DOCSLIB.ORG

Religion in Russian Society: State Policy, Regional Challenges, and Individual Rights Conference Proceedings Edited by F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Religion in Russian Society: State Policy, Regional Challenges, and Individual Rights Conference Proceedings Edited by F Religion in Russian Society: State Policy, Regional Challenges, and Individual Rights Conference Proceedings Edited by F. Joseph Dresen Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars OCCASIONAL PAPER #298 KENNAN One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW INSTITUTE Washington, DC 20004-3027 Tel. (202) 691-4100 Fax (202) 691-4247 www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan ISBN 1-933549-35-1 The Kennan Institute is a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Through its programs of residential scholarships, meetings, and publications, the Institute encourages scholarship on the successor states to the Soviet Union, embracing a broad range of fields in the social sciences and humanities. The Kennan Institute is supported by contributions from foundations, corporations, individuals, and the United States Government. Kennan Institute Occasional Papers The Kennan Institute makes Occasional Papers available to all those interested. Occasional Papers are submitted by Kennan Institute scholars and visiting speakers. Copies of Occasional Papers and a list of papers currently available can be obtained free of charge by contacting: Occasional Papers Kennan Institute One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 (202) 691-4100 Occasional Papers published since 1999 are available on the Institute’s web site, www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan. This Occasional Paper has been produced with the support of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation and the Program for Research and Training on Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union of the U.S. Department of State (funded by the Soviet and East European Research and Training Act of 1983, or Title VIII). The Kennan Institute is most grateful for this support. The views expressed in Kennan Institute Occasional Papers are those of the authors. 2008 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN 1-933549-35-1 WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, President and Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair David A. Metzner, Vice Chair PUBLIC MEMBERS: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Tamala L. Longaberger, Designated Appointee of the President from Within the Federal Government; Condoleezza Rice, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Cristián Samper, Acting Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Margaret Spellings, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education PRIVATE CITIZEN MEMBERS: Robin B. Cook, Donald E. Garcia, Bruce S. Gelb, Sander R. Gerber, Charles L. Glazer, Susan Hutchison, Ignacio E. Sanchez ABOUT THE CENTER The Center is the living memorial of the United States of America to the nation’s twenty- eighth president, Woodrow Wilson. Congress established the Woodrow Wilson Center in 1968 as an international institute for advanced study, “symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relationship between the world of learning and the world of public affairs.” The Center opened in 1970 under its own board of trustees. In all its activities the Woodrow Wilson Center is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, supported financially by annual appropriations from Congress, and by the contributions of foundations, corporations, and individuals. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. Religion in Russian Society: State Policy, Regional Challenges, and Individual Rights Conference Proceedings Edited by F. Joseph Dresen Washington, D.C. OCCASIONAL PAPER #298 Religion in Russian Society: State Policy, Regional Challenges, and Individual Rights Co-sponsored by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation June 8–9, 2006 Washington, D.C. CONTENTS PANELIST BIOGRAPHIES 1 CONFERENCE ORGANIZERS 5 PREFACE 7 WELCOMING REMARKS 9 Blair A. Ruble, Director, Kennan Institute Neelima Shah, Program Officer, Henry M. Jackson Foundation PANEL 1: RUSSIAN STATE POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON RELIGION 11 Chair: David Abramson, Analyst for Russia and Eurasia, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, U.S. Department of State Alexey Malashenko, Scholar in Residence and Program Co-Chair, Religion, Society, and Security Program, Carnegie Moscow Center Robert Crews, Assistant Professor, Department of History, Stanford University, and former Research Scholar, Kennan Institute Nancy Hewett, Senior Adviser on Eurasian Affairs, Office of International Religious Freedom, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State Elizabeth Sewell, Associate Director, International Center for Law and Religion Studies, Brigham Young University PANEL 2: THE REGIONAL CHALLENGE: 31 MANAGING RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY Chair: Margaret Paxson, Senior Associate, Kennan Institute Sascha Goluboff, Associate Professor of Cultural Anthropology, Washington and Lee University, and author, Jewish Russians: Upheavals in a Moscow Synagogue Alexander Bogomolov, Vice President, Association of Middle East Studies, Ukraine Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer, Research Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Georgetown University PANEL 3: INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM OF FAITH IN RUSSIA 51 Chair: H. Knox Thames, Counsel, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (U.S. Helsinki Commission) Nikolas Gvosdev, Editor, The National Interest; Senior Fellow, Institute for Strategic Studies, The Nixon Center; and Senior Fellow, Institute for Religion and Public Policy Catherine Cosman, Senior Policy Analyst, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Firuz Kazemzadeh, Professor Emeritus of History, Yale University; former Vice Chairman, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom; and Senior Adviser, Office of External Affairs, Baha’i Faith Discussant: Kate Brown, Associate Professor of History, University of Maryland, Baltimore County FINAL OBSERVATIONS 71 Panelist Biographies David Abramson is an analyst on Central president of the Kyiv-based Association of Asia in the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Middle East Studies (AMES), of which he is Intelligence and Research. Previously, he also a founder. AMES is a nongovernmental worked in the State Department’s Office of think tank engaged in research and policy analy- International Religious Freedom, where he sis focusing on the Middle East, Central Asia, promoted religious freedom in the Middle East the Caucasus, ethnic conflicts, minority issues, and contributed to U.S. outreach efforts toward and Ukraine’s domestic and foreign policies. the Muslim world, including the American Bogomolov is the author of Islamic Identity in Muslim community. Abramson received a doc- Ukraine (2005), which was declared the nation- torate in cultural anthropology from Indiana al Book of the Year 2005 in humanities in University, specializing in community and con- Ukraine. He is a regular contributor to major flict in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. He spent four Ukrainian media (TV, print, radio) on the years as a research fellow at Brown University’s Middle East and Muslim minority issues. Watson Institute for International Studies before heading to Washington. Abramson has lectured Kate Brown is an associate professor of histo- and written on Islam and secularism in ry at the University of Maryland, Baltimore Uzbekistan, the politics of civil society assis- County. She is the author of A Biography of No tance in Central Asia, and the role of religion in Place: From Ethnic Borderland to Soviet Heartland U.S. foreign policy. (Harvard University Press, 2004), which won the American Historical Association’s George Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer is a research Louis Beer Prize for the best book in interna- professor at Georgetown University in the tional European history, the Heldt Prize from Department of Sociology and Anthropology the Association of Women in Slavic Studies, and and the Center for Eurasian, Russian, and East an honorable mention for the American European Studies (CERES). She is editor of the Association for the Advancement of Slavic M. E. Sharpe journal Anthropology and Archeology Studies’ Wayne C. Vucinich Prize for 2005. She of Eurasia and of the books Shamanic Worlds: holds a Ph.D. in history from the University of Rituals and Lore of Siberia and Central Asia (1997), Washington and has received fellowships from Culture Incarnate: Native Anthropology from Russia the Social Science Research Council, the (1995), and Russian Traditional Culture (1992). International Research and Exchanges Board, She is author of The Tenacity of Ethnicity: A the Davis Center of Harvard University, the Siberian Saga in Global Perspective (Princeton National Council for East European and University Press, 1999). Her fieldwork since Eurasian Research, and the Eurasia Foundation. 1986 has focused primarily on the Turkic- speaking Sakha [Yakut] of the Russian Catherine Cosman joined the staff of the Federation, and in the 1990s she helped organ- U.S. Commission on International Religious ize exchanges of Native American and Native Freedom in late 2003 as senior policy analyst for Siberian leaders. She is editor of a forthcoming the region embracing the member states of the volume, Religion and Politics in the Russian Organization for Security and Cooperation in Federation (M. E. Sharpe), and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Religion, State and 'Sovereign Democracy' in Putin's Russia
    Religion, state and ‘sovereign democracy’ in Putin’s Russia John Anderson School of International Relations University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland KY16 8EB (01334 462931; [email protected]) John Anderson is Professor of International Relations at the University of St Andrews. He has published widely on religion and politics in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet states, on religion and democratisation, on Christianity and politics in Russia, Europe and the USA, and on the politics of Central Asia. His most recent book is Conservative Christian Politics in Russia and the United States (Manchester University Press, 2015). 1 Abstract This article explores the role of the dominant Russian Orthodox Church in the evolution of the post-communist Russian Federation. This is not a classic case where religion may have contributed to the democratisation of society because this has not been a primary goal of political elites, and the regime that has emerged might best be described as ‘hybrid’ with growing authoritarian tendencies. Having played little role in the ending of communism, having little historical experience of working within a democracy, suspicious of liberal- individualist visions of public life and committed to a vision of its role as the hegemonic religious institution, the promotion of democratic governance has not been a priority of church leaders. At the same time the political structures created by the Kremlin encourage a degree of conformity and support for the regime by key social actors, and in the wake of the political crisis of 2011-12 there have been further incentives for church and state to work more closely together.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Good Faith
