Great Ape Conservation Fund Summary Report 2001-2007 the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Ape Conservation Fund Summary Report 2001-2007 the U.S U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Great Ape Conservation Fund Summary Report 2001-2007 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s mission: Working with others, to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Cover: “Amahoro”, silverback in Parc National des Volcans, Rwanda. © R.G. Ruggiero/USFWS Above: Sunset in the Likouala-aux-Herbes, Republic of Congo. © R.G. Ruggiero/USFWS 2 Contents Introduction 2 Conservation of Orangutans 4 Conservation of Gibbons 6 Conservation of Bonobos 8 Conservation of Chimpanzees 10 Conservation of Gorillas 12 Funding for the Central African Forest Zone 14 Project Summaries 2007 15 Project Summaries 2006 20 Project Summaries 2005 26 Project Summaries 2004 29 Project Summaries 2003 34 Project Summaries 2002 36 Project Summaries 2001 38 Summary Maps and Graphs 41 3 Female Bornean orangutan 1 Orangutan Foundation International Great Ape Conservation Fund n behalf of the American people, the U.S. Congress passed the Great Ape Conservation Act Oin 2000, which created the Great Ape Conservation Fund for the conservation of gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and gibbons. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service awards grants for activities related to combating infectious diseases, strengthening law enforcement, conservation education, safeguarding habitat and other efforts to support the conservation and management of apes. By their biological nature, apes The destruction of their forest To implement these programs, the are extremely vulnerable and habitat is perhaps the most USFWS works with conservation susceptible to population declines serious threat to great apes. partners within the U.S. and the from human disturbance. They grow As human populations grow, range countries. These collaborators relatively slowly, are long-lived, have there is an increased demand to have vast on the ground experience low reproductive rates and complex convert primary forest for human and are experts on the ecology of social relationships. The Great settlements, agriculture, and timber the species as well as the human Ape Conservation Fund conserves production. dimensions of conservation. gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos in Africa, and orangutans and In Asia, illegal logging, forest fires, This report provides an overview of gibbons in Asia — all of which have conversion of natural forests to conservation efforts supported by suffered significant population exotic plantations, and the draining the Fund between 2001 and 2007, declines due to poaching, disease, of peat lands threaten orangutans illustrates important progress and habitat loss or degradation. in Borneo and Sumatra. In Africa, to date, and highlights the way habitat conversion and poaching forward. Apes are sometimes killed to are aggravated by civil unrest, capture their young for the illegal uncontrolled logging, and the pet trade. They are also poached proliferation of weapons. for bushmeat, the meat of wild animals. Roads built for logging and Efforts to conserve apes are mining operations in both Africa frequently compromised by a lack of and Asia allow poachers easy access awareness and insufficient capacity to previously remote forests that to enforce laws and manage apes once served as protective refuges. and other wildlife. To address this, In some African cultures, ape meat the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is a delicacy that fetches high prices, (USFWS), through the Great Ape particularly in urban areas, and this Conservation Fund, emphasizes creates a strong incentive to hunt a collaborative approach to them over much of their range. conservation. Most grants directly support field work targeting a Recent outbreaks of disease, such range of great ape conservation as Ebola hemorrhagic fever, have programs: building institutional and also decimated ape populations. In human resource capacity, improving some areas of Central Africa, Ebola law enforcement, educating local has killed up to 90% of individuals communities about conservation in several isolated populations of issues, providing economic gorillas. Ebola also poses a serious incentives for conservation, and Juvenile mountain gorilla, Parc human health risk and has been fulfilling the need for robust des Volcans, Rwanda. shown to infect persons who have scientific data on ape species. © R.G. Ruggiero/USFWS handled or consumed ape meat. 2 The name orangutan comes from the Malay words “orang hutan” meaning “forest people”. They are primarily found in lowland rain forest habitats, and prefer fl oodplains, swamps, and adjacent upland habitats. Here they feed upon fruit and supplement their diet with considerable quantities of leaves, bark of select trees, certain fl owers, some insects, honey, and occasional bird’s eggs. They make nests of broken branches, lined with twigs, high up in trees. The number of these nests present in an area may be used to estimate the size of the local orangutan population. 