Middle Shuswap River Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middle Shuswap River Watershed Chapter 12 MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Figure 12-1 . Shuswap River above dam site (Couteau Power Company 1912) 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 Facilities The initial plans for a power project at Shuswap Falls had been developed prior to 1912 by the Couteau Power Company based in Vancouver, B.C. The Shuswap Falls generating station, Wilsey Dam and Peers Dam were constructed and owned by West Canadian Hydroelectric Corporation and went into service in 1929. The project consists of impounded storage in Sugar Lake controlled by Peers (Sugar Lake) Dam, and power generation from Wilsey Dam at Shuswap Falls 31 km downstream. The Shuswap Falls project was acquired by the B.C. Power Commission (a predecessor of B.C. Hydro) in 1945. Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-1 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Figure 12-2. Location of Shuswap Falls hydro project Figure 12-3. Wilsey Dam (Water Powers B.C. 1954) Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-2 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Figure 12-4. Brenda Falls in 1920s (BC Archives) Figure 12-5. Sugar Lake Dam (BC Hydro) Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-3 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Specifications about the structures and reservoirs: DAM Peers Wilsey Nameplate capacity (MW) 0 5.2 Dependable capacity (MW) 0 5 Dam function storage diversion Date constructed Date operational 1929 1929 Date reconstructed Height (m) 13 30 Length (m) 98 40 Dam footprint area (m2) Fishway at dam no no Historic anadromous fish presence unconfirmed yes RESERVOIR Sugar Lake headpond Cleared/ not cleared nc n/a Present area (ha) 2217 7 Orig. lake area (ha) 1564 0 Watershed area (km2) Present elevation a.s.l. (m) 601.6 444.5 Normal drawdown range (m) 7.8 max 3 Mean depth (m) 35 Maximum depth (m) 83 30 Storage (million m3) 148 0 Mean water retention time 6 mo. <1 day Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 37 50 DIVERSION - - to powerplant Structure type - - penstocks (140m) Licensed flow (m3/sec) - - 31 Fish flow release (m3/sec) 5 8.5 Mainstem length diminished (km) 0.14 Mainstem length augmented (km) 1.2 Hydrology 1.2.1 Basin and Runoff The Middle Shuswap basin is located in the western ranges of the Monashee Mountains. Sugar Lake is normally fully drafted by March. The Shuswap River begins to rise in April after the winter months of decreased flow, and usually peaks in late May or early June. The runoff regime is dominated by melting of the large winter snowpack. A small amount of glaciation within the watershed does not contribute significantly to the flow regime. Rainfall is a minor contributor to the volume of the annual flow, but can produce large peak flows that lead to spilling (BCH 1994). Reservoir operation tends to delay the onset of spring freshet flows and elevates winter (December-February) flows (Lister 1990). Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-4 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED 1.2.2 Operation and Licensed Diversion Flow Various instream flow requirements are described by Lewis et al. (1996). For protection of the fish resource downstream of Wilsey Dam, a minimum of 300 (8.5 m3/s) must be released at all times, but a local operating order apparently supercedes this and currently allows a minimum release of 15 m3/s. 1.2.3 Habitat Types Flooded by Reservoir Reservoir impoundment raised the elevation of the original Sugar Lake by about 7 m. The reservoir area is 2,217 ha after flooding 653 hectares of land (Figure 12-6). The reservoir shoreline length is now 41 km. The bathymetry of Sugar Lake is shown in Figures 12-7 and 12-8. The headpond behind Wilsey Dam has backwatered about 3.7 km of the incised river channel for an area about 7 ha (Lewis et al. 1996). The GIS calculations done by this study estimated the following losses of fish habitat from the pre-impoundment condition: Sugar Lake Original habitat lost Lake flooded (ha) 1564 Land flooded (ha) 653 Lake shoreline (km) 23 Mainstem: length (km) 7 channel (ha) 65 riparian * (ha) Tributary: length (km) 4 riparian ** (ha) Wetland: (ha) 2 * mainstem riparian zone calculated at 30 m from each bank ** tributary riparian zone calculated at 15 m from each bank Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-5 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-6 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-7 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-8 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED 2. FISH 2.1 Historical and