DOCSLIB.ORG

LIST of PUBLICATIONS Professor Carlos Gussenhoven (Emeritus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LIST of PUBLICATIONS Professor Carlos Gussenhoven (Emeritus) LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Professor Carlos Gussenhoven (emeritus) . Radboud University Nijmegen I. Peer reviewed publications forthcoming 1. Gussenhoven, Carlos (to appear). On the intonation of tonal varieties of English. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds) The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. 2. Gussenhoven, Carlos (to appear). Suprasegmentals. In James D. Wright (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sci- ences Second Edition. Oxford: Elsevier. 3. Gussenhoven, Carlos (to appear). Possible and impossible exceptions in Dutch word stress. In Harry van der Hulst (Ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4. Gussenhoven, Carlos (to appear) On the privileged status of intona- tional boundary tones: Evidence from Japanese, French, and Cantonese English. In Gene Buckley, Thera Crane & Jeff Good (Eds.) Revealing structure: Finding patterns in grammars and using grammatical pat- terns to elucidate language. A Festschrift to honor Larry M. Hyman. Stanford: CSLI. 5. Fournier, Rachel & Carlos Gussenhoven (ms). Context-specific erosion of the lexical tone contrast in the dialect of Roermond. Submitted 23 March 2010. 2014 6. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2014). Complex intonation near the tonal isogloss in the Netherlands. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.) Prosodic Typology II: The New Developments in the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Ox- ford University Press. 324-364. Sound files. 2013 7. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2013). From Cologne to Arzbach: An account of the Franconian ’tone reversal’. In Eva-Liina Asu & Partel Lippus (Eds.) Nordic Prosody. Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 11-24. 1 8. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Wencui Zhou (2013). Revisiting pitch slope and height effects on perceived duration. Proceedings of the 14th An- nual Conference of the International Speech Communication Associa- tion (Interspeech 2013) . 1365-1369. 9. Valenzuela, Pilar M. & Carlos Gussenhoven (2013). Shiwilu (Jebero). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43, 97-106. 10. Gussenhoven, Carlos, Yiya Chen, S´onia Frota, & Pilar Prieto (2013). Intonation. In M. Aronoff (Ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 24-Jul-2013. 2012 11. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2012). Quantity or durational enhancement of tone? The case of Maastricht Limburgian high vowels. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (Eds.) Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theo- retical and Diachronic Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 241-254. 12. Abolhasanizadeh, Vahideh, Mahmood Bijankhan & Carlos Gussen- hoven (2012). The Persian pitch accent and its retention after the focus. Lingua 122, 1380-1394. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.06.002. 13. He, Xuliang, Vincent J. van Heuven & Carlos Gussenhoven (2012). The selection of intonation contours by Chinese speakers of Dutch: Ortho- graphic closure vs. prosodic knowledge. Second Language Research 28, 283-318. 14. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Frank van den Beuken (2012). Contrasting the high rise and the low rise intonations in a dialect with the Central Franconian tone. The Linguistic Review 29, 75-107. Sound files. 15. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2012) Asymmetries in the intonation system of Maastricht Limburgish. Phonology 29, 39-79. Sound files. 16. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2012). Tone and intonation in Cantonese En- glish. The Third International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Lan- guages, Nanjing, May 26-29. http://www.tal2012.org/Full%20Papers.aspx 2011 2 17. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Haike Jacobs (2011). Understanding Phonol- ogy. Third Edition. Abingdon UK: Routledge.Errata in first print of 3rd edition. 18. van de Ven, Marco & Carlos Gussenhoven (2011) The timing of the final rise in falling-rising intonation contours in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 39, 225-236. 19. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2011). Sentential prominence in English. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. 5 vols. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 2780-2806. 20. He, Xuliang, Vincent J. van Heuven & Carlos Gussenhoven (2011). Choosing the optimal pitch accent location in Dutch by Chinese learn- ers and native listeners. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska- Kolaczyk (Eds.) Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. 125-136. 21. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2011). Over het waarom van de Sittardse difton- gering. In Lei Limpens (Ed.) Willy Dols 1911-1944. Een verwacht- ing die niet in vervulling mocht gaan. Sittard: Euregionaal Centrum Sittard-Geleen. pp 151-160. 22. Abolhasani Zadeh, Vahideh, Carlos Gussenhoven & Mahmood Bijankhan (2011). A pitch accent contrast in Persian. ICPhS XVII, 188-191. 23. Hagen, Marinda, Joop Kerkhoff & Carlos Gussenhoven (2011). Singing your accent away, and why it works. ICPhS XVII, 799-802. 24. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2011). Quantity vs durational enhancement of tone in the Maastricht vowel system. ICPhS XVII, 795-798. 25. He, Xuliang, Hanssen, Judith, Vincent J. van Heuven, & Carlos Gussen- hoven (2011). Phonetic implementation must be learnt: Native vs Chi- nese realization of focus accent in Dutch. ICPhS XVII, 843-846. 2010 26. Fournier, Rachel, Carlos Gussenhoven, Ole Jensen & Peter Hagoort (2010). Lateralization of tonal and intonational pitch processing: An MEG study. Brain Research 1328, 79-88. 3 27. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Inyang Udofot (2010). Word melodies vs. pitch accents: A perceptual evaluation of terracing contours in British and Nigerian English. Speech Prosody 2010. 28. Kung, Carmen, Dorothee J. Chwilla, Carlos Gussenhoven, Sarah B¨ogels & Herbert Schriefers (2010). What did you say just now, bitterness or wife? An ERP study on the interaction between tone, intonation and context in Cantonese Chinese. Speech Prosody 2010. 29. Abolhasani Zadeh, Vahideh, Carlos Gussenhoven & Mahmood Bijankhan (2010). The position of clitics in Persian intonational structure. Speech Prosody 2010. 2009 30. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2009). Vowel duration, syllable quantity, and stress in Dutch. In Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (Eds.). The Nature of the Word. Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA/London, UK: MIT Press. 181-198. [Also ROA 381 (2000).] 2008 31. Chen, Yiya & Carlos Gussenhoven (2008). Emphasis and tonal imple- mentation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36, 724-746. 32. Gussenhoven, Carlos & J¨org Peters (2008). De tonen van het Limburgs. Nederlandse Taalkunde 13, 87-114. Errata in journal version. 33. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Renske Teeuw (2008). A moraic and a syllabic H-tone in Yucatec Maya. In: Esther Herrera Z. & Pedro Mart´ınBu- trage˜no(Eds.). Fonolog´ıainstrumental: Patrones f´onicos y variaci´on. Mexico City: El Colegio de M´exico.49-71. 34. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2008). Notions and subnotions in information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, 381-395. 35. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2008). Semantic judgments as evidence for the intonational structure of Dutch. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008. Campinas, Brazil. 297-300. 36. Hanssen, Judith, J¨org Peters & Carlos Gussenhoven (2008). Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008. Campinas, Brazil. 609-612. 4 2007 37. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2007). Wat is de beste transcriptie voor het Nederlands? Nederlandse Taalkunde 12, 331-350. 38. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2007). Intonation. In Paul de Lacy (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press. 253- 280. 39. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2007). A vowel height split explained: Com- pensatory Listening and Speaker Control. In Jennifer Cole & Jos´eI. Hualde (Eds.) Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 145-172. 40. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2007). Types of Focus in English. In Chungmin Lee, Matthew Gordon, and Daniel B¨uring(Eds.) Topic and Focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer. 83-100. 41. Riad, Tomas & Carlos Gussenhoven (Eds.) (2007). Tones and Tunes. Volume 1: Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 42. Gussenhoven, Carlos & Tomas Riad (Eds.) (2007). Tones and Tunes. Volume 2: Experimental Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 43. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2007). Review of Prosodies, ed. S. Frota & M. Vig´ario (2005). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 6, 83-91. 44. Hanssen, Judith, J¨org Peters & Carlos Gussenhoven (2007). Phrase- final pitch accommodation effects in Dutch. In: J¨urgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 1077-1080. 