DOCSLIB.ORG

Landslide Types and Processes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landslide Types and Processes Chapter Three Landslide Types and Processes David J. Varnes3 It is the purpose of this chapter to re- geology, and hence lie outside the prov- view the whole range of earth move- ince of the committee. ments that may properly be regarded as landslides and to classify these move- Types of Landslides ments according to factors that have some bearing on prevention or control. CLASSIFICATION As defined for use in this volume the term "landslide" denotes downward and Many classifications have already been outward movement of slope-forming ma- proposed for earth movements, based terials composed of natural rock, soils, variously on the kind of . material, type artificial fills, -or combinations of these of movement, causes, and many other materials. The moving mass may pro- factors. There are, in. fact, so many such ceed by any one of three principal types schemes embedded with varying degrees of movement: falling, sliding, or flowing, of firmness in geological and engineering or by their combinations. Parts of a literature that the committee has ap- landslide may move upward while other proached the question of a "new" classi- parts move downward. The lower limit fication with considerable misgivings. As of the rate of movement of landslide ma- Terzaghi has stated (1950, p. 88), "A terial is restricted in this book by the phenomenon involving such a multitude economic aspect to that actual or po- of combinations between materials and tential rate of movement which provokes disturbing agents opens unlimited vistas correction or maintenance. Normal sur- for the classification enthusiast. The re- ficial creep is excluded. Also, most types sult of the classification depends quite of movement due to freezing and thaw- obviously on the classifier's opinion re- ing (solifluction), together with ava- garding the relative importance of the lanches that are composed mostly of many different aspects of the classified snow and ice, are not considered as land- phenomenon." Each classification, in- slides in the sense here intended, al- cluding the one proposed in this volume, though they often pose serious problems is best adapted to a particular mode of to the highway engineer. Such move- investigation, and each has its inherent ments are not discussed because they advantages and disadvantages. However, appear to depend on factors of weather, as pointed out by Ward (1945, p. 172), ice physics, and thermodynamics, rather "A classification of the types of failure is necessary to the engineer to enable than on principles of soil mechanics or him to distinguish and recognize the '' Publication authoricecl by the Director, U. S. different phenomena for purposes of de- Geological Survey. sign and also to enable him to take the 20 LANDSLIDE TYPES AND PROCESSES 21 appropriate remedial or safety measures (b) the type of movement, which usu- where necessary. The geographer, and ally may be determined by a short period geologist need a classification so that of observation or by the shape of the they may interpret the past and predict slide and arrangement of debris. In its the present trends of topography as re- emphasis on type of movement the classi- vealed by their observations." fication resembles, more than any other, The classification adopted there is that proposed by Sharpe (1938) for shown in Plate 1 and is further described landslides 'and other related movements. in the following paragraphs. Definitions The chart (P1. 1) shows examples of of the parts of a landslide appear in slides by small drawings. The type of Plate 1-t. An abbreviated version, with- material involved is indicated by the out diagrams and explanatory txt, is horizontal position of the drawing with- shown in Figure 5. In prepaiing' this in the chart; the type of movement is classification of landslides, a deliberate indicated by the vertical position of the effort has been made to set it up ac- drawing. Water content of flow-type cording to features that may be observed landslides is indicated by the relative at once or with a minimum of investi- vertical position of the drawing within gation, and without reference to the the flow group. Each drawing also has a causes of the slides. Two main variables note giving the general range of velocity are considered: ('a) the type of material of movement of the landslide type, ac- involved, which usually is apparent oii cording to the scale of velocities at the inspection or preliminary boring; and bottom of the chart (P1. 1-u). TYPE OF TYPE OF MATERIAL MOVEMENT BEDROCK SOILS FALLS ROCKFALL SOILFALL ROTATIONAL PLANAR PLANAR ROTATIONAL FEW UNITS SLUMP BLOCK GLIDE BLOCK GLIDE BLOCK SLUMP SLIDES I ' DEBRIS FAILURE BY, MANY UNITS ROCKSLIDE SLIDE LATERAL SPREADING A L L UNCONSOLIDATED ROCK FRAGMENTS SAND OR SILT MIXED MOSTLY PLASTIC ROCI\FRAGMENT DRY SAND LOESS 'FLOW RUN FLOW FLOWS ' RAFD DEBRIS SLOW EARTHFLOW AVALANCHE EARTHFLOW SAND OR SILT WET DEBRIS FLOW FLOW MUDFLOW COMPLEX COMBINATIONS OF MATERIALS OR TYPE OF MOVEMENT Figure 5. Classification of landslides, abbreviated version (see plate 1 for complete chart with drawings and explanatory text). 