DOCSLIB.ORG

Cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Michael Enright,Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Parrott,Approval Services, Environmental Approvals Branch, Operations Divsion, Env

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Michael Enright,Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Parrott,Approval Services, Environmental Approvals Branch, Operations Divsion, Env Page 1 of 1 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 [email protected] [email protected] Jul 14, 2014 Parker S. Dickson (P256) Stantec Consulting 171 Queens London ON N6A 5J7 RE: RE: Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, "Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP", Dated Jul 3, 2014, Filed with MTCS Toronto Office on N/A, MTCS Project Information Form Number P256-0154-2014 Dear Mr. Dickson: The above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18 has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports without technical review.1 Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to send your inquiry to [email protected]. cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Michael Enright,Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Parrott,Approval Services, Environmental Approvals Branch, Operations Divsion, Env. and Climate Change, MOE 1 In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter. Further measures may need to be taken in the event that additional artifacts or archaeological sites are identified or the Report(s) is otherwise found to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP Various Lots and Concessions Geographic Township of Egremont Now Southgate Township Grey County, Ontario Prepared for: Southgate Solar LP 55 Standish Court, 9th Floor Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2 Tel: (905) 542-3535 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 171 Queens Avenue, 6th Floor London, ON N6A 5J7 Tel: (519) 645-2007 Fax: (519) 645-6575 Licensee: Parker Dickson, MA License Number: P256 PIF Number : P256-0154-2014 Project Number: 160940283 FIT Number: N/A ORIGINAL REPORT July 3, 2014 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SOUTHGATE SOLAR PROJECT, SOUTHGATE SOLAR LP Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ III PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. IV 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.1 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 1.2 1.2.1 Post-contact Aboriginal Resources ............................................................ 1.2 1.2.2 Euro-Canadian Resources ........................................................................... 1.3 1.2.3 Recent Reports ............................................................................................... 1.5 1.3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 1.6 1.3.1 The Natural Environment .............................................................................. 1.6 1.3.2 Pre-contact Aboriginal Resources .............................................................. 1.7 1.3.3 Previously Known Archaeological Sites and Surveys ............................... 1.8 1.3.4 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................... 1.10 2.0 FIELD METHODS ............................................................................................................. 2.1 3.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................... 3.1 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 4.1 5.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION........................................................... 5.1 6.0 BIBLOGRAPHY AND SOURCES ..................................................................................... 6.1 7.0 IMAGES .......................................................................................................................... 7.1 7.1 PHOTOS .............................................................................................................................. 7.1 8.0 MAPS ............................................................................................................................. 8.1 9.0 CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................ 9.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Landowner Information from the 1880 Grey County Supplement to the Illustrated Atlas of the Dominion of Canada ........................................................................... 1.5 Table 2 Recent Reports ............................................................................................... 1.5 Table 3 Cultural Chronology for Southgate Township ........................................... 1.8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of Project Area .............................................................................. 8.2 jm l:\01609\active\160940283 - samsung phase iii ontario solar - southgate\work_program\report\final\stage 1\p256-0154-2014_3jul2014_re.docx i STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SOUTHGATE SOLAR PROJECT, SOUTHGATE SOLAR LP Figure 2: Treaties and Purchases (Adapted from Morris 1943) ............................... 8.3 Figure 3: Portion of 1846 Historic Map of Egremont ................................................. 8.4 Figure 4: Portion of 1852 Historic Map of Egremont ................................................. 8.5 Figure 5: Portion of 1880 Historic Map of Egremont ................................................. 8.6 Figure 6: Soil Land Class ................................................................................................ 8.7 Figure 7: Archaeological Potential ............................................................................. 