Skin Problems Related to Noninfectious Coastal Microorganisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Skin Problems Related to Noninfectious Coastal Microorganisms Dermatologic Therapy, Vol. 15, 2002, 10±17 Copyright # Blackwell Publishing, Inc., 2002 Printed in the United States Á All rights reserved DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY ISSN 1396-0296 Skin problems related to noninfectious coastal microorganisms y WILLIAM A. BURKE* & PATRICIA A. TESTER *Department of Dermatology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, and yNational Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina ABSTRACT: While there are a number of coastal microorganisms that can cause infections of the skin, there are many that can cause skin problems that are noninfectious in nature. From cyanobacterial dermatitis to skin problems related to dinoflagellates, to skin signs of ciguatera or scombroid fish poisonings, to ``sea lice''/``seabather's eruption,'' to ``swimmer's itch,'' this article attempts to separate these entities into distinct syndromes caused by a variety of bacteria, phytoplankton and zooplankton. Treatment and prevention of these diseases are also discussed. KEYWORDS: bites and stings, ciguatoxin, cyanobacteria, Dinoflagellata, marine toxins, Pfiesteria piscicida, schistosomatidae. There are many noninfectiouscutaneous Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) problemsthat are causedby aquatic microor- ganisms such as bacteria, phytoplankton, and Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) are prokaryotic, zooplankton. While some of these problems are chlorophyll-containing, microscopic filamentous relatively insignificant and require only sympto- and nonfilamentous organisms found in fresh- matic care and reassurance, a few may be fatal. water, estuarine, and marine environments. These It isimportant for cliniciansto recognize the organisms proliferate in areas of high nutrient varied signs and symptoms of these diseases overload and can form blue-green, milky-blue, based on a proper history and physical exam- green, red, or dark-brown ``blooms'' or ``scums'' (1). ination, as well as having a basic understanding While not all cyanobacteria are toxic, some of the causative microscopic flora and fauna. species such as Lyngbya, Microcystis, Anabaena, Skin problemsrelated to bacterial skin infections Aphanizomenon, Cylindrospermopsis, Nodularia, are covered elsewhere in this issue, and only and Oscillatoria/Trichodesmium (Fig. 1) have noninfectious microorganisms will be discussed been shown to produce toxins which may be here. relatively harmful (1±4). These toxins can be hazardousto human and animal health and have been responsible for sporadic animal (mammals, birds, fish) fatalities (5). Cyanobacterial toxins may be tumor promoters, hepatotoxins, neuro- Address correspondence and reprint requests to: William A. Burke, MD, Department of Dermatology, Brody School of toxins, or skin irritants (6,7). Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd., Brody 3E- Human illness related to cyanobacteria and 113, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, or e-mail: burkew@mail. their toxinsmay be via direct contact (recrea- ecu.edu. tional or other) or ingestion (of water, fish, or 10 Noninfectious coastal microorganisms presumptive diagnosis. Recreational and occupa- tional exposure as well as possible ingestion need to be considered. There isno proven therapy for cyanobacterial toxicity. Treatment of systemic disease is with supportive care, and symptomatic care with antihistamines and topical steroid creams is often used for the cutaneous component (11,12). Re- moval of the bathing suit and showering quickly after leaving the water isimportant in prevention of the dermatitis. Eye stings should be treated with irrigation with tap water followed by ophthalmologic consultation (11). Fig. 1. Filaments of Trichodesmium, a cyanobacter- Skin stings and rashes from cyanobacteria have ium (blue-green alga) (original magnification 200Â). been given many names: ``algae dermatitis,'' ``seabather's eruption,'' ``stinging limu,'' and ``sea- weed dermatitis.'' To avoid confusion, it seems shellfish). In a hemodialysis unit in Brazil, 126 reasonable to term skin eruptions due to toxic patients became seriously ill and 60 of them died cyanobacteria simply ``cyanobacterial dermatitis.'' when water from a lake contaminated with cyanobacterial toxins(microcystins)wasusedat the unit (8). Deathswere primarily from liver Estuarine and marine phytoplankton failure, and ecchymoses were seen in some of these