DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use and Corridor Report Gemini Solar Project N-84631

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Use and Corridor Report Gemini Solar Project N-84631 Bureau of Land Management Land Use and Corridor Report Gemini Solar Project N-84631 March 2019 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94103 650-373-1200 www.panoramaenv.com BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Gemini Solar Project Land Use and Corridor Report March 2019 Prepared by: Panorama Environmental, Inc. 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94103 650-373-1200 [email protected] 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94103 650-373-1200 www.panoramaenv.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Applicant Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 1-1 Land and Realty ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Data Sources and Methodology .................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Analysis Area ...................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Baseline Description .......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 Potential Effects and Recommendations .................................................................... 2-10 Specially Designated Areas .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Sources and Methodology .................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 Analysis Area ...................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.4 Baseline Description .......................................................................................................... 3-5 3.5 Potential Effects and Recommendations .................................................................... 3-12 Rangeland Resources ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Data Sources and Methodology .................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Analysis Area ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Baseline Description .......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.5 Potential Effects and Recommendations ...................................................................... 4-2 Military and Civilian Aviation ................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Data Sources and Methodology .................................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Analysis Area ...................................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Baseline Description .......................................................................................................... 5-2 5.5 Potential Effects and Recommendations ...................................................................... 5-5 Recreation............................................................................................................................... 6-1 Land Use and Corridor Report ● March 2019 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.1 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Data Sources and Methodology .................................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Analysis Area ...................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.4 Baseline Description .......................................................................................................... 6-2 6.5 Potential Effects and Recommendations ...................................................................... 6-6 References .............................................................................................................................. 7-1 List of Tables Table 1 Land Use Authorizations in the Project Area .......................................................... 2-5 Table 2 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern within 25 Miles of the Project Area .. 3-7 Table 3 Registered Airports within 50 miles of the Project Area......................................... 5-4 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Location Map ................................................................................................ 1-3 Figure 2 Applicant Proposed Action and Additional Surveyed Development Areas .................................................................................. 1-4 Figure 3 Land Use Authorizations in the Project Area .......................................................... 2-7 Figure 4 Corridors in the Project Area..................................................................................... 2-8 Figure 5 Specially Designated Areas within 25 miles of the Project Area......................... 3-6 Figure 6 Registered Airports and Airspace Restrictions within 50 miles of the Project Area ........................................................................... 