DOCSLIB.ORG

Insect Olfaction from Model Systems to Disease Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insect Olfaction from Model Systems to Disease Control PERSPECTIVE Insect olfaction from model systems to disease control Allison F. Carey and John R. Carlson1 Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8103 Edited by John G. Hildebrand, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved May 23, 2011 (received for review March 12, 2011) Great progress has been made in the field of insect olfaction in recent years. Receptors, neurons, and circuits have been defined in considerable detail, and the mechanisms by which they detect, encode, and process sensory stimuli are being unraveled. We provide a guide to recent progress in the field, with special attention to advances made in the genetic model organism Drosophila. We highlight key questions that merit additional investigation. We then present our view of how recent advances may be applied to the control of disease- carrying insects such as mosquitoes, which transmit disease to hundreds of millions of people each year. We suggest how progress in defining the basic mechanisms of insect olfaction may lead to means of disrupting host-seeking and other olfactory behaviors, thereby reducing the transmission of deadly diseases. olfactory coding | odorant receptor | olfactory circuits | vector biology | pheromone he insect olfactory system has dimorphism is striking in some species. anogaster has 60 Or genes encoding 62 emerged as a prominent model For example, female Anopheles gambiae gene products through alternative splicing, fl in neuroscience. Investigation of mosquitoes possess three to four times whereas the red our beetle, Tribolium T more antennal sensilla than males (2). castaneum, has 341 predicted Ors (15). its organization and function has Such dimorphism may reflect function: Each Or is expressed within a spatially revealed surprising answers to fundamen- only female mosquitoes feed on blood, restricted subpopulation of ORNs (12–14, tal questions of how an animal detects, and they rely heavily on olfactory cues to 16). One exceptional receptor, formerly encodes, and processes sensory stimuli. locate their hosts (4). called Or83b and now called Orco, is ex- The olfactory system is also of immense Larvae of many insect species contain pressed in most ORNs of both the adult importance in the natural world, where it olfactory systems that are numerically and larval stages (12, 14, 16–21). The mediates attraction of insects to humans simpler than their adult counterparts, protein sequence of Orco is highly con- and thus underlies the transmission of perhaps reflecting the functional require- served among insect species (21–23), and ments of the two life stages. Adults often orthologs from different species can sub- disease to hundreds of millions of people fi each year. travel long distances to nd food, mates, or stitute for one another functionally (23, Remarkable progress has been made oviposition sites; they may encounter ol- 24). Orco forms a heteromer with Ors and over the past decade in elucidating mech- factory stimuli intermittently and follow is required for targeting of Ors to the anisms of insect olfaction, in many cases sparse odor gradients. By contrast, larvae ORN dendrites (21, 25, 26). More re- facilitated by the genetic tractability of the typically hatch from eggs laid directly on or cently, a surprising role for Orco in signal model organism Drosophila melanogaster. near a food source and do not navigate transduction has been identified, as Here, we consider recent advances in the over long distances. discussed below. understanding of insect olfactory re- Insect Ors are seven-transmembrane- ceptors, neurons, and circuits made in ORNs. In adults, the clustering of a small domain proteins and were long thought to Drosophila and other insect species. We number of ORNs in a sensillum allows be G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) present our view that this emerging body convenient physiological analysis of the like their counterparts in vertebrates and of knowledge poises the field to make cellular basis of olfaction. By inserting an C. elegans. However, in addition to lacking major contributions to the control of in- electrode into a sensillum, extracellular sequence similarity to known GPCRs, sect pests and vectors of disease, and we recordings of ORN responses to odors can their topology is inverted, with an in- highlight strategies for olfactory-based be obtained (Fig. 2C). Each ORN in a sen- tracellular N terminus and an extracellular