Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives

1, J.-M. Richard ∗ 1Université de Lyon, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, IN2P3-CNRS–UCBL, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, 69622 Villeurbanne, France (Dated: Version of October 4, 2016) The physics of exotic hadrons is revisited and reviewed, with emphasis on flavour configurations which have not yet been investigated. The constituent quark model of multiquark states is discussed in some detail, as it can serve as a guide for more elaborate approaches.

I. INTRODUCTION the regularity patterns of the rest of the spectrum. The ex- otic character of a hadron is of course a time-dependent The physics of hadrons began about one century ago, concept: once a striking property of a hadron is con- when it became appealing to build nuclei from protons firmed by further measurements, and understood within and neutrons. The experimental search for the neutron a plausible theoretical framework, the hadron ceases to was soon resumed along with the search for the particle be exotic. predicted by Yukawa as being responsible for the tight Among the most famous examples, there is the φ me- binding of protons and neutrons. See, e.g., [1] for the son, a peak of mass 1.02 GeV with a remarkably small history of this early period. width of about 4 MeV [6], decaying preferentially into When interacting with nucleons or among themselves, a pair of kaons, though the decay into pions is energeti- the pions produce many resonances. The exchange of me- cally much easier. The decay patterns of the φ are now son resonances, and the formation of nucleon resonances understood from its quark content s¯s, where s denotes in the intermediate states are crucial for our understand- the strange quark, with very little mixing. The suppres- ing of the nuclear forces beyond the single-pion exchange sion of the internal annihilation of s¯s into light mesons proposed by Yukawa. For instance, the existence of the has been codified in terms of the so-called “Zweig rule”, vector mesons, nowadays known as ρ and ω, was some- eventually justified from the asymptotic-freedom limit what anticipated from the need for isospin-dependent of Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD). spin-orbit components in the nucleon-nucleon interac- The process took, however, several years, and was not tion. See, e.g., [2] for an introduction into the early litera- mature enough when the J/ψ particle was discovered ture on this subject. The discovery of numerous meson at the end of 1974; it is a meson of mass about 3.1 GeV or baryon resonances stimulated intense efforts to un- and width much less than 1 MeV [6]. Why the J/ψ was derstand the underlying mechanisms that generate the not immediately identified with c¯c? The great surprise hadrons. For instance, the ρ meson can be described as a was that the Zweig rule works too well! As compared ππ resonance in a p-wave, with the s-wave counterpart to the φ(1020), the J/ψ is three times heavier, so its being the scalar meson responsible for the spin-isospin phase-space for decay into light mesons is considerably averaged attraction observed in nuclei. In 1955, Chew larger, and yet its width is smaller! For the Υ, the effect is and Low described the ∆(1232) as the result of a strong even more pronounced, but when the Υ was discovered πN interaction [3], and today, the scattering of pions off in 1977 [6], the lesson was learnt, and the Υ was never nuclei is still pictured as series of ∆-hole formation and considered as exotic. annihilation.1 Today, any attempt to provide with a definition of an An ever more ambitious picture was proposed, called “exotic” hadron starts from the quark model. A meson “nuclear democracy” or “bootstrap”, in which every with quantum numbers that cannot be matched by any hadron consists of all possible sets of hadrons compatible spin-orbital state of a quark and an antiquark is obvi- with its quantum numbers [4]. Unfortunately, neither ously exotic. States with unusual properties but ordinary the models based on nucleons and pions as elementary quantum numbers are named “crypto-exotic” states. In bricks, nor the bootstrap, succeeded in providing an over- particular, ordinary baryons can reach any set of values all picture. For instance, the degeneracy of isospin I 0 P arXiv:1606.08593v3 [hep-ph] 3 Oct 2016 = of the spin-parity J with half-integer spin J and par- and I = 1 mesons such as ρ and ω, does not emerge ity P = 1, so a baryon cannot be exotic except for its naturally, if one assumes that their content is dominated flavour content.± A consensus has thus been reached that by the nucleon-antinucleon component [5]. a hadron is exotic if it cannot be understood as mainly From the very beginning, the attention was focused on made of quark-antiquark nor quark-quark-quark, but hadrons with properties that look unusual, in contrast to “mainly” remains vague. While simple quark models will propose a reference with a frozen number of con- stituents, more advance pictures include an expansion

∗ [email protected] in the Fock space, with additional quark-antiquark pairs 1 The author thanks G.F. Chew for an enlightening discussion on the in the wave function. The hope is that the expansion subject many years ago. converges, and that a clean separation emerges between 2 exotic and non-exotics. comparison of the different charge modes suggest a size- This review is organised as follows. In Sec. II, we shall able isospin I = 2 contribution. There are interesting review states with unusual properties in the light (Sec. theoretical studies on the production mechanism [23], II A), open heavy-flavour (Sec. II B), double heavy flavour but missing is a simple understanding of why there is (Sec. II C), and hidden heavy-flavour (Sec. II D) sectors. strong attraction in that channel in terms of quark dy- The baryon spectrum is discussed in Sec. III, with, again namics. a separation between the non-exotic light sector (Sec. There is an intense activity in the search of glueballs III A for non strange and Sec. III B for strange baryons), and light hybrids, either as supernumerary states with the exotic light pentaquark with positive strangeness ordinary quantum numbers J PC , or as genuine exotics in Sec. III C, the case of open heavy-flavour, single (Sec. with J PC that cannot be matched by ordinary quantum III D) or double single (Sec. III E), the anticharmed pen- + numbers. In particular, evidence has been found for 1− taquark in Sec. III F, and the case of hidden heavy-flavour states between 1 and 2 GeV2 by VES at Serpukhov[24], (Sec. III G) with in, particular, the recent pentaquark by E852 at Brookhaven [25], and by COMPASS at CERN states found by the LHCb collaboration. The multibaryon [26], and the search is resumed actively, in particular by systems will be discussed in Sec. IV. The various theo- GLUEX at Jlab [27]. For a thorough review of the other retical models will be reviewed in Sec. V, with some contributions, see, e.g., [28]. emphasis on string dynamics and potential models. Some limits have to be set. The case of light hadrons will be just outlined, to focus more on the most recent states containing heavy quarks or antiquarks. In the for- B. Mesons with single heavy flavour mer sector, the literature is enormous, and can be traced back from the conference proceedings that will be cited The charmed mesons D, D∗ have been discovered in the next sections, from some well-known reviews such shortly after the charmonium, and the mesons with as [6–9], or from study groups for future facilities [10–13]. charm and strangeness Ds, Ds∗ have followed. Relevant For the recent exotics with hidden charm, there exists for this review on exotics are the so-called Ds,J states. already excellent and even comprehensive reviews, such As summarised in [29], the Ds∗,0(2317) was discovered at as [14–17]. Our aim here is not to compete with these BaBar [30] and the Ds∗,1(2460) at CLEO [31], with a mass reviews, nor to duplicate them, but rather to discuss remarkably lower than predicted in the “bible” [32] and critically the recent findings and the models that they in similar quark-model calculations. Note that the tuning inspired. So, this paper will be more subjective. Hope- of the spin-dependent forces in such models has been fully, it will trigger some discussion, and, perhaps, attract often debated, and no consensus has ever been reached, newcomers into the field, where innovative ideas are wel- see, e.g., [33]. To explain the low mass and the proper- come. ties of the D states, the coupling to the nearby D( )K( ) The bibliography for such a subject cannot be compre- sJ∗ ∗ ∗ thresholds certainly plays a role. These mesons have hensive. Some past review articles are cited, which give even been considered as molecules, for instance, in [34]. access to the early papers. We apologise in advance in the event where some important contributions are inad- vertently omitted. C. Mesons with double heavy flavour

II. MESONS After, the discovery of charm, it has been early recog- nized that configurations including both light and heavy A. Light mesons quarks or antiquarks might be particularly interesting, for instance, in the case of baryon-antibaryon or multi- There are many hot issues on light mesons: why are baryon systems [35]. Another pioneering contribution the pseudoscalars so light? what is the status of the many was due to Isgur and Lipkin [36] who considered the scalar mesons? why ideal mixing and Zweig rule work flavour exotic (csq¯q¯) configuration. so well in some sectors, and not in other sectors? We refer, Shortly after, even more exotic mesons were stud- e.g., to [9] for a critical survey of the claims for exotics, ied, (QQ0q¯q¯0), with two heavy quarks and two light an- and to [18] for a thorough discussion within QCD and tiquarks. As explained later in this review, their exis- the bibliography, and to the last hadron conferences for tence is a prediction shared by many theorists using dif- an update [19–21]. ferent approaches, which will be discussed in the next 2 One of the puzzles arises from the γγ ρρ , mea- sections. Doubly-heavy exotics, which are surprisingly sured in several experiments, in particular at→ L3 [22]: the omitted in some “reviews” on multiquarks, have not yet been searched for in any experiment, but will be one of the goals of future experiments, and several the- orists estimated the rate of production at hadron [37] or 2 I thank Bernard Pire for calling my attention on this channel electron [38] colliders, or in the decay of hadrons with 3

3 + beauty [39]. The production of two charm-anticharm the Z (4430) by the Belle collaboration, in the π±ψ(2s) pairs is somewhat disconcerting, with the good surprise mass distribution of the decay B Kπ±ψ(2s) [49]. of a rather abundant production of double charmonium, It is hardly possible to list all the→ states of X , Y or Z type leading for instance to the identification of the ηc(2s) re- without duplicating the very comprehensive reviews coiling against the J/ψ [40], and, on the other hand, the such as [16, 17]. Let us stress a few points: double-charm baryons have not been confirmed in recent experiments, see Sec. III E. The X (3940) and X (4160) have been seen in • double-charmonium production [50], which gives a clear signature of their c¯c content, D. Mesons with hidden charm or beauty Some states have been seen in γγ, indicating a • PC charge conjugation C = +1, and very likely J = ¯ The spectrum is quarkonia, (c¯c) and (bb), is now rather 0++ or 2++. This is the case for Z(3930), X (3915) well known and well understood. For a while, the most and X (4350) [51]. delicate experimental sector was the one of spin-singlet Some states, in particular among the above ones, states, such as ηc,b(ns), hc,b(np). For instance, a first can- • are just candidates for radial excitations of char- didate for the ηc(1s) was announced about 300 MeV be- low the J/ψ, triggering some premature announcements monium. If confirmed, they indicate the supernu- on the quark dynamics, but eventually replaced by a merary character of other states sharing the same quantum numbers. more reasonable ηc(1s) about 112 MeV below J/ψ, see, e.g., the reviews [41]. A first indication for the h was c The Y 4630 has been seen as an enhancement given a by ¯pp formation experiment at CERN [42], with ( ) • in the spectrum of the ISR reaction e+e another indication in a similar experiment at Fermilab ΛcΛc − γ ¯ [52]. Many references about this state can be→ [43]. It was eventually firmly identified at CLEO [44]. ΛcΛc found in a recent paper [53]. As stressed in this lit- The η 2s was seen at Belle in B decay [45] and in double- c( ) erature, the decay into a baryon and an antibaryon charmonium production [40]. It also took some time until might indicate a “baryonium” type of structure, b¯b the spin-singlet states of ( ) were identified [6]. though other scenarios have been proposed [54]. Above the threshold, DD¯ for charmonium and BB¯ for bottomonium, the spectrum was known to be more in- There is sometimes a clustering of states with simi- tricate, with broader peaks, and an interplay of s- and • lar masses. It might the same state with a peak that d-states mixed with the (Qq¯)(Qq¯ ) continuum, and it was depends on the production and decay process. a somewhat a daily grind to improve the measurements. Most quark models and, to a lesser extent, molecu- Then came the shock of the discovery of the X (3872) • + lar models predict an isospin I 1 partner of the by Belle [46], in the π π−J/ψ mass spectrum of the reac- = + I 0 state, analogous to ρ vs. ω. This stimulated tion B± K±π π−J/ψ. Neither the mass nor the decay = properties→ were according to the expectations of the char- searches for charged partner, such as [55]. 23P monium models, in particular for the 2 level. On the While the X 3872 has been seen in many experi- other hand, such a state was announced in the molec- • ( ) ments, Y (4260) in a few experiments, some states ular models, as discussed in Sec. V D 3. Not only the have been seen in just a single experiment. In experts on quark- or hadron-dynamics commented this between, Zc(3900)± has been seen by Belle and new state, but also some non-experts became attracted BESIII [56], but these experiments share many col- to the subject. + laborators, and used the same reaction e e− As well summarised in a recent review [47], a second Y 4260 π Z , with a slight variant for the con-→ Y 4260 ( ) ∓ c± shock was the discovery of the ( ) by BaBar [48], in firmation→ by CLEO [57]. So, the negative result of e+e 4 1 − with ISR. This −− sector of charmonium was al- a search by COMPASS in photoproduction is par- ready thoroughly explored, with radial excitations, with ticularly important for the existence or at least the s- and d-waves mixed between them and with the contin- coupling properties of this state [58]. uum. So this new state was immediately associated with an exotic, or, say crypto-exotic structure. The Y 4260 The lightest XYZ states have minimal quark con- ( ) • was seen also at CLEO and Belle [6]. tent c¯cqq¯, where q = u, d. In several mod- A third shock was the discovery of charged states, with els, their c¯cs¯s with hidden strangeness are ex- minimal content c¯cud¯ or c.c. The first announcement was pected. Recently, the LHCB collaboration re- analysed the J/ψ φ mass spectrum from the decay B J/ψ φK [59], and found evidence for X (4140) PC and→X (4264) both with J = 1++, in disagreement 3 I thank Angelo Esposito and Alessandro Pilloni for a reminder about with some models (cited in [59]) and in partial or this reference. full agreement with others, in particular the exten- 4 + Initial State Radiation, this means that the reaction is e e− γ + sion by Stancu [59] of the chromomagnetic model e+e γ Y 4260 → − + ( ). proposed for the X 3872 [60]. → ( ) 4

The models somewhat differ about the existence tion is possible for I = 1/2 (uud), but not for I = 3/2 (uuu) • ¯ and location of the bb analogues of the exotic nor I = 0 (ccc). mesons with hidden charm: the heavier b-quark Experimentally, the search for doubly-excited baryons mass, for instance, suppresses the chromomagnetic is difficult. As often underlined (see, e.g., [62]) photon or effect but enhances the chromoelectric ones, while meson scattering off a nuclear target favours the produc- the coupling schemes are sensitive to the gap be- tion of states with a single quark being excited. And in tween bare quarkonia and meson pairs. The list of amplitude analyses, doubly excited baryons, if any, come candidates is rather scarce for the time being, and in a region that is already well populated! are due to Belle only. The charged Zb±(10610) and Another hot issue is the Roper resonance, an excitation ¯ with the same quantum numbers as the ground state. In Zb±(10650) have been seen in Υ(5s) (bb)Zb±π∓, ¯ → potential models, this is mainly a hyper-radial excitation, where (bb) stands here for some lower Υ(ns) or but in explicit model calculations, it is found higher than hb(1p) or hb(2p). Later, Belle also got some can- 0 the negative-parity excitation, while the experimental didate for the neutral Zb(10610) . On the other Roper state lies degenerate or even slightly below the hand, a search for the heavy partner of X (3872), + lowest negative-parity excitation. Chiral dynamics, as decaying into ωΥ(1s) or π π−Υ(1s), has been so far unsuccessful. implemented in specific models or in lattice simulations, accounts for this property, which sets limits to naive potential models. III. BARYONS