    On the Good Faith Zoroastrianism is ascribed to the teachings of the legendary prophet Zarathustra and originated in ancient times. It was developed within the area populated by the Iranian peoples, and following the Arab conquest, it formed into a diaspora. In modern Russia it has evolved since the end of the Soviet era. It has become an attractive object of cultural produc- tion due to its association with Oriental philosophies and religions and its rearticulation since the modern era in Europe. The lasting appeal of Zoroastrianism evidenced by centuries of book pub- lishing in Russia was enlivened in the 1990s. A new, religious, and even occult dimension was introduced with the appearance of neo-Zoroastrian groups with their own publications and online websites (dedicated to Zoroastrianism). This study focuses on the intersectional relationships and topical analysis of different Zoroastrian themes in modern Russia. On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge [email protected] www.sh.se/publications On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola 2012 Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications Cover Image: Anna Tessmann Cover Design: Jonathan Robson Layout: Jonathan Robson & Per Lindblom Printed by E-print, Stockholm 2012 Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations 68 ISSN 1652-7399 ISBN 978-91-86069-50-6 Avhandlingar utgivna vid
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia Through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises Through Art
    Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises through Art. Understanding Reverse Perspective in Old Russian Iconography by Ihar Maslenikau B.A., Minsk, 1991 Extended Essays Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Ihar Maslenikau 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2015 Approval Name: Ihar Maslenikau Degree: Master of Arts Title: Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises through Art. Understanding of Reverse Perspective in Old Russian Iconography Examining Committee: Chair: Gary McCarron Associate Professor, Dept. of Communication Graduate Chair, Graduate Liberal Studies Program Jerry Zaslove Senior Supervisor Professor Emeritus Humanities and English Heesoon Bai Supervisor Professor Faculty of Education Paul Crowe External Examiner Associate Professor Humanities and Asia-Canada Program Date Defended/Approved: November 25, 2015 ii Abstract The first essay is a sustained reflection on and response to the question of why the notion of collectivism and collective coexistence has been so deeply entrenched in the Russian society and in the Russian psyche and is still pervasive in today's Russia, a quarter of a century after the fall of communism. It examines the development of ideas of collectivism and individualism in Russian society, focusing on the cultural aspects based on the examples of selected works from Russian literature. It also searches for the answers in the philosophical works of Vladimir Solovyov, Nicolas Berdyaev and Vladimir Lossky.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform and Human Rights the Gorbachev Record
    100TH-CONGRESS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES [ 1023 REFORM AND HUMAN RIGHTS THE GORBACHEV RECORD REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES BY THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE MAY 1988 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1988 84-979 = For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE STENY H. HOYER, Maryland, Chairman DENNIS DeCONCINI, Arizona, Cochairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TIMOTHY WIRTH, Colorado BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico WYCHE FOWLER, Georgia EDWARD FEIGHAN, Ohio HARRY REED, Nevada DON RITTER, Pennslyvania ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey JOHN HEINZ, Pennsylvania JACK F. KEMP, New York JAMES McCLURE, Idaho JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois MALCOLM WALLOP, Wyoming EXECUTIvR BRANCH HON. RICHARD SCHIFIER, Department of State Vacancy, Department of Defense Vacancy, Department of Commerce Samuel G. Wise, Staff Director Mary Sue Hafner, Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel Jane S. Fisher, Senior Staff Consultant Michael Amitay, Staff Assistant Catherine Cosman, Staff Assistant Orest Deychakiwsky, Staff Assistant Josh Dorosin, Staff Assistant John Finerty, Staff Assistant Robert Hand, Staff Assistant Gina M. Harner, Administrative Assistant Judy Ingram, Staff Assistant Jesse L. Jacobs, Staff Assistant Judi Kerns, Ofrice Manager Ronald McNamara, Staff Assistant Michael Ochs, Staff Assistant Spencer Oliver, Consultant Erika B. Schlager, Staff Assistant Thomas Warner, Pinting Clerk (11) CONTENTS Page Summary Letter of Transmittal .................... V........................................V Reform and Human Rights: The Gorbachev Record ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Nationalism in Russia: a Postmodern Identity?