5-3 Figure 7 Recreation Management Areas within 25 miles of the Project Area................. 6-3 Figure 8 Recreation Features and Access in the Project Area........................................... 6-5 Land Use and Corridor Report ● March 2019 ii ACRONYMS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACEC Area of Critical Environmental Concern AFB Air Force Base AGL above ground level AIS Aeronautical Information Services BLM Bureau of Land Management BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BSBCB Bitter Springs Back Country Byway CAD computer‐aided design CFR Code of Federal Regulations COC Corridor of Concern DoD United States Department of Defense DEM digital elevation model DOE Department of Energy EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPD Environmental Planning Development ERMA extensive recreation management area ESA Environmental Site Assessment Esri Environmental Systems Research Institute FAA Federal Aviation Administration FHWA Federal Highway Administration FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act Land Use and Corridor Report ● March 2019 iii ACRONYMS gen‐tie Generation tie lines GDB geodatabase GIS Geographic Information Systems I‐15 Interstate 15 IOPs Interagency Operating Procedures kV kilovolt LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power MOU Memorandum of Understanding MS Manual Transmittal Sheet MTR Military Training Routes MW Megawatt MWac Megawatt alternating current NAIP National Agriculture Imagery Program NDOT Nevada Department of Transportation NDOW Nevada Department of Wildlife NED National Elevation Dataset NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NGTOC National Geospatial Technical Operations Center NPS National Parks Service NTD National Transportation Dataset O&M Operations and maintenance OHV off‐highway vehicle OSNHT Old Spanish National Historic Trail PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement POD Plan of Development Project Gemini Solar Project Land Use and Corridor Report ● March 2019 iv ACRONYMS PV Photovoltaic RMP Resource Management Plan ROD Record of Decision ROW right‐of‐way SEZ Solar Energy Zone SR State Route SRMA special recreation management area SRP special recreation permit SRTM Shuttle Radar Topography Mission SUAs Special Use Airspaces USC United States Code USDA United States Department of Agriculture USDOI United States Department of Interior USDOT United States Department of Transportation USFS United States Forest Service USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey WEC West‐wide Energy Corridor WMA Wildlife Management Area Land Use and Corridor Report ● March 2019 v 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE This Land Use and Corridor Report has been prepared for the proposed Gemini Solar Project (Project). The purpose of this report is to identify land uses in the Project area that could be adversely affected by the Project and to provide recommendations to minimize effects. This report supports and augments the information provided in the Land Use and Recreation sections of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nevada Rides Produced by Nevada Magazine
    $100 motorcycle guide NEVADA RIDES PRODUCED BY NEVADA MAGAZINE motorcycle guide N EV A D A RIDES CONTENTS Introduction 3 Motorcycling in Nevada Southern Rides 5 Las Vegas, Red Rock Canyon, Valley of Fire State Park, Mt. Charleston, Crystal- Pahrump Loop, Goodsprings, Laughlin CONTACTS Produced by Western Rides NEVADA MAGAZINE 11 Lake Tahoe & Genoa Loop, 401 North Carson Street Paradise Valley Carson City, NV 89701 775-687-5416 Central Ride nevadamagazine.com 16 US Highway 50, Carroll Advertising Opportunities Summit Variation Nevada Magazine 775-687-5416 Northern Rides Events Calendar 19 Elko Area: Jiggs, Nevada Magazine Lamoille Canyon, 775-687-5416 Secret Pass, Angel Lake Eastern Ride Photos courtesy of 23 Lincoln County Dave Bassett, Jerry David, Jeff Dow, Robert Filla, Dan Parker, Larry Prosor, The Rules Jeff Ross, Noel Sheckells 25 Helmet Laws Bike Events 26 Nevada’s Bike Rallies 1 NEVADAMAGAZINE.COM OREGON To Boise IDAHO To Twin Falls Jackpot Denio McDermitt Owyhee Jarbidge 95 Mountain City 93 140 Orovada Paradise Valley 290 Wells 80 Winnemucca 789 225 231 447 229 Elko West Lamoille Wendover To Salt Lake City Gerlach Battle Mountain 80 227 Empire Carlin 228 93 ALT 93 Pyramid 305 Lake Lovelock 278 CALIFORNIA 80 93 446 Nixon 445 Wadsworth Verdi Reno Fallon Austin Eureka To Sacramento Sparks Fernley A Washoe RIC McGill 431 Virginia AME Valley AD IN City Silver RO 50 UTAH TH ST Crystal Bay 341 Springs 50 E LONELIE Ely 28 722 Incline Dayton ALT Village 95 95 361 89 Carson City Lake Tahoe Minden Schurz 844 Baker Stateline Gardnerville Gabbs 50 Genoa Yerington Round Mountain To Sacramento 395 Smith Valley Walker 377 Belmont Lund Wellington Lake To Yosemite N.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor Plan