B. Light baryons with negative strangeness The history of the quark model is intimately linked to baryon spectroscopy. One of the motivation for SU(3) Here, again, is the problem of missing states, with slow flavour symmetry, nowadays denoted SU(3)F, was the observation that the hyperons have properties similar but continuous progress to fill the holes. A very striking to that of non-strange baryons. The quark model was property is the low mass of the Λ(1405), discussed first developed first in the baryon sector, with the pioneering by Dalitz [63] and now in an abundant literature (see, works by Greenberg, Dalitz, etc., and pushed very far by e.g., [64] for a recent summary). In the case of the nu- the subsequent works by Dalitz et al., Hey et al., Isgur cleon spectrum, the spin-orbit splittings, such as between and Karl, and many others. For a review, see, e.g., [61]. N(1520) with (1/2)− and N(1535) with (3/2)−, are very Obviously, the field has been much enriched by the study small, and Isgur and Karl, for instance, have set the spin- of baryons with charm or beauty, and baryons carrying orbit potential to zero in their fit [65]. Hence the large two or three heavy flavoured quarks are eagerly awaited. Λ(1520) Λ(1405) splitting of the strange analogues ap- pears as− somewhat a surprise in a pure quark model. A minimal solution explains the discrepancy by a shift A. Non strange light baryons due the coupling to the nearby KN threshold. Similarly, ¯ the ψ0 is shifted down by the nearby DD threshold, and the hyperfine splitting ψ0 ηc(2s) is slightly smaller than There are many issues there, that have been presented 3 expected. Similarly, the 2− P2 state of charmonium gets in conferences such as “Baryons”, “Nstar”, etc. For years, ¯ one of the most striking issues was the signature for some admixture of DD + c.c. in conservative models of the “symmetric quark model” with two degrees of free- the X (3872), etc. dom, vs. the quark–diquark model. Clearly, the recent Now, a more appealing solution is also suggested, J P 1/2 progress, as e.g., summarised at the recent conference in which there are two poles with = ( )− near ¯ in Tallahassee [21], confirms the existence of states such Λ(1405) [66], a mixing of a KN molecule and a quark- model state. As often underlined in the case of mesons as N(1900) which cannot be accommodated in a naive quark-diquark picture with a frozen diquark. [67], the mixing scheme might be more involved than in The lightest state with an excitation in each of the Ja- ordinary quantum mechanics, with the absorptive part, i.e., the coupling the decay channels, playing the major cobi variables, say, x r r and y 2r r r / 3, = 2 1 = ( 3 1 2) p role. has isospin I = 1/2, spin s−= 1/2 and orbital− momentum− and parity ` = 1+. In the particular case of the harmonic oscillator, its wave function reads C. Light baryons with positive strangeness 2 2 Ψ(x, y) = x y exp( a(x + y )/2) , (1) × − For years, there has been debates about baryons car- and is antisymmetric under the permutations. Thus, if rying positive strangeness. In the 60s and 70s, much associated with an antisymmetric colour wave function effort was devoted to exploit the analyticity properties (3 3 3 1) and an antisymmetric spin-isospin wave of the S-matrix, and to reconstruct the amplitudes from function,× × it→ fits perfectly the requirement of Fermi statis- the scattering data. This program was rather successful tics. Note that an antisymmetric spin-isospin wave func- in the case of the πN and KN¯ reactions, and led to the 5 identification of a number of baryon resonances with D. Baryons with single heavy flavour strangeness S = 0 and S = 1, respectively. The case of KN scattering with S = +1 −was much more delicate and In the last 20 years, much experimental progress has controversial. Some early analyses, based only on dif- been done in the sector of baryons with single charm ferential cross-sections (and just a few data on the recoil or beauty. When available, the comparison of b- and polarisation), suggested the possibility of resonances, see, c-baryons is compatible with the idea of a flavour- for instance, [68]. The resonances were named ZI or ZI∗, independent confinement. For instance, the first evidence where I 0 or 1 is the isospin. = for Ωb(bss) came from D0 at Fermilab, with a mass about Then came data on the analysing power, obtained us- 6165 MeV, corresponding to a double-strangeness excita- ing a polarised target, as in [69]. Not surprisingly, the tion Ωb Λb substantially larger than its charm analogue. uncertainties were narrowed [70], and the Z resonances Further− measurements by CDF at Fermilab and LHCb tended to fade away. For years, the Particle Data Group at CERN gave a mass around 6050 in closer agreement (PDG), summarised the state of art, as in the 1980 edi- with the expectations [77]. tion [71], where one finds candidates for several exotic A remarkable feature of charmed baryons is their nar- 6 2880 17 baryons with S = +1. There are Z0(1780) and Z0(1865) rowness, with, e.g., Γ MeV for Λc( ), MeV 2940 4 ∼ 3123 ∼ in the isospin I = 0 sector, and Z1(1900), Z1(2150) and for Λc( ), MeV for Ξc( ) [6]. Of course, this ∼ Z1(2500) for I = 1. Then the Z baryon disappeared from gives a better view on the spectrum than in the case the review, and the letter Z was given to another parti- of overlapping resonances. An optimistic columnist of cle. Note that other risky amplitudes analyses were done PDG [78] even stated: “. . . models of baryon-resonance + + spectroscopy should now start with the narrow charmed later, for instance for ¯pp π π− or K K− before the advent of data taken on the→ polarised target, or for the baryons, and work back to those broad old resonances.” elastic ¯pp scattering with just data on the polarisation, Among the current discussions, there is the suggestion while the simpler pp case notoriously requires several that Λc(2980) is mainly a D∗ p molecule [79]. spin observables. The same narrowness is observed for b-baryons, as listed in the latest PDG review [6] or revealed in the Act two of the play is better known. Meanwhile the latest LHCb papers [80]. name “pentaquark” was introduced in the anticharmed sector, as will be discussed shortly, in Sec. III F. It reflects that the minimal content of the Z baryon is ¯sqqqq . In I ( ) E. Baryons with double charm 2003, Nakano et al. found a narrow peak in the K+n dis- + tribution of the reaction γn K−K n [72]. This state, + Thirty years ago, double charm baryons were consid- named θ (1540), was predicted→ in a model by Diakonov et al. [73] based on some developments of the chiral dy- ered as just a straightforward extension of the quark namics. It was of course rather remarkable to have a model, to be checked just for the sake of completeness. At relatively small experiment revealing a major discovery. most, some experts stressed the co-existence within the But the sequels quickly went out of control. On the the- same hadron of the slow, adiabatic, charmonium-like mo- ory side, a flurry of papers, with hasty calculations and tion of the two heavy quarks, and the fast, D-meson-like ad-hoc assumptions. On the experimental side, some motion of the light quark around them. In the literature, collaborations discovered that they had data on tape, (ccq) is often described as a quark-diquark [81]; however, that were never analysed, and contained in fact the pen- the first excitations occur between the two heavy quarks taquark! Other positive results came, both for the θ +, and thus one has to introduce “excited diquarks”. An alternative is the Born-Oppenheimer method [82], which, and for other members of the anti-decuplet of SU(3)F that was predicted. However, the trend became inverted, and as discussed later, might also be adequate in the XYZ experiments with better statistics and particle identifi- sector and for hybrids. cation did not confirm the existence of the these light Some evidence for double-charm baryons was found pentaquarks. This is reviewed for instance in [74]. The at Fermilab, in the SELEX experiment [83], but unfortu- theory part also came under better scrutiny. In Ref. [75], nately not confirmed in other experiments at Fermilab some lattice QCD calculations following the discovery of or elsewhere [84]. This becomes particularly annoying. the θ + are criticised. In, e.g., [76], some inconsistencies Double-charm baryons will certainly receive more atten- are pointed out in the estimate of the width in the model tion in the near future [85]. of Diakonov et al., a crucial property of the putative light It is an important question to understand why double- pentaquark.5 charm baryons have not yet been seen. If the golden modes such as Λc + K or Λ + D are suppressed, the de- tection scheme should be revised. And, perhaps, new production mechanisms should be exploited. Our ability to detect double-charm baryons and mea- sure their properties is eagerly watched by people wait- 5 I thank Herbert Weigel for an informative correspondence on this ing for exotic tetraquarks and dibaryons. As pointed point. out in [86], the binding and the correlation of the two 6

b c b c charmed quarks in (ccq) gives some idea about (ccq¯q¯) u c¯ u c¯ d d and (ccqqqq). And, in most production experiments, they W − s W − d share the same triggers, so that a simultaneous search u¯ u¯ u u for double-charm baryons, mesons and dibaryons can be u u envisaged. d d

FIG. 1. Λb J/ψ + p + K decay (left) and Λb J/ψ + p + π decay (right)→ → F. Anticharmed baryons

Two simultaneous papers by Gignoux et al. and Lipkin measured by LHCb and published before the discovery [87], in which the word “pentaquark” was first used, sug- of hidden-charm pentaquarks [95], but the statistics was ¯ gested the existence of stable or metastable states (Qqqqq) not sufficient to identify peaks. This reaction has been with qqqq denoting uuds, ddsu or ssud. This pentaquark discussed in a few papers, as well as other weak decays was searched for in an experiment at Fermilab, which involving the hidden-charm pentaquark [96, 97], shown was not conclusive [88]. At the time of the light pen- in Fig. 2. A more recent analysis of the reaction Λb taquark, the H1 collaboration at HERA looked at the D¯ p ∗ J/ψ + p + π provides some support for the contribution→ mass spectrum, i.e., states of minimal content (¯cuudd), of hidden-charm pentaquarks [98]. without strangeness contrary to the prediction in [87], and found a peak near 3.1 GeV with a width of about b c u c¯ b c 12 MeV [89], which was confirmed neither by Zeus [90], s W − d¯ c¯ d also operating at HERA, nor by BaBar [91] at SLAC, nor u W − d u uu in the analysis by H1 of their HERA II data.6 The an- u¯ u¯u¯ ticharmed pentaquark was initially one the goals of the s d¯ COMPASS experiment [92], but it has disappeared from the agenda. FIG. 2. Other weak decays of b-hadrons producing a hidden- charm pentaquark.

G. Baryons with hidden charm or beauty It has been proposed [99] to check the existence of the LHCb pentaquarks and provide more information on This is one of the latest findings, inducing an intense their properties by studying the photoproduction reac- phenomenological activity supplementing the discus- tion γ + p J/ψ + p, and the experiment will be done at sions about XYZ mesons. The rumour is that, due to Jlab. → the bad reputation of the light pentaquark, the LHCb collaboration tried during months to kill the evidence, with more checks than usual for this type of discovery. IV. MULTIBARYONS The result published in [93] deals with the weak decay A. Dibaryons Λb J/ψ + p + K , (2) → The situation in the non-strange sector has been re- of the lowest baryon with beauty. The Dalitz plot, as well cently reviewed at the Conference Baryon 2016 [100]. as the (p, J/ψ) mass spectrum, indicates two peaks, one There are regularly some claims for resonant behaviour with a mass of 4380 8 29 MeV and a width of 205 of some partial waves [101]. Negative results include: 18 86 MeV, an another± ± with a mass of 4449.8 1.7 ± [102] in the isospin I = 2 sector, [103] for multineutrons 2.5±MeV and a width of 39 5 19 MeV. As the ±b mass± Λ bound by a few π−. The most serious candidates are the is always reconstructed, some± ± ambiguities are removed. state of mass 2380 MeV and width 70 MeV by the WASA ( ) 3 3 The background is fitted as J/ψ + Λ ∗ , with many Λ∗ collaboration, in the D3 G3 coupled partial waves, cor- excitations, up to high mass and high spin. When two responding to 3− [104], which was expected by various resonances are added, the preferred quantum numbers models [105], and the more recent state at 2.15 GeV which are spin J = 3/2 and 5/2, and opposite parities, namely is under investigation at Jlab [100]. 3/2 5/2 ( )± and ( )∓. See, also, [94]. In the sector of single strangeness S = 1, there are The process is schematically described in Fig. 1, as recurrent discussions about the possibility− of dibaryons. well as the companion reaction (Cabibbo suppressed) See, e.g., [106] and refs. there. Note that a study of the J/ψ p π. This process J/ψ p π has been Λb + + Λb + + atomic (K−, p, p) system could provide some indirect in- → → + formation. In the two-body case, say (a , b−), the atomic spectrum is much modified if the strong-interaction (a, b) potential generates a bound state near threshold. This 6 I thank Katja Krüger and Stefan Schmitt for a clarifying correspon- was realised by Zel’dovich in the 50’s and has been much dence. studied [107]. The case of three-body exotic atoms with 7 a combination of Coulomb interaction and short-range A. Duality hadronic interaction remains to be clarified, but probably deserves a detailed study.7 In the 60s, much attention was paid to crossing symme- The most advertised case deals with strangeness S ¯ = try, which relates, e.g., a + b c + d (s) to a + ¯c b + 2, following the work by Jaffe[108] on the coherent chro- d (t). The reaction (t) describes→ what is exchanged→ to −momagnetic attraction in H uuddss with isospin and = ( ) monitor the direct reaction (s). It is reasonable to assume spin I = J = 0. More than 20 experiments have searched an equivalence between the content of the two reactions, without success for the H, ranging from the absence of ¯ ¯ as well as that of the third reaction, a + d b + c (u). H in the decay of double hypernuclei [109] to the mass This principle of duality was often used as→ a constraint spectra emerging from heavy-ion collisions [110]. New in building models. For instance, if one describes πN experiments are currently under construction. The status elastic scattering with several N ( ) and ( ) resonances, of theoretical studies will be reviewed in Sec. V I 1. ∗ ∆ ∗ duality dictates to refrain from exchanging σ, ρ, . . . , in The speculations have been extended to the S 3 = the t-channel. sector, see, e.g., [111]. − A consequence of duality is that is the reaction (s) is weak, i.e., without resonances, it does not benefit from t B. Light hypernuclei, neutron-rich hypernuclei coherent -channel exchanges. Though duality was first formulated at the hadron level, it is nowadays explained in terms of quark diagrams. We refer to [116] for a review If the H, considered as ΛΛ system, is close to binding, and references. For instance, in the case of ππ scattering as well as some other baryon-baryon systems, it is natural with isospin I = 0, the diagram of Fig. 3 (left) shows to guess that some multi-baryon configurations will be that the possibility of annihilating a quar-antiquark pair bound, as an illustration of the quantum phenomenon of opens the way for (qq¯) exchange in the t-channel and (qq¯) Borromean binding [112]. There are for instance debates resonances in the s-channel. This is why there is a strong about the existence of , , N or , , n, n [113], as well (Λ Λ ) (Λ Λ ) ππ interaction with I = 0. On the other hand, for isospin as NN or NN [114]. The field of hypernuclear ( Ξ) ( ΞΞ) I = 2, there is s-channel resonance, and the t-channel physics is rather active, with new facilities contributing, dynamics suffers from a more intricate topology. and is reviewed regularly at dedicated conferences. Similarly, KN¯ scattering, shown in Fig. 3 (right), bene- Almost immediately after the discovery of charm, the fits from both (qqq) resonances in the s-channel and (qq¯) possibility of new species of hypernuclei was envisaged, exchanges in the t-channel. This is not the case for KN with hyperons replaced by charmed baryons [35]. scattering which is notoriously less strong. m m V. THEORY m m m m B B In atomic physics, the study of multi-electron systems looks at first rather straightforward: the same non rela- tivistic dynamics is at work, and one has “just” to solve FIG. 3. Duality diagram for meson-meson scattering (left) and the N-body equations with increasing N. Even there, the meson-baryon scattering (right). progress is slow, and the calculations, which are very delicate, have to be cross-checked. For instance, the last This led Rosner to address the problem of baryon- + antibaryon scattering [117], which is depicted in Fig. 4. bound state of H2 , the excitations of the positronium molecule or the existence of Borromean molecules were The interaction is very strong, and benefits, indeed, from discovered only recently [115]. In nuclear physics, the the exchanges of mesons in the t-channel. Hence there situation is even more delicate, as the basic two-body should be resonances in the s-channel. This is how bary- interaction is presumably modified by the presence of onium was predicted. other nucleons, and supplemented by 3-body forces. In QCD, the situation is even worse. If one uses simple B¯ B¯ constituent models to describe mesons and baryons, their extension to multiquark states is hazardous. If one uses B B more sophisticated approaches to ordinary hadrons, their application to higher configurations becomes technically FIG. 4. Duality diagram for baryon-antibaryon scattering. The very difficult. Before discussing in some details a few intermediate state in the s-channel (intersecting the dotted line) specific schemes, we review the early history of exotic contains two quarks and two antiquarks. The intermediate hadrons. state in the t-channel (crossing the dashed line) is made of a quark and antiquark.

