DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Tense and Aspect in Indo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Tense and Aspect in Indo UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Tense and aspect in Indo-European: A usage-based approach to the verbal systems of the Rigveda and Homer A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies by Ian Benjamin Hollenbaugh 2021 © Copyright by Ian Benjamin Hollenbaugh 2021 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Tense and aspect in Indo-European: A usage-based approach to the verbal systems of the Rigveda and Homer by Ian Benjamin Hollenbaugh Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2021 Professor Stephanie W. Jamison, Chair Though Greek and Sanskrit possess clearly cognate tense–aspect categories, they differ signifi- cantly with respect to the function of these categories. This dissertation investigates the usage of the Aorist and Imperfect indicative in Homeric Greek and Rgvedic Sanskrit, in order to reeval- ˚ uate the functional range of both categories in each language. A qualitative and quantitative examination of the data reveals that the differences in usage between the two languages are only superficial. In Homer as in the Rgveda, the Aorist is commonly used to express perfect as- ˚ pect, while the Imperfect is used to sequence events in past narration. This thesis thus further extends the findings of Hollenbaugh 2018 in proposing that the Aorist and Imperfect do not represent a perfective/imperfective system, nor can they be traced back to such a system in the proto-language, as is often assumed. Rather, they originally marked perfect aspect and a simple past tense respectively. In addition, this dissertation explores the pragmatic interactions across functional categories to explain the lack of application of certain forms in contexts with which they are semantically compatible. The differences in usage observed for the two languages are thus attributed to systematic differences in their respective verb systems overall, rather than to any particular functional innovations per se. The Vedic injunctive and Homeric augmentless forms are also considered, and an account is given of the interaction between the augment and ii the verbal bases with which it combines. This provides insights into why the augment and aug- mentless forms behave differently in the two languages in the way that they do, and suggests how each can be derived from a common source in the proto-language. iii The dissertation of Ian Benjamin Hollenbaugh is approved. David Goldstein Tim Stowell Ashwini Deo Stephanie W. Jamison, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2021 iv For Kristen v TABLE OF CONTENTS General introduction ......................................... 1 Purpose of this dissertation....................................1 Structure of the dissertation....................................2 The matter of meaning: A usage-based approach.......................3 Background and problematization................................8 Overview of verb systems of Greek and Sanskrit........................ 12 Sanskrit verb system..................................... 13 Greek verb system....................................... 17 1 Methodology ............................................ 22 1.1 Texts............................................... 22 1.2 Forms under consideration................................. 24 1.3 Evidence and its assessment: The usage-based approach............... 27 1.4 The role of translation.................................... 31 1.5 Corpora and data collection................................. 32 1.5.1 Corpus annotation in XML............................. 32 1.5.2 Citing frequency data and security of interpretation.............. 35 1.5.3 Secure augmentation................................. 35 1.6 Assessment and interpretation of forms in context................... 37 1.7 Presentation of textual citations.............................. 40 1.8 The notions of regularity and blocking.......................... 41 1.9 The role of frequency data in explaining relative frequency of usage......... 47 1.10 Null hypothesis significance testing............................ 48 vi 1.11 TheIE language family and its proto-stages....................... 48 2 Semantic theory and typology of tense and aspect ...................... 50 2.1 Grams, gram types, and grammaticalization....................... 51 2.2 Time intervals, aspect, and situation types........................ 54 2.2.1 Time intervals..................................... 54 2.2.2 Definitions of tense and aspect categories.................... 57 2.2.3 Assertion time and adverbial expressions..................... 59 2.2.4 Situation types and actionality........................... 60 2.3 “Perfect-like” readings: Theoretical background..................... 61 2.4 Terminative readings: Theoretical background...................... 65 2.5 Imperfective grams: Typology and semantics....................... 68 2.6 Modality: indicatival vs. modal uses of the injunctive.................. 