Beatty Saugeen River Subwatershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beatty Saugeen River Subwatershed CONSERVATION 2007-2011 Beatty Saugeen River Watershed R E P O R T C A R D A report on the general condition of the Beatty Saugeen River Watershed 2013 Watershed Perspective The Beatty Saugeen River is a tributary of the Main Saugeen River draining approximately 274 ES square kilometres. The river system is 46 kilometres in length with an average gradient of 4.5 E GRAD ERAG metres per kilometre. The main source of the Beatty Saugeen River is found in the eastern rural AV ditions est Con wooded wetlands of the Township of Southgate (former Egremont Township). The system drains For ns B onditio into the South Saugeen River immediately west of Hanover, Township of Southgate. land C Wet ality A ter Qu ce Wa The headwaters area is located almost entirely in the Dundalk Till Plain. In spite of the elevation of Surfa lity r Qua this area, drainage is slow, resulting in swamps, bogs and poorly drained depressions. The B dwate AGroun remainder of the watershed is located within both the Horseshoe Moraine and the Teeswater Ni Drumlin Field. Forest Conditions With an average grade of 'B' for forest conditions, the Beatty Saugeen River Watershed meets the Environment Canada guidelines of 30% forest cover. Both forest cover and riparian cover scored a 'B' grade. The recommendation is that 50% of the 30 metre wide riparian zone should have forest cover. The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed has 47.7% of the riparian zone forested. The grade for forest interior was a 'C' which remains the same as the last report card. Environment Canada recommends at least 10% forest interior to sustain plant and animal species. This watershed had only 6.7% of its area as forest interior. Forest patch size should be increased to meet this target. From 2007-2011 there were 11,380 trees planted in this watershed through the Grey Bruce Forestry Service. Additional tree planting should be considered to ensure Wetland Conditions the forest conditions are improved or at a minimum, maintained. This report card summarizes the conditions of both 'evaluated' and 'unevaluated' wetlands. Since the last set of report cards summarized only the 'evaluated' wetlands the present results cannot be compared to the previous report card. When considering the presence of all wetlands, the Beatty Saugeen River Watershed scores an 'A' grade with 23% wetland cover. Care should be taken to protect and maintain existing wetlands. Surface Water Quality The Beatty Saugeen River scores an average grade of 'B' for surface water quality. When comparing scores using the new grading system, the overall grade is the same as on the last report card. The average total phosphorus concentration falls below the provincial water quality objective of 0.03 mg/L. E. coli is below the recreational guidelines of 100 CFU/100mL but counts do increase after storm events. The grades for total phosphorus and E. coli stayed the same but the grade for the benthic invertebrates went down from a 'B' to a 'C' grade. Changes in the benthic invertebrate community are seen as early indicators of deterioration in water quality, therefore, efforts must continue to encourage landowners and the agricultural community to preserve and enhance natural land cover. Current stressors such as climate change and invasive species could pose significant threats in this watershed, therefore, efforts should be made to address these stressors to maintain or improve the current scores. Groundwater Quality GRADE DESCRIPTION There are no monitoring wells located within this watershed, A = Excellent ecosystem conditions. Some protection and however, it should be noted that groundwater aquifers do not enhancement may be required. conform to watershed boundaries but rather flow in an east to west B = Good ecosystem conditions. Some areas may require direction through the watershed. Other monitoring wells in the enhancement and/or improvements. area have excellent water quality. Different types of aquifers exist C = Ecosystem conditions that warrant general improvements. D = Poor ecosystem conditions. Overall improvements necessary. throughout the region and the quality of individual wells on private F = Degraded ecosystem. Conditions in need of considerable property may vary from that of the provincial monitoring wells. improvement. Beatty Saugeen River Watershed 2002-2006 2007-2011 2007-2011 Trend Indicators Indicator Description % of AREA % of AREA Grade * * Forest cover is the percentage of the watershed that is forested or wooded. Environment Forest Cover 31.4 31.8 B Canada suggests that 30% forest cover is the minimum needed to support healthy wildlife habitat. Forest interior refers to the protected core area found inside a woodlot. It is the sheltered, secluded environment away from forest edges and open habitats. Environment Canada recommends s Forest Interior n 7.1 6.7 C o that a minimum of 10% of a watershed should be interior forest cover to sustain plant i t i and animal species. d n o C Riparian Cover is the percentage of forested habitat along a given waterway. Environment t s