Current Species Presence A list of current fish species within major reaches is presented in Table 12-1. The catastrophic rock slides that blocked Hell’s Gate in the Fraser River Canyon in 1913 and 1914 had a major effect on anadromous runs to the Middle Shuswap River. After much of the initial rock material was removed by March 1915, work was discontinued due to conflicting opinions within the agencies about their passability to fish until another small slide occurred in 1941. Finally, the International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission constructed permanent fishways on both banks around Hells Gate between 1944 and 1947 (Roos 1991). During these 32 years, flow conditions at Hells Gate periodically affected the abundance of salmon runs returning to the Shuswap watershed. This legacy may have led to an under-appreciation of salmon stocks using this system during the planning of hydroelectric development. 2.1.1 Downstream of Wilsey Dam The early name for the Middle Shuswap River upstream of Mara Lake was originally the Spallumcheen River (Babcock 1903). Anadromous stocks of chinook, sockeye, pink and coho salmon had access to the entire river below Shuswap Falls but there was at least one point of difficult passage in the river below Mabel Lake. Mabel Lake was classified as non- productive for sockeye on a map of spawning grounds by the International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission (IPSFC 1945). 2.1.2 Upstream of Wilsey Dam The original Shuswap Falls were a partial barrier to anadromous fish access; e.g., fishing for chinook salmon near Cherryville was noted in the 1920’s (French 1995), and there was an anecdotal report of sockeye in Sugar Lake (Babcock 1903). The original lower falls (Shuswap) were described as a succession of short drops totalling 12.2 m over a distance of 61 m in a narrow rocky canyon. The original development by the Couteau Power Company in 1913 petitioned to the Chief Inspector of Fisheries against installing a fish ladder at Shuswap Falls costing $20,000 to $25,000 (Mackenzie 1913). Reasons given included the lack of a commercial river fishery, the inaccessibility of the river to sportsmen, the “sheer falls of 38 feet”1 at the outlet of Sugar Lake, the proposed dam height of 70 feet, and the added financial burden to the project. An engineering plan of the proposed Wilsey Dam circa 1920 showed a fish ladder which was never built due to the proposed dam height of 21 m. Since its construction in 1929, Wilsey Dam has blocked upstream access to all anadromous stocks for 71 years. 1 Shotton (1913), a fisheries officer, interviewed the surveyor for the project who told him that the upper [Brenda] falls had a sheer drop of 10 feet at most, and that the rapids section had a total fall of 38 feet in 1100. Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-9 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED Bridge-Coastal Fish & Wildlife Restoration Program 12-10 Volume 2 Revised Jan 06/03: MIDDLE SHUSWAP RIVER WATERSHED In 1977, DFO released 75 adult chinook salmon above Wilsey Dam as a trial. Chinook releases in 1993 and 1995 both resulted in fry that reared in the river above the dam (Triton 1994d; 1995c). The Ministry of Environment has expressed some concerns about effects of salmon transplants on resident salmonids (Jantz 1995). 2.1.3 Upstream of Peers Dam The original Brenda Falls were described as not over 3 m in any one place, and that the series of rapids had a fall of 11.6 m in 335 m (Shotton 1913). 2.2 Impacts on Fish Facility Description of hydroelectric impacts Source g Ne Pos Sugar Lake 2. Reservoir footprint flooded 7 km of mainstem channel x and associated riparian zone, including loss of Sugar Reservoir Lake outlet spawning habitat. 3. Reservoir footprint flooded 4 km of tributary channel x and associated riparian zone: loss of habitats in lower reaches. 4. Original 1564 ha lake was flooded by 7 m to create x x present 2217 ha reservoir: gain of 653 ha in reservoir habitat and uncalculated volume. 5. Fluctuating water levels of 7 m reduced productivity x BC Hydro from shallow littoral habitats: see bathymetric map for 1994 shoal features 6. Fluctuating water levels isolated the shoreline riparian x x zone from the aquatic environment: original lake shoreline was increased from 23 km to 39 km of reservoir shoreline. 2 Peers Dam 7. Dam footprint of __ m : loss of instream, riparian and x upland habitats. 8. Debris booms at Peers Dam has reduced LWD x recruitment to river downstream. 9. Peers Dam has stopped gravel recruitment from Outlet x Cr. to river downstream. 10. Rapid flow changes below Peers Dam have affected x BC Hydro benthic insect production.
