DOCSLIB.ORG

Bays West Draft Place Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bays West Draft Place Strategy Draft Bays West Place Strategy NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment March 2021 Welcome to Country The stretch of Country now known as Bays West Welcome to Country provided by Shannon Foster, has been known for millennia as Gari Gurad/ D'harawal Sydney Traditional Owner and Knowledge Nura (Saltwater Country) and Nattai Gurad/ Keeper. Artwork titled 'Guriwal Dreaming' by Shannon Nura (Freshwater Country). This Country is Foster. celebrated for vast expanses of garaban (rock Within the Bays West Place Strategy, you will and sandstone) which in some places provides encounter stories of the Bays West location gibbaragunya (stone/cave shelters), and in other specifically. These are a small selection of the places creates yiningmah (steep cliffs) where D'harawal stories of this place. They are shared by a ceremony can be performed privately without contributor to this document, D'harawal Knowledge uninitiated onlookers. Keeper Shannon Foster, whose Ancestors kept these knowledges alive, and whose Elders and Knowledge For thousands of generations, local Aboriginal Keepers still celebrate, live by and share them today. people have lived an abundant and sustainable lifestyle within a complex kinship system of The cultural Intellectual Property (IP) of all Aboriginal numerous families and clans on this Country peoples, including the cultural IP of these stories, including the D’harawal, Dharug, Eora, Gai- remains with the people they belong to and can never maragal, Gundangara and Guringai peoples, be vested or assigned. In this case the stories belong among others. We pay our respects to their to the D'harawal people of the Sydney region who Ancestors and Elders past, present and know themselves as Iyora here, and these stories emerging and acknowledge that through may not be duplicated or used without the express honouring Country, we also honour their timeless permission of Sydney D'harawal Elders or Knowledge connections to Country. Keepers. The stories shared are just the starting point. There are other stories, and there are many It is also here on this Country that we recognise layers of these stories that have not been unpacked the changing and evolving nature of Country in this document. There may also be other Ancestral and the ways in which local communities and stories of this location from other local peoples, and ecologies have responded and adapted to these hearing them will involve the effort and time to learn in changes throughout time. We acknowledge culturally appropriate ways. that Country is a living, breathing entity with an enduring Duwee or Spirit and it is this spirit that informs the work we undertake here today, and into the future. Ngeeyinee bulima nandiritah (May you always see the beauty of this earth) Executive summary Bays West has changed over time vibrant and activated precinct – a from its Aboriginal origins, through new kind of Sydney urbanism that the industrial age, to its present- respects and celebrates Country, day use as a significant harbour- drawing on natural, cultural, side precinct supporting ports maritime and industrial stories to and a working harbour, framed by shape an innovative and sustainable decommissioned heritage structures new place for living, recreation and and important arterial road working. infrastructure. The Bays West of the future will Throughout its history, Bays West evolve over time into a mixed-use the innovation corridor to adapt to The NSW Government’s decision to has seen wholesale shifts in patterns precinct integrated with enhanced new technologies and sustainable invest in the delivery of a Sydney of land use. More recently, waves of port and working harbour activities, port operations, and building a Metro station will be the first step to industry have moved in, expanded, a ‘blue economy’ leveraging world-class foreshore walk with unlock the precinct’s potential and then become redundant or moved an already powerful economic walking and cycling connections to to ensure access for all. It provides to other parts of Sydney, with the contribution – some $4 billion over the surrounding urban areas. a catalyst, offering significant development and connectivity vital exception of ports and working 25 years from Port Authority land. It will be host to activities, places, opportunities for its future resident, harbour operations. As Bays West It will be supported by the adaptive connections and destinations that worker and visitor populations has evolved, people have been re-use of the White Bay Power enrich the precinct’s character and and will allow the future vision and progressively excluded, so that Station and more convenient and meaning through built form and opportunities for the precinct to be much of the space has become direct active transport connections. public spaces that embrace its realised. inaccessible to the public and the Opportunities are boundless. These natural and cultural heritage. The area’s life and vitality has been lost. include revitalising