Rx :3 X /Week Laam Alternative to Methadone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rx :3 X /Week Laam Alternative to Methadone monograph series 8 RX :3x/WEEK LAAM ALTERNATIVE TO METHADONE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE • PUBLIC HEALTH SERVlCE • ALCOHOL, DRUG ABUSE, AND MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PX : 3 X /WEEK LAAM ALTERNATIVE TO METHADONE EDITORS JACK D. BLAINE, M.D. PIERRE F. RENAULT, M.D. NIDA Research Monograph 8 The NIDA Research Monograph series is prepared by the Division of Research of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Its primary objective is to provide critical reviews of research problem areas and techniques, the content of state-of-the-art conferences, integrative research reviews and significant original research. Its dual publication emphasis is rapid and targeted dissemination to the scientific and professional community. EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Avram Goldstein, M.D. Addiction Research Foundation Palo Alto, California Jerome Jaffe, M.D. College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University. New York Reese T. Jones, M.D. Langly Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute Unversity of California San Francisco, California William McGlothlin, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, UCLA Los Angeles, California Jack Mendelson, M.D. Alchohol and Drug abuse Research Center Havard Medical School McLean Hospital Belmont, Massachusettts Helen Nowlis, Ph.D. Office of Drug Education, DHEW Washington, D.C. Lee Robins, Ph.D. Walhington University School, of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri NIDA RESEARCH MONOGRAPH series Robert DuPont, M.D. DIRECTOR, NIDA William Pollin, M.D. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF RESEARCH, NIDA Robert C. Petersen, Ph.D. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Eunice L. Corfman, M.A. EDITOR Rx :3 x/WEEK LAAM ALTERNATIVE TO METHADONE EDITORS JACK D. BLAINE, M.D. PIERRE F. RENAULT, M.D. Division of Research National Institute on Drug Abuse July 1976 NIDA Reseach Monograph 8 THE NATlONAL INSTlTUTE ON DRUG ABUSE 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville. Maryland 20857 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service DHEW Publication No. (ADM)78-347 Formerly DHEW Publication No. (ADM)76-347 Printed 1976 Reprinted 1977 Library of Congress catalog number 76-20257 For sale by the National Technical Information Service Springfield, Va. 22161 Stock order #PB 253 763; Papercopy: $7.25; Microfiche: $3.00 iv FOREWORD This monograph is a biomedical review and assessment of LAAM (Levo-alpha acetylmethadol), a new treatment drug for heroin addiction now undergoing large scale clinical trials, following several years' intensive research and development under the auspices of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and its pre- decessor, the Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention (SAODAP). LAAM was developed as an alternative to methadone. Over 800 methadone-related deaths per year are being reported by the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) from 24 major cities across the country. Moreover, heroin use has been increasing nationally since mid- 1973 and 15 percent of heroin-related deaths (from 1,440 in 1973 to over 2,000 in 1975) reported by DAWN also involve methadone. Many of these deaths are directly attributable to illicit methadone diversion from drug treatment pro- grams to street sale. Because methadone patients must take their dose daily while simultaneously try- ing to stabilize their work, school, training, family and personal lives, they have been allowed take-home doses to reduce the number of clinic visits they must make. But this practice has made methadone widely available, accounting for much illicit diversion and subsequent painful record of methadone overdose deaths. In contrast, LAAM dosage is three times a week, it does not yield a quick high and appears to provide a level, sustained effect. Animal toxicity studies and clinical research experience indicate that LAAM is a safe and effective opiate maintenance drug, under appropriate medical supervision. A wide spectrum of treatments is needed for various degrees of addiction and kinds of dependent persons. But LAAM seems promising for patients who may need opiate stabilization to ease the difficult switch from a drug-hustling street life to a less self- destructive one. LAAM provides one more choice in tailoring treatment to each individual's needs. Robert L. DuPont, M.D. Director National Institute on Drug Abuse v CONTENTS Foreword v Robert L. DuPont, M.D. Introduction 1 Jack Blaine, M.D. and Pierre Renault, M.D. The Chemistry of LAAM 10 Sydney Archer, Ph.D. PRECLINICAL STUDIES Pharmacology of LAAM 15 Sydney Archer, Ph.D. Toxicology of LAAM 29 Ms. Ann Wolven and Sydney