DOCSLIB.ORG

Zeki Demirkubuz Sineması'nın Varoluşçuluk Açısından Ncelenmesi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zeki Demirkubuz Sineması'nın Varoluşçuluk Açısından Ncelenmesi T. C. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Radyo Televizyon Sinema Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi Zeki Demirkubuz Sineması’nın Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelenmesi Yelda Yanat 2501050492 Tez Danı şmanı Doç. Dr. Ne şe Kars İstanbul, 2008 ÖNSÖZ Günümüz kültür endüstrilerinin en büyü ğü olan sinema, aynı zamanda sanat dalı olarak tabi ki endüstrinin kalıplarının ve dayatmalarının dı şında eserler vermek için sava şımını sürdürmektedir. Bu sava şımın Türkiye’de en önemli temsilcilerinden biri hiç kusursuz ba ğımsız sinemacımız Zeki Demirkubuz’dur. Zeki Demirkubuz’un filmlerindeki varolu şçu dü şüncenin etkileri onun sinemasının da temelini olu şturur. Bu çalı şmamızda Zeki Demirkubuz’un filmlerinin varolu şçu açıdan inceleyerek sonuçlarını açıklamaya çalı ştık. Bu çalı şmada ilk gününden beri anlayı ş ve sabırla her türlü bilgi ve deneyimini benimle payla şan danı şmanım Sayın Doç. Dr. Ne şe Kars’a ve de ğerli hocam Doç. Dr. Battal Odaba ş’a te şekkür borçluyum. Ayrıca di ğer hocalarım Doç. Dr. Ceyhan Kandemir, Doç. Dr. Arzu Kihtir ve Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ergün Yolcu’ya ve tezin hazırlanması a şamasında bana her türlü deste ği veren e şime ve aileme te şekkür ederim. İstanbul, 2008 Yelda Yanat i İÇİNDEK İLER Önsöz......................................................................................................................................................i İçindekiler..............................................................................................................................................ii Öz - Abstract..........................................................................................................................................v GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................................ ........1 I. BÖLÜM VAROLU ŞÇULUK FELSEFES İ..........................................................................................................3 1.1. Varolu şçulu ğun Tanımı........................................................................................................3 1.2. Varolu şçulu ğun Ortaya Çıkı şı ve ve Varolu şçu Dü şünürler................................................8 1.2.1 Öncü : Soren Kierkegaard.......................................................................................13 1.2.2 Gabriel Marcel ve Karl Jaspers...............................................................................15 1.2.3 Martin Heidegger....................................................................................................18 1.2.4 Jean Paul Sartre.......................................................................................................21 1.2.5 Maurice Merleau - Ponty........................................................................................24 1.3. Varolu şçulu ğun Temaları...................................................................................................27 1.3.1. İnsan Varlı ğının Olumsallı ğı-Nedensizlik,Saçma.................................................27 1.3.2. Usun Güçsüzlü ğü- Yanılsama,Yalan ve İkiyüzlülük............................................28 1.3.3. İnsan Varlı ğının Sıçrayı şı- İç Sıkıntısı, Bulantı.....................................................29 1.3.4. İnsan Varlı ğının İncinirli ği, Kötülük.....................................................................30 1.3.5. Yabancıla şma.........................................................................................................31 1.3.5.1. Güçsüzlük...............................................................................................33 1.3.5.2. Anlamsızlık............................................................................................33 1.3.5.3. Kuralsızlık..............................................................................................33 1.3.5.4. Kültürel Yaygınla şma............................................................................33 1.3.5.5. Toplumdan Yalıtlanma..........................................................................33 1.3.5.6. Kendine Yabancıla şma..........................................................................33 1.3.6. Sonluluk ve Ölümün İvedili ği- Ölüm, İntihar......................................... ...........35 1.3.7. Yalnızlık ve Giz - İleti şimsizlik..........................................................................38 1.3.8. Hiçlik –Yazgı, Vicdan.........................................................................................39 ii II. BÖLÜM SİNEMADA VAROLU ŞÇULUK ve ZEK İ DEM İRKUBUZ S İNEMASI .......................................41 2.1. Sanatta Varolu şçuluk.........................................................................................................41 2.1.1. Edebiyatta Varolu şçuluk........................................................................................43 2.1.2. Sinemada Varolu şçuluk.........................................................................................48 2.2. Zeki Demirkubuz Sineması................................................................................................54 2.2.1. Ba ğımsız Sinema..................................................................................................54 2.2.2. Auteur Sineması...................................................................................................60 2.2.3. Minimalist Sinema................................................................................................64 2.3. Zeki Demirkubuz’un Kısa Ya şam Öyküsü.........................................................................68 2.3.1. Zeki Demirkubuz’un Ya şamının Filmlerine Etkisi...............................................73 III. BÖLÜM ZEK İ DEM İRKUBUZ F İLMLER İNİN VAROLU ŞÇULUK AÇISINDAN İNCELENMES İ 3.1. C Blok...............................................................................................................................77 3.1.1. Öykü.....................................................................................................................77 