74 I Aorist and Imperfect indicative in Homeric Greek 76 Introduction ............................................ 77 3 The augment in Mycenaean and Homeric Greek ....................... 79 3.1 The augment in Mycenaean................................. 79 3.2 The augment in Homer................................... 84 4 Aorist indicative with and without augment ......................... 98 4.1 “Perfect-like” readings of the Aorist............................ 99 4.2 Terminative readings of the Aorist............................. 105 4.3 Pluractional and modal readings of the Aorist...................... 111 4.4 Functional range of the Homeric Aorist.......................... 120 4.5 Denotation of the Homeric Aorist............................. 124 vii 5 Imperfect with and without augment ............................. 131 5.1 Imperfective readings of the Imperfect.......................... 132 5.2 “Perfect-like” readings of the Imperfect.......................... 135 5.3 Terminative readings of the Imperfect........................... 140 5.4 Pluractional and modal readings of the Imperfect.................... 147 5.5 Functional range of the Homeric Imperfect........................ 152 5.6 Denotation of the Homeric Imperfect........................... 153 6 Comparison of the Homeric Aorist and Imperfect ...................... 155 7 The Perfect and Pluperfect indicative ............................. 160 II Aorist, Imperfect, and injunctive in the Rgveda 164 ˚ Introduction ............................................ 165 8 The augment in the Rgveda .................................... 168 ˚ 8.1 Role of the augment in the Rgveda ............................. 168 ˚ 8.2 Further differences between the use of the augment in Homer and the Rgveda ... 173 ˚ 9 Aorist indicative and Aorist injunctive ............................. 181 9.1 “Perfect-like” readings of the Aorist: Examples & frequency.............. 184 9.2 Terminative readings of the Aorist: Examples & frequency............... 193 9.3 Pluractional and modal readings of the Aorist: Examples & frequency........ 206 9.4 Imperfective readings of the Aorist in the Rgveda(?): Possible examples....... 214 ˚ 9.5 Functional range of the Rgvedic Aorist as compared to Homeric........... 219 ˚ 9.6 Denotation of the Rgvedic Aorist.............................. 225 ˚ 10 Imperfect indicative and Present injunctive ......................... 229 viii 10.1 Imperfective readings of the Present injunctive/Imperfect: Examples & frequency. 230 10.2 “Perfect-like” readings of the Present injunctive/Imperfect: Examples & frequency 238 10.3 Terminative readings of the Present injunctive/Imperfect: Examples & frequency. 247 10.4 Pluractional and modal readings of the Present injunctive/Imperfect: Examples & frequency............................................ 256 10.5 Functional range of the Rgvedic Present injunctive/Imperfect............ 262 ˚ 10.6 Denotation of the Rgvedic Present injunctive/Imperfect................ 265 ˚ 11 Perfect indicative/injunctive and Pluperfect ......................... 268 General conclusion .......................................... 276 References ................................................ 298 ix LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Perfect aspect: resultative/experiential (tE), stative (tE0), and universal (tE00)....... 63 2.2 Concentrative interpretation, past tense........................... 65 2.3 Complexive interpretation, past tense............................. 66 2.4 Inceptive interpretation..................................... 67 2.5 Egressive interpretation..................................... 67 2.6 Progressive/continuous-state and habitual interpretations, past tense (available to Type 1, 2, and 3 imperfectives)......................... 69 2.7 Complexive interpretation, past tense............................. 70 2.8 Concentrative interpretation, past tense........................... 71 9.1 Progressive-like interpretation of perfect(ive) aspect.................... 218 11.1 Most common “perfect-like” interpretations of the Perfect (tE) and Aorist (tE0)..... 271 x LIST OF TABLES 2.1 Semantic weakening of tense–aspect gram types over time................ 54 2.2 Typical “tripartite” perfective/imperfective system..................... 54 2.3 Typology of imperfective grams................................ 69 2.4 Aspectual systems differing by complexive use....................... 72 2.5 Western Slavic aspect....................................... 72 2.6 Homeric aspect.......................................... 73 3.1 Readings of the Aorist with and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finiteverbformationinlycian
