DOCSLIB.ORG

Taylor Smith Ms. Kelly Honors English I December 12Th, 2012 Do Unto

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taylor Smith Ms. Kelly Honors English I December 12Th, 2012 Do Unto Smith 1 Taylor Smith Ms. Kelly Honors English I December 12th, 2012 Do Unto Others: Basic Tests of Character in The Odyssey One of the first Sunday school lessons a child learns is the old cliché to treat everyone else how he or she would want to be treated. For most, this means being treated well, which is often defined as receiving kindness and care from others. Bob Sutton certainly had these ideals in mind when he said, “The best judge of character is how he or she treats those with less power.” (“What is a true test of a person’s character?”) Sutton is stating that the ideal person treats everyone, whether they are the simplest, poorest beggar or the highest ruler, as well as he would want to be treated. It is a common theme within humans to “suck up” to those of greater power in order to achieve a selfish goal of gleaning some of the wealth and power from those people. The opposite is also disgustingly common among humans -- they treat those with less power as unequal and as inferior to themselves, and sometimes it can even turn into violence or torment, both physically and psychologically. However, Sutton says that the best people are able to look past the label of a person’s social status and treat them with all the kindness and care that they would treat themselves. Nowhere are these ideals more common than in Homer’s The Odyssey, where Odysseus, king of Ithaca, disguises himself as a beggar to learn more about how his kingdom and his people have changed while he has been gone. He examines which of his people he can still trust by seeing how they react when Nobody is listening. He primarily examines the Smith 2 goatherd Melanthius, the cowherd Philoetius, and the suitor Ctesippus to observe their true character. These men figure that they can be themselves, whether inside they are merciful or vicious, around the “lowly” beggar. Odysseus learns the true character of his subjects through careful observation of how they treat one who is lower than themselves on the social status triangle. The men also receive punishments or rewards based on what is at their cores. Melanthius is a goatherd who worked under Odysseus while he was still ruling as king of Ithaca. As a goatherd, he is nearly at the bottom of the social triangle, and is only just above the lowly beggars of the kingdom, like Odysseus is masquerading as. Despite this low social status, he has swagger, and saunters into the dining room of the richest and most powerful man in the kingdom as if he is of a much greater status. Although he is only a little bit higher on the social triangle, Melanthius acts and talks to Odysseus as though he is the mightiest king and Odysseus is the lowest and dirtiest scum on the planet. He scorns Odysseus: “Why don’t you cart yourself away?...We’ll never part, I swear, till we taste each other’s fists... your begging [makes] us sick!...we’re hardly the only banquet on the island.” (Homer 416) This action of his further clarifies the basic human ideal that it is easier to criticize than to compliment. If Melanthius had not found work as the king’s goatherd, he might have been in the same situation as Odysseus is pretending to have: begging for every meal and scorned by all. Melanthius makes it seem as though he is the one in charge in the dining room by stating that his begging makes them all sick; however, the “beggar” is actually an honored guest of the prince Telemachus and should be treated as such. He claims that he is completely opposed to the idea of begging at another’s table for scraps and leftovers, yet that is basically what he and Penelope’s suitors are doing: scrounging off the absent king of Ithaca and draining all of his wealth and resources. Melanthius’ Smith 3 begging is just more subtle; he is only willing to go with the “winning side.” By being in the favor of whom he thinks is the winning side (the suitors), he hopes for his status to rise in the social triangle as power shifts. Even though he appears to be a beggar, Odysseus has kept the physical strength and ability he had as an able fighter in Troy. The goatherd Melanthius goes as far to threaten the king. This could be seen as treason if Odysseus were to appear in his full glory, and it speaks badly about his character. It is also problematic to treat an old man this way based upon the societal view of elders. They are viewed as wise men who are deserving of respect and protection; Melanthius does not treat the old man Odysseus with any sort of respect. Odysseus’ examination of Melanthius proves that on the outside, he is an overly self-confident man who acts as if he is of a much higher social class. This bravado of self-confidence masks self-esteem issues on the