Archer, Ph.D. CLINICAL STUDIES Phase I 39 Ralph M. Sollod, M.S., and Marcia G. Goldstein, M.A. Selected Clinical Studies Synopses 52 Sumnary of Veterans Administration Phase II Cooperative Study for LAAM and Methadone 94 Walter Ling, M.D. V. Charles Chamvastra, M.D. Samuel C. Kaim, M.D. C. James Klett, Ph.D. Summary of SAODAP Phase II Cooperative Study of LAAM vs. Methadone 103 Walter Ling, M.D. C. James Klett, Ph.D. Roderic D. Gillis Phase III Clinical Study of Levo-Alpha-Acetylmethadol 109 John A. Whysener, M.D., Ph.D. The Use of LAAM in Treatment 112 James Cooper, M.D. A Clinical Experience with LAAM 115 Avram Goldstein, M.D. A LAAM Bibliography Preclinical 118 Clinical 123 vii INTRODUCTION Jack Blaine, M.D. and Pierre Renault, MD. MEDICAL DETOXIFICATION problems arising from the need to administer the drug intravenously several times daily. For many years heroin addicted individuals were "treated" by abrupt or gradual discon- METHADONE DETOXIFICATION tinuation of heroin, leading to abstinence. Resulting withdrawal symptoms were either During World War II, German chemists at the untreated or treated palliatively with non- I.G. Farbenindustrie developed a synthetic opiate medications including sleeping pills, narcotic analgesic, 6-dimethylamino-4-4-diphen- tranquilizers, analgesics, antidiarrheals, y1-3-heptanone (methadone, dolorphine) as a sub- and/or antispasmodics. The failure of heroin stitute for morphine. After the war, American withdrawal alone as a treatment with the goal investigators (Isbell et al. 1948) found that of long-term continued abstinence has been methadone’s pharmacological pmfile was voluminously documented. similar to that of morphine and demonstrated that methadone could substitute for morphine At best, medically controlled detoxification in morphine-dependent subjects to relieve the has only inmediate and temporary value as a abstinence symptoms after discontinuation of first step in a comprehensive rehabilitation morphine. Furthermore, methadone could pre- program. Thus, regulated detoxification vent the appearance of withdrawal signs and reduces human suffering and frees the indi- symptoms when substituted for morphine in vidual from his compulsive search for and use equipotent doses. So methadone seemed a of the drug, permitting a shift in attention likely candidate to substitute for heroin when to other more constructive pursuits. Long detoxifying heroin addicts. periods of confinement in a hospital, thera- peutic commmity, or prison, even with tradi- Methadone has several advantages over morphine tional psychotherapeutic intervention have not for detoxification of heroin dependent persons. significantly altered subsequent relapse to Methadone is almost as effective orally as heroin abuse for the vast majority of addicts. parenterally, thus avoiding problems of intra- venous dosage. Also, methadone is metabolized Further, efforts at treatment by large scale to inactive substances more slowly than maintenance of heroin addicts on legally morphine. These two factors extend the dura- dispensed heroin appears to be an inadequate tion of action of methadone to 24 hours which treatment approach due to the practical permits once-a-day &sage and smooths the time-effect curve. Thus, an oral daily dose of 1 methadone can be substituted for several treatment experience, approved the New Drug times daily intravenous doses of morphine or Application for methadone maintenance treat- heroin. The dose of methadone can then be ment of heroin or morphine-like drug dependent lowered gradually until it is completely persons and published rules and regulations withdrawn, producing only a mild abstinence in the Federal Register controlling its use. syndrome. METHADONE DISADVANTAGE METHADONE MAINTENANCE While methadone maintenance had been shown In 1965, Dole and Nyswander (1965) extended repeatedly to be the most effective treatment the clinical use of methadone to a medical of opiate addiction available, several maintenance or stablization treatment, used investigators realized in the late sixties with a comprehensive program of rehabilitation. (Jaffe et al. 1970; Blachly 1971) that In a clinical research setting, they demon- significant problems related to the pharma- strated that heroin addicts could be cology of methadone existed. Methadone did "stabilized" for many months on a single daily not suppress the narcotic craving for a full oral dose of methadone (50-150 mg) achieved 24 hours in many addicts. Very large doses of by gradually increasing the dose over a methadone were necessary to provide sustained period of four weeks as tolerance developed relief of abstinence of symptoms for 24 hours to the dose which relieved the abstinence for these patients. These doses often produced syndrome. At the stabilization-maintenance unwanted sedation causing the patient to "nod" dose, the medication appears to relieve for the first several hours after consumption. narcotic “hunger” or craving, induce sufficient tolerance to prevent an abstinence Furthermore, the patient was required to syndrome and block