Recommended publications
  • Lower Shuswap River
    LOWER SHUSWAP RIVER Inventory, Mapping, and Aquatic Habitat Index Prepared For: Regional District North Okanagan, City of Enderby, and Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada July 2011 LOWER SHUSWAP RIVER Inventory, Mapping, and Aquatic Habitat Index A Living Document – Version 1.1 Prepared For: REGIONAL DISTRICT NORTH OKANAGAN CITY OF ENDERBY DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA Prepared By: ECOSCAPE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. # 102 - 450 Neave Court Kelowna, BC V1V 2M2 July 2011 Ecoscape File No. 10-642 102 – 450 Neave Ct. Kelowna BC V1V 2M2 Tel: 250.491.7337 Fax: 250.491.7772 [email protected] 10-642 i July 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been realized without the assistance and contribution from the following individuals and organizations: • Bob Harding, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada – for coordinating this initiative and providing technical support during field inventory. • Darryl Hussey, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada – for providing technical support during field inventory. • Lisa Tedesco, Ministry of Environment – for providing technical support during field inventory. • Bruce Runciman, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada – for providing technical support and review through development of the Index Matrices, relative habitat values, and Index Logic. • Sheldon Romain, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada – for safe boat navigation of the Lower Shuswap River and for technical support during field inventories. • Salmon spawning information was contributed by Nicole
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Annualreport1972.Pdf
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND CONSERVATION HON. ROBERT A. WILLIAMS, Minister LLOYD BROOKS, Deputy Minister REPORT OF THE Department of Recreation and Conservation containing the reports of the GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH, PROVINCIAL PARKS BRANCH, BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCIAL MUSEUM, AND COMMERCIAL FISHERIES BRANCH Year Ended December 31 1972 Printed by K. M. MACDONALD, Printer to tbe Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in right of the Province of British Columbia. 1973 \ VICTORIA, B.C., February, 1973 To Colonel the Honourable JOHN R. NICHOLSON, P.C., O.B.E., Q.C., LLD., Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: Herewith I beg respectfully to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1972. ROBERT A. WILLIAMS Minister of Recreation and Conservation 1_) VICTORIA, B.C., February, 1973 The Honourable Robert A. Williams, Minister of Recreation and Conservation. SIR: I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1972. LLOYD BROOKS Deputy Minister of Recreation and Conservation CONTENTS PAGE Introduction by the Deputy Minister of Recreation and Conservation_____________ 7 General Administration_________________________________________________ __ ___________ _____ 9 Fish and Wildlife Branch____________ ___________________ ________________________ _____________________ 13 Provincial Parks Branch________ ______________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC
    Final Report November 7th 2010 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC Prepared for the: Fraser Basin Council Kamloops, BC Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC Prepared for the: Fraser Basin Council Kamloops, BC Prepared by: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. 30 Gostick Place North Vancouver, BC V7M 3G3 Final Report November 7th 2010 Project 35138 DISCLAIMER This document has been prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. in accordance with generally accepted engineering and geoscience practices and is intended for the exclusive use and benefit of the client for whom it was prepared and for the particular purpose for which it was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. and its officers, directors, employees, and agents assume no responsibility for the reliance upon this document or any of its contents by any party other than the client for whom the document was prepared. The contents of this document are not to be relied upon or used, in whole or in part, by or for the benefit of others without specific written authorization from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. and our client. Report prepared by: Ken I. Ashley, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Ken J. Hall, Ph.D. Associate Report reviewed by: Barry Chilibeck, P.Eng. Principal Engineer NHC. 2010. Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC. Prepared for the Fraser Basin Council. November 7thth, 2010. © copyright 2010 Shuswap Lake Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan i CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge to Mike Crowe (DFO, Kamloops), Ian McGregor (Ministry of Environment, Kamloops), Phil Hallinan (Fraser Basin Council, Kamloops) and Ray Nadeau (Shuswap Water Action Team Society) for supporting the development of the Shuswap Lakes water quality monitoring plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset Canada, British Columbia and Beyond "See America First" Series