8.8 jm l:\01609\active\160940283 - samsung phase iii ontario solar - southgate\work_program\report\final\stage 1\p256-0154-2014_3jul2014_re.docx ii STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SOUTHGATE SOLAR PROJECT, SOUTHGATE SOLAR LP Executive Summary Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was retained by Dillon Consulting Limited on behalf of Southgate Solar LP to complete a Stage 1 archaeological assessment for the area to be impacted by the Southgate Solar Project. The Project Area comprises a 2,540 hectare parcel of land within an area bounded in the north by Southgate Road 24, Southgate Road 14 to the south, Southgate Sideroad 47 to the east, and Highway 6 to the west in the Geographic Township of Egremont, now Southgate Township, Grey County, Ontario. However, only approximately 1,200 hectares are being considered for the Project Location which is still being defined. The Stage 1 assessment conducted by Stantec was undertaken in order to meet the requirements for an application for a Renewable Energy Approval (Government of Ontario 2011a), as outlined in Ontario Regulation 359/09 sections 21 and 22 under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (Government of Ontario 1990a). The Stage 1 archaeological assessment, involving background research and a property inspection, resulted in the determination that the Project Area exhibits moderate to high potential for the identification and recovery of archaeological resources. The Stage 1 archaeological assessment has determined that a portion of the Hydro One Transmission Line was previously assessed and does not retain archaeological potential. The remainder of the Project Area retains archaeological potential and any areas that will be subject to construction disturbance as a part of the Project Location will be subject to a Stage 2 archaeological assessment prior to construction, unless already documented in previous Stage 2 archaeological assessment reports. The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport is asked to review the results presented and to accept this report into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. Additional archaeological assessment is still required and so the archaeological sites recommended for further archaeological fieldwork remain subject to Section 48(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act and may not be altered, or have artifacts removed, except by a person holding an archaeological license. The Executive Summary highlights key points from the report only; for complete information and findings,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Advisory Committee Agenda
    PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, March 9, 2021 | 5:00 pm ZOOM MEETING – PUBLIC ACCESS WEBSITE Virtual Meeting via Zoom https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85006353813 MEMBERS PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST DELEGATIONS: DISCUSSIONS & DECISIONS 1. Adoption of February 9th, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes 2. Business arising from Minutes 3. Saugeen Cedar Heights West Subdivision 4. Official Plan Amendment LOPA#3 --------------Town of Hanover (Public Meeting March 15, 2021 at 7pm) 5. Proposed Site Plan ----------------------------------former JDSS 6. Proposed Site Plan ----------------------------------Hoffman, John / Frey, Eric 7. Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. Z1-21 ----------Town of Hanover (Housekeeping) 8. Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. Z2-21 ----------2501563 Ontario Inc. c/o Davidson, Ron 9. Minor Variance Application No. Z1-21 ----------Mills, Ian & Theresa Planning Report YES NO 10. Parkside (former Gath) Subdivision Parkland 11. New Business 12. Adjournment Next Meeting Date: April 13, 2021 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES Tuesday, February 9, 2021 | 5:00pm Virtual Meeting via Zoom MEMBERS PRESENT Chair Tim Norwood | Vice Chair Mark Ebert | Harold Fleet | | Peter Hambly | Keith Hopkins MEMBERS ABSENT Terry Leis OTHERS PRESENT Mayor Sue Paterson | Brandon Koebel, Councillor | Dave Hocking, Councillor | Sibghat Ullah | Nitin Malhotra | Abu Ziauddin | Ramyar Mehraban | John Hoffman | Eric Frey |Don Tedford, Secretary- Treasurer | Brenda Goetz, Deputy Secretary-Treasurer | Brian Tocheri, CAO/Clerk | April Marshall, Economic Development Manager DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Nil DELEGATIONS Sibghat Ullah | Nitin Malhotra | Abu Ziauddin | Ramyar Mehraban | John Hoffman | Eric Frey Chair Tim Norwood welcomed Peter Hambly as a new member to the Committee. Tim further thanked Bruce Sickel for his years of service. 1. Adoption of December 15th, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes Moved by HAROLD FLEET / Seconded by KEITH HOPKINS THAT the minutes of the December 15th, 2020 regular meeting be approved as printed and circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP Various Lots and Concessions Geographic Township of Egremont Now Southgate Township Grey County, Ontario Prepared for: Southgate Solar LP 55 Standish Court, 9th Floor Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2 Tel: (905) 542-3535 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 171 Queens Avenue, 6th Floor London, ON N6A 5J7 Tel: (519) 645-2007 Fax: (519) 645-6575 Licensee: Parker Dickson, MA License Number: P256 PIF Number : P256-0154-2014 Project Number: 160940283 FIT Number: N/A ORIGINAL REPORT July 3, 2014 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SOUTHGATE SOLAR PROJECT, SOUTHGATE SOLAR LP Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ III PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. IV 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.1 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area