As noted by Roy [116], once one accepts baryonium, in 7 I thank Claude Fayard for several discussions on this topics. a Gedankenexperiment colliding a baryonium against a 8

baryon, meson-exchange is dual of a pentaquark. In turn, corresponds to the pionic cascade ∗ +π, while the the analysis of pentaquark-baryon scattering implies the breaking of the central string correspondsB → B to the decay existence of dibaryons! This is illustrated in Fig. 5. into baryon and antibaryon. Several experimental states were good candidates for baryonium [7, 120], but they were not confirmed in experiments using better antipro- P P ton beams. Perhaps the nucleon-antinucleon interaction B B suffers from too strong an annihilation, while the heavy B B B B quark sector gives better opportunities. The model can be extended to more complicated struc- tures, as to include pentaquarks and dibaryons. Some FIG. 5. Pandora box syndrome for duality. Left: pentaquarks examples are given in Fig. 8. (four quarks and an antiquark in the s-channel) dual of mesons (quark-antiquark in the t-channel) in baryonium-baryon scat- tering. Right: dibaryon (six quarks in the s-channel) dual of mesons (quark-antiquark in the t-channel) in pentaquark- baryon scattering.

B. String dynamics FIG. 8. Possible string structures for pentaquarks (left) and In line with duality, a string model was developed for dibaryons (right). hadrons, explaining why the squared masses increase linearly with the spin J. This model was echoed by the elongated version of the bag model, the flux-tube model, or some potential models with multi-body forces which C. Colour chemistry will be mentioned later in this section. The string model was first rather empirical, but later received a support from some topological and non- The above string pictures of baryonium was chal- perturbative properties of QCD, as reviewed recently lenged by other schemes: the nuclear model which is [118]. The mesons are pictured as a string linking a quark reviewed in the next section, and some quark models. to antiquark, see Fig. 6 (left). The picture of baryons One of them describes baryonium states as a diquark and an antidiquark separated by an orbital barrier which suppresses the decay into mesons [121]. In colour chem- istry, there is also the possibility of colour-sextet diquark, and thus of (qq) (q¯q¯) states, named ‘mock baryonia” J which are predicted− to be rather narrow [122]. This was, indeed, an interesting challenge to identify spectroscopic signatures of the colour degree of freedom. FIG. 6. String model of ordinary mesons (left) and baryons (right). D. Molecular binding was suggested by Artru, and rediscovered in several ap- proaches [119]. It consists of three strings linking each The name has evolved. It used to be quasi-nuclear, and quark to a junction J, which plays somewhat the role of became molecular model. It starts with the observation a fourth constituent of each baryon, and, in particular, is that the meson-exchange interaction of Yukawa, which submitted to an extension of the Zweig rule, which pro- successfully binds the deuteron and other nuclei, holds hibits any internal junction-junction annihilation. In this for other hadrons, in particular these containing light scheme, the baryonium of Rosner contains two junctions, quarks. see Fig. 7 and thus widely differs from a set of two discon- nected mesons. The decay of baryonium occurs by string 1. Baryon-antibaryon

In the 60s, attempts have been made to describe mesons as baryon-antibaryon states, a simplified ver- sion of the bootstrap. Fermi and Yang [123] had noticed FIG. 7. String model of baryonium. that the N N¯ potential is often more attractive than the NN one, as the cancellations in the latter become coher- breaking via pair creation: in the case of an external leg, it ences in the former. But this approach does not account 9 for some important properties of the meson spectrum [5], 4. Molecular pentaquark such as exchange degeneracy, e.g., the ρ and ω having the same mass. The anticharmed pentaquark has been studied with In the late 70s and early 80s, another point of view was molecular dynamics, as a light baryon linked to an an- adopted, namely that baryon-antibaryon bound states ticharmed meson. See, for instance, [132]. Note that the and resonances correspond to new type of mesons, lying uuds or ddsu and ssud content of the light sector in the higher in mass than ordinary mesons, and preferentially chromomagnetic model is not necessarily the same when ¯ ( ) ¯ ( ) coupled to the baryon-antibaryon channel. In practice, mesons are exchanged between a D ∗ or a Ds ∗ and a the N N¯ potential is deduced from the NN one by the baryon. G-parity rule: if the exchange of a meson m (or set of After the publication of the LHCb results on the mesons m) contributes as VI (m) to the NN potential in hidden-charm pentaquark [93], it was reminded or dis- ¯ isospin I, then its contributes as Gm VI (m) to the N N in covered that there were some predictions of bound states isospin I [123]. When annihilation is neglected, a rich of a charmed baryon and an anticharmed meson, in par- spectrum of bound states and resonances is found [124], ticular by Hofman and Lutz [133], Oset and collaborators with the hope than some of them will not become too [134], and Z.C. Yang et al. [135]. The game was even broad when annihilation is switched on. Before the dis- initiated earlier for the case of hidden-strangeness [136]. covery of the antiproton, annihilation was believed to be Of course, the model has been refined recently and com- be a short-range correction. However, the annihilation pared to the LHCb results. The literature is comprehen- part of the N N¯ integrated cross-section was measured to sively reviewed in [17]. be about twice the elastic one. To fit the cross- sections, One might wonder why the hidden-charm pentaquark one needs an annihilation acting up to about 1 fm, and was not searched for before, given the above predictions. this makes most quasi-nuclear baryonium states very broad. The molecular model might have better chances 1. There are many predictions vs. just a few experi- to predict exotics in channels with heavy hadrons whose ments, which are not primarily devoted to spec- interaction is less absorptive. troscopy. 2. In the molecular model, there are many states of this type, and it is not easy to focus on the configu- ration giving the best signature for the molecular dynamics. For instance, the binding of a charmed 2. Binding of heavy hadrons, first attempts baryon and an anticharmed antibaryon was already envisaged in 1977 [35], shortly after the meson- The Yukawa model made a come back in the heavy meson case [125], but he meson-baryon case was ( ) ( ) ( ) ¯ ( ) unfortunately overlooked in the 70s. quark sector. The D ∗ D ∗ or D ∗ D ∗ potential, where ( ) D ∗ = (cq¯), is perhaps weaker than the NN potential, but being experienced by heavier particles, it can pro- 3. There is rather generally more effort and more in- duce binding as well. The first papers were by Okun and terest in the meson than in the baryon sector. Voloshin and Glashow et al. [125]. In the latter case, the The negative parity states, either (3/2)− or (5/2)−, can idea was to explain some intriguing properties of some be accommodated in the molecular model, with a main high-lying charmonium states, but it was eventually re- s-wave between a meson and a baryon, and a small ad- alised that these properties were due to the nodes of the mixture of d-wave, as in the more familiar case of the wave function when the states are described as radial deuteron. The orbital excitation with positive parity is excitations [126]. probably much higher in mass.

5. Binding other heavy hadrons

3. Binding of heavy hadrons, XYZ ( ) ¯ ( ) In D ∗ D ∗ , the annihilation and creation of light quarks opens a coupling to c¯c, leading to description of some The best known application of the molecular model isoscalar XYZ states as a mixture of molecule and quarko- deals with XYZ states. Almost simultaneously, a few nium states. Isovector states do not mix with quarko- papers came, stressing the attraction due to one-pion- nium, except for some minor effects of isospin violation. ( ) ( ) ( ) ¯ ( ) exchange in some D ∗ D ∗ or D ∗ D ∗ channels [127–130]. The sector of double-charm molecules has also received Of course, the X (3872) discovery at Belle was greeted much attention, from the very beginning. See for in- as a success of this approach. Today, the X (3872) is gen- stance, [128, 137]. erally considered as having both a quarkonium and a It is immediately realised that if the exchange of ( ) ( ) ( ) ¯ ( ) ¯ ( ) multiquark component [131]. For a clarification of the mesons bind D ∗ D ∗ , D ∗ D ∗ , and Σc D ∗ their beauty or molecular approach, see [14, 131]. mixed charm-beauty analogues and other configurations 10 could as well be formed by this mechanism, such as some The ground state of the gluon field provide with the meson-baryon and baryon-baryon states [138]. usual quarkonium potential. The first excited state of the We already mentioned the prediction of hidden-charm gluon field is linked to the effective QQ¯ potential within a ¯ pentaquarks as molecules such as D∗Σc, before their dis- hybrid. The first (c¯cg) hybrid was predicted near 4.0 GeV, covery by LHCb. One could also include DN¯ or D¯-nuclei and this estimate has been much refined with the bag states, see, e.g., [139], where the possibility of DNN¯ states model replaced by more elaborate lattice calculations is also envisaged. The non-strange heavy pentaquark [148], or effective field theory [149]. DN¯ is related to the non-confirmed state claimed by H1 Note that in the late 70s and early 80s, the motivation [89]. was that the hybrids would show up clearly atop a clean In particular, there are many studies of bound states of and well-understood charmonium spectrum! With the charmed or doubly-charmed baryons with nucleons or proliferation of XYZ states, we realise today that identi- with other singly or doubly charmed baryons [140]. One fying hybrids is a little more challenging. can even speculate about a new periodic table, where ++ + the proton is replaced by Ξcc and the neutron by Ξcc [141]. Of course some rearrangement into triple charm G. QCD sum rules and single charm should be taken into account. In several model calculations, many interesting hadron-hadron systems are estimated at the edge be- The method of QCD sum rules (QCDSR) is a very tween binding and non-binding. This means that 3-body ambitious and efficient approach, initiated by Shifman, or larger systems are probably bound as long as they are Vainshtein and Zakharov [150], allowing an interpolation not suppressed by the Fermi statistics. So, accounting for between the rigorous perturbative regime and the long- the XYZ states implies many other states. range regime. For a review, see, e.g., [18]. It was first applied to ground-state mesons. There is no limitation, in principle, but the numerical stability become more E. Gluonium and more delicate for excitations with the same quantum numbers as the ground state (say, radial excitations). For baryons, the choice of the most appropriate operator is In QCD, the gluon field carries a colour charge and not unique, and triggered some debates. This is of course coupled to itself. This lead to speculations about the exis- even more delicate for multiquarks. Hence, the choice of tence of new neutral states, made essentially of gluons, the strategy is often dictated by models, such a diquark- except for g qq¯ loop corrections. This was sometimes antidiquark. hotly debated.↔ I remember for instance that in his talk A few groups have applied QCDSR to exotic states, in at the Thessaloniki conference on antiprotons, Van Hove particular at Montpellier, São Paulo and Peking, see, e.g., expressed doubts about the necessity of glueballs within [151] for examples of early attempts, and [15, 17, 152] for QCD, though the written version was somewhat soft- some reviews of the state of art over the years. Needless ened [142]. to say that QCDSR calculations of multiquark exotics are The estimates for the mass and even the quantum num- extremely delicate and require weeks of cross-checks. So bers of the lightest glueball or gluonium has somewhat any overnight analysis published just after the release of changed during the years. The situation is now stabilised, a new experimental state should have been anticipated and is reviewed, e.g., in [143]. Note that the lowest glue- + long in advance. balls with unusual quantum numbers, such as 0 −, are sometimes found with rather high masses [144].

H. Lattice QCD F. Hybrids Lattice QCD (LQCD) is well known and well adver- Another sector that used to be rather fashionable is tised, and hardly needs to be presented. For an intro- the one of hybrids. Very schematically, hybrids combine duction to the recent literature, see, e.g., [153]. Dramatic quark(s), antiquark(s) and gluons. There are even explicit progress have been accomplished on various aspects of constituent models in which the constituent gluon is strong interaction. There are interesting recent develop- given a mass, and interacts via an effective potential, see, ments, for instance to study how the results behave nu- e.g., [145]. merically and have to depend theoretically on the pion The first approaches describes hybrids as an excitation mass. Another extension deals with ab-initio nuclear of the string or, say, of the gluon field linking the quarks. physics, at least for light nuclei, and multiquark physics Some pioneering attempts can be found in [146]. In [147], [154], with in particular, a renewed interest in the study a Born-Oppenheimer treatment was made, with a variant of the H dibaryon. of the bag model used to estimate the energy of the gluon In the sector of heavy quark spectroscopy, LQCD has field. For a given interquark separation, the shape of confirmed many important results obtained by simpler, the bag is adjusted as to give the lowest gluon energy. but empirical, tools. For instance, the c¯c interaction of 11 charmonium, including its spin dependence, has been es- This means that the H is bound below the ΛΛ thresh- timated, in agreement with the current potential models. old by half the ∆-N splitting, about 150 MeV. The H was Latter, the charmonium spectrum was calculated directly. searched for in many experiments, without success so far. For instance, the double hypernucleus 6He [157] was As already mentioned, some decisive contributions ΛΛ were made for the study of hybrid mesons with hidden not seen decaying into H + α. heavy flavour [148]. A Born-Oppenheimer potential can The model has been reexamined thoroughly [158], be computed for other configurations, e.g., double-charm with the result that any correction tends to reduce the baryons, and LQCD is very suited for the treatment of binding, and eventually, the H is pushed in the contin- the light degrees of freedom. uum. These corrections are: SU(3)F breaking, more realis- For multiquarks, pure ab-initio studies are preceded tic estimate of the short-short correlation (a dibaryon is by preliminary investigations inspired by models. For in- more dilute than a baryon), and proper inclusion of the stance, in the sector of doubly-heavy mesons, an effective full Hamiltonian (kinetic energy and spin-independent ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) confinement besides V ). Of course, some additional QQ potential or an effective D ∗ D ∗ or B ∗ B ∗ interaction hyp has been studied see, e.g., [155]. Nowadays, multiquark attraction such a scalar-isoscalar exchange between the states are often studied directly on the lattice, without the two Λ can restore the binding. intermediate step of an effective potential. Needless to Meanwhile, some other configurations were found, for say, LQCD faces difficulties as QCDSR, for the study of which the chromomagnetic interaction, if alone, induces multiquark states. In the early days, the quantum num- binding. In 1987, the Grenoble group and H.J. Lipkin [87] bers were not always clearly identified, and the genuine proposed independently and simultaneously a heavy states were cleanly separated from the artefacts due to pentaquark P = (Qqqqq¯ ), where qqqq = uuds, ddsu or lattice boundaries. Nowadays, the field is mature, and ssud. With the same hypotheses as Jaffe’s for the H, and an impressive program of multiquark and multihadron assuming an infinite mass for the heavy antiquark Q¯, they P ˜ ˜ physics has been developed by several groups [154]. found an optimal λi.λj σiσ j = 16, to be compared 〈 〉 to 8 for the threshold (Qq¯ ) + (qqq), i.e., the same binding energy 150 MeV. In a series of papers [159], Leandri and I. Constituent models Silvestre-Brac applied the chromomagnetic operator C X ˜ ˜ In this section, we briefly survey some phenomeno- λi.λj σiσ j , (4) m m logical models which have been used to predict some − ihydrogen Now consider the actual values in Table I. molecule is more deeply bound (in units of the threshold binding energy) than the equal-mass molecules such as TABLE I. Strength coefficients for the positronium molecule Ps . The Hamiltonian for M +, M +, m , m reads 2 ( − −) and the tetraquark states with colour wave-function 33¯ or 66¯,    as well as for their threshold. The list of coefficients is of the 1 1 X 2 type g , g , g , g , g , g after suitable renumbering, and sum- H H H p V 0 0 00 00 00 00 = 0 + 1 = + i + { } 4 M 4 m marised as G = (1 λ) G0 + λ G1, where G0 is the symmetric   case g g 1/3. − 1 1 € Š 0 = 00 = p2 p2 p2 p2 . (7) + M m 1 + 2 3 4 4 − 4 − − (abcd) v(r) g0 g00 λ Ps + Ps 1/r 1 0 1 Its C-breaking term H1 lowers the ground-state energy − Ps2 1/r 1 1 2 with respect to the C-even part H0. Since H0, a rescaled − − − H (qq¯) + (qq¯) 1/r, r 1 0 1 version of the Ps2 molecule, and , have the same thresh- − old, and since Ps is stable, H is even more stable. [(qq)3¯(q¯q¯)3] 1/r, r 1/2 1/4 1/4 2 2 − Clearly, the Coulomb character of V hardly matters in [(qq)6(q¯q¯)6¯] 1/r, r 1/4 5/8 7/8 this reasoning. The key property is that the potential does − − − not change when the masses are modified. In the case The asymmetry parameter λ is much larger for Ps of a simple spin-independent potential with the colour- 2 than for Ps Ps. This explains| | why the positronium additive rule (6), one does not get binding for M m, + = molecule is bound.8 but binding shows up when M/m increases. A tetraquark with a pure 33¯ colour structure has its Note that, if one breaks the symmetry of Ps differently 2 asymmetry parameter smaller than that of the threshold and considers instead M +, m+, M , m configurations, ( − −) and has the same sign, so this toy model is rigorously M/m 2.2 M/m stability is lost for ¦ , or, of course, ® ¯ 1/2.2 [162]. A protonium atom cannot polarise strongly unbound. For 66, the signs are different, and the mag- enough a positronium atom and attach it. Similarly a nitude are comparable, so the analysis is more delicate. chromoelectric potential cannot produce a bound (QqQ¯q¯) tetraquark: one needs chromomagnetism or long-range Yukawa interaction. 8 Of course, this is not exactly what is written in the textbooks on b. More detailed comparison of Ps2 and tetraquark An- quantum chemistry, but a large λ means that Ps2 benefits from other problem is to understand why the positronium correlation and anticorrelation effects| | in the various pairs. 13

