The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 10, 1915 Contents: ● Title Page ● Table of Contents ● Thirty-Third Meeting, January 25, 1915 ○ Col Henry Vassall and His Wife Penelope Vassall with some Account of His Slaves By Samuel Francis Batchelder ● Thirty-Fourth Meeting, April 27, 1915 ○ The Beginning of the First Church in Cambridge By Hollis Russell Bailey ○ Note on the Deacon's Books of the First Church by Henry Herbert Edes ○ The Longfellow Prize Essay, 1915: Descriptions of Nature in Longfellow's Poems By Margaret Charlton Black ● Thirty-Fifth Meeting, October 20, 1915 ○ Celebration of the One Hundredth Anniversary of the Birth of Richard Henry Dana ○ Introductory Remarks By Bishop Lawrence ○ Dana as a Man of Letters By Bliss Perry ○ Dana as a an Antislavery Leader By Moorefield Story ○ Dana as a Lawyer and Citizen By Joseph Hodges Choate ○ Appendix: Exhibit in Connection with the Dana Centenary ● Thirty-Sixth Meeting, October 26, 1915. Eleventh Annual Meeting ○ Annual Report of the Council ○ Annual Report of the Treasurer ○ Election of Officers ● Necrology ● Officers ● Committees ● Members ● By-Laws Illustrations ● Portrait of Henry Vassall. By Copley. Frontispiece ​ ● Facsimile of a Page from Henry Vassall's Expense Book ● Portrait of Penelope Vassall. By Copley. ● Facsimile of Penelope Vassall's Writing. (See p. 40 note.) ● Henry Vassall's Bookplate ● Residence of Rev. Thomas Hooker Built in 1633. ● From a Drawing by Miss E. S. Quincy About 1840 ● Portrait of Richard H. Dana (1815-1862). ● From a Photograph Taken in Paris in 1879 THE THIRTY-THIRD MEETING THE THIRTY-THIRD MEETING OF THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY was held on the 26th day of January, 1915, at 7.45 o'clock in the evening, at Craigie House, the residence of Miss Longfellow. The President, RICHARD HENRY DANA, presided. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved. Portraits of Henry Vassall and Penelope Royal Vassall, recently acquired by the President, were exhibited. SAMUEL FRANCIS BATCHELDER read an account of the originals of these portraits. ​COL. HENRY VASSALL [Paper Read at The Thirty-Third Meeting] THE Cambridge Loyalists or "Tories" have suffered a somewhat undeserved neglect at the hands of our historians. Numerous, opulent, cultivated, picturesque, and exceedingly interesting in themselves, they also form the outstanding figures in the village annals during the middle of the eighteenth century - annals which otherwise would be colorless to the vanishing-point. Economically they contributed vastly to the reputation and resources of the town, whole sections of which wore opened up and brought to a high state of development by their wealth, intelligence, and taste. Politically they were the conscientious upholders of that 5 realm of law and order against which their fellow countrymen saw fit to revolt, with results that long hung in the balance and that - had it not been for the unexpected folly of their leaders and the equally unexpected rise of a first-order genius among the revolutionists - might well have vindicated their position completely. Meantime they operated as the flywheel on the overheated engine of partisan passion, delaying and steadying its wilder impulses and preventing the ungoverned excesses into which it might otherwise have run. Socially and intellectually they brought to a primitive community, which had scarcely advanced beyond the Elizabethan era when it was founded, the amenities, comforts, and ideals of the highest civilization of the day, and thus paved the way for that cultured 1 elegance which was to distinguish the neighborhood for many years to come. ​ In the thin and vitiated ​ mental atmosphere that had felt no more stimulating influences than the meagre precepts of Harvard College (which itself was experiencing a time of weakness and change) they gave the first inspirations of a fuller and richer life. They were, in brief, the advance guard of those forces that have transformed 2 the isolated, bucolic hamlet ​ into a complex modern city, at once eagerly progressive and curiously ​ conservative. At the same time the scanty attention that has been paid to the Tories is not unnatural. Out of sight, ont of mind; and the less said about those into whose inheritance we have so coolly entered, the better. The adherents of a lost cause are soon forgotten amongst a democracy where success is the test and the justification of all things. Even the genealogist, struggling to ascend the local family-trees, passes by those temporary stocks that have left no scions among us to-day. Mostly exotic, they grafted them- 1 ​ By an attraction that deserves a better name than coincidence, both of the most famous men of letters that Cambridge has ever claimed fixed their abodes, it will be recalled, in mansions built by the Loyalists. 