Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Eac Application Part B Section 6.4 Visual Quality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Eac Application Part B Section 6.4 Visual Quality PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT EAC APPLICATION PART B SECTION 6.4 VISUAL QUALITY 6.4 VISUAL QUALITY Visual Quality – Summary of Assessment . The Project is located within a predominately urban residential and industrial land use setting that includes several residential, commercial, recreational, and industrial areas and transportation infrastructure. At night these areas also have visible light sources. During daytime viewing the Project could potentially change the visual quality in the area due to an increase in the visibility of infrastructure and a change in its visual character. During night-time viewing Project-related temporary construction lighting and permanent street and navigational lighting could potentially change the existing lighting conditions. Potential Project-related residual effects on visual quality could arise during construction and operations as result of: o A change in daytime views o A change in night-time views . Key mitigation measures include: Lighting plan o o Landscape plan o Communication and engagement with the community . No significant Project-related residual or cumulative effects on visual quality are expected. 6.4.1 Context and Boundaries This section describes the context for assessment of potential Project-related effects on the Visual Quality Valued Component (VC). It includes the selection and rationale of the Visual Quality VC, subcomponents, and indicators, an overview of the regulatory context, and the definition and rationale for the spatial, temporal, administrative, and technical assessment boundaries. 6.4.1.1 Valued Component Selection Visual Quality has been identified as a Valued Component in the Valued Components Selection and Rationale Document for the Project. The following provides additional rationale for the assessment of Project effects on visual quality. 6.4.1.1.1 Rationale for Selection of Visual Quality For the purposes of this assessment, the term “Visual Quality” refers to the visual aesthetic aspects of a landscape, which are often related to public enjoyment of scenic views and concerns over the visual impact of development. These matters are of interest in an area where scenic landscapes provide the context for residential, recreational, and tourism activities, such as within Metro Vancouver, including urban areas along the Fraser River. 6.4-1 PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT EAC APPLICATION PART B SECTION 6.4 VISUAL QUALITY The Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project (Project) has the potential to affect visual quality as a result of the visibility of the construction and operation of the new Pattullo Bridge and associated approaches, interchanges, and road extensions in the City of New Westminster and the City of Surrey. The Project overlaps parts of federal land and water under the jurisdiction of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (VFPA). Public and stakeholder consultation, ongoing consultation between MoTI and Aboriginal Groups, and related Project-specific studies have identified concerns related to effects on visual quality. As such, visual quality is a component of the human environment that is considered to have Aboriginal, regulatory, and social importance. An assessment was undertaken to determine the existing visual quality of the landscape setting surrounding the Project and to examine the potential for visual effects from the Project components and activities. The assessment fulfills the requirements of the BC Environmental Assessment Act and the VFPA Project Environmental Review (PER) process as laid out in the Application Information Requirements (AIR) for the Project (posted on EAO website ePic). The assessment of visual effects is considered a pathway to support the assessment of the following VCs: . Marine Use VC . Land Use VC The assessment of visual effects also contributes to the assessment of current land and resource use for traditional purposes (Section 11.0) and Aboriginal Interests (Section 12.0). The evaluation of visual effects was informed by the assessments of Lighting and Shading, which are considered pathways to support the Visual Quality VC. Section 6.5 Lighting assesses the environmental setting and effects to perceived lighting conditions (i.e., configuration of light sources and related level of