45. Post, Brechtje, Mariapaola D’Imperio & Carlos Gussenhoven (2007). Fine phonetic detail and intonational meaning. In: J¨urgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 191-196. 46. Peters, J¨org, Judith Hanssen & Carlos Gussenhoven (2007). Alignment of the second low target in Dutch falling-rising pitch contours. In: Hugo 5 van Hamme & Rob van Son (Eds.) Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, pp. 2641-2644. 2006 47. Fournier, Rachel, Jo Verhoeven, Marc Swerts & Carlos Gussenhoven (2006). Perceiving word prosodic contrasts as a function of sentence prosody in two Dutch Limburgian dialects. Journal of Phonetics 34, 29-48. 48. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2006). Enhancing the durational enhancement of a tone contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (No. 5). 3269. 49. Gussenhoven, Carlos (2006). Experimental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intonation in Hong Kong English and Guangzhou Cantonese-Accented English: a Phonetic Comparison
    ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 724-738, September 2020 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1105.07 Intonation in Hong Kong English and Guangzhou Cantonese-accented English: A Phonetic Comparison Yunyun Ran School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 333 Long Teng Road, Shanghai 201620, China Jeroen van de Weijer School of Foreign Languages, Shenzhen University, 3688 Nan Hai Avenue, Shenzhen 518060, China Marjoleine Sloos Fryske Akademy (KNAW), Doelestrjitte 8, 8911 DX Leeuwarden, The Netherlands Abstract—Hong Kong English is to a certain extent a standardized English variety spoken in a bilingual (English-Cantonese) context. In this article we compare this (native) variety with English as a foreign language spoken by other Cantonese speakers, viz. learners of English in Guangzhou (mainland China). We examine whether the notion of standardization is relevant for intonation in this case and thus whether Hong Kong English is different from Cantonese English in a wider perspective, or whether it is justified to treat Hong Kong English and Cantonese English as the same variety (as far as intonation is concerned). We present a comparison between intonational contours of different sentence types in the two varieties, and show that they are very similar. This shows that, in this respect, a learned foreign-language variety can resemble a native variety to a great extent. Index Terms—Hong Kong English, Cantonese-accented English, intonation I. INTRODUCTION Cantonese English may either refer to Hong Kong English (HKE), or to a broader variety of English spoken in the Cantonese-speaking area, including Guangzhou (Wong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem Consonant Cooccurrence Restrictions in Ngbaka
    Stem Consonant Cooccurrence Restrictions in Ngbaka Jeroen van de Weijer 1. Introduction Ngbaka is one of the languages spoken in the Central African Republic.1 It is part of the Adamawa Ubanguian branch of the Niger-Congo language family. The root cooccurrence restrictions in this language have attracted considerable attention since they were first reported by Thomas (1963) (see Wescott 1965; Chomsky and Halle 1968: 387; Clements 1982; Itô 1984; Churma 1984; Herbert 1986: 113-16; Mester 1986: 32-45; Sagey 1986: 260-66; Mester 1988; Lombardi 1990: 376 (fn. 2), among others). In Ngbaka there are vowel cooccurrence restrictions (not discussed here) and restrictions on the occurrence of consonants with the same point of articulation. The latter are stated below (from Wescott 1965, who summarises Thomas 1963: 63ff.): (1) (...) if a disyllabic word contains a voiceless consonant, it does not also contain the voiced counterpart of that consonant (that is, /p/ excludes /b/, /s/ excludes /z/, etc.). Similarly, if a disyllabic word contains a voiced obstruent, it does not also contain the prenasalized counterpart of that obstruent (that is, /b/ excludes /mb/, /z/ excludes /nz/, etc.); if such a word contains a prenasalized obstruent, it does not also contain the corresponding nasal (that is, /mb/ excludes /m/, /nz/ excludes /n/, etc.). (Wescott 1965: 346) The consonant inventory of Ngbaka is given below (see Thomas 1963: 55): Thanks to Colin Ewen, Harry van der Hulst, Grazyna Rowicka and an anonymous reviewer for useful discussion. All errors are my own. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, 259–266. DOI 10.1075/avt.11.25wei ISSN 0929–7332 / E-ISSN 1569–9919 © Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap 260 JEROEN VAN DE WEIJER (2) vcl obs p f t s k kp vcd obs b v d z g gb glottalised 'b prenasal mb nd nz ng ngb nasal m n p glide j w liquid 1 glottal stop ? glottal fricative h Ngbaka has seven oral and three nasal vowels (/ieeaoouâê ô/) and three tones (high, low, and mid - the latter of which is not marked in this paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Dresher 2009 Chapter10 References
