Ruth II, this concretion has been renamed to Baby Bertha (so as not to confuse!). Concretion QAR 509.000 will be our feature concretion for the next couple of months. At the beginning of December we began the process of breaking down this concretion, fortunately this time not under the pressure of video cameras. Before removing anything from the concretion it was well documented with digital photographs, scaled drawings and weighed (800lbs). Once initial documentation was complete, the first step was to mechanically remove the top layer of shells to outline the ballast stones and to clarify where the stones end and concretion (which will contain artifacts) begins.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Performance Limits for Divers' Underwater Breathing Gear: Consequences of Adopting Diver-Focused Limits
    Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) Navy experimental Diving Unit TA05-12 321 Bullfinch Rd. NEDU TR 07-02 Panama City, FL 32407·7015 January 2007 COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE LIMITS FOR DIVERS' UNDERWATER BREATHING GEAR: CONSEQUENCES OF ADOPTING DIVER-FOCUSED LIMITS Author: Distribution Statement A: D. E. Warkander, Ph.D. Approved tor public release; distribution I. unlimited. Rubicon Research Repository (http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org) UNCLASSifiED SECURITY CLASSifiCATION Of THIS PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATlON PAGE 1a. REPORT SECURITY CLASSifICATION 1b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS Unclassified 28. SECURITY CLASSifiCATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY Of REPORT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 2b. DECLASSlflCATIONlOOWNGRADING AUTHORITY 4. PERfORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) NEDU Technical Report No. 0J.{l2 6a. NAME Of PERfORMING 6b. OffICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME Of MONITORING ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION (If Applicable) Navy Experimental Diving Unit 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and Zip Code) 321 Bullfinch Road, Panama City, El32407-7015 sa. NAME Of fUNDING SPONSORING ab. OffICE SYMBOl 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTifiCATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If Applicable) NAVSEA N773 8c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZiP Code) 10. SOURCE Of fUNDING NUMBERS 1333lseac Hull Ave SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-0001 PROGRAM PROJECT TASK NO. WORK UNIT ELEMENT NO. NO. ACCESSION TA05-12 NO. 11. TITlE (Include Security Classification) (U) Com . Performance limits for Divers' Underwater Breathina Gear: Conseouences of Adootina Diver-Eocused Umits 12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) D. E. Warkander, Ph.D. 138. TYPE Of REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 14. DATE Of REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 15. PAGE Technical Report fROM June 2005 TO Sept 2006 COUNT January 2007 32 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Diving and DCS in Miskito Indigenous Peoples 1MB (2002) Harvest Management
    http://rubicon-foundation.org UHM 2002, Vol. 29, No. 2 – Miskito Diving Methods Diving methods and decompression sickness incidence of Miskito Indian underwater harvesters RG DUNFORD1, EB MEJIA2, GW SALBADOR2, WA GERTH3, NB HAMPSON1 1Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; 2St. Luke Episcopal Medical Mission, Roatan, Honduras;3U.S. Navy Experimental Diving Unit, Panama City Florida Dunford RG, Mejia EB, Salbador GW, Gerth WA, Hampson NB, Diving methods and decompression sickness incidence of Miskito Indian underwater harvesters. Undersea Hyper Med 2002, 29(2): 74-85. Diving conditions, dive profiles, and symptoms of decompression sickness (DCS) in a group of Miskito Indian underwater seafood harvesters are described. Dive profiles for 5 divers were recorded with dive computers, and DCS symptoms were assessed by neurological examination and interview. Divers averaged 10 dives a day over a 7-day period with a mean depth of 67 + 7 FSW (306 + 123 kPa) and average in-water time of 20.6 + 6.3 minutes. Limb pain was reported on 10 occasions during 35 man-days of diving. Symptoms were typically managed with analgesic medication rather than recompression. Indices of the decompression stress were estimated from the recorded profiles using a probabilistic model. We conclude that the dives were outside the limits of standard air decompression tables and that DCS symptoms were common. The high frequency of limb pain suggests the potential for dysbaric bone necrosis for these divers. dive profile, dive computer, harvester, decompression sickness, Miskito, dysbaric bone necrosis INTRODUCTION The Miskito Indians inhabit the remote La Mosquitia region of the eastern shore of Honduras and the northeastern shore of Nicaragua.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Speleology Journal of the Cave Diving Section of the National Speleological Society
    Underwater Speleology Journal of the Cave Diving Section of the National Speleological Society INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Visit With A Cave: Jug Hole Bringing the Gold Home Expedition: Domincan Republic Winter Workshop at Hart Springs Volume 38 Number 4 October/November/December 2011 Underwater Speleology NSS-CDS Volume 38 Number 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS October/November/December 2011 CHAIRMAN Gene Melton [email protected] contents VICE CHAIRMAN Forrest Wilson Featured Articles 282 Concord Drive Decatur, GA 00 (404) 292-561 [email protected] Bringing the Gold Home TREASURER By Mat Bull .............................................................................................................6 Thomas McMillan III 662 McCutchen St. Expedition: Dominican Republic Charleston, SC 29412-4520 [email protected] By Mark Wenner................................................................................................10 SECRETARY Richard Blackburn Visit With a Cave: Jug Hole [email protected] By James Killion and Richard Dreher..........................................................20 PROGRAM DIRECTOR Frank Ohidy The Buoyancy of a Flooded Dry-Suit, Archimedes 174 SW Meridian Court Law and Dolphins’ Bubbles Ft. White, FL 208 By Doron Nof...................................................................................................... (86) 497-128 25 [email protected] TRAINING CHAIRMAN Bill Dunn [email protected] Columns SOCIAL CHAIRPERSON Riana Treanor From The Chairman By Gene Melton....................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Events, Exhibits, & Educational Programs for the North Carolina
