DOCSLIB.ORG

Exotic and Non-Exotic Baryon Properties on the Light Cone Cédric

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exotic and Non-Exotic Baryon Properties on the Light Cone Cédric Academic year 2007-2008 University of Li`ege Faculty of Sciences AGO Department IFPA Exotic and Non-Exotic Baryon Properties on the Light Cone C¶edricLorc¶e E-mail: [email protected] Supervisor: Maxim Polyakov Thesis presented in ful¯llment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science Acknowledgment First I would like to warmly thank my supervisor M. Polyakov for accepting me as a Ph.D. student, for his faith in me and especially for his kindness. It was a genuine pleasure to work and discuss with him. Thanks to him I have learned a lot on physics and the scienti¯c world and met many very interesting people. Next I would like to express my gratitude towards J. Cugnon for his help, advice and support in all the necessary steps linked to the present thesis. I am especially grateful to K. Goeke and M. Hacke for the two years passed in Ruhr UniversitÄatBochum (Germany) where the biggest part of the present thesis has been achieved. I will forever remember the welcoming people of Theoretische Physik II group. I have particularly appreciated everyday K. Goeke's good humour. He was always whistling, laughing or in raptures about other physicists' research. Living in Germany was a unique and extraordinary experience for me. That is the reason why I address this sentence to all people met there: Ich danke euch fÄuralles. I would also like to thank D. Diakonov for his help, patience and disponibility. Beside being a great physicist he is also a man full of humanity. The other part of the present thesis has been achieved in Li`egeUniversity. I am thankful to members of the IFPA group. I am in fact also indebted to all my teachers and professors for the share of their knowledge and passion. A thesis work does not only consist of passing all the days in front of a computer, papers or drafts. Discussions about physics, pataphysics and metaphysics are also essential to proceed. So I am thankful for all the entertaining, pleasant, interesting, serious and less serious moments passed with friends and other people met. I cannot of course cite all of them: Alice D., Aline D., Christophe B., Daniel H., Danielle R., Delphine D., Denis F., Fr¶ed¶ericK., Geo®rey M., Ghil-Soek Y., Gr¶egoryA., Jacqueline M., Jean-Paul M., J¶er¶emieG., Kirill S., Lionel H., Luc L., Michel W., Nina G., Pauline M., Quentin J., Renaud V., Sophie P., St¶ephaneT., Thibaut M., Tim L., Virginie C., Virgine D., Xavier C. and many others. Finally I would like to express my gratitude to my family: my mother, my sister and my father for their love, presence, help and for giving me the possibility to reach my dreams. I have also special thanks for Pierrot Di Marco and his two sons Christophe and S¶ebastien. Thanks for all what they did for us. I am really happy and proud to consider them as genuine part of our family. Contents 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Hadron structure and QCD . 9 1.2 Models and degrees of freedom . 10 1.2.1 Constituent quark models . 10 1.2.2 Quark-antiquark pairs and the nucleon sea . 11 1.2.3 Chiral symmetry of QCD . 11 1.2.4 Importance of pions in models . 12 1.3 Baryon properties and experimental surprises . 13 1.3.1 Proton spin crisis . 14 1.3.2 Strangeness in nucleon and Dirac sea . 15 1.3.3 Shape of baryons . 16 1.3.4 Exotic baryons . 16 1.4 Motivations and Plan of the thesis . 18 2 Light-cone approach 21 2.1 Forms of dynamics . 21 2.2 Advantages of the light-cone approach . 22 2.3 Light cone v.s. In¯nite Momentum Frame . 25 2.4 Standard model approach based on Melosh rotation . 26 3 The Chiral Quark-Soliton Model 29 3.1 Introduction . 29 3.1.1 The e®ective action of ÂQSM . 29 3.2 Explicit baryon wave function . 30 3.3 Baryon rotational³ wave functions´ . 33 3.3.1 The octet 8; 1 + .................................... 33 ³2 ´ 3.3.2 The decuplet 10; 3 + .................................. 34 ³2 ´ 1 + 3.3.3 The antidecuplet 10; 2 ............................... 34 3.4 Formulation in the In¯nite Momentum Frame . 35 3.4.1 QQ¹ pair wave function . 35 3.4.2 Discrete-level wave function . 36 3.5 Baryon Fock components . 37 3.5.1 3Q component of baryons . 38 3.5.2 5Q component of baryons . 39 3.5.3 7Q component of baryons . 40 5 6 CONTENTS 3.5.4 nQ component of baryons . 40 3.6 Matrix elements, normalization and charges . 41 3.6.1 3Q contribution . 41 3.6.2 5Q contributions . 42 3.6.3 7Q contributions . 44 3.7 Scalar overlap integrals . 46 3.7.1 3Q scalar integrals . 46 3.7.2 5Q direct scalar integrals . 