Migration Action
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Report on the Erosion of Press Freedom in Australia
BREAKING: A report on the erosion of press freedom in Australia REPORT WRITTEN BY: SCOTT LUDLAM AND DAVID PARIS Press Freedom in Australia 2 Our Right to a Free Press 3 Law Enforcement and Intelligence Powers 4 Surveillance 7 Detention of Australian Journalists and Publishers 10 Freedom of Information 11 CONTENTS Defamation Law 12 The Australian Media Market 13 ABC at Risk 14 Fair and Balanced Legislation Proposal 15 How Does Australia Compare Internationally? 16 What Can We Do? 17 A Media Freedom Act 18 About the Authors: David Paris and Scott Ludlam 19 References 20 1 PRESS FREEDOM IN AUSTRALIA “Freedom of information journalists working on national is the freedom that allows security issues, and the privacy of the Australian public. Australians you to verify the existence are now among the most heavily of all the other freedoms.” surveilled populations in the world. - Win Tin, Burmese journalist. Law enforcement agencies can access extraordinary amounts In June 2019, the Australian of information with scant Federal Police raided the ABC and judicial oversight, and additional the home of a journalist from the safeguards for journalists within Daily Telegraph. These alarming these regimes are narrowly raids were undertaken because framed and routinely bypassed. of journalists doing their jobs reporting on national security Australia already lagged behind issues in the public interest, in when it comes to press freedom. part enabled by whistleblowers We are the only democracy on inside government agencies. the planet that has not enshrined the right to a free press in our This was just the latest step in constitution or a charter or bill what has been a steady erosion of rights. -
Special Investigation Premieres Sunday 2 May at 8Pm AEST
MEDIA RELEASE: Monday April 19, 2021 Special Investigation Premieres Sunday 2 May at 8pm AEST WATCH PROMO HERE Sky News Australia presents an important special investigation, Men In The Mirror: Rudd & Turnbull. Presented by Sky News Host and The Australian’s Associate Editor Chris Kenny, the one-hour special investigation examines the extraordinary parallel lives of two former Australian Prime Ministers – Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull. Once enemies and aggressive rivals, Rudd and Turnbull saw each other as the main barrier to each other’s destiny, as their naked ambitions defined one of the most turbulent times in Australian politics. Now, they're united in bitterness as the most unlikely of allies. They have thrust themselves back into the spotlight with an extraordinary campaign to try to save their legacies, by shifting the blame of their demise onto the media, in particular News Corp media organisations. Sky News investigates the real story behind their success and ultimate failures. A former chief of staff to Malcolm Turnbull, Chris Kenny explores every aspect of the former Prime Ministers’ lives, probing the shared narrative that binds the two. From boys suffering loss to leaders of their country, they were both shaped by childhood trauma, rose rapidly in brilliant pre-politics careers, and married strong women before leading their parties and their nation. They shaped a tumultuous period that might have forever changed Australia’s political paradigm. The documentary hears from people who know these men well and have seen them in close quarters. Interviewees include Kevin Rudd’s brother and Canberra lobbyist, Greg Rudd, former Labor party leader Mark Latham, former Liberal party minister Sharman Stone, former QLD Premier Peter Beattie, political commentator Tom Switzer, former Liberal senator Nick Minchin, veteran cartoonist Warren Brown, former editor in chief of The Australian Chris Mitchell and Sky News Anchor and former Turnbull staffer Peta Credlin. -
Introduction
