DOCSLIB.ORG

(Title of the Thesis)*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Title of the Thesis)* WATCHING THE WAR AND KEEPING THE PEACE: THE UNITED NATIONS TRUCE SUPERVISION ORGANIZATION (UNTSO) IN THE MIDDLE EAST, 1949-1956 by Andrew Gregory Theobald A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (May, 2009) Copyright ©Andrew Gregory Theobald, 2009 Abstract By virtue of their presence, observers alter what they are observing. Yet, the international soldiers of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) did much more than observe events. From August 1949 until the establishment of the United Nations Emergency Force in November 1956, the Western military officers assigned to UNTSO were compelled to take seriously the task of supervising the Arab-Israeli armistice, despite the unwillingness of all parties to accept an actual peace settlement. To the extent that a particular peacekeeping mission was successful – i.e., that peace was “kept” – what actually happened on the ground is usually considered far less important than broader politics. However, as efforts to forge a peace settlement failed one after another, UNTSO operations themselves became the most important mechanism for regional stability, particularly by providing a means by which otherwise implacable enemies could communicate with each other, thus helping to moderate the conflict. This communication played out against the backdrop of the dangerous early days of the Cold War, the crumbling of Western empires, and the emergence of the non- aligned movement. Analyses of the activities of the Mixed Armistice Commissions (MACs), the committees created to oversee the separate General Armistice Agreements signed between Israel and Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria, particularly those during the 1954 to 1956 tenure as UNTSO chief of staff of Canadian Major-General E.L.M. Burns, best evaluate both UNTSO effectiveness and Arab-Israeli interaction. ii Acknowledgements I learned more than I ever thought possible from the preparation of this dissertation. My supervisor, Professor Allan English, resolutely supported this work, providing both the freedom that allowed me to work independently and direct encouragement when required. The other members of my dissertation committee, Professors Bob Martyn, Kim Richard Nossal, Bob Shenton, and Dr. Dean Oliver of the Canadian War Museum, supplied valuable editing and thoughtful questions. Professor Sandra den Otter, History Department Graduate Assistant Yvonne Place, Rose Silva of the Queen’s School of Graduate Studies, and Sam Kalb assisted with the submission process. Overall, Queen’s University proved to be a wonderful place to train as an historian. As always, I would also like to thank my parents, Bronwyn McIntyre and Greg Theobald, for their love and support. My brothers, John and Simon, as well as my extended family and friends, were equally encouraging. At Queen’s, I also benefited from a vibrant military history fellowship, whose members included Howard Coombs, Richard Goette, Daniel Gosselin and Matt Trudgen. My students in History 322, “War and Modern Society,” were a constant encouragement as well as a beacon for the future of the field. Professor Marc Milner of the University of New Brunswick, Professor Jonathan Vance of the University of Western Ontario, and other academic colleagues such as Dr. Michael Carroll, Dr. Arthur ten Cate of the Netherlands Institute of Military History, and Dr. Jim Wood epitomized the term academic community. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) provided generous funding that supported the writing of this dissertation. The Canadian Friends of iii the Hebrew University of Jerusalem likewise sustained my year-long research fellowship at that institution. That position afforded me the opportunity to conduct extended research in the Middle East as well as the chance to familiarize myself first-hand with many of the locations that figured so crucially in this narrative. The United Nations Archives was the most important repository that I visited. Thanks to Monika Tkacova and the always helpful and well-trained staff of that shamefully underused archive, it was always a pleasure to work there. While in Israel, my research took me to the Israel State Archives, where Eden, Michal, and Shimrit deserve mention for their assistance. Additional support came from Doron Avi-Ad at the Israel Defence Force Archives and Haim Gal at the Arabic Press Archive of the Moshe Dayan Centre, Tel Aviv University. Translation assistance was provided by Efrat Shapir, Eti Shapir, Michael Barak, and Rami Livni. When I was unfortunately unable to visit the British National Archives in-person, research on my behalf was conducted by Bob O’Hara, Marione Hulverscheidt, and the exceptional – and wonderfully kind – Nina Staehle. Similar