2. Project Description

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2. Project Description Consultancy Agreement No. CE 63/2008 Providing Sufficient Water Depth for Kwai Tsing Container Basin and its Approach Channel Environmental Impact Assessment Report 2. Project Description 2.1 The Project Requirements and Programme The southern portion of the Rambler Channel between Tsing Yi and Kwai Chung has been developed into Hong Kong’s primary container shipment port. Nine container terminals, comprising a total of 24 berths which line the east and west sides of the channel, are collectively referred to as the Kwai Tsing Container Port (KTCP), and the waterway within the KTCP is referred to as the Kwai Tsing Container Basin (KTCB). Access for ocean-going container vessels between the KTCB and the main shipping lanes is along the section of the Northern Fairway to the south of Tsing Yi, the Western Fairway and the East Lamma Traffic Separation Scheme (ELTSS). Developments within the container shipping industry have seen the introduction of ultra-large container ships (ULCS) to the main intercontinental shipping routes. These vessels have a maximum draft of 15.5m. The current average seabed level within the KTCB is approximately -15.6mCD, while depths in parts of the approaches to the KTCB are shallower. Therefore, it is proposed under this Project to deepen the seabed level of the KTCB and its marine access route to provide adequate depth of water to enable the new generation of ULCS to call at the KTCP. The Project layout is shown in Figure 2.1 . The Project’s objective is to lower the seabed in the KTCB and its access fairways and channels so as to maintain an adequate clearance for ULCS at all times. For the purpose of determining the functional least depth of dredging, the maximum draft of an ULCS is taken to be 15.5m. It is recommended in Marine Department’s “The Complete Berthing Guidelines for Port of Hong Kong” that an under-keel clearance of 10% of the maximum draft is provided within manoeuvring basins, sheltered fairways and approaches to berths. Marine Department has confirmed the applicability of this criterion to the Kwai Tsing Container Basin and its approaches in the Northern and Western Fairways as well as the East Lamma Traffic Separation Scheme, and has advised that the minimum depth to be provided is 17.0m below lowest astronomical tide, corresponding to a sea bed level of -17.0mCD. In order to determine the appropriate maintained seabed level, an assessment of the sedimentation rates within the Project area since 1990 has been carried out. The assessment concludes that the potential for sedimentation within the Project area is low. However, it is not known with certainty that the conditions which existed in the period covered by the assessment will prevail for the service life of the KTCP. In order to account for possible increases in the sediment load in the Pearl River Estuary, yet still achieving a sensible balance between capital and maintenance dredging works, a target seabed level of -17.5mCD has been adopted. In Section 2.2.1 of Port Works Design Manual Part 1, the Chart Datum (CD) is 0.146m below the Principal Datum (PD). Therefore, the target seabed level is -17.646mPD. For construction tolerance, the final seabed level should not be shallower than the targeted level, nor should it be 0.3m deeper than the targeted level. In addition to the foregoing, modification of the Tsing Yi Submarine Sewage Outfall and demolition of the Kwai Chung Submarine Sewage Outfall are included as part of the scope of works for this Project. For the Tsing Yi Submarine Sewage Outfall modification works, this will involve removal of the rock armour, replacement of the existing riser pipes and non-return valves, and followed by the re-application of rock armour. Demolition of the Kwai Chung Submarine Sewage Outfall will only involve the dismantling of the pipe section that is above the dredge level. The dredged volume quoted in the Study Brief was 5.5Mm 3; 259053/TNI/ENL/23/E July 2010 P:\Hong Kong\MRT\259053 KTCB\01 Project Management\71 Deliverables\07 Environmental Impact Assessment Report\FINAL_PE\EIA_Rpt_Jul 10_Ch 2.doc 2-1 Consultancy Agreement No. CE 63/2008 Providing Sufficient Water Depth for Kwai Tsing Container Basin and its Approach Channel Environmental Impact Assessment Report however, as the engineering design has progressed in parallel with this EIA, the dredged volume has been refined to be at 4.4Mm 3. This provides environmental benefit through the reduction in the volume of material to be dredged and disposed of as well as reducing the extent of potential impacts on the receiving water column. According to the latest estimate, the Project is tentatively scheduled to commence works in the second half of 2011, to be substantially completed within 2 years except for a small area near Container Terminal no. 1 and 5. 