3.1.2. Karakterler............................................................................................................79 3.1.3. C Blok’un Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi...................................................81 3.2. Masumiyet........................................................................................................................82 3.2.1. Öykü.....................................................................................................................82 3.2.2. Karakterler............................................................................................................85 3.2.3. Masumiyet’in Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi.............................................86 3.3. Üçüncü Sayfa ..................................................................................................................88 3.3.1. Öykü.....................................................................................................................88 3.3.2. Karakterler............................................................................................................92 3.3.3. Üçüncü Sayfa’nın Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi....................................92 3.4. Yazgı................................................................................................................................94 3.4.1. Öykü.....................................................................................................................94 3.4.2. Karakterler............................................................................................................98 3.4.3. Yazgı’nın Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi....................................................99 iii 3.5. İtiraf.................................................................................................................................100 3.5.1. Öykü...................................................................................................................100 3.5.2. Karakterler..........................................................................................................103 3.5.3. İtiraf’ın Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi.....................................................103 3.6. Bekleme Odası................................................................................................................105 3.6.1. Öykü...................................................................................................................105 3.6.2. Karakterler..........................................................................................................108 3.6.3. Bekleme Odası’nın Varolu şçuluk Açısından İncelemesi................................109 3.7. Kader...............................................................................................................................111 SONUÇ....................................................................................................................................112 KAYNAKÇA...........................................................................................................................115 EKLER.....................................................................................................................................120 iv ÖZ Bir “auteur” olarak, minimalist ve ba ğımsız sinema yapan Zeki Demirkubuz , dünyanın en saygın film festivali Cannes’ın Belirli Bir Bakı ş Açısı Bölümü’nde iki filmi birden aynı
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cinema and Politics
    Cinema and Politics Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe, Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy This book first published 2009 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2009 by Deniz Bayrakdar and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-0343-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-0343-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Images and Tables ......................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................................ xi Introduction ............................................................................................. xvii ‘Son of Turks’ claim: ‘I’m a child of European Cinema’ Deniz Bayrakdar Part I: Politics of Text and Image Chapter One ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Between: a Panorama of Cinema in Turkey
    THE SPACE BETWEEN: A PANORAMA OF CINEMA IN TURKEY FILM LIST “The Space Between: A Panorama of Cinema in Turkey” will take place at the Walter Reade Theater at Lincoln Center from April 27 – May 10, 2012. Please note this list is subject to change. AĞIT a week. Subsequently, Zebercet begins an impatient vigil Muhtar (Ali Şen), a member of the town council, sells a piece and, when she does not return, descends into a psychopathic of land in front of his home to Haceli (Erol Taş), a land ELEGY breakdown. dispute arises between the two families and questions of Yılmaz Güney, 1971. Color. 80 min. social and moral justice come into play. In Ağıt, Yılmaz Güney stars as Çobanoğlu, one of four KOSMOS smugglers living in a desolate region of eastern Turkey. Reha Erdem, 2009. Color. 122 min. SELVİ BOYLUM, AL YAZMALIM Greed, murder and betrayal are part of the everyday life of THE GIRL WITH THE RED SCARF these men, whose violence sharply contrasts with the quiet Kosmos, Reha Erdem’s utopian vision of a man, is a thief who Atıf Yılmaz, 1977. Color. 90 min. determination of a woman doctor (Sermin Hürmeriç) who works miracles. He appears one morning in the snowy border attends to the impoverished villagers living under constant village of Kars, where he is welcomed with open arms after Inspired by the novel by Kyrgyz writer Cengiz Aytmatov, Selvi threat of avalanche from the rocky, eroded landscape. saving a young boy’s life. Despite Kosmos’s curing the ill and Boylum, Al Yazmalım tells the love story of İlyas (Kadir İnanır), performing other miracles, the town begins to turn against a truck driver from Istanbul, his new wife Asya (Türkan Şoray) him when it is learned he has fallen in love with a local girl.
