DOCSLIB.ORG

In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION \9 NOTICE OF MOTION(NO.S2J"OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association. ... Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between NadimMemon ... Petitioner VERSUS Mumbai Cricket Association &Ors ... Respondents. INDEX Date Exh.No. Particulars Page No. Proforma Notice of Motion 1-8 Affidavit in support of Notice of . 9-15 Motion ". , 6/4/2018. A. Copy of order. 16-2~ 2/5/2018 B. News paper report in Times ofIndia 23 2/5/2018 C. Copy of Minutes of Committee of 24 Administrators of Respondent No.1 ~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) .. '" Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between:- Nadim Memon, an adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occupation ;- Business having his address at ) 22, Rustom Sidwa Marg, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 ) ... Petitioner Vis 1) Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) v 2) Wizcraft International Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. ) A company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ) Having its registered office at Satyadev Plaza, ) 5th Floor, Fun Republic Lane, Off. New Link Road, ) Behind Bhagwati House, Andheri(West), ) Mumbai - 400 053 ) 3) India Infoline Ltd (IIFL) a company registered ) Under the companies Act, 1956 having its ) Registered office at IIFL House Sun Infotech Park, ) Road No. 16V, Plot No. B-23, Thane Industrial Area, ) Wagle Estate, Thane - 400604 ) And Corporate office at IIFL Center kamala City, ) Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), ) Mumbai 400013 ) 4) Probability Sports India Pvt. Ltd. ) A company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 ) Having its registered office at IIFL Center Kamala City,) Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), ) Mumbai 400 013 ) 5) Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra Mumbai, ) 3rd Floor, 83, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, ) Mumbai - 400018 ) 6) Board of Control for Cricket in India ) A society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies ) ~ Registration Act having its office at 4th Floor, ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 7) Adv. Ashish Shelar, An adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occ. Advocate, the President of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 8) Vinod Deshpande, An adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occ. unknown, the Vice President of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 9) Pankaj Thakur, An adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occ. unknown, the Vice President of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede StadiUm, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 10) Nitin Dalal, An adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occ. unknown, the Treasurer of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 11) P. V. Shetty, An adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occ. unknown, the Jt. Secretary of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, ) Mumbai - 400 020 ) 12) Prof. Dr. Unmesh Khanvilkar, ) An adult Indian Inhabitant, Occ. unknown, ) the Jt. Secretary ofMumbai Cricket Association, ) having address at Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium,) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 13) Arman Malik, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 14) Mr. Navin Shetty, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 15) Arvind Kadam, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) ~) 16) Deepak PatH, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 17) Pravin Amre, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 18) Shrikant Tigdi; An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 19) Shahalam Shaikh, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 20) Ramesh Vajge, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) '--" Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 21) Ganesh Iyer, An adult Indian Inhabitant, ) Occ. unknown, the Managing Committee member of ) Mumbai Cricket Association, having address at ) Cricket Stadium Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 ) 22) State ofMaharashtra ) Through the Government Pleader ) ... Respondents Let all parties concerned attend before Their Lordship the Hon'ble Justice Shri. S. S. Khemkar and Hon'ble Justice Shri. M. S. Karnik on the day of __ 2018 at 11:00 A. M. or soon thereafter for hearing an application on behalf of the Applicant in the above Petition. The above named Applicant prays:- (a) That the directions of this Hon'ble Court to hold a general Body