2.2 The Study Area and Surrounding Environment The Kwai Tsing Container Port (KTCP), located in the north-western part of the harbour in the reclamation along Rambler Channel between Kwai Chung and Tsing Yi Island, comprises nine container terminals with 24 berths of 7,804 m of deep sea frontage and is operated by five companies, each responsible for maintaining a strip of seabed of approximately 50 m wide along the terminals. In addition to KTCP, the study area also includes a portion of Northern Fairway south of Tsing Yi Island and a section of Western Fairway west of Hong Kong Island. Additionally, to the northwest side of the container basin, there are also two submarine outfalls namely Tsing Yi Submarine Sewage Outfall and Kwai Chung Submarine Sewage Outfall which are part of the project. Collectively, the study area occupies an area of approximately 446 ha in size. 2.3 Need for the Project and Consequences of not Proceeding with the Project Hong Kong’s container port is the third busiest in the world after Singapore and Shanghai, followed by Shenzhen. It is renowned for its efficient cargo-handling operations making it a preferred shipping hub in the region. With the global trend of increasing size of container ships, the ULCS to be generated in the near future will have a maximum draft of 15.5m. However the KTCB and its approach channel are being maintained at the depth of about -15.5 mCD with some parts being only at -15.2 mCD, while the water depth for the Yantian Container Port in Shenzhen is at -16.0m. In the short term, with the trend of the increasing size of container vessels, current container ships occasionally have to wait for high tide to depart from Kwai Tsing Container Port due to insufficient depth of the KTCB. Such limitations reduce the efficiency in cargo-handling operations, potentially harm the reputation of Kwai Tsing Container Port and conceivably could encourage vessels to make alternative arrangements including the diversion of traffic to Shenzhen and other regional ports. The execution of this Project is therefore necessary to keep the container basin deep enough to maintain current efficiencies and to facilitate the growing size of container ships in the short term. In addition, it is also needed to meet the draft requirement of ULCS and to maintain the competitiveness of the Kwai Tsing Container Port and Hong Kong as a regional hub port in the long term. Benefits from this Project are the considerable increase in import and export capacity and the associated economic and social gains for Hong Kong as a whole. In the absence of this Project, the insufficient depth of KTCB and its approach channel will cause Kwai Tsing Container Port to become less efficient given the increased vessel sizes, including the inability to physically berth and accommodate the ULCS. The long-term development potential of the Kwai Tsing Container Port will inevitably be constrained by the depth of KTCB and its approach channel. International shipping lines will no longer continue to call into the Hong Kong port but turn to Yantian Port or other ports, 259053/TNI/ENL/23/E July 2010 P:\Hong Kong\MRT\259053 KTCB\01 Project Management\71 Deliverables\07 Environmental Impact Assessment Report\FINAL_PE\EIA_Rpt_Jul 10_Ch 2.doc 2-2 Consultancy Agreement No. CE 63/2008 Providing Sufficient Water Depth for Kwai Tsing Container Basin and its Approach Channel Environmental Impact Assessment Report resulting in the long term, in a critical loss of shipping trade and declining competitiveness of Hong Kong in the world port economy. 2.4 Consideration of Alternative Construction Methods and Sequence of Work 2.4.1 “Do Nothing” Scenario The “do nothing” scenario is described in the preceding section 2.3. The current depth of the KTCB limits the efficiency of KTCP and threatens the long term position of Hong Kong as a regional hub and world class port. The new generation of ULCS is expected to have a draft of 15.5m. This means that in order for these ULCS to access the container terminals at KTCP, a minimum water depth of about 17m would be required. Current seabed levels thus constrain access by ULCS to tides higher than +1.5mCD. Such restrictions on the permissible access time for ULCS would severely hinder the operational flexibility and efficiency of these container ships, and would be an impractical option for both shipping lines and terminal operators. Consequently, a “do nothing” option is not considered viable for the long term economy of Hong Kong. 2.4.2 Alternative Locations KTCP is currently the only port in Hong Kong that contains the facilities which can handle the volumes of cargo associated with the ULCS.