Recommended publications
  • Minnesota Statutes 1979 Supplement
    MINNESOTA STATUTES 1979 SUPPLEMENT 152.01 PROHIBITED DRUGS CHAPTER 152. PROHIBITED DRUGS Sec. 152.01 Definitions. 152.02 Schedules of controlled substances; admin­ istration of chapter. 152.01 Definitions. [For text of subds 1 to 8, see M.S.1978] Subd. 9. Marijuana. "Marijuana" means all parts of the plant of any species of the genus Cannabis, including all agronomical varieties, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin, but shall not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mix­ ture, or preparation of such mature stalks, except the resin extracted therefrom, fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination. [For text of subds 10 to 17, see M.S.1978] [ 1979 c 157 s 1 ] 152.02 Schedules of controlled substances; administration of chapter. [For text of subd 1, see M.S.1978) Subd. 2. The following items are listed in Schedule I: (1) Any of the following substances, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, unless specifically excepted, whenever the exis­ tence of such isomers, esters, ethers and salts is possible within the specific chemical des­ ignation: Acetylmethadol; Allylprodine; Alphacetylmethadol; Alphameprodine; Alpham- ethadol; Benzethidine; Betacetylmethadol; Betameprodine; Betamethadol; Betaprodine; Clonitazene; Dextromoramide; Dextrorphan; Diampromide; Diethyliambutene; Dime- noxadol; Dimepheptanol; Dimethyliambutene; Dioxaphetyl butyrate; Dipipanone; Ethylmethylthiambutene; Etonitazene; Etoxeridine; Furethidine; Hydroxypethidine; Ke- tobemidone; Levomoramide; Levophenacylmorphan; Morpheridine; Noracymethadol; Norlevorphanol; Normethadone; Norpipanone; Phenadoxone; Phenampromide; Pheno- morphan; Phenoperidine; Piritramide; Proheptazine; Properidine; Racemoramide; Tri­ meperidine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Repeal Criminal Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with Regulation Joseph L
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 18 | Issue 3 Article 10 1990 A Bill to Repeal Criminal Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with Regulation Joseph L. Galiber Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Galiber, Joseph L. (1990) "A Bill to Repeal Criminal Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with Regulation," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 18: Iss. 3, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol18/iss3/10 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Galiber: A Bill to Repeal Criminal Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with R A BILL TO REPEAL CRIMINAL DRUG LAWS: REPLACING PROHIBITION WITH REGULATION Joseph L. Galiber* Conventional wisdom obliges elected officials to beat the narcodrums loudly and incessantly, and to demand increasingly harsh criminal penalties for the sale and use of illegal drugs.' It is reasonable to wonder why I, a senator, would dare submit a bill2 to the New York State Legislature which would regulate all drugs cur- rently proscribed as illegal in precisely the same manner as alcohol.3 The short answer is that the use of the criminal law to control drug use has not, and never will, have anything more than a costly and marginal impact on drug consumption.4 Despite all the public hyperventilation, drug consumption remains a private, consensual * New York State Senator; B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • LAAM in the Treatment of Opiate Addiction: Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 22
    TIP 22: LAAM in the Treatment of Opiate Addiction: Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 22 A43664 Ira J. Marion, M.A. Consensus Panel Chair U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Rockwall II, 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 95-3052 Printed 1995. Disclaimer This publication is part of the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant technical assistance program. All material appearing in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. This publication was written under contract number ADM 270-91-0007 from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Sandra Clunies, M.S., served as the CSAT Government project officer. Robert A. Lubran, M.S., M.P.A., was the Government content advisor. Carolyn Davis, Constance Gartner, Linda Harteker, Lise Markl, Barbara Shapiro, and Deborah Shuman served as writers. The opinions expressed herein are the views of the consensus panel members and do not reflect the official position of CSAT or any other part of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). No official support or endorsement of CSAT or DHHS for these opinions or for particular instruments or software that may be described in this document is intended or should be inferred. The guidelines proffered in this document should not be considered as substitutes for individualized patient care and treatment decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs of Abuseon September Archived 13-10048 No