    References Abaglo, Poovi, and Diana Archangeli (1989). Language-particular underspecification: Gengbe /e/ and Yoruba /i/. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 457–80. Anderson, John M. (2005). Old English i-umlaut (for the umpteenth time). English Language and Linguistics 9: 195–227. Anderson, John M., and Colin J. Ewen (1987). Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Anderson, Stephen R. (1985). Phonology in the twentieth century: theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Aoki, Haruo (1966). Nez Perce vowel harmony and Proto-Sahaptian vowels. Language 42: 759–67. (1970). Nez Perce grammar (University of California Publications in Linguistics 62). Berkeley: University of California Press. Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphol- ogy. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Revised version published 1988 by Garland Press, New York. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5: 183–207. Archangeli, Diana, and Douglas Pulleyblank (1989). Yoruba vowel harmony. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 173–217. (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (2007). Harmony. In de Lacy (2007), 353–78. Aslin, Richard N., David B. Pisoni, Beth L. Hennessy and Alan J. Perey (1981). Dis- crimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Development 52: 1135–45. Avery, Peter (1996). The representation of voicing contrasts. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto. Avery, Peter, B. Elan Dresher and Keren Rice (eds.) (2008). Contrast in phonology: theory, perception, acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Avery, Peter, and William J. Idsardi (2001). Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T. A. Hall (2001), 41–70. Avery, Peter, and Keren Rice (1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Some /L/S Are Darker Than Others: Accounting for Variation in English /L/ with Ultrasound Tongue Imaging
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 20 Issue 2 Selected Papers from NWAV 42 Article 21 10-2014 Some /l/s are darker than others: Accounting for variation in English /l/ with ultrasound tongue imaging Danielle Turton Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Turton, Danielle (2014) "Some /l/s are darker than others: Accounting for variation in English /l/ with ultrasound tongue imaging," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 20 : Iss. 2 , Article 21. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol20/iss2/21 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol20/iss2/21 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Some /l/s are darker than others: Accounting for variation in English /l/ with ultrasound tongue imaging Abstract The phenomenon of /l/-darkening has been a subject of linguistic interest due to the remarkable amount of contextual variation it displays. Although it is generally stated that the light variant occurs in onsets (e.g. leap) and the dark variant in codas (e.g. peel), many studies report variation in different morphosyntactic environments. Beyond this variation in morphosyntactic conditioning, different dialects of English have been reported as showing highly variable distributions. These descriptions include a claimed lack of dis- tinction in the North of England, a three-way distinction between light, dark and vocalised /l/ in the South-East, and a gradient continuum of darkness in American English. This paper presents ultrasound tongue imaging data collected to test dialectal and contextual descriptions of /l/ in English, providing hitherto absent instrumental evidence for different distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • 78. 78. Nasal Harmony Nasal Harmony
    Bibliographic Details The Blackwell Companion to Phonology Edited by: Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice eISBN: 9781405184236 Print publication date: 2011 78. Nasal Harmony RACHEL WWALKER Subject Theoretical Linguistics » Phonology DOI: 10.1111/b.9781405184236.2011.00080.x Sections 1 Nasal vowel–consonant harmony with opaque segments 2 Nasal vowel–consonant harmony with transparent segments 3 Nasal consonant harmony 4 Directionality 5 Conclusion ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Notes REFERENCES Nasal harmony refers to phonological patterns where nasalization is transmitted in long-distance fashion. The long-distance nature of nasal harmony can be met by the transmission of nasalization either to a series of segments or to a non-adjacent segment. Nasal harmony