    Approved Chapter 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Approved Assessment Report -- Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Approved Assessment Report -- Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.0 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Source Protection Region .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area ...................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.1 Conservation Authorities ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Municipalities .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.3 Provincial Ministries ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1.4 Federal Government ................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1.5 First Nations ............................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations
    [Show full text]
  • The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed
    CONSERVATION Beatty Saugeen River WATERSHED REPORT CARD 2008 A WATERSHED REPORT CARD is a document which outlines the general state of forest, wetland, surface water and groundwater Average Grades resources of a particular river and its watershed. Data for this Report Card cover a five year period from 2002 - 2006. B Forest Conditions D Wetland Conditions B+ Surface Water Quality N/A Groundwater Quality The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed The Beatty Saugeen River is a tributary of the Main What is a Watershed? Saugeen River draining A watershed is an area of land that drains into a river approximately 274 square kilometres. The river system is or stream. The boundary of a watershed is based on 46 kilometres in length with an elevation or the natural contours of the land. average gradient of 4.5 metres per kilometre. The main GRADE DESCRIPTION source of the Beatty Saugeen A = Excellent ecosystem conditions. Some protection and River is found in the eastern enhancement may be required. rural wooded wetlands of the B = Good ecosystem conditions. Some areas may require Municipality of Southgate enhancement and/or improvements. C = Ecosystem conditions that warrant general improvements. (former Egremont Township). D = Poor ecosystem conditions. Overall improvements necessary. The system drains into the F = Degraded ecosystem. Conditions in need of considerable South Saugeen River improvement. immediately west of Hanover. The headwaters area is located almost entirely in the Dundalk Till Plain. In spite of the elevation of this area, drainage is slow, Report Card Notes: The observed conditions in this watershed resulting in swamps, bogs and poorly drained depressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Meeting a G E N
    SAUGEEN VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUTHORITY MEETING Thursday August 6, 2020 1:00 p.m. Electronic A G E N D A 1. Adoption of Agenda 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 3. Approval of Minutes a. Authority Meeting – June 4, 2020 – attached 4. Matters Arising from the Minutes a. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Response Update – Jennifer Stephens – attached b. Section 28 Violations Report – Erik Downing – attached 5. Consent Agenda a. Finance Report – attached b. Program Report – attached c. Executive Committee Minutes – July 16, 2020 – attached d. Correspondence for Members’ information – attached e. News Articles for Members’ information – attached 6. New Business a. Creation of SVCA Strategic Action Plan – Jennifer Stephens – attached b. Environmental Planning & Regulations Department Status – Erik Downing – attached c. Administrative By-law Amendments – Janice Hagan – attached d. Nuclear Waste Management Organization - Jennifer Stephens – attached e. Compensation for Seasonal Campers – Donna Lacey – attached 7. In Camera Session Adjournment AGENDA SAUGEEN VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Conservation through Cooperation MINUTES MEETING: Authority Meeting DATE: Thursday June 4, 2020 TIME: 1:00 p.m. LOCATION: Electronic CHAIR: Dan Gieruszak MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Allen, Maureen Couture, Barbara Dobreen, Mark Goetz, Cheryl Grace, Tom Hutchinson, Steve McCabe, Don Murray, Mike Myatt, Sue Paterson, Diana Rae, Christine Robinson, Bill Stewart ABSENT WITH REGRETS: Mark Davis OTHERS PRESENT: Wayne Bell, Delegate Dick Hibma, Interim General Manager/Secretary-Treasurer Jennifer Stephens, General Manager/Secretary Treasurer Laura Molson, Manager, Accounting Erik Downing, Manager, Environmental Planning & Regulations Shannon Wood, Manager, Communications JoAnne Harbinson, Manager, Water Resources & Stewardship Services Donna Lacey, Forestry Coordinator Shaun Anthony, Flood Warning/Water Quality Coordinator Alyssa Gowing, Regulations Officer Janice Hagan, Administrative Assistant/Recording Secretary Chair Dan Gieruszak, called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Southern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 1) THE HYDROGEOLOGY OF SOUTHERN ONTARIO SECOND EDITION By S.N. SINGER, C.K. CHENG, AND M.G. SCAFE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2003 ii PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION The second edition of The Hydrogeology of Southern Ontario provides an opportunity to make changes and additions in light of new data and studies made since 1995. The text in this edition has been extensively revised, new maps have been added, statistics related to groundwater quality have been revised, and the description of the Provincial Drinking Water Standards and Objectives has been brought up to date. A new chapter on overburden aquifers has been added. The chapter describes 164 overburden aquifers within southern Ontario in terms of location, type (confined or unconfined), composition, thickness, elevation, depths to static water levels, and well yields. Toronto, April 2003 DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. iii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION This report describes the hydrogeology of southern Ontario in terms of the hydraulic parameters of various bedrock and overburden units, and the geologic conditions under which groundwater flow systems operate. In addition, the report provides an assessment of the long-term groundwater recharge and discharge, and an evaluation of groundwater quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Final DRAFT Conceptual Water Budget 1.0 Conceptual Water Budget
    Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula Source Protection Region FINAL DRAFT Conceptual Water Budget Table of Contents 1.0 Conceptual Water Budget 1.1 Introduction ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 1 1.1.1 Goals and Anticipated Use of the Water Budget ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 1 1.1.2 Definition of Uniform Areas ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2 Surface Water System ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2.1 Introduction ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2.2 Background ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 3 1.2.3 Climate ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 4 1.2.3.1 Precipitation ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 4 1.2.3.2 Air Temperature ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 6 1.2.3.3 Wind ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 7 1.2.3.4 Barometric Pressure ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 7 1.2.3.5 Solar Radiation ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 8 1.2.3.6 Evaporation and Transpiration ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
    [Show full text]
  • Beatty Saugeen River Subwatershed
    CONSERVATION 2007-2011 Beatty Saugeen River Watershed R E P O R T C A R D A report on the general condition of the Beatty Saugeen River Watershed 2013 Watershed Perspective The Beatty Saugeen River is a tributary of the Main Saugeen River draining approximately 274 ES square kilometres. The river system is 46 kilometres in length with an average gradient of 4.5 E GRAD ERAG metres per kilometre. The main source of the Beatty Saugeen River is found in the eastern rural AV ditions est Con wooded wetlands of the Township of Southgate (former Egremont Township). The system drains For ns B onditio into the South Saugeen River immediately west of Hanover, Township of Southgate. land C Wet ality A ter Qu ce Wa The headwaters area is located almost entirely in the Dundalk Till Plain. In spite of the elevation of Surfa lity r Qua this area, drainage is slow, resulting in swamps, bogs and poorly drained depressions. The B dwate AGroun remainder of the watershed is located within both the Horseshoe Moraine and the Teeswater Ni Drumlin Field. Forest Conditions With an average grade of 'B' for forest conditions, the Beatty Saugeen River Watershed meets the Environment Canada guidelines of 30% forest cover. Both forest cover and riparian cover scored a 'B' grade. The recommendation is that 50% of the 30 metre wide riparian zone should have forest cover. The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed has 47.7% of the riparian zone forested. The grade for forest interior was a 'C' which remains the same as the last report card.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Water Quantity Stress Assessment
    Approved Chapter 3 WATER QUANTITY STRESS ASSESSMENT APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 3.0 WATER QUANTITY STRESS ASSESSMENT 3.0 Water Quantity Stress Assessment ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Summary of Conceptual Water Budget Results ........................................................ 3-1 3.2 Description of Region .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Climate of the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area ...................................... 3-1 3.2.1.1 Precipitation ............................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.1.2 Air Temperature ..................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.1.3 Evaporation and Transpiration ............................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Land Use and Land Cover..................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.3 Soils .................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.3 Runoff and Streamflow
    [Show full text]
  • County of Grey Bridge No. 900-272 Orchardville Schedule 'B' EA
    Prepared By: County of Grey Bridge No. 900-272 Orchardville Schedule 'B' EA Project File (Version 1) GMBP File: 217103 September 12, 2019 GUELPH | OWEN SOUND | LISTOWEL | KITCHENER | LONDON | HAMILTON | GTA 1260-2ND AVE. E., UNIT 1, OWEN SOUND ON N4K 2J3 P: 519-376-1805 WWW.GMBLUEPLAN.CA BRIDGE NO. 900-272 ORCHARDVILLE SCHEDULE 'B' EA PROJECT FILE (VERSION 1) GMBP FILE: 217103 SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PLANNING PROCESS .................................................. 2 3. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Bridge Structure and Design ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Site Surroundings ................................................................................................................................................. 5 4. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 5 5. BACKGROUND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Social Environment .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]