DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NPSForm10-900-b (June, 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. New Submission . Amended Submission A, Name of Multiple Property Listing PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each) PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa, 1934 -1941 C. Form Prepared bv____ name/title Marlvs A. Svendsen organization Svendsen Tvler. Inc. Date January 2003 street & number N3834 Deep Lake Road telephone (715)469-3300 city or town Sarona state Wisconsin zip code 54870 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this o«ov««*tatlo« torn * (/ Ib* AttHoMl R*f liter documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional i*o,«lm»o«l//*t forth ! S6 Oft fort 60 «*4 th* J*o(*taif of Ib* Inferior'/ ft«*tfoitf/ ««d feMoli**/ for ifohooloff a«dl NUtorfo f*Nw*nialio«. ([J see continuation sheet for additional comments). ix~^ /-) ^ ' /n r\ r, ft£ef>4. J^fee d^/^> 2003 Signature and title of certifying official ' Date ______STATF HIRTOHiCAL SOCIETY QF IOWA_______________ State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this.multiple property docuf ation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating rented/properties fqr/fisjii/ig in th^lational Re United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Continuation Sheet Section Number Table of Contents Page . PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa. 1934-1941____ Iowa Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Numbers E. Statement of Historic Contexts ............................................................................................................................1 (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) i. Introduction................................................................................_^ ii. Description and Overview of PWA-Era Courthouses in Iowa..............................................................................2 iii. The New Deal Era and the Public Works Administration at the National Level...................................................4 iv. The PWA at Work in Iowa: County Courthouse Building (1934-1941)................................................................8 v. PWA Moderne ..................................................................................................................................................26 vi. Internal Organization of the PWA-Era Courthouse in Iowa ..............................................................................28 vii. PWA Architects in Iowa ...................................................................................................................................32 F. Associated Property Types.................................................................................................................................41 (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements.) i. PropertyType.....................................................................................................................................................^ ii. Descn^tion...................................................................................._^ iii. Significance........................................................................................................................................................42 iv. Registration Requirements........................................ v. Individually Eligible Properties...........................................................................................................................48 G. Geographical Data ...............................................................................................................................................50 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods ........................................................................................50 (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) I. Major Bibliographical References......................................................................................................................53 (List major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or other, specifying repository.) Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for fisting, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Section Number E Page 1 ____PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa. 1934-1941 Iowa Name of Multiple Property Listing State E. Statement of Historic Contexts /. Introduction In 1980 the State Historical Society of Iowa completed a thematic resource nomination for 52 county courthouses in Iowa, built between c. 1850 and 1930. Of this group, 21 courthouses had already been listed in the National Register of Historic Places. According to that nomination, this group included buildings representing architectural styles ranging from Greek Revival to Art Deco/Moderne with most examples from the Romanesque Revival, Neoclassical Revival, and Beau Arts. These buildings were widely distributed across Iowa's 99 counties. In the summer of 2001 the State Historical Society of Iowa retained a consultant to survey and evaluate eleven courthouses built between 1934 and 1952 to determine their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. Marlys Svendsen with Svendsen Tyler, Inc. of Sarona, Wisconsin was hired to complete the survey, prepare an amendment to the previous multiple property nomination or complete a new multiple property documentation form based on a historic context appropriate to the properties surveyed and determined eligible. Individual nominations would then be prepared for eligible courthouses. Photographer Bruce Meyer of Sioux City, Iowa would complete photographic documentation. During the course of the survey, the decision was made to limit the courthouse cover document to those buildings built with federal funding assistance during the New Deal period and one building for which funding was applied but no assistance received. This included ten courthouses built between 1934 and 1941 scattered across Iowa. Historical documentation was also collected for the courthouse erected in Creston in Union County that was erected in 1952, but it was excluded from National Register consideration due to integrity issues and the lack of an historical link with the other ten courthouses. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Continuation Sheet Section Number Page PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa. 1934-1941 Iowa Name of Multiple Property Listing State The map below shows the eleven counties containing courthouses that were documented and evaluated for the courthouse study. Figure 1: Map of Iowa showing eleven counties with courthouses evaluated for National Register eligibility (^Dakota CHy ii. Description and Overview PWA-Era Courthouses in Iowa Ten courthouses were built in Iowa between 1934 and 1941, nine receiving grants to support their construction from the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works, more commonly referred to as the Public Works Administration (PWA). These courthouses were distributed across the state United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Continuation Sheet Section Number E Page 3 ____PWA-Era County Courthouses of Iowa. 1934-1941 Iowa Name of Multiple
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2004  the JUDICIAL COUNCIL of the NINTH CIRCUIT