assistance was provided, both on-site and at a distance, by Marie-Eve Deleris, as well as the staff at Library and Archives Canada, the Belgian Diplomatic Archives, the Swedish Military Archives, and the Norwegian National Archives. The maps were prepared by Jennifer Grek Martin. All of that support pales in comparison to the encouragement of my wife, Efrat Shapir, and our daughter, Noori Jean, who was born in October 2008. In particular, Noori provided the most welcome distraction from dissertation work that anyone could ever hope to have. I would never have been able to complete this work without them. The errors that remain are my own. iv Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………….....v List of Maps……………………………………………………………………………....vi Note on Terms and Transliteration……………………………………………………....vii Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………viii Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review……………………………………………………………..18 Chapter 3 The First Years: August 1949-May 1953……………………………………..30 Chapter 4 Shifting Policies, Same Results: June 1953-August 1954……………………61 Chapter 5 The Arrival of General Burns: September-December 1954…………………..88 Chapter 6 What Can Stop the War? January-December 1955………………………….107 Chapter 7 Keeping the Peace: January-November 1956……………………………….142 Chapter 8 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...169 Appendix A S/1080, United Nations Security Council Resolution 62 (1948)…………187 Appendix B General Armistice Agreements (1949)……………………………………189 Appendix C S/1376, II, United Nations Security Council Resolution 73 (1949)………229 Appendix D “The 11 Points” (1954)…………………………………………………...232 Endnotes………………………………………………………………………………..234 Thematic Bibliography…………………………………………………………………276 Maps……………………………………………………………………………………287 v List of Maps Map 1, The Middle East, 1949………………………………………………………….287 Map 2, Egypt, the Gaza Strip, and Israel……………………………………………….288 Map 3, Israel, Jordan, and the West Bank……………………………………………...289 Map 4, Israel, Lebanon, and Syria……………………………………………………...290 vi Note on Terms and Transliteration Transliteration, the transfer of words from one alphabet to another – in this case from the Arabic and Hebrew alphabets to the Latin alphabet – remains an inexact practice. While no express transliteration format has been adhered to in this study, every effort has been made to ensure uniformity and avoid confusion. To that end, diacritical marks, which guide pronunciation, have been excluded. Likewise, Hebrew prefixes have been combined into the English wording; for example, rendering the Israeli newspaper Haaretz rather than ha Aretz. Military ranks, including those of the Israel Defence Force and the French Army, have been rendered in their British staff system equivalents; thus, lieutenant-colonel rather than sgan aluf and major rather than chef de bataillon. The Israeli practice of Hebraizing, changing “diaspora” surnames to “Israeli” ones, as in Aryeh Shalev (né Friedlander) explains occasional discrepancies in the narrative. Unless otherwise noted, all translations are my own. vii Abbreviations ADL – Armistice Demarcation Line BDA – Belgian Diplomatic Archives BNA – British National Archives DFPI – Documents on the Foreign Policy of Israel DL – Demarcation Line DZ – Demilitarized Zone EIMAC – Egypt-Israel Mixed Armistice Commission FM – Israeli Foreign Ministry FO – British Foreign Office FRUS – Foreign Relations of the United States GAA – General Armistice Agreement GAS – General Assembly Resolution GSO – General Staff Officer HJKIMAC – Hashemite Jordan Kingdom-Israel Mixed Armistice Commission HQ – Headquarters i/c – In Command ICSC – International Commission of Supervision and Control in Indochina IDF – Israel Defence Force IDFA – Israel Defence Force Archives ILMAC – Israel-Lebanon Mixed Armistice Commission ISA – Israel State Archives ISMAC – Israel-Syria Mixed Armistice Commission LAC – Library and Archives Canada LCA – Local Commanders’ Agreement MAC – Mixed Armistice Commission MEDO – Middle East Defence Organization MO – Military Observer NATO – North Atlantic Treaty Organization N.D. – No Date S/ - Security Council Resolution SMA – Swedish Military Archives UN – United Nations UNA – United Nations Archives UNCCP – United Nations Conciliation Committee for Palestine UNEF – United Nations Emergency Force UNMO – United Nations Military Observer UNMOGIP – United Nations Military Observer Group, India-Pakistan UNOGIL – United Nations Observer Group in Lebanon UNRWA – United Nations Relief and Works Agency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Negotiating in Times of Conflict
