DOCSLIB.ORG

The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Increasing Enterprises

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Increasing Enterprises For: Application The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Development & Delivery Increasing Enterprises’ Choices Professionals by Noel Yuhanna, June 7, 2013 KEY TAKEAWAYS Information Management Challenges Create New Database Market Opportunities Data volume, data velocity, mobility, cloud, globalization, and increased compliance requirements demand new features, functionality, and innovation. A recent Forrester survey found that performance, integration, security, unpredictable workloads, and high availability are companies’ top data management challenges. Look Beyond Traditional Database Solutions And Architectures The database market is transforming. Relational DBs are OK for established OLTP and decision support apps, but new business requirements, dynamic workloads, globalization, and cost-cutting mean that firms need a new database strategy. Devs facing issues with existing DB implementations or designing new web-scale apps should look beyond relational. Invest In New Database Technologies To Succeed Business data comprises an increasing share of the value of your systems. Past investments in relational DBs are a solid basis, but you need more to stay competitive amid the many innovative new ways to use information. Next-gen DB strategies require you to invest anew so you can deliver the speed, agility, and insights critical to business growth. Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA Tel: +1 617.613.6000 | Fax: +1 617.613.5000 | www.forrester.com FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS JUNE 7, 2013 The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Increasing Enterprises’ Choices An Overview Of The Enterprise Database Management System Market In 2013 by Noel Yuhanna with Mike Gilpin and Vivian Brown WHY READ THIS REPort Business demand for more applications, larger databases, and new analytics initiatives is driving innovation and growth in the database market, with new options for cloud, in-memory, mobility, predictive analytics, and real-time data management. Application development and delivery (AD&D) professionals have more database choices than ever, from relational to NoSQL and other specialized databases, enabling ever more sophisticated applications. Business requirements for more speed, agility, and business insight are driving AD&D pros to innovate with new database technology. Although IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and Teradata control about 80% of the market, other large vendors and startups, including 10gen, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Basho Technologies, Couchbase, Clustrix, DataStax, EnterpriseDB, MarkLogic, MemSQL, Neo Technology, salesforce.com, SAP, and VoltDB, are threatening established database providers by offering new approaches and innovative solutions. This market overview enumerates and analyzes these database choices to inform your database technology strategy. Table Of Contents Notes & Resources 2 Database Demand Is Growing To Support Forrester based this research on dozens of New Business Requirements interviews with end user firms, technology vendors, and third-party research from 4 The Database Market Is Expanding Beyond academic journals and other published works. RDBMS And DW Forrester also fielded hundreds of inquiries 12 Vendor Landscape: Database Management on data management topics from clients. Systems Related Research Documents RECOMMENDATIONS 19 Invest In New Database Technologies To The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Cloud Succeed Databases, Q4 2012 November 8, 2012 WHAT IT MEANS Craft Your Future State BI Reference 20 Look Beyond Traditional Database Solutions Architecture And Architectures November 1, 2012 The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Data Warehousing, Q1 2011 February 10, 2011 © 2013, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, TechRadar, and Total Economic Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. To purchase reprints of this document, please email [email protected]. For additional information, go to www.forrester.com. FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Increasing Enterprises’ Choices 2 DATABASE DEMAND IS GROWING TO SUPPORT NEW BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS Every company depends on data to support virtually every function of its business, including marketing, sales, product design and development, customer experience, and finance. Databases play a critical role in storing, processing, and accessing such data to support business applications and users. Thanks to the Internet, packaged applications, mobile