Impact of Pesticides on Pollinators and Other Non-Target Organisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact of Pesticides on Pollinators and Other Non-Target Organisms Impact of Pesticides on Pollinators and other Non-target Organisms Keith Tignor Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services What is an Ideal Pollinator? • Mobile • Large number of individuals • Attracted to pollen source • Apparatus to carry pollen Presidential Memorandum June 20, 2014 • Created a Federal Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators • Establish Pollinator Health Task Force • Mission and Function of the Task Force: – Pollinator Research Action Plan – Public Education Plan – Public-Private Partnerships U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Status Review for the Monarch Butterfly • Migration more perilous for many monarchs because of threats along their migratory pathways and on their breeding and wintering grounds. • Habitat loss – Over wintering site – Migratory pathways • Mortality resulting from pesticide use – Adult mortality from insecticides – Loss of milkweed from herbicides What is a Pesticide • Agent used to kill or control undesired insects, weeds, rodents, fungi, bacteria, or other organisms • Pesticides are classified according to function: – Avicide – birds – Herbicides – weeds – Fungicides – fungi, mold and mildew – Insecticides – insects – Rodenticides – rodents • Herbicides are the most widely used type of pesticide in agriculture Pesticides Registered for Use in Virginia 18000 14,875 15,211 15000 14,214 14,500 14,570 11,861 12000 9000 6000 Registered Pesticides (no.) Pesticides Registered 3000 0 2003* . 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year Product count based on number registered on October 1 of each year. Categories of Pesticides ALGAECIDE HERBICIDE FERTILIZER WITH INSECTICIDE INSECTICIDE & NEMATICIDE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR FERTILIZER WITH INSECTICIDE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR ALGICIDE INSECTICIDE & REPELLENT & HERBICIDE WITH FERTILIZER FERTILIZER WITH INSECTICIDE PLANT-INCORPORATED ANTIFOULANT PAINT INSECTICIDE & TERMITICIDE AND FUNGICIDE PROTECTANT AVICIDE FUMIGANT INSECTICIDE ACARICIDE REPELLENT BIOCIDE (ALGAE, SLIME, INSECTICIDE, DISINFECTANT FUNGICIDE RODENTICIDE BACTERIA, FUNGI) & FUNGICIDE INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, BIONEMATICIDE FUNGICIDE & NEMATICIDE SANITIZER MITICIDE FUNGICIDE, HERBICIDE, DEFOLIANT LURE (PHEROMONES) SANITIZER & ALGICIDE INSECTICIDE & NEMATICIDE DISINFECTANT HERBICIDE MISCELLANEOUS SANITIZER & DISINFECTANT SANITIZER, DISINFECTANT, & DISINFECTANT, ALGAECIDE INSECT GROWTH REGULATOR MITICIDE (ACARICIDE) VIRUCIDE DISINFECTANT, FUNGICIDE, SANITIZER, DISINFECTANT, INSECTICIDE MOLLUSCICIDE VIRUCIDE FUNGICIDE, VIRUCIDE FERTILIZER WITH FUNGICIDE INSECTICIDE & FUNGICIDE NEMATICIDE TERMITICIDE TERMITICIDE, INSECTICIDE, FERTILIZER WITH HERBICIDE INSECTICIDE & MITICIDE OTHER FUNGICIDE Registered Pesticides in Virginia in 2014 REPELLENT ACARICIDE ALGAECIDE AVICIDE FUMIGANT MOLLUSCICIDE NEMATICIDE OTHER PRESERVATIVE INSECTICIDE FUNGICIDE RODENTICIDE HERBICIDE DISINFECTANT Total number of registered pesticides = 15,211 from Office of Pesticide Services, VDACS Active Ingredient of Conventional Pesticides Used in the U.S., 1980-2007 1200 16.7% decline 1000 800 600 400 200 Amount Applied (lb. x 1 million)x (lb.Applied Amount 0 Year from EPA website (http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/pestsales) Estimated Amount of Conventional Pesticides Used in the U.S. in 2007 600 Total Usage = 857 million lb. 500 400 300 200 Active Ingredient (million lb.) (million Ingredient Active 100 0 Herbicides/Plant Insecticides/Miticides Fungicides Nematicide/Fumigant Other Conventional Growth Regulators Type of Pesticide from A. Grube, Donaldson D., Kiely T., and Wu L. (2011) Estimated Amount of Conventional Pesticides Used in the U.S. in 2007 700 600 500 400 300 200 Active Ingredient (million lb.) (million Ingredient Active 100 0 Agriculture Ind/Comm/Gov Home & Garden Sector of Usage from A. Grube, Donaldson D., Kiely