Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Gene GRIK3 SER310ALA Functional Polymorphism Is Related to Delirium Tremens in Alcoholics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thyroid Hormone Influences Brain Gene Expression Programs And
Molecular Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0281-4 ARTICLE Thyroid hormone influences brain gene expression programs and behaviors in later generations by altering germ line epigenetic information 1 2,3 1 1 1 M. Elena Martinez ● Christine W. Duarte ● J. Patrizia Stohn ● Aldona Karaczyn ● Zhaofei Wu ● 1 1,3,4 Victoria E DeMambro ● Arturo Hernandez Received: 30 March 2018 / Revised: 16 August 2018 / Accepted: 26 September 2018 © Springer Nature Limited 2018 Abstract Genetic factors do not fully account for the relatively high heritability of neurodevelopmental conditions, suggesting that non-genetic heritable factors contribute to their etiology. To evaluate the potential contribution of aberrant thyroid hormone status to the epigenetic inheritance of neurological phenotypes, we examined genetically normal F2 generation descendants of mice that were developmentally overexposed to thyroid hormone due to a Dio3 mutation. Hypothalamic gene expression profiling in postnatal day 15 F2 descendants on the paternal lineage of ancestral male and female T3-overexposed mice 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: revealed, respectively, 1089 and 1549 differentially expressed genes. A large number of them, 675 genes, were common to both sets, suggesting comparable epigenetic effects of thyroid hormone on both the male and female ancestral germ lines. Oligodendrocyte- and neuron-specific genes were strongly overrepresented among genes showing, respectively, increased and decreased expression. Altered gene expression extended to other brain regions and was associated in adulthood with decreased anxiety-like behavior, increased marble burying and reduced physical activity. The sperm of T3-overexposed male ancestors revealed significant hypomethylation of CpG islands associated with the promoters of genes involved in the early development of the central nervous system. -
A Guide to Glutamate Receptors
A guide to glutamate receptors 1 Contents Glutamate receptors . 4 Ionotropic glutamate receptors . 4 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 4 - Function ............................................................................................................ 5 - AMPA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - NMDA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - Kainate receptors ............................................................................................... 6 Metabotropic glutamate receptors . 8 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 - Function ............................................................................................................ 9 - Group I: mGlu1 and mGlu5. .9 - Group II: mGlu2 and mGlu3 ................................................................................. 10 - Group III: mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8 ............................................................ 10 Protocols and webinars . 11 - Protocols ......................................................................................................... 11 - Webinars ......................................................................................................... 12 References and further reading . 13 Excitatory synapse pathway -
Glycine Activated Ion Channel Subunits Encoded by Ctenophore
Glycine activated ion channel subunits encoded by PNAS PLUS ctenophore glutamate receptor genes Robert Albersteina, Richard Greya, Austin Zimmeta, David K. Simmonsb, and Mark L. Mayera,1 aLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurophysiology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and bThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL 32080 Edited by Christopher Miller, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, and approved September 2, 2015 (received for review July 13, 2015) Recent genome projects for ctenophores have revealed the subunits and glutamate to GluN2 subunits for activation of ion presence of numerous ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) in channel gating (12, 14–17), as well as depolarization to relieve + Mnemiopsis leidyi and Pleurobrachia bachei, among our earliest ion channel block by extracellular Mg2 (18, 19). The initial metazoan ancestors. Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analy- annotation of the M. leidyi genome identified 16 candidate iGluR sis show that these form a distinct clade from the well-characterized genes (4), whereas in the draft genome of P. bachei, 14 iGluRs AMPA, kainate, and NMDA iGluR subtypes found in vertebrates. were annotated as kainate-like receptors (5). In view of growing Although annotated as glutamate and kainate receptors, crystal interest in the molecular evolution of ion channels and receptors, structures of the ML032222a and PbiGluR3 ligand-binding domains and the pivotal role that ctenophores play in our current un- (LBDs) reveal endogenous glycine in the binding pocket, whereas derstanding of nervous system development (20), we initiated a ligand-binding assays show that glycine binds with nanomolar af- structural and functional characterization of glutamate receptors finity; biochemical assays and structural analysis establish that glu- expressed in both species. -
Interplay Between Gating and Block of Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
brain sciences Review Interplay between Gating and Block of Ligand-Gated Ion Channels Matthew B. Phillips 1,2, Aparna Nigam 1 and Jon W. Johnson 1,2,* 1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; [email protected] (M.B.P.); [email protected] (A.N.) 2 Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(412)-624-4295 Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Drugs that inhibit ion channel function by binding in the channel and preventing current flow, known as channel blockers, can be used as powerful tools for analysis of channel properties. Channel blockers are used to probe both the sophisticated structure and basic biophysical properties of ion channels. Gating, the mechanism that controls the opening and closing of ion channels, can be profoundly influenced by channel blocking drugs. Channel block and gating are reciprocally connected; gating controls access of channel blockers to their binding sites, and channel-blocking drugs can have profound and diverse effects on the rates of gating transitions and on the stability of channel open and closed states. This review synthesizes knowledge of the inherent intertwining of block and gating of excitatory ligand-gated ion channels, with a focus on the utility of channel blockers as analytic probes of ionotropic glutamate receptor channel function. Keywords: ligand-gated ion channel; channel block; channel gating; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; ionotropic glutamate receptor; AMPA receptor; kainate receptor; NMDA receptor 1. Introduction Neuronal information processing depends on the distribution and properties of the ion channels found in neuronal membranes. -
Cellular Trafficking of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
npg Acta Pharmacol Sin 2009 Jun; 30 (6): 656–662 Review Cellular trafficking of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors Paul A ST JOHN* Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) play critical roles throughout the body. Precise regulation of the cellular loca- tion and availability of nAChRs on neurons and target cells is critical to their proper function. Dynamic, post-translational regulation of nAChRs, particularly control of their movements among the different compartments of cells, is an important aspect of that regulation. A combination of new information and new techniques has the study of nAChR trafficking poised for new breakthroughs. Keywords: membrane traffic; protein traffic; biosynthesis; endocytosis; endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2009) 30: 656–662; doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.76 Introduction ways, but two particular perturbations have been especially well studied and exert their effects at least in part by altering Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) mediate the trafficking of nAChRs: 1) denervation changes the total synaptic transmission in the CNS, in autonomic ganglia, and number, the distribution, and the turnover rate of nAChRs in at neuromuscular junctions and other peripheral synapses. skeletal muscle; 2) prolonged exposure to nicotine increases The functional properties of these synapses differ, but in each the total number of nAChRs in neurons. Several of the stud- case, properly functional signaling requires cellular control ies reviewed here addressed the mechanisms by which these of the number, type, and location of nAChRs. Trafficking treatments alter nAChR trafficking. Other authors in this of nAChRs – the movement of nAChRs between compart- special issue will address other aspects of the effects of nico- ments of a cell, including the cell's biosynthetic and degrada- tine on nAChRs. -