A submission to The Environment and Communications References Committee Inquiry into Media Diversity in Australia from The Centre for Advancing Journalism The University of Melbourne Authors: Denis Muller, Andrew Dodd, Jo Chandler, Louisa Lim, Brad Buller Introduction We thank the Environment and Communications References Committee for the opportunity to make a submission to this inquiry into media diversity in Australia. It is a topic of great importance to every citizen of Australia and one that is central to the mission of the Centre for Advancing Journalism. Media diversity both reflects and engenders a healthy democracy. Without pluralism in ownership and content, both the media and the society it serves are diminished. This submission addresses several of the terms of reference of the inquiry, namely the two closely connected themes of media diversity and independence, and their impacts on both public interest journalism and democracy. It also specifically addresses the following aims: (a) the current state of public interest journalism in Australia and any barriers to Australian voters’ ability to access reliable, accurate and independent news; (b) the effect of media concentration on democracy in Australia; (c) the impact of Australia’s media ownership laws on media concentration in Australia; (d) the impact of significant changes to media business models since the advent of online news and the barriers to viability and profitability of public interest news services; (e) the impact of online global platforms such as Facebook, Google and Twitter on the media industry and sharing of news in Australia; (f) the barriers faced by small, independent and community news outlets in Australia; (g) the role that a newswire service plays in supporting diverse public interest journalism in Australia; (h) the state of local, regional and rural media outlets in Australia; (i) the role of government in supporting a viable and diverse public interest journalism sector in Australia; and 1 (j) any other related matters. -
Budget 2021 Live on Sky News
MEDIA RELEASE: Friday 7 May 2021 BUDGET 2021 LIVE ON SKY NEWS TUESDAY 11 MAY Ahead of Tuesday’s Budget Speech, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg joins Chief News Anchor Kieran Gilbert on Sunday Agenda, 8am AEST WATCH PROMO Sky News will feature Australia’s most experienced political reporters and business experts to deliver live coverage and analysis of Budget 2021. With Treasurer Josh Frydenberg expected to deliver a substantially improved economic outlook, Sky News will provide viewers with all the details on what the announcement means for the Australian economy and its residents. Comprehensive coverage begins this Sunday 9 May at 8am when Treasurer Josh Frydenberg joins Chief News Anchor Kieran Gilbert on Sunday Agenda for a wide-ranging interview. Ahead of what could be his make-or-break Budget, the Treasurer has granted Sky News unprecedented access to his family at home in Melbourne, providing a revealing portrait of one of the nation’s most powerful figures. Former Prime Minister John Howard also joins the program for his insight into Josh Frydenberg’s Budget blueprint and political ascendancy. Then on Tuesday 11 May, the countdown to the Treasurer’s Budget address begins at 5:30am with Peter Stefanovic on First Edition. From 9:00am, Laura Jayes will be joined by leading economists to discuss the potential market and economic impact of the Government’s package during AM Agenda. At 11:00am join Tom Connell and then Ashleigh Gillon on NewsDay for the latest predictions from politicians, pundits and policymakers. Then at 2:00pm Sky News will cross to live coverage of Question Time during Parliament Live from the House of Representatives in Canberra. -
Debunking Dreyfus on Free Speech and Freedom
Disclaimer : Nothing in this letter should be construed as threatening nor advocating unlawful acts. Suspects are innocent until the facts against them are proven and convicted in a court of justice. This does not discuss the contents of the current super-injunction. Debunking Dreyfus on Free Speech and Freedom Author: Brendan Jones Brisbane, QLD, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Being an Open Letter to ALP Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus MP QC regarding his speech to the HRC Free Speech 2014 Symposium Cc: Director-General of Security – ASIO, David Irvine (pp. 62-65) Online at: http://victimsofdsto.com/debunking-drefyus/ Page 1 of 66(218) September 10(11), 2014 NoFibs Journalist: “I’m a strong free speech advocate ... So I’m thrilled that shadow Attorney General Mark Dreyfus QC has taken a stand and wish him success in the long hard climb ahead.” 98 Brendan Jones: “Mr. Dreyfus is no advocate for free speech, but the fact that he has convinced you he is – and in just one short speech – has persuaded me he’s a first class barrister.” 