vector control. We offer our perspec- sillum produces an action potential with C terminus (25, 27). Recent in vitro stud- tive on the most critical challenges to a characteristic relative amplitude, allowing ies indicate that the Or–Orco heteromer fi fulfilling this technological promise identi cation of the ORNs that respond functions as an odorant-gated ion channel and to solving the scientific problem of to a particular olfactory stimulus (Fig. 2D). (27–29). One of these studies provided how olfactory input is translated into Such electrophysiological recordings evidence that Orco can function as behavioral output. have revealed that different ORNs respond a channel independent of the canonical to overlapping subsets of odorants (5–7) Or, that it is stimulated by cyclic nucleo- and that the different morphological clas- tides, and that it can also signal through G Mechanisms of Insect Olfaction ses of sensilla are functionally distinct. In proteins, albeit at a slower time scale (28). Olfactory Organs. Insects sense the volatile many insect species, the ORNs of some Although there are some in vivo data chemical world with antennae (Fig. 1). single-walled sensilla respond to pher- consistent with a role for G proteins in Additional organs such as maxillary palps omones, whereas the neurons of others olfactory signaling (30), a systematic study also detect odors in many species. Olfac- are sensitive to more general odorants, of single-sensillum ORN physiology after tory organs are covered with sensory hairs such as food odors (8). The double-walled genetic manipulations of G proteins did called sensilla, each of which typically sensilla are found in many insect orders, not find evidence that they contribute to houses the dendrites of a few olfactory reflecting an ancient origin (9). They are odor sensitivity (31). receptor neurons (ORNs) (Fig. 2 A and B) often sensitive to polar compounds, in- An intriguing theme in both vertebrate (1, 2). Olfactory sensilla fall into mor- cluding amines, carboxylic acids, and water and invertebrate olfaction is that dis- phological classes, including long, single- vapor (10, 11). tinct classes of receptors continue to be walled sensilla and short, double-walled sensilla. The numbers of sensilla and Odorant Receptors. The first insect odorant ORNs per antenna vary dramatically receptors (Ors) were identified just over among species. The moth Manduca sexta a decade ago (12–14). Ors are unrelated in Author contributions: A.F.C. and J.R.C. wrote the paper. contains >100,000 antennal sensilla hous- sequence to odorant receptors of mam- The authors declare no conflict of interest. ing >250,000 ORNs, whereas ∼400 sen- mals, fish, or Caenorhabditis elegans. The This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. silla housing ∼1,200 ORNs are found in insect genomes characterized to date 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: the D. melanogaster antenna (1, 3). Sexual contain from 60 to 341 Or genes; D. mel- [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1103472108 PNAS | August 9, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 32 | 12987–12995 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 pendence nor the transduction mechanism terns are diverse, with overlapping subsets has been defined (31). Two transient re- of OBPs found in different sensilla (45). ceptor potential (TRP) channels have The diversity of OBP expression patterns been implicated in humidity detection in and large numbers of OBPs are reminiscent D. melanogaster (36); however, it will be of odorant receptors; they suggest an in- important to resolve whether these chan- teresting role in shaping the odor response nels are humidity receptors or components profiles of ORNs within the sensilla that of downstream signaling machinery. contain them. However, when individual The most recently identified insect odorant receptors were misexpressed in receptors for odorants are related to ion- a sensillum that presumably contains a dif- otropic glutamate receptors (IRs) (37). ferent complement of OBPs than the sen- Several IRs are expressed in ORNs housed sillum in which the receptors are in the coeloconic sensilla of D. mela- endogenously expressed, the receptors nogaster, a sensillum class that, with rare conferred odor response profiles very sim- exceptions (10), does not express Ors. ilar to those observed in the endogenous Misexpression of two IRs conferred re- sensillum (46, 47). These results suggested sponses to odorants that evoked responses that odorant receptors are sufficient to from coeloconic ORNs, supporting