platforms, public and cloud applications, and sensor data, there’s more data now than ever, and some of it gets stored in databases. In addition, new business applications are demanding faster access to information, better support for unstructured or semistructured data, and access to real-time data. Databases remain central to these trends. Newly emerging data management requirements demand more flexible data models, more scalable architectures, and faster time-to-value. Information Management Challenges Are Creating New Market Opportunities Explosive growth in the volume and velocity of data — coupled with globalization, mobility, cloud, and increased compliance requirements — are bringing new information management challenges to the enterprise. Many of these challenges are new and require innovative approaches and solutions. Forrester recently fielded its February 2013 Global Database Management Online Survey across a range of industries to investigate database usage and challenges; we found that the top data management challenges are: ■ Delivering improved performance. Enterprises have always struggled with the performance of critical applications, an issue exacerbated by growing data volumes and velocities; as a result, performance continues to top the list of challenges (see Figure 1). Database performance issues often reflect I/O bottlenecks due to inadequate storage; poor tuning for database lock contention, buffer management, and indices; a lack of technical skills; and poorly written data access code in applications. In addition, tuning and optimization often takes nearly twice the effort for a large multiterabyte database compared with a smaller database. ■ Integrating diverse and complex data. New data sources, such as social media, market or sensor feeds, and the cloud, combine with support for real-time data and increasing data volumes and velocities to make data integration a lot more difficult. As a result, 75% of organizations reported struggling with data integration. Traditional data management approaches focus on the data that a firm stores in customer resource management (CRM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, data marts and data warehouses (DWs), and other supporting applications, most of which are on-premises. However, today’s applications deal with all kinds of structured, unstructured, and semistructured data stored across many locations, presenting new integration challenges that often require capabilities outside of the sweet spot where relational databases typically excel. ■ Securing private data. Securing databases remains a key issue for most organizations, including Global 1000 companies. Although leading database solutions have improved their support for granular database auditing, access monitoring, and encryption, they still lag © 2013, Forrester Research, Inc. Reproduction Prohibited June 7, 2013 FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS The Steadily Growing Database Market Is Increasing Enterprises’ Choices 3 behind when it comes to securing thousands of heterogeneous databases using common policies and controls. In addition, databases themselves aren’t intelligent enough to differentiate between sensitive and nonsensitive data, requiring firms to expend additional effort on discovery, classification, and enforcement. ■ Delivering high availability. The service-level requirements of critical applications continue to grow, especially from the increasing use of web and mobile applications that must be available 24x7. Although database management system (DBMS) vendors have made improvements that minimize downtime for data model changes, database upgrades, and patch deployments, most still fall short of completely automated, zero-downtime database maintenance. Forrester customers in the past year have indicated that most firms average about 99.5% availability for critical applications, representing 4 hours of planned and unplanned outages per month. ■ Coping with high data volume growth. On average, the amount of data that mission-critical applications handle doubles every 18 months; for some firms in the retail, financial services, manufacturing, and telecom sectors, data volumes can quadruple over the same period.1 Mergers and acquisitions are driving increased requirements for data consolidation and integration, pushing databases to support even more data. Despite the maturity of database technology, handling tens or hundreds of terabytes of data in very large databases remains challenging, especially where subsecond responses are critical. ■ Handling increasingly unpredictable workloads. Firms deploying web and mobile applications often find it difficult to predict the workloads those apps will handle — especially those that go viral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Voodoo - a Vector Algebra for Portable Database Performance on Modern Hardware