meeting of the members of the Respondent No.1 Association on or before 15th May 2018 and to complete the entire process including the election to the New Managing Committee by 30tl1 June, 2018 in terms of amended para No.6 of the order dated 6tl1 April, 2018 passed in the above Petition be kept in abeyance till such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. (b) That this Hon'ble Court may direct that the above Petition to be placed on board for appropriate directions on a date after the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India finalises the constitution of Respondent No.6. (c) That pending the hearing and the final disposal of the above Notice of Motion this Hon'ble Court be pleased to keep in abeyance the directions of this Hon'ble Court to hold a general Body meeting of the Respondent No.1 association on or before ISth May 2018 and to complete the entire process including the election to the New Managing Committee by 30th June, 2018 in terms of amended para No.6 of the order dated 6th April, 2018 passed in the above Petition. (d) Interim and ad interim orders in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c) above. Advocate for the Applicant This Notice of Motion is taken out by Warerkar & Warerkar Advocate for the Applicant/Respondent No. I Off at:- 6th floor, Vulcan Insurance Building, Veer Nariman Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 To, 1. Nadim Memon 2. Wizcraft International Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 3. India Infoline Ltd. (IIFL) 4. Probability Sports India Pvt. Ltd. S. Charity Commissioner 6. Board of Control of Cricket in India 7. Adv. Ashish Shelar 8. Vinod Despande 9. Pankaj Thakur '-.:/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORlGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association. .. Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between NadimMemon ... Petitioner VERSUS Mumbai Cricket Association &Ors ... Respondents. Affidavit in support ofthe Notice of Mofion I, Chandrakant S. Naik, Adult of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant, the Chief executive Officer of the Respondent No.1 abovenamed having my office at Wankhede Stadium, "D" Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020, do hereby solemnly'affirm and state as under:- .'" ," 1. I say that I am the Chief Executive officer of Mumbai Cricket Association being the Respondent No.1 abovenamed. I am conversant with the facts of the case and duly authorised by the Committee of administrators comprising of (1) Mr. Justice H. L. Gokhale, former Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Chairman) and Mr. Justice V.M. Kanade, former judge of the Bombay High court (member) appointed by this Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 6th April, 2018 passed in the above 1 --'--_.\\, \....../ petition to file this affidavit. I say that the brief facts relating to filing of this r " notice of Motion are as under: I. 2. I say that vide order dated 6th April, 2018 this Hon'ble Court was pleased to appoint a Committee of Administrators (Hereinafter referred to as "the Committee of Administrators") comprising of (1) Mr. Justice H. L. Gokhale, former Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court ofIndia (Chairman) and Mr. Justice V.M. Kanade, former judge of the Bombay High court (member) for the purpose of ensuring that the Mumbai Cricket Association implements all the directions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bombay High Court
    2007 Bombay High Court 2007 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL S 7142128 S 4111825S 4111825S 1 8 15 22 29 M 1 8152229 M 51219 26 M 51219 26 M 2 9 16 23 30 T 2 9162330 T 6132027 T 6132027 T 3101724 W 3 10 17 24 31 W 7142128 W 7142128W 4111825 T 4 11 18 25 T 1 8 15 22 T 1 8 15 22 29 T 5121926 F 5 12 19 26 F 2916 23 F 2 9 16 23 30 F 6 13 20 27 S 61320 27 S 31017 24 S 3 10 17 24 31 S 7 14 21 28 1. Sundays, Second & Fourth Saturdays and other Holidays are shown in red. MAY 2. The Summer Vacation of the Court will commence on Monday the 7th May, JUNE S 6132027 2007 and the Court will resume its sitting on Monday the 4th June, 2007. S 3101724 3. The court will remain closed on account of October Vacation from 5th M 7142128 November to 18th November, 2007. M 4111825 T 1 8 15 22 29 4. Christmas Vacation from 24th December, 2007 to 6th January, 2008. T 5121926 5. Id-uz-Zuha, Muharram, Milad-un-Nabi, Id-ul-Fitr and Id-uz-Zuha W 2 9 16 23 30 respectively are subject to change depending upon the visibility of the W 6132027 T 3 10 17 24 31 Moon. If the Government of India declares any change in these dates through T 7142128 TV/AIR/Newspaper, the same will be followed. F 4 11 18 25 6.