a role confer the odor specificity of an ORN, at for IRs as receptors in these ORNs; IRs least for many receptors and many general Fig. 1. Insect antennae. (Clockwise from upper are likely to detect a variety of acids, al- odorants. However, OBPs seem likely to left) Moth (Image courtesy of Geoffrey Attardo, play roles in the dynamics of olfactory re- ’ dehydes, and amines, including ammonia Yale School of Public Health); Leconte s Scarab, (37). The sequence similarity of IRs to li- sponse and in olfactory sensitivity. Two Chrysina lecontei (Image courtesy of Alex Wild); gand-gated ion channels suggested that recent studies have reported decreased nymph of Barytettix humphreysi (Image courtesy they act as odor-gated ion channels, a hy- electrophysiological responses to odorants of Jeffrey C. Oliver); meloid beetle, Lytta magister pothesis that has recently been supported when an OBP was targeted with RNAi (48, (Image courtesy of Jeffrey C. Oliver); butterfly by functional studies (38). 49), and variations in behavioral responses (Image courtesy of Geoffrey Attardo); beetle (Im- to odorants have been associated with age courtesy of Geoffrey Attardo); ant (Image From Air to Receptor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Late Ross H. Arnett, Jr., Ph.D. Michael C. Thomas, Ph.D. Paul E
    VOLUME 2 AMERICAN BEETLES Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea VOLUME 2 AMERICAN BEETLES Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea Edited by the late Ross H. Arnett, Jr., Ph.D. Michael C. Thomas, Ph.D. Paul E. Skelley, Ph.D. and J. Howard Frank, D. Phil. CRC Press Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. COVER FIGURES: Center - Coccinellidae, Harmonia axyridus (Palles) [Photo by Fred J. Santana]. Outer rim, clockwise from top: Ripiphoridae, Macrosiagon cruentum (Germar) [by Fred J. Santana]; Meloidae, Lytta magister Horn [by Charles L. Bellamy]; Carabidae, Rhadine exilis (Barr and Lawrence) [by James C. Cokendolpher]; Melyridae, Malachius mirandus (LeConte) [by Max E. Badgley]; Lampyridae, Microphotus angustus LeConte [by Arthur V. Evans]. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data American beetles / edited by Ross H. Arnett and Michael C. Thomas. p. cm. Contents: v. 1. Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphyliniformia. Includes bibliographical references (p.). ISBN 0-8493-0954-9 (alk. paper : v. 2)) 1. Beetles—North America. I. Arnett, Ross H. II. Thomas, M. C. (Michael Charles). 1948– QL581 .A43 2002 595.76¢097—dc21 00-050809 CIP This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use. Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Properties of Insect Olfactory Receptors: Ionotropic Receptors and Odorant Receptors
    Cell and Tissue Research (2021) 383:7–19 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03363-x REVIEW Functional properties of insect olfactory receptors: ionotropic receptors and odorant receptors Dieter Wicher1 · Fabio Miazzi2 Received: 14 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published online: 27 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract The majority of insect olfactory receptors belong to two distinct protein families, the ionotropic receptors (IRs), which are related to the ionotropic glutamate receptor family, and the odorant receptors (ORs), which evolved from the gustatory recep- tor family. Both receptor types assemble to heteromeric ligand-gated cation channels composed of odor-specifc receptor proteins and co-receptor proteins. We here present in short the current view on evolution, function, and regulation of IRs and ORs. Special attention is given on how their functional properties can meet the environmental and ecological challenges an insect has to face. Keywords Insect olfaction · Ionotropic receptor · Odorant receptor · Ion channel · Olfactory sensory neuron · Signal transduction · Sensitization · Adaptation Introduction receptors (IRs). The frst members of the OR family were discovered two decades ago (Clyne et al. 1999; Gao and The olfactory system is dedicated to detect and to encode Chess 1999; Vosshall et al. 1999), whereas the IRs that are information from volatile chemical signals. Such signals can related to ionotropic glutamate receptors were frst reported be categorized according to the information they transfer. ten years later (Benton et al. 2009). For example, chemosignals involved in social communica- While ORs solely detect volatile chemosignals, IRs tion may be informative solely for the receiver as an olfac- are multimodal receptive entities (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Altered Functional Properties of the Codling Moth Orco Mutagenized in the Intracellular Loop‑3 Yuriy V
