DOCSLIB.ORG

Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift. # Verantwortliche Redacteure: Julius Lederer und Ludwig Miller. VI lt.111,1. Wien, 1862. fn Conmiission bei Carl Gerold's Sohn. 1 S%1$^ v,4 Register. Seite Seite Seite Abraxas interruptaria 39. Argynnis Anadyomene 23 Cyme chinensis 36. Aciptilus volgensis 143 Nerippe 24. Acraea Callianthe 417 Asthenia geometraria 188. Daedaltna Dorinda 427. Eresia 417. Athyrtis Mechanitis 414. Depressaria venosulella Negra 78. ^drtactts TPaMrari 34. 142. Terpsinoe 78. .4MaJus jonicus 344. JDianthoecia Christophi Trinacria 417. 235. Acronycta Orientalis 370. Baridius jonicus 280. Dircenna Panthyale 414. Aglaope fasciata 32. Batesia Hypochlora 113. Bischistus nigriceps 164. Agraulis Lucina 110. Berytus pilicornis 45 Dolichopus hilaris 297. Agriotes murinus 343. »•otfMtttfatMs 44. Dorycera hybrida 172. Agrotis comparata 131. Blepharoptera a'pina 299. septentrionalis 133. Botys biternalis 385. Empis Haemi 168. Staudingeri 132. lutosalis 386. nigerrlma 171. Woctoe 130 tenutalis 387. rai'a 170. -<4Zoa leucotharax 36. saxicolalis 387. Ejiialus hyperboreus 129. Ancistrocampta Syllitus Brachyglenis Esthema 73. Epiphile negrina 111. 184. Brahmaea undulata 35. Eresia Berenice HO. Androcharta Meones 231 Brephos infans 134. Ca.s<eMa. 419. Anophthalmvs 327 Milleri '. Eronia Boebera 288. -4«<Aeraea Pernyi 34 Callicore Lidvnna 114. Phocaea 288. Antirrhaea Geryon 426. Callidryas Wallacei 68. Erycina Callias 71 -He/a 124. Catagramma Salamis 114. Laodomia 71. Lindigii 425. Chaetoneura Hippalus Esthema plagifera 230. Philaretes 424. 186. Eubagis Salpensa 113. Philopoemen 425. Ca«'s Theodora 72. Eudamus Atletes 183. ^./'atttra Griseldis 117. Cidaria phocata 137. Orj/a> 188. Are 27. Conchylis porculana 394. Po)-C!M5 182. japonica 27. sa?«6»-a«a 395. T'bfettmus 182. Linda 117. Conognathus Piaton 181. Eurema Lindigii 420. Apion montanuin 348. Cryptolechia sareptensis Eunica Auracana 421. Arctioplepds rubida 33. 141. Ptora 111. II Seite Seite Seite Olympias 420. Epicliai-me 77. Manilana 290. Phasis 111. Excelsa 415. Orpheus 292. JEunomia dubia 231. Susiana 416. T/teda 291. Eurybia Donna 410. PAaro 76. Franciscana 70. lthomiopsis Astrca 412. Necyria Lindiyii 411. Euterpe Calymnia 67. Corena 412. Neonympha fallax 177. Leueadia 67. Pimpla 177. Lasiommata JJremeri 28. Nephopteryx insignella Grapholitha nigritana Aluirheadii 28. 391. 397. Lecithocera ßavissimella florella 391. 402. Nepticula aeneella 254. JJaetera Ilorlensia 124. Leptalis Arcadia 410. aeneofasciella 262. P/cra 176. Cordillera 409. agrimoniella 312. Haltica ambigua 52. Leptocircus Decius 284. al/netella 266. Chrysanthemi 51. Leucidia Elphos 69. angulifasciella 314. Mathewsii 54. JLispa pilosa 298. arcitateMa 315. obtusata 52. Longitarsus Absinthii atricapitella 256. rustica 49. 217. atricollis 313. Halticinen 47, 97, 215. aenetts 107. basigutdla 258. JJaptocnemus rufipes 345. Anchusae 219. betulicola 303. Heliconius Aerotome 79. apicalis 224. continuella 301. Aglaeope 79. Corynthius 215. distinguenda 305. Amaryllis 80. cuprinus 108. dulcella 267. Cassandra 418. £c/tü 105. fragariella 263. Euphone 418. fuscoaeneus 106. ylutinosae 306. JWiaca 418. holsaticus 225. hemargyrella 310. Atessene 418. Linnei 104. inaequalis 302. Hettrochroa Urraca 116. nie/er 220. latifasciella 260. Ximena 116. obliteratus 216. luteeUa 308. Ilomoeochroma Aletis 229. yowvwius 223. myrtillella 317. Hydroporus jonicus 276. 4-pustulatus 227. nitidella 257. Hypolycaena Astyla 294. rectilinealus 221. Nylandriella 259. Tharrytas 294. Lycorea Pales 75. obliquella 316. r»M>«i*s 293. Lygris lugubrata 136. pomella 253. Uyponomeuta polystig- poterii 304. mellus 40. Mechanitis Idae 414. pretiosa 261. Merodon graecus 165. rubivora 315. /wo chinensis 31. Mesosemia Phelina 411. samiatella 25.'i. volg&nsis 139. Monetha Albertus 73. simpücella 317. Isognathus Swainsonii Morpho Iphiclus 423. speciosa 265. 