    Finite verb formation in Lycian Nils Oscar Paul Billing s2092417 Supervisor: Dr. Alwin Kloekhorst 2nd reader: Dr. Michaël Peyrot Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ResMA Linguistics Specialisation: Indo-European linguistics July 2019 Universiteit Leiden The Netherlands Abstract In this thesis, the finite verb in Lycian is described. All verbal endings and stems are analysed and given both a synchronic description and, to the maximum possible ex- tent, a diachronic explanation. First, all verbal endings are gathered and described both generally and individually. Subsequently, the verbal stems are categorised into types according to stem formant (last segment(s) before the ending) and ending allo- morphy (e.g. lenited vs. unlenited). The last sections are devoted to a detailed individ- ual treatment of all attested Lycian verbal stems. A schema is presented in which the established Lycian stem types are mapped to their original Proto-Indo-European types (section 4.6), e.g. Lyc. s-stems < PIE sḱé/ó-presents. Thereby, a comprehensive model is provided by which the Lycian finite verb may be understood in both its Anatolian and Indo-European context. Acknowledgements My first thanks go out to all the wonderful people at—and affiliated with—LUCL, with whom I have shared so many lovely times and enjoyed an extraordinarily stimulating atmosphere during my two years in Leiden. I am grateful to my supervisor, Dr. Alwin Kloekhorst, for elegantly guiding me along this sometimes winding path. His deep knowledge and display of genuine interest in my ideas have meant a great deal to me as an aspiring scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • BORE ASPECTS OP MODERN GREEK SYLTAX by Athanaaios Kakouriotis a Thesis Submitted Fox 1 the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Of
    BORE ASPECTS OP MODERN GREEK SYLTAX by Athanaaios Kakouriotis A thesis submitted fox1 the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 1979 ProQuest Number: 10731354 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731354 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 II Abstract The present thesis aims to describe some aspects of Mod Greek syntax.It contains an introduction and five chapters. The introduction states the purpose for writing this thesis and points out the fact that it is a data-oriented rather, chan a theory-^oriented work. Chapter one deals with the word order in Mod Greek. The main conclusion drawn from this chapter is that, given the re­ latively rich system of inflexions of Mod Greek,there is a freedom of word order in this language;an attempt is made to account for this phenomenon in terms of the thematic structure. of the sentence and PSP theory. The second chapter examines the clitics;special attention is paid to clitic objects and some problems concerning their syntactic relations .to the rest of the sentence are pointed out;the chapter ends with the tentative suggestion that cli­ tics might be taken care of by the morphologichi component of the grammar• Chapter three deals with complementation;this a vast area of study and-for this reason the analysis is confined to 'oti1, 'na* and'pu' complement clauses; Object Raising, Verb Raising and Extraposition are also discussed in this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • SPLIT-ERGATIVITY in HITTITE Petra Goedegebuure (University of Chicago)
    Published in: Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 270–303, ISSN (Online) 1613-1150, ISSN (Print) 0084-5299, DOI: 10.1515/za- 2012-0015, January 2013 1 SPLIT-ERGATIVITY IN HITTITE Petra Goedegebuure (University of Chicago) “it is possible that all languages show ergativity on some level” (McGregor 2009, 482) 1. Introduction2 As a highly heterogeneous phenomenon ergativity remains a conundrum for linguistic theory. The ergative case has been treated as a structural case, an inherent/lexical case, or rather as a mix (Butt 2006). Split-ergativity is thought to arise as an epiphenomenon, as ‘collateral damage’ of diachronic change after reinterpretation of passive constructions with instrumentals (Dixon 1994) or through reanalysis of transitive null-subject clauses with inanimate instrumentals (Garrett 1990b). Alternatively, case assignment and therefore also split-ergativity ultimately depends on synchronic structural properties of the clause (Merchant 2006). It has been claimed that only 25% of the world’s languages shows ergativity (Van de Visser 2006), or that “all languages show ergativity on some level” (McGregor 2009, 482). Irrespective of the correct ratio, split-ergativity seems to be the norm among languages that show ergativity. When the ergative split is based on semantic features of noun phrases, it is generally assumed that animacy plays a major role. Silverstein (1976) has shown that pronouns and nouns can be hierarchically arranged based on semantic features such as person, number, or grammatical gender. The strength of this hierarchy is that if agent marking is attested for the first time at a certain point in the hierarchy, all nominals lower in the hierarchy will carry agent marking as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Ergativity in Hittite Ilya Yakubovich (Moscow / Oxford)