    Annual Report 2004  the JUDICIAL COUNCIL of the NINTH CIRCUIT

    Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES COURTS 2 0 0 4 A NNU A L R EPO R T The Office of the Circuit Executive would like to acknowledge the following for their contributions to the 2004 Annual Report: Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder Clerk of Court Cathy Catterson Chief Pretrial Services Officer George Walker Chief Probation Officer William Corn Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Clerk Harold Marenus Cover: Detail from wrought iron grillwork enclosing original elevator shafts at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Inside Cover: the Great Hall at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. TABLE OF CONTENTS Ninth Circuit Overview 3 Foreword, Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder 6 An Overview of the Ninth Circuit 7 The Judicial Council and Administration of the Ninth Circuit 8 Judicial Council Organizational Chart 0 Judicial Policy Advisory Groups Judicial Transitions 2 New Judges 5 New Senior Judges 6 Deceased Judges Committees of the Ninth Circuit 8 Circuit Seeks to Improve Juror Experience, Jury Management 20 Public Information and Community Outreach Committee 23 Task Force Seeks Solutions to Pro Se Caseload Issues Space and Security 26 Courts Act to Hold Down Costs for Space and Facilities 27 Seattle Welcomes New Federal Courthouse 28 Work Progresses on Other Projects 29 Courthouse Projects Under Construction, in Design 32 Plans Move Ahead for Los Angeles, San Diego Courthouses Ninth Circuit Highlights 34 Landmark Courthouse Named for Respected Judge 36 Appellate Practice Workshop on Immigration Matters 38 Ninth Circuit Conference Highlights Human Rights 4 Awards Recognize Noted Attorneys, Court Staff 43 Circuit’s Largest District Celebrates Diversity The Work of the Courts in 2004 46 Appellate Filings 49 District Court Filings 52 Bankruptcy Court Filings 55 Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Report 56 Matters Before Magistrate Judges 58 Federal Public Defenders See Caseloads Rise 60 Circuit Probation Caseloads 62 Case Activations by Pretrial Services 64 District Caseloads Annual Report 2004 THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT Front row: Senior District Judge Jack D.
  • Early Settlement 1952 – Major Earthquake Devastates Downtown

    Early Settlement 1952 – Major Earthquake Devastates Downtown

    Early Settlement 1952 – Major earthquake devastates Downtown. Virtually every major structure in the downtown receives damage. 1860’s - Yokut Indians’ first introduction to Europeans. Many landmark buildings are damaged beyond repair. Stepping Bakersfield’s original natural state was an alkali delta 1953-1975 – Period of tremendous growth and expansion. consisting mainly of grasses, cottonwood, and oak trees. City triples in size adding over 15,400 acres to its Animals such as deer, antelope, elk and bear roamed the boundaries. land. 1975 and beyond – Growth continues. into 1770’s - Don Pedro Fages first white man arrives. Padre Fray Francisco Garces arrives with a group of Indian companions. Bakersfield Historic Preservation Commission 1863 - Colonel Thomas Baker purchases swamp and the overflow lands and constructs irrigation ditches damming The Commission seeks to increase public awareness of Buena Vista Lake. Baker provides plants and irrigates historic properties by promoting their identification, crops, harnesses water power, provides building sites, and protection, enhancement, and perpetuation. Historic items installs a sawmill and a do-it-yourself grist mill for grinding can be buildings, structures, signs, objects, features, sites, Past grain. Colonel Baker’s greatest ambition was to make land places and areas that reflect special elements of the City’s a historic walking tour available for ownership. Baker disliked small streets and architectural, artistic, cultural, engineering, aesthetic, of downtown developed a classical grid pattern designating 82.5 feet for historical, political, social and other heritage. A description Bakersfield street widths and 115 feet for avenues, seen in Downtown of the Commission’s functions can be found in the Bakersfield today.
  • Mid-Century Modernism Historic Context