    cover Negotiating in Times of Conflict Gilead Sher and Anat Kurz, Editors Institute for National Security Studies The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research. Negotiating in Times of Conflict Gilead Sher and Anat Kurz, Editors משא ומתן בעת סכסוך גלעד שר וענת קורץ, עורכים Graphic design: Michal Semo-Kovetz and Yael Bieber Cover design: Tali Niv-Dolinsky Printing: Elinir Institute for National Security Studies (a public benefit company) 40 Haim Levanon Street POB 39950 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv 6997556 Israel Tel. +972-3-640-0400 Fax. +972-3-744-7590 E-mail: [email protected] http:// www.inss.org.il © 2015 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian S. Lustick
    MIDDLE EAST POLICY, VOL. XV, NO. 3, FALL 2008 ABANDONING THE IRON WALL: ISRAEL AND “THE MIDDLE EASTERN MUCK” Ian S. Lustick Dr. Lustick is the Bess W. Heyman Chair of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of Trapped in the War on Terror. ionists arrived in Palestine in the the question of whether Israel and Israelis 1880s, and within several de- can remain in the Middle East without cades the movement’s leadership becoming part of it. Zrealized it faced a terrible pre- At first, Zionist settlers, land buyers, dicament. To create a permanent Jewish propagandists and emissaries negotiating political presence in the Middle East, with the Great Powers sought to avoid the Zionism needed peace. But day-to-day intractable and demoralizing subject of experience and their own nationalist Arab opposition to Zionism. Publicly, ideology gave Zionist leaders no reason to movement representatives promulgated expect Muslim Middle Easterners, and false images of Arab acceptance of especially the inhabitants of Palestine, to Zionism or of Palestinian Arab opportuni- greet the building of the Jewish National ties to secure a better life thanks to the Home with anything but intransigent and creation of the Jewish National Home. violent opposition. The solution to this Privately, they recognized the unbridgeable predicament was the Iron Wall — the gulf between their image of the country’s systematic but calibrated use of force to future and the images and interests of the teach Arabs that Israel, the Jewish “state- overwhelming majority of its inhabitants.1 on-the-way,” was ineradicable, regardless With no solution of their own to the “Arab of whether it was perceived by them to be problem,” they demanded that Britain and just.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005
    Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005 BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights i BADIL is a member of the Global Palestine Right of Return Coalition Preface The Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons is published annually by BADIL Resource Center. The Survey provides an overview of one of the largest and longest-standing unresolved refugee and displaced populations in the world today. It is estimated that two out of every five of today’s refugees are Palestinian. The Survey has several objectives: (1) It aims to provide basic information about Palestinian displacement – i.e., the circumstances of displacement, the size and characteristics of the refugee and displaced population, as well as the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons; (2) It aims to clarify the framework governing protection and assistance for this displaced population; and (3) It sets out the basic principles for crafting durable solutions for Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, consistent with international law, relevant United Nations Resolutions and best practice. In short, the Survey endeavors to address the lack of information or misinformation about Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, and to counter political arguments that suggest that the issue of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons can be resolved outside the realm of international law and practice applicable to all other refugee and displaced populations. The Survey examines the status of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons on a thematic basis. Chapter One provides a short historical background to the root causes of Palestinian mass displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS)
    P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS) The purpose of the Jaffee Center is, first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel's national security as well as Middle East regional and international secu- rity affairs. The Center also aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are - or should be - at the top of Israel's national security agenda. The Jaffee Center seeks to address the strategic community in Israel and abroad, Israeli policymakers and opinion-makers and the general public. The Center relates to the concept of strategy in its broadest meaning, namely the complex of processes involved in the identification, mobili- zation and application of resources in peace and war, in order to solidify and strengthen national and international security. To Jasjit Singh with affection and gratitude P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Memorandum no. 55, March 2000 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies 6 P. R. Kumaraswamy Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel Tel. 972 3 640-9926 Fax 972 3 642-2404 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/ ISBN: 965-459-041-7 © 2000 All rights reserved Graphic Design: Michal Semo Printed by: Kedem Ltd., Tel Aviv Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations 7 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Turkey: from Covert to Overt Relations