Canada guidelines suggest that at least 75% of stream length should have 30 metre e r Riparian Cover ** naturally vegetated buffers. Forested vegetation represents about two-thirds with the o 47.7 B F rest being marsh, meadow, and shrub thicket. The equivalent target is 50% of the riparian zone in forest cover. Average Grade B B Grade B indicates good ecosystem conditions. Some areas may require enhancement. Wetland cover is the percentage of existing wetland in a watershed. Environment Canada s Wetland Cover n ** 23 d A suggests that 10% wetland cover is the minimum needed for a healthy watershed. o n i t a i l t d e n W o Grade A indicates excellent ecosystem conditions and protection may be required. Some areas Average Grade C - A may require enhancement to maintain this level of quality. 2002-2006 2007-2011 2007-2011 Trend Indicators Indicator Description Result Result Grade * * Benthos or benthic macroinvertebrates are large bottom dwelling insects, crustaceans, worms, mollusks, and related aquatic animals that live in watercourses. They are good indicators of water Benthic quality, responding quickly to environmental stressors such as pollutants. The Modified Family Invertebrates 4.08 5.35 C Biotic Index (FBI) using New York State tolerance values provide stream health y information and values range from 1 (healthy) to 10 (degraded). t i l a Total phosphorus is indicative of nutrient levels within a watercourse. Phosphorus is required for u Q the growth of aquatic plants and algae, however, concentrations above the Provincial Water Quality r Total Phosphorus 0.013 0.015 e t (mg/L) A Objective may result in unhealthy stream conditions. The Provincial Water Quality Objective a (mg/L) W is 0.03 mg/L. e c a f 68 78 E. coli originate from the wastes of warm blooded animal, including humans, livestock, wildlife, pets r u E. coli (CFU/ (CFU/ and waterfowl. The Ontario Recreational Water Quality Guidelines suggest that waters S B 100 mL) 100 mL) with less than 100 CFUs/100mL are safe for swimming. Average Grade B B Grade B indicates good ecosystem conditions. Some areas may require enhancement. Nitrates are present in water as a result of decay of plant or animal material, the use of fertilizers, y Nitrite + Nitrate domestic sewage or treated wastewater, as well as geological formations containing soluble t N/A N/A i N/A l a nitrogen compounds. The Ontario Drinking Water Standard for nitrite + nitrate is 10 mg/L. u Q r While chloride can be naturally occurring, the presence of elevated chloride may indicate e t a Chloride N/A N/A N/A contamination from road salt, industrial discharges, or landfill leachate. The Ontario Drinking w d Water Standard for chloride is only for aesthetic purposes with an objective of 250 mg/L. n u o r There are no monitoring wells located within this watershed, however, other monitoring wells in the G Average Grade N/A N/A vicinity have good water quality achieving an A grade. * For the 2007-2011 report cards the grading system has changed. Surface water data used for this interpretation were obtained through To be able to compare the results, the scores from the 2002-2006 the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN), the report cards were included. The new grading system was applied to Ontario Benthos Biomonitoring Network (OBBN) and Saugeen these former scores and it was then determined whether the grades Conservation's Water Quality Monitoring Network. have stayed the same , improved , or declined . Groundwater data A general determination of water quality in the ** The data was calculated differently for the previous set of report area can be made by looking at other wells in the vicinity. cards so it is not possible to compare to the 2007-2011 data. Beatty Saugeen River Watershed General Information Area Dams Groundwater Aquifer Sources 274 sq. km In total there are 24 dams in the watershed, of Salina Formation, Guelph Formation which 10 are considered large dams (greater than 3 metres in height). Municipalities Stream Flow (mean) Municipality of West Grey, Township of Mean annual flow - 6.0 cubic metres per Southgate, Town of Hanover Sewage Treatment Facilities second (cms) None Physiography Stream Flow (low) * 39% till plain (drumlinized), 34% spillway, Woodlot Size 7Q10 flow1 - 0.51 cms 7Q20 flow2 - 0.4 cms 22% kame moraine, 2% peat and muck, 1% Some large forest areas exist providing drumlin, 1% till moraine, 1% esker interior habitat as well as many interconnected smaller forests. Rare Species (obtained from the National Soils Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) 41% medium to moderately fine loam, 30% Land Use Website) silty loam, 14% organic material, 9% fine to 65% agriculture; 32% forested; 0.2% urban Redside Dace, Clamp-tipped Emerald, moderately coarse sandy loam, 5% other (may Forcipate Emerald, Massasauga Rattlesnake, include small percentages of alluvium, Scarlet Beebalm breypan, bottomlands etc), 2% coarse sandy Areas of Natural and Scientific loam and loamy sand Interest (ANSI) - none * 1 7Q10 - the lowest mean flow for seven consecutive days that has a 10-year recurrence interval period, or a 1 in 10 chance of occurring in any one year.
