DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of Two Landslides and Related Outburst

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of Two Landslides and Related Outburst COMPARISON OF LANDSLIDES AND THEIR RELATED OUTBURST FLOOD DEPOSITS, OWYHEE RIVER, SOUTHEASTERN OREGON _________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University _________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Geology _________________________________________________ by Shannon Marian Othus May 2008 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Shannon Marian Othus Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY _________________ ________________________________________ Dr. Lisa L. Ely, Committee Chair _________________ ________________________________________ Dr. Beth Pratt-Sitaula _________________ ________________________________________ Dr. Karl Lillquist _________________ ________________________________________ Dr. Wendy Bohrson, Geology Department Chair _________________ ________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT COMPARISON OF LANDSLIDES AND THEIR RELATED OUTBURST FLOOD DEPOSITS, OWYHEE RIVER, SOUTHEASTERN OREGON by Shannon Marian Othus May 2008 Numerous landslides have entered the Owyhee River canyon north of Rome, Oregon. As the river flows through different lithologic units, the style of mass wasting changes from large slump events and small rock falls to large earthflows. The change in mechanism of mass wasting from upstream to downstream seems to depend on several factors: (1) the ratio of the basalt cap to the exposed underlying sediments, (2) the composition of underlying sediments, (3) the canyon geometry, and (4) the extent and frequency of mass wasting. All three mechanisms of mass wasting have the ability to block the river channel and display associated flood deposits downstream. Only earthflows show aggradation deposits upstream, suggesting greater longevity than other types of mass wasting. Also, based on the frequency and size of related outburst flood deposits, smaller rock falls could possibly have the greatest cumulative effect on river channel evolution. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Assistance was provided by many people and organizations during this project. Funding was generously provided by the National Science Foundation grant EAR- 0617234, the CWU Department of Graduate Studies, and the Geological Society of America. Special thanks go to my field assistants, Tabitha Trosper and Leslie Hickey, for endless help in the field carrying appliances and tools back and forth across the river and hiking up giant hills in 100°F heat. Thanks also go to P. Kyle House, Liz Safran, Jim E. O’Connor, Gordon Grant, and Rose Wallick for providing hours of fun in the field and meaningful and diverse interpretations of geomorphic deposits and landforms. Thanks also go to Megan Mills-Navoa and Scott Anderson for providing terrace profiles for the Artillery reach, singing in the field, and the butt-rock. Thank you to Cassandra Fenton for providing the cosmogenic dates presented in this paper. Thanks also go to my committee and other faculty and staff of the Department of Geological Sciences, especially Craig Scrivner for putting some much needed computer programs on my laptop. Immense gratitude goes to Vicki Potts for Friday afternoon conversation involving my many students in White Swan, for always being on top of my paperwork, and knowing all of the ins-and-outs related to the bureaucracy of CWU. I would also like to thank the WATERS program for increasing my standard of living exponentially. To my fellow students of 2008, thanks for the many venting sessions regarding the many frustrations as a result of TA-ing and pagination. And my final thanks go to my advisor, Dr. Lisa Ely, whose help in writing and supporting data is immeasurable. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 1 Location…. ................................................................................................. 2 II BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 7 Geologic Setting.......................................................................................... 7 Landslides and Landslide Dams in Fluvial Systems................................. 10 Effects of Landslide Dams on River Profiles ........................................... 12 Outburst Flooding..................................................................................... 14 III METHODS ..................................................................................................... 17 Geologic Mapping.................................................................................... 17 Characterizing Landslide Events and Composition of Geology Beneath Local Basalt Cap....................................................................................... 18 Relative and Absolute Dating ................................................................... 22 Flood Boulder Analysis ............................................................................ 26 Terrace Characteristics and Longitudinal Profiles.................................... 29 IV RESULTS AND INITIAL INTERPRETATIONS......................................... 33 Mapping .................................................................................................... 33 Unit Descriptions (Plate 1)........................................................................ 35 Unit Descriptions (Plate 2)........................................................................ 