    [Show full text]
  • Climates a Film by Nuri Bilge Ceylan
    WINNER FIPRESCI PRIZE IN COMPETITION 2006 Cannes Film Festival climates a film by Nuri Bilge Ceylan A Zeitgeist Films Release climates a film by Nuri Bilge Ceylan Winner of the prestigious Fipresci Award at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival, CLIMATES is internationally acclaimed writer-director Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s sublime follow-up to his Cannes multi-award winner DISTANT. Beautifully drawn and meticulously observed, the film vividly recalls the cinema of Italian master Michelangelo Antonioni with its poetic use of landscape and the incisive, exquisitely visual rendering of loneliness, loss and the often-elusive nature of happiness. During a sweltering summer vacation on the Aegean coast, the relationship between middle-aged professor Isa (played by Ceylan himself ) and his younger, television producer girlfriend Bahar (the luminous Ebru Ceylan, Ceylan’s real-life wife) brutally implodes. Back in Istanbul that fall, Isa rekindles a torrid affair with a previous lover. But when he learns that Bahar has left the city for a job in the snowy East, he follows her there to win her back. Boasting subtly powerful performances, heart-stoppingly stunning cinematography (Ceylan’s first work in high definition) and densely textured sound design, CLIMATES is the Turkish filmmaker’s most gorgeous rumination yet on the fragility and complexity of human relationships. BIOGRAPHIES Nuri Bilge Ceylan (Isa / Director-Screenwriter) Since winning the Grand Prize at Cannes in 2003 for DISTANT (Uzak), Nuri Bilge Ceylan, the ‘Lone Wolf ’ of Turkish cinema, has been critically acclaimed for his spare and unaffected style of filmmaking, inviting comparisons to Tarkovsky, Bresson and Kiarostami. Humorous and masterful, his is a cinema that spans the modern experi- ence: examining rural life, relationships, masculinity, and urban alienation.
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Sinema Tarihi
    TÜRK SİNEMA TARİHİ RADYO TELEVİZYON VE SİNEMA BÖLÜMÜ DOÇ. DR. ŞÜKRÜ SİM İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ Yazar Notu Elinizdeki bu eser, İstanbul Üniversitesi Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Fakültesi’nde okutulmak için hazırlanmış bir ders notu niteliğindedir. İÇİNDEKİLER 1. SİNEMANIN TÜRKİYE'YE GELİŞİ VE TÜRKİYE'DE YAPILAN İLK FİLMLER ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. SİNEMACILAR DÖNEMİ-2(1950-1970) ......................................................... 27 3. SİNEMACILAR DÖNEMİ(1950-1970) ............................................................ 53 4. KARŞITLIKLAR DÖNEMİ(1970-1980) .......................................................... 78 5. HAFTA DERS NOTU ........................................................................................... 98 6. VİZE ÖNCESİ GENEL DEĞERLENDİRME ................................................. 117 7. VİZE ÖNCESİ TEKRAR ................................................................................. 143 8. 1980 DÖNEMİ TÜRK SİNEMASI(1980-1990) .............................................. 158 9. 1980 DÖNEMİ TÜRK SİNEMASI(1980-1990) .............................................. 175 10. YENİ DÖNEM TÜRKİYE SİNEMASI ............................................................ 191 11. TÜRK SİNEMASINDA SANSÜR ................................................................... 201 12. MİLLİ SİNEMA ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derviş Zaim SINEMASI UZERINE BIR Inceleme 20021649