3 Conservation of Orangutans rangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii), are primarily found in lowland rain Oforests, preferring floodplains, swamps, and adjacent upland habitats. They are only found on the islands of Sumatra and Borneo. The wild population of orangutans Kalimantan’s Sebangau Peat including Bornean orangutans. is estimated at 50,000 to 60,000 Swamp hosts the largest extant Biologists are studying how the individuals. This includes 48,860 population of Bornean orangutans orangutans adapt to changes in Bornean orangutans (Pongo (approximately 6,900 or 12.5% of their natural habitat to determine pygmaeus), of which it is estimated the world population). This key whether orangutans can survive in there are 36,500 in Kalimantan population is threatened by loss exploited areas over the long-term. (southern Borneo), 11,000 in Sabah of habitat due to drainage of the The results of this study will be used (northeastern Borneo), and 1,360 in swamp for illegal logging. Drainage to design a management plan for the Sarawak (north and northwestern dries the peat and increases the Kinabatangan orangutan population Borneo), and 7,300 Sumatran likelihood of fire and ultimately and to guide management of wild orangutans (Pongo abelii). the destruction of the habitat. orangutan populations in other In response, the Fund provided multiple-use forests. Orangutans are critically support for the Orangutan Tropical endangered due to habitat loss Peatland Project (Ou-Trop), which In Sumatra, the Fund supported a from logging, peat land drainage, raised the profile of the swamp as series of environmental awareness and a rapid expansion in palm oil an important orangutan habitat road shows for villages associated plantations. In addition, orangutans and helped shape the conservation with oil palm and rubber plantations are killed for meat, medicinal strategy for saving the region’s directly adjacent to the borders purposes, and for entering orangutans. Due to efforts of Gunung Leuser National Park. agricultural fields. Infants are also supported by this project, in 2004 The project communicated crucial taken for the pet trade. Studies have the Indonesian government officially messages about the state of shown that for every baby abducted announced the area as a new Indonesia’s forests and biodiversity, and sold, several other orangutans national park for orangutans. focusing on the Sumatran orangutan die in the process. Since orangutans as a flagship species. The main have a slow reproductive rate In Borneo’s Malaysian state of target audiences were oil palm and (females normally give birth every Sabah, the Fund supported work rubber plantation workers in regions 6-8 years) even low rates of poaching on the Kinabatangan River, Sabah’s where human-orangutan conflict can threaten the existence of large longest river and home to some was either likely to occur, or already orangutan populations. If left of the largest and most diverse documented, due to the proximity of unchecked, these factors will lead to concentrations of wildlife in Borneo, plantations to orangutan habitat. the extinction of the orangutans. In response to these threats, the Great Ape Conservation Fund supports many projects in the range states. In the Indonesian region of Borneo, also known locally as Kalimantan, the Gunung Palung National Park harbors one of the few remaining viable Bornean orangutan populations. Unfortunately, illegal logging has degraded large areas of the park and damaged precious habitat. To bring this destruction to an end, the Fund is supporting the Gunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Project to increase understanding and build pride for the orangutan and the National Park. The Fund has also provided grants for applied research in the park and to establish patrols to protect orangutans and their habitat. Juvenile Bornean orangutan. The Nature Conservancy Left: Illegal logging accounts for 70 percent of the timber leaving Borneo. It is a major threat to survival of the orangutan. © Georgeanne Irvine/Orangutan Foundation International 4 Adult female Hainan gibbon in Bawangling Nature Reserve, Hainan Island, China © Xi Zhinong /Fauna & Flora International 5 Conservation of Gibbons ibbons are small apes that live in the tropical rain forests of Southeast Asia. They are the Gmost diverse of the living apes with four genera comprised of 16 species. They occur from northeast India to Vietnam, north into China, and south through portions of Indonesia. Gibbon species are usually separated by rivers or straits, and typically the ranges of the
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbon Journal Nr
    Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – May 2009 Gibbon Conservation Alliance ii Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – 2009 Impressum Gibbon Journal 5, May 2009 ISSN 1661-707X Publisher: Gibbon Conservation Alliance, Zürich, Switzerland http://www.gibbonconservation.org Editor: Thomas Geissmann, Anthropological Institute, University Zürich-Irchel, Universitätstrasse 190, CH–8057 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Assistants: Natasha Arora and Andrea von Allmen Cover legend Western hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock), adult female, Yangon Zoo, Myanmar, 22 Nov. 2008. Photo: Thomas Geissmann. – Westlicher Hulock (Hoolock hoolock), erwachsenes Weibchen, Yangon Zoo, Myanmar, 22. Nov. 2008. Foto: Thomas Geissmann. ©2009 Gibbon Conservation Alliance, Switzerland, www.gibbonconservation.org Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – 2009 iii GCA Contents / Inhalt Impressum......................................................................................................................................................................... i Instructions for authors................................................................................................................................................... iv Gabriella’s gibbon Simon M. Cutting .................................................................................................................................................1 Hoolock gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma, Myanmar Thomas Geissmann, Mark Grindley, Frank Momberg, Ngwe Lwin, and Saw Moses .....................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Study of Wild Chimpanzee Behavior
    Evolutionary Anthropology 9 ARTICLES Recent Developments in the Study of Wild Chimpanzee Behavior JOHN C. MITANI, DAVID P. WATTS, AND MARTIN N. MULLER Chimpanzees have always been of special interest to anthropologists. As our organization, genetics and behavior, closest living relatives,1–3 they provide the standard against which to assess hunting and meat-eating, inter-group human uniqueness and information regarding the changes that must have oc- relationships, and behavioral endocri- curred during the course of human evolution. Given these circumstances, it is not nology. Our treatment is selective, and surprising that chimpanzees have been studied intensively in the wild. Jane Good- we explicitly avoid comment on inter- all4,5 initiated the first long-term field study of chimpanzee behavior at the Gombe population variation in behavior as it National Park, Tanzania. Her observations of tool manufacture and use, hunting, relates to the question of chimpanzee and meat-eating forever changed the way we define humans. Field research on cultures. Excellent reviews of this chimpanzee behavior by Toshisada Nishida and colleagues6 at the nearby Mahale topic, of central concern to anthropol- Mountains National Park has had an equally significant impact. It was Nishida7,8 ogists, can be found elsewhere.12–14 who first provided a comprehensive picture of the chimpanzee social system, including group structure and dispersal. SOCIAL ORGANIZATION No single issue in the study of wild Two generations of researchers erything about the behavior of these chimpanzee behavior has seen more have followed Goodall and Nishida apes in nature. But this is not the case. debate than the nature of their social into the field.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Sota3 Chapter 7 REV11
    200 Until recently, quantifying rates of tropical forest destruction was challenging and laborious. © Jabruson 2017 (www.jabruson.photoshelter.com) forest quantifying rates of tropical Until recently, Photo: State of the Apes Infrastructure Development and Ape Conservation 201 CHAPTER 7 Mapping Change in Ape Habitats: Forest Status, Loss, Protection and Future Risk Introduction This chapter examines the status of forested habitats used by apes, charismatic species that are almost exclusively forest-dependent. With one exception, the eastern hoolock, all ape species and their subspecies are classi- fied as endangered or critically endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (IUCN, 2016c). Since apes require access to forested or wooded land- scapes, habitat loss represents a major cause of population decline, as does hunting in these settings (Geissmann, 2007; Hickey et al., 2013; Plumptre et al., 2016b; Stokes et al., 2010; Wich et al., 2008). Until recently, quantifying rates of trop- ical forest destruction was challenging and laborious, requiring advanced technical Chapter 7 Status of Apes 202 skills and the analysis of hundreds of satel- for all ape subspecies (Geissmann, 2007; lite images at a time (Gaveau, Wandono Tranquilli et al., 2012; Wich et al., 2008). and Setiabudi, 2007; LaPorte et al., 2007). In addition, the chapter projects future A new platform, Global Forest Watch habitat loss rates for each subspecies and (GFW), has revolutionized the use of satel- uses these results as one measure of threat lite imagery, enabling the first in-depth to their long-term survival. GFW’s new analysis of changes in forest availability in online forest monitoring and alert system, the ranges of 22 great ape and gibbon spe- entitled Global Land Analysis and Dis- cies, totaling 38 subspecies (GFW, 2014; covery (GLAD) alerts, combines cutting- Hansen et al., 2013; IUCN, 2016c; Max Planck edge algorithms, satellite technology and Insti tute, n.d.-b).
