Optical and Magneto-Optic Kerr Effects of Mnbi, Ni2mnga, and Gd5si2ge2 Joong-Mok Park Iowa State University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2004 Optical and magneto-optic Kerr effects of MnBi, Ni2MnGa, and Gd5Si2Ge2 Joong-mok Park Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Condensed Matter Physics Commons, and the Optics Commons Recommended Citation Park, Joong-mok, "Optical and magneto-optic Kerr effects of MnBi, Ni2MnGa, and Gd5Si2Ge2 " (2004). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 1117. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/1117 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Optical and magneto-optic Kerr effects of MnBi, NigMnGa, and Gd^SigGeg by Joong-mok Park A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Condensed Matter Physics Program of Study Committee: David W. Lynch, Co-major Professor Bruce N Harmon, Co-major Professor Paul C. Canfield John M. Hauptman R. William McCallum Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2004 UMI Number: 3145677 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3145677 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation of Joong-mok Park has met the dissertation requirements of Iowa State University Signature was redacted for privacy. Co-major Professor Signature was redacted for privacy. Co-major Professor Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Major F^ gram iii TABLE OF CONTENTS NOMENCLATURE xii ABSTRACT xiv 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICAL THEORY 7 2.1 Electromagnetic field in a solid 7 2.2 Jones vectors and matrices to describe polarized light 10 2.3 Macroscopic explanation of magneto-optic effect 11 2.4 Classical microscopic theory 15 2.4.1 Classical Lorentz-Drude model for dielectric constants 16 2.4.2 Diagonal component of dielectric constants exx 16 2.4.3 Off-diagonal component of dielectric constants exy 20 2.4.4 Skew-scattering theory 21 2.5 Quantum-mechanical theory for MOKE 23 2.5.1 The origin of MOKE 25 2.5.2 Electron band structure and optical conductivity calculation 28 3. EXPERIMENT 32 3.1 Magneto-optic Kerr effect experiment 32 3.2 MOKE with Jones vectors and matrices 35 3.3 Calibration of Kerr signal 37 3.3.1 Kerr angle calibration 38 3.3.2 Kerr ellipticity calibration 39 iv 3.4 Reflectance difference for anisotropic materials 41 3.5 Three-phase model for a thin film on the sample 43 3.6 Ellipsometry experiment 46 3.6.1 Ellipsometry for anisotropic materials 46 4. MnBi 49 4.1 Introduction 49 4.2 Electronic structure calculation of MnBi 52 4.3 Experiment 55 4.4 Results 58 5. NigMnGa 64 5.1 Introduction 64 5.2 Experiment 67 5.3 Band structure calculation 68 5.4 Results 73 6. Gd5Si2Ge2 82 6.1 Introduction 82 6.2 Experiment 86 6.3 Results 88 7. DISCUSSION 100 8. CONCLUSION 102 APPENDIX A. JONES VECTORS AND MATRICES 104 A.l Jones vectors to describe polarized light 104 A.2 Jones matrices to describe optical components 104 APPENDIX B. USEFUL RELATIONS 106 APPENDIX C. BRILLOUIN ZONE 108 C.l Simple cubic lattice 109 C.2 Body-centered cubic lattice 110 V C.3 Face-centered cubic lattice Ill C.4 Hexagonal closed-packed lattice 112 APPENDIX D. ELECTRON-PHOTON INTERACTION ENERGY .... 113 BIBLIOGRAPHY 114 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 121 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Two types of magneto-optic effect when linearly polarized light is inci dent on the sample : Faraday effect for transmission and Kerr effect for reflection in polar geometry 3 Figure 1.2 Linearly and elliptically polarized states (a) An incident linearly po larized wave before MOKE, (b) An elliptically polarized wave after reflection from the magnetized sample 5 Figure 2.1 (a) Linearly polarized light decomposes into RCP and LCP with the convention of exp(-iujt). (b) After reflection the phases and ampli tudes of the RCP and the LCP are changed and the sum of them are elliptically polarized. The definitions of RCP and LCP are changed with the convention of exp(iu)t) 12 Figure 2.2 Real (£ixx) and imaginary faxx) parts of the interband dielectric con stants from the Lorentz model with Hujo = 4.0 eV, TiUp = 5.0 eV, and hj = 0.5 eV 17 Figure 2.3 Real (eiXx) and imaginary {e^xx) parts of the intraband dielectric con stants