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION WWW.DEA.GOV 9, 2014 on September archived 13-10048 No. v. Stewart, in U.S. cited Drugs of2011 Abuse EDITION A DEA RESOURCE GUIDE V. Narcotics WHAT ARE NARCOTICS? Also known as “opioids,” the term "narcotic" comes from the Greek word for “stupor” and originally referred to a variety of substances that dulled the senses and relieved pain. Though some people still refer to all drugs as “narcot- ics,” today “narcotic” refers to opium, opium derivatives, and their semi-synthetic substitutes. A more current term for these drugs, with less uncertainty regarding its meaning, is “opioid.” Examples include the illicit drug heroin and pharmaceutical drugs like OxyContin®, Vicodin®, codeine, morphine, methadone and fentanyl. WHAT IS THEIR ORIGIN? The poppy papaver somniferum is the source for all natural opioids, whereas synthetic opioids are made entirely in a lab and include meperidine, fentanyl, and methadone. Semi-synthetic opioids are synthesized from naturally occurring opium products, such as morphine and codeine, and include heroin, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and hydromorphone. Teens can obtain narcotics from friends, family members, medicine cabinets, pharmacies, nursing 2014 homes, hospitals, hospices, doctors, and the Internet. 9, on September archived 13-10048 No. v. Stewart, in U.S. cited What are common street names? Street names for various narcotics/opioids include: ➔ Hillbilly Heroin, Lean or Purple Drank, OC, Ox, Oxy, Oxycotton, Sippin Syrup What are their forms? Narcotics/opioids come in various forms including: ➔ T ablets, capsules, skin patches, powder, chunks in varying colors (from white to shades of brown and black), liquid form for oral use and injection, syrups, suppositories, lollipops How are they abused? ➔ Narcotics/opioids can be swallowed, smoked, sniffed, or injected.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced B.,Byhansen, 16
    LB301 LB301 2021 2021 LEGISLATURE OF NEBRASKA ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH LEGISLATURE FIRST SESSION LEGISLATIVE BILL 301 Introduced by Hansen, B., 16. Read first time January 12, 2021 Committee: Judiciary 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to the Uniform Controlled Substances Act; to 2 amend sections 28-401, 28-405, and 28-416, Revised Statutes 3 Cumulative Supplement, 2020; to redefine terms; to change drug 4 schedules and adopt federal drug provisions; to change a penalty 5 provision; and to repeal the original sections. 6 Be it enacted by the people of the State of Nebraska, -1- LB301 LB301 2021 2021 1 Section 1. Section 28-401, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2 2020, is amended to read: 3 28-401 As used in the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, unless the 4 context otherwise requires: 5 (1) Administer means to directly apply a controlled substance by 6 injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means to the body of a 7 patient or research subject; 8 (2) Agent means an authorized person who acts on behalf of or at the 9 direction of another person but does not include a common or contract 10 carrier, public warehouse keeper, or employee of a carrier or warehouse 11 keeper; 12 (3) Administration means the Drug Enforcement Administration of the 13 United States Department of Justice; 14 (4) Controlled substance means a drug, biological, substance, or 15 immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of section 28-405. 16 Controlled substance does not include distilled spirits, wine, malt 17 beverages, tobacco, hemp, or any nonnarcotic substance if such substance 18 may, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Drug Control Conventions
    ST/CND/1/Add.1/Rev.3 The International Drug Control Conventions Schedules of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol, as at 22 April 2017 UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 ST/CND/1/Add.1/Rev.3 © United Nations, 2017. All rights reserved, worldwide. Schedules of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol, as at 22 April 2017 List of drugs included in Schedule I Acetorphine 3-O-Acetyltetrahydro-7α-(1-hydroxy-1-methylbutyl)- 6,14-endo-ethenooripavine Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl N-[1-(α-Methylphenethyl)-4-piperidyl]acetanilide Acetylfentanyl N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]acetamide Acetylmethadol 3-Acetoxy-6-dimethylamino-4,4-diphenylheptane AH-7921 3,4-dichloro-N-{[1- (dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]methyl}benzamide