    1 Ergativity in Hittite Ilya Yakubovich (Moscow / Oxford) 1. Traditional analysis of ēshar and ishanant- ‘blood’. (1) KUB 14.3 iv 52, CTH 181 nu apāt ēshar kuwapi paizz[i] CONN. that.NOM.SG.N. blood.NOM.SG.N where go.3SG.PRES ‘When that blood flows…’ (2) KBo 22.1 24-25, CTH 272 nu ŠA LÚMAŠDA ēshar=set natta sanhiskateni CONN. GEN. poor-man blood=his.ACC.SG.N NEG seek.2PL.PRES ‘You do not seek blood of a poor man’. (3) KUB 14.14 rev. 11, CTH 378 nu KUR URUHatti=ya apās ishananza arha namma zinnesta CONN. land Hattusa=and that.NOM.SG.C blood.NOM.SG.C away also finish.3SG.PRET ‘The blood(shed) further finished off the land of Hattusa as well’. 2. Ergative alignment of neuter nouns in Hittite (SO ≠ A). Subject (eshar) Agent (ishananza) Object (eshar) 3. Forschungsgeschichte of Hittite ergativity. Laroche 1962 established that a grammatically neuter noun cannot function in Hittite as the subject of a transitive verb, but must be replaced by a special form in –anz(a) (/-ants/) in the singular and -antes in the plural. He saw that the distribution of these two markers is functionally similar to that of ergative case endings but nevertheless suggested that their primary function is syntactic. More specifically, he writes: “le suffix -ant- est le marque du transfert d’un inanimé dans la classe animée”. Benveniste 1962 plead for the analysis of -ant- as a derivational morpheme that “animatizes” the base noun. The derivatives in -ant-, according to him, “designeront des notions materielles transferées au rang de puissances actives”.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Conceiving the Middle Voice for Greek and Latin Students Seumas Macdonald
    Re-conceiving the middle voice for Greek and Latin students Seumas Macdonald The following begun as a series of blog posts attempting to summarise and explain the middle voice across Greek and Latin, aimed at teachers and students of the language. It came about as a result of continually needing to explain various points and my own need to systematically read through and think through these issues. Almost entirely, the view expressed in this write-up is that of Suzanne Kemmer, in her key work The Middle Voice, along with R.J. Allen’s 2002 dissertation, “The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek. A study in Polysemy” (since published, but I only have the dissertation version). So, we begin with Suzanne Kemmer, The Middle Voice, which “approaches the middle voice from the perspective of typology and language universals research” (1), and move on to semantic categories, Latin, and deponency. The problem with Greek voice All my problems started, or continue to start with Greek students, and Greek grammars, especially pesky NT Greek ones. NT Greek courses do a particularly bad job at the nuances of Greek, I find. So, students are very often taught, or at least end up with, a view of Greek that is: Active: I hit Mike. Passive: Mike is hit by me. Middle: “something vaguely in the middle where I am benefited by hitting Mike” This is usually a very English (vel sim) -driven view, in that the middle is an awkward third- voice squished between the Active and Passive. Two things, in my own long growth in Greek knowledge, helped get over this.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Seminars Number 2
    oi.uchicago.edu i THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE SEMINARS NUMBER 2 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban oi.uchicago.edu ii oi.uchicago.edu iii MARGINS OF WRITING, ORIGINS OF CULTURES edited by SETH L. SANDERS with contributions by Seth L. Sanders, John Kelly, Gonzalo Rubio, Jacco Dieleman, Jerrold Cooper, Christopher Woods, Annick Payne, William Schniedewind, Michael Silverstein, Piotr Michalowski, Paul-Alain Beaulieu, Theo van den Hout, Paul Zimansky, Sheldon Pollock, and Peter Machinist THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE SEMINARS • NUMBER 2 CHICAGO • ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu iv Library of Congress Control Number: 2005938897 ISBN: 1-885923-39-2 ©2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2006. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago Co-managing Editors Thomas A. Holland and Thomas G. Urban Series Editors’ Acknowledgments The assistance of Katie L. Johnson is acknowledged in the production of this volume. Front Cover Illustration A teacher holding class in a village on the Island of Argo, Sudan. January 1907. Photograph by James Henry Breasted. Oriental Institute photograph P B924 Printed by McNaughton & Gunn, Saline, Michigan The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Infor- mation Services — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. oi.uchicago.edu v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Until' and 'Before' Clauses: Zooming in on Linguistic Diversity