usually occurs within words or a smaller domain, either morphologically or prosodically defined. This chapter introduces the chief characteristics of nasal harmony patterns with exemplification, and highlights related theoretical themes. It focuses primarily on the different roles that segments can play in nasal harmony, and the typological properties to which they give rise. The following terminological conventions will be assumed. A trigger is a segment that initiates nasal harmony. A target is a segment that undergoes harmony. An opaque segment or blocker halts nasal harmony. A transparent segment is one that does not display nasalization within a span of nasal harmony, but does not halt harmony from transmitting beyond it. Three broad categories of nasal harmony are considered in this chapter. They are (i) nasal vowel–consonant harmony with opaque segments, (ii) nasal vowel– consonant harmony with transparent segments, and (iii) nasal consonant harmony. Each of these groups of systems show characteristic hallmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Phonology: Phonotactics on the Edge1
    Marginal phonology: Phonotactics on the edge1 ELLEN BROSELOW Abstract As has long been recognized, the isomorphism between word edges and word- internal syllable edges is far from perfect. This paper examines the fit between an Optimality-Theoretic account of edge/interior asymmetries, using position- specific faithfulness constraints to protect edges or interiors of morphological constituents, and the actual typology of attested edge/interior asymmetries. A detailed analysis of the Indonesian language Balantak, in which the first mem- ber of a CC cluster is severely restricted unless that first C is root-final, is com- patible with the positional faithfulness account, but is problematic for accounts that explain greater freedom at edges solely in terms of licensing by higher prosodic structure or by phonetic context. I argue that a theory of edge/interior asymmetries must incorporate two possible functions of phonotactic restric- tions: to facilitate recovery of segmental contrasts, and to facilitate the parsing of strings into morphemes. 1. Introduction: Edge-interior asymmetries One argument for including the syllable in phonological representations ap- peals to parallels between medial phonotactics and the phonotactics of word 1. This work was supported by in part by NSF grant SBR-9729108 to the author and Daniel Finer and by funding from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelik Onderzoek NWO. Portions of this paper were presented at the 8th Manchester Phonology Meeting, UK, May 2000, the 8th Biennial Workshop on Phonology, University of Utrecht, June 2000; 6th Annual SWOT (South Western Optimality Theory) Conference, USL Los Angeles, April 2001; and at SUNY Stony Brook, March 2001. I am grateful to those audiences, particularly Yoonjung Kang and Ricardo Bermudez-Otero, and to an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metathesis: Formal and Functional Considerations Elizabeth Hume Ohio State University
    To appear in: Hume, Elizabeth, Norval Smith & Jeroen van de Weijer. 2001. Surface Syllable Structure and Segment Sequencing. HIL Occasional Papers. Leiden, NL: HIL. Metathesis: Formal and Functional Considerations Elizabeth Hume Ohio State University 1. Introduction The focus of this paper is on metathesis, the process whereby in certain languages, under certain conditions, sounds appear to switch positions with one another. Thus, in a string of sounds where we would expect the linear ordering of two sounds to be ...xy..., we find instead ...yx.... In the Austronesian language Leti, for example, the final segments of a word occur in the order vowel + consonant in some contexts, while as consonant + vowel in others, e.g. [kunis]/[kunsi] ‘key’. While variation in the linear ordering of elements is typical in the domain of syntax, it is comparatively striking in phonology, differing in nature from most other phonological processes which are typically defined in terms of a single sound, or target, which undergoes a change in a specified context. Thus, the change from /nb/ to [mb] can be described in simple terms as place assimilation of the target /n/ in the context of a following /b/, thereby yielding [mb]; or, in traditional linear formalism, /n/ ® [m]/ __[b]. In contrast, the reversal of sounds such as /sk/ ® [ks], as attested in Faroese, defies such a simple formalism given that metathesis seems to involve two targets, with each essentially providing the context for the other. Due in part to the distinct nature of the process, metathesis has traditionally resisted a unified and explanatory account in phonological theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanation in Typology