187. Myrina discophora 290. turicella 309. Jsotheinon laniprospilus Jalajala 292. ulmivora Mi'i. 30. Lazarena 293. Weaweri 319. Jthomia Agarista Tl. Lefebvrei 291. iYoia impura 368. III Seite Seite Seite Nymphalis Anassa 120. obsoteta 289. /',,, rhogyra Lysanias 115. Eurypile 119. tagalica 289. Glauce 119. Phaeochlaena Josia 230. /W aphidogn a th a sesiae- Glaucone 119. Phalera ningpoana 37 forrnis 32. Leuctra 119. Phareas Priscus 184. Rhicnoessa cinerea 175. Nymphidhim Calyce 72. Phthoroblastis Christo- Rhyparia grandaria 38. phana 140. Sangala sacrata Olina Cecilia 121. Phyllo'ius Apollinis 350. 229. Sciaphila nodulana Opsiphanes Cassina 122 morifamjs 351. 140. Scolopocneme Orchestes hirtellus 353. Pieris Agave 286. bufonia 38. Sepedon hispanicus Orestias Vitula 73. Asterope 286. 300. »Sesja luctuosa 365. Ornithoptera Magellanus Bianca 284. Siculodes str/gatula 282. Boisduvaliana 287. 40. Siderone Orthogonia Sera 38. Domitia 285. Eurymanthus Oliorhynchus Jovis 352. iifana 287. 422. Oxynetra semihyalina iuzonensis 285. Futemu« 421. Stauronotus anulipes 180. Nathalia 285. 81. St icliophtlialma Nephele 287. Howqua Pamphilo Confucius 29. Zamboanga 285 28. Syntomis Pachnephorus rugaticollis Zarnora 286. germana 37. 281. Platynochaetus Macquarti Muirheadii 37. Papilla Anaximenes 65. 296. Taygetis Calliomma 426. Euphrates 283. Platystoma subfasciata Cleopatra 176. Eurotas 66. 173. Tenas -4W?Aa 289. J lipponous 283. Plesioneura curvifascia -4nemorae 23. Iiystaspes 283. 29. Tatanops psammopliila Melanthus 283. Polydrosus jucundus 349. 173. Mencius 22. Pootophanes crassicauda Thecia grandis 24. Pammon 22. 163. Thiridia Ino 75. Paraplesia Adelmia 26. Pterigospidea sinica 30. Tinagma vibratoriella Lycomedon 423. Pterophorus Oxyptilus) ( 404. Telemanius 422. Poggei 409. Tortrix algidana 138. Pavonia Euphorbus 123. I'terostichus filigranus Phaedra nesophila 289. 322. Volucella elegans 294. I n h a 1 t. Nr. 1. Jänner. riehriigo zu einer Critik der von Fieber in den Jahren 1858 bis I8ßl veröffentlichten Schriften über Khynchoton von Dr. Gustav Flor. S. 1. Observationes de Lepidoptcris nonnullis Chinac centralis et Japoniae, rmnmunicatae a C. et E. Felder. S. 21. - Anzeige. S 32. Nr. 2. Februar. Observationes de Lepidopteris nonnullis Cbinae centralis et Japoniae, conimunicntao a C. et R. Felder. (Schluss.) S. 33. - Beitrage zu einer Critik der von Fieber in den Jahren is.is bis istil veröffentlichten Schriften über Rhynohoten von Dr. Gustav Flor. (Schluss.) S. 40. — Zwei neue europ. Jthynchota heteroptera aus der Gattung Jin-utu* von Dr. (!. Flor. S. 13. — Beiträge zur Kenntnis« der europäischen Haltioinan. Von F. Kutschera (Fortsetzung.) S.(4p - {Jeher Dioohvu Er. und UhtgmatootriM M otseb. Von Dr. Q. Kraatz. S. (SB. Nr. 3. März. Specinien faunae lepidopterologiene riparum fluminis Ncgro suporioris in Hrasilia scptentrionali nuetoribus C. etil. Felder. S. 65. — Für Nicder- Hsterreichs Fauna neue Orthopteren. Von Rud. Türk. S. 81. — Uücher-An- Beigen. Von J. Lederer. S. 82. — Nur logisch. Von J l.ederer. S. 91. - Anceige. — Berichtigung. S, 911. Nr- 4. April. Beitrüge zur Kenntniss der europäischen Haltioinen. Von F. Kut- Bchera. (FortsetaungO S^j— Specinien faunae lepidopterologicae riparum lluininis Negro suporioris in Brasilia scptentrionali nuetoribus C. et R. Felder. (l'ontinuatio.) Novae - Jlclmnvzidnrum in Europa viventium species, de- sciiptne n II. I.llw. S. i id. Nr. 6. Mai, Beiträge aur Sohmetterlings-Fauna von Labrador. Von H. B. Moschler. S. 12!). - Neue südrussisebe Scbiuetterlinge. Von II. H. .');). Mose liier. S. | - Vorläufiger Commentar zum diptarologisoben Theile der Fauna austriaca. Von Dr. .). R. Sohiner. S. I,;i. - Ueber Nacbtfang von Dr. A. Kessler. B. loa, Replik. Von J. l.ederer. S. iB7. - Ueber sohleohtes Bericht. Von Dr. •: Kraata S. IM. Anzeige, s 189, Nr. 6. Juni. Ueber einige bei Varna gefangene Dipteren. Von Dr. H. T.