DOCSLIB.ORG

Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms Infectionvectors.Com June 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms Infectionvectors.Com June 2005 Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms infectionvectors.com June 2005 Overview Instant Messaging (IM) has rapidly gained popularity, making it an attractive medium for malware coders. However, without the universal interoperation of email, instant messaging worms have so far been much slower to propagate and gain widespread success compared to their SMTP-based cousins. As such, the amount of attention (and development) they have received from malware authors is significantly less than the mass mailer worms. Nonetheless, IM-based malware is a threat to all organizations and should be addressed by both policy and technical safeguards. IM-founded malware carries the same potential for compromising data as any other malcode (and has adopted the tactics of more successful varieties exceptionally quickly). This paper examines the development and importance of IM worms. Messaging Overview Instant messaging generically refers to real-time text communications between two or more clients (although, it is important to note many new services such as video and voice are available through these clients). Generally, messages are passed from a client to a server and vice versa. Some IM clients are capable of transmitting files between one another without a central server (once a communications channel is established) and can allow for a remarkable degree of command execution. This is represented simply below: Messaging Server Presence data transferred to clients from servers. Message/file transfer. Compatible Clients Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms 2 IM protocols range from relatively simple to quite complex and generally include some form of “presence” detection and notification (the ability to indicate whether a contact is online at any given time). Some examples of IM protocols: • Bonjour (Apple) • IRC (Jarkko Oikarinen) • Jabber (Jeremie Miller) • Meetro (Meetroduction) • .NET/MSN (Microsoft) • OSCAR (AOL) • Yahoo MSG (Yahoo) From the list above, 4 major IM applications exist today (in terms of use): MSN/.NET Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), and ICQ. With the exception of IRC and Jabber, these are all proprietary protocols, using clients that do not interoperate. For malware researchers, this is an important point, as the bulk of viruses are written for “popular” platforms/applications. Effectively, that means that until an application is in widespread use, it is likely to be ignored by most malware authors. Note: The term “Instant Messenger” itself belongs to Time Warner-AOL; as such only the AOL-branded software carries the name.1 Using IM applications as a propagation medium is a worthwhile endeavor for many worm creators since the respective client software works almost identically on various operating systems. In addition, the family of code is very much like mass mailers as this paper will explore in greater detail. Moving Malcode The mechanism a worm uses to mobilize itself often has great implications for the code: from how successful it is to how it is cataloged by antivirus researchers (not the specific name given to a virus/worm, but the generic class is it dropped into). Being an “IM worm” places malware into a large category, one that has exploded over the last 12 months. Inside this class of malicious software are many different means of jumping from client to client. IM worms transport themselves among clients in one of three main ways: via direct file transfer, sending a link to a third party server, or by sending a link to a web server created on the recently infected device. As is evident, in either of the last two cases, the URL sent out points to the malicious code for a target to download. Although it would seem that the more efficient transaction is to simply send a URL, worms have found success employing all of the methods. infectionvectors.com Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms 3 Method 1: Sending Copy of Worm to Contacts Infected with IM worm 2. Target opens Internet attached file and 1. Infected machine infects machine. sends message with copy of worm. Target IM-worm propagation by file attachment Much like mass mailers, IM worms often send the entire piece of malcode along with a message which hopes to entice the recipient into opening it. Method 2: Sending Link to Third Party Server Infected with IM worm Server hosting worm code 3. Server returns worm code. 1. Infected machine Internet sends message with link to server with worm copy . 