    Mid-Century Modernism Historic Context

    mid-century Modernism Historic Context September 2008 Prepared for the City of Fresno Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Prepared by Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno, CA 93721 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context mid-century Modernism, Fresno Historical Context Prepared For City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department Prepared By Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno CA, 93721 Project Team Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 Broadway Street Fresno, CA 93721 Lauren MacDonald, Architectural Historian Lauren MacDonald meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications in Architectural History and History Acknowledgements Research efforts were aided by contributions of the following individuals and organizations: City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Manager Fresno County Public Library, California History and Genealogy Room William Secrest, Librarian Fresno Historical Society Maria Ortiz, Archivist / Librarian Jill Moffat, Executive Director John Edward Powell Eldon Daitweiler, Fresno Modern American Institute of Architects, San Joaquin Chapter William Stevens, AIA Les Traeger, AIA Bob Dyer, AIA Robin Gay McCline, AIA Jim Oakes, AIA Martin Temple, AIA Edwin S. Darden, FAIA William Patnaude, AIA Hal Tokmakian Steve Weil 1 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
  • Lasc to Open Courtrooms April 16 at Historic Spring Street Federal Courthouse in Downtown Los Angeles

    Lasc to Open Courtrooms April 16 at Historic Spring Street Federal Courthouse in Downtown Los Angeles

    Los Angeles Superior Court – Public Information Office 111 N. Hill Street, Room 107, Los Angeles, CA 90012 [email protected] www.lacourt.org NEWS RELEASE March 8, 2018 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE LASC TO OPEN COURTROOMS APRIL 16 AT HISTORIC SPRING STREET FEDERAL COURTHOUSE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES The Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC) has announced that the complex civil litigation program located at Central Civil West (CCW) Courthouse and some civil courtrooms at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse will relocate to the historic Spring Street Federal Courthouse, located at 312 N. Spring St., Los Angeles, in mid-April, with hearings set to begin April 16. Designed by Gilbert Stanley Underwood and Louis A. Simon as a major example of Art Moderne architecture, the Spring Street Courthouse was completed in 1940 and originally served as both a courthouse and post office. It was the third federal building constructed in Los Angeles to serve its rapidly growing population in the early twentieth century. Since the mid-1960s, it has functioned solely as a courthouse, most recently for judges from the United States District Court, Central District of California before their relocation in 2016 to the new First Street Federal Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles. “Relocating to the Spring Street Courthouse will enable us to expand access to justice,” said LASC Presiding Judge Daniel J. Buckley. “LASC is honored to help preserve this national historic landmark as a place for the administration of justice.” Savings from the relocation of the complex litigation program will offset much of the costs of the Spring Street Courthouse lease, providing opportunities for expanding courtrooms without additional cost.
  • A Guide to Historic Santa Monica City Hall

    A Guide to Historic Santa Monica City Hall

    A G U I D E T O Historic Santa Monica City Hall The city seal, measuring 79 inches in diameter, was created with the same “Petrachrome” method and a palette of colors, textures and elements similar to those used in the Macdonald-Wright murals. Encircled by the words, “City of Santa Monica, California. Founded 1875,” the seal features a mermaid and Spanish galleon on the bay, with sun, mountains, clouds and airplanes behind. A ribbon near the base of the seal carries the city’s motto, Populus Felix en Urbe Felice, translated from the Latin as “Fortunate People in a Fortunate Land.” The seal is inlaid in the center of the foyer floor, surrounded by color tiles that run along the east-west axis of the foyer and halls. A serrated pattern of yellow triangles running against a brown field, bordered by black stripes, echoes the chevron pattern on the tiled wainscoting found nearby. T he Overview With a nautical quality befitting its seaside locale, Santa Monica City Hall reflects the character of its surroundings, making it a civic building truly connected to its constituency. Designed by two prominent Los Angeles architects, it is rec- ognized as an outstanding example of the Public Works Administration (PWA) Moderne style of architecture popularized by Depression-era architects. With original Gladding, McBean ceramic tiles found around the west entrance doorway and throughout the building, and historic Stanton Macdonald-Wright murals in the entry foyer that document the city’s and the state’s history, the building’s architecture has earned it a place in the California Register of Historical Resources (1996), designation as a city landmark and eligibility for listing in the federal Register of Historic Places.
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    E-Served: Jan 21 2020 9:18AM PST Via Case Anywhere 1 David M. deRubertis, State Bar No. 208709 The deRubertis Law Firm, APC 2 4219 Coldwater Canyon Avenue Studio City, California 91604 3 Telephone:(818) 761-2322 Facsimile: (818) 761-2323 4 E-mail: [email protected] 5 Lee R. Feldman, State Bar No. 171628 Alicia Olivares, State Bar No. 181412 6 FELDMAN BROWNE OLIVARES A Professional Corporation 7 12400 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California 90025 8 Telephone:(310) 207-8500 Facsimile: (310) 207-8515 9 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 Danessa Valentine & Jalisa Moore 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 14 DANESSA VALENTINE, an individual; Case No.: BC602184 15 JALISA MOORE, an individual; and all [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Carolyn B. others similarly situated, Kuhl, Department 12] 16 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF DAVID M. deRUBERTIS 17 IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINAL v. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 18 SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND 19 entity; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, COSTS 20 Defendants. Date: February 13, 2020 Time: 10:00 a.m. 21 Dept.: 12 22 Complaint filed: November 24, 2015 Trial: NONE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 DECL OF DAVID M. DERUBERTIS ISO MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS 1 DECLARATION OF DAVID M. deRUBERTIS, ESQ.: 2 I, David M.
  • Attachment-G