Recommended publications
  • Cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Michael Enright,Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Parrott,Approval Services, Environmental Approvals Branch, Operations Divsion, Env
    Page 1 of 1 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 [email protected] [email protected] Jul 14, 2014 Parker S. Dickson (P256) Stantec Consulting 171 Queens London ON N6A 5J7 RE: RE: Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, "Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP", Dated Jul 3, 2014, Filed with MTCS Toronto Office on N/A, MTCS Project Information Form Number P256-0154-2014 Dear Mr. Dickson: The above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18 has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports without technical review.1 Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to send your inquiry to [email protected]. cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Michael Enright,Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Parrott,Approval Services, Environmental Approvals Branch, Operations Divsion, Env. and Climate Change, MOE 1 In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Advisory Committee Agenda
    PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, March 9, 2021 | 5:00 pm ZOOM MEETING – PUBLIC ACCESS WEBSITE Virtual Meeting via Zoom https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85006353813 MEMBERS PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST DELEGATIONS: DISCUSSIONS & DECISIONS 1. Adoption of February 9th, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes 2. Business arising from Minutes 3. Saugeen Cedar Heights West Subdivision 4. Official Plan Amendment LOPA#3 --------------Town of Hanover (Public Meeting March 15, 2021 at 7pm) 5. Proposed Site Plan ----------------------------------former JDSS 6. Proposed Site Plan ----------------------------------Hoffman, John / Frey, Eric 7. Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. Z1-21 ----------Town of Hanover (Housekeeping) 8. Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. Z2-21 ----------2501563 Ontario Inc. c/o Davidson, Ron 9. Minor Variance Application No. Z1-21 ----------Mills, Ian & Theresa Planning Report YES NO 10. Parkside (former Gath) Subdivision Parkland 11. New Business 12. Adjournment Next Meeting Date: April 13, 2021 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES Tuesday, February 9, 2021 | 5:00pm Virtual Meeting via Zoom MEMBERS PRESENT Chair Tim Norwood | Vice Chair Mark Ebert | Harold Fleet | | Peter Hambly | Keith Hopkins MEMBERS ABSENT Terry Leis OTHERS PRESENT Mayor Sue Paterson | Brandon Koebel, Councillor | Dave Hocking, Councillor | Sibghat Ullah | Nitin Malhotra | Abu Ziauddin | Ramyar Mehraban | John Hoffman | Eric Frey |Don Tedford, Secretary- Treasurer | Brenda Goetz, Deputy Secretary-Treasurer | Brian Tocheri, CAO/Clerk | April Marshall, Economic Development Manager DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Nil DELEGATIONS Sibghat Ullah | Nitin Malhotra | Abu Ziauddin | Ramyar Mehraban | John Hoffman | Eric Frey Chair Tim Norwood welcomed Peter Hambly as a new member to the Committee. Tim further thanked Bruce Sickel for his years of service. 1. Adoption of December 15th, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes Moved by HAROLD FLEET / Seconded by KEITH HOPKINS THAT the minutes of the December 15th, 2020 regular meeting be approved as printed and circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Southgate Solar Project, Southgate Solar LP Various Lots and Concessions Geographic Township of Egremont Now Southgate Township Grey County, Ontario Prepared for: Southgate Solar LP 55 Standish Court, 9th Floor Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2 Tel: (905) 542-3535 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 171 Queens Avenue, 6th Floor London, ON N6A 5J7 Tel: (519) 645-2007 Fax: (519) 645-6575 Licensee: Parker Dickson, MA License Number: P256 PIF Number : P256-0154-2014 Project Number: 160940283 FIT Number: N/A ORIGINAL REPORT July 3, 2014 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SOUTHGATE SOLAR PROJECT, SOUTHGATE SOLAR LP Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ III PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. IV 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.1 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area