üw. S. 161, — Specimen faunae lepidopterologicae liparuni fluminis Negro supeiioris in Brasilia septentrionali auctoribus C. et R. Felder. (Continuatio.) S. 175. — Bücher- Anzeigen. Von J. Lederer S. 193. Nr. 7. Juli. Ueber die in Europa vorkommenden Tettix-Arten. Von Rud. Türk. S. 205. — Zur Naturgeschichte von Bapta pictaria Curt. und Epione vespertaria L. Von Dr. A. Rössler. S. 212. — Beiträge zur Kenntniss der europäischen Halticinen. Von F. Kutschera. (Fortsetzung.) S. 215. — Spe- cimen faunae lepidopterologicae riparum fluminis Negro supeiioris in Brasilia septentrionali auctoribus C. et R. Felder. (Conclusio.) S. 229. — Dianthoecia Christophi n. sp. Beschrieben von H. B. Möschler. S. «35. — Bitte. S. 236. Nr. 8. August. Einige Bemerkungen über die Arten der Gattung Nepticula. Von H. von Heine mann. S. 237. — Anzeigen. S. 268. Nr. 9. September. Ergebnisse einer entomologischen Reise nach Cephalonia. Von L. Miller. S. 269. — Lepidoptera nova a C. et R.Felder. S. 282. — Sechs neue europäische Dipteren. Beschrieben von Dr. H. Low. S. 294. — An- zeige. S. 300. Nr. 10. October. Einige Bemerkungen über die Gattung Nepticula von H. von Heine- mann. (Schluss.) S. 301. — Ergebnisse einer entomol. Reise nach Cephalonien. Von L. Miller. (Fortsetzung.) S. 320. — Ein neuer Grottenkäfer aus Un- garn. Von Johann von Frivaldszky. S. 327. — Lepidopterologische Bei- träge. Von A. Gärtner. S. 328. — Bücher-Anzeigen. S. 332. Nr. 11. November. Ergebnisse einer entomologischen Reise nach Cephalonia. Von L. Mi 11 er. (Schluss.) S. 333. — Verzeichniss der im Jahre 1851 bei Brussa in Kleinasien gesammelten Schmetterlinge. Von Jos. Mann. S. 356. — Ueber Machaerites spelacus Mill. und Bytlioxenus subterraneus Motsch. von I.. Miller. S. 372. — Anzeige. S. 372. Nr. 12. Secember. Verzeichniss der im
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bayle-Barelle 1808) (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae, Procridinae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stapfia Jahr/Year: 1998 Band/Volume: 0055 Autor(en)/Author(s): Tarmann Gerhard Michael Artikel/Article: Die Weinzygaene Theresimima ampellophaga (Bayle-Barelle 1808) (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae, Procridinae). Kehrt ein verschwundener Weinschädling zurück? 57-84 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Stapfia 55 57-84 11. September 1998 Die Weinzygaene Theresimima ampellophaga (BAYLE-BARELLE 1808) (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae, Procridinae) Kehrt ein verschwundener Weinschädling zurück?* Gerhard M. TARMANN Abstract: The Vine Bud Moth or European Grapeleaf Skeletonizer Theresimima ampellophaga (BAYLE-BARELLE 1808) - reappearence of a vine pest? The Vine Bud Moth or European Grapleaf Skeletonizer Theresimima ampellophaga (BAYLE- BARELLE 1808) was thought to be under control for many years. The last harmful infestations are recorded from Hungary in 1954 (ISSEKUTZ 1957a, 1957b). Only a few records are known from later years. A possible reason for the decline of populations may be found in more effective use of pesticide and insecticide. In 1990 Th. ampellophaga was rediscovered on Crimea (Ukraine) after almost 50 years of absence (EFETOV 1990b). For the first time the larvae were found on decorative vines (Parthenocissus). Between 1990 and 1997 the Vine Bud Moth spread all over southern Crimea and has developed very strong populations. This fact leads to the conclusion that neighbouring countries might be in immediate danger. The present paper gives an overview about historical and recent observations of Th. ampellophaga with special emphasis to the situation on Crimea. Pheromone recognition and pest control methods are mentioned. The systematic position and the historical and recent geographical distributions are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental, Cellular and Biochemical Basis of Transparency in Clearwing Butterflies Aaron F