22 LANDSLIDES .J— Limestone, sandstone, - lava or other bed resistant to erosion. Shale, tuff, volcanic ash or I other easily weathered bed A. Differential weathering B. Frost wedging in jointed homogeneous rock Water—filled joint '1 I L_) C. Jointed homogeneous rock. D. Homogeneous jointed rock. Hydrostatic pressure acting Blocks left unsupported or on loosened blocks. loosened by overbreakage and blast fracture. E. Either homogeneous jointed F. Either homogeneous jointed rock or resistant bed rock or resistant bed underlain by easily eroded underlain by easily eroded rock. Wave Cut cliff, rock. Stream Cut cliff. Figure 6. Examples of rockfalls. LANDSLIDE TYPES AND PROCESSES 23 Figure 7. Rockfall due to undercutting along shore of Las Vegas Bay, Lake Mead. Nev. The rock is the Muddy Creek formation (Pliocene?) consisting here of siltstone overlain by indurated breccia. The move- ment is straight down by gravity, in contrast to rockslide. which slides on a sloping surface. (Photograph by U. S. Hureau of Reclamation. February 24, 1949) Materials are classed, for falls and TYPE I - FALLS slides, into bedrock and soils. The term "soils" is used in the engineering sense Falls are very common. In rockfall and and includes elastic material, rock frag- soilfall, the moving mass travels mostly ments, sheared or weathered bedrock, through the air by free fall, leaping, and organic matter. Falls and slides in- bounding, or rolling, with little or no volving bedrock are shown in the upper interaction between one moving unit and left part of the chart; those involving another (P1. 1-a, b). Movements are very soils are shown in the upper right part rapid to extremely rapid (see rate of of the chart. The materials of flows are movement scale, P1. 1-u) and may or may grouped into various categories. Material not be preceded by minor movements. is classified according to its state prior Several varieties of rockfall are illus- to initial movement, or, if the type of trated in Figures 6 and 7. movement changes, according to its state at the time of the change to the new TYPE II - SLIDES type of movement. Types of movement are divided into In true slides, the movement results three principal groups - falls, slides, from shear failure along one or several and flows. A fourth group, complex surfaces, which are either visible or may slides, is a combination of any or all of reasonably be inferred. Two subgroups the other three types of movement. There of slides may be distinguished according may be, of course, variations in the type to the mechanics of movement - those of movement and in the materials from in which the moving mass is not great- place to place, or from time to time, in ly deformed (Type hA), and those an actual landslide, so that a rigid classi- which are greatly deformed or consist of fication is neither practical nor desir- many small units (Type JIB). The Type able. hA group includes the familiar slump 24 LANDSLIDES or rotational shear types of slides; it in- slope (see Fig. 9). In slumps the move- cludes also undeformed slides along more ment is more or less rotary about an axis or less planar surfaces, for which the that is parallel to the slope. The top sur- term "block glides" is here proposed. Type JIB slides include most rockslides, debris slides, and failures by lateral spreading. A - Relatively Uncle formed Material Type IIA slides are made up of one or a few moving units. The maximum di- mension of the units is greater than the relative displacement between units and is comparable to or greater than the dis- placement of the center of gravity of the whole mass. Movement may be structural- Figure 9. Rotational shear on cylindrical surface. ly controlled by surfaces of weakness, such as faults, bedding planes, or joints. Slumps. - The commonest examples of face of each unit tilts backward toward Type hA or undeformed glides are the slope (see Figs. 9, 10, 11, and 12, slumps. Slumps, and slumps combined and P1. 1-c and 1-h). with other types of movement, make up Figure 10 illustrates some of the com- a high proportion of the landslide prob- moner varieties of slump failure in va- lem facing the highway engineer. The rious kinds of material. Figure 12 shows movement in slumps takes place only th'e backward tilting of strata exposed along internal slip surfaces. The exposed in a longitudinal section through a small cracks are concentric and concave to- slump in lake beds. Although the sur- ward the direction of movement. In many face of rupture of slumps is a concave- slumps the underlying surface of rup- upward curve, it is seldom a circular arc ture, together with the exposed scarps, of uniform curvature.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newmark Sliding Block Analysis