T., and Wu L. (2011) OneOne man’sman’s beneficial,trash, is another is another man’s man’s treasure Pest Politics Money Emotion Environmental Fate of Pesticides Ideal Pollinator – Honey Bee • Year round activity • Transportable population • Capable of Flight • 60,000 to 80,000 individuals in hive • Hairy – Nearly 100% of body covered with hair – Plumose hair – Pollen basket • Pollen and nectar are primary food source Detected Agrochemicals in North American Apiaries 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Pesticide contaminants (#) contaminants Pesticide 20 10 0 Bees Wax Pollen Sample Source from Mullin CA, Frazier M, Frazier JL, Ashcraft S, Simonds R, et al. (2010) Occurrence of Samples with Multiple Agrochemicals in North American Apiaries 10 8 6 4 2 Mean Multiple Pesticides (#) Pesticides MultipleMean 0 Bees Wax Pollen Total Sample Source from Mullin CA, Frazier M, Frazier JL, Ashcraft S, Simonds R, et al. (2010) Correlation of Fungicide Residues with Pesticide Contents of Pollen Samples from Mullin CA, Frazier M, Frazier JL, Ashcraft S, Simonds R, et al. (2010) Pesticide Impact on Honey Bee • R. Fell, Tignor K. (2001) – Reduced drone fecundity – Reduced queen cell production • J. Wu, Anelli C., Sheppard S. (2011) – Increased larval mortality – Delayed adult emergence – Reduced adult longevity • L. Dahlgren (2012) – Reduced queen survival • J. Berry, Hood W., Pietravalle S., Delaplane K. (2013) – Decreased brood survival – Increase queen supercedure Winter Hive Losses in Virginia 50 40 30 20 Colony Losses Colony Losses (%) 10 0 Year Overall colony losses of 32.9% during the period 2000-2014 Status of Bumble Bee Populations in Northern and Coastal Eastern States of the U.S. 0.8 1900-99 0.7 2007-09 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Relative Abundance Relative 0.1 0 Bombus spp. from S. Cameron, Lozier J., Strange J., Koch J., Cordes N., Solter L., Griswold T. (2011) Impact of Pesticides • Lethal • Sub-lethal – Broad spectrum – Weight loss – Toxicity to adult – Shorter life span – Toxicity to immature – Behavior changes – Lethal determination – Reduced fecundity • Dosage – Reduced immunity • Concentration – Deformity • Time – Mutation – Loss of habitat/food source Factors Affecting Pollinator Populations • Environment • Genetics –Temperature extremes – Diversity –Climate change – Isolation –Bloom dates – Integrity –Drought • Toxicants/pollutants • Nutrition – Point source – Habitat loss – Non-point source – Food resources .
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of 99 Pesticide Residues in Major Agricultural Products
    foods Article Evaluation of 99 Pesticide Residues in Major Agricultural Products from the Western Highlands Zone of Cameroon Using QuEChERS Method Extraction and LC-MS/MS and GC-ECD Analyses Joseph H. Y. Galani 1,2,* , Michael Houbraken 2, Abukari Wumbei 2 , Joseph F. Djeugap 3, Daniel Fotio 4 and Pieter Spanoghe 2 1 Department of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Université des Montagnes, P.O. Box 208, Bangangté, Cameroon 2 Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (A.W.); [email protected] (P.S.) 3 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon; [email protected] 4 Inter-States Pesticides Committee of Central Africa, P.O. Box 16344, Yaounde, Cameroon; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +237-674244181 Received: 17 October 2018; Accepted: 6 November 2018; Published: 7 November 2018 Abstract: There is no information available on pesticide residue levels in major food commodities harvested in Cameroon, especially from the western highlands region, the food basket of the country. Hence, this study evaluated the residues of 99 pesticides in 72 samples of 12 agricultural products collected in the region, using QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) method extraction, and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD). This method was suitable for detecting the targeted compounds: For 81 pesticides by LC-MS/MS, the limit of quantification (LOQ) was between 0.0004 and 0.0537 mg/kg; and for 18 halogenated pesticides by GC-ECD, it ranged from 0.0012 to 0.2180 mg/kg.
