DOCSLIB.ORG

Suitability of Great South Bay, New York to Blooms of Pfiesteria Piscicida and P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suitability of Great South Bay, New York to Blooms of Pfiesteria Piscicida and P City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Summer 8-10-2015 Suitability of Great South Bay, New York to Blooms of Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae Prior to Superstorm Sandy, October 29, 2012 Pawel Tomasz Zablocki CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/6 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Suitability of Great South Bay, New York, to Blooms of Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae Prior to Superstorm Sandy, October 29, 2012. By Pawel Zablocki Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Hunter College of the City of New York 2015 Thesis sponsor: __25 July 2015 Peter X. Marcotullio Date First Reader _2 August 2015 Karl H. Szekielda Date Second Reader i Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor, Professor H. Gong and two of my excellent readers—Professor Peter Marcotullio and Professor Karl Szekielda who provided their invaluable advice, alleviated my concerns, and weathered the avalanche of my questions. ii Abstract of the Thesis Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae are toxic dinoflagellates implicated in massive fish kills in North Carolina and Maryland during 1990s. A set of physical, chemical, and biological factors influence population dynamics of these organisms. This study employs information gathered from relevant literature on temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, turbulent mixing, and dissolved nutrients, bacteria, algae, microzooplankton, mesozooplankton, bivalve mollusks, finfish, and other toxic dinoflagellates, which influence Pfiesteria population dynamics. The research focused on whether conditions in the Great South Bay, Long Island, New York were suitable to blooms of Pfiesteria species prior to the passage of superstorm Sandy in October 2012. The Great South Bay is a coastal lagoon under intensive physicochemical and biological study. A comparison of conditions between areas where Pfiesteria blooms emerged and that of the Great South Bay proved inconclusive. The simply inventory-like analysis was, therefore, insufficient to be employed in answering the research question. Seemingly, residence time plays an important role in coastal marine environments characterized by high degree of separation from coastal ocean. Suitability of Great South Bay to Pfiesteria blooms could not be established based on simple comparative analysis which did not stress the importance of residence time; it proved inconclusive with respect to two determinants of Pfiesteria population dynamics— turbulent mixing and potential interactions of Pfiesteria with zooplankton. However, based on analysis that recognized lagoonal character of Great South Bay and the importance of residence time, prior to the passage of Sandy, the confined areas of Great South Bay’s easternmost reaches constitute environments where Pfiesteria blooms appear to have been feasible. Blooms have never occurred, though. Some of the reasons as to why this might be the case include general iii complexity of HAB development and persistence as well as interactions with viruses and abundant populations of brown tide species Aureococcus anophagefferens . iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………...………….......ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………...viii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………….……….…... ix List of Terms……………………………………………………………………………………....x List of Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………...xii 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..1 2. Background 2.1. Study Site Description……………………………………………………………………..2 2.2. Analytical Procedures…………………………………………………………...............…4 2.3. Dinoflagellates, HABs, and Pfiesteria Species: an Overview………………………..…....4 2.4. Physicochemical and Biological Determinants of Pfiesteria Population Dynamics 2.4.1. Effective Cell Concentration ……..…………………………………………………...…8 2.4.2. Temperature…………………………………………….…………….…………...….8 2.4.3. Salinity…………………………………………………………………….………….9 2.4.4. Dissolved Oxygen Concentration …….…………….…………………...............….10 2.4.5. pH …….…………………………………………………………………………..…11 2.4.6. Turbulent Mixing……...……………………………………………...……………..13 2.4.7. Availability of Dissolved Nutrients………………………...……………………….14 2.4.8. Availability of Finfish Prey……….…………………………………...………….….14 2.4.9. Availability of Algal Prey…………………………………………..……………….17 2.4.10. Interactions with Bacteria…………………...……………………………………..18 v 2.4.11. Interactions with Microzooplankton ……………………………..……………......20 2.4.12. Interactions with Mesozooplankton ……………………………………………….21 2.4.13. Interactions with Bivalve Mollusks 2.4.13a. Eastern Oyster ( Crassostrea virginica)…………………………….……….22 2.4.13b. Hard Clam ( Mercenaria mercenaria )…………………………………..….24 2.4.13c. Bay Scallop ( Aequipecten irradians )………………………………………25 2.4.14. Interactions with Other Toxic Dinoflagellates…………………………………..