DOCSLIB.ORG

Abc Submission to Inquiry Into the Uptake of Digital Television in Australia by Standing Committee on Communications, Informat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abc Submission to Inquiry Into the Uptake of Digital Television in Australia by Standing Committee on Communications, Informat Australian Broadcasting Corporation submission to Convergence Review Committee Framing Paper June 2011 ABC submission on the Convergence Review Framing Paper Introduction The ABC welcomes the opportunity to comment on the framing principles for the Convergence Review. As the review panel states in its Framing Paper, convergence is now a fact of life in the media and communications environment. It has been a reality for the national public broadcaster over the past few years. In fulfilling its Charter obligation to provide “innovative and comprehensive broadcasting”, the ABC has vigorously pursued the challenges and opportunities offered by new technology and new platforms to better serve its audiences and to respond to their changing expectations and demands. The ABC has embraced the digital age, creating the children’s service ABC3 and ABC News 24 on television and a suite of new radio channels, like ABC Dig Music, ABC Grandstand and ABC Extra. In recognition of the consumer appetite for on-demand content, the Corporation launched iView, Australia’s first and most popular catch-up TV service, with more than one million monthly visitors. ABC radio was a pioneer in podcasting and now registers more than 4.7 million downloads per month. The ABC’s mobile applications, including those for the iPad and iPhone, have generated strong demand. Innovative multi- media content like the award winning Gallipoli, the first day have showcased the educational opportunities of the online platform, as has the Reading Eggs educational service, operated by ABC Commercial. The Corporation has also led the way in social media, connecting with both loyal and new audiences with the diverse and highly effective collection of presences it has established across multiple platforms. It is widely recognised that the various technological changes which underpin convergence are challenging both the business models of the traditional communications players and the regulatory arrangements imposed by governments. The Principles The Review Panel’s approach of identifying the key objectives of communications policy is a critical first step in designing an appropriate framework for this new and evolving marketplace. The ABC believes that the principles provide a sound platform for media and communications regulation in a converged environment. Technology has transformed the means of delivering content. It follows that platform-based regulatory frameworks need to be re-examined. However, the Review needs to acknowledge, that while technological change may challenge regulatory structures, this does not mean that the policy objectives that underpin those structures are no longer relevant. 1 Submission on Convergence Review Framing Paper 2 The Corporation does not advocate any amendment of the Principles. However, it believes that it is important that the Principles are interpreted in a way that broadly recognises both the traditional understanding of the objectives of policy and also the dynamic nature of the modern media. Access The concept of access is central to Principles 1, 3 and 4. There are clear public benefits flowing from the ubiquitous availability of a comprehensive national broadcaster. The ABC reaches all Australians regardless of geographic or economic circumstances. It has a presence on all major delivery platforms, ensuring that all citizens can participate in the national debate. It is at the heart of the ABC’s Charter that the services it provides are a public good which should be available to all Australians. In the Australian context, the objective of ensuring access to local content, diverse voices and views, and news and information of relevance to the local community has always meant “access for all”, not simply access to those who wish or can afford to pay for it. Policy settings in this area need to ensure that desired outcomes are not achieved by simply setting in place access to a platform. For example, if consumers are to access high-quality Australian drama, there must be an ecology and an infrastructure, managed with appropriate policy settings, to generate that drama content in the first place. The current system of content quotas for commercial television ensures a demand for local content production which supports a competitive and vibrant production industry. It also guarantees minimum levels of output. Similarly, direct funding to the national broadcasters for drama production has also played a key role in stimulating the creative sector. Australia is moving into an environment where a vast amount of foreign-produced content will be easily accessible to consumers on demand. New platforms and increasing content choices are fragmenting audiences and weakening the business models that have supported the production and distribution of local content. In this context, Principle 3 should be seen to encompass policies designed to facilitate the development of the cultural and creative industries necessary to