Alfentanil N-[1-[2-(4-Ethyl-4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1H-tetrazol-1-yl) ethyl]-4-(methoxymethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N- phenylpropanamide Allylprodine 3-Allyl-1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Alphacetylmethadol α-3-Acetoxy-6-dimethylamino-4,4-diphenylheptane Alphameprodine α-3-Ethyl-1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Alphamethadol α-6-Dimethylamino-4,4-diphenyl-3-heptanol alpha-Methylfentanyl N-[1-(α-Methylphenethyl)-4-piperidyl]propionanilide alpha-Methylthiofentanyl N-[1-[1-Methyl-2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidyl] propionanilide Alphaprodine α-l,3-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Anileridine 1-p-Aminophenethyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester Benzethidine 1-(2-Benzyloxyethyl)-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 329 [New] Uniform Controlled Substances Act
    CHAPTER 329 [NEW] UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT Part I. General Provisions Section 329-1 Definitions 329-2 Hawaii advisory commission on drug abuse and controlled substances; number; appointment 329-3 Annual report 329-4 Duties of the commission Part II. Standards and Schedules 329-11 Authority to schedule controlled substances 329-12 Nomenclature 329-13 Schedule I tests 329-14 Schedule I 329-15 Schedule II tests 329-16 Schedule II 329-17 Schedule III Tests 329-18 Schedule III 329-19 Schedule IV tests 329-20 Schedule IV 329-21 Schedule V tests 329-22 Schedule V 329-23 Republishing and distribution of schedules Part III. Regulation of Manufacture, Distribution, Prescription, and Dispensing of Controlled Substances 329-31 Rules 329-31.5 Clinics 329-32 Registration requirements 329-33 Registration 329-34 Revocation and suspension of registration 329-35 Order to show cause 329-36 Records of registrants 329-37 Filing requirements 329-38 Prescriptions 329-39 Labels 329-40 Methadone treatment programs Part IV. Offenses and Penalties 329-41 Prohibited acts B-penalties 329-42 Prohibited acts C-penalties 329-43 Penalties under other laws 329-43.5 Prohibited acts related to drug paraphernalia Amended 0612 1 329-44 Notice of conviction to be sent to licensing board, department of commerce and consumer affairs 329-45 Repealed 329-46 Prohibited acts related to visits to more than one practitioner to obtain controlled substance prescriptions 329-49 Administrative penalties 329-50 Injunctive relief Part V. Enforcement and Administrative Provisions 329-51 Powers of enforcement personnel 329-52 Administrative inspections 329-53 Injunctions 329-54 Cooperative arrangements and confidentiality 329-55 Forfeitures 329-56 Burden of proof; liabilities 329-57 Judicial review 329-58 Education and research 329-59 Controlled substance registration revolving fund; established Part VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Levacetylmethadol
    Leflunomide/Lornoxicam 77 6. Maddison P, et al. Leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: recom- Levomethadone Hydrochloride (rINNM) ⊗ Lithium Salicylate mendations through a process of consensus. Rheumatology (Ox- ford) 2005; 44: 280–6. Correction. ibid.; 569. Hidrocloruro de levometadona; Levometadonhidroklorid; Lev- Lithium Salicylicum; Salicilato de litio. 7. Silverman E, et al. Long-term open-label preliminary study of ometadonhydroklorid; Levometadonihydrokloridi; Levometado- Лития Салицилат the safety and efficacy of leflunomide in patients with polyartic- no hidrochloridas; Lévométhadone, chlorhydrate de; Levometh- C H LiO = 144.1. ular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; adon-hydrochlorid; Levomethadoni hydrochloridum; (−)-Metha- 7 5 3 52: 554–62. CAS — 552-38-5. 8. Silverman E, et al. Leflunomide in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthri- done Hydrochloride. (−)-6-Dimethylamino-4,4-diphenylheptan- tis (JRA) Investigator Group. Leflunomide or methotrexate for 3-one hydrochloride. juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1655–66. Левометадона Гидрохлорид HO Spondyloarthropathies. References to the use of leflunomide C21H27NO,HCl = 345.9. Li+ -O in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis (see Spondyloar- CAS — 125-58-6 (levomethadone); 5967-73-7 (levometh- thropathies, p.13). adone hydrochloride). 1. Cuchacovich M, Soto L. Leflunomide decreases joint erosions O and induces reparative changes in a patient with psoriatic arthri- tis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 942–3. 2. Kaltwasser JP, et al. Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis Study Profile Group. Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of Lithium salicylate is a salicylic acid derivative (see Aspirin, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum p.20) that has been used in rheumatic disorders, but its use cannot 2004; 50: 1939–50.