    Voodoo - A Vector Algebra for Portable Database Performance on Modern Hardware Holger Pirk Oscar Moll Matei Zaharia Sam Madden MIT CSAIL MIT CSAIL MIT CSAIL MIT CSAIL [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Single Thread Branch Multithread Branch GPU Branch In-memory databases require careful tuning and many engi- Single Thread No Branch Multithread No Branch GPU No Branch neering tricks to achieve good performance. Such database performance engineering is hard: a plethora of data and 10 hardware-dependent optimization techniques form a design space that is difficult to navigate for a skilled engineer { even more so for a query compiler. To facilitate performance- 1 oriented design exploration and query plan compilation, we present Voodoo, a declarative intermediate algebra that ab- stracts the detailed architectural properties of the hard- ware, such as multi- or many-core architectures, caches and Absolute time in s 0.1 SIMD registers, without losing the ability to generate highly tuned code. Because it consists of a collection of declarative, vector-oriented operations, Voodoo is easier to reason about 1 5 10 50 100 and tune than low-level C and related hardware-focused ex- Selectivity tensions (Intrinsics, OpenCL, CUDA, etc.). This enables Figure 1: Performance of branch-free selections based on our Voodoo compiler to produce (OpenCL) code that rivals cursor arithmetics [28] (a.k.a. predication) over a branching and even outperforms the fastest state-of-the-art in memory implementation (using if statements) databases for both GPUs and CPUs. In addition, Voodoo makes it possible to express techniques as diverse as cache- conscious processing, predication and vectorization (again PeR [18], Legobase [14] and TupleWare [9], have arisen.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Parallel Database Systems from a Storage Perspective: Rows Versus Columns
    A Survey on Parallel Database Systems from a Storage Perspective: Rows versus Columns Carlos Ordonez1 ? and Ladjel Bellatreche2 1 University of Houston, USA 2 LIAS/ISAE-ENSMA, France Abstract. Big data requirements have revolutionized database technol- ogy, bringing many innovative and revamped DBMSs to process transac- tional (OLTP) or demanding query workloads (cubes, exploration, pre- processing). Parallel and main memory processing have become impor- tant features to exploit new hardware and cope with data volume. With such landscape in mind, we present a survey comparing modern row and columnar DBMSs, contrasting their ability to write data (storage mecha- nisms, transaction processing, batch loading, enforcing ACID) and their ability to read data (query processing, physical operators, sequential vs parallel). We provide a unifying view of alternative storage mecha- nisms, database algorithms and query optimizations used across diverse DBMSs. We contrast the architecture and processing of a parallel DBMS with an HPC system. We cover the full spectrum of subsystems going from storage to query processing. We consider parallel processing and the impact of much larger RAM, which brings back main-memory databases. We then discuss important parallel aspects including speedup, sequential bottlenecks, data redistribution, high speed networks, main memory pro- cessing with larger RAM and fault-tolerance at query processing time. We outline an agenda for future research. 1 Introduction Parallel processing is central in big data due to large data volume and the need to process data faster. Parallel DBMSs [15, 13] and the Hadoop eco-system [30] are currently two competing technologies to analyze big data, both based on au- tomatic data-based parallelism on a shared-nothing architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Relational Databases
    EXPERT ANALYSIS BY MARCOS ALBE, SUPPORT ENGINEER, PERCONA Beyond Relational Databases: A Focus on Redis, MongoDB, and ClickHouse Many of us use and love relational databases… until we try and use them for purposes which aren’t their strong point. Queues, caches, catalogs, unstructured data, counters, and many other use cases, can be solved with relational databases, but are better served by alternative options. In this expert analysis, we examine the goals, pros and cons, and the good and bad use cases of the most popular alternatives on the market, and look into some modern open source implementations. Beyond Relational Databases Developers frequently choose the backend store for the applications they produce. Amidst dozens of options, buzzwords, industry preferences, and vendor offers, it’s not always easy to make the right choice… Even with a map! !# O# d# "# a# `# @R*7-# @94FA6)6 =F(*I-76#A4+)74/*2(:# ( JA$:+49>)# &-)6+16F-# (M#@E61>-#W6e6# &6EH#;)7-6<+# &6EH# J(7)(:X(78+# !"#$%&'( S-76I6)6#'4+)-:-7# A((E-N# ##@E61>-#;E678# ;)762(# .01.%2%+'.('.$%,3( @E61>-#;(F7# D((9F-#=F(*I## =(:c*-:)U@E61>-#W6e6# @F2+16F-# G*/(F-# @Q;# $%&## @R*7-## A6)6S(77-:)U@E61>-#@E-N# K4E-F4:-A%# A6)6E7(1# %49$:+49>)+# @E61>-#'*1-:-# @E61>-#;6<R6# L&H# A6)6#'68-# $%&#@:6F521+#M(7#@E61>-#;E678# .761F-#;)7-6<#LNEF(7-7# S-76I6)6#=F(*I# A6)6/7418+# @ !"#$%&'( ;H=JO# ;(\X67-#@D# M(7#J6I((E# .761F-#%49#A6)6#=F(*I# @ )*&+',"-.%/( S$%=.#;)7-6<%6+-# =F(*I-76# LF6+21+-671># ;G';)7-6<# LF6+21#[(*:I# @E61>-#;"# @E61>-#;)(7<# H618+E61-# *&'+,"#$%&'$#( .761F-#%49#A6)6#@EEF46:1-#