inside, shown by the fact that he is only willing to be on the winning side. The cowherd Philoetius, however, proves to be the complete opposite of Melanthius, despite their similar social class. Philoetius worked as a cowherd while Odysseus was still reigning as king of Ithaca, and he still tends to the king’s best cows. As a cowherd, he is also quite low on the social triangle, yet he knows his place and dutifully fulfills his job. Somehow, he is able to comprehend the beggar’s plight and knows that the gods have forced him into so much trouble. He is even kind enough to pray for Odysseus’ luck and safe return home. Philoetius sympathizes with what Odysseus is going through by begging because he is also poor, and knows it, unlike Melanthius. Philoetius proves that he is loyal to his old king and wishes for his return: “What a traitor I’d be, with the prince still alive, if I’d run off to some other country...but isn’t it worse to...[tend] the herds for upstarts, not their owners---suffering all the pains of hell?..It’s unbearable here...but I still dream of my old master...” (Homer 417) He has the same beliefs about the suitors that Odysseus holds: Smith 4 that they are nothing but greedy, gluttonous, and ungrateful moochers who are a problem that must be dealt with. Philoetius understands the oath that he promised Odysseus, his old master, and knows it would be treason if he leaves. Philoetius is also extremely loyal to his king, proven by the fact that he is one of the few to wish for his return, and it would have a terrible effect on his conscience to leave his master’s son while the suitors ravage his kingdom. He realizes the wrath the gods would have upon him if he leaves, but he also has personal reasons for staying. Philoetius could have fled to another, more prosperous land, with no suitors, where his abilities as a cowherd would be appreciated and needed. He turns this down to stay with all the pain of having to breed cows for the suitors in exchange for the slim chance that his old master Odysseus will return. He further proves his loyalty by promising to use his “fighting arms in action” (Homer 418) if the true king of Ithaca ever achieves his long-awaited goal of reaching home. In Philoetius, Odysseus has clearly found someone whom he can trust and side with when he decides to finally put his plan to kill all the suitors into action. But where Philoetius is kind and thoughtful, Ctesippus, a suitor, is mean and brazen. Ctesippus is a suitor who has come to the kingdom of Ithaca to court Penelope, the wife of the absent king. Ctesippus fits the stereotypical image of the spoiled rich kid: he is self-confident to a level where he thinks that he is above everyone he meets, and he treats those below him on the triangle as scum and undeserving of life. He is sarcastic and is used to having all the attention on him. Looking to attract more attention, Ctesippus verbally harasses Odysseus: “from the start our guest has had his fair share...how impolite it would be...to scant whatever guest...I’ll give him a proper guest-gift...[he grabs] an oxhoof...[flings] it straight at the king...” (Homer 420) Usually, gifts given to honored guests of the royal court are lavish presents which are practical for use. The “gift” Ctesippus gives to Odysseus actually could harm him and potentially kill him. Smith 5 If Odysseus was actually there in his full glory, Ctesippus would be telling him what he wants to hear and trying to win his favor. Yet when Odysseus is acting as a beggar, Ctesippus is potentially committing the highest form of treason: murder of a king. Through this incident, Odysseus also learns more about the young man whom Telemachus has grown up to be. Telemachus threatens death for Ctesippus if the ox hoof had actually struck his honored guest, a clear example of the revenge code. Through this examination of one of the worst suitors, Odysseus further solidifies the idea in his mind that none of the suitors are virtuous: they are all greedy, gluttonous, lustful, and ungrateful men willing only to drain the resources of the once great kingdom of Ithaca. A general cliche in life is that “what goes around comes around,” basically meaning that for every wrong there will be a wrong in return, and for every good deed there will be a good deed in return.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the Odyssey, Part 1: the Adventures of Odysseus
