PROMISES, PROMISES Can Obama Redeem His Environmental Failures? by Mark Hertsgaard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PROMISES, PROMISES Can Obama Redeem His Environmental Failures? by Mark Hertsgaard R E P 0 R T PROMISES, PROMISES Can Obama redeem his environmental failures? By Mark Hertsgaard John Pod~stii\li.£"b~gllh advising was a top concern for· Podesta~and, of staff had steered Bill Clinton's pres~ , Barack Obama in die, summer of it seemed, for Obama himself. In July, idency through the impeachment cri~ 2008, when the junior senator's im~ a group of experts informally repre~ sis, soon became Obama's · transition pr~bable rise from mixed;.race son of a senting the Democratic candidate manager, helping him identify andvet single mother to president ofthe traveled to Beijing for confidential prospective Cabinet members and United States .was acquiring a ,giddy talks with Chinese officials, hoping to other high~ranking officials. "I fought sense of inevitability. Climate change foster a new era of climate coopera~ very hard to create a separate office [in Mark Hertsgaard is the author of six books, tion after eight years of obstruction on the White House] for climate and en~ including, most recently, Hot: Living the part of the Bush Administration. ergy," Podesta told me. And the person Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth. Podesta, who as White House chief initially chosen to run that office-the Bubbles of air trapped in snowstorms 5,000 to" 10,000 years ago emerge from an ice sheet melting as deposits of soot and small rock particles, or cryoconite, 28 HARPER'S MAGAZINE/ JULY 2014 increase heat absorption© James Balog/Aurora Photos .~, ,_!it$214 M a an ma u: z.z ewe former EPA administrator Carol began serving as White House coun~ voters under age thirty~five, regardless Browner-was, in Podesta's opinion, sel. Since then, the president seems to of party affiliation. There was the po~ "extraordinarily well qualified." have begun tackling the issue with re~ etry of Obama pledging, on the night But when I interviewed Podesta last newed vigor. In his 2014 State of the he clinched the Democratic Party's November, he did not pretend that Union address, he framed it as a mor~ nomination, that this would be re~ Obama's climate record as president al imperative, pledging to "do every~ membered ·as "the moment when the had been satisfactory. Seated at his thing we could" to leave our grand~ rise of the oceans began to slow." kitchen table in Washington, D.C., children "a safe, stable climate." And More pragmatically, there was his en~ Podesta was dressed in running clothes; in June, the EPA is scheduled to, an~ dorsement of tough, ambitious poli~ at age .sixty.,.five, he still competes in nounce what may be among Obama's des, including making polluters pay marathons. I began by asking, "How furthest-reaching initiatives: new reg~ for the right to emit carbon and cut­ will history judge President Obama on ulations on the greenhouse gases ting greenhouse.-gas emissions by climate change, if history is still being emitted by the nation's 1,500 power 80 percent by 2050. writnen fifty years from now?" plants, historically the largest source When Obama took the stage in Obama will be viewed as someone of U.S. carbon pollution. Chicago, flashing that incandescent "who tried to address the challenge," But Podesta ~eemed to realize, if smile and flanked by his wife and replied Podesta. He was willing to take only privately, that Obama had a long daughters, he did not disappoint his risks and expend political capital on way to go on climate change. In No~ young supporters. ''A planet in peril," the issue-a rare and commendable vember, the once and future presiden~ he announced, would be one of his thing. "But fifty years from now, is that tial aide told me that Obama would top three priorities. This was a first. going to seem like enough? I think the likely go down in history as someone By implicitly giving climate change answer to that is going to be no." "who couldn't break through contem~ equal. status with the economic melt­ Of course, the president faced bitter porary politics to the place· down and the wars in Afghanistan opposition from the Republicans. But we need to go."1 and Iraq, Obama was elevating it to a Podesta believed that some of Obama's level of importance no previous top aides shared the blame for his 0 bama's record on climate U.S. president had granted. lackluster record. "There were people change is important not only for the So why, aside from the demands of inside the White House in the first obvious reason that everyone on the financial crisis, did he change two years who were not there" on earth requires a livable planet, but course so completely? For many of his climate change, he said. Their attitude also because his approach to the eli~ supporters, it's something of a/ puzzle. was dismissive at best: "Yeah, fine, mate issue reflects a great deal about "It was as if the issue evaporated into fine, fine, but it's ninth on our list of his presidency as a whole. As much as thin air," said Lee Wasserman, the di~ eight really important problems." his handling of the economy, health . rector of the Rockefeller Family Fund. "You headed his transition team," I care, or foreign policy, it illuminates To be sure, Obama took sorri.e im~ pointed out. "Do you feel any tespon~ both his early promise and his subse~ portant steps to combat climate change sibility for helping select those people?" quent shortfalls; both the victories once he was elected. He included an "Which people?'' won and the defeats suffered, the unprecedented $80 billion for clean I mentioned that Rahm Emanuel, blunders committed and the mysteries energy in the American Recovery and the White House chief of staff during begging explanation. Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the stim~ Obama's first two years in office, was As I rushed to Grant Park to cover ~Ius bill that passed a month after he frequently accused of being climate Obama's victory speech in 2008, I took office. The legislation was primar~ non~enthusiast number one. Law~ saw group after group of people in ily viewed as a life preserver for a foun~ renee Summers, the president's chief their twenties streaming through the dering economy, but as the journalist economic adviser, was criticized in streets of Chicago, their faces flushed Michael Grunwald writes in The New similar terms. with elation, chanting, "Yes we did!" New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change Podesta stared at me in silence, It was the young, after all, who were in the Obama Era (2012), it was also then he asked if we might speak off largely responsible for his victory. "the biggest and most transformative the record. We did. When we re~ They made up the bulk of the volun~ energy bill in U.S. history." turned, he limited himself to noting teer army that did so much-from "We'll look back and say, 'That was that decisions about the economic raising record amounts of money on~ a turning point,'" Carol Browner told team and its policies were "made by line to registering more than 800,000 me. Renewable~energy executives and the president, and they were not new voters-to give the nation its analysts agree. ARR~s ample invest­ made :around the question of climate first African~American president. ment in green technologies lowered change. We were in the middle of a And they did so in no small part production costs and market barriers, fiscal crisis." becal).se of what the candidate said stimulating the extraordinary spike in What Podesta did not tell me in about climate change, which polls wind and especially solar power over the November-perhaps he didn't know showed was a major preoccupation of past five years. By 2013, the cost of roof~ yet-was that he would soon return top solar was falling so rapidly that Jon to Obama's inner circle to try to sal~ 1 President Obama, through a White House Wellinghoff, then the chair of the Fed~ vage his climate legacy: in January, he spokesman, declined to comment. eral Energy Regulatory Commission, REPORT 29 was telling reporters that it was "going A second cnt1c1sm of the cally unavoidable. After all, the bill to overtake everything." Waxman-Markey bill was that it un, established a nationwide limit on There were also the tougher fuel, dermined the Clean Air Act-and emissions, so it did not much matter efficiency rules that Obama mandat­ here we encounter one of the tower, if this or that individual facility kept ed when his administration rescued ing ironies of Obama's climate policy. polluting-,-such a facility's owners the failing U.S. auto industry. Gina On paper, he has all the authority he would be required to pay for a cor, McCarthy, who succeeded Lisa Jaclv needs to slash U.S. greenhouse,gas responding amount of emissions re, son as EPA chief in 2013, told me • emissions. Indeed, he has not just the ducdons elsewhere. In any case, with, that the new standards will produce authority but the obligation to do so, out such restrictions on the Clean "one of the biggest reductions in car, according to the Clean Air Act. The Air Act, energy companies and their bon pollution that this country has verb the act repeatedly employs is allies in Congress would simply sink seen." She put the number at about "shall"-as in "must." the bill.Z 6 billion metric tons-an amount Signed into law by President Rich, "There were only a few instances equal to the emissions of the entire ard Nixon in December 1970, just in which Clean Air Act authority United States in 2010.
Recommended publications
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Staffs: a Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome & Introductions
    Environmental Priorities of the Obama Administration Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. CST Welcome & Introductions ©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP 1 Introductions Linda E. Benfield ©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP Housekeeping Issues Call 866.493.2825 for technology assistance Dial *0 (star/zero) for audio assistance Ample time for live Q & A will be allotted at the end of the formal presentation We encourage you to Maximize the PowerPoint to Full Screen Usage: – Hit F5 on your keyboard; or – Select “View” from the toolbar menu and click “Full Screen” ©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP 2 Key Environmental Appointees Under the Obama Administration Richard G. Stoll is a partner in Foley & Lardner's Washington, D.C. office. He is a member of the firm's Environmental Practice, and concentrates on federal administrative and environmental law matters. Richard G. Stoll ©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP Key Environmental Appointees Under the Obama Administration Julie Solmer Stine is an associate at Foley & Lardner LLP. She is a member of the firm's Environmental Regulation Practice. Prior to joining Foley, Ms. Solmer Stine worked as an environmental compliance coordinator in the automotive industry, where she ensured facility compliance with EPA, OSHA, and DOT regulations; implemented environmental management systems; and obtained ISO 14001 certification. Julie S. Solmer Stine ©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP 3 New Administration – New Initiatives Mark Thimke is a partner with Foley & Lardner LLP. He is a member of the firm's Environmental Regulation, and Corporate Compliance & Enforcement Practices and the Energy Industry Team. Mr. Thimke's practice encompasses all major environmental programs including hazardous waste, Superfund, the Clean Air Act, air toxics, and wastewater.