    [Show full text]
  • Gorilla Beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26
    Gorilla beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26 Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia ChordataMammaliaPrimatesHominidae Scientific Gorilla beringei Name: Species Matschie, 1903 Authority: Infra- specific See Gorilla beringei ssp. beringei Taxa See Gorilla beringei ssp. graueri Assessed: Common Name(s): English –Eastern Gorilla French –Gorille de l'Est Spanish–Gorilla Oriental TaxonomicMittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B. and Wilson D.E. 2013. Handbook of the Mammals of the World: Volume Source(s): 3 Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. This species appeared in the 1996 Red List as a subspecies of Gorilla gorilla. Since 2001, the Eastern Taxonomic Gorilla has been considered a separate species (Gorilla beringei) with two subspecies: Grauer’s Gorilla Notes: (Gorilla beringei graueri) and the Mountain Gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) following Groves (2001). Assessment Information [top] Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered A4bcd ver 3.1 Year Published: 2016 Date Assessed: 2016-04-01 Assessor(s): Plumptre, A., Robbins, M. & Williamson, E.A. Reviewer(s): Mittermeier, R.A. & Rylands, A.B. Contributor(s): Butynski, T.M. & Gray, M. Justification: Eastern Gorillas (Gorilla beringei) live in the mountainous forests of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, northwest Rwanda and southwest Uganda. This region was the epicentre of Africa's "world war", to which Gorillas have also fallen victim. The Mountain Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei beringei), has been listed as Critically Endangered since 1996. Although a drastic reduction of the Grauer’s Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei graueri), has long been suspected, quantitative evidence of the decline has been lacking (Robbins and Williamson 2008). During the past 20 years, Grauer’s Gorillas have been severely affected by human activities, most notably poaching for bushmeat associated with artisanal mining camps and for commercial trade (Plumptre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees
    ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR VOL. 35 Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees MARTIN N. MULLER* and JOHN C. MITANIt *DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BOSTON UNIVERSITY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, 02215, USA tDEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN, 48109, USA 1. INTRODUCTION The twin themes of competition and cooperation have been the focus of many studies in animal behavior (Alcock, 2001; Dugatkin, 2004; Krebs and Davies, 1997). Competition receives prominent attention because it forms the basis for the unifying, organizing principle of biology. Darwin's (1859) theory of natural selection furnishes a powerful framework to understand the origin and maintenance of organic and behavioral diversity. Because the process of natural selection depends on reproductive competition, aggression, dominance, and competition for mates serve as important foci of ethological research. In contrast, cooperation in animals is less easily explained within a Darwinian framework. Why do animals cooperate and behave in ways that benefit others? Supplements to the theory of natural selection in the form of kin selection, reciprocal altruism, and mutualism provide mechanisms that transform the study of cooperative behavior in animals into a mode of inquiry compatible with our current understand- ing of the evolutionary process (Clutton-Brock, 2002; Hamilton, 1964; Trivers, 1971). If cooperation can be analyzed via natural selection operating on indivi- duals, a new way to conceptualize the process emerges. Instead of viewing cooperation as distinct from competition, it becomes productive to regard them together. Students of animal behavior have long recognized that an artificial dichotomy may exist insofar as animals frequently cooperate to compete with conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Subspecies and Parentage Relationship by Means of DNA Fingerprinting in Two Exemplary of Pan Troglodytes (Blumenbach, 1775) (Mammalia Hominidae)