98 Journalist Martin Hirst: “I loved that he rubbed their pretty little noses in it. He made the point strongly that the so-called “marketplace of ideas” is a conservative myth that bears little relation to reality.” 98 133 Brendan Jones: “All Dreyfus did was say he rejected it. He never explained why. Google "Sophistry"” 98 131 US Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo: ‘Freedom of expression is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom.’ US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis: “Those who won our independence believed that the final end of the State was to make men free to develop their faculties, and that in its government the deliberative forces should prevail over the arbitrary. -
Aunty out of Control the ABC Is a Billion Dollar Culture War High Ground, Writes James Paterson
R THE ABC Volume 66 I 1 Aunty out of control The ABC is a billion dollar culture war high ground, writes James Paterson. It’s time it was privatised. British newspaper The Guardian to April, ABC managing director Mark JAMES PATERSON Director of Development and report allegations based on leaks by Scott was forced to acknowledge the Communications at the Edward Snowden, the former US NSA appalling taste of the Chaser skit and Institute of Public Affairs employee, that Australia spied on the relented, granting the apology Kenny Indonesian government. had been seeking. here’s only one way to fix Second, the ABC chose to Third, the ABC chose to air thinly- the ABC, and that is by broadcast a distasteful photoshopped sourced allegations that Australian privatising it. Everything else image of ABC critic and journalist Navy personnel had deliberately is window dressing. at The Australian, Chris Kenny, burned asylum seekers’ hands in a TIf the ABC wants to be reformed, appearing to have sex with a dog. confrontation at sea. Even the ABC’s they are doing everything in their The attack came in response to own Media Watch, normally focused power to make it happen. Kenny’s persistent criticism of the on the evils of talk back radio and Since the election of the Abbott ABC. Instead of simply apologising, commercial current affairs shows, government, it is almost as if the ABC as Kenny requested, the ABC was forced to admit the reporting was has gone out of its way to provoke initially refused and instead spent sloppy and questionable. -
The Rudd/Gillard Government, Asylum Seekers, and the Politics of Norm
The Rudd/Gillard Government, Asylum Seekers, and the Politics of Norm Contestation Katja Cooper B Arts (International Relations)/B Laws (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Political Science and International Relations (POLSIS) i Abstract This thesis examines the important role that humanitarian arguments played in influencing the trajectory of Australia’s asylum seeker policy during the Prime Ministerships of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard (2007 – 2013). In the leadup to the 2007 Federal Election, Rudd declared that Australia had a moral obligation to treat asylum seekers with compassion because the ‘biblical injunction to care for the stranger in our midst is clear.’ During his first year in office, Rudd largely fulfilled his promise to comply with the ‘letter and the spirit’ of the Refugee Convention by ending offshore detention on Nauru and Manus Island, abolishing Temporary Protection Visas (TPVs), and declaring that mandatory detention would only be used as a ‘last resort.’ However, by 2013, Labor’s humanitarian platform on Irregular Maritime Arrivals (IMAs) had been largely abandoned. Faced with a significant increase in boat arrivals, an overburdened immigration detention system and an increasingly hostile public, both Rudd and his successor Gillard responded by gradually reintroducing the punitive measures that had comprised the Howard Government’s Pacific Solution. In order to ascertain why Rudd’s attempt to take Australia’s asylum seeker policy in a more humanitarian direction was unable to be sustained, I will undertake a normative analysis of the language that both Labor and the Coalition used in order to legitimate their respective asylum seeker policies during the Rudd/Gillard era. -
It Is the Knight to Call It a Day on Peta Credlin