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Altered functional properties of the codling moth Orco mutagenized in the intracellular loop‑3 Yuriy V. Bobkov1, William B. Walker III2 & Alberto Maria Cattaneo1,2* Amino acid substitutions within the conserved polypeptide sequence of the insect olfactory receptor co‑receptor (Orco) have been demonstrated to infuence its pharmacological properties. By sequence analysis and phylogenetic investigation, in the Lepidopteran subgroup Ditrysia we identifed a fxed substitution in the intracellular loop‑3 (ICL‑3) of a conserved histidine to glutamine. By means of HEK293 cells as a heterologous system, we functionally expressed Orco from the Ditrysian model Cydia pomonella (CpomOrco) and compared its functional properties with a site‑directed mutagenized version where this ICL‑3‑glutamine was reverted to histidine (CpomOrcoQ417H). The mutagenized CpomOrcoQ417H displayed decreased responsiveness to VUAA1 and reduced response efcacy to an odorant agonist was observed, when co‑transfected with the respective OR subunit. Evidence of reduced responsiveness and sensitivity to ligands for the mutagenized Orco suggest the fxed glutamine substitution to be optimized for functionality of the cation channel within Ditrysia. In addition, contrary to the wild type, the mutagenized CpomOrcoQ417H preserved characteristics of VUAA‑binding when physiologic conditions turned to acidic. Taken together, our fndings provide further evidence of the importance of ICL‑3 in forming basic functional properties of insect Orco‑ and Orco/OR‑channels, and suggest involvement of ICL‑3 in the potential functional adaptation of Ditrysian Orcos to acidifed extra‑/intracellular environment. Te odorant receptor co-receptor, Orco, is a unique transmembrane protein, expressed in most of the olfac- tory sensory neurons (OSNs) of insect antennae1–3 and is highly conserved in sequence and function across all insects4,5.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Relationships in a Small Habitat-Dependent Coral Reef Fish: an Ecological, Behavioural and Genetic Analysis
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Rueger, Theresa (2016) Social relationships in a small habitat-dependent coral reef fish: an ecological, behavioural and genetic analysis. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46690/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46690/ Social relationships in a small habitat- dependent coral reef fish: an ecological, behavioural and genetic analysis Thesis submitted by Theresa Rueger, March 2016 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Marine and Environmental Science & ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Declaration of Ethics This research presented and reported in this thesis was conducted in compliance with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 7th Edition, 2004 and the Qld Animal Care and Protection Act, 2001. The proposed research study received animal ethics approval from the JCU Animal Ethics Committee Approval Number #A1847. Signature ___31/3/2016___ Date i Acknowledgement This thesis was no one-woman show. There is a huge number of people who contributed, directly or indirectly, to its existence. I had amazing support during my field work, by fellow students and good friends Tiffany Sih, James White, Patrick Smallhorn-West, and Mariana Alvarez-Noriega.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions & Reflections on the Origin of Smell: Odorant Receptors in Insects
    Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63 (2006) 1579–1585 1420-682X/06/141579-7 DOI 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2006 Visions & Reflections On the ORigin of smell: odorant receptors in insects R. Benton Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 63, New York, New York 10021 (USA), Fax: +1 212 327 7238, e-mail: [email protected] Received 23 March 2006; accepted 28 April 2006 Online First 19 June 2006 Abstract. Olfaction, the sense of smell, depends on large, suggested that odours are perceived by a conserved mecha- divergent families of odorant receptors that detect odour nism. Here I review recent revelations of significant struc- stimuli in the nose and transform them into patterns of neu- tural and functional differences between the Drosophila ronal activity that are recognised in the brain. The olfactory and mammalian odorant receptor proteins and discuss the circuits in mammals and insects display striking