    [Show full text]
  • U Tt.J \- T- �N ''-}�, '.�": -.•\Y
    0 t . United Nations . (-) Nations Upies · � l '])? f ' Executive Office of the Secretary - General · -f .....,..� . \_ .� ":>�, .,.,:".·:r·-:·-. · - · :;:.· �-· Cabinet du Secreta ire gene al - ""�· / : ,,�· · - ' · ·b' ;P . H , · .'£ ' -u tt.J \- t- �N ''-}�, '.�": -.•\Y. To: Mr. Nambiar, Please find attached a cover note from Akasaka forwarding a set of background materials on the new Obama administration .. We fear that �he materials are too long (and in some cases already dated). However, the SG might be interested in the second document, the memorandum from Will Davis (UNIC Washington)o�� to Mr. Akasaka on the foreign policy priorities Nicholas Haysom 23 January 2009 cc: KWS ,, 29-00799 ACTION� COPY ���l(y!J f-,.0 NOTE TO THE SECRETARY -GENERAL (Through Mr. Nambiar) New US Administration priorities and key figures v Please find for your information a note from Mr. Will Davis, Director .of the UN Information Centre (UNIC) in Washington D.C, outli!ling the Obama Administration's approach tci foreignpolicy. The note is accompanied by brief bios of the key members of his foreign policy team, as well as statements and other documents that address anticipated policy changes in the key players' own words. My Department is monitoring developments in Washington, and is considering new approaches for our outreach to US audiences, in close collaboration with our UNIC. Thank you. Kiyo Akasaka 22 January 2009 Recommended For SG's approval �D Approved D Action: For SG's attention Noted �� For SG's information Seen �q.'$ D Signed D (c For SG's signature Date:� (D Date::..__ Date. :_· ____ I ----:::-:----::-.:- Comment Comment (if applica ble): (if applicable): 7 cc: The Deputy-Secretary-General Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Billionaire's Club
    United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Minority Staff Report The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama’s EPA July 30, 2014 Contact: Luke Bolar — [email protected] (202) 224-6176 Cheyenne Steel — [email protected] (202) 224-6176 U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (Minority) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In his 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama famously chided the Supreme Court for its recent campaign finance decision by proclaiming, “With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."1 In another speech he further lamented, “There aren’t a lot of functioning democracies around the world that work this way where you can basically have millionaires and billionaires bankrolling whoever they want, however they want, in some cases undisclosed. What it means is ordinary Americans are shut out of the process.”2 These statements are remarkable for their blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation of the fact that the President and his cadre of wealthy liberal allies and donors embrace the very tactics he publically scorned. In reality, an elite group of left wing millionaires and billionaires, which this report refers to as the “Billionaire’s Club,” who directs and controls the far-left environmental movement, which in turn controls major policy decisions and lobbies on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Even more unsettling, a dominant organization in this movement is Sea Change Foundation, a private California foundation, which relies on funding from a foreign company with undisclosed donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on the Nominations of Lisa P. Jackson to Be Administrator of the U.S
    S. HRG. 111–1178 HEARING ON THE NOMINATIONS OF LISA P. JACKSON TO BE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND NANCY HELEN SUTLEY TO BE CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JANUARY 14, 2009 Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 94–020 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION BARBARA BOXER, California, Chairman MAX BAUCUS, Montana JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey DAVID VITTER, Louisiana BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont MIKE CRAPO, Idaho AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TOM UDALL, New Mexico JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, New York ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BETTINA POIRIER, Staff Director RUTH VAN MARK, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page JANUARY 14, 2009 OPENING STATEMENTS Boxer, Hon. Barbara, U.S. Senator from the State of California ........................ 1 Inhofe, Hon. James M., U.S. Senator from the State of Oklahoma .................... 3 Lautenberg, Hon. Frank, U.S. Senator from the State of New Jersey ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Transition Team