    Approved Chapter 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Approved Assessment Report -- Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Approved Assessment Report -- Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.0 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Source Protection Region .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area ...................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.1 Conservation Authorities ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Municipalities .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.3 Provincial Ministries ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1.4 Federal Government ................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1.5 First Nations ............................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations
    [Show full text]
  • The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed
    CONSERVATION Beatty Saugeen River WATERSHED REPORT CARD 2008 A WATERSHED REPORT CARD is a document which outlines the general state of forest, wetland, surface water and groundwater Average Grades resources of a particular river and its watershed. Data for this Report Card cover a five year period from 2002 - 2006. B Forest Conditions D Wetland Conditions B+ Surface Water Quality N/A Groundwater Quality The Beatty Saugeen River Watershed The Beatty Saugeen River is a tributary of the Main What is a Watershed? Saugeen River draining A watershed is an area of land that drains into a river approximately 274 square kilometres. The river system is or stream. The boundary of a watershed is based on 46 kilometres in length with an elevation or the natural contours of the land. average gradient of 4.5 metres per kilometre. The main GRADE DESCRIPTION source of the Beatty Saugeen A = Excellent ecosystem conditions. Some protection and River is found in the eastern enhancement may be required. rural wooded wetlands of the B = Good ecosystem conditions. Some areas may require Municipality of Southgate enhancement and/or improvements. C = Ecosystem conditions that warrant general improvements. (former Egremont Township). D = Poor ecosystem conditions. Overall improvements necessary. The system drains into the F = Degraded ecosystem. Conditions in need of considerable South Saugeen River improvement. immediately west of Hanover. The headwaters area is located almost entirely in the Dundalk Till Plain. In spite of the elevation of this area, drainage is slow, Report Card Notes: The observed conditions in this watershed resulting in swamps, bogs and poorly drained depressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Meeting a G E N
    SAUGEEN VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUTHORITY MEETING Thursday August 6, 2020 1:00 p.m. Electronic A G E N D A 1. Adoption of Agenda 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 3. Approval of Minutes a. Authority Meeting – June 4, 2020 – attached 4. Matters Arising from the Minutes a. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Response Update – Jennifer Stephens – attached b. Section 28 Violations Report – Erik Downing – attached 5. Consent Agenda a. Finance Report – attached b. Program Report – attached c. Executive Committee Minutes – July 16, 2020 – attached d. Correspondence for Members’ information – attached e. News Articles for Members’ information – attached 6. New Business a. Creation of SVCA Strategic Action Plan – Jennifer Stephens – attached b. Environmental Planning & Regulations Department Status – Erik Downing – attached c. Administrative By-law Amendments – Janice Hagan – attached d. Nuclear Waste Management Organization - Jennifer Stephens – attached e. Compensation for Seasonal Campers – Donna Lacey – attached 7. In Camera Session Adjournment AGENDA SAUGEEN VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Conservation through Cooperation MINUTES MEETING: Authority Meeting DATE: Thursday June 4, 2020 TIME: 1:00 p.m. LOCATION: Electronic CHAIR: Dan Gieruszak MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Allen, Maureen Couture, Barbara Dobreen, Mark Goetz, Cheryl Grace, Tom Hutchinson, Steve McCabe, Don Murray, Mike Myatt, Sue Paterson, Diana Rae, Christine Robinson, Bill Stewart ABSENT WITH REGRETS: Mark Davis OTHERS PRESENT: Wayne Bell, Delegate Dick Hibma, Interim General Manager/Secretary-Treasurer Jennifer Stephens, General Manager/Secretary Treasurer Laura Molson, Manager, Accounting Erik Downing, Manager, Environmental Planning & Regulations Shannon Wood, Manager, Communications JoAnne Harbinson, Manager, Water Resources & Stewardship Services Donna Lacey, Forestry Coordinator Shaun Anthony, Flood Warning/Water Quality Coordinator Alyssa Gowing, Regulations Officer Janice Hagan, Administrative Assistant/Recording Secretary Chair Dan Gieruszak, called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Southern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 1) THE HYDROGEOLOGY OF SOUTHERN ONTARIO SECOND EDITION By S.N. SINGER, C.K. CHENG, AND