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1411 9 Predicting Earthquake-Induced Landslide Displacements Using Newmark's Sliding Block Analysis RANDALL W. }IBSON A principal cause of earthquake damage is landsliding, and the peak ground accelerations (PGA) below which no slope dis­ ability to predict earthquake-triggered landslide displacements is placement will occur. In cases where the PGA does exceed important for many types of seismic-hazard analysis and for the the yield acceleration, pseudostatic analysis has proved to be design of engineered slopes. Newmark's method for modeling a landslide as a rigid-plastic block sliding on an inclined plane pro­ vastly overconservative because many slopes experience tran­ vides a workable means of predicting approximate landslide dis­ sient earthquake accelerations well above their yield accel­ placements; this method yields much more useful information erations but experience little or no permanent displacement than pseudostatic analysis and is far more practical than finite­ (2). The utility of pseudostatic analysis is thus limited because element modeling. Applying Newmark's method requires know­ it provides only a single numerical threshold below which no ing the yield or critical acceleration of the landslide (above which displacement is predicted and above which total, but unde­ permanent displacement occurs), which can be determined from the static factor of safety and from the landslide geometry. Earth­ fined, "failure" is predicted. In fact, pseudostatic analysis tells quake acceleration-time histories can be selected to represent the the user nothing about what will occur when the yield accel­ shaking conditions of interest, and those parts of the record that eration is exceeded. lie above the critical acceleration are double integrated to deter­ At the other end of the spectrum, advances in two-dimensional mine the permanent landslide displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Maximum Road Friction Coefficient and Optimal Slip Ratio Based on Road Type Recognition
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ·1018· Vol. 27,aNo. 5,a2014 DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2014.0725.128, available online at www.springerlink.com; www.cjmenet.com; www.cjmenet.com.cn Identification of Maximum Road Friction Coefficient and Optimal Slip Ratio Based on Road Type Recognition GUAN Hsin, WANG Bo, LU Pingping*, and XU Liang State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China Received November 21, 2013; revised June 9, 2014; accepted July 25, 2014 Abstract: The identification of maximum road friction coefficient and optimal slip ratio is crucial to vehicle dynamics and control. However, it is always not easy to identify the maximum road friction coefficient with high robustness and good adaptability to various vehicle operating conditions. The existing investigations on robust identification of maximum road friction coefficient are unsatisfactory. In this paper, an identification approach based on road type recognition is proposed for the robust identification of maximum road friction coefficient and optimal slip ratio. The instantaneous road friction coefficient is estimated through the recursive least square with a forgetting factor method based on the single wheel model, and the estimated road friction coefficient and slip ratio are grouped in a set of samples in a small time interval before the current time, which are updated with time progressing. The current road type is recognized by comparing the samples of the estimated road friction coefficient with the standard road friction coefficient of each typical road, and the minimum statistical error is used as the recognition principle to improve identification robustness. Once the road type is recognized, the maximum road friction coefficient and optimal slip ratio are determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Silt Loam Oklahoma State Soil
    PORT SILT LOAM Oklahoma State Soil SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA Introduction Many states have a designated state bird, flower, fish, tree, rock, etc. And, many states also have a state soil – one that has significance or is important to the state. The Port Silt Loam is the official state soil of Oklahoma. Let’s explore how the Port Silt Loam is important to Oklahoma. History Soils are often named after an early pioneer, town, county, community or stream in the vicinity where they are first found. The name “Port” comes from the small com- munity of Port located in Washita County, Oklahoma. The name “silt loam” is the texture of the topsoil. This texture consists mostly of silt size particles (.05 to .002 mm), and when the moist soil is rubbed between the thumb and forefinger, it is loamy to the feel, thus the term silt loam. In 1987, recognizing the importance of soil as a resource, the Governor and Oklahoma Legislature selected Port Silt Loam as the of- ficial State Soil of Oklahoma. What is Port Silt Loam Soil? Every soil can be separated into three separate size fractions called sand, silt, and clay, which makes up the soil texture. They are present in all soils in different propor- tions and say a lot about the character of the soil. Port Silt Loam has a silt loam tex- ture and is usually reddish in color, varying from dark brown to dark reddish brown. The color is derived from upland soil materials weathered from reddish sandstones, siltstones, and shales of the Permian Geologic Era.