    Explanation in typology Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence Edited by Karsten Schmidtke-Bode Natalia Levshina Susanne Maria Michaelis Ilja A. Seržant language Conceptual Foundations of science press Language Science 3 Conceptual Foundations of Language Science Series editors Mark Dingemanse, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics N. J. Enfield, University of Sydney Editorial board Balthasar Bickel, University of Zürich, Claire Bowern, Yale University, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, University of Helsinki, William Croft, University of New Mexico, Rose-Marie Déchaine, University of British Columbia, William A. Foley, University of Sydney , William F. Hanks, University of California at Berkeley, Paul Kockelman, Yale University, Keren Rice, University of Toronto, Sharon Rose, University of California at San Diego, Frederick J. Newmeyer, University of Washington, Wendy Sandler, University of Haifa, Dan Sperber Central European University No scientific work proceeds without conceptual foundations. In language science, our concepts about language determine our assumptions, direct our attention, and guide our hypotheses and our reason- ing. Only with clarity about conceptual foundations can we pose coherent research questions, design critical experiments, and collect crucial data. This series publishes short and accessible books that explore well-defined topics in the conceptual foundations of language science. The series provides a venue for conceptual arguments and explorations that do not require the traditional book-length treatment, yet that demand more space than a typical journal article allows. In this series: 1. Enfield, N. J. Natural causes of language. 2. Müller, Stefan. A lexicalist account of argument structure: Template-based phrasal LFG approaches and a lexical HPSG alternative 3. Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Radical CV Phonology Is the Culmination of Many Years of Work and Principles of Reflection on the Nature of Phonological Representations
    Edinburgh Studies in Theoretical Linguistics CV Phonology Radical Principles of Books in the series address the core sub-disciplines of linguistics − phonology, Edinburgh Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 4 morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics − and their interfaces, with a particular focus on novel data from various sources and their challenges to linguistic theorising. ‘Principles of Radical CV Phonology is the culmination of many years of work and Principles of reflection on the nature of phonological representations. The theory, presented in a clear and thorough manner, builds on and synthesises ideas from a number of different theoretical and descriptive approaches. Its comprehensive treatment of Radical CV every major issue relating to the basic units of phonology makes this book a valuable resource for anyone with an interest in the cognitive organisation of speech sounds and its relation to phonetics.’ Elan Dresher, University of Toronto Phonology A new theory of the structure of phonological representations for segments and syllables A Theory of Based on 30 years of research, this book presents a theory about the ‘speech sounds’ that occur contrastively in human spoken and signed languages. Identifying the ultimate Segmental and Syllabic elements of which speech sounds consist, Harry van der Hulst proposes a radical theory that recognises only two elements: |C| and |V|. Based on a small set of first principles, Structure the book explains what a possible speech sound is and provides explicit structures for all speech sounds that occur contrastively in the world’s languages. With numerous examples from hundreds of languages, including Dutch, Czech, Japanese, Kabardian, Hungarian, Korean and Zulu, the book also provides insight into current theories of segmental structure, commonly used feature systems and recurrent controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquiring Markedness Constraints the Case of French*
