The Role of an Environmental Gradient in Driving Population Divergence in Common Gobies (Pomatoschistus Microps)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of an Environmental Gradient in Driving Population Divergence in Common Gobies (Pomatoschistus Microps) The role of an environmental gradient in driving population divergence in common gobies (Pomatoschistus microps) DISSERTATION der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von ISABEL MAGDALENA MÜCK aus Bad Reichenhall TÜBINGEN 2016 Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 25. 05. 2016 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Dr. Katja Heubel 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Katharina Foerster “There is no substitute for careful and intensive field work if one wants to find out what is happening in natural populations.” Endler, 1986 Table of Contents Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................................... 7 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental-dependent sexual selection .................................................................................... 9 Neutral versus adaptive evolution ................................................................................................ 10 Environmental gradients ............................................................................................................... 11 The Baltic Sea ................................................................................................................................ 12 The common goby (Pomatoschistus microps) .............................................................................. 14 Study goals ............................................................................................................................................ 16 (I) Ecological variation along the salinity gradient in the Baltic Sea and its consequences for mating success in common gobies .................................................................................................................... 16 (II) Population divergence in common gobies: neutral or adaptive evolution?.................................... 17 (III) Gonadal investment in common gobies along the salinity gradient in the Baltic Sea .................... 18 CHAPTER I .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Ecological Variation along the Salinity Gradient in the Baltic Sea and its Consequences for Mating Success in Common Gobies ................................................................................................................... 20 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 24 Study species ................................................................................................................................. 24 Field study design .......................................................................................................................... 25 Habitat survey ............................................................................................................................... 25 Nesting resources .......................................................................................................................... 26 Population density and sex ratios ................................................................................................. 28 Body size ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Mating assay .................................................................................................................................. 29 Data analyses ................................................................................................................................. 30 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 32 Nesting resources .......................................................................................................................... 32 Population density ......................................................................................................................... 35 Operational sex ratio ..................................................................................................................... 35 Body size ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Male body size and size of Mya arenaria ...................................................................................... 37 Mating assay .................................................................................................................................. 38 Brood characteristics ..................................................................................................................... 40 Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 42 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER II............................................................................................................................................. 50 Population Divergence in Common Gobies: Neutral or Adaptive Evolution? ....................................... 51 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 56 Study species ................................................................................................................................. 56 Fish collection and sampling sites ................................................................................................. 56 Genetic analyses ............................................................................................................................ 59 PST - FST comparison ........................................................................................................................ 62 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 64 Genetic analyses ............................................................................................................................ 64 PST- FST comparison ........................................................................................................................ 