    President-Elect Barack Obama and Vice President-Elect Joe Biden Today Announced its Leadership For the Transition of Administrations Chicago -- For the past several months, a board of advisors has been informally planning for a possible presidential transition. Among the many projects undertaken by the transition board have been detailed analyses of previous transition efforts, policy statements made during the campaign, and the workings of federal government agencies, and priority positions that must be filled by the incoming administration. With Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s election, this planning process will be now be formally organized as the Obama-Biden Transition Project, a 501(c)(4) organization to ensure a smooth transition from one administration to the next. The work of this entity will be overseen by three co- chairs: John Podesta, Valerie Jarrett, and Pete Rouse. The co-chairs will be assisted by an advisory board comprised of individuals with significant private and public sector experience: Carol Browner, William Daley, Christopher Edley, Michael Froman, Julius Genachowski, Donald Gips, Governor Janet Napolitano, Federico Peña, Susan Rice, Sonal Shah, Mark Gitenstein, and Ted Kaufman. Gitenstein and Kaufman will serve as co-chairs of Vice President-elect Biden’s transition team. Supervising the day-to-day activities of the transition will be: Transition Senior Staff: Chris Lu -- Executive Director Dan Pfeiffer -- Communications Director Stephanie Cutter -- Chief Spokesperson Cassandra Butts -- General Counsel Jim Messina -- Personnel Director Patrick Gaspard -- Associate Personnel Director Christine Varney - Personnel Counsel Melody Barnes -- Co-Director of Agency Review Lisa Brown -- Co-Director of Agency Review Phil Schiliro -- Director of Congressional Relations Michael Strautmanis -- Director of Public Liaison and Intergovernmental Affairs Katy Kale -- Director of Operations Brad Kiley -- Director of Operations The phone number for the transition headquarters is 202-540-3000.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Nuclear Plank Could Lure GOP to Energy Bill from Energy on Page 1 Ects by $36 Billion, to a Total of Put on the Back Burner, the No- About $55 Billion
    SPECIAL SECTION MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010 POLITICO Energy: Lights Out? 21 AP From left: Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) compose the so-called tripartisan team pushing for energy reform. Strong Nuclear Plank Could Lure GOP to Energy Bill From ENERGY on Page 1 ects by $36 billion, to a total of put on the back burner, the no- about $55 billion. tion of running without a major Obama also has instructed accomplishment could spook called We Can Lead, which in- Energy Secretary Steven Chu to some lawmakers enough to en- cludes a mix of pro-reform busi- create a commission to study and gage in the energy debate, which nesses, is taking the campaign to provide new recommendations typically is driven by regional the public by running television about how to manage nuclear fuel interests rather than party iden- and print ads urging Congress and waste — an issue that has be- tification. to “move swiftly and boldly” and deviled the industry and tied up In addition, the shift in empha- pass legislation. Congress. sis in the debate to job creation — The intensive lobbying effort A strong nuclear plank in a com- an issue that better fits the voters’ comes at a time when the so- prehensive bill is critical to Gra- top priorities — could make an called tripartisan team of Sens. ham and could be a lure for other energy and climate bill more ap- John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Republicans, such as Tennessee pealing. Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieber- Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Security in the 21St Century a New National Strategy
    ENERGY SECURITY IN THE 21ST CeNTURY A New National Strategy JULY 2006 ENERGY SECURITY Task Force Members IN THE 21ST CeNTURY A New National Strategy Madeleine K. Albright Denis McDonough Samuel R. Berger James C. O’Brien Rand Beers Peter Ogden Report of the National Security Carol Browner John Podesta William Danvers Susan E. Rice Task Force on Energy Tom Daschle Wendy R. Sherman John Deutch Gayle Smith Thomas J. Downey Tara Sonenshine Michèle A. Flournoy Jim Steinberg Leon Fuerth Timothy E. Wirth Suzanne George The people listed above have endorsed this report as individuals, not as representatives of their respective organizations. Their endorsement does not necessarily indicate agreement with each specific recommendation. A New NaTIONAL STRATEGY resident Bush has declared that America is addicted to oil and dangerously dependent on unstable or hostile states for its energy supply. But while there is a consensus across the political spectrum that the current energy Pstrategy is failing, Democrats and Republicans fundamentally disagree about what should be done to address the threats posed by America’s dependence on foreign oil and the potentially catastrophic environmental damage caused by carbon emissions from the use of fossil fuels. The Bush administration has demonstrated a willingness to acknowledge the existence of such energy security challenges, but it has failed to implement a plan to meet them. In this report, leading energy and national security experts present a new, comprehensive energy security strategy that will put the United States on a path toward energy independence while enhancing our national, economic, and environmental security. This strategy breaks with the Bush administration’s approach by offering concrete steps to: • Reduce dependence on foreign oil and natural gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting the Politics of Climate Change