We note that λ = 2 for Ps2 results in a fragile binding, The same property is observed for the pentaquark [167], so it is not surprising| | that λ = 7/8 leaves 66¯ unbound Fig. 10, the dibaryon, Fig. 11 and the system made of in numerical studies. | | 3 quarks and 3 antiquarks [168], Fig. 12. However, To summarise, the tetraquark is penalised by the non- this string potential corresponds to a kind of Born- abelian character of the colour algebra in the simple Oppenheimer approximation for the colour fluxes at model (6), and its stability cannot rely on the asymme- given quark positions. It mixes colour 3¯ and 6 for any tries of the potential energy. It should use other asym- pair of quark, to optimise the overall energy. Thus it metries, in particular through the masses entering the holds for quarks bearing different flavours. In [169], kinetic energy, or spin effects, or mixing of 33¯ and 66¯, or an attempt is proposed to combine quark statistics and the coupling to decay channels, etc. string dynamics in the case of tetraquarks with identical c. String dynamics The prescription (6) is of course quarks or antiquarks: not surprisingly, the possibility of rather crude, as it treats colour as a global variable sim- binding is reduced. ilar to isospin, and assumes arbitrarily the choice of a pairwise interaction. It can be justified in the limiting cases were (N 1) quarks are clustered and the last quark isolated. So it− might provide a reasonable interpolation for other spatial configurations. As mentioned earlier, an alternative is the Y -shape FIG. 10. Some contributions to the pentaquark potential: for interaction of Fig. 6, now used to estimate a potential each set of quark positions, the minimum is taken of the con- which reads nected diagrams such as the one on the right and disconnected diagrams such as the one on the left. conf V λ min r1J r2J r3J , (10) Y = J ( + + ) if λ r12 is the linear confinement of mesons. Note that (10) features the minimal path linking three points, an old problem first raised by Fermat and Torricelli.9 For baryons alone, solving the 3-quark problem with (10) instead of the perimeter-based confinement

conf λ VP = (r12 + r23 + r31) , (11) FIG. 11. Some contributions to the hexaquark potential: for 2 each set of quark positions, the minimum is taken of the con- is technically more involved, but does not change the nected diagrams such as the one on the right and disconnected patterns of the excitation spectrum. diagrams such as the one on the left. For tetraquarks, a precursor of non-pairwise potential was the flip-flop model [165], with quadratic confine- ment. In the more recent linear version, one takes the minimum of the two possible meson-meson pairing con- figurations and the connected diagram shown in Fig. 9.

FIG. 9. Potential for the tetraquark in a simple string model. The minimum is taken of the connected diagram (right) and the two possible meson-meson diagrams (left).

The good surprise is that this potential is more attrac- tive than the one deduced from the colour-additive rule FIG. 12. Some contributions to the potential for 3 quarks and (6) and thus is more favourable for binding [164, 166]. 3 antiquarks: for each set of quark positions, the minimum is taken of connected diagrams (bottom, right) and disconnected diagrams (top and bottom left).

9 This minimal distance is also intimately linked to a theorem by Note that in the above potential models, there is no Napoleon: by adding external equilateral triangle on each side of the explicit junction à la Rossi and Veneziano: the minimal quark triangle, one easily construct the location of the junction J and length is the only guidance, and nothing refrain a transi- the value of the minimal sum of distances [164]. tion from a disconnected flip-flop to a connected string. It 14 is observed, however, that the ground-state uses mainly Many rigorous results have been revisited and developed the flip-flop term, so there are probably two classes of for studies related to the quarkonium: scaling law, virial- states: the lowest have the same number of junctions as like theorems, level order, value of wave-function at the the thrshold, and thus are rather broad if the fall-apart origin for the successive radial excitations, etc. This is decay is energetically allowed. The second class might be reviewed in [176]. higher in mass, but benefits from a kind of metastability The 3-body problem one has to solve for baryons is due to its junction content. often a psychological barrier that refrain to envisage a These string-inspired potentials, however simplistic, detailed and rigorous treatment beyond the harmonic have motivated some studies. For instance, the literature oscillator, and there is sometimes a confusion between on Steiner trees helps in optimising the location of the the “constituent model of baryons” and the ”harmonic junctions and the estimate of the minimal strength [164, oscillator model of baryons”. For instance, the negative- 170]. parity excitation being half-way of the positive-parity excitation is a property of the latter, but not necessarily 3. Combining chromoelectric and chromomagnetic effects of the former. For baryons, there are just a few rigorous results, for As discussed at length in Sec. V I 2, the tetraquark instance dealing the level order of states when the degen- (QQq¯q¯) might become stable by the sole effect of chro- eracy obtained in the harmonic oscillator or hyperscalar momagnetic forces, but the stability requires a very large limit are lifted at first order [177]. As for the numerical M/m mass ratio. It was also noticed [171, 172], that some solution, various methods have been used, such as hyper- PC configurations such as J = 1++, there is a favourable spherical expansion, Faddeev equations, or variational spin-spin interaction in the light sector that benefits the methods, with a comparison in [178]. Note that among tetraquark and not the threshold. A calculation by Rosina the latter, the expansion on a harmonic-oscillator basis et al. [172], using a potential tuned to fit the ordinary is less and less adopted, as it does not give good conver- hadrons, and the colour-additive rule, demonstrated sta- gence for the short-range correlation parameters which ¯ bility for (ccu¯d), and this was confirmed by Vijande et enter some decays and some production mechanisms. al. [173]. For multiquark systems, the hyperspherical expan- There are not too many similar configurations, in sion works rather well [173], especially for deeply bound which both chromoelectric and chromomagnetic effects states, if any, for which the various r.m.s. radii are of the are favourable. For instance, for the doubly-flavoured same order of magnitude. The tendency is towards the dibaryons (QQqqqq), the two thresholds (QQq) + (qqq) method of Gaussian expansion, already used in quantum and Qqq Qqq are nearly degenerate, at least in case ( ) + ( ) chemistry. If x˜ † x ,..., x are Jacobi variable de- the charm, Q c. The former threshold benefits from the = 1 N 1 = scribing the relative{ motion of− the} N-body system, then chromoelectric attraction between the two heavy quarks, the wave-function is sought as while the second can receive a favourable chromomag- netic interaction. It is, however, difficult for the 6-quark configuration to combine astutely the two effects, and X † double-charm baryons seem hardly stable in constituent Ψ = γa,i exp[ x˜ .Aa,i.x˜/2] a , (13) − | 〉 models [174]. a,i

where a denotes the basis of internal colour-spin- 4. Solving the Schrödinger equation flavour| states〉 needed to construct the most general colour singlet of given overall spin and flavour, and Aa,i is a Once a model is adopted, typically (N 1) (N 1) definite positive symmetric matrix. For a given− × set of− matrices Aa,i, the weight factors γa,i are 16 X ” — V λ˜ .λ˜ v r v r σ .σ , (12) given by a generalised eigenvalue equation. Then the = 3 i j ( i j) + ss( i j) i j − i

5. Limits and extensions quarkonium potential”: for a given QQ¯ separation, the en- ergy of the excited gluon field is computed either from a a. Diquarks Hadron spectroscopy with diquarks has simple bag model, or from LQCD. A Born-Oppenheimer ups and downs, or, say, pros and cons. The art of treatment of (QQq¯q¯) would also be feasible, to cross- physics is to identity effective degrees of freedom at a check the 4-body calculations discussed in Sec. V I 2. certain scale, and any simplification is welcome. The Recently, a very comprehensive and unifying Born- concept of diquark is very useful to describe many phe- Oppenheimer treatment of the XYZ states was presented ¯ nomenons such a multiple production [181], and might [187], with a series of effective QQ potentials adapted to be legitimated by boson-fermion symmetry [182]. In the quantum states of the light constituents (gluon and spectroscopy, the diquark model provides a simple phys- light quarks). This work could of course be generalised ical picture that might be obscured in complicated three- as to include qqq instead of qq¯ in the light sector, and body calculations, and it provides an efficient tool for applied to the LHCb pentaquarks. investigating exotics [183]. Some reservations are how- There are interesting alternatives for the coupling of ¯ ever expressed about the abundant literature on diquarks, QQ to light quarks and antiquarks. For instance, a rel- which is sometimes confusing, as some recent papers do atively weak interaction between J/ψ or ηc with nu- refer to the old ones: clei has been proposed, but, once more, this potential is probed by a particle which is heavy enough to get Explicit quark model calculations find diquark cor- bound. In hadrocharmonium, the compact QQ¯ is trapped • relations, but the effect depends on a somewhat ar- inside an extended light hadron. See [131, 188]. bitrary regularisation of the chromomagnetic inter- action [184]. In other studies, no diquark clustering is found for the ground state [185]. This means that VI. SUPER-EXOTICS the diquark picture of low-lying baryons implies a change of dynamics. On the other hand, a dy- In the future, the field of exotic hadrons might be ex- namical diquark formation is obtained for highly tended very far, if some new constituents are discovered, excited baryons: if the total angular momentum for instance at LHC. As stressed by many authors (see, for L increases, it is first shared equally among the 3 instance, [189]), some anomalies in the Higgs branching quarks, but at larger L the third quark takes `y L ratios, and the other recent observations at CERN might while the two first are mainly in a relative s-wave∼ indicate the existence of heavy scalars. Among the many (of course modulo permutations) [186]. possible scenarios, there is the possibility of scalar quarks with colour charge 3, having the same colour-mediated The diquark model becomes a good approxima- interaction as the ordinary quarks, except of course for • tion for the ground state of double-charm baryons spin and statistics. Perhaps the lowest of theses scalars (QQq) provided it is handled and interpreted prop- will live long enough to hadronise, and give rise to new erly, since a part of the QQ interaction comes from hadrons. the third quark. In the case of the harmonic oscil- The lifetime of the hypothetical scalar quarks would lator, with the usual definition of the Jacobi vari- of course be crucial. Remember that for many years the ables x = r 2 r 1 and y = (2 r 3 r 1 r 2)/p3, potential model of charmonium and bottomonium was − P 2 2 − 2 − one notices that ri j = (3/2)(x + y ), so the di- extrapolated towards topomonium. Then it was realised rect QQ interaction x 2 gets a 50% increase from that, when the mass of t quark is too large, its weak decay the light quark. Moreover, the first excitations of becomes too fast for hadronisation to take place [190]. If (QQq) (besides spin) occur with (QQ), so a new di- this is the case for any new super-heavy quark or squark, quark has to be estimated for each level. In fact then the realm of exotic hadrons will remain the privilege + a Born-Oppenheimer treatment à la H2 is more of low-energy hadron physics. appropriate. Let us consider a scenario with heavy scalar quarks of colour 3, as predicted by supersymmetry or any other b. Born–Oppenheimer Along this review, we stressed BSM (Beyond Standard Model) theory. (There are specu- the importance of the Born-Oppenheimer point of view: lations about colour 6 or other gauge groups.) We note the quarkonium potential is just an effective interaction them “squarks” without necessarily endorsing supersym- integrating out the gluon and light-quark degrees of free- metry. Then, one gets squarkonia (ςς¯), and perhaps the dom surrounding a heavy quark and a heavy antiquark; scalar ground state could be responsible for the excess doubly-heavy baryons (QQq) have typically two scales tentatively seen at 750 GeV. See, e.g., [191]. I apologise of energy for its spectrum, the excitation energy of the for the lack of space needed to cite the other ¦ 1000 rele- QQ pair, and the excitation energy of the light quark, vant references, and the lack of expertise to separate the and this comes very naturally in the Born-Oppenheimer really innovative papers from the “ambulance chasing” + treatment, as it does in atomic physics for H2 . opportunities [192]. We also mentioned that hybrid mesons, schematically The lightest charged hadron is likely du for ς = d with ¯ noted (QQg) have been studied by estimating an “excited charge 1/3 or uud of ΛQ type, but spin 0, if ς = u with − 16 charge 2/3. that account for the latest exotics are praised for their The baryon sector becomes entertaining if several inspiration, invited to many workshops and conferences, squarks are put together. For instance (ςςq) has quantum hired in committees, etc., but, when the states disap- numbers (1/2)− as the ςς disquark contains one unit of pear, the same model-builders are pointed out as lacking orbital excitation, to fulfill the Bose statistics. The triply- rigour and corrupting the field. To be honest, it often superexotic (ςςς) requires a fully antisymmetric wave happens that the pioneers have written their predictions function ρ λ, as per Eq. (1) that was proposed 50 rather carefully, with many warnings about the width years ago∝ for× the last member of the N = 2 multiplet of states in the continuum, but that the followers have for light baryons, the so-called [20, 1+] multiplet in the developed the models beyond any reasonable control, notation of, e.g., [193]. Fifty years after the first baryon with tables and tables of states which simply fall part. conference, the physics has evolved, but one uses the For one of the models of multiquarks, a warning was same wave function (besides some scaling). set [196] that only a few states will show up as peaks, the others, being very broad, just paving the contin- uum, but the warning was often forgotten. This Pan- VII. OUTLOOK dora box syndrome affects practically all approaches. For instance, the molecular picture was first focused on one- Exotic hadrons are coming up and down, or back and pion exchange, with strict selection rules, that makes forth if one prefers. For outsiders, there is somewhat a the interaction repulsive in any second channel. With discredit on a field in which many states regularly show the exchange of vector mesons, and the old-fashioned up rapidly and then disappear within a few years, with potentials replaced by effective theories, the molecular many papers hastily written to explain the new hadrons, picture has gained some respectability, but has dramat- and never any deep understanding on why the models ically widened the spectrum of predictions. In the di- fail. quark model, Frederikson and Jandel [197] discussed the This is of course, a superficial view. The truth is that existence of possible dibaryons, and the problem was the experiments are very difficult, due to a low statistics rediscovered recently [198], that the picture of XYZ as for a signal above an intricate background. The situation diquark-antidiquark states probably implies higher con- is even worse for broad resonances. As often stressed figurations. This is why genuinely exotic states, lying [194, 195], the location of the peak might depend on the below their dissociation threshold, will always play a production process and on the final state, so that there is privileged role, and the searches in the sector of double often the question on whether two or more candidates heavy flavour should be given the highest priority. correspond to the same “state”. So far, several mass In any case, the studies on the mechanisms of confine- ranges and flavour sectors have been investigated with al- ment and the resulting nuclear forces should be pursued. ready a few good candidates for exotics such as X (3872). The strong-coupling limit of QCD and lattice simulations The main lesson of the last decades is clearly the richness explain how a linear confinement is developed between of the configurations mixing heavy and light constituents. a quark and an antiquark. It is already more delicate to The hidden-charm sector is already much explored, and understand its extension to baryons, with possible inter- even if the recent discoveries have to be checked, refined play between ∆-shape and Y -shape configurations for and completed, there is clearly an urgent need for inves- the gluon density, and even more speculative to write tigating the double charm and other flavor exotic sectors. down a confining Hamiltonian for multiquarks. What re- Hopefully, there will be an emulation between electron- main to be further investigated, based on the already rich positron machines, proton colliders, heavy-ion collisions literature is how clustering sometimes occur in baryons and intense hadron facilities to develop this program. and higher multiquarks, and how the linear confinement On the theory side, the fundamental approaches such breaks to lead to the actual decay of resonances and as LQCD or QCDSR involve lengthy calculations and the virtual hadron-hadron components, i.e., to operate usually come second, to clarify some predictions. First the matching of the quark dynamics and the long-range appear the speculations based on more empirical models, hadron-hadron interaction. inspired by QCD. In phenomenological QCD, Arx tarpeia Capitoli prox- ima:10 Physicists inventing molecules or quark clusters ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This review benefited from stimulating discussions with my past and present collaborators and with many 10 “The Tarpeian Rock is close to the Capitol”. In ancient Rom, some colleagues. It was completed during a visit at RIKEN, prominent wining generals had a triumph procession, the Fifth- in the framework of a JSPS-CNRS agreement, and fi- Avenue parade of that time, ending to the Capitol Temple, and the worse criminals were plunged to death from the nearby Tarpeian nalised during a visit at ECT*. The hospitality provided Rock. This Latin sentence is probably posterior to the Roman period. by Emiko Hiyama, by Jochen Wambach, and by their I thank the historian François Richard for a correspondence on this colleagues is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also point. due to M. Asghar for very interesting comments on the 17