    - 15 landscape and aesthetics corridor plan I-15 FROM PRIMM TO MESQUITE CORRIDOR PLAN DESIGN WORKSHOP MacKay & Somps JW Zunino & Assoc. CH2MHill Jones & Jones August 3, 2005 1-15 corridor plan Endorsement MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR OF NEVADA MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR KENNY C. GUINN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JEFFREY FONTAINE, P.E. On June 30, 2002, the Nevada Department of Transportation adopted It is NDOT's responsibility to ensure that landscaping and aesthetics as policy, "Pattern and Palette of Place: A Landscape and Aesthetics are an important consideration in building and retrofitting our high- Master Plan for the Nevada State Highway System". Now, the second way system. This Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor Plan for I-15 in phase of planning is complete. This I-15 Landscape and Aesthetics Northern Nevada helps realize our vision for the future appearance of Corridor Plan represents a major step forward for the Landscape and our highways. The plan will provide the guidance for our own design Aesthetics program created by the Master Plan. It is significant teams as well as help Nevada's citizens play an important role in the because it involves local public agencies and citizens in the planning context-sensitive solutions for today's transportation needs. process so that Nevada's highways truly represent the State and its Together, we will ensure our highways reflect Nevada's distinctive people. The Corridor Plan will be the primary management tool used heritage, landscape, and culture. to guide funding allocations, promotes appropriate aesthetic design, and provides for the incorporation of highway elements that unique- ly express Nevada's landscape, communities, and cities, as well as its people.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Situ Autumn 2006
    In-Situ Newsletter of the Nevada Archaeological Association Vol. 10, No. 3 Autumn 2006 PRESIDENTS CORNER. Greg Seymour, NAA President Presidents Corner Our summer board meeting was a blast! It Las Vegas, Nevada. The meeting will be was held at Great Basin National Park. That held after the sessions at 5:30 PM, weekend we visited Lehman Caves and the Thursday, October 19 the first evening of cool meadows of the park at 10,000 feet the conference. All members are welcome. above sea level. The cave is a live cave that The SHPO Regional Site Stewardship is still forming. It has a long history Coordination Meeting will be held at 1:00 including work by the Civilian Conservation PM on October 19th in the conference room Corps and the Hollywood movie industry. of the Nevada State Museum and Historical Most of us went on the 1½ hour tour. How Society in Lorenzi Park. cool! If any one would like to volunteer to sit at A group of us, board members, members, the NAA table on Friday or Saturday at the and family, camped in the park campground Great Basin Conference, please let me know during the weekend. We could hear the at (702) 239-5230. Eva or I will be there as stream all night and the Stars! One night, much as possible but we would like some Dave Valentine cooked a spectacular dinner company! You can help us sell some of the using five Dutch ovens! He cooked a 3 Corners journals and talk about chicken dish, vegetables, and even a fruit archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini Solar Project Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft EIS: Volume 2
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management DOI ------BLM NV S010 2018 0051 EIS GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2: Appendices A - J i The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. The BLM’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. CONTENTS Appendices Appendix A. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Appendix B. Glossary Appendix C. Index Appendix D. Figures Appendix E. Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Plans Appendix F. Cultural Resources Support Information Appendix G Best Management Practices Appendix H. Mitigation, Monitoring, Reporting Measures Appendix I. References Appendix J. Preparers Contents-i This page is intentionally left blank. Contents-ii APPENDIX A List of Acronyms and Abbreviations GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT DRAFT EIS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations List of Acronyms and Abbreviations AC alternating current ACEC Areas of Critical Environmental Concern AFB Air Force Base AGL above ground level APE area of potential effect APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee Applicant Solar Partners, XI, LLC AQ Air Quality BBCS Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP Best Management Practices BSBCB Bitter Springs Back Country Byway CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs cubic feet per second CH4 methane CHU critical habitat units cKOPs candidate key observation points cms cubic meter per second CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e units of equivalent carbon dioxide COC Corridor of Concern CPV concentrated photovoltaic CR Cultural Resources CRMMP Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan i GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT DRAFT EIS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations dBA A-weighted decibel scale DC Direct current DoD Department of Defense DOI Department of the Interior DWMA Desert Wildlife Management Areas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Fun Indoors! Outdoors!