    Biodiversity Journal , 2018, 9 (2): 107–114 DOI: 10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2018.9.2.107.114 Identification of subspecies and parentage relationship by means of DNA fingerprinting in two exemplary of Pan troglodytes (Blumenbach, 1775) (Mammalia Hominidae) Viviana Giangreco 1, Claudio Provito 1, Luca Sineo 2, Tiziana Lupo 1, Floriana Bonanno 1 & Stefano Reale 1* 1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “A. Mirri”, Via G. Marinuzzi 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy 2Biologia animale e Antropologia, Dip. STEBICEF, Via Archirafi 18, 90123 Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Four chimpanzee subspecies (Mammalia Hominidae) are commonly recognised: the West - ern Chimpanzee, P. troglodytes verus (Schwarz, 1934), the Nigeria-Cameroon Chim - panzee, P. troglodytes ellioti, the Central Chimpanzee, P. troglodytes troglodytes (Blumenbach, 1799), and the Eastern Chimpanzee, P. troglodytes schweinfurthii (Giglioli, 1872). Recent studies on mitochondrial DNA show the incorporation of P. troglodytes schweinfurthii in P. troglodytes troglodytes , suggesting the existence of only two sub - species: P. troglodytes troglodytes in Central and Eastern Africa and P. troglodytes verus- P. troglodytes ellioti in West Africa. The aim of the present study is twofold: first, to identify the correct subspecies of two chimpanzee samples collected in a Biopark structure in Carini (Sicily, Italy), and second, to verify whether there was a kinship relationship be - tween the two samples through techniques such as DNA barcoding and microsatellite analysis. DNA was extracted from apes’ buccal swabs, the cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene was amplified using universal primers, then purified and injected into capillary electrophoresis Genetic Analyzer ABI 3130 for sequencing. The sequence was searched on the NCBI Blast database.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbon Classification : the Issue of Species and Subspecies
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1988 Gibbon classification : the issue of species and subspecies Erin Lee Osterud Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Osterud, Erin Lee, "Gibbon classification : the issue of species and subspecies" (1988). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3925. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Erin Lee Osterud for the Master of Arts in Anthropology presented July 18, 1988. Title: Gibbon Classification: The Issue of Species and Subspecies. APPROVED BY MEM~ OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Marc R. Feldesman, Chairman Gibbon classification at the species and subspecies levels has been hotly debated for the last 200 years. This thesis explores the reasons for this debate. Authorities agree that siamang, concolor, kloss and hoolock are species, while there is complete lack of agreement on lar, agile, moloch, Mueller's and pileated. The disagreement results from the use and emphasis of different character traits, and from debate on the occurrence and importance of gene flow. GIBBON CLASSIFICATION: THE ISSUE OF SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES by ERIN LEE OSTERUD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in ANTHROPOLOGY Portland State University 1989 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Erin Lee Osterud presented July 18, 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition
    This PDF includes a chapter from the following book: The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology License Terms: Made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ OA Funding Provided By: The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. The title-level DOI for this work is: doi:10.7551/mitpress/1885.001.0001 Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/edited-volume/chapter-pdf/677498/9780262268028_c002400.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 Chimpanzee Ai and Her Son Ayumu: An Episode of Education by Master- 25 Apprenticeship Tetsuro Matsuzawa I have been studying chimpanzee (Pan troglo- use has never before been found in nonhuman dytes) intelligence both in the laboratory and animals. Humans show strong hand preference in the wild (Matsuzawa 2001). Chimpanzees in on the individual level, and there is also a strong the wild use and manufacture a wide variety of right bias at the population level. The chimpan- tools, such as twigs to fish for termites or a pair zees of Bossou show a slight bias toward the of stones to crack open hard-shelled nuts. Re- right for hammering at the population level, with cent studies comparing di¤erent communities of about 67 percent of group members being right- chimpanzees have shown that each community handers. However, there is perfect correspon- develops its own unique set of cultural traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-River Gorillas