    [Show full text]
  • NIDA Drug Supply Program Catalog, 25Th Edition
    RESEARCH RESOURCES DRUG SUPPLY PROGRAM CATALOG 25TH EDITION MAY 2016 CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACEUTICS BRANCH DIVISION OF THERAPEUTICS AND MEDICAL CONSEQUENCES NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 6001 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20852 160524 On the cover: CPK rendering of nalfurafine. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction ................................................................................................1 B. NIDA Drug Supply Program (DSP) Ordering Guidelines ..........................3 C. Drug Request Checklist .............................................................................8 D. Sample DEA Order Form 222 ....................................................................9 E. Supply & Analysis of Standard Solutions of Δ9-THC ..............................10 F. Alternate Sources for Peptides ...............................................................11 G. Instructions for Analytical Services .........................................................12 H. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Compounds .............................................13 I. Nicotine Research Cigarettes Drug Supply Program .............................16 J. Ordering Guidelines for Nicotine Research Cigarettes (NRCs)..............18 K. Ordering Guidelines for Marijuana and Marijuana Cigarettes ................21 L. Important Addresses, Telephone & Fax Numbers ..................................24 M. Available Drugs, Compounds, and Dosage Forms ..............................25
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 1: Additional Tables and Figures
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health Supplement 1: Additional tables and figures Box S1: Substances included and excluded from the International Narcotic Control Board (INCB) data on narcotic consumption, in alphabetical order. Opioids included in the opioid consumption calculation: 1. (+)-cis-3-methylfental 35. Bezitramide 2. 3-Acetylmorphine 36. Butyrfentanyl 3. 3-Methylfentanyl 37. Carfentanil 4. 3-Methylthiofentanyl 38. Carfentanyl 5. 3-Monoacetylmorphine 39. Clonitazene 6. 4-Fluoroisobutyrfentanyl 40. Codeine 7. 6-Acetylmorphine 41. Codeine-6GLUC 8. 6-Monoacetylmorphine 42. Codeine-6-glucuronide 9. Acetorphine 43. Codeine-Methyl 10. Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl 44. Codeine-N-oxide 11. Acetyldihydrocodeine 45. Codoxime 12. Acetylfentanyl 46. Conc. of poppy straw (C) ACA 13. Acetylmethadol 47. Conc. of poppy straw (C) AMA 14. Acetylmorphine 48. Conc. of poppy straw (C) AOA 15. Acrylfentanyl 49. Conc. of poppy straw (C) ATA 16. AH-7921 50. Conc. of poppy straw (C) GW 17. Alfentanil 51. Conc. of poppy straw (M) ACA 18. Allylprodine 52. Conc. of poppy straw (M) AMA 19. Alphacetylmethadol 53. Conc. of poppy straw (M) AOA 20. Alphameprodine 54. Conc. of poppy straw (M) ATA 21. Alphamethadol 55. Conc. of poppy straw (M) GW 22. alpha-Methylfentanyl 56. Conc. of poppy straw (N) GW 23. alpha-Methylthiofentanyl 57. Conc. of poppy straw (O) 24. Alphaprodine 58. Conc. of poppy straw (O) ACA 25. Anileridine 59. Conc. of poppy straw (O) AMA 26. Benzethidine 60. Conc. of poppy straw (O) AOA 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) on Functional Outcomes Among Patients with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
    NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Effects of Medication- Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder on Functional Outcomes A Systematic Review Margaret A. Maglione, Laura Raaen, Christine Chen, Gulrez Shah Azhar, Nima Shahidinia, Mimi Shen, Ervant J. Maksabedian Hernandez, Roberta M. Shanman, Susanne Hempel Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2108 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Over the past two decades, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has invested unparalleled resources into developing effective treatments for military-related psychological health conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision of the Government of the Russian Federation No
    DECISION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 681 OF JUNE 30, 1998 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE LIST OF NARCOTIC DRUGS, PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND THEIR PRECURSORS THAT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO CONTROL IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION In accordance with the Federal Law on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1998, No. 2, item 219) the Government of the Russian Federation resolves: To approve the annexed enumeration of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors that shall be subject to control in the Russian Federation. To establish that the amendment of the said enumeration shall be carried out on presentation of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation jointly with the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation Sergey Kirienko Enumeration of Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Their Precursors That Shall Be Subject to Control in the Russian Federation (Approved by the Decision of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 681 of June 30, 1998) List of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Whose Circulation in the Russian Federation Is Prohibited in Accordance with the Legislation of the Russian Federation and the International Treaties of the Russian Federation (List I) List of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Whose Circulation in the Russian Federation Is Restricted and in Whose Respect Control Measures Shall Be Established in Accordance with the Legislation of
    [Show full text]