    from The Odyssey, Part 1: The Adventures of Odysseus Homer, translated by Robert Fitzgerald ANCHOR TEXT | EPIC POEM Archivart/Alamy Stock Photo Archivart/Alamy This version of the selection alternates original text The poet, Homer, begins his epic by asking a Muse1 to help him tell the story of with summarized passages. Odysseus. Odysseus, Homer says, is famous for fighting in the Trojan War and for Dotted lines appear next to surviving a difficult journey home from Troy.2 Odysseus saw many places and met many the summarized passages. people in his travels. He tried to return his shipmates safely to their families, but they 3 made the mistake of killing the cattle of Helios, for which they paid with their lives. NOTES Homer once again asks the Muse to help him tell the tale. The next section of the poem takes place 10 years after the Trojan War. Odysseus arrives in an island kingdom called Phaeacia, which is ruled by Alcinous. Alcinous asks Odysseus to tell him the story of his travels. I am Laertes’4 son, Odysseus. Men hold me formidable for guile5 in peace and war: this fame has gone abroad to the sky’s rim. My home is on the peaked sea-mark of Ithaca6 under Mount Neion’s wind-blown robe of leaves, in sight of other islands—Dulichium, Same, wooded Zacynthus—Ithaca being most lofty in that coastal sea, and northwest, while the rest lie east and south. A rocky isle, but good for a boy’s training; I shall not see on earth a place more dear, though I have been detained long by Calypso,7 loveliest among goddesses, who held me in her smooth caves to be her heart’s delight, as Circe of Aeaea,8 the enchantress, desired me, and detained me in her hall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Odyssey and the Desires of Traditional Narrative
    The Odyssey and the Desires of Traditional Narrative David F. Elmer* udk: 82.0-3 Harvard University udk: 821.14-13 [email protected] Original scientific paper Taking its inspiration from Peter Brooks’ discussion of the “narrative desire” that structures novels, this paper seeks to articulate a specific form of narrative desire that would be applicable to traditional oral narratives, the plots of which are generally known in advance by audience members. Thematic and structural features of theOdyssey are discussed as evidence for the dynamics of such a “traditional narrative desire”. Keywords: Narrative desire, Peter Brooks, Odyssey, oral tradition, oral literature In a landmark 1984 essay entitled “Narrative Desire”, Peter Brooks argued that every literary plot is structured in some way by desire.1 In his view, the desires of a plot’s protagonist, whether these are a matter of ambition, greed, lust, or even simply the will to survive, determine the plot’s very readability or intelligibility. Moreover, for Brooks the various desires represented within narrative figure the desires that drive the production and consumption of narrative. He finds within the narrative representation of desire reflections of the desire that compels readers to read on, to keep turning pages, and ultimately of an even more fundamental desire, a “primary human drive” that consists simply in the “need to tell” (Brooks 1984, 61). The “reading of plot,” he writes, is “a form of desire that carries us forward, onward, through the text” (Brooks 1984, 37). When he speaks of “plot”, Brooks has in mind a particular literary form: the novel, especially as exemplified by 19th-century French realists like Honoré de Balzac and Émile Zola.
    [Show full text]
  • The Odyssey Homer Translated Lv Robert Fitzç’Erald
    I The Odyssey Homer Translated lv Robert Fitzç’erald PART 1 FAR FROM HOME “I Am Odysseus” Odysseus is in the banquet hail of Alcinous (l-sin’o-s, King of Phaeacia (fë-a’sha), who helps him on his way after all his comrades have been killed and his last vessel de stroyed. Odysseus tells the story of his adventures thus far. ‘I am Laertes’ son, Odysseus. [aertes Ia Men hold me formidable for guile in peace and war: this fame has gone abroad to the sky’s rim. My home is on the peaked sea-mark of Ithaca 4 Ithaca ith’. k) ,in island oft under Mount Neion’s wind-blown robe of leaves, the west e ast it C reece. in sight of other islands—Dulichium, Same, wooded Zacynthus—Ithaca being most lofty in that coastal sea, and northwest, while the rest lie east and south. A rocky isle, but good for a boy’s training; I (I 488 An Epic Poem I shall not see on earth a place more dear, though I have been detained long by Calypso,’ 12. Calypso k1ip’sö). loveliest among goddesses, who held me in her smooth caves, to be her heart’s delight, as Circe of Aeaea, the enchantress, 15 15. Circe (sür’së) of Aeaea e’e-). desired me, and detained me in her hail. But in my heart I never gave consent. Where shall a man find sweetness to surpass his OWfl home and his parents? In far lands he shall not, though he find a house of gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Myths and Legends: Odysseus and His Odyssey, the Short Version by Caroline H