heritage assets, precinct will respect and celebrate creating an international gateway at This Place Strategy for Bays West Country, building on its past to Above: The sandstone seating at Ewenton the Cruise Terminal, capitalising on sets out a vision for a connected, shape a new place. Park in Balmain, looking across to Barangaroo and the Sydney CBD. Draft Bays West Place Strategy 3 Executive summary This Place Strategy speaks to Bay’s West’s past, present and future. Its 14 directions, across Land use and function, Design of places and Transport and Heritage and culture Infrastructure delivery five enabling themes, that address further spaces that provide movement that that recognise and governance that address connectivity, land uses of Bays West guidance on how recognise the the importance of recognise that the productivity, liveability and the role it will play Bays West will feel to constrained nature of the past and how precinct will evolve and sustainability in Sydney’s future. people and what is Bays West and establish understanding history over time and that important in the design how the precinct will and culture is critical to multiple stakeholders matters that will guide • Direction 1 the growth and change Deliver diverse of buildings and public move people and goods creating a place with are required to ensure of the precinct over employment spaces domain. to, from and through meaning. that Bays West is that can support • Direction 4 Bays West. • Direction 11 successfully delivered. time. The themes and knowledge intensive A key focus of the Bring new life to existing directions are: industries, which are a • Direction 8 • Direction 13 precinct is the design of diverse assets and uses, key contributor to the Improve the precinct’s Use a whole-of- open space and social integrating rich layers success of the innovation connectivity and government approach infrastructure, ensuring of creativity, heritage corridor integration into its to deliver strong and careful integration with locality and surrounding and culture across the coordinated place • Direction 2 the natural, industrial, areas precinct outcomes for Bays West Deliver a range of maritime and cultural • Direction 12 over time housing, including • Direction 9 heritage Ensure that future affordable housing, to Provide for new • Direction 14 • Direction 5 developments recognise, support the jobs created connections to existing Provide services and Promote design embrace and create in the precinct and the places by removing infrastructure to support excellence and embed a opportunities for deeper ongoing growth of the existing barriers to allow the needs of the existing people-focused approach understanding of our Eastern Harbour City connections through and future community to deliver high quality the site and convenient culture and stories of Bays West and its • Direction 3 and diverse built form access to the new Metro surrounds as it grows Retain, manage and allow and amenity outcomes station over time. the essential strategic • Direction 6 port and maritime • Direction 10 Promote biodiversity and industry uses to grow Prioritise walking, cycling improve water quality and evolve, to ensure and public transport in the harbour whilst they continue to support by capitalising on the restoring and expanding the NSW economy new Metro station, the green and blue creating more convenient natural systems and direct active • Direction 7 transport connections Deliver a world class and investigate the sustainable precinct reinstatement of a which is carbon neutral crossing from Bays West and delivers efficient to Pyrmont management of energy and water, and the elimination of waste Draft Bays West Place Strategy 4 Executive summary The themes and directions are The vision, directions and big backed by six big moves: moves are articulated in the structure plan, which is presented Big Move 1 as an aspirational, end-state Repurpose White Bay Power Station representation of the precinct’s to become a focal point of the urban renewal. This Bays West Place precinct. Strategy also contains an initial stage structure plan, which shows Big Move 2 the precinct when the metro station A crossing from Bays West to opens, towards the end of the Pyrmont to create more convenient decade. and direct active transport The vision, directions, big moves connections. and the structure plan are all supported by a range of actions Big Move 3 to achieve them over the short, Connect community to water, medium and long term. The while recognising
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission on the Bays Precinct Report on Consultation