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 14 Issue 2 Article 4 4-1994 Religious Nationalism in Russia: A Postmodern Identity? Mikhail Sergeev Temple University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Sergeev, Mikhail (1994) "Religious Nationalism in Russia: A Postmodern Identity?," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 14 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol14/iss2/4 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RELIGIOUS NATIONALISM IN RUSSIA: A POSTMODERN IDENTITY? by Mikhail Sergeev Mikhail Sergeev is a native of Russia. He studied at Moscow Institute of International Relations. He received his M.A. from Temple University and is currently a doctoral student at the same institution. This article is based on a presentation he made at the American Academy of Religion in 1993 in Washington, D.C., at the Eastern European and Former Soviet Concerns Consultation, "Nationalism and Religion." Since the 19th century the cultural life of Russia has been shaped by two major ideological movements which, as a famous Russian philosopher and writer, Alexander Herzen, once noted, were like the two heads of one eagle. The first party, the Slavophils, claimed that Russia should follow its specific way based on the Orthodox Christian tradition while their antagonists, the Westernizers, insisted on joining the large root of the Western secularized civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiculturalism in Russia FINAL For
    CHARLES UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE FACULTY OF SOCIАL SCIENCES INTЕRNАTIONAL ЕCONOMIC AND POLITICАL STUDIES MASTER'S THESIS MULTICULTURALISM IN RUSSIA. MUSLIM POPULATION CASE STUDY. Author Bulat Kemalov Subjеct: IEPS Academic Year: 2011/2012 Supervisor: PhDr. Emil Souleimanov Ph.D. Date Submitted: 7th May 2012 Abstract Many researchers say that the multiculturalism in Russia has emerged recently, but this term started to dеvеlop few dеcades ago. During this time period we have seen its significant change and improvement. Russian sociеty culturally is very divеrse. There are many different nаtions, culturеs, religions, and even civilizations living in Russia. The uniqueness of Russia consists in the fact that those different culturеs are its indigenous people. There is probably no other stаte in the world with such a high number of different culturеs living together relatively peacefully for centuries. Also, culturally diverse population of Russia is not composed of migrаnts as in the case of Europe or the USA. For this purpose the beginning of the thesis is dedicated to understanding of the term multiculturalism, cultural diversity, minority groups and similar. Multiculturalism developed significantly especially in the phase of last events which took place in the Wеst. The 9/11 has brought several changes. Also, the latest incidents (and the speeches of the several lеadеrs) in Europe have shown Europeans and the rest of the world that the situation in immigrаnt welcoming rеgions is not positive as before. This makes the policy of multiculturalism even more complicated in the light of present developments. The Muslims represents a significant part of the Russian population. The Muslim community consists of various еthnicities and nаtions, which are sometimes very different from each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Impact of 1997 Law on Religion on Non-Traditional Religious Minorities (2000-2004) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa
    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 17 June 2004 RUS42685.E Russia: Impact of 1997 law on religion on non-traditional religious minorities (2000-2004) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa The 1997 Russian law On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations acknowledges Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Judaism as traditional religions in Russia (Russia 1 Oct. 1997). This report updates information on the impact of the 1997 law on religion on Pentecostals, Baptists and Jehovah's Witnesses, found in RUS35701.E of 9 November 2000, and provides information on the situation of religions not acknowledged within the "traditional religions" mentioned in the 1997 law. Please note that although they are members of what are considered traditional religions in Russia, some Catholics (Interfax 25 Feb. 2003; ibid. 24 Jan. 2003; ibid. 13 Sep. 2002; ibid. 9 Sep. 2002; ibid. 29 Aug. 2002; ibid. 12 July 2002; ibid. 6 May 2002; ibid. 24 Apr. 2002; Keston News Service 22 Apr. 2002; IRFW 27 Apr. 2004), Muslims (EECR 2002; Washington Post 23 Dec. 2002; Rossiyskaya Gazeta 12 Oct. 2002), Buddhists (UCSJ 7 June 2004; St. Petersburg Times 23 Aug. 2002; ibid. 20 Aug. 2002) and Jews (Interfax 7 Feb. 2002; UCSJ 15 Oct. 2002), have encountered difficulties based on their religion in Russia since 2000. General Opinion President Putin commented in 2001 that Christianity and Islam coexist harmoniously in Russia (Rossiyskaya Gazeta 7 Sept. 2001) and President Rakhimov of the province of Bashkortostan built on this in 2002 when he commented that Christianity, Islam and Buddhism have been practiced in peace for over one hundred years on Russian territory (ibid.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNLOADS Full Set 49.99 USD
    INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM // JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2016 // GLOBAL EDITION WORD FROM JERUSALEM Survivors: THE BUILDERS OF ISRAEL LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR Dear friends, This year started with the world removing sanctions from a nation that is probably the greatest supporter and financer of terrorism – the country of Iran. Iranian President Rouhani was quick to offer his analysis: “The only ones who do not rejoice about the deal is Israel and radical elements in America” – referring to the more conservative-minded group of US citizens. That same week, the European Union added another statement regarding the labelling law which said all agreements with Israel would only apply to Israel, not anybody living in what the Bible calls Judea or Samaria. While this is a politically problematic resolution, of far greater concern is the spiritual and moral foundation of these decisions. Iran, a terror state which publicly executed more than 700 people in the first half of 2015 alone, has now been politically and economically rewarded for a questionable compromise on their nuclear program. At the same time Israel, the only The International Christian Embassy Jerusalem was established in democracy in the Middle East, is being punished and pressured to make concessions 1980 in recognition of the biblical significance of all of Jerusalem to a regime that refused to engage on the basic principles of the free world. and its unique connection to the Jewish people. Today the ICEJ represents millions of Christians, churches and denominations to the nation and people of Israel. We recognise in the restoration The prophet Zechariah challenges the rich and wealthy nations of the world who of Israel the faithfulness of God to keep His ancient covenant “are at ease.” (Zech.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Religion in Russia a Choice for Russian Modernization? by Elina Kahla
    56 peer-reviewed essay Civil religion in Russia A choice for Russian modernization? by Elina Kahla his essay addresses aspects of the cultural traditions by virtue of its history and as the religion of the ethnic majority, and practices of Russian Orthodox believers and bear- has dominated other confessions. As a result, cultural and politi- ers of that church’s legacy in contemporary society, cal Orthodoxy formed the modus vivendi that in the public sphere especially in the gray area between the secular and of symbols, legislation, and practices, ruled not just over its own religious spheres of life. The theoretical basis of the present study adherents but over non-Orthodox, non-Russians, and non-be- is rooted in Jürgen Habermas’s understanding of the “post-sec- lievers as well. By inertia, the ROC and the Kremlin today aspire ular”, by which is meant the regaining of religion by individuals to revive the prerevolutionary tradition of symphony, while si- and societies. Habermas proposes a new “third way” for a social multaneously admitting the multiconfessional and secular status contract, one that requires an equal dialog between religious and of the state. Given this controversy, it is safe to posit that a better secular citizens.1 My aim here is to elaborate on the improvement analysis of the Russian model of civil religion is urgently needed — of the relationship among the church, the state, and society in the even more so today, when the conflict in Ukraine is drawing two contemporary Russian situation by comparing it with the West, Orthodox nations into fratricide.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Islamic Banking Establishment in Russia