    Myths and Legends: Odysseus and his odyssey, the short version By Caroline H. Harding and Samuel B. Harding, adapted by Newsela staff on 01.10.17 Word Count 1,415 Level 1030L Escaping from the island of the Cyclopes — one-eyed, ill-tempered giants — the hero Odysseus calls back to the shore, taunting the Cyclops Polyphemus, who heaves a boulder at the ship. Painting by Arnold Böcklin in 1896. SECOND: A drawing of a cyclops, courtesy of CSA Images/B&W Engrave Ink Collection and Getty Images. Greek mythology began thousands of years ago because there was a need to explain natural events, disasters, and events in history. Myths were created about gods and goddesses who had supernatural powers, human feelings and looked human. These ideas were passed down in beliefs and stories. The following stories are about Odysseus, the son of the king of the Greek island of Ithaca and a hero, who was described to be as wise as Zeus, king of the gods. For 10 years, the Greek army battled the Trojans in the walled city of Troy, but could not get over, under or through the walls that protected it. Finally, Odysseus came up with the idea of a large hollow, wooden horse, that would be filled with Greek soldiers. The people of Troy woke one morning and found that no army surrounded the city, so they thought the enemy had returned to their ships and were finally sailing back to Greece. A great horse had been left This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Skoutelas Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS & ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES THE CARTOGRAPHY OF POWER IN GREEK EPIC: HOMER’S ODYSSEY & THE RECEPTION OF HOMERIC GEOGRAPHIES IN THE HELLENISTIC AND IMPERIAL PERIODS CHARISSA SKOUTELAS SPRING 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Classics & Ancient Mediterranean Studies and Global & International Studies with honors in Classics & Ancient Mediterranean Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Anna Peterson Tombros Early Career Professor of Classical Studies and Assistant Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Thesis Supervisor Erin Hanses Lecturer in Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Honors Adviser * Electronic approvals are on file. i ABSTRACT As modern scholarship has transitioned from analyzing literature in terms of its temporal components towards a focus on narrative spaces, scholars like Alex Purves and Donald Lateiner have applied this framework also to ancient Greek literature. Homer’s Odyssey provides a critical recipient for such inquiry, and Purves has explored the construction of space in the poem with relation to its implications on Greek epic as a genre. This paper seeks to expand upon the spatial discourse on Homer’s Odyssey by pinpointing the modern geographic concept of power, tracing a term inspired by Michael Foucault, or a “cartography of power,” in the poem. In Chapter 2 I employ a narratological approach to examine power dynamics played out over specific spaces of Odysseus’ wanderings, and then on Ithaca, analyzing the intersection of space, power, knowledge, and deception. The second half of this chapter discusses the threshold of Odysseus’ palace and flows of power across spheres of gender and class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of Bomolochia
    The Prehistory of Bomolochia The Greek word bomolochia [βωμολοχία], which is attested first in the context of fifth century B.C.E. comedy and evolved into a general term for buffoonery, reveals in its etymology important tensions in the Greek sacrifice that were already present in very early Greek poetry. Etymologically, bomolochia means “lying in ambush at an altar,” presumably to cadge a portion of meat at a sacrificial banquet. The comic poets’ dramaturgy explains how this term came to mean buffoonery. In Aristophanes’ Birds, for instance, characters repeatedly use buffoonish tactics to wheedle shares of sacrificial meat from Pisthetaerus after he has set up his regime of birds. This comic motif of trying to get shares of sacrificial banquets lasts into New Comedy. The laughter that arises from attempts to get portions at a sacrificial banquet accords with two major theories of laughter: incongruity theory and superiority theory. Superiority theory maintains that laughter is an expression of derisory contempt by a superior towards an inferior (Ruch 2008). When the bomolochos attempts to attain a portion denied to him by his inferior status, superiors laugh at him in derision. Incongruity theory claims that laughter arises when two incongruous interpretive frames for the same phenomena conflict (Ruch 2008). We may laugh when dogs act like a humans because the interpretive frame created in appearance—that they are human—incongruously conflicts with the reality that they are dogs. Detienne, Vernant, and Saīd have established that sacrificial banqueting outlines a social order; it marks people’s social position by excluding them from or including them in sacrificial feasts, and, among those who are included, the portion received marks social rank: better portions indicate better rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey
    Putting an End to Song: Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey Emily Hauser Helios, Volume 47, Number 1, Spring 2020, pp. 39-69 (Article) Published by Texas Tech University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2020.0001 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/765967 [ Access provided at 28 Dec 2020 07:35 GMT from University of Washington @ Seattle ] Putting an End to Song: Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey EMILY HAUSER Abstract Book 1 of the Odyssey presents us with the first bard-figure of the poem, singing what in many ways is an analogue to the Odyssey with “the return of the Greeks”; yet when Penelope appears, it is to attempt to put an end to his song. I use this scene as a starting point to suggest that Penelope is deeply implicated in narrative endings in the Odyssey. Looking at the end or τέλος of the poem through a system- atic study of its “closural allusions,” I argue that a teleological analysis of Penelope’s character in relation to endings may both resolve some of the issues in her inter- pretation thus far, and open up new avenues for the reading of the Odyssey as a poem informed by endings. I. Introduction Penelope’s first appearance in the Odyssey (1.325–144) is to make a request of Phe- mius the bard, who is singing the tale of the Greeks’ return from Troy, the Ἀχαιῶν νόστος (1.326). Phemius’s song of the Greek νόστος (return), of course, mirrors the plot of the Odyssey itself, which has opened only a few hundred lines before with the plea to the Muse to sing of Odysseus and his companions’ return (νόστος, 1.5) from Troy.1 Penelope, however, interrupts the narrative flow and asks the bard to cease singing because of the pain his tale is causing her (1.340–342): ‘ταύτης δ᾽ ἀποπαύε᾽ ἀοιδῆς λυγρῆς, ἥ τέ μοι αἰεὶ ἐνὶ στήθεσσι φίλον κῆρ τείρει .
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Emotions in Modern Receptions of Homeric Epic
    Tales for All Time: The Role of Emotions in Modern Receptions of Homeric Epic Karen Anne Possingham January 2021 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University © Copyright by Karen Anne Possingham 2021 All Rights Reserved 1 This thesis is the original work of the author. Word count: 98,683. 2 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to acknowledge that this research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. My primary supervisor, Elizabeth Minchin, the Best of the Homerists, whose inspiration, support, and dedication helped bring out the best in my work. My secondary supervisors Greta Hawes and Lucy Neave for their sound advice, scholarship and kind encouragement. To my children Nick and Alex, their partners Steph and Tiah, colleagues at ANU and friends for seeing the world through Homer with me for the last four and a half years. Finally, my husband Hugh for his continued patronage of the Arts and for his pithy and witty remarks on the content and progress of this thesis. 3 Abstract The poet we call Homer stands at the intersection of a long oral tradition and the emergence of literacy. The poems associated with his name have exercised a continuing appeal, across time; and yet they can also be unsettling, challenging our ideas of Ancient Greek values and expectations. This has had an impact on the reception of the poems from antiquity to the present day. I have argued in this thesis that, in the cases I have studied, Lorna Hardwick’s idea of ‘faultlines’ in Homeric epic can be adapted to examine the powerful, often contradictory, emotions portrayed in the Iliad and the Odyssey: namely personal and place attachment, grief, and the anger that can lead to acts of retribution or to acts of mercy that rely on the emotion of pity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Faculty Advisor to the Student Writing the Thesis Wishes to Claim Joint Authorship in This Work
    WILLIAMS COLLEGE LIBRARIES Your unpublished thesis, submitted for a degree at Williams College and administered by the Williams College Libraries, will be made available for research use. You may, through this form, provide instructions regarding copyright, access, dissemination and reproduction of your thesis. _ The faculty advisor to the student writing the thesis wishes to claim joint authorship in this work. In each section, please check the ONE statement that reflects your wishes. 1. PUBLICATION AND QUOTATION: LITERARY PROPERTY RIGHTS A student author automatically owns the copyright to his/her work, whether or not a copyright symbol and date are placed on the piece. The duration of U.S. copyright on a manuscript--and Williams theses are considered manuscripts--is the life of the author plus 70 years. _ I/we do not choose to retain literary property rights to the thesis, and I wish to assign them immediately to Williams College. N",vnohllO the in no a s1lldent \,vo.rk: the studerv \VCHIJd} bO\Vevcf) need conLJct the in this case to also per'missir)D to sltilatlOn arose, the Archivcs wou!d be in had _I/we wish to retain literary property rights to the thesis for a period of three years, at which time the literary property rights shall be assigned to Williams College. Selectmg this the amhor a years to make use the in m><:o,mltI2 ,II/we wish to retain literary property rights to the thesis fer~ea of __":Y'88:F&;-Qf­ until my death, whichever is the later, at which time the literary property rights shall be assigned to Williams College.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen of Troy: She Was Not a Dumb Blonde