    SUBMISSION ON THE BAYS PRECINCT REPORT ON CONSULTATION FEBRUARY 2011 SUBMISSION ON THE BAYS PRECINCT Infrastructure Partnerships Australia is REPORT ON CONSULTATION 2011 a national forum, comprising public and private sector CEO M embers, advocating the public policy interests of Australia’s infrastructure industry . FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: BRENDAN LYON ERIC MILLER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TRANSPORT POLICY OFFICER INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIPS AUSTRALIA INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIPS AUSTRALIA Level 8, 8-10 Loftus Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Level 8, 8-10 Loftus Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box R1804, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 PO Box R1804, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 P | 02 9240 2051 P | 02 9240 2062 E | [email protected] E | [email protected] SUBMISSION ON THE BAYS PRECINCT REPORT ON CONSULTATION 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Infrastructure Partnerships Australia (IPA) is pleased to provide this submission to Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority in response to ‘Report on Outcomes: Stage 1 Consultation Process February 2011’. IPA supports the planning principles that have resulted from the first phase of consultation on the Bays Precinct and looks forward to seeing them implemented during Stage 2 and into the future. IPA particularly supports the position on the Rozelle Rail Yards – the yards should remain reserved for future transport infrastructure is vital to Sydney’s future public transport provision. Much of the Bays Precinct will be utilised for mixed land-use such as residential, commercial and open space. However, the decision to set aside potential transport and infrastructure corridors and bases, including the rail yards at Rozelle and possible ferry infrastructure at White Bay and Glebe Island, demonstrates a coordinated strategic approach to land-use planning - an approach that has been lacking in NSW’s recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • Leichhardt Historical Journal 24
    LEICHHARDT Leichhardt Historical Journal No. 24 Leichhardt Historical HISTORICAL JOURNAL 24 Rowland Walpole Loane Esq. at Balmain The genesis of Birch Grove House and Waterview House By Eric Young The Waterview Estate, Balmain – Part 3 From Cooper Street to Waterview Street 1835-1970 By Peter Reynolds Balmain Leichhardt Lilyfield Rozelle Leichhardt Hist Journ cover 24.indd 1 7/07/14 12:18 PM Journal No 24 From the Editor 2014 Historians’ Past Endeavours In pinning down the main players in the creation and development of Birch Grove House and Waterview House, two of Contents the earliest known houses on the Balmain peninsula, many errors and suppositions arose. Rowland Walpole Loane Esq. at Balmain Rowland Walpole Loane, now revealed as responsible for the by Eric Young 1 building of both houses, was hardly mentioned in early historical studies of the area. Researchers tended to look no further than the The Waterview Estate Balmain Pt 3 name ‘John Birch’ as the builder of Birch Grove House. From Cooper St to Waterview St 1835-1970 Sections 7-10 William Balmain was known but the shadowy figure of John by Peter Reynolds 22 Borthwick Gilchrist was just a name and hardly known outside Britain and Calcutta. Abbreviations & Conversions 107 Later writers about the area, S. Elliott Napier, S N Hogg and Dr Caruthers blurred matters further. Robert Irving and Peter Cover Reynolds provided some facts but still nominated John Birch Birch Grove House as the builder. In LHJ 22 Reynolds incorrectly surmised that Watercolour by Kathleen Cocker Parbury was responsible for the building of Waterview House.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE REFERENCE Number Street Name Suburb Site
    TITLE REFERENCE Number Street Name Suburb Site Property Name Premises OWNERSHIP CROWN CLASSIFICATION ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS AGREEMENTS OCCUPANT CURRENT LEASE EXPIRY Option(s) Expiry Date incl. Ward Approx. Approx. Construction Date LAND See Definitions DATE X + X OR Options Land Area (sqm) Floor Area (sqm) # X Y Premises NLA 654/DP729261 Annandale Annandale Gray Street Park Inner West Council NO Road Reserve RE1 Public Recreation Road reserve. Located Owner Occupier Inner West Council Balmain Street/Gray Street between 302 and 304 10/DP951610 Arguimbau Street Annandale Whites Creek Valley Park Inner West Council NO Community RE1 Public Recreation Transfer AG499357 registered Owner Occupier Minister administering the EP&A Act Balmain 9A/55/DP1935 (Part) 22/9/2011. See Land 1/DP173943 Booth Street Annandale Bridge Support Inner West Council NO Operational RE1 Public Recreation Encumbrances: (1) Owner Occupier Inner West Council Leichhardt Land Reservations and conditions 1/DP797907 5-7 Cahill Street Annandale Cahill Street Reserve Cahill Playground Inner West Council NO Community RE1 Public Recreation Encumbrances: (1) Owner Occupier Inner West Council Leichhardt 2/DP797907 Reservations and conditions 1/DP996258 2 Cahill Street Annandale Part Cahill Street Reserve Inner West Council NO Community RE1 Public Recreation Encumbrances: (1) Owner Occupier Inner West Council Leichhardt Reservations and conditions 101/DP739875 Chester Street and Annandale Douglas Grant Memorial Inner West Council NO Community RE1 Public Recreation Purchase completed
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Harbour Superyacht Guidelines