achieve the objective of ensuring that Australians continue to have access to diverse and high-quality local content. Currently this objective is met through a variety of content quotas and incentives such as the Producer Offset. An examination of the appropriateness of this mix will need to be a key feature of the Review. In a wider sense, it is important that the Principles recognise that, in the converged media environment, users are not just passive content consumers, but potential content creators and Submission on Convergence Review Framing Paper 3 contributors. Principle 1, in particular, must interpret access as encompassing the right of citizens to participate in this way. The ABC is using digital technology to facilitate two-way conversations with the public through projects like ABC Open and the innovative use of a Twitter feed on Q&A. Literacy The technological changes driving convergence mean that digital media literacy is becoming increasingly important for participation in all aspects of society.1 The ability to access diverse voices, views and information is dependent on a citizen’s capacity to engage with new technology. The ABC believes that the promotion and development of digital media literacy should be an important policy objective. In addition to Principle 1, the ABC believes that the promotion of digital literacy should be seen to be within the scope of Principles 5 and 7. Local News The ABC endorses Principle 4, which highlights the importance of local news. The delivery of comprehensive and impartial news is critical to the democratic process. The ABC is proud of the fact that it has a key role in delivering local news from 60 regional and metropolitan sites across Australia, speaking directly to audiences across the continent. It is important to recognise that “news” has a qualitative dimension and that consumers recognise that not all news is equal. Recent research by Essential Media found that Australians regard ABC Television and Radio news as significantly more trustworthy than commercial and subscription services.2 While blogs and social media are welcome additional news sources and provide forums in which to facilitate public debate, their presence does not obviate the need for well-resourced and comprehensive public broadcasting. Copyright Principle 6 states that Australians should have access to the broadest range of content across platforms and services as possible. The ABC believes that the application of this Principle will require the Panel to examine the application of copyright law to the new media environment. 1 The ACMA has defined the concept of digital literacy as the ability to access, understand and participate or create content using digital media. 2 Essential Report, 2 May 2011. Submission on Convergence Review Framing Paper 4 As the ABC noted in its submission on the terms of reference, like the Broadcasting Service Act, the Copyright Act does not adequately take into account new technology and delivery mechanisms. This can lead to uncertainties in the exploitation of rights using converged technologies. These uncertainties have the potential to retard the development of new services and business models for the distribution of digital content in a converged environment. Other countries are already grappling with this challenge. For example, the United Kingdom has recently completed a review of its copyright laws which found that copyright law had started to act as a regulatory barrier to the creation of new internet based business.3 Issues arising from the Principles The Framing Paper invites stakeholders to identify the significant issues arising from the Principles. While the list below is not exhaustive, the ABC believes that the following questions represent key issues to be tackled by the Convergence Review. The ABC acknowledges that some of these matters fall outside of its direct concern. • What media ownership rules are appropriate in the converged media environment (Principle 1)? • What sort of licensing regime(s) should apply to media services (Principle 2)? • Are existing levels of Australian content adequate (Principle 3)? • What are the appropriate tools to achieve access to Australian content (Principle 3)? • How should Australian content be defined? Should it include User-Generated Content? (Principle 3)? • How should access to local news be provided (Principle 4)? • How should classification standards be applied to content (Principle 5)? • Are copyright reforms needed to facilitate multi-platform, anytime digital content distribution (Principle 6)? • Should ISPs be able to prioritize data they carry on the basis of content or source (Principle 7)? • How should spectrum be allocated and planned for broadcasting and other communications services (Principle 8)? The ABC understands that the appropriate policy responses to these issues will be canvassed in the consultation process that will follow the emerging issues paper and a discussion paper. The Corporation looks forward to engaging with the Panel as the Review progresses. 3 Professor Ian Hargreaves, ‘Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth’, May 2011. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Media and Indigenous Policy