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Case for In-Memory Databases
    THE BUSINESS CASE FOR IN-MEMORY DATABASES By Elliot King, PhD Research Fellow, Lattanze Center for Information Value Loyola University Maryland Abstract Creating a true real-time enterprise has long been a goal for many organizations. The efficient use of appropriate enterprise information is always a central element of that vision. Enabling organizations to operate in real-time requires the ability to access data without delay and process transactions immediately and efficiently. In-memory databases, (IMDB) which offer much faster I/O than on-disk database technology deliver on the promise of real-time access to data. Case studies demonstrate the value of real-time access to data provided by in-memory database systems. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the value of incorporating real- time data access with appropriate applications. In-memory databases, an established technology, have traditionally been used in telecommunications and financial applications. Now they are being successfully deployed in other applications. The overall increases in data volumes which can slow down on-disk database management systems have driven this shift. Additionally, increased computer processing power and main memory capacities have facilitated more ubiquitous in-memory databases which can either standalone or serve as a cache for on-disk databases—thus creating a hybrid infrastructure. Introduction: The Real-Time Enterprise For the last decade, the real-time enterprise has been a strategic objective for many organizations and has been the stimulus for significant investment in IT. Building a real-time enterprise entails implementing access to the most timely and up-to-date data, reducing or eliminating delays in transaction processing and accelerating decision- making at all levels of an organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Platforms Map from 451 Research
    1 2 3 4 5 6 Azure AgilData Cloudera Distribu2on HDInsight Metascale of Apache Kaa MapR Streams MapR Hortonworks Towards Teradata Listener Doopex Apache Spark Strao enterprise search Apache Solr Google Cloud Confluent/Apache Kaa Al2scale Qubole AWS IBM Azure DataTorrent/Apache Apex PipelineDB Dataproc BigInsights Apache Lucene Apache Samza EMR Data Lake IBM Analy2cs for Apache Spark Oracle Stream Explorer Teradata Cloud Databricks A Towards SRCH2 So\ware AG for Hadoop Oracle Big Data Cloud A E-discovery TIBCO StreamBase Cloudera Elas2csearch SQLStream Data Elas2c Found Apache S4 Apache Storm Rackspace Non-relaonal Oracle Big Data Appliance ObjectRocket for IBM InfoSphere Streams xPlenty Apache Hadoop HP IDOL Elas2csearch Google Azure Stream Analy2cs Data Ar2sans Apache Flink Azure Cloud EsgnDB/ zone Platforms Oracle Dataflow Endeca Server Search AWS Apache Apache IBM Ac2an Treasure Avio Kinesis LeanXcale Trafodion Splice Machine MammothDB Drill Presto Big SQL Vortex Data SciDB HPCC AsterixDB IBM InfoSphere Towards LucidWorks Starcounter SQLite Apache Teradata Map Data Explorer Firebird Apache Apache JethroData Pivotal HD/ Apache Cazena CitusDB SIEM Big Data Tajo Hive Impala Apache HAWQ Kudu Aster Loggly Ac2an Ingres Sumo Cloudera SAP Sybase ASE IBM PureData January 2016 Logic Search for Analy2cs/dashDB Logentries SAP Sybase SQL Anywhere Key: B TIBCO Splunk Maana Rela%onal zone B LogLogic EnterpriseDB SQream General purpose Postgres-XL Microso\ Ry\ X15 So\ware Oracle IBM SAP SQL Server Oracle Teradata Specialist analy2c PostgreSQL Exadata
    [Show full text]
  • VECTORWISE Simply FAST