…27 3. Status of Physicochemical and Biological Determinants of Pfiesteria Population Dynamics in Great South Bay Prior to Superstorm Sandy 3.1. Temperature……………………………………………………………………...............28 3.2. Salinity…………………………………………………………………………………...30 3.3. Dissolved Oxygen Concentration …….…………………………………………………31 3.4. pH………………………………………………………………….……………………..33 3.5. Turbulent Mixing ……………….……………………………………………………….34 3.6. Availability of Dissolved Nutrients……………………………………………………...36 3.7. Availability of Finfish Prey……………………………………………………………...39 3.8. Availability of Algal Prey…………………...…………………………………………...42 3.9. Interactions with Bacteria………………………………………………………………..43 3.10. Interactions with Microzooplankton ………………………………………………...…44 3.11. Interactions with Mesozooplankton.……………………………………………………45 3.12. Interactions with Eastern Oysters ( Crassostrea virginica ) …………………………….45 3.13. Interactions with Hard Clams ( Mercenaria mercenaria ) ……………….……………..47 3.14. Interactions with Bay Scallops ( Aequipecten irradians ) ………………………………49 vi 4. Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………..51 5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….94 References……………………………………………………………………………….….......99 vii List of Figures Figure 2.1. Constituent Embayments of GSB …………………………………………………….4 Figure 3.1. Average July Sea Surface Temperature Readings along the Eastern Coast of the United States……………………………………………………………………….30 Figure 3.2. Temperature Measurements at Bellport and Blue Point, Great South Bay……….....31 Figure 3.3. Great South Bay Salinity…………………………………..….……………..…........32 Figure 3.4. Great South Bay Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations……...……………………..…..34 Figure 3.5. Great South Bay pH Profile………………………………….…….………………...35 Figure 3.6. Great South Bay Tidal Range…………………….…………………….……………36 Figure 3.7. Great South Bay Tidal Current Velocities………………………..…….................…36 Figure 3.8. Recreational Catches of Black Sea Bass in Great South Bay ………………………42 Figure 3.9. Commercial and Recreational Northern Kingfish Catches in Great South Bay…….42 Figure 3.10. Commercial and Recreational Great South Bay Bluefish Catches.…...…………...42 Figure 3.11. General Decline of Bivalve Mollusk Fisheries in Great South Bay……………......45 Figure 3.12. Decline of Commercial Hard Clam Yield in Great South Bay …………………....49 Figure 3.13. Decline of Commercial Bay Scallop Catch in Great South Bay………………..….50 Figure 4.1. Spatial Variability of Dissolved Nitrogen Concentrations in a Typical Coastal Lagoon (Great South Bay)…….................................................................................................68 Figure 4.2. Potential Ingestion of Pfiesteria by Microzooplankton according to Salinity………84 viii List of Tables Table 2.1. Occurrence of Pfiesteria in Water and Sediment Samples Collected in Coastal Marine Systems along the Eastern and Southeastern United States (1998-2000)……………...6 Table 3.1. Eutrophication Status of Great South Bay and Other Coastal Marine Systems in the United States………………………………………………………….. ………….…37 Table 3.2. Respective Contribution of Main Nitrogen Sources to of Great South Bay.................38 Table 4.1. Some Differences between Estuaries and Coastal Lagoons………….........................60 Table 4.2. Status of Some Physicochemical Factors in Celestún Lagoon, Mexico….…………..67 ix List of Terms: Advection – horizontal movement of particles in the atmosphere or the sea Anoxia – a state in which an aquatic/marine waterbody is completely devoid of dissolved oxygen Axenic – containing no bacteria and other normally co-occurring microorganisms Autotrophy – an ability of organisms to synthetize their nutritional requirements Bacterivore – an organism that feeds on bacteria Benthic – relating to the lowest level of a waterbody Bloom – large concentration of a single phytoplankton species Chlorophyll – pigment used by plants to conduct photosynthesis Chloroplasts – chlorophyll-containing organella algae and other plants use to photosynthesize Cilia (singular: cilium) – thin elongated outgrowths ciliated protozoa use to move through water column Culture – cultivation of organisms in laboratory setting Cyst – thick-walled spherical formations which a number of dinoflagellate species turn into to survive unhospitable environmental conditions. Diatoms – the most abundant marine algae group Denitrification – biologically mediated transformation of nitrate to gaseous nitrogen, nitric oxide or nitrous oxide Encystment – a process by which an organism
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Red Tide Dinoflagellate Karenia Brevis