    The Media and Indigenous Policy How news media reporting and mediatized practice impact on Indigenous policy A preliminary report Copyright © Kerry McCallum, Michael Meadows, Lisa Waller, Michelle Dunne Breen, Holly Reid, 2012 ISBN: 9781740883658 Editor: Associate Professor Kerry McCallum, Journalism & Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts & Design, University of Canberra Editorial Assistant: Monica Andrew Contributors: Kerry McCallum Michael Meadows Lisa Waller Michelle Dunne Breen Holly Reid Further information about the Australian News Media and Indigenous Policy-making 1988-2008 project is available at http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/research/active- research-groups/public-communication/Indigenous-Policymaking This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (DP0987457), with additional funding supplied by the Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra. ii Contents Acknowledgements v Executive summary vii Researchers ix Introduction 1 Media reporting and Indigenous policymaking 3 Kerry McCallum Policymaker perspectives 11 Managing the optics of Indigenous policy 13 Kerry McCallum & Lisa Waller When the stars align 23 Michael Meadows Media perspectives 33 Indigenous health reporting 1988–2008 34 Framing Indigenous Health, 1988–1995 37 Kerry McCallum Practice imperfect: media, discourse and intervention 43 Michelle Dunne-Breen Journalists, ‘remote’ Indigenous sources and cultural competence 51 Lisa Waller From little things big things grow: campaigning journalism
    [Show full text]
  • Countdown and Cult Music Television Programmes
    Giuffre, Liz Countdown and Cult Music Television Programmes Countdown and cult music television programmes: an Australian case study Liz Giuffre Abstract Music television programs, programs that focus on music for their core content, have been produced all over the world for all types of markets. However there remains little sustained work on them beyond studies of key production periods, franchise waves or biography-like narratives. This article shows that theories of Cult TV can be applied to music television programs to help explore this neglected form, as well as helping to expand Cult TV’s theoretical reach beyond its traditional fare of narrative driven, fiction series. This article offers 1970s and ‘80s Australian music television program Countdown as a prime example of Cult TV, first in the context of its initial production and consumption in 1970s and ‘80s Australia, and also in terms of its subsequent influence on contemporary audiences from a historical perspective. The Cult TV frame extends to the program itself in its original incarnation, as well as additional recontextualisations in new music television programs, and the continued work of its former host, Ian ‘Molly’ Meldrum. Introduction1 Music television is an unusual type of programming. It provides both regular entertainment that is watched intensely while on air, and produces key moments that survive well in audience collective memory. ‘Live’ music performance and interview series Countdown remains an icon of the Australian television and music industries.2 Created by the national public service broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC),3 the show was broadcast from 1974 to 1987 on Sunday evenings and was highly influential with television audiences and the broader music industry.4 Countdown provided opportunities for music artists and audiences to engage with each other in a way that had not previously been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Koori Engagement with Television by Gary Foley ©
    Koori Engagement with Television by Gary Foley © In 1973 when television in Australia was still broadcast in black and white, the opening line of the first ever all-Aboriginal TV show was, "Welcome to colour television." Thus began the first attempt by indigenous Australians to come to terms with the advent of television into their world. For the Kooris television was always going to be far more problematic than for the white, Anglo-Celtic majority in Australia who already had been conditioned by the affluence and consumerist ideology and conceptual preparation transmitted to society through radio in the post- war era. In this essay I will explore indigenous community engagement with, and response to, the advent of television and subsequent attempts to both control and/or subvert the intent of television manufacturers and programmers. I will examine whether or not Aboriginal 'communities' in south-east Australia have succeeded in their efforts to limit what they perceive to be the culturally destructive effects of television in their respective communities. In Australia television was introduced around the country throughout the 1950s and 60s. The nation had been thoroughly prepared for the advent of television by massive publicity campaigns in the press and on the radio. Furthermore, radio had conditioned "white" Australia to naturalise concepts of modernity, domestic space and mass consumption, and thus prepared them for television's introduction. The fact that television programming (by virtue of its then predominantly American origin) communicated to the then patriarchal, white, nuclear family made it even easier for the dominant ideology in Australia to adjust.