It is the knight to call it a day on Peta Credlin MIRANDA DEVINE THE DAILY TELEGRAPH JANUARY 28, 2015 12:00AM TONY Abbott’s gonging of Prince Philip makes no political sense. It shows Gillardesque poor judgement. Honestly. In one neat image the wacky self-indulgence crystallises all the disquiet about the Prime Minister since he took office 16 months ago. And it raises the big question of why someone in his army of advisers didn’t save him from himself. At least Abbott’s poor judgment calls don’t cost the nation billions of dollars, or kill people, as did the blunders of his predecessors Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard. But the universal condemnation of his “captain’s call” of an Australia Day knighthood for the Queen’s husband might finally be the jolt that makes the Prime Minister realise he is facing an existential political challenge. PAUL TOOHEY: IS IT TIME FOR ABBOTT TO GO? EDITORIAL: ABBOTT IS DISTRACTED FROM THE MAIN GAME When we’re still in January of the year in which he was supposed to have pushed the reset button, and there are rumbles from his party about changing leaders, you know there’s a problem. The Liberals would be nuts to move on Abbott, but they know the mood in their heartland is black. Even monarchists are appalled that he has managed to breathe life back into the dormant republic cause. It raises the big question of why someone in his army of advisers didn’t save him from himself. All summer at dinner parties and BBQs across Sydney, Abbott supporters have been talking with increasing dismay about his leadership style, indecision, backdowns, lack of strategy, tin ear, and the way his office micromanages and over-thinks everything. -
Political Economy and Discourse in Murdoch's Flagship Newspaper, The
The Political Economy of Communication 4(2), 3–17 © The Author 2016 http://www.polecom.org Political economy and discourse in Murdoch’s flagship newspaper, The Australian John Sinclair, University of Melbourne Keywords: Rupert Murdoch, The Australian, proprietorial influence, elite discourse, political correctness Abstract The Australian is News Corporation’s flagship newspaper in Australia. The only truly national, general daily, The Australian demands that it be taken seriously, not only as a ‘newspaper of record’, but as an actor in the business, politics and culture of the nation. Established by Rupert Murdoch in 1964, The Australian is widely understood to be his vehicle of influence, but more than that, it may serve as a case study of how his proprietorial influence is mediated in practice. The political economy of The Australian is striking in that it is not a profitable operation, and although it serves to cross-promote other interests of News Corp Australia, the paper appears to exist principally for the purpose of exerting its overt ideological agenda. An implicit assumption in the political economy literature is that ownership entails control, but there are rare opportunities to examine just how this is mediated. However, the chance to research this issue came at the end of 2015, with the retirement of Chris Mitchell, the longest-serving editor-in- chief of The Australian, and the subsequent publication of his memoir in 2016. The present study shows that in addition to the predictable neoliberal agenda of the Murdoch-owned media evident in the US and UK, The Australian under Mitchell’s direction pursued campaigns of its own. -
Heritage Politics in Adelaide During the Bannon Decade
r¡ls lor HERITAGE POLITICS IN ADELAIDE DURING THE BANNON DECADE Sharon Ann Mosler Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in HistorY School of History and Politics University of Adelaide December 2006 il TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 111 ABSTRACT 1V DECLARATION vl ACKNOV/LEDGEMENTS vll LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .. vlll CHRONOLOGY... .X 1 INTRODUCTION ..1 2 TH.E AUSTRALIAN L^Boy'r.PARTY DURING THE BANNON DECADE t3a 3 rHE tr*Ëft{t{#""cRAcY ¡qÀ 4 THE ROLE OF THE ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL 75 5 TOV/NSCAPE PROTECTION TO LOCAL HERITAGE .."............. ... 108 6 THE INTEREST GROUPS ... 135 7 CASE STUDIES IN HERITAGE POLITICS: MAJOR PROJECTS 178 8 CASE STUDIES IN HERITAGE POLITICS: SMALL PROJECTS 210 9 CONCLUSION 232 APPENDICES ... 244 BIBLIOGRAPHY 254 111 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS City of Adelaide Map xiv Bertram House, Grenfell Street 88 Edmund'Wright House, King William Street 153 Aurora Hotel, Hindmarsh Square 159 Commonwealth Bank, Currie Street 165 REMM-Myer project, North Terrace 194 East End Market, East Terrace 198 'Working'Women's Creche, Gouger Street 205 Kingsmead and Belmont House, Brougham Place, North Adelaide 2tt St Paul's Church, Pulteney Street 2t7 Somerset Hotel, Pulteney Street 220 'House of Chow' building, Hutt Street 223 Gawler Chambers, North Terrace 227 tv ABSTRACT This thesis argues that during the decade 1983-93 South Australia's heritage legislation was not effective in protecting Adelaide's traditional built character. The Bannon government was committed to growth through major developments during an economic recession, and many of those developments entailed at least the partial demolition of heritage-listed buildings. -