    © 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2021) 224, jeb237917. doi:10.1242/jeb.237917 RESEARCH ARTICLE Developmental, cellular and biochemical basis of transparency in clearwing butterflies Aaron F. Pomerantz1,2,*, Radwanul H. Siddique3,4, Elizabeth I. Cash5, Yuriko Kishi6,7, Charline Pinna8, Kasia Hammar2, Doris Gomez9, Marianne Elias8 and Nipam H. Patel1,2,6,* ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The wings of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are typically covered The wings of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) have inspired with thousands of flat, overlapping scales that endow the wings with studies across a variety of scientific fields, including evolutionary colorful patterns. Yet, numerous species of Lepidoptera have evolved biology, ecology and biophysics (Beldade and Brakefield, 2002; highly transparent wings, which often possess scales of altered Prum et al., 2006; Gilbert and Singer, 1975). Lepidopteran wings morphology and reduced size, and the presence of membrane are generally covered with rows of flat, partially overlapping surface nanostructures that dramatically reduce reflection. Optical scales that endow the wings with colorful patterns. Adult scales are properties and anti-reflective nanostructures have been characterized chitin-covered projections that serve as the unit of color for the wing. for several ‘clearwing’ Lepidoptera, but the developmental processes Each scale can generate color through pigmentation via molecules underlying wing transparency are unknown. Here, we applied that selectively absorb certain wavelengths of light, structural confocal and electron microscopy to create a developmental time coloration, which results from light interacting with the physical series in the glasswing butterfly, Greta oto, comparing transparent nanoarchitecture of the scale; or a combination of both pigmentary and non-transparent wing regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Taxonomic and Functional Approaches to Unravel the Spatial Distribution of an Amazonian Butterfly Community
    Environmental Entomology Advance Access published December 7, 2015 Environmental Entomology, 2015, 1–9 doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv183 Community and Ecosystem Ecology Research article Combining Taxonomic and Functional Approaches to Unravel the Spatial Distribution of an Amazonian Butterfly Community Marlon B. Grac¸a,1,2,3 Jose´W. Morais,1 Elizabeth Franklin,1,2 Pedro A. C. L. Pequeno,1,2 Jorge L. P. Souza,1,2 and Anderson Saldanha Bueno,1,4 1Biodiversity Coordination, National Institute for Amazonian Research, INPA, Manaus, Brazil ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]), 2Center for Integrated Studies of Amazonian Biodiversity, CENBAM, Manaus, Brazil, 3Corresponding author, e-mail: marlon_lgp@hotmail. com, and 4Campus Ju´lio de Castilhos, Farroupilha Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Brazil ([email protected]) Received 24 August 2015; Accepted 10 November 2015 Abstract This study investigated the spatial distribution of an Amazonian fruit-feeding butterfly assemblage by linking spe- cies