brightness) at selected receptor locations during the night-time, whereas Section 6.6 Shading assesses the environmental setting and effects to the pattern of shadow (i.e., visible extent and form of shadow cast by objects surrounding the Project) during the daytime. The selected subcomponents for the Visual Quality VC are Daytime Viewing to address effects associated with the perception of Project-related changes to visual quality that are visible during daylight hours, and Night-time Viewing to address effects associated with the visibility of Project-related lighting and changes to visual quality during night-time hours. Table 6.4-1 summarizes the subcomponents of the Visual Quality VC. Table 6.4-1 Subcomponents of Visual Quality Valued Component Subcomponent Rationale for Selection Daytime Viewing The Project could potentially affect daytime viewing conditions and visual quality for residents and visitors (e.g., recreational and tourism users). Night-time Viewing An increase in light levels from Project-related operational street and navigational lighting that could alter night-time viewing conditions and visual quality from nearby locations. 6.4-2 PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT EAC APPLICATION PART B SECTION 6.4 VISUAL QUALITY 6.4.1.1.2 Indicators of Potential Effects The assessment of potential Project effects on Visual Quality evaluates the level of change to visual quality from current viewing conditions for the Daytime Viewing and Nighttime Viewing sub-components. The following parameters were used to analyze and characterize potential effects: . Visibility of the Project – for daytime viewing, refers to the visible extent and prominence of Project components from key viewing locations; for night-time viewing, refers to the visibility of Project light sources from key viewing locations. Visual contrast of the Project – for daytime viewing, refers to the visual character of Project components and the resulting level of visual contrast between the Project and the existing landscape setting from key viewing locations. The determination of visual contrast is used further for visual impact assessment to characterize the effects of visual contrast on potential viewers. For night-time viewing, contrast refers to a change in perceived lighting levels related to Project lighting from key viewing locations. The assessment adapted established standards and guidelines and qualitative definitions were used to compare pre-Project (baseline) and Project-related viewing conditions. Table 6.4-2 summarizes the indicators and measurable parameters for each subcomponent of the Visual Quality VC. Table 6.4-2 Indicators for Assessment of Potential Effects for Visual Quality Subcomponent Indicators Measurable Parameter Daytime Viewing Level of change in visual quality from . Visibility of Project features and their visual current daytime viewing conditions prominence from key viewpoints . Visual contrast of Project features with the existing visual character and the resulting visual impact to viewers from key viewpoints Night-time Viewing Level of change in visual quality from . Visibility of Project lighting from key viewpoints current night-time viewing conditions . Change in perceived light levels from key viewpoints 6.4.1.2 Regulatory Context The Project site is located within the Metro Vancouver area of British Columbia and overlaps portions of New Westminster, Surrey, and federal land and water under the jurisdiction of the VFPA. Existing relevant information and planning documents on visual resources, obtrusive lighting, and shade management were reviewed to understand the regional context for visual quality management during daytime and night-time. This included a review of the British Columbia Visual Landscape Inventory (VLI) database (MFLNRO 2011); the British Columbia Strategic Land and Resource Plans (SLRP) listing (MFLNRO n.d.); regional and municipal planning guidance and bylaws for Metro Vancouver, New Westminster, and Surrey; and the VFPA land use plan and permitting process. The regulatory and policy setting of the Project as it relates to the management of visual quality is summarized below. The analysis of Project visual effects provides information relevant to subsection 5(1) and 5(2) of CEAA 2012 related to effects on federal lands and effects on Aboriginal peoples. 