similarities implications for our understanding of the evolutionary and in their sensory physiology and neuroanatomy, which has molecular biology of the insect odorant receptors. Keywords. Olfaction, odorant receptor, signal transduction, GPCR, neuron, insect, mammal, evolution. Olfaction: the basics characterised by the presence of seven membrane-span- ning segments with an extracellular N terminus. OR pro- Olfaction is used by most animals to extract vital infor- teins are exposed to odours on the ciliated endings of olf- mation from volatile chemicals in the environment, such actory sensory neuron (OSN) dendrites in the olfactory as the presence of food or predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Djvu Document
    Vol. 5, No. 2, June 1991 65 On the Nomenclature and ClasSification of the Meloic;1ae (Coleoptera) Richard B. Selander Florida State Collection of Arthropods P. O. Box 147100 Gainesville, Florida 32614-7100 Abstract menelature (International Commission on Zoologi Forty-three availablefamily-group names (and three cal Nomenclature 1985). unavaillihle names) in Meloidae are listed as a basis fOr establishing nomenclatural priority. Available genus- , with indication of the type species of each; this is fol- Borcbmann (1917), and Kaszab (1969) have pub- lished classifications ofthe Meloidae to the generic or subgeneric level on a worldwide basis. None Of nomenc a ure. na y, a Classl Ica on 0 te amI y Meloidae to the subgeneric level is presented in which the three paid much attention to the priority of names at the famIly-group and genus-group levels are family-group names, nor in general ha"e the many treated in a manner consistent with the provisions ofthe authors who have dealt with restricted segments of InternatIOnal Code of ZoolOgIcal Nomenclature. TIils the meloid fauna. Kaszab's (1969) method of classification recognizes three subfamilies (Eleticinae, assigning authorship was particularly confusing In Meloinae, and Horiinae), 10 tribes, 15 subtribes, 116 violation of the ICZN and general practice in genera, and 66 subgenera. The subtribes Pyrotina and zoology, he gave authorship to the first author to Lydina (properly Alosimina), ofthe tribe Cerocomini, are use a name at a particular taxonomic level. For combined with the subtribe Lyttina. The tribe Steno- example, Eupomphini was CI edited to Selandel derini, of the subfamily Horiinae, is defined to include (l955b) but Eupomphina to Kaszab (1959) (actually Stenodera Eschscholtz.Epispasta Selanderistransferred from Cerocomini to Meloini.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources and Management
    Vermilion flycatcher The upper Muddy River is considered one of the Mojave’s most important Common buckeye on sunflower areas of biodiversity and regionally Coyote (Canis latrans) Damselfly (Enallagma sp.) (Junonia coenia on Helianthus annuus) important ecological but threatened riparian landscapes (Provencher et al. 2005). Not only does the Warm Springs Natural Area encompass the majority of Muddy River tributaries it is also the largest single tract of land in the upper Muddy River set aside for the benefit of native species in perpetuity. The prominence of water in an otherwise barren Mojave landscape provides an oasis for regional wildlife. A high bird diversity is attributed to an abundance of riparian and floodplain trees and shrubs. Contributions to plant diversity come from the Mojave Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon) Desertsnow (Linanthus demissus) Lobe-leaved Phacelia (Phacelia crenulata) Cryptantha (Cryptantha sp.) vegetation that occur on the toe slopes of the Arrow Canyon Range from the west and the plant species occupying the floodplain where they are supported by a high water table. Several marshes and wet meadows add to the diversity of plants and animals. The thermal springs and tributaries host an abundance of aquatic species, many of which are endemic. The WSNA provides a haven for the abundant wildlife that resides permanently or seasonally and provides a significant level of protection for imperiled species. Tarantula (Aphonopelma spp.) Beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris) Pacific tree frog (Pseudacris regilla)
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscrit Début