UPHOLDING the AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
UPHOLDING the AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION Volume 29 Proceedings of the 29th Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society Novotel Perth Langley 221 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 25-27 August 2017 2018 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Published 2018 by The Samuel Griffith Society PO Box 13076, Law Courts VICTORIA 8010 World Wide Web Address: http://www.samuelgriffith.org.au Printed by: McPherson’s Printing Pty Ltd 76 Nelson Street, Maryborough, Vic 3465 National Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume 29 Proceedings of The Samuel Griffith Society ISSN 1327-1539 ii Contents Introduction Eddy Gisonda v The Zeitgeist and the Constitution The 2017 Sir Harry Gibbs Memorial Oration The Honourable P. A. Keane ix 1. Fake News, Federalism and the Love Media Chris Kenny 1 2. The Unconstitutionality of Outlawing Political Opinion Augusto Zimmermann 17 3. Government not Gridlock Tony Abbott 49 4. In Defence of the Senate James Paterson 57 5. Western Australia and the GST Mike Nahan 69 6. Western Australia and Secession David Leyonhjelm 79 iii 7. Workplace Rights and the States Daniel White 89 8. Causes of Coming Discontents: The European Union as a Role Model for Australia? Neville Rochow 103 9. Federalism and the High Court in the 21 st Century The Honourable Robert Mitchell 181 10. Federalism and the Principle of Subsidiarity Michelle Evans 201 11. Passing the Buck The Honourable Wayne Martin 227 12. The Aboriginal Question: Enough is Enough! John Stone 273 13. A Colour-blind Constitution Keith Wolahan 319 14. Recognition Roulette The Honourable Nicholas Hasluck 337 Contributors 355 iv Introduction Eddy Gisonda The Samuel Griffith Society held its 29 th Conference on the weekend of 25 to 27 August 2017, in the city of Perth, Western Australia. -
Israel Flies Emirates
AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL REVIEW VOLUME 45 No. 9 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL & JEWISH AFFAIRS COUNCIL ISRAEL FLIES EMIRATES The dramatic implications for the whole Middle East of the UAE- Israel normalisation deal ISRAEL ENERGISED “ABJECT FILTH” SNAPBACK ATTACK ALMS FOR TERRORISTS? How gas production is providing the The battle to contain US move sees the Holocaust denial on UN Security Council Stopping charitable Jewish state with new diplomatic and social media ...PAGE 40 debating the zombie donations from serv- strategic opportunities ................. PAGE 20 nuclear agreement ing the aims of violent with Iran ........PAGE 24 extremists ...... PAGE 28 NAME OF SECTION 311 HEALESVILLE – YARRA GLEN ROAD, YARRA GLEN, VIC 3775 +61 3 5962 3311 WWW.TARRAWARRA.COM.AU With Compliments from P O BOX 400 SOUTH MELBOURNE, 3205, AUSTRALIA TELEPHONE: (03) 9695 8700 2 AIR – September 2020 AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL VOLUME 45 No. 9 REVIEW SEPTEMBER 2020 EDITOR’S NOTE NAME OF SECTION his AIR edition’s cover story looks at the implications of the dramatic and unexpected ON THE COVER Tannouncement on Aug. 13 of plans for the normalisation of diplomatic relations On Aug. 13, 2020, Tel Aviv City between Israel and the United Arab Emirates. Hall was lit up with the flag of Amotz Asa-El looks at why the UAE normalisation deal is so widely seen as an im- the United Arab Emirates as portant breakthrough in Israel, strategic affairs reporter Yaakov Lappin explores its im- the UAE and Israel announced plications for the wider Middle East, while Israeli columnist Haviv Rettig Gur explains they would be establishing full why the Palestinian reaction to the deal has been so vehement and what the Palestinian diplomatic ties.