taxonomic and functional approaches. We hypothesized that: 1) vegetation richness (i.e., resources) and abun- dance of insectivorous birds (i.e., predators) should drive changes in butterfly taxonomic composition, 2) larval diet breadth should decrease with increase of plant species richness, 3) small-sized adults should be favored by higher abundance of birds, and 4) communities with eyespot markings should be able to exploit areas with higher predation pressure. Fruit-feeding butterflies were sampled with bait traps and insect nets across 25 km2 of an Amazonian ombrophilous forest in Brazil. We measured larval diet breadth, adult body size, and wing marking of all butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera
    CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Species Definitions and Nomenclature of the Rose Colored Cithaerias Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae)
    Zootaxa 3873 (5): 541–559 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3873.5.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:05BD334C-493D-4688-92E8-602943ECF57D Revised species definitions and nomenclature of the rose colored Cithaerias butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) CARLA M. PENZ1, LAURA G. ALEXANDER2 & PHILIP J. DEVRIES3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lakeshore Dr. New Orleans, LA 70148, USA. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This study provides updated species definitions for five rose-colored Cithaerias butterflies, starting with a historical over- view of their taxonomy. Given their mostly transparent wings, genitalia morphology yielded the most reliable characters for species definition and identification. Genitalic divergence is more pronounced when multiple species occur in sympa- try than between parapatric taxa. Cithaerias aurorina is granted full species status, C. cliftoni is reinstated as a full species, and one new combination is proposed, i.e. C. aurora tambopata. Two new synonyms are proposed, Callitaera phantoma and Callitaera aura = Cithaerias aurora. Key words: pireta, menander, aurorina, cliftoni, aurora, aura, phantoma, pyritosa Introduction Some of the most visually striking Neotropical butterflies belong to the genus Cithaerias Hübner (Satyrinae, Haeterini), which inhabit sea level to mid-elevation rainforests from Mexico through Central and South America. A characteristic of all Cithaerias species is their mostly transparent wings with the distal portions of the hind wing overlaid with partially lustrous rose, purple or blue scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Manuscript Template
    Developmental, cellular, and biochemical basis of transparency in clearwing butterflies Aaron F. Pomerantz1,2,*, Radwanul H. Siddique3,4, Elizabeth I. Cash5, Yuriko Kishi6,7, Charline Pinna8, Kasia Hammar2, Doris Gomez9, Marianne Elias8, Nipam H. Patel1,2,6,* 1Department Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. 2Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543. 3Image Sensor Lab, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., 2 N Lake Ave. Ste. 240, Pasadena, CA 91101. 4Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. 5Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. 6Department Molecular Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. 7Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. 8ISYEB, 45 rue Buffon, CP50, Paris, CNRS, MNHN, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, France. 