Recommended publications
  • Hongkong a Study in Economic Freedom
    HongKOng A Study In Economic Freedom Alvin Rabushka Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace Stanford University The 1976-77 William H. Abbott Lectures in International Business and Economics The University of Chicago • Graduate School of Business © 1979 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. ISBN 0-918584-02-7 Contents Preface and Acknowledgements vn I. The Evolution of a Free Society 1 The Market Economy 2 The Colony and Its People 10 Resources 12 An Economic History: 1841-Present 16 The Political Geography of Hong Kong 20 The Mother Country 21 The Chinese Connection 24 The Local People 26 The Open Economy 28 Summary 29 II. Politics and Economic Freedom 31 The Beginnings of Economic Freedom 32 Colonial Regulation 34 Constitutional and Administrative Framework 36 Bureaucratic Administration 39 The Secretariat 39 The Finance Branch 40 The Financial Secretary 42 Economic and Budgetary Policy 43 v Economic Policy 44 Capital Movements 44 Subsidies 45 Government Economic Services 46 Budgetary Policy 51 Government Reserves 54 Taxation 55 Monetary System 5 6 Role of Public Policy 61 Summary 64 III. Doing Business in Hong Kong 67 Location 68 General Business Requirements 68 Taxation 70 Employment and Labor Unions 74 Manufacturing 77 Banking and Finance 80 Some Personal Observations 82 IV. Is Hong Kong Unique? Its Future and Some General Observations about Economic Freedom 87 The Future of Hong Kong 88 Some Preliminary Observations on Free-Trade Economies 101 Historical Instances of Economic Freedom 102 Delos 103 Fairs and Fair Towns: Antwerp 108 Livorno 114 The Early British Mediterranean Empire: Gibraltar, Malta, and the Ionian Islands 116 A Preliminary Thesis of Economic Freedom 121 Notes 123 Vt Preface and Acknowledgments Shortly after the August 1976 meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society, held in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Building on Solid Foundations
    Building on Solid Foundations World-class Design, Planning and Management Executive Management’s Report All units at The Capitol at LOHAS Park were pre-sold. Property and Other Businesses The Hong Kong property market performed strongly in the first half of 2008. Both office and retail markets enjoyed steady growth. However, with global credit market uncertainties developing into a global economic downturn, market activities slowed noticeably in the second half. Sale prices for residential units declined, and commercial rents started to consolidate. 48 MTR Corporation Annual Report 2008 Profit from property development was HK$4,670 million in 2008, Property Development while revenue from property rental, management and other businesses grew by 47.9% to HK$2,712 million. HK$4.67 Billion Property Development Profit Property Development Profit on property development for 2008 was HK$4,670 million, 2 Property Tenders a decrease from the HK$8,304 million recognised in 2007. This Awarded decrease was mainly due to very significant development profits with a Total GFA of 203,719 sq.m. booking in 2007, particularly for Le Point in Tseung Kwan O. The major contributors to property development profits were from profit recognition relating to The Capitol at LOHAS Park and The Palazzo in Shatin, as well as the sale of units from inventory at Property Rental Harbour Green and The Arch. In addition, there was deferred income recognition, mainly from properties along the Airport 48.4% Increase Railway, such as Coastal Skyline and Caribbean Coast in Tung in Rental Income Chung Station, and Elements in Kowloon Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 931/01-02(01) Route 3 Country Park Section Invitation For
    CB(1)931/01-02(01) COPY ROUTE 3 COUNTRY PARK SECTION INVITATION FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST PROJECT OUTLINE TRANSPORT BRANCH HONG KONG GOVERNMENT MARCH 1993 INVITATION FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST IN DEVELOPING THE COUNTRY PARK SECTION OF ROUTE 3 ("THE PROJECT") Project Outline N.B. This Outline is issued for information purposes only, with a view to inviting expressions of interest for the finance. design, construction and operation of the Project. 1 Introduction 1.1 Route 3, to be constructed to expressway standard between Au Tau in Yuen Long and Sai Ying Pun on Hong Kong Island, is a key element in the future road infrastructure in the Territory. 1.2 The primary function of Route 3 is to serve the growing traffic demand in the North West New Territories. the Kwai Chung Container Port and western Kowloon. The southern portion of Route 3 forms part of the principal access to the Chek Lap Kok Airport. This comprises the Tsing Yi and Kwai Chung Sections from northwest Tsing Yi to Mei Foo, the West Kowloon Expressway and the Western Harbour Crossing to Hong Kong Island, all of which are included in the Airport Core Programme. 1.3 The northern portion of Route 3, namely the Country Park Section. consists of the following principal elements:- (a) The Ting Kau Bridge and the North West Tsing Yi Interchange; (b) The Tai Lam Tunnel including the Ting Kau interchange; and (c) The Yuen Long Approach from Au Tau to Tai Lam Tunnel including the connections to the roads in the area including the Yuen Long Southern By-pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Evolution of the Chinese Port System (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet
    Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet To cite this version: Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD). Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Wiley, 2013, 104 (5), pp.521-538. 10.1111/tesg.12033. halshs-00831906 HAL Id: halshs-00831906 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00831906 Submitted on 28 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221 BC - 2010 AD) Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET1 French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Pre-final version of the paper published in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 521-538. Abstract Spatial models of port system evolution often depict linearly the emergence of hierarchy through successive concentration phases of originally scattered ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Shipping Register and Shipping Tax Regime in Hong Kong Contents
    Guide to Shipping Register and Shipping Tax Regime in Hong Kong Contents The Hong Kong Shipping Register 1 Taxation of Shipping Profits in Hong Kong 8 Schedule 12 The Hong Kong Shipping Register Until 3 December 1990, the United Kingdom Merchant Shipping Acts (the “Acts”) (except for the Merchant Shipping Act 1988) applied to registration of ships and to mortgages of ships in Hong Kong. A ship registered at the Port of Hong Kong was, therefore, a British ship. Hong Kong reverted to Chinese sovereignty on 1 July 1997 and became a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Section VIII of Annex I to the Sino- British Joint Declaration which relates to the transfer of sovereignty states that: “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall maintain Hong Kong’s previous systems of shipping management and shipping regulation, including the system for regulating conditions of seamen. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government in the field of shipping shall be defined by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government on its own. Private shipping businesses and shipping-related businesses and private container terminals in Hong Kong may continue to operate freely. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be authorised by the Central People’s Government to continue to maintain a shipping register and issue related certificates under its own legislation in the name of ‘Hong Kong, China’.” The Hong Kong Government appointed a Steering Committee in 1987 to advise the Government on the establishment of an independent shipping registry. The result was enacted as the Merchant Shipping (Registration) Ordinance (Cap 415) (the “Ordinance”), which came into effect on 3 December 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Benefits of Shore Power at the Port of Shenzhen
    WHITE PAPER DECEMBER 2015 COSTS AND BENEFITS OF SHORE POWER AT THE PORT OF SHENZHEN Haifeng Wang, Ph.D., Xiaoli Mao, and Dan Rutherford, Ph.D. www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was commissioned by the China Environment Forum (CEF) at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars as part of its Choke Point: Port Cities initiative, funded by the Henry Luce Foundation. The authors thank Irene Kwan and Simon Ng for their technical support and Tim Leong for his critical review of the work. The authors also especially thank Shenzhen Human Settlements and Environmental Committee and the Port of Oakland for their review and recommendations for the report. ABOUT THE CHINA ENVIRONMENT FORUM (CEF) Since 1997, the China Environment Forum (CEF) has been the “go-to” resource for convening policy, business, research, and NGO practitioners on the most pressing energy, water, and pollution problems facing China. Through meetings, publications, and exchanges, they play a unique nonpartisan role in creating multistakeholder dialogues around China’s energy and environmental challenges, identifying new areas of collaboration. CEF’s work is frequently featured in mainstream media, including: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, BBC News, The Guardian, Bloomberg Businessweek, and Foreign Policy. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • A Competitive Analysis of Port of Hong Kong: from External to Internal Zihua Liu1, Dong Yang2* and Y