    Israel and Turkey: From Covert to Overt Relations by Jacob Abadi INTRODUCTION Diplomatic relations between Israel and Turkey have existed since the Jewish state came into being in 1948, however, they have remained covert until recently. Contacts between the two countries have continued despite Turkey's condemnation of Israel in the UN and other official bodies. Frequent statements made by Turkish officials regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Palestinian dilemma give the impression that Turco-Israeli relations have been far more hostile than is actually the case. Such an image is quite misleading, for throughout the years political, commercial, cultural and even military contacts have been maintained between the two countries. The purpose of this article is to show the extent of cooperation between the two countries and to demonstrate how domestic as well as external constraints have affected the diplomatic ties between them. It will be argued that during the first forty years of Israel's existence relations between the two countries remained cordial. Both sides kept a low profile and did not reveal the nature of these ties. It was only toward the end of the 1980s, when the international political climate underwent a major upheaval, that the ties between the two countries became official and overt. Whereas relations with Israel constituted a major problem in Turkish diplomacy, Israeli foreign policy was relatively free from hesitations and constraints. For Israeli foreign policy makers it was always desirable to establish normal relations with Turkey, whose location on the periphery of the Middle East gave it great strategic importance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust: Factor in the Birth of Israel? by Evyatar Friesel
    The Holocaust: Factor in the Birth of Israel? by Evyatar Friesel It is widely believed that the catastrophe of European Jewry during World War II had a decisive influence on the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948. According to this thesis, for the Jews the Holocaust triggered a supreme effort toward statehood, based on the understanding that only a Jewish state might again avoid the horrors of the 1940s. For the nations of the world, shocked by the horror of the extermination and burdened by feelings of guilt, the Holocaust convinced them that the Jews were entitled to a state of their own. All these assumptions seem extremely doubtful. They deserve careful re-examination in light of the historical evidence. Statehood in Zionist Thought The quest for a Jewish state had always been paramount in Zionist thought and action. For tactical reasons official Zionism was cautious in explaining its ultimate aims, especially when addressing general public opinion. Terms other than "state" were used in various political documents or official utterances by leading Zionist statesmen: Jewish home, Jewish National Home, commonwealth, Jewish commonwealth. But there is no reason to doubt that the ultimate aim of the Zionist mainstream was the creation of a state in Palestine. The question remained as to what methods should be used in order to reach the consummation of these hopes. One possibility was the evolutionary path, implied also in the political relations between the Zionists and leading British statesmen between 1917 and 1920. It found implicit expression in the terms and the structure of the Palestine Mandate approved by the League of Nations in July 1922.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 162 January 2012