patients (8). Unicellular eukaryotic phytoplankton can cause Skin reactionsfrom cyanobacterial toxinswere skin reactionsÐsome when ingested and some on initially reported from the organism Lyngbya skin contact. A variety of intoxications may occur majuscula, which secretes lyngbyatoxins which when variousendotoxin-producing marine phy- can be irritating to skin and mucous membranes, toplankton (dinoflagellates, as well as a marine causing irritant dermatitis and conjunctivitis diatom) are filtered and concentrated by (9,10). Thisfilamentousorganismbloomsinto shellfish and later ingested by people. These algal matswhich cover surface waterswhen a shellfish poisoning syndromes include paralytic high nutrient load occurs. Periods of high winds shellfish poisoning, neurotoxic shellfish poison- and flooding rains can cause these mats to flow ing, amnesic shellfish poisoning, and diarrhetic into coastal and estuarine waters where wave shellfish poisoning. While these intoxications can action breaksthe matsapart into individual be severe and some may lead to death, they microscopic filaments. Bathing suits on persons generally do not affect the skin (13±15). swimming in affected waters filter and collect Ciguatera fish poisoning is caused by eating microscopic toxin-secreting cyanobacterial fila- fish which have bioconcentrated the tropical/ ments under the suits. As the swimmer leaves subtropical epiphytic reef-associated Gambierdis- the water and the water from the bathing suit cus toxicus dinoflagellate in their tissue. Several evaporates, toxins are concentrated and skin other epiphytic dinoflagellateshave alsobeen irritation (at timeswith blistering)may occur, implicated. With approximately 50,000 cases most commonly in areas covered by the bathing annually throughout the world, this disease has suit. Eye stings and conjunctivitis have also been become the most common illness related to reported (11). consumption of finfish, primarily due to exporta- Blistering skin reactions around the mouth tion of fish from tropical/subtropical areas to have also been reported possibly due to micro- other partsof the world (16,17). Fishcommonly cystins after contact with water containing toxic implicated include mackerel, jacks, coral trout, Microcystis aeruginosa (12). Affected individuals barracuda, grouper, flowery cod, snapper, reef had many other signs and symptoms, including sharks, moray eel, wrasse, and others (16±21). malaise, fever, cough, pleuritic chest pain, ab- Ciguatoxin, maitotoxin, and other toxins asso- dominal pain, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and ciated with G. toxicus are lipid soluble and cold/ pneumonia. It isimportant to take a careful heat stable. history when a patient presents with possible Ciguatera poisoning usually presents within cyanobacterial skin eruptions in order to make a 3±6 hours after ingestion as gastroenteritis 11 Burke & Tester (diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting) and neurologic symptoms (weakness, headache, tremor, ataxia) (20,21). Paresthesia of the extre- mitiesand circumoral area aswell ashot-cold temperature reversal are symptoms frequently seen in ciguatera toxicity, and can help separate this illness from other causes of gastroenteritis. Skin problemsinclude severe pruritus(which isa common complaint and which can last for years) (16) and rarely chronic urticaria. Death isquite rare, but may occur due to cardiopulmonary arrest. Treatment of the acute toxicity iswith mannitol infusion (1 g/kg intravenously over 30±45 minutes) (22,23). Chronic symptoms are treated with ami- Fig. 3. Sea surface temperature satellite imageryof triptyline, tocainide, mexiletine, nifedipine, and the Gulf Stream (dark red) which serves as a method gabapentin (24±27). of transport to distribute Karenia brevis blooms from the Gulf of Mexico to the U.S. South Atlantic Bight. Another dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis (pre- (Photo courtesyof NOAA.) viously known as Gymnodinium breve) (Fig. 2), can develop into huge bloomscalled ``red tides,'' because of the reddish discoloration it causes in Unlike most dinoflagellates, K. brevis isa affected water. Thisorganismproducesendotox- ``naked'' dinoflagellate and lackspolysaccharide ins that have been classified as brevetoxins. These protective plates of armor. Because of this, heavy toxins can cause massive fish kills, and when wave action and surf can cause its cell mem- filtered and concentrated by shellfish and then branesto rupture, thereby releasingand aero- ingested, neurotoxic shellfish poisoning. K. brevis solizing the endotoxins (29). As the toxins are very migrate to the upper part of the water column and irritating to skin and mucous membranes, it can are transported throughout the Gulf of Mexico cause an irritant dermatitis, conjunctivitis, phar- and the U.S. South Atlantic Bight by major current yngitis, rhinorrhea, sneezing, coughing, and dys- systems (Fig. 3) (28). pnea (17,29). As the toxins also cause smooth muscle contraction, wheezing and asthma may also occur, and this can be a major problem for persons who have already been diagnosed with asthma (30±32). Asthere