43 Characterizing Landslide Events and Composition of Geology Beneath Local Basalt Cap....................................................................................... 48 Absolute Dating........................................................................................ 53 Flood Boulder Analysis ............................................................................ 57 Terrace Composition and Longitudinal Profiles....................................... 63 V DISCUSSION................................................................................................. 69 Artillery Reach.......................................................................................... 69 Artillery Landslide.................................................................................... 76 Sedimentology of Tsv Sediments at Artillery Landslide.......................... 78 v TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page Hell’s Gate Rock Fall................................................................................ 80 Artillery Reach Outburst Flood Deposits ................................................. 83 The Hole in the Ground ............................................................................ 86 Earthflow Dams ........................................................................................ 89 Sedimentology of East Spring Earthflow ................................................. 95 Aggradation Deposits and Flood Bars of the Hole in the Ground Reach......................................................................................................... 97 Landslide Comparison ............................................................................ 104 Dam Breach and Related Geomorphic Surfaces..................................... 107 Flood Boulder Analysis .......................................................................... 110 VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................... 115 Future Work............................................................................................ 120 REFERENCES CITED................................................................................. 122 APPENDICES .............................................................................................. 126 Appendix A—Hand Sample Descriptions.............................................. 126 Appendix B—Thin Section Descriptions ............................................... 129 Appendix C—Terrace Long Profiles...................................................... 133 PLATES...........................................................................................Rear Pocket Plate 1—Artillery Reach............................................................Rear Pocket Plate 2—Hole in the Ground Reach...........................................Rear Pocket vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Landslide, Landslide Dam, and Related Geomorphic Feature Characterization .............................................................................................. 49 2 Age Data Collected for Both Study Reaches ................................................. 54 3 Shear Stress of Measured Boulders ................................................................ 58 4 Velocity of Boulder Deposition...................................................................... 59 5 Boulder Measurements of East Spring Earthflow and Greeley Bar ............... 62 6 Slope of Terrace Surfaces and River Channel ................................................ 67 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Location map .................................................................................................... 3 2 Larger scale map of the study area ................................................................... 5 3 Hand sample and thin section sample locations ............................................. 21 4 Terrace
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Types of Landslides.Indd
    Landslide Types and Processes andslides in the United States occur in all 50 States. The primary regions of landslide occurrence and potential are the coastal and mountainous areas of California, Oregon, Land Washington, the States comprising the intermountain west, and the mountainous and hilly regions of the Eastern United States. Alaska and Hawaii also experience all types of landslides. Landslides in the United States cause approximately $3.5 billion (year 2001 dollars) in dam- age, and kill between 25 and 50 people annually. Casualties in the United States are primar- ily caused by rockfalls, rock slides, and debris flows. Worldwide, landslides occur and cause thousands of casualties and billions in monetary losses annually. The information in this publication provides an introductory primer on understanding basic scientific facts about landslides—the different types of landslides, how they are initiated, and some basic information about how they can begin to be managed as a hazard. TYPES OF LANDSLIDES porate additional variables, such as the rate of movement and the water, air, or ice content of The term “landslide” describes a wide variety the landslide material. of processes that result in the downward and outward movement of slope-forming materials Although landslides are primarily associ- including rock, soil, artificial fill, or a com- ated with mountainous regions, they can bination of these. The materials may move also occur in areas of generally low relief. In by falling, toppling, sliding, spreading, or low-relief areas, landslides occur as cut-and- La Conchita, coastal area of southern Califor- flowing. Figure 1 shows a graphic illustration fill failures (roadway and building excava- nia.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis
    DOCUMENT A 13.66/2: COQUILLE fiVE, LOWER S.F. 17 10 03 00* I C 66x 1 COQUILLE RIVER, UPPER S.F 17 1:-03 01* ' United States Q, '0) Departimnt of Agriculture THIS PUBLICATION Forest Serilce CMN FE CHECKED OUT Pacific Northwest Region 1995 JA* fSouth Fork Coquille Wate1hed Analysis Iteration 1.0 Powers Ranger Distric, Slsklyou National Forest September 1995 SOUTHERN OREGON UNWVERSiTY LIBRARY ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 United Stat. Depaenent of Agnculure Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 1995 SOUTH FORK COQUILLE WATERSHED ANALYSIS ITERATION 1.0 I have read this analysis and it meets the Standards and Guidelines for watershed analysis required by an amendment to the Forest Plan (Record of Decision dated April 1994). Any additional evidence needed to make a decision will be gathered site-specifically as part of a NEPA document or as an update to this document. SIGNED CoQ 4 DATE q 1T2 letE District Ranger Powers Ranger District Siskiyou National Forest South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis - September 1995 Developed by Interdisciplinary Team Members: Steve Harbert Team leader Betsy Howell Wildlife Biologist Dave Shea Botantist, Wildlife Biologist Ruth Sisko Forester Cindy Ricks Geologist Chris Parks Hydrologist Max Yager Fish Biologist Kathy Helm Writer-Editor (March-April 1995), BLM Tina Harbert Writer-Editor (May-July 1995), Powers R.D. Joe Hallett Cultural Resource Key Support: Joel King Forest Planner, Siskiyou National Forest Sue Olson Acting District Ranger, Powers R.D. (Jan-May 1995) Carl Linderman District Ranger, Powers R.D. Marshall Foster GIS, Powers R.D. Jodi Shorb Computer Assistant Linda Spencer Computer Support For Further Information, contact: Powers Ranger District Powers, OR 97466 (503) 439-3011 The policy of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, or disability, familial status, or political affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geologic Assessment of the Slope Movements And
    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1113–1126, 2013 Natural Hazards Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1113/2013/ doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1113-2013 and Earth System and Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry and Physics and Physics Engineering geologic assessment of the slope movements and Discussions Open Access Open Access liquefaction failures of the 23 October 2011 Van earthquakeAtmospheric Atmospheric Measurement Measurement M = ( w 7.2) Techniques Techniques A. Karakas¸, O.¨ Coruk, and B. Dogan˘ Discussions Open Access Open Access Kocaeli University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geological Engineering, Izmit,˙ Kocaeli, Turkey Biogeosciences Correspondence to: A. Karakas¸([email protected]) Biogeosciences Discussions Received: 30 October 2012 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: – Revised: 29 January 2013 – Accepted: 18 April 2013 – Published: 26 April 2013 Open Access Open Access Climate Climate Abstract. On 23 October 2011, a M = 7.2 earthquake oc- 1 Introduction w of the Past of the Past curred in the Van Province in eastern Turkey, killing 604 peo- Discussions ple. The earthquake was triggered by a thrust fault due to a Earthquakes are natural events that have different effects on compression stress in the region, and caused extensive dam- the earth. Some effects severely affect humans, man-made Open Access Open Access age over a large area. Many structures in the earthquake re- structures, and nature.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-92-09, Preliminary Geologic Map of the Jordan Craters South Quadrangle, Malheur County, Oregon
    OPEN-FILE REPORT 0-92-09 PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE JORDAN CRATERS SOUTH QUADRANGLE MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON By M. L. Ferns, and N. S. MacLeod Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries This unpublished Open-File Report has not been reviewed and may not meet all Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries' standards. Field work conducted in 1990/1991 Map Scale: 1:24,000 Funding Statement: Funded jointly by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, the Oregon State Lottery, and the U. S. Geological Survey COGEOMAP Program as part of a cooperative effort to map the west half of the lo by 2O Boise sheet, eastern Oregon. Jordan Craters South A distinctive, densely-welded, high-silica rhyolite ashflow tuff (Ttlg?) comprises the oldest unit exposed in the Jordan Craters South quadrangle. The ashflow is characterized by high silica and low alumina abundance5 and is correlative with tuffs mapped by Plumley (1984) as Leslie Gulch Tuff in The Hole in the Ground quadrangle to the northwest. If his correlation is correct, Ttlg? is part of the outflow sheet erupted during formation of the Mahogany Mountain caldera tn the northeast. The ashflow is overlain by tuffaceous siltstones (Tsts) and aphyric platy andesite flows (Tmv). Tilted fault blocks comprised of all three units from steptoes around which younger basalts (Tbdb, Tbtm, QTb, Qbcb, Qbrb, and Qbjc) have flowed. The youngest of these (Qbjc) erupted at about 3,000 years ago from a small vent north of the quadrangle at Jordan Crater. The surface of the Qbjc flow is free of wind- blown silt and soil and contains many fragile surface features that are characteristic of very young basalt flows.
