DOCSLIB.ORG

September 30, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Broad Coalition Calls on Congress to Secure Final House-Senate Agreement on Tax Extenders Before Leaving for Elections October 1, 2008 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable John Boehner Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives House Republican Leader 235 Cannon House Office Building 242 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515-0508 Washington, D.C. 20515-3508 The Honorable Harry Reid The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Democratic Leader Senate Republican Leader 528 Hart Senate Office Building 361-A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Congressional Leaders: For a brief period on Monday, it appeared the Congress would depart for the election recess without final action on the pending tax extender legislation. However, it now seems that both the House of Representatives and the Senate will return later this week. As a broad coalition of more than 680 businesses, environmental organizations, public health advocates, electric utilities, agricultural organizations, investors, labor groups, nongovernmental organizations, states, and trade associations, we are writing now to urge that these few extra days be used to secure a final House – Senate agreement on tax extenders. At risk with the possible failure of the extenders package are hundreds of thousands of jobs, billions of dollars in clean energy investment, crucial incentives for research and development, and a range of popular programs. We respectfully urge that Congress not leave for the election recess until a final agreement has been reached on the vitally important tax extender package. Sincerely, Aerospace Industries Association Alliance to Save Energy American Council of Engineering Companies American Electronics Association American Farm Bureau Federation American Institute of Architects American Insurance Association American Iron and Steel Institute American Solar Energy Society American Wind Energy Association Association For Manufacturing Technology Directors Guild of America Edison Electric Institute General Electric Google Independent Film and Television Alliance Information Technology Association of America International Council of Shopping Centers League of Conservation Voters Medical Device Manufacturers Association National Association of Counties National Association of Industrial and Office Properties National Association of Manufacturers National Association of State Energy Officials National Education Association National Electrical Manufacturers Association National Forest Counties and Schools Coalition Natural Resources Defense Council Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of Recording Musicians Association America Retail Industry Leaders Association Sierra Club Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Solar Energy Industries Association TechNet U.S. Chamber of Commerce Union of Concerned Scientists United States Telecom Association United Steelworkers The Wilderness Society 1st Light Energy Inc Marquiss Wind Power 25x’25 Alliance Massachusetts Biotechnology Council 3Tier MC Solar Engineering 4th Day Energy MDZ Consulting Abbott Laboratories Mead & Hunt, Inc. Abengoa Solar, Inc Megawatt Solar ABS Alaskan, Inc Memphis Biofuels Absolutely Solar Merck & Co., Inc. Adobe Systems, Inc. Mesa Power Group, LLC Advanced Biofuels Coalition Methanex Advanced Energy Methanol Institute Advanced Micro Devices Michael Day Enterprises Advantage For Analysts LLC Microsoft Corporation AEE Solar, Inc. Mid-America Biofuels AES Corporation MidAmerican Energy Company AES Wind Generation Midwest Wind Energy, LLC Agilent Technologies, Inc. Milagro Biofuels of Memphis AGP Millwood Metalworks Inc Akeena Solar Minnesota Power Alaska Applied Sciences, Inc. Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. Aldridge Electric MMA Renewable Ventures Allergan, Inc. Morgan Stanley Alliance for Clean Energy New York, Inc. Mortenson Construction Alliant Energy Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association Allied Renewable Energy Motorola Altera Mr. Electric of Sonora Alternative Liquid Fuel Industries Inc National Association of Industrial & Office Properties Alternative Systems, Inc. National Audubon Society Alterra Bioenergy Resources Corporation National Biodiesel Board AMECO Solar National Education Association Ameren Corporation National Forest Counties & Scjool Coalition American Council for an Energy Efficient National Grid Economy American Council of Life Insurers National Hydropower Association American Council on Renewable Energy National Renderers Association American Electric Power National Semiconductor Corporation American Express Company National Tooling & Machining Association American Federation of Radio and Television National Venture Capital Association Artists American Foundry Society New Energy Resources American Insurance Association New Leaf Biofuel American Iron and Steel Institute New Leaf Paper American Proteins, Inc. Nexgen Energy LLC. American Solar Electric NextTech American Soybean Association Noble Environmental Power American Transport Systems Nokia Inc. Amgen NorCal PV Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale Apex Solar, Inc. Nordic Windpower APG Solar Nortel Apple Inc. North Mississippi Biodiesel,Inc. Applied Materials Northland Associates, Inc. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Northstar Wind Towers, LLC. Arise Ventures, Inc. NorthWestern Energy Arizona BioIndustry Association Nova West Solar Arizona Public Service Novartis Arlington Energy, LLC Novo Nordisk, Inc. Asociados PanAmericanos NPES The Association for Suppliers of Printing, Publishing and Converting Technologies Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers NRG Systems Association of Talent Agents Nu-Energie, LLC AstraZeneca NVIDIA AT&T Services, Inc. Oak Creek Energy Athena Design Systems Ocean Energy Institute Athens Biodiesel, LLC O'Connell Electric Co. Atlantic City Electric OCR Solar Atmospheric Systems Corporation Oerlikon Solar Aubrey Silvey Enterprises, Inc. Offline Independent Energy Systems Ausra, Inc. OGE Energy Corp. Autodesk Inc. Ongrid AVANTI Wind Systems Inc. OptiSolar, Inc. Avaya Inc. Oracle Avista Corporation Oregon Solar Energy Industries Association (OSEIA) AWS Truewind LLC Oregon Trail Wind Farm Aztec Solar Organization for International Investment Babcock & Brown Otter Tail Corporation Baker Commodities, Inc Owens Corning Ballard Power Systems Pacific Biodiesel Inc. Bank of America Pacific Biodiesel Technologies LLC Baram America, LLC Pacific Biodiesel Texas LP Barnhart Crane & Rigging Company Pacific Power Management Bauer Compressors, Inc. Pacific Winds LLC Bauer Plastics Technology Group PacifiCorp Baxter Padoma Wind Power, LLC Baynote Recommendations Pahl & McCay BD Consulting Palm, Inc. Beachside Solar Technologies Paquin Energy & Fuel Bergey Windpower Co. Paseo Cargill Energy LLC Berrendo Wind Energy PAX Streamline, Inc. Biodiesel Coalition of Texas Pepco Holdings, Inc. Biodiesel Experts International LLC Permacity Solar Inc. Biodiesel Industries, Inc Petersen Dean Roofing BioDiesel One, Ltd Pfizer Inc BioEnergy Systems, LLC PG&E Corporation Biogen Idec Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Bio-NRG, LLC Plug Power Inc. BioResource Consultants, Inc Principle Power, Inc. BioSelect Fuels Plymouth Systems, Inc. Biotechnology Industry Organization Poco Solar Energy, Inc. Bloom Energy PolyFuel, Inc. Blue H USA LLC Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association Blue Sky Energy, Inc Portland General Electric Bluewater Wind PowerWorks LLC Boeing Company PPG Industries Borderland Wind LLC PPL Corporation BOSCH Precision Machined Products Association Boston Scientific Corporation Precision Metalforming Association Breakthrough Technologies Institute Premier Power Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Principal Financial Group Building Owners & Manufacturers Association Pro Systems International Business Council for Sustainable Energy Procter & Gamble Business Software Alliance Producers Guild of America Butler Sun Solutions Professional Land Surveyors C&G/Mercury Plastics Professional Logistics Group, Inc. C. R. Bard, Inc. Proven Energy, Ltd. CA, Inc. Prudential CAB Incorporated PSEG Cabazon Wind Energy, LLC Puget Sound Energy Cadence Design Systems Pure Energy Systems, Inc. CALEnergy PV Powered California Biodiesel Alliance Q-Cells California Center for Sustainable Energy QUALCOMM Incorporated California Healthcare Institute R & R Solar Supply California Solar Electric R&D Credit Coalition California Solar Energy Industries Association Rahus Institute (CALSEIA) Cardinal Fastener RAM Associates Careba Mott MacDonald, LLC Ran-Bro Tool Co. Carlson Small Power Consultants RBF Port Neches LLC Cascade Microtech, Inc. Real Estate Roundtable Caterpillar Inc. REC Solar Caucus for Producers, Writers & Directors Reco Biodiesel, LLC Center for Environmental Innovation Regrid Power, Inc. Central Iowa Energy RENEW Wisconsin Central Texas Biofuels, LLC Renewable Energy Group Central Vermont Public Service Corporation Renewable Energy Products, LLC CH Energy Group, Inc. Renewable Energy Systems Americas Inc. Chesapeake Custom Chemical RENEWergy LLC Chicago Industrial Fasteners REpower USA Cisco ResMed Inc. Citigroup Inc. Reunion Power LLC Civil Engineering Consultants Rheem Clean Fuel Connection (SolSource Energy) Riksch BioFuels LLC Clean Power Now River Valley Testing Corp Clean Power Solutions RMT-WindConnect CleanSource Power Roche Palo Alto LLC Click Bond, Inc. Rockwell Automation Clipper Windpower Inc. Rockwell Collins CMS Energy Royce Associates Cobalt Power Systems, Inc. RPL Holdings, Inc. Commonwealth Capital Advisors, LLC
Recommended publications
  • Rural Electrification in Bolivia Through Solar Powered Stirling Engines