    2016 Special Bonus Issue Full house! Four generations under one roof KIDS AT Summer The bucks PLAY fun indoors! stop here Ten-year-olds Outdoors! saving ... for a house?! Everywhere in between! Summer yummin' Cool recipes for little foodies The Dawson Difference At The Alexander Dawson School, we can’t predict the future, but we can teach children how to shape it. Stellar academic programs, an emphasis Dawson gave me the room to be As a Dawson student I developed a solid Whether it’s delivering a presentation on holistic education, and adaptability to creative. For example, I wrote my foundation in writing, study skills, and or taking a test, there isn’t a single student interests make Dawson a fantastic first play in the eighth grade. It was problem solving. While it has been over identifiable thing that has been more place to learn, explore, and grow. Dawson’s a western melodrama we performed 15 years since I first attended Dawson, I beneficial to me than my educational decision to be the first middle school in for the entire School. People thought still rely on those basic foundational skills experience at Dawson. I was Las Vegas to offer Mandarin allowed me it was funny and I loved that reaction. to guide me through the challenges of encouraged to be an independent to establish a strong lingual foundation I Dawson’s performing arts teacher my Ph.D. program at Wake Forest thinker and I still use the tools I was continued to build through high school told me to take that feeling and try University Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Road Conditions and Signs 2008-2010 for Clark County, Nevada and the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
    Monitoring of Road Conditions and Signs 2008-2010 for Clark County, Nevada and the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Agency Organization: National Park Service- Lake Mead National Recreation Area Project Number: 2005-NPS-529-P Project Contact and Information: Alice C Newton, Vegetation Management Specialist. Lake Mead National Recreation Area 601 Nevada Way Boulder City, NV 89005 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Description of the Project ............................................................................................. 4 Background and Need for the Project .......................................................................... 4 Goals and Objectives of the Project ............................................................................. 5 Methods and Materials .................................................................................................... 7 Evaluation/Discussion of Results .................................................................................. 17 Figure 1. Map of Boulder City Region’s Disturbances and Approved Roads ............ 18 Figure 2. Map of Callville Bay Region’s Disturbances and Approved Roads ............ 27 Figure 3. Map of Cottonwood Cove (Nelson Area) Region’s
    [Show full text]
  • RECORD of DECISION Gemini Solar Project
    RECORD OF DECISION Gemini Solar Project Case File Number: N-84631 DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2018-0051-EIS May 2020 Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 GEMIN1 SOLAR PROJECT RECORD OF DECISION Executive Summary This document constitutes the Record of Decision (ROD) of the United States Department of the Interior (DOI), regarding the Solar Partners XI, LLC's (Applicant) application fora right-of-way (ROW) grant for the Gemini Solar Project (Project) and the associated amendment to the Las Vegas Resource Management Plan of 1998, as amended (1998 Las Vegas RMP). This decision is supportedby the analysis included in the Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment (RM.PA) andFinal Environmental lmpact Statement (FBlS) for Ulis project that was published on December 27, 2019. This ROD makes two decisions: • First, it approves the issuance of a Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) Title V ROW grant to the Applicant to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission a solar facility analyzed in the Proposed RMPA/Final EIS as the Hybrid Alternative. • Second, it amends the Visual Resource Management (VRM) Class 111 objective in the 1998 Las Vegas RMP to a VRM Class TV objective, to allow for management activities that require major modifications of existing landscape character. This decision reflects careful consideration of the Proposed Action, the various alternatives, and the issues identified in the Propo$ed RMPA/Final EIS. This decision best fulfillsthe BLM' s and DOJ's stallllory mission and responsibilities. Introduction The Applicant amended an existing ROW grant application with the BLM to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission the Project on July 21, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Flooding, Clark County, Nevada 1905-1975
    FLOOD HAZBRD ANALYSES Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries Clark County, Nevada SPECIAL REPORT History of Flooding, Clark County, .Nevada 1905-1975 Prepared By td States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service In Cooperation With Clark County Conservation District, City and County Entities of Clark County,Nevada, and Nevada Division of Water Resources August 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service Reno, Nevada FLOOD HAZARD ANALYSES Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries Clark County, Nevada SPECIAL REPORT History of Flooding, Clark County, Nevada 1905-75 Prepared in Cooperation With Clark County Conservation District Clark County Public Works Department City of Las Vegas Public Works Department City of North Las Vegas Public Works Department Nevada Division of Water Resources August 197 7 - Clark Countv Conservation Di tee Lane, Las Vegas, Nevada 89104 Board of Supervisors KARL F. WEIKEL, Chairman ABE TEERLINK, Vice Chairman TED GI LCREASE, Secretary-Treasurer ARNOLD COTTAM, Member KlYOSHl YAMASHITA, Member ROBERT BROADBENT, County Commission, Member Raymond Anderson, Associate Member Dear Friends, The Clark County Conservation District joins other local governmental entities in sponsoring this Special Report, History of Flooding, Clark County, Nevada. This report was prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, as a part of the Las Vegas Wash Flood Hazard Analyses. The District feels that this information should be made available to the public, so that present and future residents of Clark County may become more informed on flood hazards that exist in the County. We believe that public concern for poten- tial flood hazards will be strengthened as a result of having documented flood histories available, Sincerely, Clark County Conservation District Karl F.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini Solar Project Transportation and Traffic Technical Report
    * GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT Bureau of Land Management Transportation and Traffic Technical Report N-84631 Prepared For: Panorama Environmental 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94103 Prepared By: 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200 Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 794-1180 Contact: Meghan Macias, TE [email protected] Prepared March 2019 Revised December 2019 Gemini Solar Project Transportation and Traffic Technical Report Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................. iii 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Applicant Proposed Action ..................................................................................................... 1 2 REGULATORY BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 4 2.1 Federal ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49 .................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Executive Order 11644 ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:12-Cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 34
    Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 34 ATTACHMENT H TO DECLARATION BY ALICE C. NEWTON United States v. Bundy, No. 2:12-cv-804-LDG-GWF Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 2 of 34 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. H - Page 1 of 1 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 3 of 34 ATTACHMENT I TO DECLARATION BY ALICE C. NEWTON United States v. Bundy, No. 2:12-cv-804-LDG-GWF Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 4 of 34 1 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. I - Page 1 of 6 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 5 of 34 2 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. I - Page 2 of 6 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 6 of 34 Photo #1118 near Stewarts Point. 3 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. I - Page 3 of 6 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 7 of 34 Photo#1119 near Stewarts Point. 4 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. I - Page 4 of 6 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 8 of 34 Photo # 1121 near Salt Cove. 5 Ex. 6 - Newton Dec. Att. I - Page 5 of 6 Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 20-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 9 of 34 Photo #1122 near Ann Margaret Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini Solar Project Final RMPA And
    APPENDIX F Cultural Resources Support Information GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT FINAL RMPA/EIS Cultural Resources Support Information Cultural Resources Support Information Prehistory Overview Researchers have created cultural sequences over the years with many being developed as units of time based upon assumptions about cultural development and lifeways. The useful construction of temporal units does not necessarily correspond to the actual cultural developments, and furthermore, should not be considered an expression of cultural homogeneity in any region. Warren and Crabtree express that these time periods do not denote a cultural uniformity in time or space but are noteworthy in their temporal and spatial distinctions, even when these distinctions cannot be described (Warren and Crabtree 1986). Cultural overviews restate and synthesize these chronologies, and these overviews sometimes contribute to confusion by adding terminology to already existing sequences (Warren and Crabtree 1986) Reassessments have been made recently of New World prehistory, including the Great Basin. One of the most noteworthy is the general acceptance of pre-Clovis humans in the New World. Some of the general temporal periods used by archaeologists have been adjusted based upon some of the new lines of evidence. There is an on-going discussion about the length and name of some of these previously defined archaeological periods. The timeline presented in Table 1 is constructed upon more standardized time periods for southern Nevada as outlined in A Prehistoric Context for Southern Nevada (HRA, Inc., Conservation Archaeology, and Gnomon, Inc. 2012). Additional information has been added to summarize some of the diagnostic artifacts for the time periods along with the broad periods of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley of Fire State Park
    Valley of Fire State Park HISTORY FACILITIES Post Office Box 515 Valley of Fire Valley of Fire derives its name from red sandstone VISITOR INFORMATION: The visitor center provides 29450 Valley of Fire Road formations, formed from great shifting sand dunes during exhibits on the geology, ecology, prehistory, and history the age of dinosaurs, 150 million years ago. Complex of the park and the nearby region. Postcards, books, and Overton, Nevada 89040 State Park uplifting and faulting of the region, followed by extensive souvenirs are on sale for your convenience. It is highly [email protected] · (702) 397–2088 erosion, have created the present landscape. recommended that you make this one of your first stops. www.facebook.com/valley.of.fire Other important rock formations include limestone, The visitor center is open daily, year-round from 8:30 am to shale, and conglomerates. Prehistoric users of Valley of Fire 4:30 pm. The park is open daily from sunrise to sunset. included the Basket Maker people and later the Anasazi DAILY-USE FEE: A daily-use (entrance) fee is charged per Pueblo farmers from the nearby fertile Moapa Valley. vehicle upon entering the park. This fee is collected at the The span of approximate occupation has been dated fee booth, visitor center, or at self-pay stations. from 300 B.C.E. to 1150 C.E. Their visits probably involved CAMPING: Additional fees are charged for the use of hunting, food gathering, and religious ceremonies, although camping areas and are payable at the campgrounds. scarcity of water would have limited the length of their stay.
    [Show full text]