9CEFE, 1919 route de Mende, Montpellier, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, France. * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Summary Statement: Transparency is a fascinating, yet poorly studied, optical property in living organisms. Here, we elucidate the developmental processes underlying scale and nanostructure formation in glasswing butterflies, and their roles in generating anti-reflective properties. © 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd. Journal of Experimental Biology • Accepted manuscript This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed Abstract The wings of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are typically covered with thousands of flat, overlapping scales that endow the wings with colorful patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Eastern and Australian Lepidoptera Heterocera in The
    XCATALOGUE OF EASTERN AND AUSTRALIAN LEPIDOPTERA HETEROCERA /N THE COLLECTION OF THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY MUSEUM COLONEL C. SWINHOE F.L.S., F.Z.S., F.E.S. PART I SPHINGES AND BOMB WITH EIGHT PLAJOES 0;cfor5 AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1892 PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRKSS EY HORACE HART, PRINT .!< TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE At the request of Professor Westwood, and under the orders and sanction of the Delegates of the Press, this work is being produced as a students' handbook to all the Eastern Moths in the Oxford University Museum, including chiefly the Walkerian types of the moths collected by Wal- lace in the Malay Archipelago, which for many years have been lost sight of and forgotten for want of a catalogue of reference. The Oxford University Museum collection of moths is very largely a collection of the types of Hope, Saunders, Walker, and Moore, many of the type specimens being unique and of great scientific value. All Walker's types mentioned in his Catalogue of Hetero- cerous Lepidoptera in the British Museum as ' in coll. Saun- ders ' should be in the Oxford Museum, as also the types of all the species therein mentioned by him as described in Trans. Ent. Soc, Lond., 3rd sen vol. i. The types of all the species mentioned in Walker's cata- logue which have a given locality preceding the lettered localties showing that they are in the British Museum should also be in the Oxford Museum. In so far as this work has proceeded this has been proved to be the case by the correct- vi PREFACE.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Studies on the Consortes of the Norway Rat in Utah County, Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1951-08-01 Some studies on the consortes of the Norway rat in Utah county, Utah Roy J. Myklebust Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Myklebust, Roy J., "Some studies on the consortes of the Norway rat in Utah county, Utah" (1951). Theses and Dissertations. 7835. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7835 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. •· \ QL '· '..., ,.oz_ , ~\05 \qs\ SOMES'l'UDIES ON TEE CONSORl.ESOJ' THI NORWAYRAT IN UTAHOOUNTY• UTAH A. TB.ISIS SUBMl'l'ffD TO THE DEPARl'MEN'l'OF ZOOLOGY.AND J.ffl'OMOLOGYAND '.l'l:IE GRAW.ATE SOBOOL or BRIGHAM YOUNGtmlv.lRSITY IN P.ARrlALFUUIL1Ml!:tfr 01 THE D.t,UIRBMEN'l'SJOR THE DEGREE 01 MASTEROJ' SOD:NCE BY ROY 1. MJKIJmUS1' AUGUS?,1951 This thesis by Roy 1. Myklebust 1s accepted 1n its present tom. b7 the I>epan• the Thesis requirements tor the degree ot Master ot Science. Signed: Thesis Ccmmittae 11 l Wish to extend rq sincere appreciation to Dr. D. Eld.en Beck• As1001ate Professor 1n the Depa:rtmiant ot zoology and Entomology-at Briaha.m Young tJDiversi • tor his ready and unstinted senioes in the dn-eloJ;ID8nt ot an4 S11ggestiona to this atua.y, and tor his preparation and 1dent1f1cat1on ot the S1phonaptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Revision of the “Pierella Lamia Species Group” (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species from Brazil