    Sydney Harbour superyacht guidelines Guidelines for Masters operating Superyachts on Sydney Harbour Contents Executive Summary 1 Qualifications and registration 9 Port procedures 2 Boat licences and certificates of competency 9 Directions for navigation 2 Registration of vessels 9 Directions and regulations to be observed 2 Protected animals 10 Required charts 2 Approach distances 10 Port services 2 Speed 10 Pilotage requirements 2 Approach directions 10 Wind and weather 3 Action if a marine mammal approaches 11 Port Authority of NSW Vessel Traffic Service 3 Communications 11 Pilot boarding place 3 VHF channels 11 Sydney Harbour – general considerations 3 Important contact details 11 General 3 Useful websites 12 Speed limits 3 Photographs 13 Speed restricted areas 4 Anzac Bridge 13 Conduct within Sydney Harbour 7 Rozelle Bay Superyacht Marina 13 Prohibited areas for general navigation 7 Campbells Cove 14 General 7 Sydney Cove – Circular Quay 15 Restricted access areas 7 Fort Denison 15 Collision or incident reports 8 Garden Island Naval Base 15 Berthing at commercial wharves 8 Walsh Bay 16 Pollution, nuisance or danger 8 Sydney Harbour Bridge 17 Marine Pollution Act 1987 8 Jones Bay Wharf, Pyrmont 17 Pump-out facilities 8 Kirribilli Point 17 Garbage 9 Anzac Bridge 18 Causing of nuisance or danger 9 Glebe Island Bridge 18 Farm Cove 18 Wind frequency analyses 19 FRONT COVER PHOTO: ANDREA FRANCOLINI Executive Summary Welcome to Sydney. The aim of these guidelines is to assist superyacht masters Superyachts are free to enter and move around with their preparations for a visit to Sydney Harbour and to Sydney Harbour subject to compliance with the provide a reference document during the visit.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAKING of the NEWCASTLE INDUSTRIAL HUB 1915 to 1950
    THE MAKING OF THE NEWCASTLE INDUSTRIAL HUB 1915 to 1950 Robert Martin Kear M.Bus. (University of Southern Queensland) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of a Master of Philosophy in History January 2018 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Robert Kear ii ABSTRACT Aim of this Thesis The aim of this thesis is to chart the formation of the Newcastle Industrial Hub and to identify the men who controlled it, in its journey from Australian regional obscurity before 1915, to be the core of Australian steel manufacturing and technological development by 1950. This will be achieved through an examination of the progressive and consistent application of strategic direction and the adoption of manufacturing technologies that progressively lowered the manufacturing cost of steel. This thesis will also argue that, coupled with tariff and purchasing preferences assistance, received from all levels of government, the provision of integrated logistic support services from Newcastle’s public utilities and education services underpinned its successful commercial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioners of Inquiry 1
    Contents Commissioners of Inquiry 1 Letter to the Minister 2 Chairperson's Statement 3 The Commissioners and Their Role 4 Management and Structure 6 Local Government Inquiries 8 Performance Review 9 Year in Review - Report of Operations 10 Environmental Planning Issues 24 Appendices 26 Operating Statement 26 The Commissioners and Senior Staff 27 Schedule of Inquiries and Hearings 30 Inquiries and Hearings Reported in 1998-99 Cooranbong Colliery Extension, Morisset 10 Wynella Homestead, Goulburn 11 Sand and Gravel Quarry, Byron 11 Blue Mountains Draft LEP 12 Perisher Range Village Master Plan 13 Underground Coal Mine, Tahmoor North 15 Cowal Gold Project, West Wyalong 16 Donaldson Coal Mine, Cessnock/Maitland 17 Mushroom Substrate Facili ty, Hawkesbury 18 Landuse Planning, Illawarra Escarpment 19 Mount Pleasant Coal Mine, Muswellbrook 20 Commissioners ofInquiry Commissioners of Inquiry for Environment and Plan y appointed under the Environmental rlanning and Assessment Act 1979 to enable Public Inquiries into a range of environmental, planning and development issues, and conservation matters under the Heritage Act 1977. The Commissioners make findings and recommendations in their written reports to the Minister which are openly available to the public under planning legislation. The publication "Commissiom ofInquiry for Environment and Planning- How They WtJrk" is available from the Office. A Public Inquiry • Undertakes environmental, planning and conservation assessment of issues prior to State government decisions. • Affords equal opportunity for all interested parties to make submissions. • Enables thorough canvassing of all relevant issues in a public forum. • Provides independent advice in a written report to the Minister. The Commissioners' Objectives • To undertake Inquiries commissioned by the Minister consistent with legislative requirements, public participation objectives and the principles of natural justice and fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Existing Waterway Navigation and Usage
    Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd ABN 90 009 679 734 Level 18 2 ‐ 12 Macquarie Street Parramatta NSW 2150 Tel +612 9354 2600 Fax +612 9325 2695 www.hanson.com.au 1.0 Introduction This report is prepared in relation to a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) for an Aggregate Handling and Concrete Batching facility at Glebe Island (SSD 8854). Glebe Island currently operates as a working industrial port under the management of Ports Authority of NSW (Port Authority). The aggregate handling and concrete batching facility is proposed adjacent to the existing Glebe Island Berth 1 (GLB1) terminal. Aggregate is proposed to be delivered by ship to the GLB1 berth at Glebe Island. This report provides information relating to marine traffic, navigation and safety and outlines any potential maritime safety issues, and measures required to minimise and mitigate any impacts resulting from the proposed development. 2.0 Background The SSDA was submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment (DP&E) in March 2018 and subsequently placed on formal public exhibition for 5 weeks, between 11 April 2018 and 15 May 2018. On 20 August 2018, a Request for Additional Information (RFI) was issued by the DP&E. This report responds to the additional information sought in relation to the maritime traffic, safety and navigation impact assessment (Issues 30 – 32 under Schedule 1) for the new facility at Glebe Island. For the purposes of this SSDA, this statement provides a preliminary navigation impact assessment and outlines the general processes and guidelines in place that governs marine traffic flow within the context of the site at GLB1, Glebe Island and Sydney Harbour.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Analysis and Urban Design Objectives
    Rozelle Interchange Urban Design and Landscape Plan Contextual Analysis and Urban Design Objectives Artists impression: Pedestrian view along Victoria Road Caption(Landscape - Image shown description at full maturity and is indicative only). 03 White Bay Power Station Urban Design Objectives 3 Contextual analysis 3.1 Contextual analysis Local context WestConnex will extend from the M4 Motorway at The Rozelle Interchange will be a predominately Parramatta to Sydney Airport and the M5 underground motorway interchange with entry and Motorway, re-shaping the way people move exit points that connect to the wider transport through Sydney and generating urban renewal network at City West Link, Iron Cove and Anzac opportunities along the way. It will provide the Bridge. critical link between the M4 and M5, completing Sydney’s motorway network. Iron Cove and Rozelle Rail Yards sit on and are adjacent to disconnected urban environments. While the character varies along the route, the These conditions are the result of the historically WestConnex will be sensitively integrated into the typical approach to building large individual road built and natural environments to reconnect and systems which disconnect suburbs and greatly strengthen local communities and enhance the reduce the connectivity and amenity of sustainable form, function, character and liveability of Sydney. modes of transport such as cycling and walking. Rather than adding to the existing disconnection, An analysis of the Project corridor was undertaken the Project will provide increased
    [Show full text]
  • Melrose Park Southern Precinct Structure Plan August 2019 Prepared for City of Parramatta, August 2019
    Melrose Park Southern Precinct Structure Plan August 2019 Prepared for City of Parramatta, August 2019 Prepared By Holdmark Property Group Goodman 2/2-4 Giffnock Avenue, Level 17, 60 Castlereagh Street Macquarie Park, NSW 2113 Sydney NSW 2000 P: (02) 9889 5540 P: (02) 9230 7400 www.holdmark.com.au www.goodman.com Cox Architecture City Plan Services L6, 155 Clarence Street 120 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 Sydney NSW 2000 P: (02) 9267 9599 P: (02) 8270 3500 www.coxarchitecture.com.au www.cityplan.com.au MELROSE PARK SOUTHERN PRECINCT II STRUCTURE PLAN Contents VOLUME 1 Illustrative Response 27 1.0 Introduction 1 1.0 Movement Network 28 1.1 Background 2 1.1 Indicative Road Network 28 1.2 Purpose of the Southern Structure Plan 2 1.2 Indicative Cycle Network 29 1.3 Site Context 3 2.0 Built Form 30 1.4 Waterfront Renewal 4 2..1 Illustrative Plan 30 1.5 Southern Precinct Land Ownership 5 2.2 Floor Space Distribution 31 1.6 Precinct Extent 6 2.3 Waterfront Scale 32 1.8 City of Parramatta Priorities 7 2.4 Precinct Wide Built Form 33 1.9 Planning Processes 7 2.5 Street Form and Setbacks 34 2.6 Solar Access to Communal Open Space 35 2.0 Precinct Assessment 9 2.7 Built Form Orientation 36 2.1 Existing Uses 10 2.8 Overshadowing 37 2.2 Existing Controls 12 2.3 Site Conditions 13 Appendix 1 - Supporting Studies Summary 39 2.3.1 Landform 13 A1.1 Traffic 40 2.3.2 Vegetation 14 A1.2 Services 41 2.3.3 Access 15 A1.2.1 Power 41 2.3.4 Services 16 A1.2.2 Water 42 2.4 Northern Precinct Structure Plan 17 A1.2.3 Sewer 43 A1.2.4 Telecom 43 3.0 Structure Plan 19
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Statement