46 3.7.3 5Q exchange scalar integrals . 47 3.7.4 7Q scalar integrals . 48 4 Symmetry relations and parametrization 51 4.1 General flavor SU(3) symmetry relations . 51 4.2 Flavor SU(3) symmetry and magnetic moments . 53 4.2.1 Charge and U-spin . 53 4.2.2 More about SU(3) octet magnetic moments . 54 4.2.3 More about SU(3) decuplet and antidecuplet magnetic moments . 55 4.2.4 More about SU(3) transition magnetic moments . 55 4.3 Speci¯c SU(6) symmetry relations . 57 5 Vector charges and normalization 59 5.1 Introduction . 59 5.2 Vector charges on the light cone . 60 5.3 Scalar overlap integrals and quark distributions . 61 5.3.1 3Q scalar integral . 62 5.3.2 5Q scalar integrals . 62 5.3.3 7Q scalar integrals . 63 5.4 Combinatoric results . 63 5.4.1 Octet baryons . 63 5.4.2 Decuplet baryons . 65 5.4.3 Antidecuplet baryons . 66 5.5 Numerical results and discussion . 67 5.5.1 Octet content . 68 5.5.2 Decuplet content . 69 5.5.3 Antidecuplet content . 70 6 Axial charges 71 6.1 Introduction . 71 6.2 Axial charges on the light cone . 72 6.3 Scalar overlap integrals and quark distributions . 73 6.3.1 3Q scalar integral . 74 6.3.2 5Q scalar integrals . 74 6.3.3 7Q scalar integrals . 75 6.4 Combinatoric Results . 75 6.4.1 Octet baryons . 75 6.4.2 Decuplet baryons . 76 6.4.3 Antidecuplet baryons . 77 CONTENTS 7 6.5 Numerical results and discussion . 78 6.5.1 Octet content . 78 6.5.2 Decuplet content . 80 6.5.3 Antidecuplet content . 81 6.6 Pentaquark width . 83 7 Tensor charges 85 7.1 Introduction . 85 7.2 Tensor charges on the light cone . 86 7.3 Scalar overlap integrals and quark distributions . 87 7.3.1 3Q scalar integral . 88 7.3.2 5Q scalar integrals . 88 7.4 Combinatoric Results . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qt7r7253zd.Pdf
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title RELATIVISTIC QUARK MODEL BASED ON THE VENEZIANO REPRESENTATION. II. GENERAL TRAJECTORIES Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7r7253zd Author Mandelstam, Stanley. Publication Date 1969-09-02 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Submitted to Physical Review UCRL- 19327 Preprint 7. z RELATIVISTIC QUARK MODEL BASED ON THE VENEZIANO REPRESENTATION. II. GENERAL TRAJECTORIES RECEIVED LAWRENCE RADIATION LABORATORY Stanley Mandeistam SEP25 1969 September 2, 1969 LIBRARY AND DOCUMENTS SECTiON AEC Contract No. W7405-eng-48 TWO-WEEK LOAN COPY 4 This is a Library Circulating Copy whIch may be borrowed for two weeks. for a personal retention copy, call Tech. Info. Dlvislon, Ext. 5545 I C.) LAWRENCE RADIATION LABORATOR SLJ-LJ UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA BERKELET DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon (Pentaquark)
    PentaquarksPentaquarks inin ChiralChiral SolitonSoliton ModelsModels Bo-Qiang Ma ? Department of Physics, Peking University Feb.17-19, 2004, talk on Feb.18 at Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto Univ. In Collaboration with B. Wu Hep-ph/0312041, PRD Hep-ph/0312326, PLB Hep-ph/0311331 1 Search for Exotic Baryon States • Standard Quark Model – classifies hadrons as • mesons ( qq ) • baryons ( qqq ) – also allows “non-standard” or exotic hadron states • multiquark mesons ( qqqq ) • multiquark baryons ( qqqqq ) -> appear as baryon resonances • hybrid states ( qqg or q qqg ) • dibaryons ( qqqqqq ) • glueballs -> no convincing previous evidence for exotic baryon states. 2 Baryon States •All baryons observed before – classified as singlets, octets and decuplets of SU(3) flavor group -> constructed of 3 quarks only, - may have higher orbital angular momentum, resonances – have strangeness from S=-3 to S=0 Y baryon octet with JP=½+ 0 I Z baryon decuplet with JP=(3/2)+ • Exotic Baryons with S=+1 – cannot be formed from only 3 quarks – belong to higher SU(3) multiplet 3 Previous Searches for Exotic Baryons • Ideally: kaon-nucleon (KN) scattering R. Cool et al., PRL 17, 102 (1966) • started in 1966 at BNL BNL 1966 -> “clear” resonance peak found in K+p at M=1.91 GeV and Γ=180 MeV • searches: partial wave analyses in KN scattering – candidates: isoscalar Z0(1780) and Z0(1865) -> give poor evidence (PDG) • dropped from PDG listings after 1986 • reasons for failure: – KN (in)elastic scattering at p(K) corresponding to 1.74 ≤ MZ ≤ 2.16 GeV – resonance widths large: 70 ≤ ΓZ ≤ 845 MeV – MIT bag model predictions: MZ ≥ 1.7 GeV • Λ(1405): molecular meson-baryon state uudsu ? – interpretation problematic: could be uds -> ambiguity remains 4 PentaquarkPentaquark StatesStates • Predictions of pentaquark states with both strange and charm (by Lipkin et al.), no evidence found in experimental searches for more than ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Standard and Exotic Matter Through a $ Z 2 $ Symmetry