    KKTC YAKIN DOGU ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN VE SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ RADYO-TELEVİZYON ANA BİLİM DALI KENARDAKİLER VE SİNEMA: . / .. DERViŞ ZAiM SINEMASI UZERINE BIR iNCELEME YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Halil DAVULCU 20021649 Danışman Doç. n-. Ahmet ÇİGDEM Lefkoşa - 2004 Halil Davulcu: Kenardakiler ve Sinema, Derviş Zaim Sineması Üzerine Bir İnceleme Fen ve Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü Prof. Dr. Fakhraddin Mamedov ~ .. Tez.l1/P.'I/P.'I Tarihinde Aşağıdaki Jüri Uyeleri tarafından Oy Birliği I Oy Çokluğu ile Kabul Edilmiştir. , Jüri Üyeleri: Prof. Dr. Levent Köker, Dekan, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, İletişim Fakültesi Doç. Dr. Ahmet Çiğdem, Danışman, Gazi Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yard. Doç. Dr. İbrahim Özejder, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, İletişim Fakültesi ÖZET Türk Film Endüstrisi son on yılda bir kendisini yeniden kurma sürecindedir. Bu süreç, stilleri eski Yeşilçamı temsil eden yönetmenlerden bütünüyle farklı genç kuşak yönetmenlerin kendi filmlerini üretmeleri ve Holywood filmlerinin sinemayı popüler düzeye taşımaları, film yapımcılarını sinemaya yatırım yapma ve yerel ürünleri dağıtma konusunda cesaretlendirmeleri olgularıyla ortaya çıkmıştır. Reklam endüstrisindeki gelişmeler hem insan j malzemesi hem de maddi/teknik donanım sunma konusunda Türk sinemasının yapısal organizasyonunu desteklemesi olgusu da bu çerçevede zikredilmelidir. Buna ilave olarak, Türkiye'nin her yerindeki iletişim ve güzel sanatlar fakültelerinin sayısındaki artış da, I endüstride kullanılabilecek kapasitede ve eğitimde insan gücünü üretmektedir. Bu gelişme sadece endüstrinin yapısında değil, aynı zamanda Türk Sineması'nın üslup ve söyleminde de ortaya çıkmıştır. İçsel gerilimi açıkca yerıi-gerçekci, 'kara film', deneysel ve geleneksel hikaye anlatma biçiminden ırak bir sinema dili ortaya çıkmıştır. Kamera şimdi, yoksul, öteki, yabancı ve sınıfsızlaştırılmış üzerindedir, yönetmen, aynı zamanda bir kameraman, metin yazarı, editör, oyuncu ve nihayet bir yapımcıdır da.
    [Show full text]
  • Uzun Film Kataloğu
    Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism Oğlak Yayınları II come to my voice sesime gel turkey 2010, 35mm, 90’, colour director Hüseyin Karabey script Hüseyin Karabey production Emre Yeksan, Asi Film, Elmadağ Cad. 6/3 Şişli 34373 Istanbul T +90 212 225 3944 [email protected] In a snowy Kurdish mountain village in eastern Turkey, Berfé, an old woman, and Jiyan, her young granddaughter, are troubled when the only man of the household, Temo, the son of one and father of the other, is arrested and taken into custody by the local gendarmerie. The commanding officer has received word that the villagers are hiding guns. It is announced that all the men of the village will be kept in custody until their families submit and hand over the guns they are hiding. But the problem is there are no guns, at least to the knowledge of these two blameless women. Despairing and on their own, Berfé and Jiyan are faced with a long journey in search of a gun that they can exchange for their beloved Temo. But how can their innocence and naivety find a way out in a system that threatens, eventually, to drag them into the sullied world of an interminable conflict? Hüseyin Karabey (1970) has been making films since 1996. He graduated from the Film and Television Department of Marmara University in 2001. His involvement in the democracy movement in the 90s and his background as a documentarian have determined the style and the content of his subsequent film work. His first feature film My Marlon and Brando was selected for the Rotterdam Film Festival and had its North American premiere at Tribeca, where it won Hüseyin Karabey the Best Director award.