    [Show full text]
  • Nematicide/Insecticide
    PULL HERE TO OPEN RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE DUE TO TOXICITY FOR RETAIL SALE TO AND USE ONLY BY CERTIFIED APPLICATORS OR PERSONS UNDER THEIR DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND ONLY FOR THOSE USES COVERED BY THE CERTIFIED APPLICATOR’S CERTIFICATION. Nematicide/Insecticide A Seed Treatment Product to Protect Corn Seedlings from Early Season Nematode and Insect Damage For use only in Syngenta-certified corn seed treatment facilities and only in seed treatment equipment with closed transfer and application systems. Not for use in hopper box, planter box, slurry box, or other farmer-applied applications. Active Ingredients: Abamectin (CAS No. 65195-56-4 and No. 65195-55-3) 11.3% Thiamethoxam (CAS No. 153719-23-4) 14.2% Other Ingredients: 74.5% Total: 100.0% *1 fluid ounce of Avicta Duo 250 Corn contains 3.72 grams of abamectin and 4.65 grams of thiamethoxam. KEEP OUT OF REACH WARNING/AVISO OF CHILDREN. Si usted no entiende la etiqueta, busque a alguien para que se la explique a usted en detalle. (If you do not understand the label, find someone to explain it to you in detail.) See additional precautionary statements and directions for use in booklet. EPA Reg. No. 100-1353 EPA Est. 100-NE-001 15 gallons SCP 1353B-L1 1009 Net Contents FIRST AID If inhaled • Move person to fresh air. • If person is not breathing, call 911 or an ambulance, then give artificial respiration, preferably by mouth-to-mouth, if possible. • Call a poison control center or doctor for further treatment advice. If swallowed • Call poison control center or doctor immediately for treatment advice.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Best Management Practices for Brown Dog Ticks
    Best Management Practices For Brown Dog Ticks immediately seek shelter in cracks or crevices such as baseboards or furniture, but also commonly move en masse up walls and congregate in the corners of ceilings. These larvae eventually find the dog and receive their first blood meal. The larvae go largely unnoticed because they are about the size of a pencil tip. The larvae then drop off into the surrounding area, molt to the nymphal stage, and again seek the dog for a second blood meal. At this point owners occasionally notice the ticks, but they usually go unnoticed. After they molt to the adult stage, the ticks find the dog for a third and final blood meal. Ticks are noticed at this stage for two reasons: 1) Adult females engorge to the size of a raisin and are often located on or near the dog’s head, or 2) adults are seen Heavy infestation of BDT on the ear of a dog. crawling on floors actively looking for the dog. This “predatory” behavior is somewhat unique to ticks. The brown dog tick (BDT) can be a serious Typically, residents do not notice these ticks until they have pest in homes with pets. These Best Management completed a full generation. Often, overlapping generations of Practices are designed to support cooperation ticks occur in homes, so tick numbers can quickly multiply into the thousands. between homeowners and pest management A factor complicating BDT management is the ability of this professionals in order to prevent and control BDTs. tick to survive without a host for several months during each of At left: The black-legged its three life stages, thereby negating the “wait-it-out” strategy of tick (Ixodes scapularis).