    [Show full text]
  • IPL 2014 Schedule
    Page: 1/6 IPL 2014 Schedule Mumbai Indians vs Kolkata Knight Riders 1st IPL Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi Apr 16, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Delhi Daredevils vs Royal Challengers Bangalore 2nd IPL Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium, Sharjah Apr 17, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Chennai Super Kings vs Kings XI Punjab 3rd IPL Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi Apr 18, 2014 | 14:30 local | 10:30 GMT Sunrisers Hyderabad vs Rajasthan Royals 4th IPL Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi Apr 18, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Royal Challengers Bangalore vs Mumbai Indians 5th IPL Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai Apr 19, 2014 | 14:30 local | 10:30 GMT Kolkata Knight Riders vs Delhi Daredevils 6th IPL Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai Apr 19, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Rajasthan Royals vs Kings XI Punjab 7th IPL Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium, Sharjah Apr 20, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Chennai Super Kings vs Delhi Daredevils 8th IPL Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi Apr 21, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Kings XI Punjab vs Sunrisers Hyderabad 9th IPL Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium, Sharjah Apr 22, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Rajasthan Royals vs Chennai Super Kings 10th IPL Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai Apr 23, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Royal Challengers Bangalore vs Kolkata Knight Riders Page: 2/6 11th IPL Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium, Sharjah Apr 24, 2014 | 18:30 local | 14:30 GMT Sunrisers Hyderabad vs Delhi Daredevils 12th IPL Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai Apr 25, 2014
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981 Act No
    THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY (EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION TO GOA, DAMAN AND DIU) ACT, 1981 ACT NO. 26 OF 1981 [9th September, 1981.] An Act to provide for the extension of the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu, for the establishment of a permanent bench of that High Court at Panaji and for matters connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Thirty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. Short title and commencement.—(1) This Act may be called the High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981. (2) It shall come into force on such date1 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) “appointed day” means the date on which this Act comes into force; (b) “Court of the Judicial Commissioner” means the Court of the Judicial Commissioner for Goa, Daman and Diu. 3. Extension of jurisdiction of Bombay High Court to Goa, Daman and Diu.—(1) On and from the appointed day, the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay shall extend to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. (2) On and from the appointed day, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner shall cease to function and is hereby abolished: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall prejudice or affect the continued operation of any notice served, injunction issued, direction given or proceedings taken before the appointed day by the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, abolished by this sub-section, under the powers then conferred upon that Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx GP A/W AGK & SSM REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 4466 OF 2020 Board of Control for Cricket in India, a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975 and having its head office at Cricket Centre, Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai 400 020 … Petitioner ~ versus ~ Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and having its registered office at 36, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh … Respondent appearances Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, with FOR THE PETITIONER Samrat Sen, Kanu Agrawal, Indranil “BCCI” Deshmukh, Adarsh Saxena, Ms R Shah and Kartik Prasad, Advocates i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Page 1 of 176 16th June 2021 ::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2021 17:38:08 ::: WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx Mr Haresh Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, with Mr Navroz Seervai, Senior Advocate, FOR THE RESPONDENT Mr Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, “DCHL” Yashpal Jain, Suprabh Jain, Ankit Pandey, Ms Rishika Harish & Ms Bhumika Chulani, Advocates i/b Yashpal Jain CORAM : GS Patel, J JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 12th January 2021 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 16th June 2021 JUDGMENT: OUTLINE OF CONTENTS This judgment is arranged in the following parts. A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 4 B. THE CHALLENGE IN BRIEF; SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS................................................ 6 C. THE AMBIT OF SECTION 34 .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Public Interest Litigation (L) No.33 of 2016
