16 June 1969 Vol 3, No. 12
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 3, No. 12 (Published Fortnightly) 16m June, 1969 BRITISH ENDED MOVES British teams in Rhodesia The tour of the Scottish FOR SETTLEMENT First Division team Oyde en· gendered great enthusiasm among soccer fans and took Statement on Anglo-Rhodesian place not long before Rho desia's impending first venture into the World Cup. The visit relations 1966-1969 was a great success. STATEMENT OD Anglo-Rhodesian negotiadoos from December, 1966 A (talks OD H.M.S. Tiger), to May, 1969, has been issued as a White The famous Barbarians Paper by the Rhodesian Government. The preface says:- rugby club team played only "Representatives of the British Government have at various times, since one match in Rhodesia-in the meeting in H.M.S. Fearless and the djscussions with Mr. Thomson in Salisbury at the end of the Salisbury, made unfavourable allegations regarding the attitude of the South African tour and beat Rhodesia Government towards a settlement. This paper demonstrates that Rhodesia narrowly in a game these allegations are without substance and that the Rhodesia Government of spectacular play. have, in fact, been flexible and constructive in their approach to the nego • • • tiations. It also shows that as negotiations progressed, greater demands were The picture below sbows the made repeatedly by the British Government for further concessions from the rugby match in progress. Rhodesia Government." The Whi[e Paper continues: lLThe Rhodesia Government have constantly stated that- (i) they would be prepared to make major concessions as part of a pack age deal in order to achieve the removal of sanctions and to establish normal relations with the world community; and (ii) if it proved imJ>Ossible to attain agreement with the British Govern ment, theY. would submit to the elcc tornte their own entirely different proposals for a constitution best suited to the people of Rhodesia, notwithstanding the views of the British GovemmenL Responsible bands "This paper reHects the earnest endeavoUJ"S of the Rhodesia Government to reach a settlement and the lengths to which they were prepared to go to achieve this on the basis of a pac~gc deal. (Coali.-.cd o• •at ....) www.rhodesia.me.uk 2 RHODESIAN COMMENTARY 16th June, 1969 Statement on Anglo-Rhodesian Sovereignty of Parliament There bad been no derogation from relations 1966-1969 the sovereignty of Parliament for it not (Coadaloal fro• pap oac) The White Paper says: "It was during to have debated the proposals for a new "As settlement with the British these talks from 4th to 16th November, Constitution, said the Prime Minister, Government has proved impossible of 1968, which the Rhodesia Government Mr. Ian Smith. aUainmcnl. the Rhodesia Government thought would be the final round lead If there was an acceptance in the refer have now submitted to the electorate ing to a settlement, that the British endum it would not mean there was auto their own proposals for a constitution demonst.nlted to the fuU the extent to matically a new Constitution, because which, in their opinion, would ensure which they had circumscribed their Parliament would need to approve of the thnt government remained in respon negotiating powers through their elabora proposals by a two-thirds majority. sible hand~." tion of their six principles and their ·'But if, for some reason unforeseen to The White Paper says when Rhodesia commitments to NIBMAR, the Common me now, we are unable to get a two said it was unable to accept the Tiger wealth and the United Nations. thirds majority in the present Parlia proposals (the SLx principles) in their "As a result, agreement proved pos ment. then I don't want to beat about entirety, contact between the two Gov sible on only one other matter, that of the bush: this won't then become the ernment~ revealed the "equivocal posi the issue of safe conducts to persons Constitution of Rhodesia," said Mr. tion" adopted by the British. wishing to return to Rhodesia during the Smith. ''On the one hand they confirmed test of acceptnbility. On other matters "So don't let anybody try to suggest their adherence to the six principles as affecting the Constitution proper, as we ride roughshod over the sovereignty the basis for a settlement. but on the well as short-term issues relating solely of Parliament other hand had withdrawn aU previous to the interim position prior to im "Quite the reverse: We have been offers ... plementing the Constitution, the British meticulous in abiding by the sovereignty In a strait-jacket adopted a rigid and negative attitude of ParlFament and the rights and tnuli "In atlt:mpting to pursue these incompatible with the proper conduct tions of Parliament and it will be our palpably inconsistent policies simul of negotiations." intention to go on that way." taneously. the British found themselves Soon after the talks commenced, the bnvc to give way completely to the in a strniL-jacket of their own creation Rhodesian delegation was informed that British terms on every point." durin11- subsequent negotiations. This the British had an alternative proposal It became appnrent that the British immediately robbed the negotiations of for a second safeguard, but before it were not prepared to negotiate in the the nc.