72 Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 73 Genetic structure of common gobies on coarse and fine spatial scales ....................................... 73 Neutral versus adaptive evolutionary processes driving population divergence ......................... 75 Roles of natural selection versus genetic drift on phenotypic population divergence in Baltic common gobies: a PST – FST comparison ........................................................................................ 77 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 79 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 80 Supplemental data ............................................................................................................................ 81 ........................................................................................................................................................... 83 CHAPTER III ........................................................................................................................................... 83 Gonadal Investment in Common Gobies along the Salinity Gradient in the Baltic Sea ........................ 84 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 84 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 85 Methods
Recommended publications
  • Fish Characteristics
    FISH CHARACTERISTICS There are approximately 25,000 different species of fish. A fish is an animal with a backbone (a vertebrate) that is adapted to live in water. Fishes use gills to breathe, and most fishes have scales covering their skin. Scales serve as a form of protection. Fishes are also cold-blooded, which means that their body temperature is regulated by the temperature of the surrounding water. Bony fishes inhabit almost every body of water, from tropical, polar, and temperate seas, to freshwater and brackish environments. Scientists discover about 200-300 new fish species every year. Believe it or not, there are more fishes on our planet than birds or mammals. Dorsal (back) fin Do you enjoy gymnastics? Have you ever watched a gymnast on the balance beam? They need to stay Caudal (tail) fin nice and steady, placing one foot Pectoral (side) fin gently over the next, to stay steady Have you ever helped your Have you ever pretended and straight. The dorsal fin helps a mom or dad check the oil in the you were a race car driver, fish to swim steady and provides family car? You need to check zooming down the track? balance in the water. the engine because the engine You speed through the helps the car to move fast - it straight-a-way and then turn gives the car speed and power! the steering wheel quickly In most fish, the caudal fin when you reach the curve to provides the speed and power go left or right. The pectoral for swimming, just like a car fin is just like a steering engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Activities of Two Euryhaline Small-Sized Fish in a Western Baltic Brackish Fjord
    HELGOL.~NDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgolander Meeresunters. 45,287-300 (1991) Feeding activities of two euryhaline small-sized fish in a western Baltic brackish fjord Birgit Antholz, Wolfgang Meyer-Antholz & C. Dieter Zander Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der Universit~t Hamburg; Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-W-2000 Hamburg 13, Federal Repubfic of Germany ABSTRACT: The daily food intake and feeding activities of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer) and the nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius (L.) were investigated in the brackish Schlei fjord. At the investigation site of Olpenitz, salinities varied between 11 and 15 %o, and water temperatures between 5 and 18 ~ during the period of in-situ experiments in 1981 and 1982. Common gobies sometimes attained a density of more than 100 individuals per square metre, nine-spined sticklebacks as much as 18 individuals per square meter. Their food changed depend- ing on the supply of plankton or benthos. Regarding numbers, their food consisted mainly of harpacticoids, in springtimes of calanoids; with regard to weight, amphipods, polychaetes or chironomid larvae often prevailed. The total food ingestion, measured by means of its relation to fish weights (fullness index), was highest in spring and summer: 2.3 % in P. microps and 2.6 % in P. pungitius. Low fullness indices of 0.8 % in P. microps and 0.3 % in P. pungitius were found during times of low water temperatures. 24-h field investigations revealed that the adult P. microps presented clear diurnal rhythms with highest fullness indices after dawn and a further maximum at dusk. Only young gobies ingested some benthos at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Demersal Fish Fauna in a Baltic Archipelago As Estimated by SCUBA Census
    MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 23: 3143, 1985 Published April 25 Mar. Ecol. hog. Ser. 1 l Spatial and temporal distribution of the demersal fish fauna in a Baltic archipelago as estimated by SCUBA census B.-0. Jansson, G. Aneer & S. Nellbring Asko Laboratory, Institute of Marine Ecology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT: A quantitative investigation of the demersal fish fauna of a 160 km2 archipelago area in the northern Baltic proper was carried out by SCUBA census technique. Thirty-four stations covering seaweed areas, shallow soft bottoms with seagrass and pond weeds, and deeper, naked soft bottoms down to a depth of 21 m were visited at all seasons. The results are compared with those obtained by traditional gill-net fishing. The dominating species are the gobiids (particularly Pornatoschistus rninutus) which make up 75 % of the total fish fauna but only 8.4 % of the total biomass. Zoarces viviparus, Cottus gobio and Platichtys flesus are common elements, with P. flesus constituting more than half of the biomass. Low abundance of all species except Z. viviparus is found in March-April, gobies having a maximum in September-October and P. flesus in November. Spatially, P. rninutus shows the widest vertical range being about equally distributed between surface and 20 m depth. C. gobio aggregates in the upper 10 m. The Mytilus bottoms and the deeper soft bottoms are the most populated areas. The former is characterized by Gobius niger, Z. viviparus and Pholis gunnellus which use the shelter offered by the numerous boulders and stones. The latter is totally dominated by P.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Length-Weight Relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey
    EISSN 2602-473X AQUATIC SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Aquat Sci Eng 2019; 34(3): 96-102 • DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019573052 Research Article Diversity and Length-Weight relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey Deniz İnnal1 Cite this article as: Innal, D. (2019). Diversity and length-weight relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(3), 96-102. ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the species composition and range of Mediterranean Blennies (Ac- tinopterygii, Blenniidae) occurring in river estuaries and lagoon systems of the Mediterranean coast of Turkey, and to characterise the length–weight relationship of the specimens. A total of 15 sites were surveyed from November 2014 to June 2017. A total of 210 individuals representing 3 fish species (Rusty blenny-Parablennius sanguinolentus, Freshwater blenny-Salaria fluviatilis and Peacock blenny-Salaria pavo) were sampled from five (Beşgöz Creek Estuary, Manavgat River Es- tuary, Karpuzçay Creek Estuary, Köyceğiz Lagoon Lake and Beymelek Lagoon Lake) of the locali- ties investigated. The high juvenile densities of S. fluviatilis in Karpuzçay Creek Estuary and P. sanguinolentus in Beşgöz Creek Estuary were observed. Various threat factors were observed in five different native habitats of Blenny species. The threats on the habitat and the population of the species include the introduction of exotic species, water ORCID IDs of the authors: pollution, and more importantly, the destruction of habitats. Five non-indigenous species (Prus- D.İ.: 0000-0002-1686-0959 sian carp-Carassius gibelio, Eastern mosquitofish-Gambusia holbrooki, Redbelly tilapia-Copt- 1Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy odon zillii, Stone moroko-Pseudorasbora parva and Rainbow trout-Oncorhynchus mykiss) were University, Department of Biology, observed in the sampling sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces Under Water Exploring and Protecting the Cultural Heritage in the North Sea and Baltic Sea
    2019 | Discussion No. 23 Traces under water Exploring and protecting the cultural heritage in the North Sea and Baltic Sea Christian Anton | Mike Belasus | Roland Bernecker Constanze Breuer | Hauke Jöns | Sabine von Schorlemer Publication details Publisher Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina e. V. – German National Academy of Sciences – President: Prof. Dr. Jörg Hacker Jägerberg 1, D-06108 Halle (Saale) Editorial office Christian Anton, Constanze Breuer & Johannes Mengel, German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina Copy deadline November 2019 Contact [email protected] Image design Sarah Katharina Heuzeroth, Hamburg Cover image Sarah Katharina Heuzeroth, Hamburg Fictitious representation of the discovery of a hand wedge using a submersible: The exploration of prehistoric landscapes in the sediments of the North Sea and Baltic Sea could one day lead to the discovery of traces of human activity or campsites. Translation GlobalSprachTeam ‒ Sassenberg+Kollegen, Berlin Proofreading Alan Frostick, Frostick & Peters, Hamburg Typesetting unicommunication.de, Berlin Print druckhaus köthen GmbH & Co. KG ISBN 978-3-8047-4070-9 Bibliographic Information of the German National Library The German National Library lists this publication in the German National Bibliography. Detailed bibliographic data are available online at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Suggested citation Anton, C., Belasus, M., Bernecker, R., Breuer, C., Jöns, H., & Schorlemer, S. v. (2019). Traces under water. Exploring and protecting the cultural heritage in the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Halle (Saale): German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. Traces under water Exploring and protecting the cultural heritage in the North Sea and Baltic Sea Christian Anton | Mike Belasus | Roland Bernecker Constanze Breuer | Hauke Jöns | Sabine von Schorlemer The Leopoldina Discussions series publishes contributions by the authors named.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Seafloor Mapping in German Marine Waters
    Guideline for Seafloor Mapping in German Marine Waters Using High-Resolution Sonars Guideline for Seafloor Mapping in German Marine Waters Using High-Resolution Sonars Version 1.0 30.04.2016 This guideline has been developed by the following people: Dr. Claudia Propp2 (Coordination) Dr. Svenja Papenmeier1 Dr. Alexander Bartholomä5 Dr. Peter Richter 3 Dr. Christian Hass1 Dr. Klaus Schwarzer 3 Dr. Peter Holler 5 Dr. Franz Tauber 4 Maria Lambers-Huesmann 2 Dr. Manfred Zeiler 2 1 Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Wadden Sea Station Sylt (AWI) 2 Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) 3 Christian Albrecht University of Kiel, Institute of Geosciences (CAU) 4 Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Department of Marine Geology (IOW) 5 Senckenberg am Meer, Wilhelmshaven © Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) Hamburg and Rostock 2016 www.bsh.de BSH No. 7201 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or processed, copied, or distributed using electronic systems without the written permission of the BSH. This document should be cited as follows: BSH, 2016: Guideline for Seafloor Mapping in German Marine Waters Using High-Resolution Sonars. BSH No. 7201, 147 p. Translated by ConTec Fachübersetzungen GmbH and reviewed by Dr. Claudia Propp Cover photos by courtesy of: Dr. Svenja Papenmeier – AWI Dr. Franz Tauber – IOW Notice 3 Notice This guideline was created under consideration of contributions from the following people: Roland Atzler 10 Dr. Jürgen Knaack 8 Dr. Jan Witt 8 Cordula Berkenbrink 9 Kerstin Kolbe 8 Frank Wolf 5 Tim Bildstein11 Francesco Mascioli 9 Dr.-Ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Sea Levels at Selected Stations on the Baltic Sea Coast*