    1/22 PILL/33/2016 BDPPS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.33 OF 2016 Loksatta Movement & Anr. ¼... Petitioners. V/s The State of Maharashtra & Others ¼...Respondents. --- Mr. D. H. Mehta, Senior Counsel, with Mr. Arshil Shah, Ms. Ankita Verma, Dhaval Mehta, a/w Rima Paradkar i/b D. M. Legal Associates, for the Petitioners. Mr. Rohit Deo, Acting Advocate General, a/w Ms. Geeta Shastri, Addl. G.P., Mr. A.B. Vagyani, GP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. S. Pakale a/w Trupti Puranik, for the Respondent ± BMC. Mr. S. B. Pawar a/w Swati Sawant, Nikita Jacob i/b S. K. Legal Associates, for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Abhijeet Kulkarni for Respondent No.5. Mr. Rafique Dada, Sr. Counsel a/w Indranil Deshmukh, Ms. Ayesha Talpade i/b M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Respondent No. 6 (BCCI). Mr. Rafique Dada, Sr. Counsel a/w A. S. Khandeparkar, V. V. Warerkar i/b Warerkar & Warerkar, for Respondent No. 7. Mr. Vineet Naik, Sr. Counsel a/w Sukand Kulkarni, for Respondent No. 8. BombayMr. Vedchetan Patil, for Intervenor High ± Gournet Renaisance Court Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Milind Sathe, Sr. Counsel a/w Firdosh Pooniwala, Ms. M. D© Souza i/b A. S. Dayal & Associates, for Intervenor / Applicant (India Wins Sports Pvt. Ltd.). Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Counsel with Mr. Nimay Dave with Mr. Yogendra Singh i/b Ans Legal for New Rising Promoter Pvt. Ltd. [Rising Pune Supergiants) ::: Uploaded on - 15/04/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2016 19:34:44 ::: 2/22 PILL/33/2016 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: Journal.Lawmantra.Co.In E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected]
    LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: journal.lawmantra.co.in E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] INGRESSION OF WOMEN IN PLACES OF WORSHIP AN EQUALITY DIMENSION Abstract:- The bans such as women’s entry into temples involve notions and norms which directly clash with ideas of modernity and are also incompatible with rights enshrined in the Constitution. In a secular country like India, which promises to protect the rights of its citizens to practice religion and faith of his or her choice, rulings such as banning menstruating women to enter places of worship by priests are a violation of their rights. Women’s groups and organizations have come forward and challenged this whole notion of “purity-impurity” and are protesting against this unjust ruling by the temple heads in the name of god, religion, culture and practices. It seems that there is an increasing interest and inclination towards religion, and worship of gods and goddesses in recent years. This paper brings to limelight the violative provisions of law as a result of this unjust practice. Further, the paper will contrast certain cases with judicial responses on the related issues. Introduction: Human Rights these days is the most commonly debated topic, be it nationally or internationally. Those are rights that an individual possesses by virtue of being human and when the term human is used it should include both men as well as women, because it has become immensely important to understand that women also have these human rights because gender equality is there in the very core concept of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Stadiums in India & World
    Is Now In CHENNAI | MADURAI | TRICHY | SALEM | COIMBATORE | CHANDIGARH | BANGALORE|NAMAKKAL|ERODE|PUDUCHERRY www.raceinstitute.in | www.bankersdaily.in IMPORTANT STADIUMS IN INDIA & WORLD Chennai: #1, South Usman Road, T Nagar. | Madurai: #24/21, Near Mapillai Vinayagar Theatre, Kalavasal. | Trichy: opp BSNL office, Juman Center, 43 Promenade Road, Cantonment. | Salem: #209, Sonia Plaza / Muthu Complex, Junction Main Rd, State Bank Colony, Salem. | Coimbatore #545, 1st floor, Adjacent to SBI (DB Road Branch), Diwan Bahadur Road, RS Puram, Coimbatore (Kovai) – 641002 | Chandigarh: SCO 131-132 Sector 17C. | Bangalore. H.O: 7601808080 / 9043303030 | www.raceinstitute.in Important Stadiums in India: 1. Wankhede Stadium Mumbai, Maharashtra Cricket 2. Feroz Shah Kotla Ground Delhi Cricket 3. M.A. Chidambaram Stadium Chennai , Tamil Nadu Cricket 4. Eden Gardens Kolkata, West Bengal Cricket 5. Gymkhana Ground Mumbai , Maharashtra Cricket 6. Jsca Stadium Ranchi, Jharkhand Cricket 7. Subrata Roy Sahara Stadium Pune , Maharashtra Cricket 8. Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium Hyderabad, Telangana Cricket 9. Barkatullah Khan Stadium Jodhpur, Rajasthan Cricket 10. Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium Kochi, Kerala Multipurpose ( football (soccer) and cricket) 11. K.D. Singh Babu Stadium Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh Multipurpose 12. Fatorda Stadium Margao, Goa Football & Cricket 13. Maulana Azad Stadium Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir Cricket 14. Indira Priyadarshini Stadium Visakhapatnam, Andhra Cricket Pradesh 15. University Stadium Thiruvananthapuram, Multi-purpose Kerala 16. Roop Singh Stadium Gwalior , Madhya Pradesh Cricket 17. Nehru Stadium Pune, Maharashtra Multipurpose 18. Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium Delhi Multipurpose 19. Keenan Stadium Jamshedpur , Jharkhand Multipurpose 20. Sardar Patel Stadium Ahmedabad , Gujarat Cricket 21. Moti Bagh Stadium Vadodara , Gujarat Cricket 22. Sher-I-Kashmir Stadium Srinagar, Jammu & Cricket Kashmir 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Sir, This Is with Reference to Our
    From: Mumbai Cricket Association [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 October 2018 11:42 To: 'Committee of Administrators' Cc: 'Rahul Johri' Subject: RE: Confirmation to host ODI match of the West Indies Series 2018 Dear Sir, This is with reference to our trailing email regarding hosting of the 4th One Day International match between India and West Indies on 29th October 2018 at Wankhede Stadium. We have not received any communication from your end in this regard. We are surprised to learn from the media reports that the said match has been shifted to Brabourne Stadium, Mumbai. We would request you to kindly let us know the reasons for shifting of the said match. Regards, (C.S.Naik) C.E.O. From: Mumbai Cricket Association [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 11 October 2018 18:33 To: 'Committee of Administrators' Cc: 'Rahul Johri' Subject: RE: Confirmation to host ODI match of the West Indies Series 2018 Dear Sir, Let me take this opportunity to reiterate that Mumbai Cricket Association is fully committed to hosting the 4th One Day International match between India and West Indies on 29th October 2018 at Wankhede Stadium. Accordingly, all the requirements to hold the match are in place. As communicated to Mr. Rahul Johri, CEO, BCCI in 2 meetings, we face a precarious situation. At present the Association does not have any authorised signatory and hence nobody is in a position to take decisions pertaining to appointment of various agencies, finalising the ticket prices and signing of agreement with BCCI. We discussed various options to conduct the match, including asking the BCCI to conduct it with our committed support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Premier League (IPL) Is a Professional Twenty20 Cricket League in India
    IPL Teams: The Indian Premier League (IPL) is a professional Twenty20 cricket league in India. It is governed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), headquartered in Mumbai, and supervised by BCCI Vice President Ranjib Biswal, who serves as the league's Chairman and Commissioner. IPL is currently contested by eight teams, consisting of players from around the world. The following is a list of current IPL team rosters. Club name, Captain(C), Head Coach(HC), Owner(s) City Home Ground(HG) MS Dhoni(C),Stephen Fleming(HC) Chennai Super Kings, Varun Manian (India Cements) M. A. Chidambaram Stadium,(HG) Chennai Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Delhi Daredevils, JP Duminy(C),Gary Kirsten(HC), Grandhi Mallikarjuna Rao (GMR) New Delhi Feroz Shah Kotla,New Delhi, Delhi(HG) Preity Zinta (PZNZ Media), George Bailey(C),Sanjay Bangar(HC), Kings XI Punjab, Ness Wadia (Bombay Dyeing), 1)PCA Stadium,Mohali, Punjab Mohali Mohit Burman (Dabur), The Oberoi Group 2)HPCA Stadium,Dharamsala, Himachal Pradesh Kolkata Knight Shahrukh Khan (Red Chillies Gautam Gambhir(C),Trevor Bayliss(HC), Riders, Entertainment), Eden Gardens,Kolkata, West Bengal Kolkata Juhi Chawla, Jay Mehta (Mehta Group) Rohit Sharma(C),Ricky Ponting(HC), Mumbai Indians, 1)Wankhede Stadium,Mumbai, Maharashtra Mukesh Ambani (Reliance Group) Mumbai 2)Brabourne Stadium,Mumbai, Maharashtra 3)DY Patil Stadium,Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra Lachlan Murdoch (Emerging Media) Shane Watson(C),Paddy Upton(HC), Rajasthan Royals, Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra (UK Tradecorp 1)Sawai Mansingh Stadium,Jaipur, Rajasthan Jaipur Ltd) 2)Sardar Patel Stadium,Ahmedabad, Gujarat Royal Challengers Virat Kohli(C),Daniel Vettori(HC), Bangalore, Vijay Mallya (UB Group) M.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Notice of Motion No