    [Show full text]
  • Reddin Antisiphoning Fullpaper NEW.Pages
    53 • Platform: Journal of Media and Communication Volume 8.2, ANZCA Special Issue (2017): 53-67. Cultural Citizenship, Social Utility, and Positive Network Externalities: The Role of Anti-Siphoning Legislation Edward Reddin – University of Newcastle [email protected] Rowe suggests that televised sport plays a substantial role in facilitating participation in a nation’s culture (2004b). This sentiment is arguably more pronounced here in Australia than anywhere else in the world—our broadcasting legislation contains provisions ensuring that free-to-air broadcasters get priority when acquiring the rights of “events of national importance and cultural significance”(Australian Government, 2017, p. 1). This provision lists some 1300 protected events; all exclusively sport. However, many comparable countries list approximately 100 events, which include non-sport events. Given that the Australian Football League (AFL) is clearly identifiable as an Australian game and part of Australian culture, making this code widely accessible is evidently a necessary requirement for cultural participation. Yet, the free-to-air broadcasting market often fails to fulfil this obligation. Despite the fact that approximately $900 million was paid for the most recent round of free-to-air AFL broadcasting rights (Mason and Stensholt, 2015), evidence suggests that there is a considerable disparity in AFL viewing opportunities in the free-to-air market. While this situation would appear to erode the public access remit that sport has historically supported, of more concern is that current regulatory arrangements appear to normalise such an outcome. The concepts of cultural citizenship, social utility, and positive network externality suggest that, in an ideal world, all games should be freely available to all citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Television in Australia
    Digital Television in Australia 2002 Industry Survey Prepared for the Australian Broadcasting Authority by Duane Varan & Tim Morrison Interactive Television Research Institute, Murdoch University Australian Broadcasting Authority Sydney February 2003 Disclaimer This report has been undertaken by the Interactive Television Research Institute (ITRI), with financial support from the Australian Broadcasting Authority. The findings and views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect those of the ABA. The findings in this report are based on information gathered in good faith. Neither ITRI nor the ABA assume any liability for any actions taken based on the findings of this report. © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 This work is copyright. Apart from fair dealings for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means or process, without the written permission of the publishers. Published by the Australian Broadcasting Authority 201 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australian Broadcasting Authority ii Contents BACKGROUND 1 Digital television 1 The study 1 The iTV value chain 4 Digital drivers / inhibitors 7 RESULTS 9 Survey results 9 Digital penetration 11 Digital drivers 16 Inhibitors 23 Advertising drivers 25 Drivers and inhibitors compared 28 Government assistance 30 Information needs 31 IMPLICATIONS 33 Survey implications 33 CONCLUSION 37 APPENDIX A 39 Organisations represented at Delphi retreat 39 APPENDIX B 40 Organisations represented in industry survey 40 Australian Broadcasting Authority iii About the authors Duane Varan is the director of the Interactive Television Research Institute based at Murdoch University where he holds the Foundation Chair in New Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Introduction.Pdf
    School of Social Sciences FROM PRODUCTION HOUSES TO RELAY STATIONS A SOCIAL HISTORY OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION IN PERTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA With special reference to the years 1958 –1990 PETER HARRIES March 2004 This thesis is presented as part of the requirements for the award of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy of the Curtin University of Technology ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any Degree. It is the result of my own independent research, and all sources that have been consulted are acknowledged in the bibliography. …………………………….. iii ABSTRACT The thesis examines the continuing interaction of local ‘live’ production, audience ratings, financial returns and managerial attitudes to community responsibility during the first thirty- two years of commercial television in Western Australia. It is argued that during this nperiod the nature of commercial Western Australian television companies changed dramatically. From being creative production houses, developing their own local ‘live’ content programs, they have become mere relay houses relying almost entirely on programs developed in other parts of Australia and overseas. The local ‘live’ part of television was born of the necessity to provide program content at little cost, grew as part of a perceived community responsibility by the television stations and was fostered by their competition. Its demise was due to misplaced Federal Government regulation, technological changes, networking and a diminution in community responsibility engendered
    [Show full text]
  • At Any Time in Any Place in Any Situation
    in any place at any time in any situation Annual Report2005 Australian Broadcasting Corporation ABC services of all Australians via reached an estimated75% television, radio and online There are now 1.7 million pages of information rich ABC Online content at www.abc.net.au ABC radio weekly metropolitan audience reach 3.766 millionor 34% ABC weekly metropolitan reach of TV8.8 million or 64.2% and weekly regional reach of 3.9 million or 62.6% ABC Online reaches 14.4% of Australia’s active Internet population 90% of Australians continue to believe the ABC provides a valuable service to the community. 1 New Australian-made TV programs launched include Spicks and Specks, Talking Heads, How The Quest Was Won, Beat The Chef, Collectors, Second Opinion, Blue Water High and Outback House We launched digital radio services digJAZZ and digCOUNTRY Radio Australia now available via 200 local re-broadcasters in 40 countries, shortwave broadcasts, satellite services and a 24-hour FM network ABC2 was launched... the ABC’s second free-to-air digital television channel ABC Asia Pacific television is seen in 39 countries, retransmitted by 155 pay-TV operators, in more than 200 000 hotel rooms and available in 9 million homes ABC produced 4 476 hours of Australian television content, including more than 2 221 hours of news and current affairs 40 ABC Shops and 79 ABC Centres through out Australia and online generated $10.6 million net profit which was returned to programming last year ABC had total revenues of $959m from ordinary activities with $1.026 billion in total assets 2 abc any time | any place reaches australians radio television online shops international broadcasting 3 Annual Report 2004–05 Radio The ABC has four national radio networks —Radio National, ABC Classic FM, triple j and ABC NewsRadio—as well as 60 Local Radio stations around Australia, and three Internet music-based services, dig, digJAZZ and digCOUNTRY.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport on Television: to Siphon Or Not to Siphon?