from the Drude model with fou)p = 5.0 eV, fry = 0.5 eV 19 vii Figure 2.4 (a) Spin-split states with exchange and spin-orbit interaction energy. The solid and dotted lines represent right- and left-circular polariza tion, respectively, (b) Optical transition matrix elements for each spin state, (c) Absorptive part of the diagonal component of the optical conductivity. The bold and narrow lines represent spin-up and -down contributions, (d) Absorptive part of the off-diagonal component of the optical conductivity 27 Figure 3.1 Experimental setup for MOKE (M: modulator, PMT: photomultiplier tube, P: polarizer, A: analyzer, DVM: digital voltmeter, PEM: piezo electric modulator, F: filter) 33 Figure 3.2 Energy-dependent calibration constants A and B. The lines are the fitting results after finishing the calibrations 40 Figure 3.3 3-phase model of a thin film on the sample. r\2 is the reflection coeffi cient at the first interface between air and the thin film and ?2z is for interface of the thin film and sample 43 Figure 4.1 MnBi (low-temperature phase) hexagonal crystal structure. The dark spheres represent Bi atoms and gray ones represent Mn atoms 50 Figure 4.2 Calculated Kerr rotations and Kerr rotation measured on single-crystal MnBi. Theoretical spectra are taken from Jaswal et al. (open squares) [60], Oppeneer et al. (dashed line) [61], Kôhler and Kiibler (thick line) [63], Ravindran et al. (asterisks) [64], Kulatov et al. (dotted line) [65], and measured Kerr spectra (closed squares) from single-crystal MnBi. 53 Figure 4.3 Spin-polarized MnBi band structure calculated with the LMTO-ASA code. The solid line represents majority spin and dashed line represents minority spin. See appendix for the symmetry lines 56 Figure 4.4 Total and partial DOS of MnBi calculated with the LMTO-ASA code. 57 viii Figure 4.5 MnBi powder X-ray diffraction pattern. The peaks indicate an MnBi phase and a minority Bi phase 59 Figure 4.6 Measured Kerr rotations of MnBi thin films and a single crystal MnBi (closed squares). Thin film data are taken from Di et al. (open squares) [55], Fumagalli et al. (open circles) [57], Huang et al. (open triangles) [56] 60 Figure 4.7 Calculated MOKE spectra with the TB-LMTO ASA method with spin- orbit interaction. Drude terms are included in the calculations 62 Figure 5.1 Fee crystal structure of the NigMnGa Heusler alloy. Ga, Ni, Mn, Ni atoms are located along the body diagonal 65 Figure 5.2 Spin-polarized band structure of the fee structured NigMnGa Heusler alloy. The spin-orbit interaction was not included. The solid and dotted lines represent majority and minority band, respectively. See appendix for the symmetry lines 70 Figure 5.3 Total and partial DOS of the fee structured NigMnGa Heusler alloy calculated with spin-polarized TB-LMTO method. The upper halves are majority spins and the lower ones are minority spins 71 Figure 5.4 Calculated Kerr effects for the fee Ni^MnGa Heusler alloy. The solid and dotted lines are Kerr spectra with and without the Drude term. 72 Figure 5.5 (a) Real part, £\, and (b) imaginary part, £2. of the diagonal component of the dielectric function of the Ni^MnGa Heusler alloy (100) and (110) surfaces measured with ellipsometry. Insert in (b) represents the optical conductivity 74 Figure 5.6 Calculated real (eixx) and imaginary (e2xx) parts of the dielectric con stants iTotal = £mtra çDrude including the intraband and Drude term. Measured ones (squares) with the (100) plane sample were also plotted for the comparison 75 ix Figure 5.7 Magneto-optic Kerr spectra of the Ni2MnGa Heusler alloy. The calcu lated Kerr rotation and ellipticity were scaled by 50 % 77 Figure 5.8 Magneto-optic Kerr spectra of the Ni (100) and (110) plane single crystals. 79 Figure 5.9 Complex off-diagonal component of the dielectric function of NigMnGa converted from the measured Kerr spectra. The solid lines are calcu lated with the TB-LMTO methods and scaled by 50 % 81 Figure 6.1 Interaction of polarized light with an anisotropic material at near nor mal incidence. Linearly polarized light is incident at angle from one of the crystal axes. 0o„t is not the same as 6a for the particular direction of an anisotropic material 83 Figure 6.2 Orthorhombic a-phase GdgSigGeg crystal structure.