manuscript.

[1] Emilio Segrè, From X-rays to quarks: modern physicists and ph]. their discoveries (Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1980) trans. [17] Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu, of : Personaggi e scoperte nella fisica contemporanea. Mi- “The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states,” lano : Mondadori, 1976; Abraham Pais, Inward bound: of (2016), 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004, arXiv:1601.02092 matter and forces in the physical world (Clarendon Press, Ox- [hep-ph]. ford, 1986); Vladimir V Ezhela, B B Filimonov, S B Lugov- [18] S. Narison, QCD as a Theory of Hadrons: From Partons to sky, B V Polishchuk, S I Striganov, Y G Stroganov, Betty Confinement, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Armstrong, Richard Michael Barnett, D E Groom, P S Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Gee, Thomas G Trippe, Charles G Wohl, and John David Press, 2004). Jackson, Particle physics, one hundred years of discoveries: an [19] Michael R. Pennington, ed., Proceedings, 16th International annotated chronological bibliography (AIP, New York, NY, Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy (Hadron 2015), Vol. 1735 1996). (2016). [2] G. Breit, “Aspects of Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Theory,” [20] Pedro Bicudo, Stanislav Dubnicka, Francesco Giacosa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 766–812 (1962). Robert Kaminski, and Marina Krstic Marinkovic, eds., [3] G. F. Chew and F. E. Low, “Effective range approach to Proceedings, International Meeting of Excited QCD 2015, the low-energy p wave pion - nucleon interaction,” Phys. Vol. 8 (2015). Rev. 101, 1570–1579 (1956). [21] https://baryons2016.physics.fsu.edu/ [4] Geoffrey Foucar Chew, The analytic S-matrix: a basis for indico/event/0/contributions. + nuclear democracy (Benjamin, New York, NY, 1966). [22] P. Achard et al. (L3), “Measurement of exclusive ρ ρ− [5] James S. Ball, Antonio Scotti, and David Y. Wong, “One- production in mid-virtuality two-photon interactions and ¯ boson-exchange model of NN and N N interaction,” Phys. study of the γγ∗ ρρ process at LEP,” Phys. Lett. B615, Rev. 142, 1000–1012 (1966). 19–30 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0504016→ [hep-ex]; “Measure- [6] K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Parti- ment of exclusive ρ0ρ0 production in two photon colli- cle Physics,” Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014). sions at high Q2 at LEP,” Phys. Lett. B568, 11–22 (2003), [7] L. Montanet, G. C. Rossi, and G. Veneziano, “Baryonium arXiv:hep-ex/0305082 [hep-ex]. physics,” Phys. Rept. 63, 149–222 (1980). [23] I. V. Anikin, B. Pire, and O. V. Teryaev, “Search for isoten-

[8] C. Amsler and N. A. Tornqvist, “Mesons beyond the sor exotic meson and twist-4 contribution to γ∗γ ρρ,” naive quark model,” Phys. Rept. 389, 61–117 (2004). Phys. Lett. B626, 86–94 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506277→ [9] Eberhard Klempt and Alexander Zaitsev, “Glueballs, [hep-ph]. PC + Hybrids, Multiquarks. Experimental facts versus QCD [24] Valery Dorofeev et al. (VES), “The J = 1− hunting inspired concepts,” Phys. Rept. 454, 1–202 (2007), season at VES,” Proceedings, 9th International Conference arXiv:0708.4016 [hep-ph]. on Hadron Spectroscopy (Hadron 2001), AIP Conf. Proc. 619, [10] P. Dalpiaz, R. Klapisch, P. Lefevre, M. Macri, L. Montanet, 143–154 (2002), [,143(2001)], arXiv:hep-ex/0110075 [hep- Dieter Mohl, André Martin, J.-M. Richard, H.J. Pirner, ex]. and L. Tecchio, “Physics at SuperLEAR,” in Les Houches [25] D. R. Thompson et al. (E852), “Evidence for exotic me- Workshop 1987:0414 (1987) p. 0414. son production in the reaction pi- p —> eta pi- p at 18- [11] Claude Amsler et al., “Perspectives in hadron and quark GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1630–1633 (1997), arXiv:hep- dynamics,” Prospects of hadron and quark physics with elec- ex/9705011 [hep-ex]. tromagnetic probes. Proceedings, 2nd ELFE Workshop on [26] M. Alekseev et al. (COMPASS), “Observation of a PC + Hadronic Physics, Saint Malo, France, September 23-27, 1996, J = 1− exotic resonance in diffractive dissociation of + Nucl. Phys. A622, 315C–354C (1997). 190 GeV/c π− into π−π−π ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 241803 [12] D. von Harrach (COMPASS), “The COMPASS experiment (2010), arXiv:0910.5842 [hep-ex]. at CERN,” Quark lepton nuclear physics. Proceedings, Inter- [27] H. Al Ghoul et al. (GlueX), “First Results from The GlueX national Conference, QULEN’97, Osaka, Japan, May 20-23, Experiment,” in 16th International Conference on Hadron 1997, Nucl. Phys. A629, 245C–254C (1998). Spectroscopy (Hadron 2015) Newport News, Virginia, USA, [13] M. Destefanis (PANDA), “The PANDA experiment at September 13-18, 2015 (2015) arXiv:1512.03699 [nucl-ex]. FAIR,” Proceedings, 7th Joint International Hadron Struc- [28] C. A. Meyer and E. S. Swanson, “Hybrid Mesons,” Prog. ture’13 Conference (HS 13), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 245, Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 21–58 (2015), arXiv:1502.07276 [hep- 199–206 (2013). ph]. [14] Eric S. Swanson, “The new heavy mesons: A status re- [29] C. Amsler and C. Hanhart, Non-qq¯ mesons, in [6]. port,” Phys. Rep. 429, 243–405 (2006), hep-ph/0601110. [30] B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), “Observation of a narrow meson + 0 2 [15] Marina Nielsen, Fernando S. Navarra, and Su Houng Lee, decaying to Ds π at a mass of 2.32 GeV/c ,” Phys. Rev. “New Charmonium States in QCD Sum Rules: A Concise Lett. 90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021 [hep-ex]. Review,” Phys.Rept. 497, 41–83 (2010), arXiv:0911.1958 [31] D. Besson et al. (CLEO), “Observation of a narrow reso- 2 0 [hep-ph]. nance of mass 2.46 GeV/c decaying to D +sπ and con- ∗ [16] Christian Hambrock, “Exotic Heavy Quark Spectroscopy: firmation of the DsJ∗ (2317) state,” Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 Theory Interpretation vs. Data,” Proceedings, 14th Interna- (2003), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D75,119908(2007)], arXiv:hep- tional Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines (Beauty ex/0305100 [hep-ex]. 2013), PoS Beauty2013, 044 (2013), arXiv:1306.0695 [hep- [32] S. Godfrey and Nathan Isgur, “Mesons in a Relativized 18

Quark Model with Chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D32, glet state of charmonium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2337–2340 189–231 (1985). (1992). 1 [33] D. Pignon and C. A. Piketty, “Charmed meson spectra,” [44] P. Rubin et al. (CLEO), “Observation of the P1 state of Phys. Lett. B81, 334–338 (1979); Howard J. Schnitzer, charmonium,” Phys. Rev. D72, 092004 (2005), arXiv:hep- “Spin Dependence and Glueball Mixing With θ(1640) ex/0508037 [hep-ex]. in Ordinary Meson Spectroscopy,” Nucl. Phys. B207, [45] S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), “Observation of the ηc (2s) in + 131–156 (1982); Robert N. Cahn and J. David Jackson, exclusive B KKs K−π decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, “Spin-orbit and tensor forces in heavy-quark light-quark 102001 (2002),→ [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.89,129901(2002)], mesons: Implications of the new Ds state at 2.32 GeV,” arXiv:hep-ex/0206002 [hep-ex]. Phys. Rev. D68, 037502 (2003), hep-ph/0305012; Takayuki [46] S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), “Observation of a new narrow + Matsuki, Toshiyuki Morii, and Kazutaka Sudoh, “New charmonium state in exclusive B± K±π π−J/ψ de- heavy-light mesons Qq¯,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 117, 1077– cays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003),→ hep-ex/0309032. 1098 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0605019 [hep-ph]. [47] Richard F. Lebed, “Exotic Discoveries in Familiar Places: [34] M. Nielsen, Ricardo D’Elia Matheus, F. S. Navarra, and Theory of the Onia and Exotics,” (2016) 16th International + M. E. Bracco, “Testing the nature of the DsJ (2317) and Conference on B-Physics at Frontier Machines (Beauty X (3782) states using QCD sum rules,” Proceedings, 18th 2016), 2-6 May 2016. Marseille, France, to appear in PoS, International IUPAP Conference on Few-body problems in arXiv:1605.07975 [hep-ph]. physics (FB18), Nucl. Phys. A790, 526–529 (2007); J. Vi- [48] B. Aubert et al. (BABAR), “Observation of a broad struc- + 2 jande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, “The puzzle of ture in the π π−J/ψ mass spectrum around 4.26 GeV/c ,” the D and Ds mesons,” Quarks and nuclear physics. Pro- Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005), hep-ex/0506081. ceedings, 4th International Conference, QNP 2006, Madrid, [49] S.K. Choi et al. (BELLE Collaboration), “Observation of a

Spain, June 5-10, 2006, Eur. Phys. J. A31, 722–724 (2007); resonance-like structure in the π±ψ0 mass distribution in Jorge Segovia, David R. Entem, and Francisco Fernandez, exclusive B Kπ±ψ0 decays,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 100, 142001 “Charmed-strange Meson Spectrum: Old and New Prob- (2008), arXiv:0708.1790→ [hep-ex]. lems,” Phys. Rev. D91, 094020 (2015), arXiv:1502.03827 [50] Kazuo Abe et al. (Belle), “Observation of a new charmo- + [hep-ph]; Stephen Godfrey and Kenneth Moats, “Proper- nium state in double charmonium production in e e− an- ties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons,” Phys. nihilation at ps 10.6 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 082001 Rev. D93, 034035 (2016), arXiv:1510.08305 [hep-ph]. (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0507019∼ [hep-ex]; P. Pakhlov et al. [35] C. B. Dover and S. H. Kahana, “Possibility of Charmed (Belle), “Production of New Charmoniumlike States in + ( ) ¯ ( ) Hypernuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1506–1509 (1977); C. B. e e− J/ψD ∗ D ∗ at ps 10 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, Dover, S. H. Kahana, and T. L. Trueman, “Bound States 202001→ (2008), arXiv:0708.3812∼ [hep-ex].