    CMS Agreement on the Distribution: General Conservation of Gorillas UNEP/GA/MOP3/Inf.9 and their Habitats of the 24 April 2019 Convention on Migratory Species Original: English THIRD MEETING OF THE PARTIES Entebbe, Uganda, 18-20 June 2019 REVISED REGIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE CROSS RIVER GORILLA (Gorilla gorilla diehli) 2014 - 2019 For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. FewerToday, thethan total population of Cross River gorillas may number fewer than 300 individuals 300 left Revised Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) 2014–2019 HopeUnderstanding the status of the changing threats across the Cross River gorilla landscape will provide key information for guiding our collectiveSurvival conservation activities cross river gorilla action plan cover_2013.indd 1 2/3/14 10:27 AM Camera trap image of a Cross River gorilla at Afi Mountain Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) This plan outlines measures that should ensure that Cross River gorilla numbers are able to increase at key core sites, allowing them to extend into areas where they have been absent for many years. cross river gorilla action plan cover_2013.indd 2 2/3/14 10:27 AM Revised Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) 2014-2019 Revised Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) 2014-2019 Compiled and edited by Andrew Dunn1, 16, Richard Bergl2, 16, Dirck Byler3, Samuel Eben-Ebai4, Denis Ndeloh Etiendem5, Roger Fotso6, Romanus Ikfuingei6, Inaoyom Imong1, 7, 16, Chris Jameson6, Liz Macfie8, 16, Bethan Mor- gan9, 16, Anthony Nchanji6, Aaron Nicholas10, Louis Nkembi11, Fidelis Omeni12, John Oates13, 16, Amy Pokemp- ner14, Sarah Sawyer15 and Elizabeth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola & Great Apes
    Ebola & Great Apes Ebola is a major threat to the survival of African apes There are direct links between Ebola outbreaks in humans and the contact with infected bushmeat from gorillas and chimpanzees. In the latest outbreak in West Africa, Ebola claimed more than 11,000 lives, but the disease has also decimated great ape populations during previous outbreaks in Central Africa. What are the best strategies for approaching zoonotic diseases like Ebola to keep both humans and great apes safe? What is Ebola ? Ebola Virus Disease, formerly known as Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever, is a highly acute, severe, and lethal disease that can affect humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. It was discovered in 1976 in the Democratic Republic of Congo and is a Filovirus, a kind of RNA virus that is 50-100 times smaller than bacteria. • The initial symptoms of Ebola can include a sudden fever, intense weakness, muscle pain and a sore throat, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Subsequent stages include vomiting, diarrhoea and, in some cases, both internal and external bleeding. • Though it is believed to be carried in bat populations, the natural reservoir of Ebola is unknown. A reservoir is the long-term host of a disease, and these hosts often do not contract the disease or do not die from it. • The virus is transmitted to people from wild animals through the consumption and handling of wild meats, also known as bushmeat, and spreads in the human population via human-to-human transmission through contact with bodily fluids. • The average Ebola case fatality rate is around 50%, though case fatality rates have varied from 25% to 90%.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Ape Conservation Fund Grants
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, International Affairs Division of International Conservation CFDA 15.629 Multinational Species Conservation Fund – Great Apes Program Summary of Projects 2006 58 Grants Total FWS Funding: $3,881,585* Total Leveraged Funds: $4,773,148 Strengthening Local Capacity to Conserve the Western Black Crested Gibbon, Vietnam. In partnership with Fauna and Flora International. This project will support on the job training of government and management board personnel and the provision of specialized training in basic management and administrative skills. As a result, local Vietnamese officials will assume greater responsibility for management, administration, and fund raising for the Hoang Lien Mountains gibbon conservation program. FWS: $44,977. Leveraged Funds: $52,740. Conservation and Management of Hoolock Gibbons: Capacity Building, Habitat Restoration, and Translocation, Bangladesh. In partnership with Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka. This project will improve the capacity of the Forest Department to monitor, study, and protect hoolock gibbons; improve conservation awareness of people living around important habitats; initiate planting of indigenous tree species important for gibbon food and cover in protected area habitats; and initiate translocation of gibbons remaining in highly degraded, fragmented habitats. FWS: $49,495. Leveraged Funds: $33,600. Green Bridges: Reconnecting Fragmented Ape Habitat in Southern Sumatra through Forest Rehabilitation and Wildlife Friendly Agroforestry, Indonesia. In
    [Show full text]