2. Recipient clicks link in Target message. IM worm propagation via URL and manual download from 3rd party server infectionvectors.com Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms 4 Method 3: Sending Link to Infected Machine Infected with IM worm 2. Target clicks link, retrieving worm code from infected device. Internet 1. Infected machine sends message with link to new web server on local device . Target IM worm transmission via URL and manual download from infected machine Two of the most pervasive messaging worms (both released in 2005), Bropia and Kelvir, took different paths to meet the propagation requirement – Bropia sends a copy of itself with each message, Kelvir a link to a third party web site. In practice, it seems that a request to download a file from the Internet is not especially suspicious to many IM users, which is not surprising when one considers the success of email-based worms. The requirement, in most cases, for a user to execute a file once saved, is not much of hurdle either. Mass mailers for years have survived on the theory that sending a file to enough users will invariably lead to a healthy percentage of infections. The same principles that work for the email-borne malware work in favor of IM worms: they come from a recognized source in many cases, users are willing to take a chance with file extensions they assume to be “safe,” and simple message bodies can entice even generally skeptical readers. ahahhaa :p [URL] its you [URL] [URL] lol! see it! u’ll like it2 IM still enjoys a much greater sense of trust over email. Contact lists are thought to be fairly private, as are the communications channels. Given this, plus the length of mail worms’ life, it may be a great while before IM worms begin to slow down. Years of spam/phishing abuse and mail-based malware has hardened many users to distrust email, yet the spread of mass mailers like Mytob, Netsky, and Beagle continues at tremendous rates. infectionvectors.com Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms 5 Email became an easy target for worm coders because of its ubiquity and speed with which they could blanket targets with messages.3 The same can be said of IM, which targets the most popular of the protocols/clients. Recently, MSN was reported to have hit 155 million registered users.4 AOL’s AIM and Yahoo’s Messenger enjoy high user rates as well. Together these three clients make up the most targeted software (excluding IRC itself, which is still used by multiple worms to propagate and as a communications channel). Getting the Message The following review of IM worm highlights intends to give the reader a good perspective on how the family has developed over the last four years. It is not a complete record of every IM worm released; however, it does give a good overview of the code that has been distributed thus far. The first known worm to utilize the proprietary IM clients discovered in the wild is W32.Hello (also known as FunnyFiles).5 The April 25, 2001 release marked a new direction for malware, providing writers around the world with proof that the popular communications tool could effectively move a worm. The Hello worm did not carry any particularly destructive routines; it simply attempted to spread from client to client by sending a copy of itself to any new client or as a reply to any incoming message. The worm sent the following text with itself: i have a file for u. its real funny Hello garnered a good deal of media attention, as one would expect, although most was tempered with the appropriate level of reasoning6, explaining that it was not interested in destroying files and that the worm moved without the speed of applications like AnnaKournikova or LoveLetter.7 Even within the 3 major groupings for IM Worm propagation, there are interesting tactics to note. These range from the social engineering used to entice readers through the way the file transfer routines are coded. In the case of the second MSN Messenger worm released, Choke, this amounted to the seemingly “polite” request for the target to accept a file (disguised as a game).8 In reality, however, Choke will not stop asking until the contact allows the worm to spread. The worm will not, however, send a copy of itself twice to the same contact. Choke was discovered June 6, 2001. Aptly named, Annoying was released in August of 2001 for the MSN client.9 This worm took a different approach to propagating, actually respecting (if that is possible for self- propagating code) a user’s refusal. When the worm infected a machine, it sends the following as a reply to any incoming message: hey, want me to send my new pic? i took it yesterday infectionvectors.com Shoot the Messenger: IM Worms 6 Anyone responding to that with a “keyword” gets a copy of the worm. Keywords are: yes sure yea guess send there maybe ok cool So, if two boxes were infected, the first to manually send a message would get another copy (“send” is keyword), of course, the machines would already be infected. Annoying registers itself as a process named “MsgSprd.” On February 13, 2002 (4 days after proof of concept code was released for Microsoft security advisory MS02-00510), a JavaScript-coded worm named Menger appeared.11 It sends a link to the exploit/worm to all MSN contacts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statistical Structures: Fingerprinting Malware for Classification and Analysis