    Attachment-G

    ATTACHMENT G: List of California Superior Courts Handbook for Challenging Mental Health Conservatorships, Publication #5110.01 36 Alameda County Superior Court René C. Davidson Courthouse 1225 Fallon Street Oakland, California 94612 1221 Oak Street, 3rd and 4th Floors Oakland, California 94612 Hayward Hall of Justice 24405 Amador Street Hayward, CA 94544 Mental Health Division John George Psychiatric Pavilion 2060 Fairmont Drive San Leandro, CA 94578 Alpine County Superior Court 777 State Route 89 P.O. Box 518 Markleeville, CA 96120 Amador County Superior Court 500 Argonaut Lane Jackson, CA 95642 Butte County Superior Court: Civil Division Chico - North Butte County Courthouse 1775 Concord Avenue Chico, CA 95928 Oroville - Butte County Courthouse One Court Street Oroville, CA 95965 Calveras County Superior Court: Civil Division 400 Government Center Drive, San Andreas, CA 95249-9794 Colusa County Superior Court: Civil Division 532 Oak Street Colusa, CA 95932 Handbook for Challenging Mental Health Conservatorships, Publication #5110.01 37 Contra Costa County Superior Court Wakefield Taylor Courthouse 725 Court Street Martinez, CA 94553 Richmond Courthouse 100 – 37th Street Richmond, CA 94805 Pittsburgh Courthouse 1000 Center Drive Pittsburg, CA 94565 Del Norte County Superior Court Main Courthouse 450 H Street Crescent City, CA 95531 El Dorado County Superior Court Placerville Main Street Branch 495 Main Street Placerville, CA 95667 Cameron Park Branch 3321 Cameron Park Drive Cameron Park, CA 95682 South Lake Tahoe Branch 1354 Johnson Blvd. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Mental Health Placerville Fair Lane Branch 295 Fair Lane Placerville, CA 95667 Fresno County Superior Court B. F. Sisk Courthouse 1130 O Street Fresno, CA 93721-2220 Handbook for Challenging Mental Health Conservatorships, Publication #5110.01 38 Glenn County Superior Court 526 W Sycamore St Willows, CA 95988 Orlando Courthouse 821 E.
  • Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent

    Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent

    No. S264419 Exempt from Filing Fee Govt. Code §6103 (2nd Civil No. B306827) (Los Angeles Sup.Crt. Nos. JCCP4674/19STCV36610) In The Supreme Court State of California Barbara Franklin, Petitioner, v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent. ____________________ Daimler Trucks North America LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest. ANSWER TO PETITION FOR REVIEW After a Summary Denial of a Petition for Peremptory Writ by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One Douglas J. Collodel (Bar No. 112797) [email protected] CLYDE & CO US LLP 355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Document received by the CA Supreme Court. Telephone: 213.358.7600 Facsimile: 213.358.7650 Attorneys for Respondent, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Table of Contents Page(s) Table of Contents ..............................................................................2 Table of Authorities ..........................................................................4 Preliminary Statement .....................................................................8 Factual Background ....................................................................... 13 I. What are the specific circumstances justifying the order? .................................................................................... 14 A. The Scale of Respondent’s Operations ...................... 15 B. Court Personnel Affected by the COVID-19 Crisis ........................................................................... 16 II. Is the use
  • GAO-08-889 Federal Courthouse Construction