    Unification of standard and exotic matter through a Z2 symmetry Ernesto A. Matute∗ Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Casilla 307, Santiago 2, Chile We consider a scenario in which the discrete weak symmetry between quarks and leptons is extended to the weak force by introducing exotic partners. We conjecture that there exists a hidden discrete symmetry P,˜ defining a Z2 group, between standard and exotic quarks and leptons. The × × × × × ˜ unified model SU(3)q SU(3)q˜ SU(2)qℓ˜ SU(2)qℓ˜ U(1)Y P is discussed, where the unifying discrete symmetry extends over particles and forces. It is shown that the lighter neutral and charged weak bosons generated upon spontaneous symmetry breaking have the same properties as those of the standard model. Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity is used to set a mass of order 2.8 TeV for the nonstandard weak bosons, which do not exhibit quark-lepton universality. A grand unified × × ˜ theory of (GUT)qℓ˜ (GUT)qℓ˜ P type, with decay of exotic matter into standard matter and no decay of the ordinary nucleon, is put forward. PACS numbers: 12.60.Cn; 11.30.Hv; 12.10.Dm; 14.70.Pw The unification of quark and lepton properties under unified form G ˜ Gqℓ P,˜ whereq ˜ and ℓ˜ denote exotic qℓ × ˜ × strong and electroweak interactions through a continu- quarks and exotic leptons, respectively, and P,˜ hereafter ous or discrete symmetry has been one of the targets referred to as exotic symmetry, denotes the discrete sym- of research efforts over the last few decades [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Quark Masses, Hyperfine Interactions, and Exotic Baryons
    Quark masses, hyperfine interaction and exotic baryonsa Marek Karliner ([email protected]) Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, United Kingdom and School of Physics and Astronomy,Tel Aviv University, Israel In collaboration with Harry J. Lipkin ahep-ph/0307243 and hep-ph/0307343 Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 1 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 2 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: • two new extremely narrow mesons containing c and s¯ quarks (BaBar, CLEO, BELLE) Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 3 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: • two new extremely narrow mesons containing c and s¯ quarks (BaBar, CLEO, BELLE) • new very narrow resonance precisely at D0∗D0 threshold (Belle, CDF) Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 4 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: • two new extremely narrow mesons containing c and s¯ quarks (BaBar, CLEO, BELLE) • new very narrow resonance precisely at D0∗D0 threshold (Belle, CDF) • enhancements near pp¯ thresholds (BES, BELLE) Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 5 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: • two new extremely narrow mesons containing c and s¯ quarks (BaBar, CLEO, BELLE) • new very narrow resonance precisely at D0∗D0 threshold (Belle, CDF) • enhancements near pp¯ thresholds (BES, BELLE) • exotic 5-quark KN resonances: Θ+, Ξ∗−− Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov. 7, 2003 6 Renaissance of QCD Spectroscopy Several new surprising experimental results: • two new extremely narrow mesons containing c and s¯ quarks (BaBar, CLEO, BELLE) • new very narrow resonance precisely at D0∗D0 threshold (Belle, CDF) • enhancements near pp¯ thresholds (BES, BELLE) • exotic 5-quark KN resonances: Θ+, Ξ∗−− Marek Karliner – Pentaquark Workshop, Jlab, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotics with Heavy Quarks
    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP2018) Downloaded from journals.jps.jp by Deutsches Elek Synchrotron on 11/15/19 Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP2018) JPS Conf. Proc. 26, 011005 (2019) https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.26.011005 Exotics with Heavy Quarks Marek Karliner School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Israel E-mail: [email protected] (Received May 27, 2019) I discuss recent developments regarding new types of hadrons involving heavy quarks: hadronic molecules, doubly heavy baryons, stable tetraquarks and others. I also explain how the discovery of the doubly heavy baryon leads to a quark-level analogue of nuclear fusion, with energy release per reaction an order of magnitude greater than in ordinary fusion. KEYWORDS: QCD,exotic hadrons,heavy quarks,hadronic molecules,tetraquarks,pentaquarks 1. Social Life of Heavy Quarks Studying heavy exotic hadrons is somewhat