of Charmed Baryons and anti-Baryons,” Phys. Rev. D16, [51] S. Uehara et al. (Belle), “Observation of a χ20 candidate 799–815 (1977). in γγ DD¯ production at BELLE,” Phys. Rev. Lett. [36] Nathan Isgur and Harry J. Lipkin, “On the possible exis- 96, 082003→ (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0512035 [hep-ex]; “Ob- tence of stable four quark scalar mesons with charm and servation of a charmonium-like enhancement in the strangeness,” Phys. Lett. B99, 151 (1981). γγ ωJ/ψ process,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 092001 (2010), [37] Sungtae Cho et al. (ExHIC), “Multi-quark hadrons from arXiv:0912.4451→ [hep-ex]; C. P. Shen et al. (Belle), “Evi- Heavy Ion Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 212001 dence for a new resonance and search for the Y (4140) (2011), arXiv:1011.0852 [nucl-th]; Chen Yu-qi and in the γγ φJ/ψ process,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 112004 Wu Su-zhi, “Production of four-quark states with double (2010), arXiv:0912.2383→ [hep-ex]. heavy quarks at LHC,” Phys. Lett. B705, 93–97 (2011), [52] G. Pakhlova et al. (Belle), “Observation of a near- + + ¯ arXiv:1101.4568 [hep-ph]. threshold enhancement in the e e− Λc Λ−c cross section [38] Tetsuo Hyodo, Yan-Rui Liu, Makoto Oka, Kazutaka using initial-state radiation,” Phys.→ Rev. Lett. 101, 172001 Sudoh, and Shigehiro Yasui, “Production of doubly (2008), arXiv:0807.4458 [hep-ex]. charmed tetraquarks with exotic color configurations [53] Jacob Sonnenschein and Dorin Weissman, “A tetraquark in electron-positron collisions,” (2012), arXiv:1209.6207 or not a tetraquark: A holography inspired stringy [hep-ph]. hadron (HISH) perspective,” (2016), arXiv:1606.02732 [39] A. Esposito, M. Papinutto, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, and [hep-ph]. N. Tantalo, “Doubly charmed tetraquarks in Bc and Ξbc [54] Feng-Kun Guo, Johann Haidenbauer, Christoph Hanhart, decays,” Phys. Rev. D88, 054029 (2013), arXiv:1307.2873 and Ulf-G. Meissner, “Reconciling the X(4630) with the [hep-ph]. Y(4660),” Phys. Rev. D82, 094008 (2010), arXiv:1005.2055 [40] Kazuo Abe et al. (Belle), “Study of double charmonium [hep-ph]. production in e+ e- annihilation at ps 10.6 GeV,” Phys. [55] Bernard Aubert et al. (BaBar), “Search for a charged part- ∼ Rev. D70, 071102 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0407009 [hep-ex]. ner of the X(3872) in the B meson decay B X −K, X − 0 → → [41] A. Martin and J. M. Richard, “The eventful story of char- J/ψπ−π ,” Phys. Rev. D71, 031501 (2005), arXiv:hep- monium singlet states,” CERN Cour. 43N3, 17–18 (2003); ex/0412051 [hep-ex]. T. Barnes and S. L. Olsen, “Charmonium spectroscopy,” [56] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), “Observation of a + + Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24S1, 305–325 (2009). charged charmoniumlike structure in e e− π π−J/ψ [42] C. Baglin et al. (R704, Annecy(LAPP)-CERN-Genoa-Lyon- at ps = 4.26 GeV,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 252001→ (2013), Oslo-Rome-Strasbourg-Turin), “Search for the p Wave arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]; Z.Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collabo- + + Singlet Charmonium State in ¯pp Annihilations at the ration), “Study of e e− π π−J/ψ and Observation of CERN Intersecting Storage Rings,” Phys. Lett. B171, 135– a Charged Charmonium-like→ State at Belle,” 110, 252002 141 (1986). (2013), arXiv:1304.0121 [hep-ex]. [43] T. A. Armstrong et al., “Observation of the p wave sin- [57] T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, and Kamal K. Seth, “Ob- 19

servation of the Charged Hadron Zc±(3900) and Evidence [74] C. G. Wohl, Pentaquarks, in [199] (2008); Kenneth H. 0 + for the Neutral Zc (3900) in e e− ππJ/ψ at ps = 4170 Hicks, “On the conundrum of the pentaquark,” Eur. Phys. MeV,” Phys. Lett. B727, 366–370→ (2013), arXiv:1304.3036 J. H37, 1–31 (2012). [hep-ex]. [75] Abdullah Shams Bin Tariq, “Revisiting the pentaquark [58] Frank Nerling (COMPASS), “Highlights from the COM- episode for lattice QCD,” Proceedings, 25th International PASS experiment at CERN – Hadron spectroscopy and Symposium on Lattice field theory (Lattice 2007), PoS excitations,” in 4th International Conference on New Fron- LAT2007, 136 (2007), arXiv:0711.0566 [hep-lat]. tiers in Physics (ICNFP 2015) Kolymbari, Greece, August [76] R. L. Jaffe, “The width of the Theta+ exotic baryon in the 23-30, 2015 (2016) arXiv:1601.05025 [hep-ex]. chiral soliton model,” Eur. Phys. J. C35, 221–222 (2004), [59] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Observation of J/ψφ structures arXiv:hep-ph/0401187 [hep-ph]; H. Weigel, “Axial cur- consistent with exotic states from amplitude analysis of rent matrix elements and pentaquark decay widths in B+ J/ψφK+ decays,” (2016), arXiv:1606.07895 [hep- chiral soliton models,” Phys. Rev. D75, 114018 (2007), ex];→ Fl. Stancu, “Can Y (4140) be a c¯cs¯s tetraquark?” J. arXiv:hep-ph/0703072 [hep-ph]. Phys. G37, 075017 (2010), arXiv:0906.2485 [hep-ph]. [77] V. M. Abazov et al. (D0), “Observation of the doubly

[60] H. Høgåsen, J.-M. Richard, and P. Sorba, “A chromomag- strange b baryon Ω−b ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 232002 (2008), netic mechanism for the X(3872) resonance,” Phys. Rev. arXiv:0808.4142 [hep-ex]; T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF), “Ob-

D73, 054013 (2006), hep-ph/0511039. servation of the Ω−b and Measurement of the Proper- [61] V. Crede and W. Roberts, “Progress towards understand- ties of the Ξ−b and Ω−b ,” Phys. Rev. D80, 072003 (2009), ing baryon resonances,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 76, 076301 arXiv:0905.3123 [hep-ex]; R Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Measure- 0 (2013), arXiv:1302.7299 [nucl-ex]. ment of the Λb, Ξ−b and Ω−b baryon masses,” Phys. Rev. [62] Nathan Isgur, “An introduction to the quark model for Lett. 110, 182001 (2013), arXiv:1302.1072 [hep-ex]. baryons,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E1, 465–490 (1992). [78] Claude Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of [63] R. H. Dalitz and S. F. Tuan, “The phenomenological de- Particle Physics,” Phys. Lett. B667, 1–1340 (2008). scription of K-nucleon reaction processes,” Annals Phys. [79] Yubing Dong, Amand Faessler, Thomas Gutsche, S. Ku- 10, 307–351 (1960). mano, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij, “Strong three-body + [64] Eulogio Oset, in [21]. decays of Λc (2940) ,” Phys. Rev. D83, 094005 (2011), [65] Nathan Isgur and Gabriel Karl, “P-Wave Baryons in the arXiv:1103.4762 [hep-ph].

Quark Model,” Phys. Rev. D18, 4187 (1978). [80] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Observation of two new Ξ−b [66] Yuki Kamiya, Kenta Miyahara, Shota Ohnishi, Yoichi baryon resonances,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 062004 (2015), Ikeda, Tetsuo Hyodo, Eulogio Oset, and Wolfram arXiv:1411.4849 [hep-ex]; “Measurement of the proper- 0 Weise, “Antikaon-nucleon interaction and Λ(1405) in chi- ties of the Ξ∗b baryon,” (2016), arXiv:1604.03896 [hep-ex]. ral SU(3) dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. A954, 41–57 (2016), [81] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and A. P. Marty- arXiv:1602.08852 [hep-ph]. nenko, “Mass spectra of doubly heavy baryons in the [67] Frank E. Close, “Light hadron spectroscopy: Theory and relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D66, 014008 (2002), experiment,” Lepton and photon interactions at high energies. arXiv:hep-ph/0201217 [hep-ph]. Proceedings, 20th International Symposium, LP 2001, Rome, [82] S. Fleck and J. M. Richard, “Baryons with double charm,” Italy, July 23-28, 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17, 3239–3258 Prog. Theor. Phys. 82, 760–774 (1989). (2002), [,327(2001)], arXiv:hep-ph/0110081 [hep-ph]. [83] M. Mattson et al. (SELEX), “First observation of the dou- + [68] A. A. Carter, “Evidence for an S = +1, I = 0 Resonance bly charmed baryon Ξcc ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 112001 in the K+-Nucleon System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 801–803 (2002), hep-ex/0208014; A. Ocherashvili et al. (SELEX), + + (1967); A. T. Lea, B. R. Martin, and G. C. Oades, “K p “Confirmation of the double charm baryon Ξcc (3520) via + phase-shift analysis below 1500 MeV/c,” Phys. Rev. 165, its decay to pD K−,” Phys. Lett. B628, 18–24 (2005), hep- 1770–1786 (1968); B. C. Wilson et al., “Phase-shift analysis ex/0406033. of the K+-nucleon interaction in the I = 0 state up to [84] S. P. Ratti, “New results on c-baryons and a search for cc- 1.5 GeV/c,” Nucl. Phys. B42, 445–453 (1972). baryons in FOCUS,” Proceedings, 5th International Confer- [69] M. G. Albrow, S. Andersson-Almehed, B. Bosnjakovic, ence on Hyperons, charm and beauty hadrons (BEACH 2002), C. Daum, F. C. Erne, Y. Kimura, J. P. Lagnaux, J. C. Sens, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 115, 33–36 (2003), [,33(2003)]; F. Udo, and F. Wagner, “Elastic scattering of positive Bernard Aubert et al. (BaBar), “Search for doubly charmed + ++ kaons on polarized protons between 0.87 and 2.74 Gev/c. baryons Ξcc and Ξcc in BaBar,” Phys. Rev. D74, 011103 Results and phase-shift analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B30, 273– (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0605075 [hep-ex]; Y. Kato et al. 305 (1971). (Belle), “Search for doubly charmed baryons and study [70] B. R. Martin, “Kaon-Nucleon Partial Wave Amplitudes of charmed strange baryons at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D89, Below 1.5 GeV/c for I = 0 and 1,” Nucl. Phys. B94, 413– 052003 (2014), arXiv:1312.1026 [hep-ex]; R Aaij et al. + 430 (1975). (LHCb), “Search for the doubly charmed baryon Ξcc ,” [71] R. L. Kelly et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle JHEP 12, 090 (2013), arXiv:1310.2538 [hep-ex]. Properties. Particle Data Group,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, S1– [85] Stanley Brodsky, Guy de Teramond, and Marek Karliner, S286 (1980). “Puzzles in Hadronic Physics and Novel Quantum Chro- [72] T. Nakano et al. (LEPS), “Evidence for Narrow S = +1 modynamics Phenomenology,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. Baryon Resonance in Photo- production from Neutron,” 62, 1–35 (2012), [Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.62,2082(2011)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0301020. arXiv:1302.5684 [hep-ph]; Marek Karliner and Jonathan L. [73] Dmitri Diakonov, Victor Petrov, and Maxim V. Polyakov, Rosner, “Baryons with two heavy quarks: Masses, pro- “Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons: Prediction from chi- duction, decays, and detection,” Phys. Rev. D90, 094007 ral solitons,” Z. Phys. A359, 305–314 (1997), arXiv:hep- (2014), arXiv:1408.5877 [hep-ph]. ph/9703373. [86] Boris A. Gelman and Shmuel Nussinov, “Does a narrow 20

¯ tetraquark (ccu¯d) state exist?” Phys. Lett. B551, 296–304 Photo-Production of J/ψ at Threshold in Hall C at Jeffer- (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0209095 [hep-ph]; Thomas D. Co- son Lab,” (2016), arXiv:1609.00676 [hep-ex]. hen and Paul M. Hohler, “Doubly heavy hadrons and the [100] Paul Mattione, in [21]. domain of validity of doubly heavy diquark-anti-quark [101] Richard A. Arndt, John S. Hyslop, III, and L. David Roper, symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D74, 094003 (2006), arXiv:hep- “Nucleon-Nucleon Partial Wave Analysis to 1100 MeV,” ph/0606084 [hep-ph]. Phys. Rev. D35, 128 (1987); Richard A. Arndt, Igor I. [87] C. Gignoux, B. Silvestre-Brac, and J. M. Richard, “Possi- Strakovsky, Ron L. Workman, and David V. Bugg, bility of Stable Multi - Quark Baryons,” Phys. Lett. B193, “Analysis of the reaction π+d pp to 500 MeV,” Phys. 323 (1987); Harry J. Lipkin, “New Possibilities for Ex- Rev. C48, 1926–1938 (1993); Richard→ A. Arndt, Igor I. otic Hadrons: Anticharmed Strange Baryons,” Phys. Lett. Strakovsky, and Ron L. Workman, “Analysis of πd elas- B195, 484 (1987). tic scattering data to 500 MeV,” Phys. Rev. C50, 1796–1806 [88] E. M. Aitala et al. (E791), “Search for the pentaquark (1994), arXiv:nucl-th/9407032 [nucl-th]; B. Tatischeff et al., 0 via the P (¯cs) decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 44–48 (1998), “Evidence for narrow dibaryons at 2050 MeV, 2122 MeV, arXiv:hep-ex/9709013 [hep-ex]; “Search for the pen- and 2150 MeV observed in inelastic pp scattering,” Phys. 0 0, taquark via the P (¯cs) K ∗K− p decay,” Phys. Lett. B448, Rev. C59, 1878–1889 (1999). 303–310 (1999). → [102] B. Parker, Kamal K. Seth, C. M. Ginsburg, B. O’Reilly, [89] A. Aktas et al. (H1), “Evidence for a narrow anti-charmed and M. Sarmiento, “Search for a T = 2 Dibaryon,” Phys. baryon state,” Phys. Lett. B588, 17 (2004), arXiv:hep- Rev. Lett. 63, 1570 (1989). ex/0403017 [hep-ex]. [103] F. W. N. De Boer et al., “Search for bound states of neu- [90] S. Chekanov et al. (ZEUS), “Search for a narrow charmed trons and negative pions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 423–426