Recommended publications
  • RESEARCH ARTICLE Anti-Glioma Effect of Pseudosynanceia
    DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.7.2295 Effect of Pseudosynanceia Melanostigma Venom on Glioblastoma Cells RESEARCH ARTICLE Editorial Process: Submission:02/14/2021 Acceptance:07/15/2021 Anti-Glioma Effect of Pseudosynanceia Melanostigma Venom on Isolated Mitochondria from Glioblastoma Cells Maral Ramezani, Fatemeh Samiei, Jalal Pourahmad* Abstract Background: Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system that occurs in the spinal cord or brain. Pseudosynanceia Melanostigma is a venomous stonefish in the Persian Gulf, which our knowledge about is little. This study’s goal is to investigate the toxicity of stonefish crude venom on mitochondria isolated from U87 cells. Methods: In the first stage, we extracted venom stonefish and then isolated mitochondria have exposed to different concentrations of venom. Finally, mitochondrial toxicity parameters (Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity, Reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytochrome c release, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP), and mitochondrial swelling) have evaluated. Results: To determine mitochondrial parameters, we used 115, 230, and 460 µg/ml concentrations. The results of our study show that the venom of stonefish selectively increases upstream parameters of apoptosis such as mitochondrial swelling, cytochrome c release, MMP collapse and ROS. Conclusion: This study suggests that Pseudosynanceia Melanostigma crude venom has selectively caused toxicity by increasing active mitochondrial oxygen radicals. This venom could potentially be a candidate for the treatment of glioblastoma. Keywords: Mitochondria- glioblastoma- fish venoms- cell line- tumor- toxicity-Persian Gulf Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 22 (7), 2295-2302 Introduction freshwater or saltwater. Marine animals most commonly used for animals live in saltwater, i.e. in oceans, seas, Glioblastoma multiform is the most common group of etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Bites
    Infectious Disease Epidemiology Section Office of Public Health, Louisiana Dept of Health & Hospitals 800-256-2748 (24 hr number) www.infectiousdisease.dhh.louisiana.gov SPIDER BITES Revised 6/13/2007 Epidemiology There are over 3,000 species of spiders native to the United States. Due to fragility or inadequate length of fangs, only a limited number of species are capable of inflicting noticeable wounds on human beings, although several small species of spiders are able to bite humans, but with little or no demonstrable effect. The final determination of etiology of 80% of suspected spider bites in the U.S. is, in fact, an alternate diagnosis. Therefore the perceived risk of spider bites far exceeds actual risk. Tick bites, chemical burns, lesions from poison ivy or oak, cutaneous anthrax, diabetic ulcer, erythema migrans from Lyme disease, erythema from Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, sporotrichosis, Staphylococcus infections, Stephens Johnson syndrome, syphilitic chancre, thromboembolic effects of Leishmaniasis, toxic epidermal necrolyis, shingles, early chicken pox lesions, bites from other arthropods and idiopathic dermal necrosis have all been misdiagnosed as spider bites. Almost all bites from spiders are inflicted by the spider in self defense, when a human inadvertently upsets or invades the spider’s space. Of spiders in the United States capable of biting, only a few are considered dangerous to human beings. Bites from the following species of spiders can result in serious sequelae: Louisiana Office of Public Health – Infectious Disease Epidemiology Section Page 1 of 14 The Brown Recluse: Loxosceles reclusa Photo Courtesy of the Texas Department of State Health Services The most common species associated with medically important spider bites: • Physical characteristics o Length: Approximately 1 inch o Appearance: A violin shaped mark can be visualized on the dorsum (top).