    Statistical Structures: Fingerprinting Malware for Classification and Analysis Daniel Bilar Wellesley College (Wellesley, MA) Colby College (Waterville, ME) bilar <at> alum dot dartmouth dot org Why Structural Fingerprinting? Goal: Identifying and classifying malware Problem: For any single fingerprint, balance between over-fitting (type II error) and under- fitting (type I error) hard to achieve Approach: View binaries simultaneously from different structural perspectives and perform statistical analysis on these ‘structural fingerprints’ Different Perspectives Idea: Multiple perspectives may increase likelihood of correct identification and classification Structural Description Statistical static / Perspective Fingerprint dynamic? Assembly Count different Opcode Primarily instruction instructions frequency static distribution Win 32 API Observe API calls API call vector Primarily call made dynamic System Explore graph- Graph structural Primarily Dependence modeled control and properties static Graph data dependencies Fingerprint: Opcode frequency distribution Synopsis: Statically disassemble the binary, tabulate the opcode frequencies and construct a statistical fingerprint with a subset of said opcodes. Goal: Compare opcode fingerprint across non- malicious software and malware classes for quick identification and classification purposes. Main result: ‘Rare’ opcodes explain more data variation then common ones Goodware: Opcode Distribution 1, 2 ---------.exe Procedure: -------.exe 1. Inventoried PEs (EXE, DLL, ---------.exe etc) on XP box with Advanced Disk Catalog 2. Chose random EXE samples size: 122880 with MS Excel and Index totalopcodes: 10680 3, 4 your Files compiler: MS Visual C++ 6.0 3. Ran IDA with modified class: utility (process) InstructionCounter plugin on sample PEs 0001. 002145 20.08% mov 4. Augmented IDA output files 0002. 001859 17.41% push with PEID results (compiler) 0003. 000760 7.12% call and general ‘functionality 0004.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Corporate Decision Makers' Attitudes Towards Active Cyber
    Protecting the Information Society: Exploring Corporate Decision Makers’ Attitudes towards Active Cyber Defence as an Online Deterrence Option by Patrick Neal A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Interdisciplinary Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Royal Roads University Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Supervisor: Dr. Bernard Schissel February, 2019 Patrick Neal, 2019 COMMITTEE APPROVAL The members of Patrick Neal’s Dissertation Committee certify that they have read the dissertation titled Protecting the Information Society: Exploring Corporate Decision Makers’ Attitudes towards Active Cyber Defence as an Online Deterrence Option and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Social Sciences: Dr. Bernard Schissel [signature on file] Dr. Joe Ilsever [signature on file] Ms. Bessie Pang [signature on file] Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copy of the dissertation to Royal Roads University. The dissertation supervisor confirms to have read this dissertation and recommends that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirements: Dr. Bernard Schissel[signature on file] Creative Commons Statement This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/ . Some material in this work is not being made available under the terms of this licence: • Third-Party material that is being used under fair dealing or with permission. • Any photographs where individuals are easily identifiable. Contents Creative Commons Statement............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GQ: Practical Containment for Measuring Modern Malware Systems
    GQ: Practical Containment for Measuring Modern Malware Systems Christian Kreibich Nicholas Weaver Chris Kanich ICSI & UC Berkeley ICSI & UC Berkeley UC San Diego [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Weidong Cui Vern Paxson Microsoft Research ICSI & UC Berkeley [email protected] [email protected] Abstract their behavior, sometimes only for seconds at a time (e.g., to un- Measurement and analysis of modern malware systems such as bot- derstand the bootstrapping behavior of a binary, perhaps in tandem nets relies crucially on execution of specimens in a setting that en- with static analysis), but potentially also for weeks on end (e.g., to ables them to communicate with other systems across the Internet. conduct long-term botnet measurement via “infiltration” [13]). Ethical, legal, and technical constraints however demand contain- This need to execute malware samples in a laboratory setting ex- ment of resulting network activity in order to prevent the malware poses a dilemma. On the one hand, unconstrained execution of the from harming others while still ensuring that it exhibits its inher- malware under study will likely enable it to operate fully as in- ent behavior. Current best practices in this space are sorely lack- tended, including embarking on a large array of possible malicious ing: measurement researchers often treat containment superficially, activities, such as pumping out spam, contributing to denial-of- sometimes ignoring it altogether. In this paper we present GQ, service floods, conducting click fraud, or obscuring other attacks a malware execution “farm” that uses explicit containment prim- by proxying malicious traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Workaround for Welchia and Sasser Internet Worms in Kumamoto University