    SUNSET-CANADA •BRITISH COLUMBIA and BEYOND • cm our i. '^ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ^ SUNSET CANADA, BRITISH COLUMBIA AND BEYOND "SEE AMERICA FIRST" SERIES Each in one volume, decoraiice cover, firofaiely llluitrated CALIFORNIA, ROMANTIC AND BEAUTIFUL By George Wharton James $3.50; carriage paid, $3.85 OLD PANAMA AND CASTILLO DEL ORG By C. L. G. Anderson $3.50; carriage paid, $3.85 THREE WONDERLANDS OF THE AMERICAN WEST By Thomas D. Murphy $3.50; carriage paid, $3.80 ON SUNSET HIGHWAYS (California) By Thomas D. Murphy $3.00; carriage paid, $3.20 TEXAS, THE MARVELLOUS Winter By Nevin O. .^ * „ $3.50 ; carriage paid, $3.85 HOUSEBOATING ON A COLONIAL WATER- WAY (The Jamea River, Virginia) By Frank and Cortelle Hutchins $2.50; carriage paid, $2.70 PANAMA AND THE CANAL TO-DAY By Forbes Lindsay -j «,,„ $3.00; carnage paid, $3.20 ARIZONA, THE WONDERFUL By George Wharton James $3.50; carriage paid, $3-85 COLORADO: THE QUEEN JEWEL OF THE ROCKIES . „ By Mae Lacy Bacgs . ^ $3.50; carnage paid, W-oS OREGON. THE PICTURESQUE By Thomas D. Murphy ^^^^_ ^^^^.^^^ ^^.^^ ^^g^ ENCHANTMENT FLORIDA, THE LAND OF ., DYBy Neviniitvin O. Winter . * oc ^^^^. carnage paid, Sf3-oS Beyond) SUNSET CANADA (British Columbia and Archie Bell By ^^^^. ^^^^.^^^ ^^.^^ $3.85 THE PAGE COMPANY Boston, Mass. 53 Beacon Street, Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924076067903 Twin Falls in Yoho Valley. (See page 279.) BRITISH SUNSET COLUMBIA AND CANADA BEYOND An Account of its Settlement; Its Progress from the Early Days to the Present, including a Review of the Hudson's Bay Company; Its Amazing Variety of Climate; Its Charm of Landscape; Its Unique Cities and Attractive Towns and Their Industries; A Sur- vey of the Different Peoples to be Found There, including the Japanese and Doukhobors ; An Analysis of What it Offers in Opportunity to the Home Seeker, the Agriculturist, the Business Man, the Sportsman and the Traveller.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricajl'i"URE CANADA 6660 NW MARINE DRIVE VANCOUVER, B .C
    L. J, ra. VANVLir-_T, p.r,g. KDQ!OGIST AGRIcAJL'I"URE CANADA 6660 NW MARINE DRIVE VANCOUVER, B .C. VF;T 1X2 SOIL SURVEY of the NORTH OKANAGAN VALLEY By P . N . SPROUT and C . C . KELLEY INTERIM REPORT BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE KELOWNA, B . C . September, 1960 CONTENTS Page Acknowledgement . 3 Introduction . ., . 3 Description of the Area : Location and Extent _. 3 ..., Physiography . Transportation and Communications . Climate . .~. .e . .n . Origin of Soil Forming Dep osits . .e . Soil Classification . DESCRIPTION OF SOILS : 1 . Dark Brown Soils . 14 Hulcar Silt Loam . 14 2 : Black Soils . : . 15 Armstrong Series . 15 Moffat Series . 16 Grandview Series . 17 Na.hun Series . 18 Kalamalka Series . 19 Bluespr.i.ng Series . 20 3 . Ha ].omorphic Soils . 21 Spallumcheen Series . 21 Broadview Series . : . 22 4 . Brown Wooded Soils . 23 Grizzly Hill Series . 23 O'Keef e Series . e . 24 Lumby Series . .e . 25 Coldstream Series . Glenemma Series . 5 . Gray Wooded Soi.ls . Reiswig Series . Saltwell Loam . : . Plaster Series . 31 Enderby Series . 32 Hilton Series . 32 Beaverjack Series . 34 -2- Latewhos Fine Sandy Loam . 35 Stepney Sandy Loam . 36 Mara Series . 36 Cherryville Series . .. ., . 37 6 . Brown Podzolic Soils . ./o . 38 Sicamous Series . 39 Shuswap Series . 40 Sauff Series . 41 Schunter Series . 42 7 . Podzol Soils . .. 43 Hupel Series . 43 Reiter Series . 44 Vance Sand . 45 Sitkum Gravelly Loamy Sand . 46 8 . Meadow Soils . 47 Swanson Series . 47 9 . Dark Gray Gleysolic Soils . 47 Nisconlith Series . 48 Bessette Series . 49 10 . Gleysol Soils . 50 Duteau Series and Complex . m . 50 Gardom Series and Complex . 51 11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Shuswap River Watershed Sustainability Plan
    Shuswap River Watershed Sustainability Plan April, 2014 Prepared by the Regional District of the North Okanagan 2 Executive Summary The Shuswap River Watershed is highly regarded by community members that live within or access the Watershed for resources and recreation. Members of the community strongly believe that the Watershed should be protected and managed in a respectful, sustainable manner. The Shuswap River Watershed Sustainability Plan highlights the values, concerns and areas of interest of community members. The plan contains a set of five goals, nineteen objectives and one hundred and fourteen strategies that fall into the categories of Land Use and the Natural Environment; Recreation; Interagency Relations, Roles and Responsibilities; and Education & Awareness. These objectives and strategies have been developed to support the sustainable management of the Shuswap River Watershed and achieve the desired