Southwestern Journal of Theology Anabaptistica
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Anabaptistica Southwestern Journal of Theology ANABAPTISTICA Southwestern Journal of Theology EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Paige Patterson, President, Professor of Theology, and L.R. Scarborough Chair of Evangelism (“Chair of Fire”) MANAGING EDITOR Terry L. Wilder, Professor and Wesley Harrison Chair of New Testament EDITORIAL BOARD Jason G. Duesing, Vice President for Strategic Initiatives and Assistant Professor of Historical Theology Keith E. Eitel, Professor of Missions, Dean of the Roy Fish School of Evangelism and Missions, and Director of the World Missions Center Mark A. Howell, Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church Daytona Beach Evan Lenow, Assistant Professor of Ethics, Bobby L. and Janis Eklund Chair of Stewardship, and Associate Director of the Richard Land Center for Cultural Engagement Miles S. Mullin II, Assistant Professor of Church History, J. Dalton Havard School for Theological Studies Steven W. Smith, Vice President of Student Services and Communications and Professor of Communication Jerry Vines, Jerry Vines Ministries Joshua E. Williams, Assistant Professor of Old Testament BOOK REVIEW EDITOR AND EDITORIAL ASSISTANT David G. Norman, Jr. Southwestern Journal of Theology invites English-language submissions of original research in biblical studies, historical theology, systematic theology, ethics, philosophy of religion, homiletics, pastoral ministry, evangelism, missiology, and related fields. Articles submitted for consideration should be neither published nor under review for publication elsewhere. The recommended length of articles is between 4000 and 8000 words. For information on editorial and stylistic requirements, please contact the journal’s Editorial Assistant at journal@ swbts.edu. Articles should be sent to the Managing Editor, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, P.O. Box 22608, Fort Worth, Texas 76122. Books and software for review may be sent to Book Review Editor, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, P.O. Box 22608, Fort Worth, Texas 76122. Please direct subscription correspondence and change of address notices to Editorial Assistant, P.O. Box 22608, Fort Worth, Texas 76122. Change of address notices must include both the old and new addresses. A one-volume subscription in the United States is $30. An international subscription is $52. Southwestern Journal of Theology (ISSN 0038-4828) is published at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas 76122. For the contents of back issues and ordering information please see http://swbts.edu/journal. © 2014 CONTENTS Editorial . 141 Terry L. Wilder Balthasar Hubmaier’s Doctrine of Justification by Faith. .145 Michael Whitlock Curb Your Enthusiasm: Martin Luther’s Critique of Anabaptism. .163 Nathan A. Finn I Wait Upon My God: Exploring the Life and Letters of Michael Sattler. .183 Ched Spellman Brüderliche Vereinigung: A Brief Look at Unity in the Schleitheim Confession . .199 Michael D. Wilkinson Leonhard Schiemer’s Anabaptist Catechism (1527/28) . .215 Jason J. Graffagnino Translator’s Preface to Massimo Firpo’s “Religious Radicalism: From Anabaptism to Anti-Trinitarianism”. .257 Maël Disseau Book Reviews. .271 Abstracts of Recent Dissertations at Southwestern . .303 Index of Book Reviews Southwestern Journal of Theology • Volume 56 • Number 2• Spring 2014 Anabaptistica Terry L. Wilder, Editor Professor and Wesley Harrison Chair of New Testament Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary [email protected] This issue of the Southwestern Journal of Theology is devoted to the topic of “Anabaptistica,” a term that means “things about or pertaining to Ana- baptism and Anabaptists.” The Anabaptists were one major branch of the sixteenth-century Radical Reformers. “What is the essence of Anabaptism?” Questions like the latter one are sometimes difficult to answer because Anabaptism in the sixteenth century is quite complex. “However,” Anabaptist historian W. R. Estep wrote, “al- though it may not be possible to suggest a single concept by which ‘norma- tive Anabaptism’ can be identified, if the Anabaptist concept of the church with all of its ramifications is properly understood, it may provide a clue to 1 Anabaptism.” In other words, Estep strongly suggested that the Anabap- tists’ idea of church and the way they lived it out may be the singular most distinctive identification of this radical movement. I think he was correct. Rather than hold to the authority of the church, Anabaptists strongly held to the Bible’s authority, a conviction which clearly separated them from the Ro- man Catholics, but it was the putting into practice of their believer’s-church concept which noticeably distinguished them even from the Magisterial Re- 2 formers of the period, many of whom also held to biblical authority. On deeply-held convictions like the authority of Scripture, Anabaptists found the principles for the church and Christian living solely in the New Testa- ment; however, this belief was largely because they did not think that the Old Testament could ever be used to justify state churches or to persecute heretics, actions prominent in their day and viewed by them as absolutely un- 3 Christian. For Anabaptists, “the church was made up of committed disci- ples who bore witness to the new birth in believer’s baptism, which also con- stituted a pledge of discipleship”; discipleship encompassed the moral and 4 ethical aspects of Christian living. As a matter of fact, all of the Anabaptist ideas of “church, baptism, and discipleship” pointed to the biblical conviction that one’s supreme loyalty belonged to God and not to the government; and although they did recognize that governments were legitimately given by 1William R. Estep, Renaissance & Reformation (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 219. 