M.G. SCAFE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2003 ii PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION The second edition of The Hydrogeology of Southern Ontario provides an opportunity to make changes and additions in light of new data and studies made since 1995. The text in this edition has been extensively revised, new maps have been added, statistics related to groundwater quality have been revised, and the description of the Provincial Drinking Water Standards and Objectives has been brought up to date. A new chapter on overburden aquifers has been added. The chapter describes 164 overburden aquifers within southern Ontario in terms of location, type (confined or unconfined), composition, thickness, elevation, depths to static water levels, and well yields. Toronto, April 2003 DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. iii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION This report describes the hydrogeology of southern Ontario in terms of the hydraulic parameters of various bedrock and overburden units, and the geologic conditions under which groundwater flow systems operate. In addition, the report provides an assessment of the long-term groundwater recharge and discharge, and an evaluation of groundwater quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Final DRAFT Conceptual Water Budget 1.0 Conceptual Water Budget
    Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula Source Protection Region FINAL DRAFT Conceptual Water Budget Table of Contents 1.0 Conceptual Water Budget 1.1 Introduction ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 1 1.1.1 Goals and Anticipated Use of the Water Budget ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 1 1.1.2 Definition of Uniform Areas ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2 Surface Water System ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2.1 Introduction ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 2 1.2.2 Background ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 3 1.2.3 Climate ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 4 1.2.3.1 Precipitation ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 4 1.2.3.2 Air Temperature ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 6 1.2.3.3 Wind ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 7 1.2.3.4 Barometric Pressure ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 7 1.2.3.5 Solar Radiation ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 8 1.2.3.6 Evaporation and Transpiration ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Water Quantity Stress Assessment
    Approved Chapter 3 WATER QUANTITY STRESS ASSESSMENT APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 3.0 WATER QUANTITY STRESS ASSESSMENT 3.0 Water Quantity Stress Assessment ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Summary of Conceptual Water Budget Results ........................................................ 3-1 3.2 Description of Region .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Climate of the Saugeen Valley Source Protection Area ...................................... 3-1 3.2.1.1 Precipitation ............................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.1.2 Air Temperature ..................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.1.3 Evaporation and Transpiration ............................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Land Use and Land Cover..................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.3 Soils .................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.3 Runoff and Streamflow
    [Show full text]
  • County of Grey Bridge No. 900-272 Orchardville Schedule 'B' EA
    Prepared By: County of Grey Bridge No. 900-272 Orchardville Schedule 'B' EA Project File (Version 1) GMBP File: 217103 September 12, 2019 GUELPH | OWEN SOUND | LISTOWEL | KITCHENER | LONDON | HAMILTON | GTA 1260-2ND AVE. E., UNIT 1, OWEN SOUND ON N4K 2J3 P: 519-376-1805 WWW.GMBLUEPLAN.CA BRIDGE NO. 900-272 ORCHARDVILLE SCHEDULE 'B' EA PROJECT FILE (VERSION 1) GMBP FILE: 217103 SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PLANNING PROCESS .................................................. 2 3. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Bridge Structure and Design ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Site Surroundings ................................................................................................................................................. 5 4. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 5 5. BACKGROUND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Social Environment .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]