future vision for the area: Vision Statement: Working inclusively to sustain a healthy, resilient watershed where ecosystems are protected and restored and environmental and cultural values are respected ensuring that fish, wildlife, habitat and people thrive, today and into the future. The importance of the Shuswap River to the region is significant. Ecologically, economically, socially and culturally it is a valued resource. It supports timber and agricultural resources, hydropower generation, traditional food and medicinal resources and a wide range of recreational opportunities. It is home to a diverse range of ecosystems and several provincially and federally listed threatened and endangered species. The Shuswap River Watershed has high biodiversity especially in areas where riparian ecosystems are still extensive and occur in close proximity to diverse upland habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Fraser River Fishery Summary to Accompany IFMP Presentation for FORUM - DRAFT
    2018 Fraser River Fishery Summary to Accompany IFMP Presentation for FORUM - DRAFT Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chinook Fisheries .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Coho Fishery.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Chum ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Sockeye ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Pink ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 AREA 29: STRAIT OF GEORGIA ...................................................................................................................... 9 AREA 29: FRASER FLATS AND TIDAL FRASER RIVER .................................................................................... 10 REGION 3: THOMPSON-NICOLA – ZONE ONE ............................................................................................. 11 REGION 3: THOMPSON-NICOLA – ZONE TWO ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No
    5t-t DFO - Library / MPO - abliotheque P-5-1 fie . 1 1 SO II U11 11 11 11 111 12021816 \ Reconstruction of British Columbia Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) Stocks: 1970-1982 P. J. Starr, A. T. Charles, and M. A. Henderson Department of Fisheries and Oceans Fisheries Research Branch 1090 West Pender Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2P1 L Y August 1984 JAN 8 icIE- \Canadian Manuscript Report of `Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1780 A Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Âquatic Sciences; These reports contain scientific and technical information that represents an important contribution to existing knowledge but which for some reason may not be appropriate for primary scientific (i.e. Journa!) publication. They differ from Tech- nical Reports in terms of subject scope and potential audience: Manuscript Reports deal primarily with national or regional problems and distribution is generally restrict- ed to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries management, technology and development, ocean sciences, and aquatic environments relevant to Canada. Manuscript Reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report will be abstracted by Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and will be indexed annually in the Department's index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shuswap Watershed
    The Shuswap Watershed The Shuswap watershed is part of the traditional territory of the Secwepemc people who have resided here for over eight thousand Province of years. A provincial treasure, the Shuswap forms the major southeast contributor to the Fraser River watershed and provides key habitat British Columbia for a significant percentage of provincial fish stocks. Home to diverse wildlife and plant species, the watershed also provides water for drinking, development and agriculture. A popular location to live, visit, recreate and earn a living, the watershed deserves the best environmentally sustainable management and greater public awareness of its many values. Shuswap Watershed Facts The drainage area of the watershed is 1,552,058 hectares or 5,993 square miles The Shuswap watershed is located near the headwaters of the Fraser River system The highest point completely within the watershed is Mt. English at 2,701 metres above sea level The lowest point in the watershed is the exit of Little Shuswap Lake at Chase at only 346 metres above sea level Shuswap Lake produces 19% of the Sockeye population of the entire Fraser River system Of the Shuswap fish population, 70% require shoreline habitat for their survival Shuswap Lake is the 7th largest lake in B.C. Key Threats Invasive species – Non-native plant and animal species can have detrimental impacts on the ecosystem. They can compete with native species for food, shelter and habitat which may change ecosystems dynamics and can lead to the extinction of both fish and wildlife species. Some examples of non-native species include perch, bass, sunfish, and European starling.