    SHIFTING THE POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS BIENNIAL REPORT 2013/2014 SHIFTING THE POLITICS LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS BIENNIAL REPORT 2013-2014 OF CLIMATE CHANGE In the last two years, the environmental movement has made major progress in the fight for climate action. Thank you for being a part of this important work. With your generous investment, we spent nearly $70 million in 2013-2014, a record for LCV. We used this support to help win historic advances from the Obama administration on climate change, including the EPA proposing the Clean Power Plan, which will be the first-ever national limits on carbon pollution from U.S. power plants. We successfully defeated relentless attacks on clean air, clean water, and public health from an environmentally-hostile U.S. House of Representatives and made denying climate science an increasingly toxic position for politicians. Our grassroots work in the states is booming. Since 2013, we have built a powerful volunteer organizing infrastructure in seven states and helped mobilize Latino communities on climate and clean energy issues. This work is unique to LCV among environmental groups. Our state LCV partners are gaining influence, defending core environmental protections, and winning important policy fights across the country. Our growing membership, now 1.2 million, is more engaged than ever in local, state, and national environmental fights. With your partnership, we exceeded our goals for the 2013-2014 election cycle, when LCV and state LCVs invested close to $30 million in federal and state races. Working with our friends at NRDC Action Fund, we also raised or contributed a record $5.8 million in direct support to candidates through LCV Action Fund’s respected GiveGreen bundling program.
    [Show full text]
  • Why EPA Wasn't Prepared
    Why EPA Was Unprepared for the Gulf Oil Disaster By David L. Lewis, Ph.D. Former EPA Research Microbiologist © 2010 by David L. Lewis, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved Why EPA Was Unprepared for the Gulf Oil Disaster By David L. Lewis, Ph.D., Former EPA Research Microbiologist† ________________________________________________________ In 1998, the U.S. Environmental Pro- tection Agency transferred me to the Department of Ma- rine Sciences at the Univer- sity of Georgia, in part, to investigate potential oil spills that could contaminate the Gulf Stream. To my knowl- edge, I was the only scientist at EPA who was concerned about the potential for a catastrophic blowout from an offshore rig in the Gulf of Mexico. My EPA assignment agreement stated that my re- search would apply to "petroleum products that may travel great distances in oil spills and outfalls in marine EPA Science Achievement Award (2000) presented by environments.” Administrator Carol Browner Unfortunately, I never had a chance to do the study. EPA worked with UGA to stop my research because of articles I published in Nature revealing gaps in EPA science.[1,2] Top EPA officials during the Clinton Administration transformed the Office of Research & Development (ORD) into a political tool to support EPA policies and protect certain indus- tries. My research was a top-priority target. EPA Administrator Carol Browner indicated to one Clinton appointee that she opposed what was happening, but said she was “overruled at the highest level.” †[email protected]. www.researchcenter.uga.edu July 4, 2010. How EPA prevented my oil-spill research At UGA, I wanted to isolate strains of marine bacteria capable of breaking oils and dispers- ants down to non-toxic byproducts, and have the bacteria freeze-dried and stored for injecting along with inorganic nutrients directly into leaking undersea pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Fellow Success Story
    Fellow Success Story A STAR Fellow Protecting the Environment With Economics Dr. Joe Aldy, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Using economics to develop effective policy solutions to environmental problems is clearly the passion of environmental economist Joe Aldy, who received a STAR Fellowship from 2000 to 2003 after serving from 1997 to 2000 on President William Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). In a career both in and out of government, Joe has negotiated with congressional staff over energy and environmental policies, worked on international climate change policy designs with China and other nations, and today continues his policy-related research while teaching a rising generation of Harvard University students. Joe’s long-standing interest in environmental protection—going back to his childhood growing up on a small farm in Lexington, Kentucky—led to his pursuit of a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Studies at Duke University and a Master’s degree in Environmental Management at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment. Joe joined President Clinton’s CEA at what he says was “probably the most exciting time ever for an environmental economist to be on staff.” He worked extensively on Kyoto Protocol issues leading to and following the 1997 conference, including work with China on indexing the country’s emissions reduction commitments to its economic growth. Although negotiations made little headway then, in 2009 China announced a first-ever emissions target indexed to its growth, and India soon followed. When he began his Ph.D. program in 2000 at Harvard’s Economics Department, with STAR Fellowship support for the first 3 years, Joe conducted international climate policy research.
    [Show full text]