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fence (1056)
    Silt Fence (1056) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Standard I. Definition IV. Federal, State, and Local Laws Silt fence is a temporary sediment barrier of Users of this standard shall be aware of entrenched permeable geotextile fabric designed applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, to intercept and slow the flow of sediment-laden regulations, or permit requirements governing sheet flow runoff from small areas of disturbed the use and placement of silt fence. This soil. standard does not contain the text of federal, state, or local laws. II. Purpose V. Criteria The purpose of this practice is to reduce slope length of the disturbed area and to intercept and This section establishes the minimum standards retain transported sediment from disturbed areas. for design, installation and performance requirements. III. Conditions Where Practice Applies A. Placement A. This standard applies to the following applications: 1. When installed as a stand-alone practice on a slope, silt fence shall be placed on 1. Erosion occurs in the form of sheet and the contour. The parallel spacing shall rill erosion1. There is no concentration not exceed the maximum slope lengths of water flowing to the barrier (channel for the appropriate slope as specified in erosion). Table 1. 2. Where adjacent areas need protection Table 1. from sediment-laden runoff. Slope Fence Spacing 3. Where effectiveness is required for one < 2% 100 feet year or less. 2 to 5% 75 feet 5 to 10% 50 feet 4. Where conditions allow for silt fence to 10 to 33% 25 feet be properly entrenched and staked as > 33% 20 feet outlined in the Criteria Section V.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Landslides.Indd
    Landslide Types and Processes andslides in the United States occur in all 50 States. The primary regions of landslide occurrence and potential are the coastal and mountainous areas of California, Oregon, Land Washington, the States comprising the intermountain west, and the mountainous and hilly regions of the Eastern United States. Alaska and Hawaii also experience all types of landslides. Landslides in the United States cause approximately $3.5 billion (year 2001 dollars) in dam- age, and kill between 25 and 50 people annually. Casualties in the United States are primar- ily caused by rockfalls, rock slides, and debris flows. Worldwide, landslides occur and cause thousands of casualties and billions in monetary losses annually. The information in this publication provides an introductory primer on understanding basic scientific facts about landslides—the different types of landslides, how they are initiated, and some basic information about how they can begin to be managed as a hazard. TYPES OF LANDSLIDES porate additional variables, such as the rate of movement and the water, air, or ice content of The term “landslide” describes a wide variety the landslide material. of processes that result in the downward and outward movement of slope-forming materials Although landslides are primarily associ- including rock, soil, artificial fill, or a com- ated with mountainous regions, they can bination of these. The materials may move also occur in areas of generally low relief. In by falling, toppling, sliding, spreading, or low-relief areas, landslides occur as cut-and- La Conchita, coastal area of southern Califor- flowing. Figure 1 shows a graphic illustration fill failures (roadway and building excava- nia.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Research on Conceptual Design of a Wind Tunnel for Instructional Purposes
    AC 2012-3461: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH ON CONCEPTUAL DE- SIGN OF A WIND TUNNEL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES Peter John Arslanian, NASA/Computer Sciences Corporation Peter John Arslanian currently holds an engineering position at Computer Sciences Corporation. He works as a Ground Safety Engineer supporting Sounding Rocket and ANTARES launch vehicles at NASA, Wallops Island, Va. He also acts as an Electrical Engineer supporting testing and validation for NASA’s Low Density Supersonic Decelerator vehicle. Arslanian has received an Undergraduate Degree with Honors in Engineering with an Aerospace Specialization from the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore (UMES) in May 2011. Prior to receiving his undergraduate degree, he worked as an Action Sport Design Engineer for Hydroglas Composites in San Clemente, Calif., from 1994 to 2006, designing personnel watercraft hulls. Arslanian served in the U.S. Navy from 1989 to 1993 as Lead Electronics Technician for the Automatic Carrier Landing System aboard the U.S.S. Independence CV-62, stationed in Yokosuka, Japan. During his enlistment, Arslanian was honored with two South West Asia Service Medals. Dr. Payam Matin, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Payam Matin is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES). Matin has received his Ph.D. in mechanical engi- neering from Oakland University, Rochester, Mich., in May 2005. He has taught a number of courses in the areas of mechanical engineering and aerospace at UMES. Matin’s research has been mostly in the areas of computational mechanics and experimental mechanics. Matin has published more than 20 peer- reviewed journal and conference papers.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis
    DOCUMENT A 13.66/2: COQUILLE fiVE, LOWER S.F. 17 10 03 00* I C 66x 1 COQUILLE RIVER, UPPER S.F 17 1:-03 01* ' United States Q, '0) Departimnt of Agriculture THIS PUBLICATION Forest Serilce CMN FE CHECKED OUT Pacific Northwest Region 1995 JA* fSouth Fork Coquille Wate1hed Analysis Iteration 1.0 Powers Ranger Distric, Slsklyou National Forest September 1995 SOUTHERN OREGON UNWVERSiTY LIBRARY ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 United Stat. Depaenent of Agnculure Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 1995 SOUTH FORK COQUILLE WATERSHED ANALYSIS ITERATION 1.0 I have read this analysis and it meets the Standards and Guidelines for watershed analysis required by an amendment to the Forest Plan (Record of Decision dated April 1994). Any additional evidence needed to make a decision will be gathered site-specifically as part of a NEPA document or as an update to this document. SIGNED CoQ 4 DATE q 1T2 letE District Ranger Powers Ranger District Siskiyou National Forest South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis - September 1995 Developed by Interdisciplinary Team Members: Steve Harbert Team leader Betsy Howell Wildlife Biologist Dave Shea Botantist, Wildlife Biologist Ruth Sisko Forester Cindy Ricks Geologist Chris Parks Hydrologist Max Yager Fish Biologist Kathy Helm Writer-Editor (March-April 1995), BLM Tina Harbert Writer-Editor (May-July 1995), Powers R.D. Joe Hallett Cultural Resource Key Support: Joel King Forest Planner, Siskiyou National Forest Sue Olson Acting District Ranger, Powers R.D. (Jan-May 1995) Carl Linderman District Ranger, Powers R.D. Marshall Foster GIS, Powers R.D. Jodi Shorb Computer Assistant Linda Spencer Computer Support For Further Information, contact: Powers Ranger District Powers, OR 97466 (503) 439-3011 The policy of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, or disability, familial status, or political affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fences: an Economical Technique for Measuring Hillslope Soil Erosion
    United States Department of Agriculture Silt Fences: An Economical Technique Forest Service for Measuring Hillslope Soil Erosion Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Peter R. Robichaud Report RMRS-GTR-94 Robert E. Brown August 2002 Robichaud, Peter R.; Brown, Robert E. 2002. Silt fences: an economical technique for measuring hillslope soil erosion. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-94. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p. Abstract—Measuring hillslope erosion has historically been a costly, time-consuming practice. An easy to install low-cost technique using silt fences (geotextile fabric) and tipping bucket rain gauges to measure onsite hillslope erosion was developed and tested. Equipment requirements, installation procedures, statis- tical design, and analysis methods for measuring hillslope erosion are discussed. The use of silt fences is versatile; various plot sizes can be used to measure hillslope erosion in different settings and to determine effectiveness of various treatments or practices. Silt fences are installed by making a sediment trap facing upslope such that runoff cannot go around the ends of the silt fence. The silt fence is folded to form a pocket for the sediment to settle on and reduce the possibility of sediment undermining the silt fence. Cleaning out and weighing the accumulated sediment in the field can be accomplished with a portable hanging or plat- form scale at various time intervals depending on the necessary degree of detail in the measurement of erosion (that is, after every storm, quarterly, or seasonally). Silt fences combined with a tipping bucket rain gauge provide an easy, low-cost method to quantify precipitation/hillslope erosion relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • Summarization and Comparison of Engineering Properties of Loess in the United States