    Workaround for Welchia and Sasser Internet Worms in Kumamoto University Yasuo Musashi, Kenichi Sugitani,y and Ryuichi Matsuba,y Center for Multimedia and Information Technologies, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555 Japan, E-mail: [email protected], yE-mail: [email protected], yE-mail: [email protected] Toshiyuki Moriyamaz Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sojo University, Ikeda, Kumamoto 860-0081 Japan, zE-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The syslog messages of the iplog-2.2.3 packet capture in the DNS servers in Ku- mamoto University were statistically investigated when receiving abnormal TCP packets from PC terminals infected with internet worms like W32/Welchia and/or W32/Sasser.D worms. The inter- esting results are obtained: (1) Initially, the W32/Welchia worm-infected PC terminals for learners (920 PCs) considerably accelerates the total W32/Welchia infection. (2) We can suppress quickly the W32/Sasser.D infection in our university when filtering the access between total and the PC terminal’s LAN segments. Therefore, infection of internet worm in the PC terminals for learners should be taken into consideration to suppress quickly the infection. Keywords: Welchia, Sasser, internet worm, system vulnerability, TCP port 135, TCP port 445, worm detection 1. Introduction defragmentation, TCP stream reassembling (state- less/stateful), and content matcher (detection engine). Recent internet worms (IW) are mainly categorized The other is iplog[11], a packet logger that is not so into two types, as follows: one is a mass-mailing-worm powerful as Snort but it is slim and light-weighted so (MMW) which transfers itself by attachment files of that it is useful to get an IP address of the client PC the E-mail and the other is a system-vulnerability- terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blaster Worm: Then and Now
    Worms The Blaster Worm: Then and Now The Blaster worm of 2003 infected at least 100,000 Microsoft Windows systems and cost millions in damage. In spite of cleanup efforts, an antiworm, and a removal tool from Microsoft, the worm persists. Observing the worm’s activity can provide insight into the evolution of Internet worms. MICHAEL n Wednesday, 16 July 2003, Microsoft and continued to BAILEY, EVAN Security Bulletin MS03-026 (www. infect new hosts COOKE, microsoft.com/security/incident/blast.mspx) more than a year later. By using a wide area network- FARNAM O announced a buffer overrun in the Windows monitoring technique that observes worm infection at- JAHANIAN, AND Remote Procedure Call (RPC) interface that could let tempts, we collected observations of the Blaster worm DAVID WATSON attackers execute arbitrary code. The flaw, which the during its onset in August 2003 and again in August 2004. University of Last Stage of Delirium (LSD) security group initially This let us study worm evolution and provides an excel- Michigan uncovered (http://lsd-pl.net/special.html), affected lent illustration of a worm’s four-phase life cycle, lending many Windows operating system versions, including insight into its latency, growth, decay, and persistence. JOSE NAZARIO NT 4.0, 2000, and XP. Arbor When the vulnerability was disclosed, no known How the Blaster worm attacks Networks public exploit existed, and Microsoft made a patch avail- The initial Blaster variant’s decompiled source code re- able through their Web site. The CERT Coordination veals its unique behavior (http://robertgraham.com/ Center and other security organizations issued advisories journal/030815-blaster.c).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Malware
    The Ecology of Malware Jedidiah R. Crandall Roya Ensafi Stephanie Forrest University of New Mexico University of New Mexico University of New Mexico Dept. of Computer Science Dept. of Computer Science Dept. of Computer Science Mail stop: MSC01 1130 Mail stop: MSC01 1130 Mail stop: MSC01 1130 1 University of New Mexico 1 University of New Mexico 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Joshua Ladau Bilal Shebaro Santa Fe Institute University of New Mexico 1399 Hyde Park Road Dept. of Computer Science Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Mail stop: MSC01 1130 [email protected] 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 [email protected] ABSTRACT General Terms The fight against malicious software (or malware, which includes Security everything from worms to viruses to botnets) is often viewed as an “arms race.” Conventional wisdom is that we must continu- Keywords ally “raise the bar” for the malware creators. However, the mul- titude of malware has itself evolved into a complex environment, malware ecology, malware analysis, worms, viruses, botnets and properties not unlike those of ecological systems have begun to emerge. This may include competition between malware, fa- 1. INTRODUCTION cilitation, parasitism, predation, and density-dependent population regulation. Ecological principles will likely be useful for under- Modern malware defense involves a variety of activities and is standing the effects of these ecological interactions, for example, quickly becoming unsustainable. So many malware samples are carrying capacity, species-time and species-area relationships, the collected from the wild each day that triaging is necessary to deter- unified neutral theory of biodiversity, and the theory of island bio- mine which samples warrant further analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging ICT Threats
    SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Information & Communication Technologies Secure, dependable and trusted Infrastructures COORDINATION ACTION Grant Agreement no. 216331 Deliverable D3.1: White book: Emerging ICT threats Contractual Date of Delivery 31/12/2009 Actual Date of Delivery 17/01/2010 Deliverable Security Class Public Editor FORWARD Consortium Contributors FORWARD Consortium Quality Control FORWARD Consortium The FORWARD Consortium consists of: Technical University of Vienna Coordinator Austria Institut Eurecom´ Principal Contractor France Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Principal Contractor The Netherlands ICS/FORTH Principal Contractor Greece IPP/BAS Principal Contractor Bulgaria Chalmers University Principal Contractor Sweden Keyword cloud image on cover created by Wordle.net. D3.1: White book: Emerging ICT threats 2 Contents 1 Executive Summary and Main Recommendations 7 2 Introduction: Threat List 11 3 Threat Category: Networking 15 3.1 Overview . 15 3.2 Routing infrastructure . 17 3.3 IPv6 and direct reachability of hosts . 18 3.4 Naming (DNS) and registrars . 20 3.5 Wireless communication . 22 3.6 Denial of service . 24 4 Threat Category: Hardware and Virtualization 27 4.1 Overview . 27 4.2 Malicious hardware . 27 4.3 Virtualization and cloud computing . 29 5 Threat Category: Weak Devices 31 5.1 Overview . 31 5.2 Sensors and RFID . 32 5.3 Mobile device malware . 34 6 Threat Category: Complexity 39 6.1 Overview . 39 6.2 Unforeseen cascading effects . 39 6.3 Threats due to scale . 41 6.4 System maintainability and verifiability . 43 6.5 Hidden functionality . 44 6.6 Threats due to parallelism . 45 7 Threat Category: Data Manipulation 47 7.1 Overview . 47 7.2 Privacy and ubiquitous sensors .
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Hacking
    Ethical Hacking Alana Maurushat University of Ottawa Press ETHICAL HACKING ETHICAL HACKING Alana Maurushat University of Ottawa Press 2019 The University of Ottawa Press (UOP) is proud to be the oldest of the francophone university presses in Canada and the only bilingual university publisher in North America. Since 1936, UOP has been “enriching intellectual and cultural discourse” by producing peer-reviewed and award-winning books in the humanities and social sciences, in French or in English. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Title: Ethical hacking / Alana Maurushat. Names: Maurushat, Alana, author. Description: Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: Canadiana (print) 20190087447 | Canadiana (ebook) 2019008748X | ISBN 9780776627915 (softcover) | ISBN 9780776627922 (PDF) | ISBN 9780776627939 (EPUB) | ISBN 9780776627946 (Kindle) Subjects: LCSH: Hacking—Moral and ethical aspects—Case studies. | LCGFT: Case studies. Classification: LCC HV6773 .M38 2019 | DDC 364.16/8—dc23 Legal Deposit: First Quarter 2019 Library and Archives Canada © Alana Maurushat, 2019, under Creative Commons License Attribution— NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Printed and bound in Canada by Gauvin Press Copy editing Robbie McCaw Proofreading Robert Ferguson Typesetting CS Cover design Édiscript enr. and Elizabeth Schwaiger Cover image Fragmented Memory by Phillip David Stearns, n.d., Personal Data, Software, Jacquard Woven Cotton. Image © Phillip David Stearns, reproduced with kind permission from the artist. The University of Ottawa Press gratefully acknowledges the support extended to its publishing list by Canadian Heritage through the Canada Book Fund, by the Canada Council for the Arts, by the Ontario Arts Council, by the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, and by the University of Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abbreviated History of Automation & Industrial Controls Systems And
    An Abbreviated History of Automation & Industrial Controls Systems and Cybersecurity A SANS Analyst Whitepaper Written by: Ernie Hayden GICSP, CISSP, CEH | Michael Assante | Tim Conway August 2014 ©2014 SANS™ Institute About this Paper Automation and Industrial Control Systems – often referred to as ICS – have an interesting and fairly long history. Today it’s quite common to see discussions of industrial controls paired cyber/physical security; however, that’s a relatively recent phenomenon. This paper will cover some of the history and evolution of today’s control systems and provide an accounting of how cybersecurity emerged as a significant concern to their reliability and predictability. For the purposes of this paper we will be using “ICS” to refer to the many types of auto- mation and control system applications. This definition will get us off to a good start: Industrial Control Systems (ICS): A term used to encompass the many applications and uses of industrial and facility control and automation systems. ISA-99/IEC 62443 is using Industrial Automation and Control Systems (ISA- 62443.01.01) with one proposed definition being “a collection of personnel, hardware, and software that can affect or influence the safe, secure, and reliable operation of an industrial process.” The following table includes just a few of Some refer to the collection the ICS-related applications and labels we use. of technologies that supports operations as “Operational Types of Industrial/Facility Technology (OT)” to distinguish Automation & Control Uses