Kainate Receptors Depress Excitatory Synaptic Transmission at CA33CA1 Synapses in the Hippocampus Via a Direct Presynaptic Action
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2001, 21(9):2958–2966 Kainate Receptors Depress Excitatory Synaptic Transmission at CA33CA1 Synapses in the Hippocampus via a Direct Presynaptic Action Matthew Frerking,1 Dietmar Schmitz,1 Qiang Zhou,1 Joshua Johansen,2 and Roger A. Nicoll1,2 Departments of 1Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and 2Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0450 Kainate receptor activation depresses synaptic release of neu- excitation and subsequent release of a neuromodulator. Pre- rotransmitter at a number of synapses in the CNS. The mech- synaptic depolarization, achieved via increasing extracellular anism underlying this depression is controversial, and both K ϩ, caused a depression of the presynaptic fiber volley and an ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms have been sug- increase in the frequency of miniature EPSCs. Neither effect gested. We report here that the AMPA/kainate receptor ago- was observed with DA, suggesting that DA does not depress nists domoate (DA) and kainate (KA) cause a presynaptic de- transmission via a presynaptic depolarization. However, the pression of glutamatergic transmission at CA33CA1 synapses effects of DA were abolished by the G-protein inhibitors in the hippocampus, which is not blocked by the AMPA recep- N-ethylmaleimide and pertussis toxin. These results suggest tor antagonist GYKI 53655 but is blocked by the AMPA/KA that KA receptor activation depresses synaptic transmission at receptor antagonist CNQX. Neither a blockade of interneuronal this synapse via a direct, presynaptic, metabotropic action. discharge nor antagonists of several neuromodulators affect Key words: domoate; kainate; metabotropic; presynaptic; the depression, suggesting that it is not the result of indirect hippocampus; CA1 Neurotransmitter receptors in the CNS can be separated into two use-dependent depression. -
Gene Expression Studies in Depression Development and Treatment
Mariani et al. Translational Psychiatry (2021) 11:354 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01469-6 Translational Psychiatry REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Gene expression studies in Depression development and treatment: an overview of the underlying molecular mechanisms and biological processes to identify biomarkers Nicole Mariani 1, Nadia Cattane2,CarminePariante 1 and Annamaria Cattaneo 2,3 Abstract A combination of different risk factors, such as genetic, environmental and psychological factors, together with immune system, stress response, brain neuroplasticity and the regulation of neurotransmitters, is thought to lead to the development of major depressive disorder (MDD). A growing number of studies have tried to investigate the underlying mechanisms of MDD by analysing the expression levels of genes involved in such biological processes. These studies have shown that MDD is not just a brain disorder, but also a body disorder, and this is mainly due to the interplay between the periphery and the Central Nervous System (CNS). To this purpose, most of the studies conducted so far have mainly dedicated to the analysis of the gene expression levels using postmortem brain tissue as well as peripheral blood samples of MDD patients. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature on candidate gene expression alterations and the few existing transcriptomics studies in MDD focusing on inflammation, neuroplasticity, neurotransmitters and stress-related genes. Moreover, we focused our attention on studies, which have investigated 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; mRNA levels as biomarkers to predict therapy outcomes. This is important as many patients do not respond to antidepressant medication or could experience adverse side effects, leading to the interruption of treatment. -