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL RESOURCES of the JORDAN CRATERS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA, MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON By
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNTIED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE JORDAN CRATERS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA, MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON By J.P. Calzia1, Susan Hubbard-Sharpless2, R.L. Turner3, Andrew Griscorn1, and D.L. Sawatzky3 U.S. Geological Survey and J.M. Linne3 U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-572 Prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. 1 - Menlo Park, CA 94025 2Blacksburg, VA 24060 3Spokane, WA 99202 1988 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Area The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21,1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Jordan Craters Wilderness Study Area (OR-003-128), Malheur County, Oregon. CONTENTS Summary 1 Abstract 1 Character and setting 1 Identified mineral resources and mineral resource potential 1 Introduction 1 Location and physiography 1 Previous studies 3 Present investigations 3 Appraisal of identified resources 3 Assessment of mineral resource potential 3 Geology 3 Geochemistry 4 Geophysics 4 Mineral resource potential 5 References cited 6 Appendixes 8 Definition of levels of mineral resource potential and certainty of assessment 9 Resource/reserve classification 10 Geologic time chart 11 FIGURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 State Risk Assessment
    Chapter 2: RISK ASSESSMENT | State Risk Assessment | Cultural Resources Summary » Wildfire 2.2 State Risk Assessment Requirement: 44 CFR §201.4(c)(2)(i): The risk assessment shall include… (i) An overview of the type and location of all natural hazards that can affect the State, including information on previous occurrences of hazard events, as well as the probability of future hazard events, using maps where appropriate; The spatial distribution of the facilities within hazard zones is not easily viewed on a statewide map. Therefore, maps depicting hazard zones and facilities within those zones have only been created at the regional scale. Those maps can be found in section 2.3, Regional Risk Assessments. Oregon Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan | September 2020 163 Chapter 2: RISK ASSESSMENT | State Risk Assessment | Coastal Hazards Summary » Wildfire 2.2.1 Coastal Hazards The Pacific Northwest (PNW) coast of Figure 2-29. Erosion at The Capes Oregon is without doubt one of the most Condominiums, Oceanside, Oregon dynamic coastal landscapes in North America, evident by its long sandy beaches, sheer coastal cliffs, dramatic headlands and vistas, and ultimately the power of the Pacific Ocean that serves to erode and change the shape of the coast. It is these qualities along with its various natural resources that have drawn people to live along its narrow shores. However, coastal communities are increasingly under threat from a variety of natural hazards that all come together along the coastal strip. These include wave-induced coastal erosion (both short and long term), wave runup and overtopping (wave-induced flood hazards), inundation Notes: The Capes, a multi-million dollar condominium of homes by wind-blown sand, coastal complex constructed on an old Holocene dune field landslides, earthquakes, and potentially adjacent to Oceanside.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Movements General Anatomy
    CE/SC 10110-20110: Planet Earth Mass Movements Earth Portrait of a Planet Fifth Edition Chapter 16 Mass movement (or mass wasting) is the downslope motion of rock, regolith (soil, sediment, and debris), snow, and ice. General Anatomy Discrete slump blocks Head scarp Bulging toe Road for scale Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Fractures rock, loosens soil particles. Seismic energy overstresses the system. Yungay, Peru, in the Santa River Valley beneath the heavily glaciated Nevado Huascarán (21,860 feet). May, 1970, earthquake occurred offshore ~100 km away - triggered many small rock falls. An 800-meter-wide block of ice was dislodged and avalanched downhill, scooping out small lakes and breaking off large masses of rock debris. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 More than 50 million cubic meters of muddy debris traveled 3.7 km (12,000 feet) vertically and 14.5 km (9 miles) horizontally in less than 4 minutes! Main mass of material traveled down a steep valley, blocking the Santa River and burying ~18,000 people in Ranrachirca. A small part shot up the valley wall, was momentarily airborne before burying the village of Yungay. Estimated death toll = 17,000. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Before After Whats Left of Yungay. Common Mass Movements Rockfalls and Slides Slow Fast Debris Flows Slumping Lahars and Mudflows Solifluction and Creep These different kinds of mass movements are arranged from slowest (left) to fastest (right). Types of Mass Movement Different types of mass movement based on 4 factors: 1) Type of material involved (rock, regolith, snow, ice); 2) Velocity of the movement (slow, intermediate, fast); 3) Character of the movement (chaotic cloud, slurry, coherent mass; 4) Environment (subaerial, submarine).