    doi:10.5697/oc.56-2.259 Extreme sea levels at OCEANOLOGIA, 56 (2), 2014. selected stations on the pp. 259–290. C Copyright by Baltic Sea coast* Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, 2014. KEYWORDS Baltic Sea Extreme sea levels Storm surges and falls Tomasz Wolski1,⋆, Bernard Wiśniewski2 Andrzej Giza1, Halina Kowalewska-Kalkowska1 Hanna Boman3, Silve Grabbi-Kaiv4 Thomas Hammarklint5, Jurgen¨ Holfort6 Zydruneˇ Lydeikaite˙ 7 1 University of Szczecin, Faculty of Geosciences, al. Wojska Polskiego 107/109, 70–483 Szczecin, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] ⋆corresponding author 2 Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Navigation, Wały Chrobrego 1–2, 70–500 Szczecin, Poland 3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palm´enin aukio 1, FI–00101 Helsinki, Finland 4 Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Toompuiestee 24, 10149 Tallinn, Estonia 5 Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Sven K¨allfelts Gata 15, 42471 G¨oteborg, Sweden 6 Bundesamt f¨ur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, Neptunallee 5, 18057 Rostock, Germany 7 Environmental Protection Agency, Taikos pr. 26, LT–91149, Klaipeda, Lithuania Received 25 October 2013, revised 6 February 2014, accepted 11 February 2014. * This work was financed by the Polish National Centre for Science research project No. 2011/01/B/ST10/06470. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 260 T. Wolski, B. Wiśniewski, A. Giza et al. Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse and describe the extreme characteristics of the water levels and illustrate them as the topography of the sea surface along the whole Baltic Sea coast. The general pattern is to show the maxima and minima of Baltic Sea water levels and the extent of their variations in the period from 1960 to 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Ecology of Dunlins Calidris Alpina Staging in the Southern Baltic Sea, 1
    ELSEVIER Journal of Sea Research 42 (1999) 49±64 Feeding ecology of dunlins Calidris alpina staging in the southern Baltic Sea, 1. Habitat use and food selection Volker Dierschke a,Ł, Jan Kube a, Sandra Probst a, Ulrich Brenning b a University of Greifswald, Vogelwarte Hiddensee, Zum Hochland 17, D-18565 Kloster, Germany b Maxim-Gorki-Straûe 4, D-18106 Rostock, Germany Received 24 September 1998; accepted 9 February 1999 Abstract The feeding habits of migrating dunlins Calidris alpina staging in different non-tidal coastal habitats in the southern Baltic Sea are described. The study also focuses on the structure of the benthic macrofauna of these habitats and the diet choice of dunlins. All investigations were carried out on Langenwerder Island (Wismar Bay), where different types of ¯ats and beaches harbour a total of 30 to 40 species of marine macrofauna. The composition of the macrobenthos differed considerably between the eulittoral sandbank, the eulittoral mud¯at, the pebble beach, and the sublittoral surroundings. Most dunlins were observed foraging in ¯ocks of up to several hundred individuals on the eulittoral ¯ats. Densities of up to 20 to 30 foraging dunlins ha1 occurred annually during peak migration in September and October. Macrobenthos biomass in these habitats ¯uctuated between 20 and 40 g AFDM m2. The mean total food consumption of dunlins during autumn migration was estimated at 0.01 g AFDM m2 d1. The predation pressure could be estimated at 3 to 6% of the suitable food supply. Dunlins staging on Langenwerder were able to attain a pre-migratory mass gain of 0.2 to 0.5% of their body weight per day within an 8 to 12-h daily feeding period.
    [Show full text]
  • Eutrophication Status of the Baltic Sea 2007-2011 a Concise Thematic Assessment Published By: HELCOM Katajanokanlaituri 6 B FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 143 Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea 2007-2011 A concise thematic assessment Published by: HELCOM Katajanokanlaituri 6 B FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland www.helcom.fi Editors: Minna Pyhälä1, Vivi Fleming-Lehtinen1 and Maria Laamanen2 Authors: Elżbieta Łysiak-Pastuszak3, Marina Carstens4, Juha-Markku Leppänen5, Wera Leujak6, Günther Nausch7, Ciarán Murray8, Jesper H. Andersen8 1 Secretariat of the Helsinki Commission 2 Ministry of the Environment, Finland 3 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, National Research Institute, Poland 4 State Agency for Environment, Nature Protection and Geology Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany 5 Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE, Finland 6 German Federal Environment Agency, Germany 7 Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (IOW), Germany 8 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited as: HELCOM, 2014. Eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea 2007-2011 - A concise thematic assess- ment. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 143 Information included in this publication or extracts thereof may be cited freely, on the condi- tion that the complete reference for the publication is given as stated above Copyright 2014 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, HELCOM Design and Layout: Leena Närhi, Bitdesign, Vantaa, Finland Photo and credits: Front cover: Cyanobacterial bloom from air plane, Riku Lumiaro /SYKE. Page 5: Bay of Gdansk, Seppo Knuuttila. Page 8: The Dinoflagellate Peridiniella catenata in microscope, Seija Hällfors. Page 9: Water sampling in the Gulf of Finland, Maija Huttunen. Page 14: Kaliningrad, Elena Kuzmina. Page 18: The Quark, Jannica Haldin. Page 23: Pike (Esox Lucius) in Finnish coastal waters, Metsähallitus NHS.
    [Show full text]