DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington And Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC Document 19-1 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ) ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 15-2038 (RC) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) DECLARATION OF STUART C. MCPHAIL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I, STUART C. MCPHAIL, hereby declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that the following is true and correct: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia, California, and New York. I am admitted to practice before this Court pro hac vice and my application for admission to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is currently pending. I am counsel of record for Plaintiffs Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Melanie Sloan. I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, unless the context indicates otherwise. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy the website titled “Directory of Representatives” published by the United States House of Representatives, as it appeared on the website http://www.house.gov/representatives/ on July 21, 2016. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 are true and correct copies of the website titled “Political Nonprofits (Dark Money)” published by the Center for Responsive Politics, with either 1 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC Document 19-1 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 4 the “Cycle to Date” or “Total Cycle” metrics selected, as they appeared on the website http://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/nonprof_summ.php?cycle=2016&type=type&range =tot on July 21, 2016. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the article titled “Advertising surges in presidential race; dark money dominating Senate contests,” by Robert Maguire and published by the Center for Responsive Politics on May 13, 2016, as it appeared on the website http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/05/advertising-surges-in-presidential-race- dark-money-dominating-senate-contests/ on July 21, 2016. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the Brennan Center for Justice report titled “Secret Spending in the States” published June 26, 2016 and available at https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Secret_Spending_in_the_States.pdf. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the article titled “IRS approves tax-exempt status of Crossroads GPS after more than five years,” by Matea Gold and published by the Washington Post on February 9, 2016, as it appeared on the website https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/09/irs-approves-tax-exempt- status-of-crossroads-gps-after-more-than-five-years/ on July 21, 2016. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 are true and correct copies of FEC Summaries of Reports for Crossroads GPS providing summaries of Crossroads GPS’s independent expenditure reports for the two-year periods ending in 2012 and 2014, accessed through the FEC’s database available at http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do by searching for Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, as the summaries appeared on July 21, 2016. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 are true and correct copies of FEC Summaries of Reports for American Action Network providing summaries of American Action Network’s 2 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC Document 19-1 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 4 independent expenditure reports for the two-year periods ending 2012, 2014, and 2016 accessed through the FEC’s database available at http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommittee Detail.do by searching for American Action Network, as the summaries appeared on July 21, 2016. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of the website titled “Top Election Spenders” published by the Center for Responsive Politics, as it appeared on the website https://www.opensecrets.org/dark-money/top-election-spenders.php on July 21, 2016. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct excerpt of a copy of the Arizona Future Funds Form 990-EZ, filed with the IRS on February 12, 2014 and available through CitizenAudit.org. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy the conciliation agreement entered between Arizona Future Fund and the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission in In re Arizona Future Fund, MUR No. 14-014, on December 18, 2014. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a December 23, 2014 email sent from William B. Canfield III to Sara Larsen of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission and an attachment detailing Arizona Future Fund’s independent expenditures. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy the article “Inside the GOP’s Effort to Consolidate the Super Pac Universe,” by Reid Wilson and published by the Morning Consult on March 24, 2016, as it appeared on the website https://morningconsult.com/2016/03/24/inside-the-gops-effort-to-consolidate-the-super-pac- universe/ on July 21, 2016. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct advance copy of the article “Representing the Preferences of Donors, Partisans, and Voters in the US Senate,” by Michael J. 3 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC Document 19-1 Filed 07/28/16 Page 4 of 4 Barber and published by the Public Opinion Quarterly on March 16, 2016, as it appeared on the website http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/03/15/poq.nfw004.full.pdf on July 21, 2016. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct advance copy of the article “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” by Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page and published by Perspectives on Policy on September 18, 2016, as it appeared on the website https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/ gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf on July 21, 2016. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of the of Statement of Reasons of Vice Chairman Scott E. Thomas and Commissioners John Warren McGarry, Danny Lee McDonald, and Trevor Potter, issued in Matter Under Review 2804 and signed on July 27, 1992, available on the website http://www.fec.gov/disclosure_data/mur/2804_B.pdf. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of the Conciliation Agreement entered into by Taxpayer Network and the FEC on May 14, 2014 in the Matter Under Review 6413, available on the website http://eqs.fec.gov/eqsdocsMUR/14044353947.pdf. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 28, 2016 at Washington, D.C. /s/ Stuart McPhail Stuart C. McPhail 4 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC Document 19-2 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 24 Exhibit 1 7/21/2016 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC DocumentDirectory of Re p19-2resenta t iv eFileds · Hou s07/28/16e.gov Page 2 of 24 114th Congress, 2nd Session · The House is not in session Directory of Representatives Key to Room Codes Also referred to as a congressman or congresswoman, each representative is elected to a two­year term serving the CHOB: Cannon House Office Building people of a specific congressional district. The number of voting representatives in the House is fixed by law at no more than 435, proportionally representing the population of the 50 states. Currently, there are five delegates LHOB: Longworth House Office Building representing the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the RHOB: Rayburn House Office Building Northern Mariana Islands. A resident commissioner represents Puerto Rico. Learn more about representatives at The House Explained. View the campus map A Note About Room Numbering A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Alabama District Name Party Room Phone Committee Assignment 1 Byrne, Bradley R 119 CHOB 202­225­4931 Armed Services Education and the Workforce Rules 2 Roby, Martha R 442 CHOB 202­225­2901 Appropriations Select Committee on Benghazi 3 Rogers, Mike R 324 CHOB 202­225­3261 Agriculture Armed Services Homeland Security 4 Aderholt, Robert R 235 CHOB 202­225­4876 Appropriations 5 Brooks, Mo R 1230 LHOB 202­225­4801 Armed Services Foreign Affairs Science, Space, and Technology 6 Palmer, Gary R 206 CHOB 202­225­4921 Oversight and Government Science, Space, and Technology the Budget 7 Sewell, Terri A. D 1133 LHOB 202­225­2665 Financial Services Intelligence (Permanent) Alaska District Name Party Room Phone Committee Assignment At Large Young, Don R 2314 RHOB 202­225­5765 Natural Resources Transportation American Samoa District Name Party Room Phone Committee Assignment At Large Radewagen, Amata R 1339 LHOB 202­225­8577 Natural Resources Small Business Veterans' Affairs http://www.house.gov/representatives/ 1/23 7/21/2016 Case 1:15-cv-02038-RC DocumentDirectory of Re p19-2resenta t iv eFileds · Hou s07/28/16e.gov Page 3 of 24 Arizona District Name Party Room Phone Committee Assignment 1 Kirkpatrick, Ann D 201 CHOB 202­225­3361 Agriculture Transportation 2 McSally, Martha R 1029 LHOB 202­225­2542 Armed Services Homeland Security 3 Grijalva, Raul D 1511 LHOB 202­225­2435 Education and the Workforce Natural Resources 4 Gosar, Paul A. R 504 CHOB 202­225­2315 Natural Resources Oversight and Government 5 Salmon, Matt R 2349 RHOB 202­225­2635 Education and the Workforce Foreign Affairs 6 Schweikert, David R 409 CHOB 202­225­2190 Financial Services 7 Gallego, Ruben D 1218 LHOB 202­225­4065
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief of United States Senatorsenatorssss Sheldon Whitehouse and John Mccain As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents ______
    No. 11-1179 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _______________ AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP , INC ., F.K.A. WESTERN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP , INC ., ET AL ., Petitioners, v. STEVE BULLOCK , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA , ET AL ., Respondents . _______________ On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court of Montana _______________ BRIEF OF UNITED STATES SENATORSENATORSSSS SHELDON WHITEHOUSE AND JOHN MCCAIN AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _______________ NEAL KUMAR KATYAL Counsel of Record JUDITH E. COLEMAN HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 637-5528 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST .................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT APPLIED THE CORRECT LEGAL STANDARD TO THE FACTUAL RECORD BEFORE IT. ........................................................... 3 II. THE COURT SHOULD IN ALL EVENTS DECLINE PETITIONERS’ INVITATION TO SUMMARILY REVERSE. ............................... 5 A. Political Spending After Citizens United Demonstrates that Coordination and Disclosure Rules Do Not Impose a Meaningful Check on the System. ................... 8 B. Unlimited, Coordinated and Undisclosed Spending Creates a Strong Potential for Quid Pro Quo Corruption. ........ 17 C. The Appearance of Corruption
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC
    The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC Financing and Independent Expenditures Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut [email protected] Presented at the Meeting of the Campaign Finance Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017 (revised June 2017). 1 Exe cutive Summa ry Super PACs have grown in number, wealth, and influence since the Supreme Court laid the foundation for their formation in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the decisions reached by other courts and the FEC clarified the boundaries of their political participation. Their objectives and activities also have evolved. Super PACs are not nearly as monolithic as they have been portrayed by the media. While it is inaccurate to characterize them as representative of American society, it is important to recognize that they vary in wealth, mission, structure, affiliation, political perspective, financial transparency, and how and where they participate in political campaigns. Organizational characteristics influence super PAC financing, including the sums they raise. Organizational characteristics also affect super PAC independent expenditures, including the amounts spent, the elections in which they are made, the candidates targeted, and the tone of the messages delivered. The super PAC community is not static. It is likely to continue to evolve in response to legal challenges; regulatory decisions; the objectives of those who create, administer, and finance them; and changes in the broader political environment. 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Data and Methods 4 III. Emergence and Development 7 IV. Organizational Characteristics 11 A. Finances 11 B. Mission 14 C. Affiliation 17 D. Financial Transparency 19 E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Irving Moskowitz, Controversial Backer of Israeli Settlements, Gives $1 Million to Anti- Obama Super PAC
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794264 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 From: H <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:12 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Fw: Worth reading. From: sbwhoeop [mailto Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:25 AM Subject: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/12/irving-moskowitz-israeli-settlements-anti-obama-super-pac_n_1416041.html 14161 Blumenthal paulblumenthalnhuffincitonpost.com Irving Moskowitz, Controversial Backer Of Israeli Settlements, Gives $1 Million To Anti- Obama Super PAC Posted: 04/12/2012 9:21 am By Paul Blumenthal WASHINGTON -- Even in the era of unbridled campaign contributions, Irving Moskowitz's $1 million donation in February to American Crossroads, the Karl Rove-linked super PAC, is eye-catching. A retired physician who made a fortune purchasing hospitals and running bingo and casino operations in the economically depressed California town of Hawaiian Gardens, Moskowitz is well- known to those who follow the Israel-Palestine conflict. His contributions to far-right Jewish settler groups, questionable archaeological projects and widespread land purchases in East Jerusalem and the West Bank have routinely inflamed the region over the past four decades and, according to many familiar with the conflict, made him a key obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Now, at age 83, Moskowitz has turned his money on the American political realm in a more prominent fashion than ever before, funding "birther" groups that question the legitimacy of President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and others that stoke fears about the president's alleged ties to "radical Islam." Although he has funded Republican politicians and organizations in the past, his $1 million donation to American Crossroads is his biggest contribution to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Session Report
    2014 End of Session Report ARIZONA PEST PROFESSIONALS ORGANIZATION Prepared by: Capitol Consulting, LLC 818 N. 1st Street Phoenix, AZ 85004 www.azcapitolconsulting.com P a g e | 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dear AZPPO Members: Sine Die! On April 24, 2014, the 51st Arizona Legislature adjourned sine die at 1:46 AM after 101 days in session. By rule a session can last 100 days with provisions in place for extending it. As you recall, those provisions were put to the test last year with the uncomfortably long 151-day session. The 51st Legislature, 2nd Regular Session officially commenced January 13, 2014. A total of 1,205 bills were introduced by the legislature and of those, 276 have been signed by Governor Janice K. Brewer. The session began as usual with the governor announcing policy priorities for the year during the State of the State address. The governor’s priorities were perhaps met with a little more attentiveness from the legislature after a rocky end to the 2013 session. As you may recall part of the Governor’s ambitious 2013 agenda meant crossing political boundaries at the expense of the most conservative within the state’s GOP. In 2013, the governor muscled her way to pass the Medicaid expansion. After weeks of stalled budget negotiations, the Governor called a Special Legislative Session in an effort to bypass House and Senate leadership and call Medicaid to question. The move sparked rumors of a legislative coup and drove a wedge straight through the Republican caucus, dividing the moderate and conservative members. During her final State of the State address in January, Governor Brewer focused on two priorities including a complete overhaul of the state’s defunct child protective services and a proposal to create new incentives for manufactures to set up shop in Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and Their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond
    12 The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond Michael E. Toner and Karen E. Trainer The 2020 presidential and congressional election was the most expensive election in American history, shattering previous fundraising and spending records. Total spending on the 2020 election totaled an estimated $14 bil- lion, which was more than double the amount spent during the 2016 cycle and more than any previous election in U.S. history. 1 The historic 2020 spending tally was more than was spent in the previous two election cycles combined.2 Moreover, former Vice President Joseph Biden and Senator Kamala Harris made fundraising history in 2020 as their presidential campaign became the first campaign in history to raise over $1 billion in a single election cycle, with a total of $1.1 billion.3 For their part, President Trump and Vice Presi- dent Pence raised in excess of $700 million for their presidential campaign, more than double the amount that they raised in 2016.4 The record amount of money expended on the 2020 election was also fu- eled by a significant increase in spending by outside groups such as Super PACs as well as enhanced congressional candidate fundraising. Political party expenditures increased in 2020, but constituted a smaller share of total electoral spending. Of the $14 billion total, approximately $6.6 billion was spent in connection with the presidential race and $7.2 billion was expended at the congressional level.5 To put those spending amounts into perspective, the $7.2 billion tally at the congressional level nearly equals the GDP of Monaco.6 More than $1 billion of the $14 billion was spent for online advertising on platforms such as Facebook and Google.7 203 204 Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Briefs
    Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 1 of 46 No. 18-16663 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ___________________ CITY OF OAKLAND; and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. B.P. P.L.C.; CHEVRON CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILLIPS; EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC; and DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from The United States District Court, Northern District of California Case Nos. 3:17-cv-06011-WHA, 3:17-cv-06012-WHA (Hon. William H. Alsup) ___________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE SENATORS SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, MAZIE K. HIRONO, EDWARD J. MARKEY, AND KAMALA D. HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES AND REVERSAL ___________________ Gerson H. Smoger Robert S. Peck SMOGER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL 13250 Branch View Ln. LITIGATION, P.C. Dallas, TX 75234 455 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. (972) 243-5297 Washington, DC 20001 (510) 531-4529 (202) 944-2874 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amici Curiae Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 2 of 46 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26.1, amici curiae certify that they are individuals and not corporations. i Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 3 of 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT …………………………………….i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..……………………………………………………..iv AMICI CURIAE’S IDENTITY, INTEREST, AND AUTHORITY TO FILE ……1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ……………………………………………………4 ARGUMENT ………………………………………………………………………5 I. THE LOWER COURT’S DECISION WITH RESPECT TO THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE RELIED ON INCOMPLETE INFORMATION AS TO DEFENDANTS’ OWN EFFORTS TO PREVENT POLICIES THAT ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE ………………………...5 A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Conservative
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Conservative Politics in a Time of “Fake News” and Irrelevant Truths A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Ian Mullins Committee in Charge: Professor Isaac Martin, Chair Professor Richard Biernacki Professor Amy Binder Professor Robert Horwitz Professor Christena Turner 2018 Copyright Ian Mullins, 2018 All Rights Reserved The Dissertation of Ian Mullins is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2018 iii EPIGRAPH "Alas," said the mouse, "the whole world is growing smaller every day. At the beginning it was so big that I was afraid, I kept running and running, and I was glad when I saw walls far away to the right and left, but these long walls have narrowed so quickly that I am in the last chamber already, and there in the corner stands the trap that I must run into." "You only need to change your direction," said the cat, and ate it up. Franz Kafka, A Little Fable iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ............................................................................................................................... iii Epigraph ......................................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ v
    [Show full text]
  • Television Advertising in 2012
    Television Advertising in 2012 WMP Directors: Erika Franklin Fowler, Michael M. Franz & Travis N. Ridout Brought to you by: Thanks also to: Kantar Media/CMAG Frequency Data Online Coding Tool Data We Collect • Sponsor (candidate, party, interest group) • Tone (positive, negative, contrast) • Issue themes, personal traits/adjectives & policy vs. personality balance of spot • Major politician mentions & tone • Mentions of party affiliation, magic words, etc. • Emotional appeals, music, voiceovers TRENDS IN VOLUME, COST, AND SPONSORSHIP Volume and Cost of Ads in 2012 Race Ad Airings Est. Cost House 685,787 $443,105,900 Senate 952,135 $558,121,120 President 1,431,939 $950,436,980 All federal 3,042,861 $1,923,754,550 Source: Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Ads in Presidential Race (6/1 to Election Day) 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2004 2008 2012 Source: Wisconsin Advertising Project and Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Interest Group Activity Skyrockets in Presidential Primaries 59.1% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 14.5% 10.0% 4.1% 2.8% 0.0% 2000 2004 2008 2012 Source: Wisconsin Advertising Project and Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Top Advertisers in General Election Barack Obama 511,513 Mitt Romney 207,984 American Crossroads 81,553 Restore Our Future, Inc. 62,557 Crossroads GPS 61,610 Priorities USA Action 58,990 Americans for Prosperity 40,465 RNC 35,825 RNC & Romney 33,456 Americans for Job Security 10,410 American Future Fund 7,438 DNC & Obama 7,210 Source: Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Money Isn’t Everything 700,000 600,000 +$1M 500,000 400,000 Pro-Obama 300,000 Pro-Romney 200,000 100,000 - Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Pacs and 501(C) Groups in the 2016 Election