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 11 February 2010, no. 14, 2009–10, ISSN 1834-9854 Sport on television: to siphon or not to siphon? Dr Rhonda Jolly Social Policy Section Executive summary • Siphoning refers to the practice used by pay television broadcasters by which they appropriate, or ‘siphon off’ certain events that have been traditionally shown on free-to-air television so that viewers who do not subscribe to their services are unable to view those events. • Australia’s free-to-air broadcasters lobbied government extensively to ensure that a list of programs which could not be siphoned by pay television was in place to coincide with the introduction of pay television in the mid 1990s. The list detailed events that can not be shown on pay television until telecast rights have first been acquired by a free-to-air broadcaster. • Pay television operators initially objected to the introduction of an anti siphoning list on the grounds that it would inhibit the development of pay television. • The list has undergone considerable review since its introduction. This has resulted in some minor changes, but a list, per se, appears to be entrenched firmly as part of the media landscape in Australia. • Arguments surrounding the maintenance of the list have been consistent. Free-to-air broadcasters claim that the list serves the public interest, and therefore it should be maintained. Pay television operators oppose the list, which they argue serves the interest of free-to-air broadcasters, not the public.
    [Show full text]
  • A U S T R a L I a N B R O a D C a S T I N G a U T H O R I TY Annual Report
    Introduction A U S T R A L I A N B R O A D C A S T I N G A U T H O R I TY annual report Sydney 1997 1 Annual Report 1996-97 © Commonwealth of Australia, 1997 ISSN 1320-2863 Design by Media and Public Relations Australian Broadcasting Authority Printed in Australia by Printing Headquarters, Broadway, NSW 2008 For inquiries about this report, contact: Publications Officer Australian Broadcasting Authority at address below For inquiries about information to be made available to Members of Parliament and Senators on request, contact: Director Corporate Services Branch Australian Broadcasting Authority at address below For inquiries relating to Freedom of Information, contact: FOI Officer Australian Broadcasting Authority Level 15, 201 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 Ph. (02) 9334 7700 Fax: (02) 9334 7799 Postal address: PO Box Q500 Queen Victoria Building NSW 1230 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.dca.gov.au/aba/hpcov.htm 2 Introduction Reserved for letter of transmission 3 Annual Report 1996-97 4 Introduction Table of contents Page no. Letter of transmission 3 Introduction to the report 7 The year in review 8 Corporate overview 16 Performance reporting: Objective 1 — Expert advice 23 International liaison 24 Advice to the government 30 Digital terrestrial television broadcasting 30 Digital radio broadcasting 31 The sixth television channel 32 External liaison 34 Objective 2 — Planning the spectrum 45 Final licence area plans – radio 46 Final licence area plans – television 53 Objective 3 — Licence allocations 56 Allocation of commercial
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Regional Commercial Television Ownership and Control
    Station Break: A History of Regional Commercial Television Ownership and Control Michael Thurlow B. Journalism This thesis is presented for the degree of Master of Research Macquarie University Department of Media, Music, Communication and Cultural Studies 9 October 2015 This page has been left blank deliberately. Table of contents Abstract .................................................... i Statement of Candidate .................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................... iv Abbreviations ............................................... v Figures ................................................... vii Tables ................................................... viii Introduction ................................................ 1 Chapter 1: New Toys for Old Friends ........................ 21 Chapter 2: Regulatory Foundations and Economic Imperatives . 35 Chapter 3: Corporate Ambitions and Political Directives .... 57 Chapter 4: Digital Protections and Technical Disruptions ... 85 Conclusion ................................................ 104 Appendix A: Stage Three Licence Grants .................... 111 Appendix B: Ownership Groups 1963 ......................... 113 Appendix C: Stage Four Licence Grants ..................... 114 Appendix D: Ownership Groups 1968 ......................... 116 Appendix E: Stage Six Licence Grants ...................... 117 Appendix F: Ownership Groups 1975 ......................... 118 Appendix G: Ownership Groups 1985 ......................... 119 Appendix H:
    [Show full text]
  • 'Laughs and Legends,' Or the Furniture That Glows? Television As History?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queensland University of Technology ePrints Archive QUT Digital Repository: http;;//eprints.qut.edu.au Hartley, John and Burgess, Jean E. and Green, Joshua B. (2007) 'Laughs and Legends,' or the Furniture That Glows? Television as History? . Australian Cultural History 26:pp. 15-36. © Copyright 2007 John Hartley, Jean E. Burgess and Joshua B. Green ‘LAUGHS AND LEGENDS,’ OR THE FURNITURE THAT GLOWS? TELEVISION AS HISTORY JOHN HARTLEY JOSHUA GREEN JEAN BURGESS CCI Paper for AUSTRALIAN CULTURAL HISTORY © The authors, all rights reserved 1 1. Introduction: Television as History 2006 marks the fiftieth anniversary of broadcast television in Australia. It was launched in Sydney and Melbourne in 1956, just in time for the Melbourne Olympic Games. This anniversary has provoked a flurry of events, including a national conference, a number of exhibitions, and a spate of celebratory television specials and newspaper articles. Now seems a particularly fruitful time, then, to look at the ways in which television itself has become a historical object; to consider some of the ways in which television is memorialised. This paper is concerned not so much with the events of this history as much as with the way in which it is written; with television as history rather than the history of television. Television as history can be distinguished from histories of things on or about television, such as programs, broadcasters, genres, technology, policy, audience and the like. Particular historical studies are not uncommon, but if you wanted to explain to someone what constitutes our discipline’s major object of study, you would be hard put to identify a work that tackled that job as history.1 Media, cultural and television studies routinely construct television within the endless present tense of science, policy, journalism and critique.
    [Show full text]
  • Television 2025: Rethinking Small-Screen Media in Australia, Swinburne Institute for Social Research, 2015
    TELEVISION 20 QUESTIONS 202 5 25 VIEWPOINTS Rethinking small-screen media in Australia Spreading Fictions: Distributing Stories in the Online Age is an Australian Research Council funded Linkage Project [LP100200656] supported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and Screen Australia. The chief investigators are Jock Given, Professor of Media and Communications, The Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne and Gerard Goggin, Professor of Media and Communications, The University of Sydney. Partner Investigators: Georgie McClean, Head of Strategy and Communications, Screen Australia Rebecca Heap, Head of TV Strategy & Digital Products, ABC TV This report was written by Jock Given, Michael Brealey and Cathy Gray, from interviews conducted by Michael Brealey and Jock Given. Rosemary Curtis provided research assistance. Many thanks to the ABC, Screen Australia and the Australian Research Council for their generous support of the project and to all the interviewees for their contributions to this report. Any views expressed in this report are those of the authors and interviewees and not necessarily those of the Industry Partners or other organisations. Publication editing and page layout: Cathy Gray Cover design: Screen Australia Published by Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218 Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122 The text in this report is released subject to a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND licence (Licence). This means, in summary, that you may reproduce, transmit and distribute the text, provided that you do not do so for commercial purposes, and provided that you attribute the text as extracted from Television 2025: Rethinking Small-screen Media in Australia, Swinburne Institute for Social Research, 2015.
    [Show full text]