    2017 Events, Exhibits, & Educational Programs for the North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort Media Guide North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort 315 Front Street Beaufort, North Carolina 28461 Tel: 252.728.7317 FINAL: January 1, 2017 Welcome North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort hank you, in advance, for your interest in the North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort. T The North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort reflects coastal life and interprets lighthouses and lifesaving stations, the seafood industry, motorboats, and more. Studies in marine life, science, and ecology are available for all ages. The Beaufort museum is the repository for artifacts from Blackbeard’s wrecked flagship, Queen Anne’s Revenge, among them cannons, grenades, belt buckles and beads. The Harvey W. Smith Watercraft Center teaches boatbuilding for all ages. The North Carolina Maritime Museum in Beaufort is open Monday thru Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Saturday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Sunday 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Free admission to the public. Donations appreciated. The North Carolina Maritime Museums are part of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. In addition to the N.C. Maritime Museum in Beaufort, the other two maritime museums include The Graveyard of the Atlantic Museum in Hatteras and the North Carolina Maritime Museum at Southport. The three North Carolina Maritime Museums preserve and interpret North Carolina’s coastal life and history. They paint a picture of the maritime and coastal culture including fishermen, boat builders, decoy carvers and more. They present exhibits of painters and pirates, shipwrecks and sailboats, and about marine life and protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitor National Marine Sanctuary 2011 Accomplishments
    A Look Ahead th In 2012, Monitor National Marine Sanctuary will celebrate and honor the 150 anniversary of the construction, history, and loss of the USS Monitor. Staff are working closely with genealogists and forensic experts from the U.S. Navy to identify the two crewmen recovered from the Monitor shipwreck in 2002. Additionally, the site is completing a new management plan, scheduled for release in 2013. This plan will guide the sanctuary over the next five years. The site is also working with 2011 ACCOMPLISHMENTS partners to better understand, document and preserve the rich maritime heritage of the coastal waters of North Carolina. SRI International and NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA Monitor National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Members Monitor National Marine Sanctuary was designated the nation’s Officers Citizen-at-Large: Joe Poe Federal Government first national marine sanctuary in 1975. Heritage Tourism: Lauren Hermley The site protects the wreck of the famed Youth (non-voting): c/o Shannon Ricles U.S. Navy: Robert Neyland Chair: Wayne Smith Economic Development: vacant Alternate: Alexis Catsambis Civil War ironclad USS Monitor off Cape Vice Chair: Susan Langley National Park Service: Dave Conlin Hatteras, N.C., best known for its battle Alternate: Doug Stover in 1862 with the Confederate ironclad Non-Governmental Members Governmental Members U.S. Coast Guard: LCDR Kevin Saunders NOAA Monitor NMS (non-voting): David Alberg CSS Virginia at Hampton Roads. In Recreational Diving: Debora Boyce State Government partnership with The Mariners’ Museum Recreational Diving: Jim Bunch Sanctuary Advisory Council Coordinator in Newport News, Va., the sanctuary is Recreational/Commercial Fishing: Jay Kavanagh N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • GNM Silent Killers.Qxd:Layout 1
    “A truly engrossing chronicle.” Clive Cussler JAMES P. DELGADO SILENT KILLERS SUBMARINES AND UNDERWATER WARFARE FOREWORD BY CLIVE CUSSLER © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com SUBMARINES AND UNDERWATER WARFARE JAMES P. DELGADO With a foreword by Clive Cussler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Foreword 6 Author’s Note 7 Introduction: Into the Deep 11 Chapter 1 Beginnings 19 Chapter 2 “Sub Marine Explorers”: Would-be Warriors 31 Chapter 3 Uncivil Warriors 45 Chapter 4 Missing Links 61 Chapter 5 Later 19th Century Submarines 73 Chapter 6 Transition to a New Century 91 Chapter 7 Early 20th Century Submariness 107 Chapter 8 World War I 123 Chapter 9 Submarines Between the Wars 143 Chapter 10 World War II: the Success of the Submarine 161 Chapter 11 Postwar Innovations: the Rise of Atomic Power 189 Chapter 12 The Ultimate Deterrent: the Role of the 207 Submarine in the Modern Era Chapter 13 Memorializing the Submarine 219 Notes 239 Sources & Select Bibliography 248 Index 260 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com FOREWORD rom the beginning of recorded history the inhabitants of the earth have had a Fgreat fascination with what exists under the waters of lakes, rivers, and the vast seas. They also have maintained a great fear of the unknown and very few wished to actually go under the surface. In the not too distant past, they had a morbid fear and were deeply frightened of what they might find. Only three out of one hundred old-time sailors could swim because they had no love of water.
    [Show full text]