similar to investigating the social life of heavy quarks. The relevant questions one would be asking in this context are (a) Who with whom? (b) For how long? (c) A short episode? or (d) “Till Death Us Do Part”? In the following I will try to an- swer some of the obvious concrete questions about exotic hadrons: Do they exist? If they do, which ones? What is their internal structure? How best to look for them? Quarks are fundamental building blocks of protons, neutrons and all hadrons. Paraphrasing Orwell [1], one can say that all quarks are equal, but heavy quarks are more equal than others. In recent years a lot of attention has been devoted to new combinations of hadrons containing heavy quarks, including exotics [2,3]: • hadronic molecules, Zb, Zc tetraquark-like states, and more recently the LHCb pentaquark • prediction and discovery of doubly-charmed baryon • a stable bbu¯d¯ tetraquark Hadrons with heavy quarks are much simpler than quarks containing only light quarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryogenesis from B Meson Oscillations
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 100, 075002 (2019) Baryogenesis from B meson oscillations † Ann E. Nelson * and Huangyu Xiao Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1560, USA (Received 17 June 2019; published 1 October 2019) We show how CP violating B meson oscillations in conjunction with baryon number violating decays can generate the cosmological asymmetry between matter and antimatter, and explore the parameter space of a simple, self-contained model, which can be tested via exotic B meson decays, and via the charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays of neutral B mesons. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.075002 I. INTRODUCTION visible matter-anti-matter asymmetry and asymmetric dark matter [6] via B-meson decays. In the present Baryogenesis—generating the cosmological asymme- work, we reexamine the simpler model of Ref. [4],and try between matter and antimatter—requires physics show that for a different parameter range that was not beyond the Standard Model (SM). The pioneering work considered in the previous work, baryon number vio- of Sakharov [1] found three necessary conditions: baryon B0 number violation, C and CP violation, and departure lating decays of mesons are allowed by experiment, from thermal equilibrium. Baryon number violation potentially observable, and could be the explanation for occurs nonperturbatively in the Standard Model [2]. baryogenesis. The baryogenesis scenario described here begins in the CP violation also occurs, however the standard model prenucleosynthesis early universe with the decays of CP violation appears to be too small to explain the a long lived scalar into b-quarks and antiquarks. These observed baryon asymmetry. Finally, the minimal decays are assumed to take place late enough and at Standard Model contains no mechanism for departure low enough temperature to allow hadronization, but from thermal equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • GLUEBALLS, HYBRIDS, PENTAQUARKS: Introduction to Hadron Spectroscopy and Review of Selected Topics
    GLUEBALLS, HYBRIDS, PENTAQUARKS: Introduction to Hadron Spectroscopy and Review of Selected Topics Eberhard Klempt Helmholtz–Institut f¨urStrahlen- und Kernphysik der Universit¨atBonn Nußallee 14 -16, 53115 Bonn, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Hadron spectroscopy has received revitalised interest due to the discovery of states with unexpected properties. The BABAR collaboration found a DsJ(2317) (likely scalar) me- son, accompanied by a second state, the DsJ(2463) with preferred spin J = 1, discovered at CLEO. Both are found at an unexpectedly low mass and are narrow. A further nar- row resonance, discovered at BELLE in its decay into ¼¼J/Ã, might be a DD¤ molecule or a cc¯ meson in which the color field, concentrated in a flux tube, is excited. A qq¯ state with excited gluon field is called hybrid, such excitations are expected from QCD. The mass of the state at the DD¤ threshold underlines the importance of meson–meson interactions or four–quark dynamics at the opening of new thresholds. BES reports a signal in radiative J/Ã decays into a proton and an antiproton which has the proper- ties as predicted for NN¯ quasi-nuclear bound states. And last not least the Θ+(1540), seen in several experiments, shows that the ’naive’ quark model needs to be extended. There is also considerable progress in understanding the dynamics of quarks in more conventional situations even though the view presented here is not uncontested. In me- son and in baryon spectroscopy, evidence is emerging that one–gluon–exchange does not provide the appropiate means to understand low–energy QCD; instanton–induced inter- actions yield much more insight.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wimpy Baryogenesis Miracle