    Rural Electrification in Bolivia Through Solar Powered Stirling Engines

    Rural electrification in Bolivia through solar powered Stirling engines Carlos Gaitan Bachelor of ScienceI Thesis KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Energy Technology EGI-2014 SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Bachelor of Science Thesis EGI-2014 Rural electrification in Bolivia through solar powered Stirling engines Carlos Gaitan Approved Examiner Supervisor Catharina Erlich Commissioner Contact person II Abstract This study focuses on the rural areas of Bolivia. The village investigated is assumed to have 70 households and one school. Electrical supply will be covered with the help of solar powered Stirling engines. A Stirling engine is an engine with an external heat source, which could be fuel or biomass for example. The model calculates the electrical demand for two different cases. One low level demand and one high level demand. By studying the total electrical demand of the village, the model can calculate a sizing for the Stirling system. However, for the sizing to be more accurate, more research needs to be done with regards to the demand of the village and the incoming parameters of the model. III Sammanfattning Den här studien fokuserar på landsbygden i Bolivia. En by som antas ha 70 hushåll och en skola är det som ligger till grund för studien. Byn ska försörjas med el med hjälp av soldrivna Stirling motorer. En Stirling motor är en motor som drivs med en extern värmekälla. Denna värmekälla kan vara exempelvis biomassa eller annan bränsle. Modellen som tas fram i projektet beräknar elektricitetsbehovet för byn för två nivåer, ett lågt elbehov och ett högt elbehov. Genom att studera det totala elbehovet över dagen kan modellen beräkna fram en storlek för Stirling systemet.
  • Bankrupt Companies

    Bankrupt Companies

    The List of Fallen Solar Companies: 2015 to 2009: S.No Year/Status Company Name and Details 118 2015 Enecsys (microinverters) bankrupt -- Enecsys raised more than $55 million in VC from investors including Wellington Partners, NES Partners, Good Energies and Climate Change Capital Private Equity for its microinverter technology. 117 2015 QBotix (trackers) closed -- QBotix had a two-axis solar tracker system where the motors, instead of being installed two per tracker, were moved around by a rail-mounted robot that adjusted each tracker every 40 minutes. But while QBotix was trying to gain traction, single-axis solar trackers were also evolving and driving down cost. QBotix raised more than $19.5 million from Firelake, NEA, DFJ JAIC, Siemens Ventures, E.ON and Iberdrola. 116 2015 Solar-Fabrik (c-Si) bankrupt -- German module builder 115 2015 Soitec (CPV) closed -- France's Soitec, one of the last companies with a hope of commercializing concentrating photovoltaic technology, abandoned its solar business. Soitec had approximately 75 megawatts' worth of CPV projects in the ground. 114 2015 TSMC (CIGS) closed -- TSMC Solar ceased manufacturing operations, as "TSMC believes that its solar business is no longer economically sustainable." Last year, TSMC Solar posted a champion module efficiency of 15.7 percent with its Stion- licensed technology. 113 2015 Abengoa -- Seeking bankruptcy protection 112 2014 Bankrupt, Areva's solar business (CSP) closed -- Suffering through a closed Fukushima-inspired slowdown in reactor sales, Ausra 111 2014 Bankrupt,
  • E3t-JCKETE-J JEFF HATCH-MILLER Chairman WILLLAM A