    BALTIC LINGUISTICS ISSN 2081- 9 (2018), 141–2 ‘As long as’, ‘until’ and ‘before’ clauses: Zooming in on linguistic diversity Be W Stockholm University This paper investigates ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses in the Baltic languages in their wider areal and genealogical context in a sample of 2 modern and ancient doculects of European and Indo-European languages. In a bottom-up construction of the semantic map of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ connectors from parallel text data, a fourth cluster intermediate between ‘before’ and ‘until’ with negative main clauses is identified. The typology resulting from the different overlaps of clusters locates Baltic languages in an intermediate zone between Western, Eastern, and Northern European languages. This goes hand-in-hand with a high diversity of Baltic languages in their typology of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses. The temporal connectors found in Baltic varieties can be classified according to whether they originate from strategies expressing temporal identity (simultaneity) or non-identity (non-simultaneity). Many connectors in Baltic derive from correlative constructions and originally express iden- tity, but can then shift from simultaneity towards posteriority as they gradually lose their association with correlative constructions. Since temporal clauses are never at- emporal and are hence incompatible with permanent states and since negation often expresses permanent states, negation—a marker of non-identity—is prone to develop non-polarity functions in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses. The Baltic and Slavic languages are rich in various kinds of expanded negation (translation equivalents in other languages lack negation) and expletive negation (negation does not have the function of expressing negative polarity) in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Summer School in Languages and Linguistics 2021, July 12-23
    Program Summer School in Languages and Linguistics 2021, July 12-23 Slot 9.30–11.00 11.30–13.00 14.30–16.00 16.30–18.00 Chinese program Chinese historical Chao now: Reading Modern Uyghur: phonology and Sino- Yuen Ren Chao's work Grammar, history, and Tibetan comparative in the 21st century reading (Kontovas) linguistics (Hill) (Wiedenhof) Descriptive Clause combining in Tone analysis (Rapold) The art of grammar Linguistics languages of the writing (Mous) program Americas (Kohlberger) Language Fieldwork technology ELAN, Praat, and FLEx Working with com- Researching oral tradi- Documentation (Griscom) (Harvey) munities (Harvey) tion (Zuyderhoudt) Germanic Germanic etymology Old Frisian (Bremmer) Old English (Porck) Old Saxon (Quak) program (Schuhmann) Indo-European Introduction to Hittite Avestan linguistics and Old English (Porck) Historical linguistics program I (Vertegaal) OR: philology from compa- (van Putten) Introduction to rative Indo-European Mycenaean (van Beek) perspective (Sadovski) Indo-European Anatolian historical Advanced Indo- Indo-European sacred The archaeology of program II grammar (Kloekhorst) European phonology texts, myth, and ritual Indo-European origins (Lubotsky and Pronk) (Sadovski) (Anthony) Indology program Vedic poetry (Knobl) Vedic prose (Knobl) Kādambarīkathāsāra Kaviśikṣā, manuals by Abhinanda for aspiring poets (Isaacson) (Isaacson) Iranian program Modern Persian Avestan linguistics and Introduction to Introduction to (Zolfaghari) philology from compa- Buddhist Sogdian Bactrian (Durkin- rative Indo-European
    [Show full text]
  • In Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek
    Two types of passive? Voice morphology and “low passives” in Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek Laura Grestenberger University of Vienna Abstract This paper discusses passivization in Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek, two ancient Indo-European languages. These languages have two different types of syn- thetic passive: the inflectional passive, which expresses passivization by selecting a specific set of nonactive (“middle”) endings, and the derivational passive, which uses a specifically passive suffix, to which inflectional endings expressing Tense, Aspect, and Voice are then added. While the inflectional passive in both languages can be analyzed along the lines proposed by Alexiadou et al. 2015 for Modern Greek pas- sives, the main focus of this paper is on the derivational passives and their apparent “double marking” of Voice (via a designated suffix and via the inflectional endings). I argue that the suffix of the derivational passive is a diachronically reanalyzed in- choative v head that turned into a “low” passive head, providing further evidence for the cross-linguistic parametrization of passive morphosyntax. 1 Introduction The cross-linguistic variation in passive constructions discussed in the literature (e.g., the surveys in Shibatani 1988, Fox and Hopper 1994, Abraham and Leisiö 2006, Alexiadou and Schäfer 2013a, etc.) raises the question of which properties of passives are universal, and why. The goal of this paper is to contribute to the question of the internal structure and morphosyntax of passives and the passive/inchoative syncretism based on evidence from two non-informant languages, Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek. I argue that these languages provide additional evidence for the idea that passivization can operate at different “heights” along the verbal spine.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Hittite Language