baryonic state decaying to D∗± p∓ in ep collisions at (1984). HERA,” Eur. Phys. J. C38, 29–41 (2004), arXiv:hep- [104] P. Adlarson et al. (WASA-at-COSY), “Evidence for a ex/0409033 [hep-ex]. New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scatter- [91] Bernard Aubert et al. (BaBar), “Search for the charmed ing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 202301 (2014), arXiv:1402.6844 + pentaquark candidate Θc (3100) in e e− annihilations [nucl-ex]; “Neutron-proton scattering in the context of at ps = 10.58 GeV,” Phys. Rev. D73, 091101 (2006), the d* (2380) resonance,” Phys. Rev. C90, 035204 (2014), arXiv:hep-ex/0604006 [hep-ex]. arXiv:1408.4928 [nucl-ex]. [92] G Baum, J Kyynäräinen, and A Tripet (NA58 Collabora- [105] J. Terrance Goldman, Kim Maltman, G. J. Stephenson, tion), COMPASS: a proposal for a common muon and proton Jr., K. E. Schmidt, and Fan Wang, “An ’inevitable’ non- apparatus for structure and spectroscopy, Tech. Rep. CERN- strange dibaryon,” Phys. Rev. C39, 1889–1895 (1989). SPSLC-96-14. SPSLC-P-297 (CERN, Geneva, 1996). [106] Shota Ohnishi, Yoichi Ikeda, Hiroyuki Kamano, and [93] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Observation of J/ψp Res- Toru Sato, “Signature of strange dibaryon in kaon- 0 onances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λb induced reaction,” Proceedings, 5th Asia-Pacific Confer- → J/ψK− p Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015), ence on Few-Body Problems in Physics 2011 (APFB2011), arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]. Few Body Syst. 54, 347–351 (2013), arXiv:1109.4724 [nucl- [94] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Model-independent evidence th]; T. Hashimoto et al. (J-PARC E15), “Search for 0 for J/ψp contributions to Λb J/ψpK− decays,” (2016), the deeply bound K− pp state from the semi-inclusive → arXiv:1604.05708 [hep-ex]. forward-neutron spectrum in the in-flight K− reaction on 0 3 [95] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Observation of the Λb J/ψpπ− He,” PTEP 2015, 061D01 (2014), arXiv:1408.5637 [nucl- decay,” JHEP 07, 103 (2014), arXiv:1406.0755 [hep-ex].→ ex]. + + [96] T. J. Burns, “Phenomenology of Pc (4380) ,Pc (4450) [107] Y.B. Zel’dovich, “Energy levels in a distorted Coulomb and related states,” Eur. Phys. J. A51, 152 (2015), Field,” Soviet Physics-Solid State 1, 1497–1501 (1960); arXiv:1509.02460 [hep-ph]. A. Gal, E. Friedman, and C. J. Batty, “On the interplay [97] En Wang, Hua-Xing Chen, Li-Sheng Geng, De-Min Li, between Coulomb and nuclear states in exotic atoms,” and Eulogio Oset, “A hidden-charm pentaquark state Nucl. Phys. A606, 283–291 (1996); Monique Combescure, 0 in Λb J/ψpπ− decay,” Phys. Rev. D93, 094001 (2016), Avinash Khare, Ashok Raina, Jean-Marc Richard, and arXiv:1512.01959→ [hep-ph]. Carole Weydert, “Level rearrangement in exotic atoms [98] Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Evidence for exotic hadron and quantum dots,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B21, 3765–3781 0 contributions to Λb J/ψpπ− decays,” Phys. Rev. (2007), arXiv:cond-mat/0701006 [cond-mat]. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016),→ [Addendum: Phys. Rev. [108] Robert L. Jaffe, “Perhaps a Stable Dihyperon,” Phys. Lett.117,no.10,109902(2016)], arXiv:1606.06999 [hep-ex]. Rev. Lett. 38, 195–198 (1977), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. [99] V. Kubarovsky and M. B. Voloshin, “Formation of Lett.38,617(1977)]. hidden-charm pentaquarks in photon-nucleon collisions,” [109] R. H. Dalitz, D. H. Davis, P. H. Fowler, A. Montwill, Phys. Rev. D92, 031502 (2015), arXiv:1508.00888 [hep-ph]; J. Pniewski, and Janusz Andrzej Zakrzewski, “The Iden- “Search for Hidden-Charm Pentaquark with CLAS12,” tified ΛΛ Hypernuclei and the Predicted H Particle,” Proc. (2016), arXiv:1609.00050 [hep-ph]; A. N. Hiller Blin, Roy. Soc. Lond. A426, 1–17 (1989). C. Fernández-Ramírez, A. Jackura, V. Mathieu, V. I. Mo- [110] C. Kuhn, B. Hippolyte, J. P. Coffin, J. Baudot, I. Be- keev, A. Pilloni, and A. P. Szczepaniak, “Studying the likov, D. Dietrich, M. Germain, and C. Suire, “Search for Pc (4450) resonance in J/ψ photoproduction off protons,” strange dibaryons in STAR and ALICE,” Strange quarks in Phys. Rev. D94, 034002 (2016), arXiv:1606.08912 [hep-ph]; matter. Proceedings, 6th International Conference, SQM 2001, Marek Karliner and Jonathan L. Rosner, “Photoproduc- Frankfurt, Germany, September 24-29, 2001, J. Phys. G28, tion of Exotic Baryon Resonances,” Phys. Lett. B752, 329– 1707–1714 (2002). 332 (2016), arXiv:1508.01496 [hep-ph]; Z. E. Meziani et al., [111] J. Terrance Goldman, Kim Maltman, G. J. Stephenson, “A Search for the LHCb Charmed ’Pentaquark’ using Jr., K. E. Schmidt, and Fan Wang, “Strangeness 3 − 21

dibaryons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 627 (1987); Hongxia [121] R. L. Jaffe, “Q2Q¯2 Resonances in the Baryon - Antibaryon Huang, Jialun Ping, and Fan Wang, “Further study of System,” Phys. Rev. D17, 1444 (1978). the NΩ dibaryon within constituent quark models,” Phys. [122] Hong-Mo Chan, M. Fukugita, T. H. Hansson, H. J. Hoff- Rev. C92, 065202 (2015), arXiv:1507.07124 [hep-ph]. man, K. Konishi, H. Høgåsen, and Sheung Tsun Tsou, [112] L. H. Thomas, “The Interaction Between a Neutron “Color Chemistry: A Study of Metastable Multi - Quark and a Proton and the Structure of 3H,” Phys. Rev. 47, Molecules,” Phys. Lett. B76, 634–640 (1978). 903–909 (1935); M. V. Zhukov, B. V. Danilin, D. V. [123] E. Fermi and Chen-Ning Yang, “Are mesons elementary Fedorov, J. M. Bang, I. J. Thompson, and J. S. Vaagen, particles?” Phys. Rev. 76, 1739–1743 (1949). “Bound state properties of Borromean Halo nuclei: [124] I. S. Shapiro, “The Physics of Nucleon - anti-Nucleon Sys- 6He and 11Li,” Phys. Rept. 231, 151–199 (1993); Jean- tems,” Phys. Rept. 35, 129–185 (1978); W.W. Buck, C.B. Marc Richard, “Borromean binding,” (2003), http: Dover, and J.-M. Richard, “The Interaction of Nucleons //theor.jinr.ru/Few-body/Belyaev-70/, with anti-Nucleons. 1. General Features of the NN¯ Spec- arXiv:nucl-th/0305076 [nucl-th]. trum in Potential Models,” Annals Phys. 121, 47 (1979). [113] Emiko Hiyama, “Few-body aspects of hypernuclear [125] M. B. Voloshin and L. B. Okun, “Hadron molecules physics,” Few Body Syst. 53, 189–236 (2012); I. N. Filikhin and charmonium atom,” JETP Lett. 23, 333–336 (1976); and A. Gal, “Light ΛΛ hypernuclei and the onset of sta- A. De Rujula, Howard Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, “Molec- bility for ΛΞ hypernuclei,” Phys. Rev. C65, 041001 (2002), ular charmonium: a new spectroscopy?” Phys. Rev. Lett. arXiv:nucl-th/0110008 [nucl-th]; H. Garcilazo, A. Val- 38, 317 (1977). carce, and T. F. Carames, “The NΛΛ ΞNN bound state [126] A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, problem with NΛΣ and NΣΣ channels,”− J. Phys. G42, “Strong decays of ψ(4.028) as a radial excitation of char- 025103 (2015); Jean-Marc Richard, Qian Wang, and Qiang monium,” Phys. Lett. B71, 397 (1977); “Why is ψ000(4.414) Zhao, “Lightest neutral hypernuclei with strangeness 1 so narrow?” B72, 57 (1977); E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, and 2,” Phys. Rev. C91, 014003 (2015), arXiv:1404.3473− T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and Tung-Mow Yan, “Char- [nucl-th].− monium: Comparison with Experiment,” Phys. Rev. D21, [114] H. Garcilazo, A. Valcarce, and J. Vijande, “Maximal 203 (1980). isospin few-body systems of nucleons and Ξ hyperons,” [127] Nils A. Törnqvist, “Possible large deuteron - like meson Phys. Rev. C94, 024002 (2016), arXiv:1608.05192 [nucl-th]. meson states bound by pions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 556– [115] J. Carbonell, R. Lazauskas, D. Delande, L. Hilico, and 559 (1991). + S. Kiliç, “A new vibrational level of the H2 molecu- [128] Aneesh V. Manohar and Mark B. Wise, “Exotic QQq¯q¯ lar ion,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 64, 316–322 (2003), states in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B399, 17–33 (1993), hep- physics/0207007; K. Varga, J. Usukura, and Y. Suzuki, ph/9212236. “Second Bound State of the Positronium Molecule and [129] Torleif E. O. Ericson and G. Karl, “Strength of pion ex- Biexcitons,” Physical Review Letters 80, 1876–1879 (1998), change in hadronic molecules,” Phys. Lett. B309, 426–430 cond-mat/9802261; A. Czarnecki, “Positronium and Poly- (1993). electrons,” Nuclear Physics A 827, 541–543c (2009); J.-M. [130] Nils A. Törnqvist, “From the deuteron to deusons, an Richard, “Critically bound four-body molecules,” Phys. analysis of deuteron - like meson meson bound states,” Z. Rev. A 67, 034702 (2003), physics/0302004. Phys. C61, 525–537 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9310247 [hep- [116] D. P. Roy, “History of exotic meson (4-quark) and baryon ph]. (5-quark) states,” J. Phys. G30, R113 (2004), arXiv:hep- [131] J. Ferretti, G. Galatà, and E. Santopinto, “Interpretation of ph/0311207. the X(3872) as a charmonium state plus an extra compo- [117] Jonathan L. Rosner, “Possibility of baryon - anti-baryon nent due to the coupling to the meson-meson continuum,” enhancements with unusual quantum numbers,” Phys. Phys. Rev. C88, 015207 (2013), arXiv:1302.6857 [hep-ph]; Rev. Lett. 21, 950–952 (1968). C. E. Thomas and F. E. Close, “Is X(3872) a molecule?” [118] Giancarlo Rossi and Gabriele Veneziano, “The string- Phys. Rev. D78, 034007 (2008), arXiv:0805.3653 [hep-ph]; junction picture of multiquark states: an update,” JHEP Shunsuke Ohkoda, Yasuhiro Yamaguchi, Shigehiro Yasui, 06, 041 (2016), arXiv:1603.05830 [hep-th]. Kazutaka Sudoh, and Atsushi Hosaka, “Exotic Mesons [119] X. Artru, “String model with baryons: Topology, classi- with Hidden Bottom near Thresholds,” Phys. Rev. D86, cal motion,” Nucl. Phys. B85, 442 (1975); Hans Gunter 014004 (2012), arXiv:1111.2921 [hep-ph]; Martin Cleven, Dosch and V. F. Muller, “On composite hadrons in non- Feng-Kun Guo, Christoph Hanhart, Qian Wang, and abelian lattice gauge theories,” B116, 470 (1976); P. Hasen- Qiang Zhao, “Employing spin symmetry to disentangle fratz, R. R. Horgan, J. Kuti, and J. M. Richard, “Heavy different models for the XYZ states,” Phys. Rev. D92, Baryon Spectroscopy in the QCD Bag Model,” Phys. Lett. 014005 (2015), arXiv:1505.01771 [hep-ph]. B94, 401–404 (1980); J. Carlson, John B. Kogut, and V. R. [132] Julian Hofmann and Matthias F. M. Lutz, “Coupled- Pandharipande, “A quark model for baryons based on channel study of baryon resonances with charm,” in quantum chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D27, 233 (1983); Proceedings, 11th International Conference on Hadron spec- E. Bagan, J. I. Latorre, S. P. Merkurev, and R. Tarrach, troscopy (Hadron 2005) (2005) arXiv:nucl-th/0510091 [nucl- “The baryon loop tension from continuum QCD,” Phys. th]. Lett. B158, 145 (1985); M. Fabre de la Ripelle and M. Las- [133] J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, “Coupled-channel study saut, “Transformation of a three-body interaction into of crypto-exotic baryons with charm,” Nucl. Phys. A763, a sum of pairwise potentials: Application to the quark- 90–139 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0507071 [hep-ph]. string- junction and the Urbana potentials,” Few Body [134] C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, “Combining heavy Syst. 23, 75–86 (1997). quark spin and local hidden gauge symmetries in the [120] C. Evangelista et al., “Evidence for a Narrow Width Boson dynamical generation of hidden charm baryons,” Phys. of Mass 2.95 GeV,” Phys. Lett. B72, 139 (1977). Rev. D88, 056012 (2013), arXiv:1304.5368 [hep-ph]. 22