    [Show full text]
  • Catching the Complexity of Salmon-Louse Interactions
    Fish and Shellfish Immunology 90 (2019) 199–209 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fish and Shellfish Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fsi Full length article Catching the complexity of salmon-louse interactions T ∗ Cristian Gallardo-Escáratea, , Valentina Valenzuela-Muñoza, Gustavo Núñez-Acuñaa, Crisleri Carreraa, Ana Teresa Gonçalvesa, Diego Valenzuela-Mirandaa, Bárbara P. Benaventea, Steven Robertsb a Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research, Laboratory of Biotechnology and Aquatic Genomics, Department of Oceanography, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile b School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (SAFS), University of Washington, Seattle, USA ABSTRACT The study of host-parasite relationships is an integral part of the immunology of aquatic species, where the complexity of both organisms has to be overlayed with the lifecycle stages of the parasite and immunological status of the host. A deep understanding of how the parasite survives in its host and how they display molecular mechanisms to face the immune system can be applied for novel parasite control strategies. This review highlights current knowledge about salmon and sea louse, two key aquatic animals for aquaculture research worldwide. With the aim to catch the complexity of the salmon-louse interactions, molecular information gleaned through genomic studies are presented. The host recognition system and the chemosensory receptors found in sea lice reveal complex molecular components, that in turn, can be disrupted through specific molecules such as non-coding RNAs. 1. Introduction worldwide the most studied sea lice species are Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus rogercresseyi [8–10]. Annually the salmon industry presents Host-parasite interactions are a complex relationship where one estimated losses of US $ 480 million, representing between 4 and 10% organism benefits the other and often where there is a negative impact of production costs [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Piscirickettsia Salmonis and the Sea Louse Caligus Rogercresseyi
    Disease Resistance in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar): Coinfection of the Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis and the Sea Louse Caligus rogercresseyi Jean Paul Lhorente1, Jose´ A. Gallardo2*, Beatriz Villanueva3, Marı´a J. Caraban˜ o3, Roberto Neira1,4 1 Aquainnovo S.A, Puerto Montt, Chile, 2 Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica de Valparaı´so, Valparaı´so, Chile, 3 Departamento de Mejora Gene´tica Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain, 4 Departamento de Produccio´n Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Agrono´micas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Abstract Background: Naturally occurring coinfections of pathogens have been reported in salmonids, but their consequences on disease resistance are unclear. We hypothesized that 1) coinfection of Caligus rogercresseyi reduces the resistance of Atlantic salmon to Piscirickettsia salmonis; and 2) coinfection resistance is a heritable trait that does not correlate with resistance to a single infection. Methodology: In total, 1,634 pedigreed Atlantic salmon were exposed to a single infection (SI) of P. salmonis (primary pathogen) or coinfection with C. rogercresseyi (secondary pathogen). Low and high level of coinfection were evaluated (LC = 44 copepodites per fish; HC = 88 copepodites per fish). Survival and quantitative genetic analyses were performed to determine the resistance to the single infection and coinfections. Main Findings: C. rogercresseyi significantly increased the mortality in fish infected with P. salmonis (SI mortality = 251/545; LC mortality = 544/544 and HC mortality = 545/545). Heritability estimates for resistance to P. salmonis were similar and of 2 2 2 medium magnitude in all treatments (h SI = 0.2360.07; h LC = 0.1760.08; h HC = 0.2460.07). A large and significant genetic correlation with regard to resistance was observed between coinfection treatments (rg LC-HC = 0.9960.01) but not between the single and coinfection treatments (rg SI-LC = 20.1460.33; rg SI-HC = 0.3260.34).
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Parasite Interaction of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) and the Ectoparasite Neoparamoeba Perurans in Amoebic Gill Disease
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 31 May 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.672700 Host-Parasite Interaction of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the Ectoparasite Neoparamoeba perurans in Amoebic Gill Disease † Natasha A. Botwright 1*, Amin R. Mohamed 1 , Joel Slinger 2, Paula C. Lima 1 and James W. Wynne 3 1 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD, Australia, 2 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Woorim, QLD, Australia, 3 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Hobart, TAS, Australia Marine farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are susceptible to recurrent amoebic gill disease Edited by: (AGD) caused by the ectoparasite Neoparamoeba perurans over the growout production Samuel A. M. Martin, University of Aberdeen, cycle. The parasite elicits a highly localized response within the gill epithelium resulting in United Kingdom multifocal mucoid patches at the site of parasite attachment. This host-parasite response Reviewed by: drives a complex immune reaction, which remains poorly understood. To generate a model Diego Robledo, for host-parasite interaction during pathogenesis of AGD in Atlantic salmon the local (gill) and University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom systemic transcriptomic response in the host, and the parasite during AGD pathogenesis was Maria K. Dahle, explored. A dual RNA-seq approach together with differential gene expression and system- Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI), Norway wide statistical analyses of gene and transcription factor networks was employed. A multi- *Correspondence: tissue transcriptomic data set was generated from the gill (including both lesioned and non- Natasha A. Botwright lesioned tissue), head kidney and spleen tissues naïve and AGD-affected Atlantic salmon [email protected] sourced from an in vivo AGD challenge trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Incidents Between Humans and Orcas in Captivity