    E3t-JCKETE-J JEFF HATCH-MILLER Chairman WILLLAM A

    COMMISSIONERS Arizona Corporation Commission E3t-JCKETE-J JEFF HATCH-MILLER Chairman WILLLAM A. MUNDELL NOV 142006 MIKE GLEASON KRISTIN K. MAYES DWKEZT~DUY BARRY WONG [N THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED DOCKET NO. RE-OOOOOC-05-0030 RULEMAKING FOR THE RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD AND TARIFF RULES. DECISION NO. 69127 2 OPINION AND ORDER s >ATE OF PUBLIC COMMENT HEARING: May 23,2006 and June 5,2006 1C ’LACE OF HEARING: Phoenix, Arizona 11 LDMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Teena Wolfe 12 N ATTENDANCE: Chairman Jeff Hatch-Miller Commissioner William A. Mundell 13 Commissioner Mike Gleason Commissioner Kristin K. Mayes 14 LPPEARANCES: Ms. Janice Alward, Assistant Chief Counsel, 15 Legal Division, on behalf of the Commission’s Utilities Division Staff. 16 IY THE COMMISSION: 17 By this Decision, the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) adopts new 18 enewable Energy Standard and Tariff rules, Arizona Administrative Code (“A.A.C.”) R14-2-1801 19 rough -1815 (“Proposed RES Rules”), and orders the Commission’s Utilities Division Staff 20 Staff ’) to submit the adopted rules to the Office of the Arizona Attorney General for endorsement. 21 he text of the Proposed RES Rules is attached to and incorporated in this Decision as Appendix A. 22 he Proposed RES Rules require Affected Utilities to satisfy an Annual Renewable Energy 23 equirement by obtaining Renewable Energy Credits from Eligible Renewable Energy Resources as 24 :fined in the Proposed RES Rules. The Proposed RES Rules require each Affected Utility to file a 25 riff withthe Commission that proposes methods for recovering the reasonable and prudent costs of 3f; Implying with the Proposed RES Rules, for Commission approval.
  • Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest

    Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest

    Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council Jordan Macknick and Angelica Tovar-Hastings National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Komor University of Colorado-Boulder Margot Gerritsen and Shweta Mehta Stanford University The Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Colorado School of Mines, the Colorado State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A50-61376 March 2015 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council Jordan Macknick and Angelica Tovar-Hastings National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Komor University of Colorado-Boulder Margot Gerritsen and Shweta Mehta Stanford University Prepared under Task No. 6A50.1010 The Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Colorado School of Mines, the Colorado State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. JISEA® and all JISEA-based marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. The Joint Institute for Technical Report Strategic Energy Analysis NREL/TP-6A50-61376 15013 Denver West Parkway March 2015 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.jisea.org Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.
  • Solar Energy Markets Solar Energy Markets an Analysis of the Global Solar Industry

    Solar Energy Markets Solar Energy Markets an Analysis of the Global Solar Industry

    Solar Energy Markets Solar Energy Markets An Analysis of the Global Solar Industry Philip G. Jordan The Economic Advancement Research Institute Wrentham, MA, USA and BW Research Partnership, Inc. Wrentham, MA, USA AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangement with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notice Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
  • Thirty-Five Years of Renewable Energy Project Experience at Fort Huachuca, AZ

    Thirty-Five Years of Renewable Energy Project Experience at Fort Huachuca, AZ

    Spring 2016, Vol. 35, No. 4 49 Thirty-five Years of Renewable Energy Project Experience at Fort Huachuca, AZ William J. Stein, CEM, CEP, CSDP, CMVP, CEA, REP, CDSM Bruce R. Johnson ABSTRACT Fort Huachuca, Arizona, located 60 miles (96 km) southeast of Tucson, has had 35 years of experience with various renewable energy systems. This article discusses lessons learned from the successes and failures over the past 35 years, including: an indoor pool solar water heating system installed in 1980; a solar domestic hot water system installed in 1981; a grid connected photovoltaic (PV) system installed in 1982; transpired air solar collectors (Solarwalls™) installed in 2001; daylighting installed in 2001; a 10-kW wind turbine installed in 2002; a 1 MW wind turbine installed in September 2011; PV powered outdoor lighting installed in 1994; a prototype Dish/Stirling solar thermal electric generator installed in 1996; two 30-kW building integrated photovoltaic systems installed on new membrane roofs in January 2009; a 42.84 kW photovoltaic system that was moved from the Pen- tagon in June 2009 and was operational in early November 2009 on a truck shed roof at Fort Huachuca; and a utility owned 13.6 MW (AC) photovoltaic system installed in 2014. Also discussed is an experimen- tal solar attic system that collects the hot air in an attic and uses a heat exchanger and tank to produce solar domestic hot water. This article discusses the design, installation, metering, operations, and mainte- nance of these systems, and also work in progress on the installation of commercial, off-the-shelf 3-kW Dish/Stirling solar thermal electric generators and solar thermal/natural gas-to-electric systems at a cen- tral plant.
  • Comentarios – PBJL Energy Corporation