    Zootaxa 4078 (1): 366–386 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4078.1.31 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:203F313A-5A03-4514-A5F3-BB315A6B7FF6 Taxonomic revision of the “Pierella lamia species group” (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) with descriptions of four new species from Brazil THAMARA ZACCA1,3, RICARDO R. SIEWERT1, MIRNA M. CASAGRANDE1, OLAF H. H. MIELKE1 & MÁRLON PALUCH2 1Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Estudos de Lepidoptera Neotropical, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531–980, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 2Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias Ambientais e Biológicas, Setor de Biologia, 44380–000, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil. 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Four new species of Pierella Westwood, 1851 from Brazil are described: P. angeloi Zacca, Siewert & Mielke sp. nov. from Maranhão, P. kesselringi Zacca, Siewert & Paluch sp. nov. from Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Sergipe, P. nice Zacca, Siewert & Paluch sp. nov. from Bahia and P. keithbrowni Siewert, Zacca & Casagrande sp. nov. from Bahia, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná and Santa Catarina. Additionally, P. chalybaea Godman, 1905 stat. rest. and P. bo- liviana F.M. Brown, 1948 stat. nov. are recognized as valid species and not as subspecies of P. l am i a (Sulzer, 1776), while P. l. colombiana Constantino & Salazar, 2007 syn. nov. is synonymized to the former. Lectotype and paralectotype of Pap- ilio dyndimene Cramer, 1779 (a synonym of Pierella lamia) and Pierella chalybaea Godman, 1905 stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Evidence Supports Recognition Of
    Morphological and molecular evidence supports recognition of Cithaerias cliftoni (Constantino, 1995) as a species distinct from C. pireta (Stoll, 1780) and C. aurorina (Weymer, 1910) Luis Miguel Constantino 2016 Supplementary Material: Constantino, 2016. Revision of the tribe Haeterini (Lepidoptera: Satyirnae) Remarks on the nominal taxon Cithaerias cliftoni (Constantino, 1995) Cithaerias cliftoni Constantino, 1995 is a member of the tribe Haeterini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) confined to the Neotropical region. The butterflies of this tribe, are for the most part, readily distinguished from all other groups of the Satyrinae by having largely transparent wings with one or two ocelli and patches of color on the hindwing margin (Constantino 1992). C. cliftoni is a good species inhabiting the rainforests of the upper Amazon basin in the eastern slopes of the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador and North of Peru, not sympatric with C. aurora (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1862) (Penz et. al. 2014). C. cliftoni was synonymized by Lamas (2004) with C. phantoma (Fassl, 1922) from Manicoré at Rio Madeira, Tefé and São Paulo de Olivença, Amazonas, Brazil, a very distant population from Colombia, however Lamas (1998) was not able to locate the type material of C. phantoma. As a result of this Penz et. al (2014) synonymized C. phantoma with C. aurora and reinstated C. cliftoni as a full species based on morphological differences of the genitalia. Geographical distribution C. cliftoni is found in the east slope of the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador and North of Perú. In Colombia is found in the departments of Meta, Caquetá and Putumayo at an altitudinal range of 100 up to 800 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure & Materials of the Insect Wing