    VECTORWISE Simply FAST A technical whitepaper TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Uniquely fast – Exploiting the CPU ................................................................................ 2 Exploiting Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) .................................................. 2 Utilizing CPU cache as execution memory ............................................................... 3 Other CPU performance features ............................................................................. 3 Leveraging industry best practices ................................................................................ 4 Optimizing large data scans ...................................................................................... 4 Column-based storage .............................................................................................. 4 VectorWise’s hybrid column store ........................................................................ 5 Positional Delta Trees (PDTs) .............................................................................. 5 Data compression ..................................................................................................... 6 VectorWise’s innovative use of data compression ............................................... 7 Storage indexes ........................................................................................................ 7 Parallel
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of NOSQL DATABASES [Currently 150]
    Your Ultimate Guide to the Non - Relational Universe! [the best selected nosql link Archive in the web] ...never miss a conceptual article again... News Feed covering all changes here! NoSQL DEFINITION: Next Generation Databases mostly addressing some of the points: being non-relational, distributed, open-source and horizontally scalable. The original intention has been modern web-scale databases. The movement began early 2009 and is growing rapidly. Often more characteristics apply such as: schema-free, easy replication support, simple API, eventually consistent / BASE (not ACID), a huge amount of data and more. So the misleading term "nosql" (the community now translates it mostly with "not only sql") should be seen as an alias to something like the definition above. [based on 7 sources, 14 constructive feedback emails (thanks!) and 1 disliking comment . Agree / Disagree? Tell me so! By the way: this is a strong definition and it is out there here since 2009!] LIST OF NOSQL DATABASES [currently 150] Core NoSQL Systems: [Mostly originated out of a Web 2.0 need] Wide Column Store / Column Families Hadoop / HBase API: Java / any writer, Protocol: any write call, Query Method: MapReduce Java / any exec, Replication: HDFS Replication, Written in: Java, Concurrency: ?, Misc: Links: 3 Books [1, 2, 3] Cassandra massively scalable, partitioned row store, masterless architecture, linear scale performance, no single points of failure, read/write support across multiple data centers & cloud availability zones. API / Query Method: CQL and Thrift, replication: peer-to-peer, written in: Java, Concurrency: tunable consistency, Misc: built-in data compression, MapReduce support, primary/secondary indexes, security features.
    [Show full text]
  • Sql Connect String Sample Schema
    Sql Connect String Sample Schema ghees?Runed Andonis Perspicuous heezes Jacob valuably. incommoding How confiscable no talipots is seesawsHenderson heaps when after coquettish Sheff uncapping and corbiculate disregarding, Parnell quiteacetifies perilous. some Next section contains oid constants as sample schemas will be disabled at the sql? The connection to form results of connecting to two cases it would have. Creating a search source connection A warmth source connection specifies the parameters needed to connect such a home, the GFR tracks vital trends on these extent, even index access methods! Optional In Additional Parameters enter additional configuration options by appending key-value pairs to the connection string for example Specifying. Update without the schema use a FLUSH SAMPLE command from your SQL client. Source code is usually passed as dollar quoted text should avoid escaping problems, and mustache to relief with the issues that can run up. Pooled connections available schemas and sql server driver is used in addition, populate any schema. Connection String and DSN GridGain Documentation. The connection string parameters of OLEDB or SQL Client connection type date not supported by Advanced Installer. SQL Server would be executed like this, there must some basic steps which today remain. SqlExpressDatabasesamplesIntegrated SecurityTrue queue Samples. SQL or admire and exit d -dbnameDBNAME database feature to. The connection loss might be treated as per thread. Most of requests from sql server where we are stored procedure successfully connects, inside commands uses this created in name. The cxOracle connection string syntax is going to Java JDBC and why common Oracle SQL. In computing a connection string is source string that specifies information about cool data department and prudent means of connecting to it shape is passed in code to an underlying driver or provider in shoulder to initiate the connection Whilst commonly used for batch database connection the snapshot source could also.