6.4-3 PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT EAC APPLICATION PART B SECTION 6.4 VISUAL QUALITY Within British Columbia, visual resources are managed under the authority of the Forest and Range Practices Act (MFLNRO 2002) and through policy within higher-level SLRPs that draw on the application of the Visual Resource Management (VRM) system of the BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (FLNRORD). The VRM system provides a systematic framework for managing visual resources on forested landscapes through the use of inventories of visually sensitive areas throughout the province and the designation of visual quality objectives for each area. A review of the VLI database identified no established visually sensitive areas or management objectives within the Metro Vancouver area. Similarly, no SLRPs have been developed for the Metro Vancouver area. Regional, municipal, and public authorities may provide visual design
Recommended publications
  • Appendix(2*I(–(Written(Submissions
    Appendix(2*I(–(Written(Submissions( ( ! ! Dec(18,(2012( Ironically,!I!was!unable!to!attend!tonight!as!a!result!of!spending!90!minutes!driving!from!Surrey! to!Richmond!this!morning!due!to!the!snowfall.!As!a!general!rule,!I!travel!to!Richmond!via!the! Alex!Fraser!Bridge!because!of!the!capacity!constraint!called!the!George!Massey!Tunnel.!Traffic! congestion!is!apparent!throughout!a!larger!percentage!of!each!day.!It!is!likely!that!near!gridlock! from!dawn!to!dusk!will!become!a!chronic!condition!of!Highway!99!within!the!foreseeable!future.! The!replacement!of!the!existing!tunnel!with!a!sixGlane!structure!might!relieve!the!congestion!for! a!while,!particularly!if!the!Stevenson!and!River/Ladner!Trunk!Road!access!issues!are! simultaneously!addressed.!However,!such!a!fix!is!likely!to!be!temporary!in!nature!(like!the! twinning!of!Highway!10)!due!to!the!continued!population!growth!along!the!Surrey!–!Langley! corridor,!the!limited!number!of!routes!across!the!Fraser!River!and!the!exceedingly!poor!public! transit!system!south!of!the!Fraser!River.!The!only!way!for!area!residents!to!realistically!travel!to! work!or!school!is!via!automobile.!Short!of!banning!future!housing!developments!east!of!Delta,! the!replacement!of!the!local!tunnel!by!itself!is!only!a!temporary!fix.! The!transportation!network!must!be!treated!as!an!integrated!system,!a!fact!was!apparent!today.! Snowfall!resulted!in!accidents!on!the!Pattullo!and!Queensborough!bridges,!creating!gridlock! across!the!Fraser!River.!Drivers!redirected!their!vehicles!along!Highways!10!and!99,!creating! dozens!of!kilometers!of!congestion!leading!north!up!to!the!George!Massey!Tunnel.!
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and Council From
    City of Delta COUNCIL REPORT F.07 Regular Meeting To: Mayor and Council From: Corporate Services Department Date: February 21, 2018 George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project Update The following recommendations have been endorsed by the Acting City Manager. • RECOMMENDATION: THAT copies of this report be provided to: • Honourable Marc Garneau, Minister of Transport • Honourable Carla Qualtrough, Member of Parliament for Delta • Chief Bryce Williams, Tsawwassen First Nation • Honourable Claire Trevena, Minister of Transportation & Infrastructure • Ravi Kahlon, MLA Delta-North • Ian Paton, MLA Delta-South • Metro Vancouver Board of Directors • Mayors' Council on Regional Transportation • PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to provide an update on some of the key issues related to the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project (GMTRP), particularly in light of the Province's recent announcement regarding the Pattullo Bridge, and to provide a consolidated summary for Council's information. • BACKGROUND: On February 16, 2018, the BC government announced that it is moving forward with the construction of a $1.38 billion bridge to replace the Pattullo Bridge. This raises some questions regarding the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project, which has been on a five-month hiatus since the Province announced last September that it was undertaking an independent technical review of the crossing. Both projects are badly needed; however, unlike the Pattullo project which is only part-way through the environmental assessment process, the tunnel replacement project is shovel-ready, has received its environmental assessment certificate and has completed the bidding process. Furthermore, in terms of both vehicular and transit traffic, the George Massey Tunnel carries Page 2 of 5 GMTRP Update February 21 , 2018 significantly higher volumes than the Pattullo Bridge (Attachments 'A' and 'B' show the volumes for all the Fraser River crossings).