    [Show full text]
  • MOCAP® 15% Granular Nematicide-Insecticide
    MOCAP® 15% Granular Nematicide-Insecticide EPA Reg. No. 264-457 Bayer CropScience LP P.O. Box 12014 2 T.W. Alexander Drive Use Directions for: Mints Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 1-866-99BAYER (1-866-992-2937) http://www.bayercropscienceus.com Supplemental Label RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE ACUTE DERMAL TOXICITY For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under the direct supervision of a Certified Applicator, and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator's certification. MOCAP® 15% Granular Nematicide-Insecticide DIRECTIONS FOR USE It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling. Read this label and the product package label before using this product. This Supplemental Label must be in possession of the user at the time of pesticide application. Follow all applicable directions, restrictions, Worker Protection Standard requirements, and precautions on the registered product label. MINT POUNDS OF MOCAP® 15% GRANULAR APPLICATION PEST CONTROLLED BROADCAST PER ACRE APPLICATION DIRECTIONS TIMING New Mint: Symphylans 20 Broadcast over the field and incorporate into the soil to Apply preplant a depth of at least 2 to 4 inches, during or immediately Nematodes 40 following application by mechanical means, including by rotary tiller, rotary hoe, springtooth harrow, or by double Mint Symphylans 20 discing, or by immediate application of 1 to 2 inches of Apply after last Mint Root Borer overhead irrigation. Repeat irrigation before soil dries. harvest of the growing Nematodes 40 season RESTRICTIONS AND PRECAUTIONS FOR MINT • Make only 1 MOCAP® 15G application per growing season (either preplant, or after last harvest of the growing season).
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Management of Pesticides and Diagnosis and Treatment Of
    * Revision of the“IPCS - Multilevel Course on the Safe Use of Pesticides and on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Presticide Poisoning, 1994” © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgement Part I. Overview 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives 2. Overview of the resource tool 2.1 Moduledescription 2.2 Training levels 2.3 Visual aids 2.4 Informationsources 3. Using the resource tool 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Training trainers 3.2.1 Organizational aspects 3.2.2 Coordinator’s preparation 3.2.3 Selection of participants 3.2.4 Before training trainers 3.2.5 Specimen module 3.3 Trainers 3.3.1 Trainer preparation 3.3.2 Selection of participants 3.3.3 Organizational aspects 3.3.4 Before a course 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Acaricide Mode of Action Classification: a Key to Effective Acaricide Resistance Management Insecticide Resistance Action Committee
    Acaricide Mode of Action Classification: A key to effective acaricide resistance management Insecticide Resistance Action Committee www.irac-online.org Introduction Effective IRM strategies: Sequences or alternations of MoA IRAC promotes the use of a Mode of Action (MoA) classification of All effective pesticide resistance management strategies seek to minimise the selection of resistance to any one type of MoA w MoA x MoA y MoA z MoA w MoA x insecticides and acaricides as the basis for effective and sustainable pesticide. In practice, alternations, sequences or rotations of compounds from different MoA groups provide sustainable and resistance management. Acaricides are allocated to specific groups based effective resistance management for acarine pests. This ensures that selection from compounds in the same MoA group is on their target site. Reviewed and re-issued periodically, the IRAC MoA minimised, and resistance is less likely to evolve. Sequence of acaricides through season classification list provides farmers, growers, advisors, extension staff, consultants and crop protection professionals witH a guide to the selection of Applications are often arranged into MoA spray windows or blocks that are defined by the stage of crop development and the biology of the pest species of concern. Local expert advice should acaricides and insecticides in resistance management programs. Effective always be followed witH regard to spray windows and timings. Several sprays may be possible witHin each spray window but it is generally essential to ensure that successive generations of the Resistance management of this type preserves the utility and diversity of pest are not treated witH compounds from the same MoA group.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Hydrol