    Environmental Impact Statement Stadium Australia Renewal 15 Edwin Flack Avenue, Sydney Olympic Park Submitted to Department of Planning, Infrastructure and Environment On behalf of Infrastructure NSW 16 September 2019 | 2190435 CONTACT Alexis Cella Director [email protected] (02) 9956 6962 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. This document has been prepared by: This document has been reviewed by: Anna Nowland / Thomas Atkinson 13/09/19 Michael Oliver 13/09/19 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. Ethos Urban operates under a Quality Management System. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. If the report is not signed, it is a preliminary draft. Ethos Urban Pty Ltd ABN 13 615 087 931. www.ethosurban.com 173 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 t 61 2 9956 6952 Contents Statement of Validity 7 List of Abbreviations and Key Terms 8 Executive Summary 9 1.0 Introduction 14 1.1 Overview of the proposed development 14 1.2 Background to the development 14 1.3 Strategic need for the proposal 15 1.4 Objectives of the development 17 1.5 Analysis of alternatives 17 1.6 Secretary’s requirements 19 2.0 Site analysis 27 2.1 Site description and ownership 28 2.2 Surrounding development 40 3.0 Consultation 45 4.0 Description of the development 46 4.1 Numerical overview 46 4.2 Land use – ‘Recreation Facility (Major)’ and ancillary uses 47 4.3 Stadium design
    [Show full text]
  • Metro West Line to Drive New Development Friday, 23 March 2018
    Metro West line to drive new development Friday, 23 March 2018 The announcement that the proposed Metro West line will have a station at Westmead should stimulate new development in this precinct, says the Urban Taskforce. “The announcement by the NSW Government that there will be a Westmead station on the West Metro line is good news for this precinct,” says Urban Taskforce CEO, Chris Johnson. “The fast connection between Parramatta and Sydney will be a great stimulus for Parramatta and for key sites along the route. The announcement that stations are being considered at Camelia/ Rydalmere; North Burwood/ Five Dock/ Kings Bay and Pyrmont as well as the previously announced stations at Sydney Olympic Park and the Bays Precinct opens up great potential for new development.” “The West Metro line will be the key public transport artery underpinning Sydney’s growth. As indicated in the government’s media release the metro line could continue on to the new Western Sydney airport so linking the three cities proposed by the Greater Sydney Commission (GSC).” “The Urban Taskforce are strong supporters of the NSW Government’s commitment to public transport infrastructure and of the potential for new development to be located around the stations.” “There is however some confusion in the GSC’s Greater Sydney Region Plan about the potential for development along the Parramatta Road corridor which is adjacent to Metro West. Text on page 133 of the new plan implies that the GSC’s policies on protecting industrial land will not apply where the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy, released in November 2016, indicated residential development could occur on these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Glebe Island and White Bay Master Plan Incorporating the Ports Improvement Program and SEPP 61 Exempt and Complying Development November 2000 Introduction
    Glebe Island and White Bay Master Plan Incorporating the Ports Improvement Program and SEPP 61 Exempt and Complying Development November 2000 Introduction Glebe Island and White Bay form part of the area covered by State Regional Environmental Plan 26 (SREP 26). The State Government is committed to Sydney Harbour continuing to be a working harbour. Under the provisions of the SREP the site is zoned for “Port and Employment” uses. SREP 26 provides that development consent for development in the Glebe Island and White Bay Port Area is subject to a Master Plan adopted by the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning. The Glebe Island and White Bay Master Plan will control and direct the future development of the Port facilities. The consent authority must take the Master Plan into consideration when determining a development application. The Master Plan requires a Ports Improvement Program to be established. The Ports Improvement Program includes guidelines that will enhance the appearance of the port through landscaping, signage and selected colour schemes and provide standards against which development will be assessed. This document is divided into two parts: Part A Master Plan Part B Ports Improvement Program Each part is an independent document. Future development needs to consider both parts. In order to provide a comprehensive set of planning instruments relating to the Glebe Island and White Bay Master plan area, a copy of State Environmental Planning Policy 61 is attached. This provides a simpler approvals process for routine proposals and clarifies the extent of exempt and complying development on port land. Letters from the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning indicating adoption of the Master Plan, approval of the Port Improvement Program and gazettal of SEPP 61 have also been inserted in front of each relevant part.
    [Show full text]