    Liu et al. Journal of Shipping and Trade (2020) 5:7 Journal of Shipping https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-020-00062-2 and Trade ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access A competitive analysis of port of Hong Kong: from external to internal Zihua Liu1, Dong Yang2* and Y. N. Eppie Ng2 * Correspondence: dong.yang@ polyu.edu.hk Abstract 2Shipping Research Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, This paper aims to analyse the competitive equilibrium of Hong Kong international Hong Kong SAR, China port after the cooperation among terminal operators. To achieve our research Full list of author information is objective, a comprehensive analysis framework is proposed. We assume that the port available at the end of the article services provided by Shenzhen and Hong Kong have heterogeneity, thus apply Cournot price competition model to understand the external competition. We find that the heterogeneity level can affect the demand of Hong Kong international port. For different heterogeneity levels, different competitive equilibriums among terminal operators of Hong Kong are discussed. We further apply Edgeworth model and Stackelberg Leadership Model to describe the internal competition of Hong Kong international port. Based on analysis, some recommendations are provided to the terminal operators of Hong Kong. Keywords: Terminal/port competition, Service heterogeneity, Cournot price competition, Edgeworth model, Stackelberg leadership model Introduction With the current dynamic business environment, port and container terminal opera- tors in the same region are facing keen competition from each other (Kaselimi et al. 2011). In recent years, liner shipping companies restructure and reform their shipping alliances, which significantly improves their bargaining power towards port and con- tainer terminal operators and port competition arises.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Shipping and Port Development Strategies
    CONTENTS Page SUMMARY .................................................................................................................V KEY FINDINGS ......................................................................................................VII 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 1.1 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE ......................................................................................1 1.2 STUDY APPROACH.............................................................................................1 1.3 MODELLING APPROACH ....................................................................................2 1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE AND CONTENTS ................................................................3 2. CHANGES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND SHIPPING .......................4 2.1 CHANGES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE ................................................................4 2.2 COMPETITION AND REGULATION OF LINER SHIPPING........................................5 2.3 SHIPPING LINE RESPONSE..................................................................................9 2.4 IMPLICATIONS FOR PORTS ...............................................................................11 3. CONTAINER TRADE GROWTH....................................................................13 3.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................13 3.2 LOOKING FORWARD ........................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Seaports and Airports with Reported Threats
    Largest Seaports and Airports with Reported Threats Sources: riskmethods (reported threats based on multi-year trends) and Wikipedia (cargo and container traffic, 2017) Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl. Airport Port of Hamburg Port of Rotterdam Port of Antwerp Frankfurt am Main Intl. Airport Port of Tianjin Port of Los Angeles Port of New York Port of Port of Busan Shanghai Pudong Intl. Airport Qingdao Louisville Port of Intl. Airport Port of Shanghai Port of Ningbo-Zhousan Long Beach Memphis Port Guangzhou Intl. Airport Port of Kaohsiung Dubai Intl. Hong Kong Intl. Airport Taiwan Taoyuan Intl. Airport Airport Port of Hong Kong Europe Civil Unrest Disaster at Location Extratropical Storm Industrial Dispute Asia Disaster Earthquake Extratropical Flash Flood Industrial Power Tropical Terrorist at Location Storm Dispute Outage Cyclone Attack Cargo Airports Cargo (in tons) Cargo Airports Cargo (in tons) Frankfurt am Main Intl. Airport, Germany 2.110.670 Hong Kong Intl. Airport, China 4.881.075 Cargo Seaports Container Traffic (in thous. TEUs) Shanghai Pudong Intl. Airport, China 3.703.431 Port of Hamburg, Germany 9.000 Dubai Intl. Airport, UAE 2.651.467 Port of Rotterdam, Netherlands 13.600 Taiwan Taoyuan Intl. Airport, Taiwan 2.233.493 Port of Antwerp, Belgium 10.450 Cargo Seaports Container Traffic (in thous. TEUs) Disaster Earthquake Extratropical Flash Flood Power Tropical Terrorist Tsunami Volcano Americas Industrial Port of Hong Kong, China 20.760 at Location Storm Dispute Outage Cyclone Attack Port of Tianjin, China 15.210 Cargo Airports Cargo (in tons) Port of Ningbo-Zhousan, China 24.610 Memphis Intl. Airport, USA 4.307.050 Port Guangzhou, China 20.370 Louisville Intl.