    Supplement of Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2717–2737, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2717-2018-supplement © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Long-term temporal trajectories to enhance restoration efficiency and sustainability on large rivers: an interdisciplinary study David Eschbach et al. Correspondence to: David Eschbach ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. Table S1. Physico-chemical characteristics of 38 legacy and modern organic chemical pollutants (including 30 pesticides, the hexachlorobenzene and 7 polychlorinated biphenyls) a -1 a a Name Famille Type Solubility (mg.L ) KOC DT50 In water at 20°C (mg.L-1) [L.kg-1 of carbon] [Days] (2-Hydroxy)-terbutilazine Triazine Herbicide, microbiocide, Algicide 6.6 230.7944162 75.1 (Beta-)endosulfan organochlorine Insecticide 0.32 11500 50 2, 4 DDT Organochlorine Insecticide 0.006 151000 6200 4, 4 DDT Organochlorine Insecticide 0.006 151000 6200 Atrazine Triazine Herbicide 35 100 75 Atrazine-Desethyl Transformation product Transformation product - 24b 238b Azinphos-ethyl Organophosphate Insecticide/acaricide 4.5 1500 50 Carbendazime Benzimidazole Fungicide 8 264 40 Carbofuran Carbamate Insecticide, Nematicide, Acaricide 322 276 29 Chloropyrifos-methyle Organophosphate Insecticide/acaricide 2.74 4645 3 Chlorothalonil chloronitrile fongicide 0.81 850 22 Chlorpyrifos-ethyl Organophosphate Insecticide 1.05 8151 50 Cyproconazole Triazole
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological Resistance Alters Behavioral Response of Tetranychus Urticae to Acaricides Adekunle W
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Physiological resistance alters behavioral response of Tetranychus urticae to acaricides Adekunle W. Adesanya1,2*, Michael J. Beauchamp1, Mark D. Lavine2, Laura C. Lavine2, Fang Zhu 2,3 & Doug B. Walsh1,2 Multiple acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae continues to threaten crop production globally, justifying the need to adequately study resistance for sustainable pest management. Most studies on acaricide resistance have focused on the acute contact toxicity of acaricides with little or no information on the behavioral responses elicited after acaricide exposure. Furthermore, the impact of physiological resistance on these behavioral responses remains unknown in most pest species, including T. urticae. We tested the efect of acaricide resistance on contact toxicity, irritancy and repellency of mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor of complex I (MET-I) and mite growth inhibitor (MGI) acaricides on multiple T. urticae strains. We also tested whether acaricides with similar physiological target site/mode of action also elicit similar behavioral efects on T. urticae strains. MET-I acaricides (fenazaquin, fenpyroximate, and pyrabiden) and MGIs (clofentezine, hexythiazox and etoxazole) elicited a dose-dependent irritant and repellent efect on T. urticae. Selection of strains for physiological resistance to these acaricides afected the behavioral response of T. urticae, especially in MET-I resistant strains, that showed reduced irritancy and repellency to MET-I acaricides. Behavioral response also afected the oviposition of T. urticae, where strains generally showed preferential oviposition away from the acaricides. The outcome of this study highlights negative consequences of acaricide resistance that can potentially afect T. urticae management. In addition to a pesticide’s direct lethality, its sublethal efects can also afect its efcacy1.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases
    Integrated Pest Management GUIDE TO TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES Plant Protection Programs College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources Published by University of Missouri Extension IPM1032 This publication is part of a series of integrated pest CONTENTS management (IPM) manuals prepared by the Plant Protection Programs of the University of Missouri. Topics INTRODUCTION TO TICKS . 3 covered in the series include an introduction to scouting, Morphology . 4 weed identification and management, plant diseases, and Identification . .6 insects of field and horticultural crops. These IPM manuals Life cycle . .7 are available from MU Extension at the following address: Behavior . 8 Distribution and ecology . 