    [Show full text]
  • George Massey Tunnel Expansion Plan Study
    Report to MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS i On GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL EXPANSION PLANNING STUDY TTaffic Impact Taffic Operations Parking ransit Tansportation rucking Planning Modelling 4 March 26, 1991 Ministry of Transportation and Highways South Coast Regional District 7818 Sixth Street Burnaby, B.C. V3N 4N8; Attention:: Ms. Maria Swan, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Dear Sir: RE: Expansion of George Massey Tunnel - Preliminary Planning Studv In accordance with your instructions, we have now carried out the preliminary planning study of the future expansion of the George Massey Tunnel on Highway 99. The attached report presents an overview of the study together with the resultant conclusions and recommendations. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project on behalf of the Ministry. I trust that this report enables your staff to continue with the next steps necessary to bring these recommendations to fruition. 145gmasy\gmt.rpt 520 - 1112 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2S1 Tel: (604) 688-8826 Fax: 688-9562 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 1.1 Background to Study ....................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Study ........................................... 2 1.3 History and Role of the George Massey Tunnel ...................... 2 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .......................... 5 2.1 Regional Road Network ..................................... 5 2.2 Current Traffic Volumes on Fraser River Crossings .................... 8 2.3 Historic Growth in Traffic Volumes .............................. 12 2.4 Growth in Capacity Across the South Arm ......................... 21 2.5 Physical Constraints on Highway 99 .............................. 22 2.6 Projected Growth in Ferry Traffic ............................... 22 2.7 Role of Transit ........................................... 23 3.0 GROWTH IN TRAVEL DEMAND ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Transportation Plan August 2020
    City of New Westminster Downtown Transportation Plan August 2020 Transportation Division DOC#1632113 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Plan Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Opportunities ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Process ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Plan Structure ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 POLICY CONTEXT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT ................................................................... 8 2.1 Established Policies ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1 Long Term Growth ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2 Recent Direction ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project
    2017 Responses to public comments received during the June 26 – July 26, 2017 Environmental Assessment Public Comment Period on the Valued Components Selection Document June 6, 2018 1 Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project engage.gov.bc.ca/pattullobridge The Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project team would like to thank all of those who participated in, and submitted comments, during the June 26 – July 26, 2017 Environmental Assessment Public Comment Period on the Valued Components Selection document. Contained in this document are the public comments we received, along with our responses. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Meaning EA Environmental Assessment EAO B.C. Environmental Assessment Office GHG Greenhouse Gas IC Intermediate Component Mayors’ Council Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation Mayors’ Vision Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation: A Vision for Metro Vancouver MOTI Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure The Project Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project VC Valued Component VPFA Vancouver Fraser Port Authority 2 Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project engage.gov.bc.ca/pattullobridge COMMENT RESPONSE Associated Update to the VC Selection and Rationale Document 1 "An exit ramp from the bridge to Royal Avenue will be replaced with a signaled intersection." The new bridge will improve safety and reliability for drivers, cyclists and walkers, as N/A well as goods movement. The Project will also improve connections on both sides of I have great concerns about the signaled intersection replacing the exit ramp because it will cause a huge the bridge that will lead to more efficient and safer traffic flow. In New Westminster, back up of traffic in the exit lane on the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Commercial in Confidence PROJECT AGREEMENT Execution SCHEDULE 4 DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION
    PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Commercial in Confidence PROJECT AGREEMENT Execution SCHEDULE 4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application of DBSS ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Reference Documents ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Order of Precedence ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Province Design ............................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................. 2 2.1 Responsibility for Design and Construction .................................................................................... 2 2.2 Design Standards ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Design-Build Contractor Director .................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Long-Span Bridge Design Lead ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Don Bellamy's Rapid Transit Solution (BC Electric Railway Motorman, Retired)