2Ibid. 3Ibid. 4Ibid. 142 EDITORIAL God, they thought the state should stay out of religious matters. Indeed, they saw religious liberty as a biblical principle found in the gospel and viewed 5 with considerable disdain a religion that coerced a response to the gospel. “What kind of people were the Anabaptists—at least some of them?” The sketch on the cover for this spring journal issue gives us a considerable hint. This exceptional drawing carries with it a well-known, inspirational story of an Anabaptist named Dirk Willems. Joseph Liechty tells the story of Willems this way: Late in the winter of 1569, Dirk Willems of Holland was discovered as an Anabaptist, and a thief catcher came to arrest him at the village of Asperen. Running for his life, Dirk came to a body of water still coated with ice. After making his way across in great peril, he realised his pursuer had fallen through into the freezing water. Turning back, Dirk ran to the struggling man and dragged him safely to shore. The thief catcher wanted to release Dirk, but a burgomaster—having appeared on the scene—reminded the man he was under oath to deliver criminals to justice. Dirk was bound off to prison, interrogated, and tortured in an unsuccessful effort to make him renounce his faith. He was tried and found guilty of having been rebaptised, of holding secret meetings in his home, and of allowing baptism there—all of which he freely confessed. “Persisting obstinately in his opinion,” Dirk was sentenced to execution by fire. On the day of execution, a strong east wind blew the flames away from his upper body so that death was long delayed. The same wind carried his voice to the next town, where people heard him cry more than seventy times, “O my Lord; my God.” The judge present was “finally filled with sorrow and re- gret.” Wheeling his horse around so he saw no more, he ordered the executioner, “Dispatch the man with a quick death.”6 Whatever reason one ascribes to Willems for doing what he did in this account, one thing seems clear: this Anabaptist had the mind and heart of Christ characterized by, amongst other things, sacrificial love, love for one’s enemies, and the overwhelming desire not to see any lost soul perish and go into eternity without Jesus. 5Ibid. 6Joseph Liechty, “Why Did Dirk Willems Turn Back?” at http://www.anabaptistnetwork. com/node/175; accessed: 24 April 2014. This article was originally published in Anabaptism Today, Issue 6 (June 1994): 7-12. Liechty notes that the story of Dirk Willems comes from an Anabaptist martyrology published in 1660 compiled by Thieleman J. van Braght, translated as Martyrs’ Mirror (Scottdale: Herald Press, 1950), 741-42. A text-version download of this document is available at http://homecomers.org/mirror/downloads.htm; accessed: 24 April 2014. EDITORIAL 143 As mentioned earlier, this journal volume is devoted to “Anabaptistica” and features six insightful articles. The first article is presented by Michael Whitlock, assistant professor of Christian Studies at Truett-McConnell College. In his essay titled, “Balthasar Hubmaier’s Doctrine of Justification by Faith,” he explores the relationship between the leading Anabaptist theo- logian’s soteriology and the sixteenth-century Protestant understanding of sola fide. Nathan Finn, associate professor of Historical Theology and Bap- tist Studies at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, also contributes a paper called, “Curb Your Enthusiasm: Martin Luther’s Critique of Anabap- tism.” He argues that despite imprecision and few works devoted expressly to the Anabaptists, Luther offered an extensive and wide-ranging critical ap- praisal of this major movement in the Radical Reformation. Ched Spellman, assistant professor of Bible at Cedarville University, provides an article titled, “I Wait upon My God: Exploring the Life and Letters of Michael Sattler,” in which he explores the nature of Sattler’s legacy and asks why his life and letters became so significant in the years after his death. Michael Wilkinson, dean of the College at Southwestern, furnishes an article called, “Brüderliche Vereinigung: A Brief Look at Unity in The Schleitheim Confession.” In this thorough examination of unity in the confession, he clarifies that the confes- sion does not try to explain the doctrines of God, Christology, pneumatol- ogy, or Scripture, but rather focuses just on ecclesiology, of which unity is understandably an important part.