    HELEN OF TROY A HEROINE IN A MAN’S WORLD! Katerina Ladianou, Classics, OSU Helen is a beautiful woman, some say a Goddess, others say a whore because of her adulterous ways, and she is pursued relentlessly by suitors from all over the ancient world. Homer, Euripides, and Stesichorus all narrate her story, but Homer is the original source in his 2 epic poems, the Iliad and the Odyssey. The fairest woman in the world is Helen, the daughter of the King of Sparta Tyndareos and his wife Leda. Their other daughter Clytemnestra is married to Agamemnon. Such is the fame of the beauty of Helen that every young prince craves to marry her. Superhero Theseus abducts her first, but her brothers Castor and Pollux, [both Argonauts, who sailed to Colchis through the Hellespont with Jason on the Ship Argo to get the Golden Fleece], get her back home. So, when suitors from all over Greece assemble in Sparta to ask for her hand, her father Tyndareos, fearing another abduction makes them take an oath to defend whomever he chooses for her husband, and, moreover, that they collectively would punish anyone who tried to abduct Helen. Then Tyndareos chooses Menelaos and he makes him King of Sparta. In the meantime, Goddess Aphrodite sends an image of Helen to Paris of Troy who at the time is out in the fields shepherding his father’s goats; he falls madly in love with Helen, and the rest is history, for love is the strongest force in the whole world! In the Iliad, Paris, a prince of Troy, a city that has accumulated enormous wealth by controlling the flow of merchant shipping through the nearby Hellespont [in what is now NW Turkey; the Dardanelles], abducts Helen.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and the Female Body in Homer, Vergil, and Ovid
    DEATH AND THE FEMALE BODY IN HOMER, VERGIL, AND OVID Katherine De Boer Simons A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Depart- ment of Classics. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Sharon L. James James J. O’Hara William H. Race Alison Keith Laurel Fulkerson © 2016 Katherine De Boer Simons ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT KATHERINE DE BOER SIMONS: Death and the Female Body in Homer, Vergil, and Ovid (Under the direction of Sharon L. James) This study investigates the treatment of women and death in three major epic poems of the classical world: Homer’s Odyssey, Vergil’s Aeneid, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses. I rely on recent work in the areas of embodiment and media studies to consider dead and dying female bodies as representations of a sexual politics that figures women as threatening and even mon- strous. I argue that the Odyssey initiates a program of linking female death to women’s sexual status and social class that is recapitulated and intensified by Vergil. Both the Odyssey and the Aeneid punish transgressive women with suffering in death, but Vergil further spectacularizes violent female deaths, narrating them in “carnographic” detail. The Metamorphoses, on the other hand, subverts the Homeric and Vergilian model of female sexuality to present the female body as endangered rather than dangerous, and threatened rather than threatening. In Ovid’s poem, women are overwhelmingly depicted as brutalized victims regardless of their sexual status, and the female body is consistently represented as bloodied in death and twisted in metamorphosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses `Dangerous Creatures': Selected children's versions of Homer's Odyssey in English 16992014 RICHARDS, FRANCESCA,MARIA How to cite: RICHARDS, FRANCESCA,MARIA (2016) `Dangerous Creatures': Selected children's versions of Homer's Odyssey in English 16992014 , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11522/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ‘Dangerous Creatures’: Selected children’s versions of Homer’s Odyssey in English 1699–2014 Abstract This thesis considers how the Odyssey was adapted for children, as a specific readership, in English literature 1699-2014. It thus traces both the emergence of children’s literature as a publishing category and the transformation of the Odyssey into a tale of adventure – a perception of the Odyssey which is still widely accepted today (and not only among children) but which is not, for example, how Aristotle understood the poem.
    [Show full text]