    Comentarios – PBJL Energy Corporation

    ó PBJL ENERGY CORPORATION 504 Fernado Calder St, Urbanización Ingenieros, San Juan, PR 00918 February 16, 2021 Mr. Edison Avilés-Deliz Chairman Public Service Regulatory Board Puerto Rico Energy Bureau 268 Muñoz Rivera Ave. San Juan, PR 00918 Filed under PREB Case Number: NEPR-MI-2020-0012 Re: Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (“PREPA”) filing with the Public Service Regulatory Board of the Puerto Rico Energy Bureau under Case Number NEPR-MI-2020-0012 on February 9, 2021. Subject: Motion in Compliance with Order Submitting List of Projects PREPA will Potentially Chose to Acquire 150 MW of Renewable Energy Dear Mr. Avilés-Deliz: The 165 MW AC / 395 MW DC Montalva Solar Farm Project (hereinafter “Montalva” or “Project”) with its initial phase of 80 MW AC / 162 MW DC, sponsored by PBJL Energy Corporation (“PBJL”), a Puerto Rican corporation, together with Greenbriar Capital Corp (“Greenbriar”); hereby files a response to the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (“PREPA”) filing with the Public Service Regulatory Board of the Puerto Rico Energy Bureau (“PREB”) dated February 9, 2021, under Case Number NEPR-MI-2020-0012 titled “Motion in Compliance with Order Submitting List of Projects PREPA will Potentially Chose to Acquire 150 MW of Renewable Energy.” PBJL and Greenbriar Capital Corp acknowledge the PREPA filing with PREB and herein highlight its project’s attributes for the consideration of the criteria for the selection and for approval of its proposed PPOA Power Purchase and Operation Agreement (”PPOA”) from among the 16 shovel-ready projects under consideration for approval by the FOMB. It should be technically and financially clear to PREPA and all stakeholders that Montalva is the lowest cost project to ratepayers and Montalva is a premier project for Puerto Rico.
  • L'énergie Solaire Aux Etats-Unis 1/60 Ambassade De France À

    L'énergie Solaire Aux Etats-Unis 1/60 Ambassade De France À

    Ambassade de France à Washington Mission pour la Science et la Technologie 4101 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington DC 20007 Tél. : +1 202 944 6249 Fax : +1 202 944 6219 Mail : [email protected] URL : http://www.ambafrance-us.org Domaine Energie Document Rapport de mission Titre L’énergie solaire aux Etats-Unis Auteur(s) Daniel Ochoa (attaché scientifique à San Francisco) Abdelilah Slaoui (InEss, CNRS) Robert Soler (EDF) Veronica Bermudez (IRDEP, EDF) Date 16 janvier 2009 Contact MST Daniel Ochoa ; [email protected] Numéro SMM09_ Mots-clefs Energie solaire, énergies renouvelables, photovoltaïque, concentrateurs Résumé Une bonne utilisation de l’énergie solaire permettrait de répondre à une grande partie des défis mondiaux liés à l’approvisionnement énergétique et au changement climatique. Grâce aux politiques volontaristes de plusieurs pays, aux progrès technologiques, et à l’investissement privé, l’industrie du solaire connaît actuellement une croissance sans précédent. La mission scientifique de l'Ambassade a jugé que les enjeux scientifiques, économiques, et sociétaux du solaire justifiaient l’organisation d’une mission exploratoire aux Etats-Unis. Cette mission a permis à 5 experts français de rencontrer quelques uns des principaux acteurs américains en recherche et développement, en abordant la plupart des technologies les plus prometteuses. Il apparaît que les Etats-Unis, actuellement distancés par l’Allemagne et le Japon sur le sujet, entendent rattraper leur retard rapidement, et disposent pour cela d’atouts notoires : un ensoleillement record au Nevada, avec de vastes étendues désertiques inutilisées, un tissu industriel innovant extrêmement dense en Californie, et plus particulièrement dans la Silicon Valley, avec un gouvernement local très sensible aux questions environnementales.
  • Research Report the Preconditions for Expanded Solar Power in California