    GAO-08-889 Federal Courthouse Construction

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO September 2008 FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION Estimated Costs to House the L.A. District Court Have Tripled and There Is No Consensus on How to Proceed GAO-08-889 September 2008 FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION Accountability Integrity Reliability Estimated Costs to House the L.A. District Court Have Highlights Tripled and There Is No Consensus on How to Highlights of GAO-08-889, a report to Proceed congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since the early 1990s, the General GSA initially estimated in 2000 that the L.A. Court could take occupancy of a Services Administration (GSA) and new courthouse in fiscal year 2006, but occupancy has been delayed by 8 the federal judiciary (judiciary) years to fiscal year 2014 at the earliest. GSA has spent $16.3 million designing have been carrying out a a new courthouse and $16.9 million acquiring and preparing a new site for it in multibillion-dollar courthouse downtown Los Angeles. Since no construction has occurred, about $366.45 construction initiative. In downtown Los Angeles, California, million remains appropriated for the construction of a 41-courtroom L.A. one of the nation’s busiest federal Courthouse. Project delays were caused by GSA’s decision to design a larger district courts (L.A. Court), the courthouse than what was authorized by Congress, slow decision making by federal judiciary has split its GSA and the judiciary to reduce scope and stay on budget, unforeseen cost district, magistrate, and bankruptcy escalations, and low contractor interest that caused GSA to cancel the entire judges between two buildings—the 41-courtroom courthouse project.
  • Responses to Comments on The

    Responses to Comments on The

    CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department
  • The Stanislaus County Hall of Records: Modesto’S Monument to Modern Architecture

    The Stanislaus County Hall of Records: Modesto’S Monument to Modern Architecture

    1 The Stanislaus County Hall of Records: Modesto’s Monument to Modern Architecture Submitted September 13, 2017 by Benjamin Jameson-Ellsmore, assistant architecture curator, Modesto Art Museum and PhD. student in art and architectural history, UC Santa Barbara. Reviewed by Bob Barzan. The Stanislaus County Hall of Records by Russell Guerne DeLappe, Modesto, California. Photograph by author. 2 Summary Stanislaus County Hall of Records Construction began in 1938, completed in 1939 Additions began in 1949, completed in 1950 Address: 1100 I St., Modesto, California Architect: Russell Guerne DeLappe Structural Engineer: H. J. Brunnier Mechanical Engineering: Arthur H. Memmler General Contractor: Dinwiddie Construction Co. State Facility Number: 50-A2 Style/Period: International Style, depression era Status: Building is in use as a Family Law office, clerk’s office, contains improvised courtrooms, vulnerable site, the completion of new courthouse on G, H, 9th and 10th Streets puts it at risk, good candidate for rehabilitation, third and fourth floors currently unoccupied and used as storage Condition: exterior is in very good condition, basement and first floor occupied daily, current improvised facilities are inadequate for courtroom use Occupancy: Joint occupancy by Stanislaus County and State of California Floors: Four floors plus basement level and roof penthouse Materials: Reinforced concrete, steel and glass Square Footage: 45,343 3 Contents Introduction: Behind the Leaves on I Street ……………………………………………………………………… 3 1. The Hall of Records
  • New Web Feature Showcases Conservancy Conservation

    New Web Feature Showcases Conservancy Conservation

    Volume 33 J u l a u g 2 0 1 1 Number 4 Local State Historic Parks on Closure List by Adrian Scott Fine On May 12, the Conservancy honored the Antelope Valley Indian Museum State Historic Park with a 2011 Preservation Award for its outstanding preservation and recent reopening. Imagine our surprise the very next day, when the museum appeared on California State Parks’ list of parks it plans to permanently close due to the state budget crisis. The list of seventy parks includes five in Los Angeles County (four of which are designated as historic) and forty percent of LEFT: The Conservancy obtained an easement in 1985 from developer Wayne Ratkovich for the 1931 Pellissier Building and Wiltern Theatre. Photo from L.A. Conservancy archives. RIGHT: The Conservancy also holds all state historic parks in California. an easement protecting the original exterior, interior, and landscape features of the Joseph Residence and Stabilizing and restoring the Antelope Apartments, built between 1946 and 1970. Photo by Dean Cheng. Valley Indian Museum building took nearly a decade of planning, two years of construction New Web Feature Showcases (including a temporary delay due to the loss of funding), and $1.4 million. In addition to the irony of the timing, closing the museum after Conservancy Conservation Easements investing so much time, effort, and money by Adrian Scott Fine would squander these resources as well as Saving historic places rarely takes a one-size-fits-all approach; the Conservancy most our heritage. often applies a different set of tools and strategies in each case.