    CHALLENGES OF ISLAMIC BANKING ESTABLISHMENT IN RUSSIA CHALLENGES OF ISLAMIC BANKING ESTABLISHMENT IN RUSSIA Artur Gubaydullin Penerbit YPM Judul buku : CHALLENGES OF ISLAMIC BANKING ESTABLISHMENT IN RUSSIA Penulis Artur Gubaydullin Layout Juna Excel ISBN 978-602-5576-11-9 xiv+ 170 hlm .; ukuran buku 20,5 x 14,5 cm © Hak Cipta Artur Gubaydullin, Maret 2018 Hak penerbitan dimiliki Young Progressive Muslim. Dilarang mengkopi sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini dengan cara apapun, termasuk dengan cara penggunaan mesin fotokopi, tanpa izin sah dari penerbit. Young Progressive Muslim Jl. Talas II Pondok Cabe Ilir Pamulang Rt.05 Rw.01 Tangerang Selatan 15418 Acknowledgement Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Rodoni for the continuous support of my Master study, for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank Prof. Suwito and Prof. Yusuf Rahman with whom I started my first steps in my Master study for always be there to listen and give advice. I am deeply grateful to them for the discussions that helped me sort out the technical details of my work. I am also thankful to them for encouraging the use of correct grammar and consistent notation in my writings and for carefully reading and commenting on revisions of this manuscript. I wish to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. Masykuri Abdillah,MA. Director of Graduate School, for providing me with all the necessary facilities for the research. My sincere thanks also goes to Pak.
    [Show full text]
  • RODNOVERY and the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE: by Demetria K. Green
    RODNOVERY AND THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE: LINKING ANCIENT RELIGION WITH THE EVOLUTION OF EAST SLAVIC LANGUAGES by Demetria K. Green A capstone submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Government Analytics Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Demetria K. Green All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The origin, formation, and evolution of language has been an ongoing topic since the beginning of linguistics itself. This research aims to demonstrate and explain the relationship between the Slavic Native Faith, Rodnovery, and the development of the Russian language, as well as the impact of this relationship on the survival and ultimate comeback of the Native Faith in Russian society. To assess these two dimensions, a combination of both demographical data and lexical data have been used to perform multivariate regression analyses. The demographics data encompass the role of religion in modern Russian society, including non-Orthodox faiths like Rodnovery, and provide insight not only into presence of the faith but also its importance. The lexical data are comprised of 564,493 words taken from the modern Russian language, which were subsequently filtered to remove non-Slavic loan words and categorized by root word. The most important root word analyzed was rod, the name of the primary Rodnover god, and compared with the English language and its equivalent word, god. The results showed that overwhelmingly, the Russian language is far more heavily centered around religious terms than is English. Additionally, comparison between the two types of data allows for the secondary inference to be made—that it is plausible that Rodnovery survived a thousand years of repression due to its tenants being embedded within the Russian language itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Sergei Filatov & Roman Lunkin
    Religion, State & Society, Vol. 34, No. 1, March 2006 Statistics on Religion in Russia: The Reality behind the Figures* SERGEI FILATOV & ROMAN LUNKIN Introduction Since perestroika religious organisations have been playing a substantial political and social role, and the size of the various religious communities has become an important political factor. Accuracy in assessing the size of religious communities is essential for proper relations between religion and society and between religion and the secular powers. There is a general 'figures fetish' about religions. Statistics are regularly produced showing how many Orthodox, or Catholics, or Muslims there are in Russia, but people do not have a clear idea of what the figures mean or what they really represent. Meanwhile religious leaders and politicians aim to give the impression that figures of so many million, faithfully reproduced from one publication to another, represent the number of people who adhere to particular doctrines and moral codes and who support their religious leaders. Assessing the number of adherents of a particular religion or confession is however a more ambiguous exercise than assessing the number of members of a political party, a social movement or a trade union. A positive answer to the question 'Do you support Putin?' will usually imply something qualitatively different from a positive answer to the question 'Do you support Orthodoxy?, A supporter of Putin is presumably going to vote for Putin, but without supplementary questions it is not at all clear what a supporter of Orthodoxy is going to do. There are all kinds of theoretical criteria for belonging to a particular religion, reflecting conscious or unconscious assumptions about the particular features of various religions which are made by religious activists, scholars, politicians and journalists.
    [Show full text]