    G Model HARALG-488; No of Pages 11 Harmful Algae xxx (2009) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review The Florida red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis: New insights into cellular and molecular processes underlying bloom dynamics Frances M. Van Dolah a,*, Kristy B. Lidie a, Emily A. Monroe a, Debashish Bhattacharya b, Lisa Campbell c, Gregory J. Doucette a, Daniel Kamykowski d a Marine Biotoxins Program, NOAA Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Resarch, Charleston, SC, United States b Department of Biological Sciences and Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States c Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States d Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The dinoflagellate Karenia brevis is responsible for nearly annual red tides in the Gulf of Mexico that Available online xxx cause extensive marine mortalities and human illness due to the production of brevetoxins. Although the mechanisms regulating its bloom dynamics and toxicity have received considerable attention, Keywords: investigation into these processes at the cellular and molecular level has only begun in earnest during Bacterial–algal interactions the past decade. This review provides an overview of the recent advances in our understanding of the Cell cycle cellular and molecular biology on K. brevis. Several molecular resources developed for K. brevis, including Dinoflagellate cDNA and genomic DNA libraries, DNA microarrays, metagenomic libraries, and probes for population Florida red tide genetics, have revolutionized our ability to investigate fundamental questions about K.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameterisation of Microprotozooplankton Grazing and Growth
    Parameterisation of Microprotozooplankton Grazing and Growth: From data analysis to simulations in ecosystem model coupled to general circulation-biogeochemical model. Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. Nat. – Im Fachbereich 2 (Biologie/Chemie) Der Universität Bremen vorgelegt von Sévrine Sailley Institutes: Alfred Wegener Institut for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK British Antarctic Survey (BAS), Cambridge, UK University Bremen, Germany This work was funded by Euroceans program, project number WP3.2-SYS-1092. 2 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dieter Wolf-Gladrow Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Corinne Le Quéré Tag des öffentlichen Kolloquims: Universität Bremen, 23 November 2009 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich nach § 6 Abs. 5 der Promotionsordnung der Uni Bremen (vom 14 März 2007), dass ich die Vorliegende Dissertation (1) ohne unerlaubte Hilfe angefertigt habe, (2) keine anderen als die von mir angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe und (3) die den benutzen Werken wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht habe Sévrine Sailley 3 4 Acknowledgments Here, I would like to thank people who helped me in different ways through this thesis. There are quite a lot of people who should figure here, so if I’ve forgotten somebody, I’m sorry it wasn’t on purpose. Thanks to Christine and Dieter for welcoming me at AWI and in Bremerhaven and helping not just with the thesis but also simply life in Germany, thanks for being more than just supervisors. Thanks to Clare Enright for helping me arrange my stay at BAS, but also with going through all the bugs that happened in PlankTOM, or simply little problems with the cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Analysis of Balantidium Ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) Based on Single-Cell Transcriptome Sequencing
    Parasite 24, 43 (2017) © Z. Sun et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017043 Available online at: www.parasite-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenomic analysis of Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) based on single-cell transcriptome sequencing Zongyi Sun1, Chuanqi Jiang2, Jinmei Feng3, Wentao Yang2, Ming Li1,2,*, and Wei Miao2,* 1 Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China 2 Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 7 Donghu South Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Province, PR China 3 Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, PR China Received 22 April 2017, Accepted 12 October 2017, Published online 14 November 2017 Abstract- - In this paper, we present transcriptome data for Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni Chen, 1955 collected from the hindgut of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). We evaluated sequence quality and de novo assembled a preliminary transcriptome, including 43.3 megabits and 119,141 transcripts. Then we obtained a final transcriptome, including 17.7 megabits and 35,560 transcripts, by removing contaminative and redundant sequences. Phylogenomic analysis based on a supermatrix with 132 genes comprising 53,873 amino acid residues and phylogenetic analysis based on SSU rDNA of 27 species were carried out herein to reveal the evolutionary relationships among six ciliate groups: Colpodea, Oligohymenophorea, Litostomatea, Spirotrichea, Hetero- trichea and Protocruziida. The topologies of both phylogenomic and phylogenetic trees are discussed in this paper. In addition, our results suggest that single-cell sequencing is a sound method of obtaining sufficient omics data for phylogenomic analysis, which is a good choice for uncultivable ciliates.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Against Production of Ichthyotoxins by Pfiesteria Shumwayae