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Owyhee Canyonlands
    Oregon’s Owyhee Canyonlands Protecting Our Desert Heritage A Citizens Guide to the Wild Owyhee Canyonlands Three Fingers Butte, proposed Wilderness in the Lower Owyhee Canyonlands. Photo: © Mark W. Lisk 2 oregon’s owyhee canyonlands: protecting oregon’s desert heritage At 1.9 million acres, the Owyhee Canyonlands represents one of the largest conservation opportunities in the United States. Welcome to Oregon’s Owyhee Canyonlands—the center of the sagebrush sea and iconic landscape of the arid West. This remote corner of Southeast Oregon calls to those seeking solitude, unconfined space and a self-reliant way of life. Come raft the Wild & Scenic Owyhee River; hunt big game and upland birds; and walk dry streambeds surrounded by geologic formations from another world. We live and visit here because it is truly unique. owyhee canyonlands campaign 3 Greeley Flat–Owyhee Breaks Wilderness Study Area. Photo © Mark W. Lisk The Oregon Owyhee Canyonlands Campaign is working to protect one of the most expansive and dramatic landscapes in the West, featuring rare wildlife, pristine waterways and incredible outdoor recreational opportunities. Stretching from the mountain ranges of the Great Basin to fertile expanses of the Snake River Plain, the Owyhee Desert ecosystem encompasses nearly 9 million acres across three states. Local residents refer to it as ION country, since the Canyonlands lie at the confluence of Idaho, Oregon and Nevada. The name Seventeen Owyhee hearkens back to a time before state lines were drawn, when three Hawaiian trappers were contiguous Wilderness Study killed by local residents. An archaic spelling of their island home (oh-WYE-hee) became the name of this Areas, spanning landscape of deep riverine canyons and sagebrush sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Earthflows on Stream Channel and Valley Floor
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sarah B. Vest for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on January 12, 1988 Title: Effects of Earthflowson Stream Channel and Valley Floor Morphology, Western Cascade Range, Oregon Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Frederick J. Swanson Slow moving earthflows (0.1 15 m/yr.) may constrict valley floors and directly impingeon stream channels. Earthflows that move laterally into channels deliver organic andinorganic material to the stream from the earthflow toe. If the amount and particle size of this material is too largeto be removed by streamflow, aggradation and subsequent steepening ofthe channel gradient occur. However, if the rate of material input istoo slow or the size of material is too small, the materialcan be removed as bedload or suspended sediment load andthere will be no change in gradient. Where earthflow encroachmentcauses channel aggradation, the valley floor and channel upstream of thezone of direct earthflow constriction experiences widening anddecrease in the gradient of the valley floor and channel. This increase in width of the channel is due to the gradient changein the earthflow-constricted zone and to hydraulic backwatereffects at stream flows which carry bedload. Effects of the earthflowconstriction at five sites in the western Cascade Range of Oregonare examined at two scales 1) that 2 3 of stream reaches (10 to 10 meters of channel length inareas having similiar valley floorcharacteristics) and 2) that of channel units (features which are 1to 10 channel widths in length,e.g. pools, riffles and cascades). In earthflow-constricted reaches (defined by length of the earthflowtoe entering the channel) where channel gradient is steepest,there is a greater percentage of cascades per unit of reach length.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mink Creek Earthflow March, 1995
    Forest Sciences Prince Rupert Forest Region Extension Note # 04 The Mink Creek Earthflow March, 1995 Research Issue Groups: Forest Biology Forest Growth Soils Wildlife Habitat Silviculture Timber Harvesting Ecosystem Inventory and Classification Biodiversity Figure 1. The Mink Creek earthflow retrogressed about 600 meters. Ecosystem Management Background Hydrology (sediments of glacial origin deposited We generally associate slope failures in the sea) flowed and slid rapidly Geomorphology with steep, mountainous areas. Flat into Mink Creek, near Terrace, BC. to rolling, subdued terrain is thought Spoil from the earthflow crater filled the incised channel of Mink Creek, Extension of as having a relatively low risk of landslide occurrence. This is not extending downstream