    Université de Bourgogne UMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences THÈSE Pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Sciences de la Vie Spécialité : Ecologie Evolutive Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans: an empirical and theoretical approach Matthias Galipaud Directeur de thèse : Loïc Bollache Co-directeur de thèse : François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont Jury Loïc Bollache, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Directeur Frank Cézilly, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Examinateur François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont, Maître de conférences, Université de Bourgogne Directeur Tim W. Fawcett, Research associate, University of Bristol Examinateur Jacques Labonne, Chargé de recherche, INRA, Saint-Pée sur Nivelle Examinateur François Rousset, Directeur de recherche, CNRS, Université Montpellier II Rapporteur Michael Taborsky, Professor, University of BERN Rapporteur Remerciements Voici le résultat de plus de trois années de recherches que j’ai eu la chance d’effectuer au sein de l’équipe écologie/évolution du laboratoire Biogéosciences de l’université de Bourgogne. Ceci n’est pas un aboutissement puisque, je l’espère, il me reste encore de nombreuses choses à expérimenter et découvrir aussi bien concernant aussi bien la recherche en sélection sexuelle que celle en biologie évolutive en général. Pour m’avoir donné accès à un environnement de travail exceptionnel (les locaux dijonnais offrent un cadre idéal à la tenue de travaux de thèse) je tiens à remercier l’université de Bourgogne ainsi que Monsieur le directeur du laboratoire, le Professeur Pascal Neige. Cinq personnalités scientifiques m’ont fait l’honneur de faire partie de mon jury de thèse. Je voudrais tout d’abord remercier les deux rapporteurs de mon travail qui ont bien voulu prendre de leur temps pour me lire et m’apporter de précieuses corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Sejarah-Arti-Penting-Serangga.Pdf
    9/26/2017 References Anonimous. WY. Encyclopedia of Animals. Volume 7. Insects and Spiders. VCD. _____________. Macedonia. http://www.usask.ca/antiquities/coins/ macedonia.html. _____________. True Gems: Indian Rock Art. http://www.eskimo.com/~noir/ southwest/rockart/ _________. 1995. Encyclopedia of Nature. Dorling Kindersley Multimedia. CD ROM. _________. 1998. Coleoptera. Colorado Mountain College. http://www.coloradomtn.edu/campus_rfl/staff_rfl/kohls/01.jpg _________. 2002. Mural of the Lazy Grasshopper. Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago. http://www.msichicago.org/exhibit/fairy_castle/1_3.HTM _________. 2002. Subphylum Insecta Classification. Insect Fossil. The Virtual Fossil Museum Net. http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Tree_of_Life/ Phylum%20Arthropoda/Subphylum_insecta/subphylum_insecta_fossils.htm. _________. 2003. Pediculus humanus and Phthirus pubis (body and pubic [crab] lice). Parasites and Parasitological Resources. College of Biological Sciences 484 West 12th Avenue Columbus. OH 43210-1292 USA. Ohio State. http://www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/lice.html _________. 2004. Malaria Centre – Introduction. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. University of London. Keppel Street. London WC1E 7HT. United Kingdom. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/malaria/introduction.htm _________. 2004. Medical Encyclopedia. Head lice. U.S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/imagepages/17207.htm References Aabech, J.S. 2004. Lanzarote - Our Holdiay Island !. Skogbrynet 40B, N-1709 Sarpsborg. Norway. http://www.vulkaner.no/t/lanza/cactus.html Alante and Jacob. 2003. Migration is Not for Babies:Monarch Butterfly Migration. Journey North. 6234 Mt. Philo Road. Charlotte, Vermont 05445. http://www.learner.org/jnorth/fall2003/monarch/Update092603.html Backus, E.A. WY. Introductory Entomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo Taxonómico-Geográfico De Los Coleópteros De La Familia Meloidae De México
    Graellsia, 63(2): 165-258 (2007) CATÁLOGO TAXONÓMICO-GEOGRÁFICO DE LOS COLEÓPTEROS DE LA FAMILIA MELOIDAE DE MÉXICO M. García-París1, D. Buckley1,3 y G. Parra-Olea2 RESUMEN Se presenta un catálogo taxonómico de los representantes mexicanos de la familia Meloidae que incluye un listado revisado de sinonimias, localidades típicas y registros geográficos publicados de cada una de las especies. La fauna mexicana incluye en la actualidad 255 especies vivientes y una fósil, distribuidas en 21 géneros de las subfami- lias Meloinae, Nemognathinae y Tetraonycinae. En el último catálogo general, Black- welder (1945) recogió la presencia en México de 160 especies de esta familia, casi 100 especies menos de las que se conocen en la actualidad y sin embargo, la cifra actual pare- ce encontrarse aún lejos de la real, ya que existen muchas