    Summarization and Comparison of Engineering Properties of Loess in the United States J. B. SHEELER, Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, Iowa State University •LARGE deposits of loess are found in many parts of the United States, but published values of the engineering properties of loess are relatively scarce. The data in this paper were gathered to indicate similarities and compare the properties of loess from one area with another. Loess is composed primarily of rather loosely arranged angular grains of sand, silt, and clay. Silt is usually the dominant size. Calcite is also generally present in amounts ranging from zero to more than 10 percent of the total soil.. The aeolian hypothesis of loess deposition is compatible with the physical charac­ teristics of undisturbed loess masses. This hypothesis states that fine-grained ma­ terial was transported, sorted, and redeposited by wind action and thus became loess. During deposition, moisture and clay minerals are believed responsible for cementing the coarser grains together to form a loose structure. The loess is therefore subject to loss of shear strength due to water softening the clay bonds and to severe consolida­ tion caused by a combination of loading and moisture. Loess is usually thought of as an aeolian material that was deposited thousands of years ago and has remained in place since the time of deposition. Loess that has been eroded and redeposited is often referred to as redeposited loess, reworked loess or more simply as a silt deposit. This implies that the word loess indicates an aeolian soil, undisturbed since deposition. Certain engineering properties of loess, such as shear strength, are quite drastically changed by erosion and redeposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Diminishing Friction of Joint Surfaces As Initiating Factor for Destabilising Permafrost Rocks?
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 12, EGU2010-3440-1, 2010 EGU General Assembly 2010 © Author(s) 2010 Diminishing friction of joint surfaces as initiating factor for destabilising permafrost rocks? Daniel Funk and Michael Krautblatter Department of Geogrpahy, University of Bonn, Germany ([email protected]) Degrading alpine permafrost due to changing climate conditions causes instabilities in steep rock slopes. Due to a lack in process understanding, the hazard is still difficult to asses in terms of its timing, location, magnitude and frequency. Current research is focused on ice within joints which is considered to be the key-factor. Monitoring of permafrost-induced rock failure comprises monitoring of temperature and moisture in rock-joints. The effect of low temperatures on the strength of intact rock and its mechanical relevance for shear strength has not been considered yet. But this effect is signifcant since compressive and tensile strength is reduced by up to 50% and more when rock thaws (Mellor, 1973). We hypotheisze, that the thawing of permafrost in rocks reduces the shear strength of joints by facilitating the shearing/damaging of asperities due to the drop of the compressive/tensile strength of rock. We think, that decreas- ing surface friction, a neglected factor in stability analysis, is crucial for the onset of destabilisation of permafrost rocks. A potential rock slide within the permafrost zone in the Wetterstein Mountains (Zugspitze, Germany) is the basis for the data we use for the empirical joint model of Barton (1973) to estimate the peak shear strength of the shear plane. Parameters are the JRC (joint roughness coefficient), the JCS (joint compressive strength) and the residual friction angle ('r).
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability
    SLOPE STABILITY Chapter 15 Omitted parts: Sections 15.13, 15.14,15.15 TOPICS Introduction Types of slope movements Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis Factor of Safety Stability of Infinite Slopes Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface o Culmann’s Method Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface o Mass Method o Method of Slices TOPICS Introduction Types of slope movements Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis Factor of Safety Stability of Infinite Slopes Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface o Culmann’s Method Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface o Mass Method o Method of Slices SLOPE STABILITY What is a Slope? An exposed ground surface that stands at an angle with the horizontal. Why do we need slope stability? In geotechnical engineering, the topic stability of slopes deals with: 1.The engineering design of slopes of man-made slopes in advance (a) Earth dams and embankments, (b) Excavated slopes, (c) Deep-seated failure of foundations and retaining walls. 2. The study of the stability of existing or natural slopes of earthworks and natural slopes. o In any case the ground not being level results in gravity components of the weight tending to move the soil from the high point to a lower level. When the component of gravity is large enough, slope failure can occur, i.e. the soil mass slide downward. o The stability of any soil slope depends on the shear strength of the soil typically expressed by friction angle (f) and cohesion (c). TYPES OF SLOPE Slopes can be categorized into two groups: A.
    [Show full text]