    [Show full text]
  • A Behavior Based Approach to Virus Detection Jose Andre Morales Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2008 A Behavior Based Approach to Virus Detection Jose Andre Morales Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI08081536 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Morales, Jose Andre, "A Behavior Based Approach to Virus Detection" (2008). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 41. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/41 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida A BEHAVIOR BASED APPROACH TO VIRUS DETECTION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in COMPUTER SCIENCE by Jose Andre Morales 2008 To: Interim Dean Amir Mirmiran College of Engineering and Computing This dissertation, written by Jose Andre Morales, and entitled A Behavior Based Approach to Virus Detection, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. Xudong He Geoffrey Smith B.M. Golam Kibria Peter J. Clarke, Co-Major Professor Yi Deng, Co-Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2008 The dissertation of Jose Andre Morales is approved. Interim Dean Amir Mirmiran College of Engineering and Computing Dean George Walker University Graduate School Florida International University, 2008 ii c Copyright 2008 by Jose Andre Morales All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013  2013 5Th International Conference on Cyber Conflict
    2013 2013 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict PROCEEDINGS K. Podins, J. Stinissen, M. Maybaum (Eds.) 4-7 JUNE 2013, TALLINN, ESTONIA 2013 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER CONFLICT (CYCON 2013) Copyright © 2013 by NATO CCD COE Publications. All rights reserved. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP1326N-PRT ISBN 13 (print): 978-9949-9211-4-0 ISBN 13 (pdf): 978-9949-9211-5-7 ISBN 13 (epub): 978-9949-9211-6-4 Copyright and Reprint Permissions No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence ([email protected]). This restriction does not apply to making digital or hard copies of this publication for internal use within NATO, and for personal or educational use when for non-profit or non- commercial purposes, providing that copies bear this notice and a full citation on the first page as follows: [Article author(s)], [full article title] 2013 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict K. Podins, J. Stinissen, M. Maybaum (Eds.) 2013 © NATO CCD COE Publications Printed copies of this publication are available from: NATO CCD COE Publications Filtri tee 12, 10132 Tallinn, Estonia Phone: +372 717 6800 Fax: +372 717 6308 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ccdcoe.org Layout: Marko Söönurm Legal Notice: This publication contains opinions of the respective authors only. They do not necessarily reflect the policy or the opinion of NATO CCD COE, NATO, or any agency or any government.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Diffusion of Computer Security Threats
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2006 It came from the Internet : media diffusion of computer security threats Adam Paul Patridge Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Patridge, Adam Paul, "It came from the Internet : media diffusion of computer security threats" (2006). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 19035. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/19035 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. It came from the Internet: Media diffusion of computer security threats by Adam Paul Patridge A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Human Computer Interaction Program of Study Committee: Chad Harms, Major Professor Kim Smith Anthony Townsend Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2006 Copyright ©Adam Paul Patridge, 2006. All rights reserved. 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the master's thesis of Adam Paul Patridge has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 4 COMPUTER SECURITY 4 Computer Security Threats 4 Lifespan of a Threat 6 DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION 7 History of Diffusion Research 8 Innovation Adoption Process 10 Diffusion of Innovation Components 12 Diffusion Criticisms 18 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 19 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]