    [Show full text]
  • M / SP / 14 / 173 Ser Res
    ¬½á W¤á 300 200 Sheung Fa Shan LIN FA SHAN Catchwater flW˘§⁄ł§¤‚˛†p›ˇ M / SP / 14 / 173 Ser Res 200 w 200 SEE PLAN REF. No. M / SP / 14 / 173 NEEDLE HILL 532 FOR TSUEN WAN VILLAGE CLUSTER BOUNDARIES 500 è¦K 45 Catchwater fih 400 Catchwater 400 2 _ij 100 flW˘§⁄ł§¤‚˛†p›ˇ M / SP / 14 / 172 The Cliveden The Cairnhill JUBILEE (SHING MUN) ROUTE RESERVOIR ê¶È¥ Catchwater «ø 314 Yuen Yuen 9 SEE PLAN REF. No. M / SP / 14 / 172 Institute M' y TWISK Wo Yi Hop 46 23 22 10 FOR TSUEN WAN VILLAGE CLUSTER BOUNDARIES Ser Res 11 SHING MUN ROAD 200 Catchwater 300 Ser Res 3.2.1 Á³z² GD„‹ HILLTOP ROAD ãÅF r ú¥OªÐ e flA Toll Gate t 474 a Kwong Pan Tin 12 w h San Tsuen D c ù t «ø“G a C ¥s 25 SHEK LUNG KUNG ƒ Po Kwong Yuen –‰ ú¥Oª LO WAI ROAD ¶´ú 5 Tso Kung Tam Kwong Pan Tin «ø Tsuen “T Fu Yung Shan ƒ SAMT¤¯· TUNG UK ROAD 5 Lo Wai 14 20 Sam Tung Uk fl” 22 ø–⁄ U¤á 315 24 Resite Village 300 Ha Fa Shan ROAD ¥—¥ H¶»H¶s s· CHUN Pak Tin Pa 8 Cheung Shan 100 fl” 19 San Tsuen YI PEI 400 fl´« TSUEN KING CIRCUIT San Tsuen 13 Estate 100 5 ROAD Allway Gardens flW˘ 100 3.2.2 fl”· SHAN 3 ROAD fi Tsuen Wan Centre FU YUNG SHING 25 ˦Lª MUN Ser Res 28 Chuk Lam Hoi Pa Resite Village ST Tsuen King Sim Yuen 252 ¤{ ON YIN Garden G¤@ G¤@« Ma Sim Pei Tsuen Łƒ… “T» Yi Pei Chun Lei Muk Shue 2 SHING MUN TUNNEL »­» 26 Sai Lau Kok Ser Res Ser Res CHEUNG PEI SHAN ROAD Estate w ¥—¥ Tsuen Heung Fan Liu fl MEI WAN STREET 21 Pak Tin Pa M©y© ROAD «ø“ ·wƒ Tsuen 12 MA SIM PAI Lower Shing Mun Ser Res 18 Village «ø“ flw… 7 TSUEN KING CIRCUIT A ⁄· fi¯ł «ø“ƒ¤ Tsuen Tak ¤{ 200 ½ Shing Mun Valley W¤ª Garden
    [Show full text]
  • New Territories
    Branch ATM District Branch / ATM Address Voice Navigation ATM 1009 Kwai Chung Road, Kwai Chung, New Kwai Chung Road Branch P P Territories 7-11 Shek Yi Road, Sheung Kwai Chung, New Sheung Kwai Chung Branch P P P Territories 192-194 Hing Fong Road, Kwai Chung, New Ha Kwai Chung Branch P P P Territories Shop 102, G/F Commercial Centre No.1, Cheung Hong Estate Commercial Cheung Hong Estate, 12 Ching Hong Road, P P P P Centre Branch Tsing Yi, New Territories A18-20, G/F Kwai Chung Plaza, 7-11 Kwai Foo Kwai Chung Plaza Branch P P Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories Shop No. 114D, G/F, Cheung Fat Plaza, Cheung Fat Estate Branch P P P P Cheung Fat Estate, Tsing Yi, New Territories Shop 260-265, Metroplaza, 223 Hing Fong Metroplaza Branch P P Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories 40 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Kwai Cheong Road Branch P P P P Territories Shop 115, Maritime Square, Tsing Yi Island, Maritime Square Branch P P New Territories Maritime Square Wealth Management Shop 309A-B, Level 3, Maritime Square, Tsing P P P Centre Yi, New Territories ATM No.1 at Open Space Opposite to Shop No.114, LG1, Multi-storey Commercial /Car Shek Yam Shopping Centre Park Accommodation(also known as Shek Yam Shopping Centre), Shek Yam Estate, 120 Lei Muk Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories. Shop No.202, 2/F, Cheung Hong Shopping Cheung Hong Estate Centre No.2, Cheung Hong Estate, 12 Ching P Hong Road, Tsing Yi, New Territories Shop No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of China (Hong Kong)
    Bank of China (Hong Kong) Bank Branch Address 1. Central District Branch 2A Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong 2. Prince Edward Branch 774 Nathan Road, Kowloon 3. 194 Cheung Sha Wan Road 194-196 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Sham Shui Po, Branch Kowloon 4. Pak Tai Street Branch 4-6 Pak Tai Street, To Kwa Wan, Kowloon 5. Tsuen Wan Branch 297-299 Sha Tsui Road, Tsuen Wan, New Territories 6. Kwai Chung Road Branch 1009 Kwai Chung Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories 7. Sheung Kwai Chung 7-11 Shek Yi Road, Sheung Kwai Chung, New Branch Territories 8. Ha Kwai Chung Branch 192-194 Hing Fong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories 9. Fuk Tsun Street Branch 32-40 Fuk Tsun Street, Tai Kok Tsui, Kowloon 10. Kwong Fuk Road Branch 40-50 Kwong Fuk Road, Tai Po Market, New Territories 11. Texaco Road Branch Shop A112, East Asia Gardens, 36 Texaco Road, Tsuen Wan, New Territories 12. Cheung Hong Estate 2 G/F, Commercial Centre, Cheung Hong Estate, Commercial Centre Branch Tsing Yi Island, New Territories 13. Kin Wing Street Branch 24-30 Kin Wing Street, Tuen Mun, New Territories 14. Choi Wan Estate Branch Shop Nos. A317 and A318, 3/F, Choi Wan Shopping Centre Phase II, No. 45 Clear Water Bay Road, Ngau Chi Wan, Kowloon 15. Lung Hang Estate Branch 103 Lung Hang Commercial Centre, Sha Tin, New Territories 16. Lei Cheng Uk Estate Shop 108, Lei Cheng Uk Commercial Centre, Lei Branch Cheng Uk Estate, Kowloon 17. Heng Fa Chuen Branch Shop 205-208, East Wing Shopping Centre, Heng Fa Chuen, Chai Wan, Hong Kong 18.
    [Show full text]