    Don Bellamy’s Rapid Transit Solution (BC Electric Railway Motorman, Retired) “Restore THE POWER OF streetcars NOW” Simple solutions that are based on common sense usually have the greatest impact on society. As is often the case, people with practical experience often have a better understanding of the problem, and can see the most efficient, cost effective solutions first. I spoke with Don Bellamy (former Vancouver City Councilor, Police Officer, and BC Electric Railway Motorman) in July 2008, and his solution is the most efficient and financially viable that I have heard, seen or read about. First let’s get a global perspective. In “The Power of Community – How Cuba Survived Peak Oil” viewers see Americans visiting Cuba in 2006 to learn what Peak Oil really means. When Russia fell in 1991, Cuba lost over 50% of its oil imports from 13-14 million tons down to 4 million tons. While cars produce pollution, buildings and homes consume 40% of world energy and produce 50% of all greenhouse gases. “OIL” Energy is needed for elevators, water supply, heating / cooling, lighting, cooking and food storage, making high rise residential buildings unsustainable. Oil is needed for computers, cosmetics, and plastics. Cubans call the transition to life without Oil the “Special Period”. It took 5 years before the pesticide contaminated soil could be brought back to life with composting. Without the OIL based fertilizers (21,000 tons in 1988 to 1,000 tons in 2006) that produced the 1920’s Green Revolution farm food production increase and oil based pesticides needed to reduce pests associated with mono-agriculture, Cuba had to choose Organic farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilities, Sustainability and Space on Vancouver Streets
    Moving Targets: Mobilities, Sustainability and Space on Vancouver Streets by Peter Marriott M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2011 B.A., University of Alberta, 2008 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Urban Studies in the Urban Studies Program Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Peter Marriott 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2017 Approval Name: Peter Marriott Degree: Master of Urban Studies Title: Moving Targets: Mobilities, Sustainability and Space on Vancouver’s Streets Examining Committee: Chair: Karen Ferguson Professor Urban Studies and History Peter V. Hall Senior Supervisor Professor Urban Studies Meg Holden Supervisor Associate Professor Urban Studies and Geography Mimi Sheller External Examiner Professor Department of Sociology Drexel University Date Defended/Approved: March 27, 2017 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract This project explores the politics of mobility in Vancouver, as expressed through debate over the allocation, configuration and use of street space. Using a mobilities framework to explore the social relationships embodied within these choices about the allocation of physical movement of people within cities, this research consists of two in-depth case studies of commercial streets in Vancouver that have been the subject of recent neighbourhood plans. The project uses multiple qualitative methods, including document analysis, in-depth interviews and contextual observation, to locate a complex and sometimes contradictory discourse around mobility policies in Vancouver. Sustainability targets that rhetorically call for a reduction in automobile use are not realized in the actual interventions made to street space; instead, more symbolic measures are pursued that leave the social relationships of auto-mobility unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Vancouver Cycling
    EDGEMONT BLVD M H BELLEVUE Murdo Fraser E O m INGLEWOOD P E R S JONES C 27 ST TERRACE Park K 22 ST Hastings TE I r N 25 ST MPE Y E K S 21 ST Municipal N Creek FULTON WILLIAM L Point 3 ST O LILLOOET RD L E r A Hall L T Park Atkinson KEITH RD 24 ST I e D PLATEAU 23 ST H iv Mount Seymour ESQUIMALT R 23 ST W Lynn H H F Heywood R U G K IT IR Y Provincial Park E L A R Canyon L K MARINE CLYDE K KEITH Park r N D LLOYD R 23 ST A E M S Klahanie VIEWLYNN Park N T k R PHILIP 21 ST n A N O u I D De TAYLOR WAY TAYLOR S e Park T C 21 ST N R p e C O D o LAHAN K E o K I N D R GALLANT ve E A a GRAVELEY e R U PEMBERTON m O Y LARSON B I LVD RUFUS DR r y V Y M HOPE 20 ST E SE NAUGHTON i 1 C e SECHELT T FELL M WATSON BRID Mahon ST ANDREWS S T Deep G CHESTERFIELD O d Indian Arm PARK ROYAL E M Cove Metro Vancouver Cycling Map - Vancouver-Burnaby-NewBRIDGMAN Westminster Park 17 ST D P GARDEN K Provincial M R BYRON IN Park Wickenden A 16 ST S CLIFFMONT n Park Ambleside r RIN Park S e D E D IN KELLY R P a Park v R 15 ST P I y i City A D s L ROCKCLIFF R O N H a a A A RUFUS Hall N R BANBURY B m N WILLIAM A BEWICKE o Y KH S Indian O Deep JONES n A Capilano Mall MOUNTAIN HWY L A R L D R a a WELCH ST L KEITH RD 13 ST R L l l TLOW D i I River Park Y N E l t p 13 ST O RIVERSIDE DR a P A HA Cove B A V e C T 6 ST M Myrtle E A R L B LLOYD McCartney E O L 2 ST T C 3 ST N H BANFF R w A C MACKAY n T Park A R BROOKSBANK D O Creek d WELCH ST BERKLEY ROAD R P R S G MARINE E n BEAUFORT O e E A PURCELL R N Park K O T S THC W y N E T A E R B E R osp O 1 ST S MONASHEE Parkgate Pr
    [Show full text]