    the Changes from PIE to Anatolian and from An OverviewAnatolian of the to Hittite Hittite, Language, and a Brief History of the Hittite People A.J. Gregoritsch IV The Hittite Language ●Hittite, probably originally called nešili after the city of Neša (sometimes also called Aniša and originally named Kaneš), is an extinct Indo- European language of the Anatolian branch. ●It was spoken by an Indo-European people who at one time controlled much of what is now turkey and Syria. Notable Features of the Language ●Word order is typically SOV. ●It has split ergative alignment. ●Hittite, like PIE, had postpositions. ●Modifiers, including subordinate clauses, typically precede what they modify. ●Sentences and clauses usually begin with a chain of fixed-order clitics. From PIE to Common Anatolian ●Stops: ● Voiced aspirated stops lost their aspiration and merged with the plain voiced stops. – *bh, *b > *b – *dh, *d > *d – *gh, *g > *g – *ǵh, *ǵ > *ǵ – *gwh, *gw > *gw ● This would seem to be a change from the original PIE distinction between voiceless, voiced and voiced aspirated to a new From PIE to Common Anatolian ●Laryngeals: ● Scholars generally agree that *h2 was preserved as a consonant, and it is probable that *h3 was also preserved, though this is disputed. The two also seem to have merged into a single consonant, though there is some small evidence of a possible conditional split w of *h2 into *H and *H . – *h2, *h3 > *H w – also possibly: *h2w, *h2u > *H ● The outcome of *h1 appears to be the same as in the other branches. From PIE to Common
    [Show full text]
  • A GRAMMAR of MODERN INDO-EUROPEAN Any Particular Tense
    7. VERBS 7.1. INTRODUCTION 7.1.1. VOICE, MOOD, TENSE, PERSON, NUMBER 1. The inflection of the Verb is called its Conjugation. 2. Through its conjugation the Verb expresses Voice, Mood, Tense, Person and Number. 3. The Voices are two: Active and Middle (or Middle-Passive). 4. The Moods were up to five: Indicative (plain statement of objective fact) and Imperative (commands) are the oldest ones, while the Optative (intentions or hoped for action) is from Late PIE, and still more recent the Subjunctive (potentiality, possibility); an Injunctive (perhaps mild commands or prohibitions) is also reconstructed. 5. The General Tenses are three, viz.: a. The Present. b. The Past or Preterite. c. The Future. NOTE. The Future Stem is generally believed to have appeared in Late PIE, not being able to spread to some dialects before the general split of the proto-languages; the distinction between a Present and a Future tense, however, is common to all IE languages. 6. The Aspects were up to three: a. For continued, not completed action, the Present. b. For the state derived from the action, the Perfect. c. For completed action, the Aorist. NOTE 1. There is some confusion on whether the Aorist (from Gk. αοριστος, “indefinite or unlimited”) is a tense or an aspect. This reflects the double nature of the aorist in Ancient Greek. In the indicative, the Ancient Greek aorist represents a combination of tense and aspect: past tense, perfective aspect. In other moods (subjunctive, optative and imperative), however, as well as in the infinitive and (largely) the participle, the aorist is purely aspectual, with no reference to A GRAMMAR OF MODERN INDO-EUROPEAN any particular tense.
    [Show full text]
  • Computerized Hittite Cuneiform Sign Recognition and Knowledge-Based System Application Examples
    European Scientific Journal November 2019 edition Vol.15, No.33 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Computerized Hittite Cuneiform Sign Recognition and Knowledge-Based System Application Examples A. Ziya Aktas, Prof. Dr., Beste Yesiltepe, M.S., Tunc Asuroglu, M.S., Baskent University-Ankara, Turkey Doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n33p32 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n33p32 Abstract The Hittites had lived in Anatolia more than 4000 years ago. The Hittite language is one of the oldest and may be the only one still readable and grammar rules are known member of Indo-European language family. The Hittites had a cuneiform script of their own written on soft clay pads or tablets. Tablets made durable and permanent by baking them after writing with some tools. That is why they could endure for thousands of years buried in the ground. The study of Hittite language has been made manually on the Hittite cuneiform tablets. Unfortunately, field scientists have read and translated only a relatively small number of unearthed tablets. Many more tablets are still waiting under and over ground in Anatolia for reading and translation into various languages. To read and translate the cuneiform signs, using computer- aided techniques would be a significant contribution not only to Anatolian and Turkish but also to human history. In this paper, recognition of Hittite cuneiform signs by using computer based image-processing techniques is reported. Additionally, uses of data-mining applications are also included in the paper. Most importantly, the authors also demonstrated feasibility of an expert system on the Hittite cuneiform scripts.
    [Show full text]