10 Extension Publications MEDICALLY IMPORTANT TICKS . .12 2800 Maguire Blvd. Lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) . 12 Columbia, MO 65211 American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) .13 800-292-0969 Blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) . 13 Brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) . 14 Relapsing fever tick (Ornithodoros turicata) 14 Bat tick (Ornithodoros kelleyi) . .15 Author Richard M. Houseman TICK-BORNE DISEASES . .16 Associate Professor of Entomology Human ehrlichiosis . 16 University of Missouri Extension Rocky Mountain spotted fever . 17 Southern tick-associated rash illness . .17 Lyme disease . 18. On the cover Anaplasmosis . 18 Dorsal view of a female lone star tick, Tick-borne relapsing fever . 19 Amblyomma americanum. Photo credit: James Tularemia . 19. Gathany, CDC INDIVIDUAL PERSONAL PROTECTION . 20 Photo credits Tick bite prevention . .20 Tick checks . 22 All photos were provided by the author, unless Tick removal . 22 otherwise indicated. Self-monitoring and medical treatment . 23 Follow-up . 24 Credits Centers for Disease Control and Prevention INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) (CDC) OF TICK POPULATIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, ACTINOVATE STP FUNGICIDE,11/08/2017
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION November 8, 2017 J. Austin Burns, Ph.D. Regulatory Affairs Manager Monsanto Company 1300 I Street, NW Suite 450 East Washington, D.C. 20005 Subject: Non-PRIA (Pesticide Registration Improvement Act) Labeling and Formulation Amendment – Add nematicide applications to the label, add an alternate brand name to the label, update an inert ingredient description on the basic confidential statement of formula (CSF), and make other changes to the label and basic CSF (including those requested by the EPA) (e.g., clarify the application rates) Product Name: Actinovate STP Fungicide EPA Registration Number: 524-643 Date of Applications: April 4, 2017 OPP Decision Numbers: 528593 and 528594 Dear Dr. Burns: The amended labeling and Confidential Statement of Formula (CSF) referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, are acceptable. This non-PRIA amendment includes a change proposed in a labeling notification (OPP Decision No. 528594). The alternate brand name Actinovate STP Fungicide / Nematicide has been added to the registration, and our records have been updated accordingly. This approval does not affect any terms or conditions that were previously imposed on this registration. You continue to be subject to existing terms or conditions on your registration and any deadlines connected with them. Please note that the record for this product currently contains the following acceptable CSF: x Basic CSF dated 10/05/2017 Any CSFs other than that listed above are superseded/no longer valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1. List of the 33 Pesticide Residues Analyzed in Grapevine Leaves, Use Type, Chemical Group and Mode of Action. Molecule
    Table S1. List of the 33 pesticide residues analyzed in grapevine leaves, use type, chemical group and mode of action. CAS Num‐ Log P Molecule Formula Chemical group Use Type Mode of action ber (KOW) Acetamiprid 135410‐20‐7 C10H11ClN4 0.80 Neonicotinoid Insecticide Systemic Azoxystrobin 131860‐33‐8 C22H17N3O5 2.50 Strobilurin Fungicide Systemic Bifenthrin 82657‐04‐3 C23H22ClF3O2 6.00 Pyrethroid Acaricide, Insecticide Contact Boscalid 188425‐85‐6 C18H12Cl2N2O 2.96 Carboxamide Fungicide Systemic Carbendazim 10605‐21‐7 C9H9N3O2 1.52 Benzimidazole Fungicide Systemic Chlorpyriphos 2921‐88‐2 C9H11Cl3NO3PS 4.96 Organophosphorous Insecticide Contact Cypermethrin 52315‐07‐8 C22H19Cl2NO3 5.55 Pyrethroid Insecticide Contact Cyproconazole 113096‐99‐4 C15H18ClN3O 2.90 Triazole Fungicide Systemic Cyprodinil 121552‐61‐2 C14H15N3 3.59 Anilinopyrimidine Fungicide Systemic Deltamethrin 52918‐63‐5 C22H19Br2NO3 4.60 Pyrethroid Insecticide Contact Diazinon 333‐41‐5 C12H21N2O3PS 3.81 Organophosphorous Acaricide, Insecticide Contact Difenoconazole 119446‐68‐3 C19H17Cl2N3O3 4.40 Triazole Fungicide Systemic Dimethoate 60‐51‐5 C5H12NO3PS2 0.78 Organophosphorous Acaricide, Insecticide Systemic Fenazaquin 120928‐09‐8 C20H22N2O 5.51 Quinazoline Acaricide Contact Fenhexamid 126833‐17‐8 C14H17Cl2NO2 3.51 Hydroxyanilide Acaricide Translaminar Hexaconazole 79983‐71‐4 C14H17Cl2N3O 3.90 Triazole Fungicide Systemic Imazalil 35554‐44‐0 C14H14Cl2N2O 3.82 Imidazole Fungicide Systemic Imidacloprid 138261‐41‐3 C9H10ClN5O2 0.57 Neonicotinoid Insecticide Systemic Indoxacarb 173584‐44‐6
    [Show full text]