    A WIMPy baryogenesis miracle The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Cui, Yanou, Lisa Randall, and Brian Shuve. 2012. “A WIMPy Baryogenesis Miracle.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2012 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep04(2012)075. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41412181 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP A WIMPy Baryogenesis Miracle Yanou Cui,a,b1 Lisa Randalla2 and Brian Shuvea3 a Center for the Fundamental Laws of Nature Jefferson Physical Laboratory Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. b Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Abstract We explore models in which weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter annihilation is directly responsible for baryogenesis, thereby connecting dark matter with baryogenesis. We call this process “WIMPy baryogenesis”. The dark matter relic density in these models, as with conventional WIMP models, is obtained with only order one couplings and TeV-scale masses according to the WIMP miracle. Thus, WIMPy baryogenesis models naturally accommodate weak-scale dark matter. Furthermore, an extension of the WIMP miracle simultaneously explains the observed baryon asymmetry and the correct dark matter abundance. The models we present have the further feature that they create the baryon number asymmetry at the weak scale, thereby avoiding the problems in some models of baryogenesis associated with high reheat temperatures in supersymmetric theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1510.04298V1 [Hep-Ph] 14 Oct 2015
    October 2, 2018 0:34 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE review_WIMPbg Modern Physics Letters A c World Scientific Publishing Company A REVIEW OF WIMP BARYOGENESIS MECHANISMS YANOU CUI Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. North, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] It was recently proposed that weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP) may provide new ways of generating the observed baryon asymmetry in the early universe, as well as addressing the cosmic coincidence between dark matter and baryon abundances. This suggests a new possible connection between weak scale new particle physics and modern cosmology. This review summarizes the general ideas and simple model examples of the two recently proposed WIMP baryogenesis mechanisms: baryogenesis from WIMP dark matter annihilation during thermal freezeout, and baryogenesis from metastable WIMP decay after thermal freezeout. This letter also discusses the interesting phenomenology of these models, in particular the experimental signals that can be probed in the intensity frontier experiments and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiments. Keywords: Baryogenesis; WIMP; dark matter. PACS Nos.: 95.30Cq, 95.35+d, 98.80Cq 1. Introduction Over the past two decades, we have seen the beginning and rapid development of the new era of precision cosmology. The combinations of a variety of experiments have provided us unprecedented knowledge about energy
    [Show full text]
  • Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Arxiv:1706.00610V2
    DESY 17-071 Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Ahmed Ali,1 Jens S¨orenLange,2 and Sheldon Stone3 1DESY Theory Group, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany 2Justus-Liebig-Universit¨atGiessen, II. Physikalisches Institut, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16, D-35392 Giessen, Germany 3Physics Department, 201 Physics Building, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130, USA July 31, 2017 Abstract For many decades after the invention of the quark model in 1964 there was no evidence that hadrons are formed from anything other than the simplest pairings of quarks and antiquarks, mesons being formed of a quark-antiquark pair and baryons from three quarks. In the last decade, however, in an explosion of data from both e+e− and hadron colliders, there are many recently observed states that do not fit into this picture. These new particles are called generically \ex- otics". They can be either mesons or baryons. Remarkably, they all decay into at least one meson formed of either a cc or bb pair. In this review, after the introduction, we explore each of these new discoveries in detail first from an experimental point of view, then subsequently give