~ibility 50 necessary if the two wns revealed all the remaining points real sense of the term. parties were to settle their differences." of differet'lce would bavo to be settled. CoMtructive proposals The publication tmces exploratory When finally agreement was not reached missions from Britain leading up to the HO\\ever. even since Mr. Thomsen's on these remaining points of cilllerence, visit to Salisbury, Rhodesia has made Fearless ralk~. the British produced their new scheme. Both sides subscribed to the principle further constructive proposals. thnt any ngre:ments arrived at could The Judicial Committee of the Privy In view of the failure of the British only be within the context of a package Council was retained in a key role in to produce a form of second safeguard deal : in other words, each item relation to the specially entrenched pro \\ hich would meet basic Rhodesian negotiated would have to be part and vi~ion~ and for ordinary judtcial objccticns, the Rhodesia Government p:ncel of such a package deal, the appeals. Furthermore. final decisions were prepared to strengthen the block essential features of which would have were left outside the walls of Parlia ing mechanism in Parliament by to be the recognition of Rhodesia's ment and in the bands of the electorate, acceding to a blocking quarter plus one the majority of whom would be on the independence and the lifting of of elected African members, in addition sa.,ctions. "B'' Roll with its debased qualifications to the six Chiefs in the Senate. At the end of the Fearless talks the and in no position to form a responsible Still relying on the British under British delegation set out their terms opinion on the issues involved. taking, in terms of the Fearless docu for a settlement ment. to consider variations jn the On October 22., 1968, Rhodesia Not ac:apfable composition of the Legislature, the accepted the British offer to send Mr. Rhodesia Government offered an alter From the Rhodesia Government's native proposal for the composition of Thomson to Rhodesia. point of view. despite their preparedness "They did so because they believed the LeRislnture. to consider proposals for a second safe This had the advantage of securing thnt onlv one major ~tumbling block guard. "th~: type of proposal put for equality between Europeans and Afri remained to be overcome. that of the ward by the British was obviously not difference of opinion over the need for a cans in the Senate. In all other respects, acceptable.'' the figures were precisely the same as second safeguard. It seemed probable Although such countries as Canada, thnt the remaining points of difference. the Fearless figures, and the blocking Ghana, India. Pakistan. Nigeria. South mcchnnism would still bnve had the which -.vere of lesser importance, would Africa and Eire have abolished the n0t be unsurmountable." snme arithmetical effect. Privy Council as the final court of Also offered were new proposals on Posithe steps appeal. Mr. Thomson insisted on Following further communications, the franchise and cross-voting, while presenting this issue to the House of the Rhodesia Government said it would and in an effort to pave the way for a Commons as a major point of difference. final and satisfactory conclusion to the be prepared to examine on their merits talks. the Rhodesia Government took "By virtue of his uncompromising applications from public servants seek further positive steps towards the attitude. Mr. Thomson had succeeded ing reinstatement British position in a number of impor in converting one important issue of Conclunoa tunt respects. dispute into no less than nine. More The White Paper concludes:- Therefore. by the time Mr. Thomson over. Mr. Thomson stated that on these "The facts set out in this document arrived, there remained only one major issues the British Government were not show that the Rhodesia Government obstacle to be overcome, that of the prepared to give way, thua implying have througltout sought earnestly to second safeguard. that the Rhodesia Government would (Coalla•ed oa aat pace) www.rhodesia.me.uk 16rh June, 1969 RHODESIAN COMMENTARY 3 This thing Sounds portray tourist attractions called I ''hand-over'' PENING the annual confer 0 ence of the Local Govem ment Association, the Prime Miab ter, Mr. lan s~ wamed tbe country's dvlc leaden to be on their guard against a lumd-oftl" to majority rule, in whatever guise it might be presented, and said that for Rhodesia to rush into aay dramatic change at this stage would be to the country's periL He said there was not much point in having political independence without economic independence, for in fact with out economic independence a country A six-man financial delegation from country's outstanding tourist attractions was not really politically independent, South Africa have toured Rhodesia as -Victoria Falls, Lake Kariba, Salisbury.