[135] Zhong-Cheng Yang, Zhi-Feng Sun, Jun He, Xiang Liu, 299 (1980). and Shi-Lin Zhu, “The possible hidden-charm molecular [148] Jeffrey E. Mandula, “Quark - Anti-quark - Gluon Exotic baryons composed of anti-charmed meson and charmed Fields for Lattice QCD,” Phys. Lett. B135, 155–158 (1984); baryon,” Chin. Phys. C36, 6–13 (2012), arXiv:1105.2901 K. Jimmy Juge, Julius Kuti, and Colin Morningstar, “The [hep-ph]. heavy-quark hybrid meson spectrum in lattice qcd,” AIP [136] L. G. Landsberg, “Do the narrow cryptoexotic baryon res- Conf. Proc. 688, 193–207 (2004), nucl-th/0307116. onances exist?” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 57, 2127–2131 (1994), [149] Matthias Berwein, Nora Brambilla, Jaume Tarrús Castellà, [Yad. Fiz.57N12,2210(1994)]. and Antonio Vairo, “Quarkonium Hybrids with Nonrela- [137] Cheuk-Yin Wong, “Molecular states of heavy quark tivistic Effective Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D92, 114019 mesons,” Phys. Rev. C69, 055202 (2004), arXiv:hep- (2015), arXiv:1510.04299 [hep-ph]. ph/0311088 [hep-ph]; S. Ohkoda, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, [150] Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Za- K. Sudoh, and A. Hosaka, “Exotic mesons with double kharov, “QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foun- charm and bottom flavor,” Phys. Rev. D86, 034019 (2012), dations,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 385–447 (1979); “QCD and arXiv:1202.0760 [hep-ph]. Resonance Physics: Applications,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 448– [138] Marek Karliner and Jonathan L. Rosner, “New Exotic 518 (1979); “QCD and Resonance Physics. The rho-omega Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Mixing,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 519–534 (1979). Hadronic Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 122001 (2015), [151] R. D. Matheus, S. Narison, M. Nielsen, and J. M. Richard, arXiv:1506.06386 [hep-ph]. “Can the X (3872) be a 1++ four-quark state?” Phys. Rev. [139] Shigehiro Yasui and Kazutaka Sudoh, “Exotic nuclei D75, 014005 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608297; Hua-Xing with open heavy flavor mesons,” Phys. Rev. D80, 034008 Chen, Xiang Liu, Atsushi Hosaka, and Shi-Lin Zhu, “The (2009), arXiv:0906.1452 [hep-ph]. Y(2175) State in the QCD Sum Rule,” Phys. Rev. D78, [140] F. Froemel, B. Julia-Diaz, and D. O. Riska, “Bound states 034012 (2008), arXiv:0801.4603 [hep-ph]. of double flavor hyperons,” Nucl. Phys. A750, 337–356 [152] Stephan Narison, Fernando S. Navarra, and Ma- (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0410034 [nucl-th]; Yan-Rui Liu and rina Nielsen, “Investigating different structures for the Makoto Oka, “Λc N bound states revisited,” Phys. Rev. X (3872),” Proceedings, 15th High-Energy Physics Inter- D85, 014015 (2012), arXiv:1103.4624 [hep-ph]; Waka- national Conference on Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD fumi Meguro, Yan-Rui Liu, and Makoto Oka, “Possi- 10), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 207-208, 249–252 (2010), ble Λc Λc molecular bound state,” Phys. Lett. B704, 547– arXiv:1007.4575 [hep-ph]. 550 (2011), arXiv:1105.3693 [hep-ph]; Hongxia Huang, [153] Carleton DeTar, “LQCD: Flavor Physics and Spec- Jialun Ping, and Fan Wang, “Possible H-like dibaryon troscopy,” (2015), Lepton-Photon 2015, Ljubljana, Slove- states with heavy quarks,” Phys. Rev. C89, 035201 (2014), nia, to appear in PoS, arXiv:1511.06884 [hep-lat]. arXiv:1311.4732 [hep-ph]; Ning Lee, Zhi-Gang Luo, Xiao- [154] H. R. Fiebig, K. Rabitsch, H. Markum, and A. Mihaly, Lin Chen, and Shi-Lin Zhu, “Possible Deuteron-like “Exploring the π+π+ interaction in lattice qcd,” Few Body Molecular States Composed of Heavy Baryons,” Phys. Syst. 29, 95–120 (2000), hep-lat/9906002; Takashi Inoue Rev. D84, 014031 (2011), arXiv:1104.4257 [hep-ph]; Ning et al. (HAL QCD), “Bound H-dibaryon in Flavor SU(3) Li and Shi-Lin Zhu, “Hadronic Molecular States Com- Limit of Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 162002 (2011), posed of Heavy Flavor Baryons,” Phys. Rev. D86, 014020 arXiv:1012.5928 [hep-lat]; S. R. Beane et al. (NPLQCD), (2012), arXiv:1204.3364 [hep-ph]. “Evidence for a Bound H-dibaryon from Lattice QCD,” [141] B. Julia-Diaz and D. O. Riska, “Nuclei of double charm Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 162001 (2011), arXiv:1012.3812 [hep- hyperons,” The structure of baryons. Proceedings, 10th Inter- lat]; H. Suganuma, T. Iritani, F. Okiharu, T. T. Takahashi, national Conference, Baryons’04, Palaiseau, France, October and A. Yamamoto, “Lattice QCD Study for Confine- 25-29, 2004, Nucl. Phys. A755, 431–434 (2005), arXiv:nucl- ment in Hadrons,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1388, 195–201 (2011), th/0405061 [nucl-th]. arXiv:1103.4015 [hep-lat]; Sinya Aoki, Takumi Doi, Tet- [142] L. Van Hove, “Future prospects of particle physics,” in suo Hatsuda, Yoichi Ikeda, Takashi Inoue, Noriyoshi Ishii, 7th European Symposium on Nucleon Antinucleon Interac- Keiko Murano, Hidekatsu Nemura, and Kenji Sasaki tions: Antiproton 86, Thessaloniki, Greece, September 1-5, (HAL QCD), “Lattice QCD approach to Nuclear Physics,” 1986 (1986). PTEP 2012, 01A105 (2012), arXiv:1206.5088 [hep-lat]; Jo- [143] Wolfgang Ochs, “The Status of Glueballs,” J. Phys. G40, hannes Kirscher, Nir Barnea, Doron Gazit, Francesco Ped- 043001 (2013), arXiv:1301.5183 [hep-ph]. eriva, and Ubirajara van Kolck, “Spectra and Scatter- + [144] Liang Tang and Cong-Feng Qiao, “Mass Spectra of 0 −, ing of Light Lattice Nuclei from Effective Field Theory,” + + 1− , and 2 − Exotic Glueballs,” Nucl. Phys. B904, 282–296 Phys. Rev. C92, 054002 (2015), arXiv:1506.09048 [nucl- (2016), arXiv:1509.00305 [hep-ph]. th]; Jozef J. Dudek, “Hadron scattering and resonances [145] F. Buisseret, C. Semay, V. Mathieu, and B. Silvestre-Brac, in QCD,” Proceedings, 16th International Conference on “Excited string and constituent gluon descriptions of hy- Hadron Spectroscopy (Hadron 2015), AIP Conf. Proc. 1735, brid mesons,” Proceedings, 20th European Conference on 020014 (2016); Anthony Francis, Renwick J. Hudspith, Few-Body Problems in Physics (EFB20), Few Body Syst. 44, Randy Lewis, and Kim Maltman, “Doubly bottom strong- 87–89 (2008). interaction stable tetraquarks from lattice QCD,” (2016), [146] Roscoe Giles and S. H. H. Tye, “The application of the arXiv:1607.05214 [hep-lat]. quark - confining string to the psi spectroscopy,” Phys. [155] Anthony M. Green and P. Pennanen, “An Interquark Rev. D16, 1079 (1977); D. Horn and J. Mandula, “A model potential model for multiquark systems,” Phys. Rev. of mesons with constituent gluons,” D17, 898 (1978). C57, 3384–3391 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9804003 [hep-lat]; [147] P. Hasenfratz, R. R. Horgan, J. Kuti, and J. M. Richard, Christopher Michael and P. Pennanen (UKQCD), “Two “The Effects of Colored Glue in the QCD Motivated Bag heavy - light mesons on a lattice,” Phys. Rev. D60, 054012 of Heavy Quark - anti-Quark Systems,” Phys. Lett. B95, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9901007 [hep-lat]; Gunnar Bali and 23

Martin Hetzenegger, “Static-light meson-meson poten- [167] Jean-Marc Richard, “Stability of the pentaquark in a tials,” PoS LATTICE2010, 142 (2010), arXiv:1011.0571 naive string model,” Phys. Rev. C81, 015205 (2010), [hep-lat]; Pedro Bicudo, Krzysztof Cichy, Antje Peters, arXiv:0908.2944 [hep-ph]. and Marc Wagner, “BB interactions with static bottom [168] J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and J-M. Richard, “Stability of quarks from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D93, 034501 (2016), hexaquarks in the string limit of confinement,” Phys.Rev. arXiv:1510.03441 [hep-lat]. D85, 014019 (2012), arXiv:1111.5921 [hep-ph]. [156] A. De Rújula, Howard Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, [169] Javier Vijande, Alfredo Valcarce, and Jean-Marc Richard, “Hadron masses in a gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D12, 147– “Adiabaticity and color mixing in tetraquark spec- 162 (1975). troscopy,” Phys. Rev. D87, 034040 (2013), arXiv:1301.6212 [157] H. Takahashi et al., “Observation of a 6He double hyper- [hep-ph]. ΛΛ nucleus,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 212502 (2001). [170] Bernard Silvestre-Brac, Claude Semay, Ilya M. Narodet- [158] M. Oka, K. Shimizu, and K. Yazaki, “The Dihyperon State skii, and A. I. Veselov, “The Baryonic Y -shape confin- in the Quark Cluster Model,” Phys. Lett. B130, 365 (1983); ing potential energy and its approximants,” Eur. Phys. Jonathan L. Rosner, “SU(3) Breaking and the H Dibaryon,” J. C32, 385–397 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0309247 [hep-ph]; Phys. Rev. D33, 2043 (1986); G. Karl and P. Zenczykowski, P. Bicudo and M. Cardoso, “Iterative method to com- “H dibaryon spectrocopy,” Phys. Rev. D36, 2079 (1987); pute the Fermat points and Fermat distances of multi- A. Faessler and U. Straub, “Baryon baryon interaction quarks,” Phys. Lett. B674, 98–102 (2009), arXiv:0812.0777 in the quark model and the H dibaryon,” In Erice 1989, [physics.comp-ph]; V. Dmitrašinovi´c,Toru Sato, and Proceedings, The nature of hadrons and nuclei by electron Milovan Šuvakov, “Low-lying spectrum of the Y -string scattering, 323-332., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 24, 323–332 three-quark potential using hyper-spherical coordinates,” (1990). Eur. Phys. J. C62, 383–397 (2009), arXiv:0906.2327 [hep- [159] J. Leandri and B. Silvestre-Brac, “Systematics of QQ¯ 4 Sys- ph]. tems With a Pure Chromomagnetic Interaction,” Phys. [171] C. Semay and B. Silvestre-Brac, “Diquonia and potential Rev. D40, 2340–2352 (1989); B. Silvestre-Brac and J. Lean- models,” Z. Phys. C61, 271–275 (1994). dri, “Systematics of q6 systems in a simple chromomag- [172] D. Janc and M. Rosina, “The Tcc = DD∗ molecular state,” netic model,” Phys. Rev. D45, 4221–4239 (1992); J. Leandri Few Body Syst. 35, 175–196 (2004), hep-ph/0405208. and B. Silvestre-Brac, “Dibaryon states containing two [173] J. Vijande, E. Weissman, A. Valcarce, and N. Barnea, “Are different types of heavy quarks,” Phys. Rev. D51, 3628– there compact heavy four-quark bound states?” Phys. 3637 (1995). Rev. D76, 094027 (2007), arXiv:0710.2516 [hep-ph]. [160] D. B. Lichtenberg and R. Roncaglia, “Colormagnetic in- [174] J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, J. M. Richard, and P. Sorba, teraction, diquarks, and exotic hadrons,” in International “Search for doubly-heavy dibaryons in a quark model,” Workshop on Diquarks, Turin, Italy, November 2-4, 1992 Phys. Rev. D94, 034038 (2016), arXiv:1608.03982 [hep-ph]. (1992); Franco Buccella, Hallstein Høgåsen, Jean-Marc [175] Douglas Rayner Hartree, The calculation of atomic struc- Richard, and Paul Sorba, “Chromomagnetism, flavour tures (Wiley, New York, NY, 1957). symmetry breaking and S-wave tetraquarks,” Eur. Phys. [176] C. Quigg and Jonathan L. Rosner, “Quantum Mechan- J. C49, 743–754 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608001. ics with Applications to Quarkonium,” Phys.Rept. 56, [161] J. P. Ader, J. M. Richard, and P. Taxil, “Do narrow heavy 167–235 (1979); Harald Grosse and André Martin, “Ex- multiquark states exist?” Phys. Rev. D25, 2370 (1982); act Results on Potential Models for Quarkonium Sys- L. Heller and J. A. Tjon, “On the existence of stable tems,” Phys. Rept. 60, 341 (1980); Particle Physics and the dimesons,” D35, 969 (1987); S. Zouzou, B. Silvestre-Brac, Schrödinger Equation; new ed., Cambridge monographs on C. Gignoux, and J. M. Richard, “Four quark bound states,” particle physics, nuclear physics, and cosmology (Cam- Z. Phys. C30, 457 (1986); J. Carlson, L. Heller, and J. A. bridge Univ., Cambridge, 2005). Tjon, “Stability of dimesons,” Phys. Rev. D37, 744 (1988). [177] Jean-Marc Richard and Pierre Taxil, “The Ordering of [162] Dario Bressanini, Massimo Mella, and Gabriele Morosi, Low Lying Bound States of Three Identical Particles,” “Stability of four-body systems in three and two dimen- Nucl. Phys. B329, 310–326 (1990); F. Stancu and P. Stassart, sions: A theoretical and quantum monte carlo study of “Negative parity nonstrange baryons,” Phys. Lett. B269, biexciton molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 4956–4959 (1998); 243–246 (1991). K. Varga, J. Usukura, and Y. Suzuki, “Recent applications [178] J. M. Richard, “The Nonrelativistic three-body problem of the stochastic variational method,” in Few-Body Prob- for baryons,” Phys. Rept. 212, 1–76 (1992). lems in Physics ’98, edited by B. Desplanques, K. Protasov, [179] Jim Mitroy, Sergiy Bubin, Wataru Horiuchi, Yasuyuki B. Silvestre-Brac, and J. Carbonell (1999) p. 11. Suzuki, Ludwik Adamowicz, Wojciech Cencek, Krzysztof [163] Richard J. Lloyd and James P. Vary, “All charm Szalewicz, Jacek Komasa, D. Blume, and Kálmán Varga, tetraquarks,” Phys. Rev. D70, 014009 (2004), arXiv:hep- “Theory and application of explicitly correlated gaus- ph/0311179 [hep-ph]. sians,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 693–749 (2013). [164] Cafer Ay, Jean-Marc Richard, and J. Hyam Rubinstein, [180] E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, “Gaussian ex- “Stability of asymmetric tetraquarks in the minimal- pansion method for few-body systems,” Prog. Part. Nucl. path linear potential,” Phys. Lett. B674, 227–231 (2009), Phys. 51, 223–307 (2003). arXiv:0901.3022 [math-ph]. [181] Mauro Anselmino, Enrico Predazzi, Svante Ekelin, [165] F. Lenz, J. T. Londergan, E. J. Moniz, R. Rosenfelder, Sverker Fredriksson, and D. B. Lichtenberg, “Diquarks,” M. Stingl, and K. Yazaki, “Quark Confinement and Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1199–1234 (1993). Hadronic Interactions,” Annals Phys. 170, 65 (1986). [182] Stanley J. Brodsky, Guy F. de Téramond, Hans Günter [166] J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and J. M. Richard, “Stability of Dosch, and Cédric Lorcé, “Meson/Baryon/Tetraquark multiquarks in a simple string model,” Phys. Rev. D76, Supersymmetry from Superconformal Algebra and Light- 114013 (2007), arXiv:0707.3996 [hep-ph]. 24

Front Holography,” Conference on New Physics at the and Decay Properties of Ultraheavy Quarks,” Phys. Lett. Large Hadron Collider Singapore, Singapore, February 29- B181, 157–163 (1986). March 4, 2016, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31, 1630029 (2016), [191] Ming-xing Luo, Kai Wang, Tao Xu, Liangliang Zhang, arXiv:1606.04638 [hep-ph]. and Guohuai Zhu, “Squarkonium, diquarkonium, and [183] D. B. Lichtenberg, R. Roncaglia, and E. Predazzi, “Pre- octetonium at the LHC and their diphoton decays,” Phys. dicting exotic hadron masses from supersymmetry and a Rev. D93, 055042 (2016), arXiv:1512.06670 [hep-ph]. quark-diquark model,” J. Phys. G23, 865–874 (1997). [192] Mihailo Backovi´c,“A Theory of Ambulance Chasing,” [184] I. L. Grach and I. M. Narodetsky, “Diquark correlations (2016), arXiv:1603.01204 [physics.soc-ph]. in the proton,” Few Body Syst. 16, 151–163 (1994). [193] Anthony J. G. Hey and Robert L. Kelly, “Baryon spec- [185] S. Fleck, B. Silvestre-Brac, and J. M. Richard, “Search for troscopy,” Phys. Rept. 96, 71 (1983). Diquark Clustering in Baryons,” Phys. Rev. D38, 1519– [194] S. A. Dytman, “Impact of recent data on N* struc- 1529 (1988). ture,” ICTP 4th International Conference on Perspectives in [186] André Martin, “Regge trajectories in the quark model,” Hadronic Physics Trieste, Italy, May 12-16, 2003, Eur. Phys. Z. Phys. C32, 359 (1986). J. A19, SUPPL161–65 (2004), [,61(2004)]. [187] Eric Braaten, Christian Langmack, and D. Hudson Smith, [195] R. A. Briceno et al., “Issues and Opportunities in “Born-Oppenheimer Approximation for the XYZ Mesons,” Exotic Hadrons,” Chin. Phys. C40, 042001 (2016), Phys. Rev. D90, 014044 (2014), arXiv:1402.0438 [hep-ph]. arXiv:1511.06779 [hep-ph]. [188] S. Dubynskiy and M. B. Voloshin, “Hadro-Charmonium,” [196] R. L. Jaffe and F. E. Low, “The Connection Between Quark Phys. Lett. B666, 344–346 (2008), arXiv:0803.2224 [hep- Model Eigenstates and Low- Energy Scattering,” Phys. ph]; M. B. Voloshin, “Zc (3900) - what is inside?” Phys. Rev. D19, 2105–2118 (1979). Rev. D87, 091501 (2013), arXiv:1304.0380 [hep-ph]. [197] Sverker Fredriksson and Magnus Jändel, “The diquark [189] Tai Tsun Wu and Sau Lan Wu, “Augmented standard deuteron,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 14 (1982). model and the simplest scenario,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30, [198] L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, “From pen- 1550201 (2015). taquarks to dibaryons in Λb(5620) decays,” Phys. Lett. [190] Ikaros I. Y. Bigi, Yuri L. Dokshitzer, Valery A. Khoze, B750, 37–38 (2015), arXiv:1508.04459 [hep-ph]. Johann H. Kuhn, and Peter M. Zerwas, “Production [199] C. Amsler et al., “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Lett. B667, 1 (2008).