a theo- retical discussion. These exotics can be explained if the new mesons contain two-quarks and two- antiquarks (tetraquarks), while the baryons contain four-quarks plus an antiquark (pentaquarks). The theoretical explanations for these states take three divergent tracks: tightly bound objects, just as in the case of normal hadrons, but with more constituents, or loosely bound \molecules" similar to the deuteron, but formed from two mesons, or a meson or baryon, or more wistfully, they are not multiquark states but appear due to kinematic effects caused by different rescatterings of virtual particles; most of these models have all been post-dictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Stability in Grand Unified Theories, in Strings and in Branes
    Physics Reports 441 (2007) 191–317 www.elsevier.com/locate/physrep Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes Pran Natha,∗, Pavel Fileviez Pérezb aDepartment of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA bDepartamento de Física, Centro de Física Teórica de Partículas, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Lisboa, Portugal Accepted 12 February 2007 Available online 7 March 2007 editor: J.A. Bagger Abstract A broad overview of the current status of proton stability in unified models of particle interactions is given which includes non-supersymmetric unification, SUSY and SUGRA unified models, unification based on extra dimensions, and string-M-theory models. The extra dimensional unification includes 5D and 6D and universal extra dimensional (UED) models, and models based on warped geometry. Proton stability in a wide array of string theory and M theory models is reviewed. These include Calabi–Yau models, grand unified models with Kac–Moody levels k>1, a new class of heterotic string models, models based on intersecting D branes, and string landscape models. The destabilizing effect of quantum gravity on the proton is discussed. The possibility of testing grand unified models, models based on extra dimensions and string-M-theory models via their distinctive modes is investigated. The proposed next generation proton decay experiments, HyperK, UNO, MEMPHYS, ICARUS, LANNDD (DUSEL), and LENA would shed significant light on the nature of unification complementary to the physics at the LHC. Mathematical tools for the computation of proton lifetime are given in the appendices. Prospects for the future are discussed. © 2007 Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarks in Hadrons
    Quarks in Hadrons Not the best time to be giving a perspective on QCD in the domain of spectroscopy On second thought.... R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 Anxious times for friends of exotics... • SPRing - 8 I & II • Old phase shift analyses • CLAS I & II • CDF (uudds*, uuddc*, • Saphir uussd*) • Diana @ ITEP • HyperCP & E690 (FNL) • Neutrino Compendium • E690(uuddc*) • Hermes • Zeus (uuddc*) • Zeus • HERA-B (ddssu*) • COSY-TOF • Aleph, Delphi, OPAL • NA49 (uussd*, ...) • STAR & Phenix • H1 (uuddc*) • FOCUS (uussd*) • BaBar (uudds*, uuddc*) R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 QCD • Deep Inelastic ★★★★ • Chiral dynamics ★★★ • Lattice (brute force) ★★★ • QGP (thermal equilibrium) ★★ • Spectroscopy ★ Relatively quiet for many years Now reawakening! R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 Spectroscopy • Actually extraordinarily successful • Great breakthroughs occured before the advent of QCD! • Quarks are the effective degrees of freedom in QCD confinement & quarksquarksquarks QUARKSQUARKSQUARKS chiral symmetry gluons gluons gluons PIONS PIONS PIONS Remarkable!breaking Short distances LongR L Jaffdistancese JLab June 2004 Quark Models • Match naturally to DIS degrees of freedom • Mesons & Baryons -- spectroscopy & electroweak interactions • Never fully consistent with relativity -- relativistic single particle models but not field theoretic • Not the basis of a systematic expansion improving in accuracy R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 Chiral Soliton Models • Non-strange, ground state baryons • Negative parity baryons via scattering theory. • Extension to s-quarks -- controversial at best • Relation to QCD? Motivated by large Nc but large Nc gives quark Hartree picture (Witten). Skyrme? One flavor? • No place for mesons or heavy quark hadrons! R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 Systematic large N expansions Jenkins, Manohar, Dashen • Somewhat systematic and apparently quite predictive • New flavor symmetries at large N • Relations without dynamics • No insight into mesons R L Jaffe JLab June 2004 Personally..
    [Show full text]