    Applied Research Institute ‐ Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Volume 162, January 2012 Issue http://www.arij.org The Monthly overview report gives a list of the Israeli Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory which are The text is not quoted directly based on reports provided by field workers and\or by one or from the sources but is edited more of the following news sources: Al‐Ayyam daily for clarity. newspaper, Al‐Quds daily newspaper, Haaretz Daily Newspaper, Israel National News, The Jerusalem Post ‐ The daily report does not English‐language daily newspaper, Paltoday news‐website, necessarily reflect ARIJ’s Palpress news website, Palestine News Agency‐Wafa, opinion. Palestine News Network, Maʹan News Agency, Al Jazeera News Channel, Israel National News, and Yediot Ahronot – English website. Bethlehem • The Israeli occupation soldiers stormed several Palestinian houses in Beit Fajjar town south of Bethlehem city and messed with their contents. Al Quds (January 4, 2012). • The Israeli Occupation Army set up military checkpoint at the western entrance of Beit Jala city, at the DCO checkpoint area, and conducted military operations, checking the ID cards of Palestinians accessing the checkpoint and caused obstruction to the vehicular and pedestrian movements. Al Quds (January 5, 2012). • The Israeli occupation Authorities issued a second amendment and extension of validity to a previously issued military number 136/05/t which was issued back in 2005 and stated the confiscation of 115 dunums of lands of Khallet An Nahla and Wad Rahhal south of Bethlehem city for the construction of the Israeli Segregation wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Procedures on Intensified Yitzhar Settler Violence
    Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Procedures on Intensified Yitzhar Settler Violence Date: 17 February 2021 For the attention of: - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, Mr. S. Michael Lynk; - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Ms. Tlaleng Mofokeng; - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, Mr. Balakrishnan Rajagopal; - The United Nation Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation; Mr. Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, and - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Ms. E. Tendayi Achiume. 1. Overview Settler attacks against the protected Palestinian population and their properties in the occupied West Bank are a widespread, long-term, and worsening phenomenon. Such attacks are reinforced by Israel’s systematic failure to conduct effective investigations and prosecutions of offending settler, creating a climate of impunity. Highlighting this failure, the United Nations International Fact-Finding Mission on Settlements concluded in its 2013 report that “there is institutionalised discrimination against the Palestinian people when it comes to addressing violence.”1 While Al-Haq does not document every settler violence attack carried out, Al-Haq’s field researchers documented 197 settler attacks in 2020,2
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Initiative: Reflections on Ariel Sharon Parashat Bo January 4, 2014 Rabbi Carl M
    Taking the Initiative: Reflections on Ariel Sharon Parashat Bo January 4, 2014 Rabbi Carl M. Perkins Temple Aliyah, Needham In today’s parashah, we read of the increasingly tense standoff between Pharoah and Moses. Last week, and again this week, we read about plague after plague, as the struggle continues. And yet we know that this conflict will eventually come to an end, with the Israelites victorious as they depart Egypt defiantly, b’yad ramah. The Israelites will defeat their foes in a manner that is almost impossible to conceive of today: without lifting a finger to defend themselves; in fact, without at all fighting their enemies. They’ll be free because God is on their side. Throughout the Exodus story, the use of physical force by humans is disparaged. We do have that story of the Egyptian taskmaster beating the Israelite. Moses intervenes, but is then not fully appreciated, and is even condemned the next day. The bottom line is that the entire people is rescued in a cosmic, mythic, epic scene that is far different from the battlefields of modern warfare. For generations, this model worked very well. For two thousand years, in fact. But although the story inspired liberation struggles all over the world among the powerless against the powerful, although the story bought hope to millions, it had nothing to offer those who were actively fighting for their freedom. It was of limited value to those actually fighting for their freedom. In fact, it was ultimately rejected by those who believed that it was necessary to fight, and not only to pray, for freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Hebron Hills