  • President & General Manager 2020 Q3 Report December 2020 Translink
    PRESIDENT & GENERAL MANAGER 2020 Q3 REPORT DECEMBER 2020 TRANSLINK BOARD MEETING This quarter BCRTC continued to deliver its maintenance and rail services despite the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. BCRTC’s Q3 business plan activities and accomplishments reflect the company’s commitment to our employees and customers. We continue to focus on the rail priorities of delivering a Just Culture, inclusive leadership, high performance, and supporting the rail expansion projects contained in the Mayors’ Vision. TransLink Strategic Priority: Implement the Mayors’ Vision Fleet and Infrastructure Phase 2 Mark III status update: In Q3, Mark III testing and commissioning continued at our Burnaby maintenance facility and on our network. All 14 Mark IIIs that make up this phase of the fleet expansion are in BCRTC’s possession, with 10 trains fully commissioned, and the remaining four trains in various stages of revenue service testing. It is anticipated that these remaining trains will be fully commission early in Q4, bringing our total Mark III fleet to 21 trains, which represents 84 cars. Modernize infrastructure to increase capacity and accommodate growth With future network expansion on the horizon and the long-term ridership growth that SkyTrain is likely to experience with it, it remains vital to modernize the system’s infrastructure to ensure resiliency and reliability of the transit service BCRTC provides. • In Q3, the 2020 running rail replacement project work began in the area between 22nd Street to New West Station. The project was able to replace 6,500 rail pads on the inbound track between the two stations. Rail pads are used to fasten, and support running rail to the guideway and help to reduce shock and vibration on the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast False Creek Commercial Development Analysis
    Northeast False Creek Commercial Development Analysis Prepared for The City of Vancouver July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. NOTICE ............................................................4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................5 2.1. RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL..................................................... 6 2.2. HOTEL...................................................................................... 6 2.3. OFFICE ..................................................................................... 6 3. CONTEXT ..........................................................7 3.1. POLICY CONTEXT ......................................................................... 7 4. CASE STUDY REVIEW ............................................ 10 4.1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................................11 4.2. DOCKLANDS, MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA ................................................13 4.3. SOMA & MISSION BAY, SAN FRANCISCO USA..........................................15 4.4. EAST VILLAGE, SAN DIEGO .............................................................18 5. HOTEL ........................................................... 20 5.1. HOTEL MARKET OVERVIEW .............................................................20 5.2. SUPPLY....................................................................................20 5.3. DEMAND...................................................................................22 5.4. HOTEL LOCATION FACTORS ............................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Quayside Historical Context Statement
    New Westminster Neighbourhoods Historical Context Statements Quayside McInnes Street Overpass 1982. (NWPL 1144) McInnes Street Overpass 1982. (NWPL August 2016 Denise Cook Design • Birmingham & Wood • Elana Zysblat Consulting New Westminster: Quayside Neighbourhood Historical Context Statement Historical contexts Introduction Identify and explain the major Neighbourhoods are geographically localized units of identity and themes, factors and processes cohesion within cities, characterized by the provision of basic services that have influenced the history (church, school, park, transportation, shopping) and a sense of community among residents. of a neighbourhood Neighbourhoods emerge, decline, disappear, strengthen, and alter their Their objective is to provide a boundaries depending on a range of factors including the changing framework to investigate, identify character of the municipality of which they are a part, population shifts, and manage heritage resources urban renewal, service availability, and municipal commitment to neighbourhoods’ value. They are not intended to be a detailed account of all aspects of By the turn of the century, New Westminster’s neighbourhoods had the history of a neighbourhood each acquired a distinctive character. Some attributes reflected the history of the city as a whole, while others were specific to the They are not intended to replace neighbourhood. Each neighbourhood has gone through challenging histories designed to serve other times, been revitalized, and today generally possesses an identity and purposes feeling of community among its residents. New Westminster’s neighbourhoods go back in time nearly a century and a half. Their character and physical features, important to understanding their heritage values, have emerged out of this long municipal history. A wider overall context of New Westminster’s neighbourhoods is included here as Appendix A.
    [Show full text]