    [Show full text]
  • New Turkish Cinema – Some Remarks on the Homesickness of the Turkish Soul
    New Turkish Cinema – Some Remarks on the Homesickness of the Turkish Soul Agnieszka Ayşen KAIM, University of Lodz, [email protected] Abstract Contemporary cinematography reflects the dualism in modern Turkish society. The heart of every inhabitant of Anatolia is dominated by homesickness for his little homeland. This overpowering feeling affects common people migrating in search of work as well as intellectuals for whom Istanbul is a place for their artistic development but not the place of origin. The city and “the rest” have been considered in opposition to each other. The struggle between “the provincial” and “the urban” has even created its own film genre in Turkish cinematography described as “homeland movies”. They paint the portrait of a Turkish middle class intellectual on the horns of a dilemma, the search for a modern identity and a place to belong in a modern world where values are constantly shifting. Special Issue: 1 (2011) | ISSN 2158-8724 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cinej.2011.23 | http://cinej.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. New Turkish Cinema – Some Remarks on the Homesickness of the Turkish Soul For decades „It„s like a Turkish film” has been an expression with negative associations, being synonymous with kitch and banal. Over the last 10 years, Turkish cinematography has become recognised as the “New cinema of Turkey” thanks to appearances in festivals in Rotterdam, Linz, New York and Wrocław, Poland (“Era New Horizons”, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • TUR 329: TURKISH CINEMA Spring 2019
    University of Texas at Austin Department of Middle Eastern Studies TUR 329: TURKISH CINEMA Spring 2019 Unique #: 41385 Course Hours and Room: Instructor: Jeannette Okur MWF 12:00-1:00 PM in PAR 103 Office: CAL 509 Office Hours: T-TH 11:00 AM-12:00 PM Email: jeannette.okur @austin.utexas.edu or by appointment Course Description: Global flows of information, technology, and people have defined Turkish cinema since its inception in the early 20th century. This course, taught entirely in Turkish, will introduce different approaches to studying cinema, while also providing students with the opportunity to achieve advanced-level language skills. This is a screening-intensive course, and we will watch a wide range of films, including popular, arthouse, auteur-made, generic, and independent works. In each unit, we will read film history and criticism in both Turkish and English and closely examine primary sources in their original language. Our goal will be to determine what constitutes Turkish cinema as a national cinema and identify the ways in which its constitutive elements are part of transnational movements. To this end, we will discuss the socio-political contexts, industrial trends, aesthetic sensitivities, and representation strategies of selected films. By constantly reformulating the essential question of “what Turkish cinema is,” we seek to understand how Turkey’s filmmakers, critics, cultural policy-makers, and viewers have answered this question in different historical periods. Prerequisite: TUR 320K/TUR381K with a letter grade of C or higher (or via placement via successful performance on the DMES Turkish placement exam) Language/Content Learning Objectives: By the end of TUR 329 you will, inşallah: • initiate, sustain, and close a general conversation with a number of strategies appropriate to a range of circumstances and topics, despite errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeki Demirkubuz Sinemasinda Melodramatik Imgelem
    T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ RADYO TELEVİZYON VE SİNEMA ANABİLİM DALI ZEKİ DEMİRKUBUZ SİNEMASINDA MELODRAMATİK İMGELEM Yüksek Lisans Tezi N. Göksun ÖZHAN Tez Danışmanı Prof. Dr. S. Ruken Öztürk Ankara - 2011 İÇİNDEKİLER GİRİŞ .......................................................................................................................... 1 1. SANAT SİNEMASI VE MELODRAMATİK İMGELEM ................................ 5 1.1. Melodram türünün ve melodramatik imgelemin ortaya çıkışı ....................... 6 1.1.1. Yeni bir anlam yaratma aracı ...................................................................... 9 1.1.2. Trajedinin neresinde? ................................................................................ 12 1.1.2.1. Burjuvadan burjuvaya, burjuva yaşamı hakkında .............................. 14 1.1.2.2. İkiye bölünen trajik özne .................................................................... 17 1.1.2.3. Modernitenin eylemsiz kahramanları ................................................. 19 1.2. Ticari sinema ve sanat sinemasında melodramatik imgelem ........................ 24 1.2.1. Ana akım sinemada melodram ................................................................. 25 1.2.1.1. Sistemin yeniden üretimine hizmet eden bir tür olarak melodram .... 25 1.2.1.2. Hollywood‟un başat estetik biçimi olarak melodram ........................ 28 1.2.2. Melodramın ideolojik aksaması ................................................................ 33 1.2.3. Sanat sinemasında melodramatik imgelem..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silencing on Board Silent Representations of Women in the New Turkish Cinema