    THE SOUTH HEBRON HILLS SOLDIERS TESTIMONIES 2010-2016 Breaking the Silence's activities are made possible through the generous support of individuals and foundations including: AECID, Bertha Foundation, Broederlijk Delen , CCFD , Dan Church Aid , Die Schwelle , the Delegation of the European Union to the State of Israel , Foundation for Middle East Peace , medico international , MISEREOR , The Moriah Fund , New Israel Fund , NGO Development Center (NDC), Open Society Foundations , OXFAM, Pro-Victimis Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund , Sigrid Rausing Trust , SIVMO , Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs , Trócaire, ZIVIK and the countless private individuals who have made contributions to our work over the past year . This list represents a list of donors correct to the date of publication. The contents and opinions of this publication do not represent those of our donors or partners and are the sole responsibility of Breaking the Silence. THE SOUTH HEBRON HILLS SOLDIERS TESTIMONIES 2010-2016 ISRAELI SOLDIERS TALK ABOUT THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES Introduction The South Hebron Hills is the southernmost part of the West Bank and includes the Palestinian towns of Yatta, Dura, Dhahiriyah, and the surrounding rural areas. The region includes approximately 122 Palestinian communities which together house close to 70,000 people, as well as roughly 8,500 settlers who live in settlements and unauthorized outposts affiliated with the Mount Hebron Regional Council.* The Palestinian population of the South Hebron Hills is primarily composed of Bedouin, as well as fellahin (farmers or agricultural laborers) cave dwellers, who lead a rural traditional lifestyle, earning their living primarily from agricultural work and sheep herding. Some are refugees who arrived in the West Bank after being expelled from Israel in 1948 and the years that followed, while others are descendants of families who have been living in the area for hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Eytan 20 Jun 1990 Transcript
    United Nations Oral History Project Walter Eytan 20 June 1990 r _. • ,<; .. iJ (()~ ~ NO~J-CIRCULATI NG ) YUN INTERVIEW lJ'" llBRf\R'LlBR;.\ t"!' . F( i Gr ~­~- . ·'·'::::··,':;·'WALTER·'·'::::··.':;·'WALTER EYTAN ~ ~lr.J\~lr.J\!! : -~-'~, "' .... JUNE 20, 1990"1990 .. ,'U"'~~U'"'t''''1''1'l '.,J:'-C)LL'[ I ~ ......."",1"':Ll J "'co""""',,",,,,,, _ NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK INTERVIEWER, JEAN KRASNO TABLE OF CONTENTCONTENTSS FOUNDING OF THE STATE OF ISRAEISRAELL positions Held by Mr. Eytan • . 1,2,4 The Jewish Agency ••• • . ... 2-5,7,10,11 The New York Delegation ... 4,5 statehood and Partition •••. • . ...... 6-9 UN Special Committee on Palestine .... 6-8,12,28 General Assembly ••••••.•....•... • • • • . • . • . .7,8,11 Jerusalem •••••• .- ••.....•.... 8-12,26,28,40 The Fighting •••• • • . ...11,12,24,29,39,40 The British Role . .13,18,19,21 Declaring Independence .15-18 The Palestine Committee . ... ... 19-21 The Truce •• . ... 22-24 UN Mediation •••••• • • • • . .25,26,27 Armistice Negotiations at Rhodes . .27-41 UN Conciliation Commission ...35,44,45 Mixed Armistice Commission • .39,41 UNTSO . ... •••••••......... • • • • . 42 1 JK: For the record, Mr. Eytan, could you please explain thethe role that you played during the time around thethe establishment of the state of Israel approximately between the years of 1947 and 1949? When did your involvement with Palestine begin? EytanEytan:: My involvement with Palestine began much earlier, inin 1933. But in 1933 there was no UN and all thesethese questions that you are raising don't really apply. In 1947 I was in Jerusalem. I was a member of the political department of the Jewish Agency for Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Military and Strategic Affairs Strategic Affairs Volume 1 | No
    Military Military and Military and Strategic Affairs Strategic Strategic Affairs Volume 1 | No. 3 | December 2009 Volume 1 Volume Hizbollah’s Force Buildup of 2006-2009: Foundations and Future Trends Guy Aviad | No. 3 No. Intelligence and the Challenges of High Trajectory Fire | December 2009 Amir Kulick War and Victory Gabriel Siboni The IDF and the Road to a More Professional Military Yuval Bazak The US Military in Iraq and the IDF in Judea and Samaria Giora Segal Warfare against Insurgencies: 1 The Theory behind the Practice Tal Tovy ÈÓ‡φÔÂÁËÈ·†È¯˜ÁÓφÔÂÎÓ‰ THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY ·È·‡≠Ï˙†˙ËÈÒ¯·È‡ ÈÓ‡φÔÂÁËÈ·†È¯˜ÁÓφÔÂÎÓ‰ THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY ·È·‡≠Ï˙†˙ËÈÒ¯·È‡· Military and Strategic Affairs Volume 1 | No. 3 | December 2009 CONTENTS Hizbollah’s Force Buildup of 2006-2009: Foundations and Future Trends | 3 Guy Aviad Intelligence and the Challenges of High Trajectory Fire | 23 Amir Kulick War and Victory | 39 Gabriel Siboni The IDF and the Road to a More Professional Military | 51 Yuval Bazak The US Military in Iraq and the IDF in Judea and Samaria | 69 Giora Segal Warfare against Insurgencies: The Theory behind the Practice | 83 Tal Tovy Military and The purpose of Military and Strategic Affairs is to stimulate Strategic Affairs and enrich the public debate on military issues relating to Israel’s national security. Military and Strategic Affairs is published three times a year within the framework of the Military and Strategic Affairs Program at the Institute for National Security Studies.
    [Show full text]