2 ​ The sympathetic student of pre-revolutionary Cambridge must hear constantly in mind the extreme diminutiveness of his field. The settled part of town was practically confined to the vicinity of Harvard College, and in 1765 contained a white population with the easily remembered total of 1492. Thus, instead of standing as now fourth or fifth in order of size, Cambridge was then about fortieth on the Massachusetts list, overwhelmingly and apparently hopelessly outranked by such important centres as Sutton, Scituate, Ipswich, and Rehoboth. The largest town after Boston was Marblehead. Cf. Benton, Early Census ​ Making in Mass. 6 selves, as it were, upon the growing community, throve, multiplied, and then, before the chilling breath of discord and revolution, suddenly withered away and vanished, leaving no roots, no fruits, and only here and there an empty husk. The dead leaves of their records have been suffered to whirl off into limbo. Their fibres never sank deeper than the superficial soil of New England life. The native population, differing from them in religion, in occupations, in habits, in philosophy, and in politics, at first tolerated them, then distrusted them, and at last feared and assailed them; and when they were extirpated spent nearly a century in obliterating their vestiges. 1 Of all that ghostly company no members are more difficult to trace, considering their numbers and​ ​ wealth, than the great family of the Vassalls. Like strange old-world galleons, they moored for a time in the pleasant summer waters of New England, enjoying and enriching themselves among the codfish; but with the first autumnal northeaster they dragged their anchors and drifted helplessly away before the blast, the angry waves closing over their wake, marked only by an occasional bit of wreckage or a fragment of flotsam jettisoned to lighten a sinking ship. Many of their friends among the Massachusetts Loyalists played memorable and manly parts in the troublous sixties and seventies of the revolutionary century - some are still notorious for a precisely opposite course. Not a few of their native-born neighbors, humble and uncouth as they may have seemed in the eyes of those fine gentry, are to-day vivid national figures and familiar household words. But the name of Vassall in New England is almost as if it had never been. A few stately countryseats, some musty court and registry ​ entries, an obscure lane in Cambridge, a township in the Maine forests, some scattered stones in long-closed churchyards, and a monument in King's Chapel to a London ancestor arc all that now preserve it from utter forgetfulness. For anything beyond these mechanical and artificial memorials, for any vital impression on the history of the time, for any tablet in the hall of fame (even in the Cambridge corner thereof), for any human interest, in legend, song, or story, we look in vain. 1 ​ Harris, the authority on the subject, enumerates no less than sixty-eight who bore the name in New England. 7 The very personalities of the heads of the house have perished, or become dim and uncertain. Their letters and diaries are lost. Scarcely a scrap of manuscript survives to show us their characteristics and activities, intimacies and antipathies, hopes and fears. Up to the present time we have not even known how they looked. For though prominent members of the class that most liberally patronized the praiseworthy efforts of the Colonial portrait painters, their likenesses, numerous as they must have been, were either carried away in their hegira, or have suffered a variety of ignominious fates, scorned as "nothing but pictures of those miserable old Tories." The portraits of Henry Vassall and his ​ ​ wife Penelope Royall, auspiciously recovered within the past twelvemonth from a descendant distant in ​ ​ more senses than one, have therefore a value even more unique than that always attaching to the work of the master hand that painted them.1 ​ 1 ​ The exhibition of these portraits before the Society was the occasion for the preparation of this paper. Their history after leaving Cambridge appears to be as follows: From Henry Vassall's daughter Elizabeth, who married Dr. Charles Russell, they passed to her child Rebecca, who married in 1793 David Pearce of Boston, and thence to his son Charles Russell Pearce. While in the custody of the last named, they were taken to Baltimore, about 1825. Through his daughter Elizabeth Vassall Pearce, who married Mr. Prentiss, they were transmitted to his granddaughter Elizabeth Vassall Prentiss, who married Oliver H. McCowen. In 1914 Mrs. McCowen, being about to remove from Baltimore to Burmah, offered them to the Cambridge Historical Society, and they were purchased by the president, Richard H. Dana, 3d. They are now hung in the Treasure Boom of the Harvard Library. The canvases of Henry Vassall and Penelope Royall are 25 by 30 and 15 by 17 1/2 inches respectively. When received they proved to be in excellent condition, needing only varnishing and a little retouching of the backgrounds.