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material Table S1: Significant downregulated KEGGs pathways identified by DAVID following exposure to five cinnamon- based phenylpropanoids (p < 0.05). p-value Term: Genes (Benjamini) Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction: FASLG, TNFSF14, CXCL11, IL11, FLT3LG, CCL3L1, CCL3L3, CXCR6, XCR1, 2.43 × 105 RTEL1, CSF2RA, TNFRSF17, TNFRSF14, CCNL2, VEGFB, AMH, TNFRSF10B, INHBE, IFNB1, CCR3, VEGFA, CCR2, IL12A, CCL1, CCL3, CXCL5, TNFRSF25, CCR1, CSF1, CX3CL1, CCL7, CCL24, TNFRSF1B, IL12RB1, CCL21, FIGF, EPO, IL4, IL18R1, FLT1, TGFBR1, EDA2R, HGF, TNFSF8, KDR, LEP, GH2, CCL13, EPOR, XCL1, IFNA16, XCL2 Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction: OPRM1, THRA, GRIK1, DRD2, GRIK2, TACR2, TACR1, GABRB1, LPAR4, 9.68 × 105 GRIK5, FPR1, PRSS1, GNRHR, FPR2, EDNRA, AGTR2, LTB4R, PRSS2, CNR1, S1PR4, CALCRL, TAAR5, GABRE, PTGER1, GABRG3, C5AR1, PTGER3, PTGER4, GABRA6, GABRA5, GRM1, PLG, LEP, CRHR1, GH2, GRM3, SSTR2, Chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic CHRM3, GRIA1, MC2R, P2RX2, TBXA2R, GHSR, HTR2C, TSHR, LHB, GLP1R, OPRD1 Hematopoietic cell lineage: IL4, CR1, CD8B, CSF1, FCER2, GYPA, ITGA2, IL11, GP9, FLT3LG, CD38, CD19, DNTT, 9.29 × 104 GP1BB, CD22, EPOR, CSF2RA, CD14, THPO, EPO, HLA-DRA, ITGA2B Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction: IL6ST, IL21R, IL19, TNFSF15, CXCR3, IL15, CXCL11, TGFB1, IL11, FLT3LG, CXCL10, CCR10, XCR1, RTEL1, CSF2RA, IL21, CCNL2, VEGFB, CCR8, AMH, TNFRSF10C, IFNB1, PDGFRA, EDA, CXCL5, TNFRSF25, CSF1, IFNW1, CNTFR, CX3CL1, CCL5, TNFRSF4, CCL4, CCL27, CCL24, CCL25, CCL23, IFNA6, IFNA5, FIGF, EPO, AMHR2, IL2RA, FLT4, TGFBR2, EDA2R, -
Functional Kainate-Selective Glutamate Receptors in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons (Excitatory Amino Acid Receptors/Hippocampus) JUAN LERMA*, ANA V
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 11688-11692, December 1993 Neurobiology Functional kainate-selective glutamate receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons (excitatory amino acid receptors/hippocampus) JUAN LERMA*, ANA V. PATERNAIN, JosE R. NARANJO, AND BRITT MELLSTR6M Departamento de Plasticidad Neural, Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientfficas, Avenida Doctor Arce 37, 28002-Madrid, Spain Communicated by Michael V. L. Bennett, September 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Glutamate mediates fast synaptic transmis- experiments, the regional distribution of high-affinity sion at the majority of excitatory synapses throughout the [3H]kainate binding sites does not match the AMPA receptor central nervous system by interacting with different types of distribution but corresponds well to the brain areas with high receptor channels. Cloning of glutamate receptors has pro- susceptibility to the neurotoxic actions of kainate (e.g., vided evidence for the existence of several structurally related hippocampal CA3 field) (13). However, patch-clamp record- subunit families, each composed of several members. It has ings from adult hippocampal neurons have revealed that been proposed that KA1 and KA2 and GluR-5, GluR-6, and native glutamate receptors are similar to the AMPA-type GluR-7 families represent subunit classes of high-affinity kain- recombinant glutamate receptors expressed from cDNA ate receptors and that in vivo different kainate receptor sub- clones but have failed so far to detect receptor channels ofthe types might be constructed from these subunits in heteromeric kainate type (14, 15). The only apparently high-affinity kain- assembly. However, despite some indications from autoradio- ate receptor channels have been found in the peripheral graphic studies and binding data in brain membranes, no nervous system (16, 17), although they are also activated by functional pure kainate receptors have so far been detected in AMPA. -
Identification of Key Genes and Pathways Involved in Response To
Deng et al. Biol Res (2018) 51:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-018-0174-7 Biological Research RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Identifcation of key genes and pathways involved in response to pain in goat and sheep by transcriptome sequencing Xiuling Deng1,2†, Dong Wang3†, Shenyuan Wang1, Haisheng Wang2 and Huanmin Zhou1* Abstract Purpose: This aim of this study was to investigate the key genes and pathways involved in the response to pain in goat and sheep by transcriptome sequencing. Methods: Chronic pain was induced with the injection of the complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) in sheep and goats. The animals were divided into four groups: CFA-treated sheep, control sheep, CFA-treated goat, and control goat groups (n 3 in each group). The dorsal root ganglions of these animals were