    Acquiring markedness constraints The case of French* Jeroen van de Weijer and Marjoleine Sloos Shanghai International Studies University / University of Groningen This paper questions the assumption made in classic Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993 [2004]) that markedness constraints are an innate part of Universal Grammar. Instead, we argue that constraints are acquired on the basis of the language data to which L1 learning children are exposed. This is argued both on general grounds (innateness is an assumption that should not be invoked lightly) and on the basis of empirical evidence. We investigate this issue for six general markedness constraints in French, and show that all constraints could be acquired on the basis of the ambient data. Second, we show that the order of acquisition of the marked structures matches the frequency of viola- tions of the relevant constraints in the input quite well. This argues in favour of a phonological model in which constraints are acquired, not innate, i.e. a model in which grammatical notions such as constraints are derived from language use. Keywords: constraints, Optimality Theory, innateness, Universal Grammar, L1 acquisition, frequency, grammar, usage 1. Introduction In classic Optimality Theory, i.e. the basic version of the theory proposed in Prince & Smolensky (1993 [2004]), markedness constraints are part of Universal Grammar and therefore innate. Acquisition consists of the correct ranking of these innate markedness constraints or the step-wise demotion of these (initially high-ranked) constraints (Tesar & Smolensky 2000). The innateness of constraints is usually taken for granted (as part of the Chomskyan UG paradigm) and only in rare cases is it argued that constraints must be innate on the basis of empiri- cal evidence (Gnanadesikan 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • On De-Affrication in Modern Georgian
    <LINK "but2-n*">"but2-r15">"but2-r12">"but2-r7">"but2-r20"> <TARGET "but2" DOCINFO AUTHOR "Marika Butskhrikidze and Jeroen van de Weijer" TITLE "On de-affrication in Modern Georgian" SUBJECT "AVT, Volume 18 (2001)" KEYWORDS "" SIZE HEIGHT "220" WIDTH "150" VOFFSET "4"> On de-affrication in Modern Georgian* Marika Butskhrikidze and Jeroen van de Weijer Leiden University/ULCL-HIL 1. Introduction In this paper we describe and analyse the facts of de-affrication in Western Geor- gian dialects. Traditionally, a number of issues are relevant in the discussion of the phonological structure of complex segments such as affricates: among these are, first, the question of whether the affricates truly function as a single segment from the viewpoint of the synchronic phonology. We will see that there is no doubt that affricates function as single segments in the dialects under discussion. The second question concerns the relationship between features denoting manner and those denoting place: if affricates consist of two parts, with different manner characteris- tics (an occlusion followed by a frication phase), how are these manner characteris- tics linked up to place features: do the manner features have separate place specifi- cations, is only one of them specified for place, and, if so, how is this relation characterised? Finally, the nature of the place and manner features is at stake: is a binary feature [±continuant] suitable for the purpose (Sagey 1986), or, as has been suggested by various researchers, a sequence of two monovalued features [stop] and [cont]? The implication of the latter proposal is that the two parts of the affricate are not autosegmentally ordered vis-à-vis one another.
    [Show full text]
  • EGG Handout Scheer Lagodekhi.Pdf
    Tobias Scheer The EGG [email protected] Lagodekhi 2016 week 2 class this handout and some of the references quoted at http://sites.unice.fr/scheer WHY MODULARITY PREDICTS THAT THE RELATIONSHIP BE- TWEEN PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY IS ARBITRARY DAY 1 Brainstorming (1) answer (short version) a. computational systems are domain-specific: they process units that belong to a specif- ic vocabulary and hence cannot understand the vocabulary of the neighbour. b. hence they can only communicate through translation: spell-out. c. translation is done through a lexical access, e.g. at the upper interface {synt|phon}. d. consequence of lexical access: the relationship between the two items {X|Y} is arbi- trary. e. the modular architecture governs all of the mind (and hence of grammar). Therefore the lower interface (phonology-phonetics) must also follow its workings. f. spell-out, post-phonological the output of phonology and its exponents in phonetics {phono|phonet}are related by a lexical access – hence their relationship is arbitrary. Some issues (2) grammar a. what is in, what is out? Minimalist definition (third factor): all and only those things that are specific to lan- guage. b. where exactly does the red line run? c. what exactly is non-grammar? Still a computational system in the modular sense? d. is phonetics a computational system? If so, what is its proprietary vocabulary? (3) how do non-grammar and grammar communicate? a. non-grammar cannot be modular, can it? b. categorization in psychology: transforms a gradient (real-world) reality into a discrete mental object Harnad (1987, 2003) c.
    [Show full text]