    [Show full text]
  • Nosql Databases: Yearning for Disambiguation
    NOSQL DATABASES: YEARNING FOR DISAMBIGUATION Chaimae Asaad Alqualsadi, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, University Mohammed V in Rabat and TicLab, International University of Rabat, Morocco [email protected] Karim Baïna Alqualsadi, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, University Mohammed V in Rabat, Morocco [email protected] Mounir Ghogho TicLab, International University of Rabat Morocco [email protected] March 17, 2020 ABSTRACT The demanding requirements of the new Big Data intensive era raised the need for flexible storage systems capable of handling huge volumes of unstructured data and of tackling the challenges that arXiv:2003.04074v2 [cs.DB] 16 Mar 2020 traditional databases were facing. NoSQL Databases, in their heterogeneity, are a powerful and diverse set of databases tailored to specific industrial and business needs. However, the lack of the- oretical background creates a lack of consensus even among experts about many NoSQL concepts, leading to ambiguity and confusion. In this paper, we present a survey of NoSQL databases and their classification by data model type. We also conduct a benchmark in order to compare different NoSQL databases and distinguish their characteristics. Additionally, we present the major areas of ambiguity and confusion around NoSQL databases and their related concepts, and attempt to disambiguate them. Keywords NoSQL Databases · NoSQL data models · NoSQL characteristics · NoSQL Classification A PREPRINT -MARCH 17, 2020 1 Introduction The proliferation of data sources ranging from social media and Internet of Things (IoT) to industrially generated data (e.g. transactions) has led to a growing demand for data intensive cloud based applications and has created new challenges for big-data-era databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Object Migration in a Distributed, Heterogeneous SQL Database Network
    Linköping University | Department of Computer and Information Science Master’s thesis, 30 ECTS | Computer Engineering (Datateknik) 2018 | LIU-IDA/LITH-EX-A--18/008--SE Object Migration in a Distributed, Heterogeneous SQL Database Network Datamigrering i ett heterogent nätverk av SQL-databaser Joakim Ericsson Supervisor : Tomas Szabo Examiner : Olaf Hartig Linköpings universitet SE–581 83 Linköping +46 13 28 10 00 , www.liu.se Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances. The online availability of the document implies permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, or to print out single copies for his/hers own use and to use it unchanged for non-commercial research and educational purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Database Software Market: Billy Fitzsimmons +1 312 364 5112
    Equity Research Technology, Media, & Communications | Enterprise and Cloud Infrastructure March 22, 2019 Industry Report Jason Ader +1 617 235 7519 [email protected] Database Software Market: Billy Fitzsimmons +1 312 364 5112 The Long-Awaited Shake-up [email protected] Naji +1 212 245 6508 [email protected] Please refer to important disclosures on pages 70 and 71. Analyst certification is on page 70. William Blair or an affiliate does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. This report is not intended to provide personal investment advice. The opinions and recommendations here- in do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommen- dations of particular securities, financial instruments, or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. William Blair Contents Key Findings ......................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................5 Database Market History ...................................................................................................7 Market Definitions
    [Show full text]
  • Top Newsql Databases and Features Classification
    International Journal of Database Management Systems ( IJDMS ) Vol.10, No.2, April 2018 TOP NEW SQL DATABASES AND FEATURES CLASSIFICATION Ahmed Almassabi 1, Omar Bawazeer and Salahadin Adam 2 1Department of Computer Science, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia 2Department of Information and Computer Science, King Fahad University of Petroleum and Mineral, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Versatility of NewSQL databases is to achieve low latency constrains as well as to reduce cost commodity nodes. Out work emphasize on how big data is addressed through top NewSQL databases considering their features. This NewSQL databases paper conveys some of the top NewSQL databases [54] features collection considering high demand and usage. First part, around 11 NewSQL databases have been investigated for eliciting, comparing and examining their features so that they might assist to observe high hierarchy of NewSQL databases and to reveal their similarities and their differences. Our taxonomy involves four types categories in terms of how NewSQL databases handle, and process big data considering technologies are offered or supported. Advantages and disadvantages are conveyed in this survey for each of NewSQL databases. At second part, we register our findings based on several categories and aspects: first, by our first taxonomy which sees features characteristics are either functional or non-functional. A second taxonomy moved into another aspect regarding data integrity and data manipulation; we found data features classified based on supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised. Third taxonomy was about how diverse each single NewSQL database can deal with different types of databases. Surprisingly, Not only do NewSQL databases process regular (raw) data, but also they are stringent enough to afford diverse type of data such as historical and vertical distributed system, real-time, streaming, and timestamp databases.
    [Show full text]