especies ampliamente distri- buidas al norte de la frontera con los Estados Unidos cuya presencia es muy probable en territorio mexicano. En cuanto a la taxonomía y nomenclatura de las especies, en este catálogo se propo- ne el uso de los nombres Epicauta dugesi Werner, 1957 y Tegrodera erosa extincta Beauregard, 1890; se incluyen tres sinonimias nuevas de Nemognatha chrysomeloides (Linnaeus, 1763) (N. atra Beauregard, 1890; N. pallidicollis Beauregard, 1890 y N. vio- lacea Beauregard, 1890) y otra de E. dugesi (Epicauta tamara Adams & Selander, 1979); se designa lectotipo para Lytta koltzei var. minor Haag-Rutenberg, 1880 con el propósito de solucionar el problema taxonómico generado tras la designación inválida de lectotipo de L. k. var. cyanescens; y finalmente se consideran como especies posible- mente a excluir del listado de Meloidae de México a Cissites maculata (Swederus, 1787) y Tetraonyx (Tetraonyx) bimaculatus (Klug, 1825).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chemoreceptor Evolution in Behavioral Change Cande, Prud’Homme and Gompel 153
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Smells like evolution: the role of chemoreceptor evolution in behavioral change Jessica Cande, Benjamin Prud’homme and Nicolas Gompel In contrast to physiology and morphology, our understanding success. How an organism interacts with its environment of how behaviors evolve is limited.This is a challenging task, as can be divided into three parts: first, the sensory percep- it involves the identification of both the underlying genetic tion of diverse auditory, visual, tactile, chemosensory or basis and the resultant physiological changes that lead to other cues; second, the processing of this information by behavioral divergence. In this review, we focus on the central nervous system (CNS), leading to a repres- chemosensory systems, mostly in Drosophila, as they are one entation of the sensory signal; and third, a behavioral of the best-characterized components of the nervous system response. Thus, behaviors could evolve either through in model organisms, and evolve rapidly between species. We changes in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) (e.g. examine the hypothesis that changes at the level of [1 ]), or through changes in higher-order neural circuitry chemosensory systems contribute to the diversification of (Figure 1). While the latter remain elusive, recent work behaviors. In particular, we review recent progress in on chemosensation in insects illustrates how the PNS understanding how genetic changes between species affect shapes behavioral evolution. chemosensory systems and translate into divergent behaviors. A major evolutionary trend is the rapid Chemosensation in insects depends on three classes of diversification of the chemoreceptor repertoire among receptors expressed in peripheral neurons housed in species.
    [Show full text]
  • Amargosa River Expert Bioblitz April 7-9 , 2017 Final Report
    Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz April 7-9th, 2017 Final Report Photo credit: Janine Knapp Please cite this document as: Parker, S.S., B.S. Cohen, N. Fraga, B. Brown, J. Cole, W. Chatfield-Taylor, K. Guadalupe, G.B. Pauly, D. Cooper, and M. Ordeñana. 2017. Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy. Los Angeles, California. 50 pp. ii Report Contributors: Sophie S. Parker The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Brian S. Cohen The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Naomi Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden [email protected] Brian Brown Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Jeffrey Cole Pasadena City College [email protected] Will Chatfield-Taylor [email protected] Kevin Guadalupe Nevada Department of Wildlife [email protected] Gregory B. Pauly Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Daniel Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. [email protected] Miguel Ordeñana Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] iii Acknowledgements We thank our agency partners at the Bureau of Land Management, particularly C. Otahal, who co-organized the Amargosa River BioBlitz. We also thank the Amargosa Conservancy for supporting the collection efforts, and private land owners B. Brown of China Ranch and S. Sorrells of Shoshone Village for hosting volunteers on their property. iv Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context: Amargosa Watershed Conservation .............................................. 1 II. What is an Expert BioBlitz? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]