approximately always the case. Sometime, between one kilometer. The debris dammed Forest Engineering mid-December, 1993 and early the creek, raised the water level by 10 January, 1994, approximately 23 meters and backed water upstream hectares of glaciomarine sediments 1200 meters. Forest Sciences, Prince Rupert Forest Region Bag 5000, Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 847-7500 (FAX 847-7217) ocean water filled the valley, creating a fjord. Glacial retreat up the Kitsumkalum-Kitimat Trough was relatively rapid, although there were several periods when the ice front was stable. During one such period, the snout of the stable, calving glacier was situated near the present location of Thornhill. Sediment- laden meltwaters poured from the ice front. Gravels and sands were deposited near the snout of the glacier forming a large sandur, or outwash plain (Terrace Airport). Smaller clay and silt particles remained suspended in the sea much longer and were deposited further from the ice front, forming silty-clay deposits such as those found at Mink Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed Water Quality
    Water Quality Restoration Plan Southern Oregon Coastal Basin North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Medford District Ashland Resource Area Butte Falls Resource Area Lakeview District Klamath Falls Resource Area May 2006 North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed at a Glance Hydrologic Unit Code Number (Little 1710030708 Butte Creek) WQRP Area/Ownership Total: 125,778 acres BLM: 26,959 acres (21%) U. S. Forest Service: 59,875 acres (48%) Bureau of Reclamation: 5 acres (<.01%) Private: 38,939 acres (31%) 303(d) Stream Miles Assessed Total: 65.4 miles BLM Ownership: 15.7 miles 303(d) Listed Parameters Temperature, Sedimentation, E. Coli, pH Key Resources and Uses Salmonids, domestic, aesthetic Known Human Activities Agriculture, forestry, roads, recreation, rural residential development Natural Factors Geology: volcanic Soils: various series and complexes Statement of Purpose This water quality restoration plan is prepared to meet the requirements of Section 303(d) of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act. Table of Contents Page Element 1 Condition Assessment and Problem Description 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Watershed Characterization 4 C.Temperature 16 D. Sedimentation 23 E.E.Coli 31 F.pH 34 Element 2 Goals and Objectives 36 Element 3 Proposed Management Measures 39 Element 4 Time Line for Implementation 40 Element 5 Responsible Parties 41 Element 6 Reasonable Assurance of Implementation 41 Element 7 Monitoring and Evaluation 42 Element 8 Public Involvement 44 Element 9 Costs and Funding 44 Element 10 Citation to Legal Authorities 45 References 46 List of Preparers 48 List of Tables Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Yield, Spatial Characteristics, and the Long-Term
    Sediment yield, spatial characteristics, and the long-term evolution of active earthfl ows determined from airborne LiDAR and historical aerial photographs, Eel River, California Benjamin H. Mackey†, and Joshua J. Roering Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA ABSTRACT period, equating to a regional yield of 1100 by sliding along transient shear surfaces with t km–2 yr–1 (~0.45 mm/yr) if distributed across a degree of internal deformation or fl ow. They In mountainous landscapes with weak, the study area. As such, a small fraction of span a range of landslide failure styles and have fi ne-grained rocks, earthfl ows can dominate the landscape can account for half of the re- been variably described as landslide complexes erosion and landscape evolution by supply- gional denudation rate estimated from sus- (Iverson, 1986a), landslides (Schulz et al., ing sediment to channels and controlling pended sediment records (2200 t km–2 yr–1 or 2009b), earth slides (Cruden and Varnes, 1996), hillslope morphology. To estimate the con- ~0.9 mm/yr). We propose a conceptual model and mudslides (Chandler and Brunsden, 1995; tribution of earthfl ows to regional sediment for long-term earthfl ow evolution wherein Glastonbury and Fell, 2008). Hereafter, we budgets and identify patterns of landslide ac- earthfl ows experience intermittent activity use the term earthfl ow as advocated by Hungr tivity, earthfl ow movement needs to be quan- and long periods of dormancy when limited et al. (2001) to describe large, slow-moving tifi ed over signifi cant spatial and temporal by the availability of readily mobilized sedi- landslides with macroscale, fl ow-like morphol- scales.
    [Show full text]