    Silencing On Board Silent Representations of Women in the New Turkish Cinema By Ozlem Guclu Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Professor Jasmina Lukic Budapest, Hungary CEU eTD Collection 2007 Abstract: This study explores the functions of the different forms of silences of the female characters on the New Turkish Cinema screen through representative examples. I discuss the functions of the silences of female stories, female point of view and female characters under the four main types of silences- silencing silences, resisting silences, complete silences and speaking silences in order to reveal both the dominant meanings and the possibilities and limits of the alternative meanings. CEU eTD Collection I Acknowledgements: I want to thank my supervisor Jasmina Lukic for her tremendous support, and for everything she taught me. She is the one who always trusted in my work and motivated me every time I lost my patience and energy. I want to thank all of my dear friends for making life bearable, easier and fun during the thesis writing period. CEU eTD Collection II Table of Contents: Introduction:.........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: The New Turkish Cinema and Women's Silences............................................4 1.1 The New Turkish Cinema: .........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Reha Erdem and the Magic of Cinema
    Markets, Globalization & Development Review Volume 2 Number 2 Popular Culture and Markets in Article 8 Turkey 2017 The Big World – Reha Erdem and the Magic of Cinema Andreas Treske Bilkent University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Treske, Andreas (2017) "The Big World – Reha Erdem and the Magic of Cinema," Markets, Globalization & Development Review: Vol. 2: No. 2, Article 8. DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2017-02-02-08 Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol2/iss2/8https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol2/ iss2/8 This Media Review is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Markets, Globalization & Development Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Big World – Reha Erdem and the Magic of Cinema This media review is available in Markets, Globalization & Development Review: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ mgdr/vol2/iss2/8 Treske: The Big World Film Review The Big World – Reha Erdem and the magic of cinema A boy, not older than 16, carrying the lifeless body of a much younger girl on his back, runs out of a forest towards a street, holding out his hand to stop cars. Wearing a moustache like a young Errol Flynn, his mimic and gestures are desperate and helpless. Next, the boy on a motorcycle followed by images of the city at night. Against the light, in a mystic atmospheric forest, a girl runs, followed by the boy in the distance while a poetic voice in Turkish says: “If I say to the hole ‘you are my father’, if I say to the wolf ‘you are my mother, my brother’, you see, then where is hope?” These are the first few seconds of the trailer to Reha Erdem’s latest film “Big Big World” (Koca Dünya) from 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • New Turkish Cinema” Arif Can Güngör, [email protected]
    From Past to Present: A Cognitive Work On “New Turkish Cinema” Arif Can Güngör, [email protected] Volume 4.1 (2014) | ISSN 2158-8724 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cinej.2014.121 | http://cinej.pitt.edu Abstract In recent years, “new” concept has become very consumable especially within the context of politics in our country. Generally, after certain periods in Turkey, “new”, representative of political changes and emphasizing reconstruction process, has been a concept that frequently used in parallel with political, social, economic and cultural use, from past to present. Turkish cinema has had many periods from its constructive years to present; some of which have been in difficulties and crises. Having been overcome after every crisis, Turkish Cinema has always recovered itself. After this recovery, process to be rising or expected to be shown up, has wanted to be emphasized by the characterization of the “new” concept, needed to be created or created different structure. The search of the young directors for an alternative cinema language, experiencing types, using various production and filming styles have revealed a richness in development of our cinema. In this essay, New Cinema concept will be introduced in terms of its usage and meanings attributed to it in Turkish cinema. Moreover, its place and importance in Turkish cinema history will be discussed. Keywords: New Turkish Cinema, Yeşilçam, New Cinema. New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Show full text]