    Violent incidents between humans and orcas in captivity Several accounts of violent incidents with humans have appeared in books and news clips, with little information on the dates or details of those incidents. Other descriptions have made headlines, and some were captured on video tape. There are also anecdotal reports of incidents that were never officially documented. NO. DATE AQUARIUM WHALEs INCIDENT SOURCE early years New York When water level was lowered for pool cleaning, young female Lupa sent Edward R. Riciuti, , New #1 1968 Lupa York, Walker & Co., 1973, Aquarium, USA trainers scrambling from the pool, snapping her jaws threatening. pp. 227-228. Edward R. Riciuti, Killers of the Sea, New York, Young male Cuddles became so increasingly aggressive, having a hold of at Walker & Co., 1973, pp. Flamingo Park, least two trainers, that keepers had to clean the pool from the protection of a 227-228; Reading #2 1969-1970 Cuddles England shark cage. Cuddles also dragged keeper Don Robinson into the pool when he Eagle, August 15, was at Dudley Zoo but that was possibly a PR stunt. 1971; Doug Cartlidge, personal communication, March 2010. Karen Pryor writes, "I have since heard... of at least one killer whale which Karen Pryor, Lads Before the Wind, New York, #3 1970s unknown unknown launched an unprovoked attack on a favorite trainer, in normal circumstances, Harper & Row, 1976, p. savaged him very badly, and nearly killed him." 220. Vancouver Trainer Doug Pemberton described young female Skana as the dominant Cranky killer whales put trainers through their #4 1970's Aquarium, Skana animal in the pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Awareness, Prevention and Treatment of World-Wide Marine Stings and Bites
    Awareness, Prevention and Treatment of world-wide marine stings and bites Dr Peter Fenner Honorary Medical Officer, Surf Life Saving Australia International Life Saving Federation Medical/Rescue Conference Proceedings September 1997 Abstract The most common world-wide first aid treatment used by the average lifesaver/lifeguard is the treatment of marine envenomation, especially the treatment of jellyfish stings. It is important to use the correct first aid treatment for each type of envenomation. This study provides a simplified protocol for: - 1. Awareness of the geographical distribution and possibilities of envenomation enabling: - 2. Preventative strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality from marine envenomation 3. First aid treatment of marine envenomation by jellyfish or other marine animals This discussion is based on protocols developed for Surf Life Saving Australia and other first aid providers in Australia over the past ten years. Their success has been proven by a 30% reduction in the number of stings over the past 10 years (statistics from the author’s records). Information for this article has been taken from: - 1. Venomous and poisonous marine animals: a medical and biological handbook produced by Surf Life Saving Queensland 2. The global problem of cnidarian stinging. MD Thesis by the author for the University of London. Introduction The global problem of marine envenomation is not fully appreciated. Each year hundreds of deaths occur from poisoning (by ingestion or eating) or by envenomation (stinging by jellyfish, or biting by venomous marine animals). The morbidity is even greater with jellyfish stings world-wide being numbered in their millions. Each summer it is estimated that up to half a million stings occur on the east coast of the United States from the Portuguese man-o’-war (Physalia physalis).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Harmful and Toxic Creatures in the Goa of Jordan
    Published by the Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan. P. O. Box 831051, Abdel Aziz El Thaalbi St., Shmesani 11183. Amman Copyright: © The Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written approval from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. ISBN: 978-9957-8740-1-8 Deposit Number at the National Library: 2619/6/2016 Citation: Eid, E and Al Tawaha, M. (2016). A Guide to Harmful and Toxic Creature in the Gulf of Aqaba of Jordan. The Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan. ISBN: 978-9957-8740-1-8. Pp 84. Material was reviewed by Dr Nidal Al Oran, International Research Center for Water, Environment and Energy\ Al Balqa’ Applied University,and Dr. Omar Attum from Indiana University Southeast at the United State of America. Cover page: Vlad61; Shutterstock Library All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder, and it should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without permission. 1 Content Index of Creatures Described in this Guide ......................................................... 5 Preface ................................................................................................................ 6 Part One: Introduction ......................................................................................... 8 1.1 The Gulf of Aqaba; Jordan ......................................................................... 8 1.2 Aqaba;
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Parasitic Copepods and Their Hosts in the Western Wadden Sea in 1968 and 2010
    INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch NNIOZIOZ KKoninklijkoninklijk NNederlandsederlands IInstituutnstituut vvooroor ZZeeonderzoekeeonderzoek INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch Texel, April 2012 NIOZ Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Zeeonderzoek Cover illustration The parasitic copepod Lernaeenicus sprattae (Sowerby, 1806) on its fish host, the sprat (Sprattus sprattus) Copyright by Hans Hillewaert, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license; CC-BY-SA-3.0; Wikipedia Contents 1. Summary 6 2. Introduction 7 3. Methods 7 4. Results 8 5. Discussion 9 6. Acknowledgements 10 7. References 10 8. Appendices 12 1. Summary Ectoparasites, attaching mainly to the fins or gills, are a particularly conspicuous part of the parasite fauna of marine fishes. In particular the dominant copepods, have received much interest due to their effects on host populations. However, still little is known on the copepod fauna on fishes for many localities and their temporal stability as long-term observations are largely absent. The aim of this project was two-fold: 1) to deliver a current inventory of ectoparasitic copepods in fishes in the southern Wadden Sea around Texel and 2) to compare the current parasitic copepod fauna with the one from 1968 in the same area, using data published in an internal NIOZ report and additional unpublished original notes. In total, 47 parasite species have been recorded on 52 fish species in the southern Wadden Sea to date. The two copepod species, where quantitative comparisons between 1968 and 2010 were possible for their host, the European flounder (Platichthys flesus), showed different trends: Whereas Acanthochondria cornuta seems not to have altered its infection rate or per host abundance between years, Lepeophtheirus pectoralis has shifted towards infection of smaller hosts, as well as to a stronger increase of per-host abundance with increasing host length.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.2-Assessment of Harmful Algae Bloom
    Maryland’s Coastal Bays: Ecosystem Health Assessment Chapter 6.2 Chapter 6.2 Assessment of harmful algae bloom species in the Maryland Coastal Bays Catherine Wazniak Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment, Annapolis, MD 21401 Abstract Thirteen potentially harmful algae taxa have been identified in the Maryland Coastal Bays: Aureococcus anophagefferens (brown tide), Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae, Chloromorum/ Chattonella spp., Heterosigma akashiwo, Fibrocapsa japonica, Prorocentrum minimum, Dinophysis spp., Amphidinium spp., Pseudo-nitzchia spp., Karlodinium micrum and two macroalgae genera (Gracilaria, Chaetomorpha). Presence of potentially toxic species is richest in the polluted tributaries of St. Martin River and Newport Bay. Approximately 5% of the phytoplankton species identified for Maryland’s Coastal Bays represent potentially harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. The HABs are recognized for their potentially toxic properties and, in some cases, their ability to produce large blooms negatively affecting light and dissolved oxygen resources. Brown tide (Aureococcus anophagefferens) has been the most widespread and prolific HAB species in the area in recent years, producing growth impacts to juvenile clams in test studies and potential impacts to sea grass distribution and growth (see Chapter 7.1). Macroalgal fluctuations may be evidence of a system balancing on the edge of a eutrophic (nutrient- enriched) state (see chapter 4). No evidence of toxic activity has been detected among the Coastal Bays phytoplankton. However, species such as Pseudo-nitzschia seriata, Prorocentrum minimum, Pfiesteria piscicida, Dinophysis acuminata and Karlodinium micrum have produced positive toxic bioassays or generated detectable toxins in Chesapeake Bay. Pfiesteria piscicida was retrospectively considered as the likely causative organism in a large historical fish kill on the Indian River, Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eukaryotic Life on Microplastics in Brackish Ecosystems
    Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Marie Therese Kettner | Sonja Oberbeckmann | Matthias Labrenz Hans-Peter Grossart The Eukaryotic Life on Microplastics in Brackish Ecosystems Suggested citation referring to the original publication: Frontiers in Microbiology 10 (2019), Art. 538 DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00766 ISSN (online) 1664-302X Postprint archived at the Institutional Repository of the Potsdam University in: Postprints der Universität Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 741 ISSN 1866-8372 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434996 DOI https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-43499 fmicb-10-00538 March 19, 2019 Time: 17:29 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 20 March 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00538 The Eukaryotic Life on Microplastics in Brackish Ecosystems Marie Therese Kettner1,2, Sonja Oberbeckmann3, Matthias Labrenz3 and Hans-Peter Grossart1,2* 1 Department of Experimental Limnology, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany, 2 Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, 3 Environmental Microbiology Working Group, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany Microplastics (MP) constitute a widespread contaminant all over the globe. Rivers and wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) transport annually several million tons of MP into freshwaters, estuaries and oceans, where they provide increasing artificial surfaces for microbial colonization. As knowledge on MP-attached communities is insufficient for brackish ecosystems, we conducted exposure experiments in the coastal Baltic Sea, an in-flowing river and a WWTP within the drainage basin. While reporting on prokaryotic and fungal communities from the same set-up previously, we focus here on the entire eukaryotic communities.
    [Show full text]