    Research Report the Preconditions for Expanded Solar Power in California

    Research Report The Preconditions for Expanded Solar Power in California Tynan McAuley Summer 2009 During the summer of 2009, I worked with Professor Gary Evans on assessing the cost feasibility of large-scale solar electricity generation in California. Initially, our goal was “to use sensitivity analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of off-site (remote-installation) solar electricity generation, considering different technologies and grid structures for the power market in the state of California.” We wanted to determine which variables would most affect the cost effectiveness of solar power projects, and how that might impact the pace of implementation and the likelihood of realizing California program goals. We worked on this project from the end of May to the end of July, and at the end of July, revaluated the focus of the research. Although the evaluation of cost-effectiveness remains the goal of the project, political and economic developments through 2009 are stagnating the expansion of solar energy. The central problems are the slow pace and complexity of the surveys undertaken by the Renewable Energy Transmission Coordinating Committee, which define the specifics of the roll-out for renewable power in California, and the unusually low cost of natural gas in 2009, which is inhibiting the ability and willingness of power purchasers to agree to the long-term power purchase agreements that are required for the financing of new renewable power generating facilities. Professor Evans concluded that the current deadlines (2012 and 2020) for renewable energy adoption in California will not be met. For the last two weeks of the project, we explored some of the roadblocks to solar power adoption in California.
  • DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Overview Contents Photovoltaic Technologies Solar Thermal Technologies Measurements and Characterization

    DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Overview Contents Photovoltaic Technologies Solar Thermal Technologies Measurements and Characterization

    The Solar Energy Technologies Program PowerLight Corp./PIX14597 Energy moves the modern world. Available, reliable, affordable energy. Since the Industrial Revolution, fossil fuels—coal, oil, and natural gas—have powered immense technological progress. But supplies of fossil fuels are limited, and continued reliance on them may have significant environmental consequences. Fortunately, there are alternatives. The most powerful one is right over our heads. We are bathed in the clean, virtually inexhaustible energy of the sun. Each hour, enough sunlight reaches Earth to meet the world’s energy needs for a year. To harvest this bounty, we need technology that efficiently converts the sun’s energy into forms we can use. Developing this technology is the purpose of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technologies Program. The United States has abundant solar resources. The sunlight falling on less than Powerful Goals, Powerful Technologies 0.5% of the mainland could satisfy all the nation’s electricity needs. The Solar Energy Technologies Program is part of the DOE Photovoltaic Technologies Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The Program’s mission is to improve U.S. security, environmental The majority of the Program’s budget is allocated to PV research and quality, and economic prosperity through public-private development (R&D). All PV devices convert sunlight directly into partnerships that bring reliable and affordable solar energy electricity. However, there is a variety of materials and processes for technologies to the marketplace. It supports research and creating PV devices, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. The development on a wide range of photovoltaic (PV) and solar major trade-off is between cost and sunlight-to-electricity conversion thermal technologies that convert sunlight into useful energy.
  • Sunshot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    Sunshot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    SunShot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The U.S. Department of Energy would like to acknowledge the project coordination and in-depth analysis conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the contributions by the Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Electric Power Association, and the many organizations that participated in the development of this report. The preparation and production of this report was coordinated by New West Technologies, LLC, Energetics Incorporated, and NREL. All contributors to the report are listed in Appendix D. Cover photo renderings by Joshua Bauer, NREL MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The SunShot Initiative was launched in February 2011 with the goal of making solar energy cost- competitive with conventional electricity generating technologies within the decade. Achieving this goal will require dramatic decreases in the cost structure of solar technologies—on the order of a 75% reduction—across all markets including residential, commercial, and utility-scale deployments of solar. To do this most effectively, the SunShot Initiative spans the full spectrum from basic science to applied research and development. It also spans across multiple U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) offices, including Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy (ARPA-E) and the Office of Science (SC). The SunShot Vision Study explores the implications of achieving the SunShot Initiative’s targets both in terms of potential benefits as well as potential challenges. The potential benefits include solar contributing an increasingly significant share of electricity generation over the next 20 to 40 years, creating thousands of new jobs, and saving consumers money by placing downward pressure on electricity prices.
  • On the Path to Sunshot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability

    On the Path to Sunshot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability

    ON THE PATH TO SUNSHOT Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability May 2016 NREL/TP-5500-65688 SAND2016-2237 R On the Path to SunShot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability Mark Mehos1, Craig Turchi1, Jennie Jorgenson1, Paul Denholm1, Clifford Ho2, and Kenneth Armijo2 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Sandia National Laboratories NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SUGGESTED CITATION Mehos, Mark, Craig Turchi, Jennie Jorgenson, Paul Denholm, Clifford Ho, and Kenneth Armijo. 2016. On the Path to SunShot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5500-65688. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65688.pdf. Cover photos (clockwise from top left): Solar Design Associates, Inc., NREL 08563; SolarReserve; Dennis Schroeder, NREL 30551; and iStock 000075760625 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.