    Are Pfiesteria species toxicogenic? Evidence against production of ichthyotoxins by Pfiesteria shumwayae J. P. Berry*, K. S. Reece†, K. S. Rein‡, D. G. Baden§, L. W. Haas†, W. L. Ribeiro†, J. D. Shields†, R. V. Snyder‡, W. K. Vogelbein†, and R. E. Gawley*¶ *Department of Chemistry͞National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Marine and Freshwater Biomedical Science Center, University of Miami, P.O. Box 249118, Coral Gables, FL 33124; †Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Route 1208, Gloucester Point, VA 23062; ‡Department of Chemistry, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199; and §Center for Marine Science, University of North Carolina, 5600 Marvin K. Moss Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409 Edited by John H. Law, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved May 29, 2002 (received for review April 12, 2002) The estuarine genus Pfiesteria has received considerable attention Materials and Methods since it was first identified and proposed to be the causative agent Dinoflagellate Cultures. A clonal isolate of Pfiesteria shumwayae of fish kills along the mid-Atlantic coast in 1992. The presumption [Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton (CCMP) 2089] was has been that the mechanism of fish death is by release of one or maintained in cultures as described below. The identity of more toxins by the dinoflagellate. In this report, we challenge the P. shumwayae was confirmed additionally by PCR using notion that Pfiesteria species produce ichthyotoxins. Specifically, species-specific primers for regions of the ribosomal RNA we show that (i) simple centrifugation, with and without ultra- gene complex (29). sonication, is sufficient to ‘‘detoxify’’ water of actively fish-killing Algal prey.
    [Show full text]
  • CH28 PROTISTS.Pptx
    9/29/14 Biosc 41 Announcements 9/29 Review: History of Life v Quick review followed by lecture quiz (history & v How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? phylogeny) v What is thought to have been the first genetic material? v Lecture: Protists v Are we tetrapods? v Lab: Protozoa (animal-like protists) v Most atmospheric oxygen comes from photosynthesis v Lab exam 1 is Wed! (does not cover today’s lab) § Since many of the first organisms were photosynthetic (i.e. cyanobacteria), a LOT of excess oxygen accumulated (O2 revolution) § Some organisms adapted to use it (aerobic respiration) Review: History of Life Review: Phylogeny v Which organelles are thought to have originated as v Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry endosymbionts? v Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution v During what event did fossils resembling modern taxa suddenly appear en masse? v A valid clade is monophyletic, meaning it consists of the ancestor taxon and all its descendants v How many mass extinctions seem to have occurred during v A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and Earth’s history? Describe one? some, but not all, of the descendants v When is adaptive radiation likely to occur? v A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor v Maximum parsimony assumes the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary events is most likely Quiz 3 (History and Phylogeny) BIOSC 041 1. How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? 2. Why might many organisms have evolved to use aerobic respiration? PROTISTS! Reference: Chapter 28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterborne Pathogens in Agricultural Watersheds
    United States Department of Waterborne Pathogens in Agriculture Natural Resources Agricultural Watersheds Conservation Service Watershed Science by Barry H. Rosen Institute NRCS, Watershed Science Institute School of Natural Resources University of Vermont, Burlington Contents Introduction ..................................................... 1 Pathogens of concern ..................................... 3 Pathogens in the environment .....................22 Control methods............................................ 33 Monitoring and evaluation ........................... 43 Anticipated developments ........................... 47 Summary ........................................................ 48 Glossary .......................................................... 49 References...................................................... 52 With contributions by Richard Croft, Natural Resources Conservation Service (retired) Edward R. Atwill, D.V.M., Ph.D., School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 18830 Road 112, Tulare, California Susan Stehman, V.M.D., Senior Extension Veterinarian, New York State Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Susan Wade, Ph.D., Director Parasitology Laboratory, New York State Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Issued June 2000 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimi- nation in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, na- tional origin, gender,
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing of Two Euplotid Ciliates on the Heterotrophic Dinoflagellates Pfiesteria Piscicida and Cryptoperidiniopsis Sp