    Structure & Materials of the Insect Wing Article by Samantha Chalut Background To this day, Evolution the true origins of insect flight remains obscure, as the earliest he earliest insects had four winged insects show evidence of Twings, independently being fully adept at flight. functioning forewings and hindwings. The well-known insects, n insect’s wings are outgrowths damselflies and dragonflies, have Aof the exoskeleton that enable kept this design. Since then, insect it to fly; this includes two pairs of wing designs vary where either the wings known as the forewing and forewing or hindwing are hindwing (although a select few specialized for force production, insects lack hindwings). The while many other insects are current designs of an insect wings functionally 2 winged through have evolved over hundreds of attaching the smaller hindwings millions of years to produce many to the forewings. variations, each with it’s own design tradeoffs. These tradeoffs may include specializations in the flight performance aspects such as efficiency, versatility, maneuverability, or stability. Structure he structure and design of an insect Twing is essential, as it must endure functionally over the insect’s lifespan. They must be capable of enduring collisions or tearing without failure. To achieve this insect wings can deform readily, even reversibly, through its overall structure. In many cases aerodynamic efficiency is improved through the coupling of the forewing and hindwing. This is achieved in a few different ways. Most commonly, the wings are coupled through a row of small hooks on the forward margin of the hindwing, locking onto the forewing. Another form of coupling is seen where Grasshopper forewing vein celled intersections the jugal lobe of the forewing covers a portion of the hindwing, or even where they broadly overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Day Auction of Coins and Antiquities Including the Douglas Rose Collection Day 1 Thursday 04 October 2012 10:00
    Two Day Auction of Coins and Antiquities including The Douglas Rose Collection Day 1 Thursday 04 October 2012 10:00 Timeline Auctions Limited The Swedenborg Hall 20-21 Bloomsbury Way London WC1A 2TH Timeline Auctions Limited (Two Day Auction of Coins and Antiquities including The Douglas Rose Collection Day 1 ) Catalogue - Downloaded from UKAuctioneers.com Lot: 1 Lot: 5 Greek Macedonia - Philip II - Greek Macedonia - Alexander III - Zeus Tetradrachm Circa 323-315 Hercules Tetradrachm 316-311 BC, posthumous issue, BC, Susa mint. Obv: head of Amphipolis mint. Obv: laureate Hercules right, wearing lionskin. head of Zeus right. Rev: FILIP- Rev: ALEXANDROU legend to POU legend, youth on horseback right, BASILEWS below with right, holding long palm branch; Zeus seated left, holding eagle upright palm branch beneath and sceptre; wreath in left field, horse, dot and P beneath horse's PR monogram beneath throne. foreleg. LeRider 46.12; SNG Price 3853; see Sear 6724; see ANS 736; Sear 6680 ff; see Wildwinds.com (this coin). 17.05 Wildwinds.com (this coin) 14.18 grams. grams. Estimate: £250.00 - £350.00 Estimate: £600.00 - £700.00 Lot: 6 Lot: 2 Greek Macedonia - Alexander III - Greek Macedonia - Alexander III - Hercules Drachm 290-275 BC, Athena Gold Stater 330-320 BC. Chios mint. Obv: head of Abydos mint. Obv: head of Hercules right, wearing lionskin Athena right in a crested headdress. Rev: ALEXANDROU Corinthian helmet decorated with legend, Zeus seated left, holding a serpent. Rev: ALEXANDROU eagle and sceptre, PYR legend with Nike standing left, monogram above bunch of holding wreath and stylis, AR grapes in left field.
    [Show full text]