isolated and used for the construction of a cDNA= library and transcriptome sequencing. Diferentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identifed in CFA-induced sheep and goats and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed. Results: In total, 1748 and 2441 DEGs were identifed in CFA-treated goat and sheep, respectively. The DEGs identi- fed in CFA-treated goats, such as C-C motif chemokine ligand 27 (CCL27), glutamate receptor 2 (GRIA2), and sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 3 (SCN3A), were mainly enriched in GO functions associated with N-methyl- D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, infammatory response, and immune response. The DEGs identifed in CFA-treated sheep, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-related DEGs (gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor gamma 3 subunit [GABRG3], GABRB2, and GABRB1), SCN9A, and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), were mainly enriched in GO functions related to neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, NMDA receptor, and defense response. -
Kainate Receptor-Mediated Depression of Glutamate Release
Article Kainate Receptor‐Mediated Depression of Glutamate Release Involves Protein Kinase A in the Cerebellum Rafael Falcón‐Moya, Pilar Losada‐Ruiz and Antonio Rodríguez‐Moreno * Laboratorio de Neurociencia Celular y Plasticidad, Departamento de Fisiología, Anatomía y Biología Celular, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES‐41013 Sevilla, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel: +34‐95497‐7393 Received: 20 July 2019; Accepted: 23 August 2019; Published: 23 August 2019 Abstract: Kainate (KA) receptors (KAR) have important modulatory roles of synaptic transmission. In the cerebellum, the action mechanisms of KAR‐mediated glutamatergic depression are unknown. We studied these mechanisms by recording evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs) from cerebellar slices using the whole‐cell configuration of the patch‐clamp technique. We observed that 3 μM KA decreased the amplitude of eEPSCs and increased the number of failures at the synapses established between parallel fibers (PF) and Purkinje neurons, and the effect was antagonized by NBQX under the condition where AMPA receptors were previously blocked. The inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) suppressed the effect of KAR activation on eEPSC, and effect was not prevented by protein kinase C inhibitors. Furthermore, in the presence of Pertussis toxin, the depression of glutamate release mediated by KAR activation was prevented, invoking the participation of a Gi/o protein in this modulation. Finally, the KAR‐mediated depression of glutamate release was not prevented by blocking calcium‐permeable KARs or by treatments that affect calcium release from intracellular stores. We conclude that KARs present at these synapses mediate an inhibition of glutamate release through a mechanism that involves the activation of G‐protein and protein kinase A. -
Stem Cells and Ion Channels
Stem Cells International Stem Cells and Ion Channels Guest Editors: Stefan Liebau, Alexander Kleger, Michael Levin, and Shan Ping Yu Stem Cells and Ion Channels Stem Cells International Stem Cells and Ion Channels Guest Editors: Stefan Liebau, Alexander Kleger, Michael Levin, and Shan Ping Yu Copyright © 2013 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in “Stem Cells International.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Com- mons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editorial Board Nadire N. Ali, UK Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Israel Pranela Rameshwar, USA Anthony Atala, USA Pavla Jendelova, Czech Republic Hannele T. Ruohola-Baker, USA Nissim Benvenisty, Israel Arne Jensen, Germany D. S. Sakaguchi, USA Kenneth Boheler, USA Sue Kimber, UK Paul R. Sanberg, USA Dominique Bonnet, UK Mark D. Kirk, USA Paul T. Sharpe, UK B. Bunnell, USA Gary E. Lyons, USA Ashok Shetty, USA Kevin D. Bunting, USA Athanasios Mantalaris, UK Igor Slukvin, USA Richard K. Burt, USA Pilar Martin-Duque, Spain Ann Steele, USA Gerald A. Colvin, USA EvaMezey,USA Alexander Storch, Germany Stephen Dalton, USA Karim Nayernia, UK Marc Turner, UK Leonard M. Eisenberg, USA K. Sue O’Shea, USA Su-Chun Zhang, USA Marina Emborg, USA J. Parent, USA Weian Zhao, USA Josef Fulka, Czech Republic Bruno Peault, USA Joel C. Glover, Norway Stefan Przyborski, UK Contents Stem Cells and Ion Channels, Stefan Liebau,