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 33: 303–308, 2003 Published November 7 Aquat Microb Ecol NOTE Grazing of two euplotid ciliates on the heterotrophic dinoflagellates Pfiesteria piscicida and Cryptoperidiniopsis sp. Scott G. Gransden1, Alan J. Lewitus1, 2,* 1Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine and Coastal Science, University of South Carolina, PO Box 1630, Georgetown, South Carolina 29442, USA 2Marine Resources Research Institute, SC Department of Natural Resources, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, South Carolina 29412, USA ABSTRACT: Pfiesteria piscicida and Cryptoperidiniopsis spp. breaks have been associated with millions of dollars of are common co-occurring heterotrophic dinoflagellates in lost revenue to the fisheries and tourism industries estuaries along the Atlantic coast of the United States. We (Burkholder & Glasgow 1997, CENR 2000). isolated P. piscicida, Cryptoperidiniopsis sp., and 2 benthic ciliates (Euplotes vannus and E. woodruffi) from North Inlet Increased awareness of Pfiesteria spp.’s potential estuary, South Carolina, and examined the growth and graz- impact on environmental and human health has led ing properties of the ciliates on cultures of the dinoflagellates to several studies on the dinoflagellates’ trophic dy- maintained with cryptophyte (Storeatula major) prey. Ciliate namics. Ingestion of P. piscicida by copepods, rotifers, growth and grazing parameters on cryptophyte monocultures or benthic ciliates has been reported (Burkholder & and mixed diets of cryptophytes and P. piscicida were signifi- cantly higher with E. woodruffi than E. vannus. Also, the net Glasgow 1995, Mallin et al. 1995). More recently, grazing impact of E. woodruffi on P. piscicida prey was higher Stoecker et al. (2000) added 5-chloromethylfluorescein than the impact on Cryptoperidiniopsis sp., while the E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.2-Assessment of Harmful Algae Bloom
    Maryland’s Coastal Bays: Ecosystem Health Assessment Chapter 6.2 Chapter 6.2 Assessment of harmful algae bloom species in the Maryland Coastal Bays Catherine Wazniak Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment, Annapolis, MD 21401 Abstract Thirteen potentially harmful algae taxa have been identified in the Maryland Coastal Bays: Aureococcus anophagefferens (brown tide), Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae, Chloromorum/ Chattonella spp., Heterosigma akashiwo, Fibrocapsa japonica, Prorocentrum minimum, Dinophysis spp., Amphidinium spp., Pseudo-nitzchia spp., Karlodinium micrum and two macroalgae genera (Gracilaria, Chaetomorpha). Presence of potentially toxic species is richest in the polluted tributaries of St. Martin River and Newport Bay. Approximately 5% of the phytoplankton species identified for Maryland’s Coastal Bays represent potentially harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. The HABs are recognized for their potentially toxic properties and, in some cases, their ability to produce large blooms negatively affecting light and dissolved oxygen resources. Brown tide (Aureococcus anophagefferens) has been the most widespread and prolific HAB species in the area in recent years, producing growth impacts to juvenile clams in test studies and potential impacts to sea grass distribution and growth (see Chapter 7.1). Macroalgal fluctuations may be evidence of a system balancing on the edge of a eutrophic (nutrient- enriched) state (see chapter 4). No evidence of toxic activity has been detected among the Coastal Bays phytoplankton. However, species such as Pseudo-nitzschia seriata, Prorocentrum minimum, Pfiesteria piscicida, Dinophysis acuminata and Karlodinium micrum have produced positive toxic bioassays or generated detectable toxins in Chesapeake Bay. Pfiesteria piscicida was retrospectively considered as the likely causative organism in a large historical fish kill on the Indian River, Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxins from Cyanobacteria
    FRI FOOD SAFETY REVIEWS TOXINS FROM CYANOBACTERIA M. Ellin Doyle Food Research Institute University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WI 53706 Contents34B Microcystins...................................................................................................................................2 Beta-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA)..........................................................................................3 Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Toxins ...................................................................................3 Anatoxin-a .....................................................................................................................................3 References......................................................................................................................................4 Appendix — FRI Briefing, May 1998: Toxins from Algae/Cyanobacteria (includes Pfiesteria) Cyanobacteria (previously called blue green algae) are strain-specific and is influenced by environmental ancient single-celled organisms, widely distributed in factors. These toxins include: aquatic environments, soil, and other moist surfaces Microcystins: heat stable, cyclic heptapep- and can survive in very inhospitable environments such tides that are toxic to liver cells and promote as hot springs and the arctic tundra. Some species growth of some tumors partner with fungi to form lichens, and others engage Beta-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA): in symbiotic relationships with higher plants. Cyano- a neurotoxin, possibly
    [Show full text]