    Super PACs and 501(c) Groups in the 2016 Election David B. Magleby* Brigham Young University Paper presented at the “State of the Parties: 2016 and Beyond”, Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics, University of Akron. November 9-10, 2017. *I would like to acknowledge the research assistance of Hyrum Clarke, Ben Forsgren, John Geilman, Jake Jensen, Jacob Nielson, Blake Ringer, Alena Smith, Wen Je (Fred) Tan, and Sam Williams all BYU undergraduates. Data made available by the Center for Responsive Politics was helpful as were two interviews with Robert Maguire, whose expertise in political nonprofits was informative. 1 Super PACs and 501(c) Groups in the 2067 Election David B. Magleby Brigham Young University In only a short period of time, Super PACs have come to be one of the most important parts of American electoral politics. They raise and spend large sums of money in competitive federal elections. They have become fully integrated teammates with candidates, party leaders, and interest groups. While initially they were most visible in paying for television advertising, by 2016 they expanded their scope by providing a wide variety of campaign services once thought to be funded by candidate campaign committees (campaign events) or party committees, (get-out-the-vote, voter registration, list development). Where does the money come from that funds Super PACs and other outside groups? While much of the attention on sources of funding for Super PACs was initially on corporations and unions, the reality has been that most of the funding for Super PACs has been individuals. Publicly traded corporations have been infrequent funders of Super PACs, while unions have been more active in using Super PACs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairwoman Maloney's Opening Statement on Hr 8109
    Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney Committee on Oversight and Reform Full Committee Business Meeting Opening Statement on H.R. 8901, the Nonpartisan Postmaster General Act September 17, 2020 The next bill we will be considering is H.R. 8109, the Nonpartisan Postmaster General Act. The United States Postal Service is one of our nation’s most trusted institutions. It dates to the very founding of our country and consistently receives the highest rating of federal agencies from the public Every day, it provides millions of people with access to critical mail, medications, and especially in this unique election year, mail-in ballots. We are six months into the worst pandemic in a century. Millions of people are stuck in their homes and rely upon the Postal Service for access to critical contact and supplies. Veterans and America’s seniors rely heavily upon the Postal Service, especially during these trying times, for access to medications they need to live and remain healthy. A well-funded, independent Postal Service has never been more necessary. The faith of the American public in Postal Service is paramount, particularly in a year when hundreds of millions of ballots will be cast by mail. That is why it is so critical that the Postal Service remain free from partisan politics. Fifty years ago, Congress attempted to insulate the Postal Service from political infighting by passing the Postal Reorganization Act to ensure that the Postal Service is, and I quote, “an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States.” Unfortunately, that independence is now being threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
    Case 1:16-cv-00259-BAH Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ) ETHICS IN WASHINGTON ) 455 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Sixth Floor ) Washington, D.C. 20001, ) ) NICHOLAS MEZLAK ) 5707 Forest Ave. ) Civil Action No. Parma, OH 44129, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMISSION ) 999 E Street, N.W. ) Washington, D.C. 20463, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF 1. This is an action for injunctive and declaratory relief under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (“FECA” or “the Act”), 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(C), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706, challenging as arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and contrary to law the dismissal by the Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) of an administrative complaint by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) and Nicholas Mezlak (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (“Crossroads GPS”), Steven Law, Karl Rove, Haley Barbour, and Caleb Crosby for their failure to comply with the FECA’s disclosure requirements for those making independent expenditures. This action further challenges a regulation promulgated by the FEC, 11 C.F.R. § 109.10(e)(1)(vi), as the regulation is arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to 1 Case 1:16-cv-00259-BAH Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 2 of 28 law in violation of 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(C) and 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) because it is inconsistent with a provision of the FECA, 52 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]