    [Show full text]
  • ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ELECTORAL AREA "F" MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 Enderby Fire Hall 1500 Evergreen Street, Enderby, BC 7:00 P.M
    REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ELECTORAL AREA "F" MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 Enderby Fire Hall 1500 Evergreen Street, Enderby, BC 7:00 p.m. REGULAR AGENDA A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Advisory Planning Commission Electoral Area “F” – November 19, 2018 RECOMMENDATION 1 That the Agenda of the November 19, 2018 Advisory Planning Commission Electoral Area “F" meeting be approved as presented. C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 1. Advisory Planning Commission Electoral Area “F” – October 15, 2018 RECOMMENDATION 2 Page 3 - 5 That the minutes of the October 15, 2018 Advisory Planning Commission Electoral Area “F” meeting be adopted as circulated. D. DELEGATIONS E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Page 1 of 41 Advisory Planning Commission "F" Meeting Agenda November 19, 2018 F. NEW BUSINESS 1. Liquor Licence Referral Application Mabel Lake Golf & Country Club c/o HAY, A. [File No. 18-0714-F-LIQ] 3445 Enderby Mabel Lake Road, Electoral Area "F" • Letter to Advisory Planning Commission dated November 7, 2018 • Application Package • Staff report dated October 11, 2018 FOR DISCUSSION Page 6 - 21 2. Floodplain Exemption Request Rivers End Estates Ltd. c/o PAYNE, B. [File No. 18-0781-F-DP] 8192 Highway 97A, Electoral Area "F" • Letter to Advisory Planning Commission dated November 13, 2018 • Application Package • Staff report dated November 6, 2018 FOR DISCUSSION Page 22 - 41 G. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS H. REPORTS I. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 41 Advisory Planning Commission – Electoral Area “F” REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN MINUTES of a REGULAR meeting of the ELECTORAL AREA “F” ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION of the REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN held at the Enderby Fire Hall on October 15, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Sockeye Salmon Sakinaw Population Oncorhynchus Nerka
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka Sakinaw population in Canada ENDANGERED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka, Sakinaw population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 39 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2003. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka Sakinaw population in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 35 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jacob (Jake) Schweigert for writing the status report on Sockeye Salmon (Sakinaw population). This report was prepared under contract with Environment Canada and was overseen by Alan Sinclair, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Saumon sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka), population Sakinaw, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Sockeye Salmon — Mature Sockeye Salmon (female above, male below) (reprinted from Scott and Crossman, 1973). Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/323-2016E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-05567-1 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2016 Common name Sockeye Salmon - Sakinaw population Scientific name Oncorhynchus nerka Status Endangered Reason for designation This population experienced a very large decline in the 1980s and 1990s because of low ocean survival and over-fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 19 Conclusions 19.1 OBJECTIVES
    CHAPTER 19 Conclusions 19.1 OBJECTIVES The water quantity studies described in this Technical Supplement and Technical Supplement 3 - Water Quantity data were carried out to meet the following objectives contained in the Canada— British Columbia Okanagan Basin Agreement namely: a) To evaluate the existing hydrologic regime of the Basin. b) To evaluate means of regulating flows through storage and diversion. c) To evaluate means of augmenting and conserving the surface water supply within the Okanagan Basin. The conclusions which follow are based for the most part on the data pre- sented in this report. However, where necessary additional evaluation data contained in Technical Supplement 3 has been referred to in order to provide a more comprehensive summary. 19.2 EXISTING HYDROLOGIC REGIME A definition of the existing hydro-regime of the Basin required not only the determination of the total net inflow each year over the study period 1921 to 1970 inclusive, but also a breakdown of this flow according to principle tributaries and within each tributary according to elevation. At the start of the study it was recognized that such details could not be obtained accurately from existing records, and that if a reasonable understanding of the hydrological regime of the Basin was to be realized, improvements to the existing hydrometric and meteorological networks were required. Such instru- mentation has been carried out and arrangements have been made for the con- tinuation of this monitoring after the end of the study on March 31, 1974 with a proviso that it receive a further review in 1980. It is fortunate that during the period of the study (October 1969 to March 1974) some extreme hydrological events occurred including a drought year in 1970, and a flood year in 1972.
    [Show full text]