    211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC SHEPHALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2144 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2130 OF 2010 1. PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its office at Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 4"" "#1 2. HARDCASTLE & WAUD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., A company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1913 having its office at Brabourne Stadium, Gate No. 10, 1st *+oor, 8-, Veer Nariman Road, Mumbai !"" 0#" And also at/ 190!, G$DC, 'arigam (.a+sad District2, (u3arat ...P !"#$"%%& Versus 1. VILAS NEMICHAND JAIN, trading as Ne4 Era Adhesive Industries, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – !#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon 1MS2 2. M'S. NEW ERA, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – Bombay!#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon High 1MS2 A9'O A; Court Post Sa6+i, ;a+u6a Ya4a+, 7a+gaon, Maharashtra – 4#5 3"#) ...D(%(#)!#$& 1 *% 2+ ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2015 10:40:45 ::: 211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC APPEARANCES FOR THE PLAINTIFFS D,. V. V. T- .!/-,0!,1 Se#"*, A)2*3!$(, with Mr. Sandip Parikh, Mr. Ashish Kamat, Mr. Rahul Duote, Mr. Minesh Andharia & Mr. Hemant Thadani, i/ Krishna & Saurastri Asso!iates. FOR THE DEFENDANTS D,. B. Sa,!%, with Mr. Vinod "ha#at, Mr. Dhiren Karania & Mr. Punit $ain, i/ %.S. He#de & V. "ha#at, &or De&endants 'os. 1 and ). CORAM 4 G. S. P!$( 1 J. JUDGMENT RESERVED ON 4 4$h Sept(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON 4 9$h S(/$(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers
    Working Papers www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MMG Working Paper 13-04 ● ISSN 2192-2357 SUMEET MHASKAR Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai Religious and Ethnic Diversity und multiethnischer Gesellschaften Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser Sumeet Mhaskar Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai MMG Working Paper 13-04 Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen © 2013 by the author ISSN 2192-2357 (MMG Working Papers Print) Working Papers are the work of staff members as well as visitors to the Institute’s events. The analyses and opinions presented in the papers do not reflect those of the Institute but are those of the author alone. Download: www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MPI zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen Hermann-Föge-Weg 11, 37073 Göttingen, Germany Tel.: +49 (551) 4956 - 0 Fax: +49 (551) 4956 - 170 www.mmg.mpg.de [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the effects of socio-political processes on economic preferences in Mumbai by focussing on the case of Muslim ex-millworkers. The argument of this paper is that the feeling of karahiyat [Urdu: nausea, disgust, hate, etc.] com- bined with suspicion, in terms of terrorism and mafia, creates barriers for Muslims’ employment and self-employment opportunities. The argument is substantiated by using the survey data of 924 ex-millworkers and in-depth interviews with 80 ex-mill- workers collected during 2008-09 and 2010-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion and the Indian Supreme Court: The
    FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT: THE RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION AND ESSENTIAL PRACTICES TESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGION MAY 2019 By Coleman D. Williams Thesis Committee: Ramdas Lamb, Chairperson Helen Baroni Ned Bertz Abstract As a religiously diverse society and self-proclaimed secular state, India is an ideal setting to explore the complex and often controversial intersections between religion and law. The religious freedom clauses of the Indian Constitution allow for the state to regulate and restrict certain activities associated with religious practice. By interpreting the constitutional provisions for religious freedom, the judiciary plays an important role in determining the extent to which the state can lawfully regulate religious affairs. This thesis seeks to historicize the related development of two jurisprudential tests employed by the Supreme Court of India: the religious denomination test and the essential practices test. The religious denomination test gives the Court the authority to determine which groups constitute religious denominations, and therefore, qualify for legal protection. The essential practices test limits the constitutional protection of religious practices to those that are deemed ‘essential’ to the respective faith. From their origins in the 1950s up to their application in contemporary cases on religious freedom, these two tests have served to limit the scope of legal protection under the Constitution and legitimize the interventionist tendencies of the Indian state. Additionally, this thesis will discuss the principles behind the operation of the two tests, their most prominent criticisms, and the potential implications of the Court’s approach.
    [Show full text]