Draft MCCLL November 2012 Newsletter Home.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps╎ Heavy Lift
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2005 A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter Anthony Cain Archer University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Archer, Anthony Cain, "A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1587 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Anthony Cain Archer entitled "A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard J. Ranaudo, U. Peter Solies Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Anthony Cain Archer entitled “A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. -
Visiting 2Nd Marine Air Wing
Visiting 2nd Marine Air Wing February 14, 2019 2ND MARINE WING AT TRIDENT JUNCTURE 2018: THE CASE OF MAG-31 ............ 3 Col. Matthew H. Phares, MAG-31 Commanding Officer ................................................................. 7 Lt. Col. Joshua M. Pieczonka, VMFA(AW)-224 .............................................................................. 8 2ND MARINE WING AT TRIDENT JUNCTURE 2018: THE CASE OF MAG-26 ........... 10 Colonel Chris Boniface .................................................................................................................. 14 Lt. Col. Mark C. Fowler ................................................................................................................. 15 THE OSPREY AT 2ND MARINE AIR WING: AN UPDATE FROM COLONEL BONIFACE ......................................................................................................................... 16 THE USMC AND A NEW CHAPTER IN HEAVY LIFT: THE CH-53K LOGS DEMO AT NEW RIVER ........................................................................................................ 19 PREPARING FOR EFFECTIVE FLEET SUPPORT: THE CH-53K LOG DEMO AT NEW RIVER ................................................................................................................ 23 WORKING THE LOGISTICS CON-OPS AS THE CH-53K ENTERS THE FORCE ........ 28 2 2nd Marine Wing at Trident Juncture 2018: The Case of MAG-31 02/12/2019 By Robbin Laird Last year during my visit to Norway, I had a chance to visit several airbases and talk with a wide variety of Norwegian -
Beaufort Recognizes Navy Cross Recipient
Cobra Gold The 2018 Friday, February 16, 2018 Jet Vol. 53, No. 06 Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, S.C. “The noiseStream you hear is the sound of freedom.” 8 beaufort.marines.mil | facebook.com/MCASBeaufort | youtube.com/MCASBeaufort | mcasbetwitter.com/MCASBeaufortSC | Instagram/mcasbeaufort Check out our new website at Thejetstream- PROTECT WHAT YOU’VE EARNED beaufort.com Beaufort recognizes Navy Cross recipient Marines and Sailors salute the headstone of Petty Officer 1st Class William Pinckney while Taps is played at the Beaufort National Cemetery, Feb. 10. The new headstone gives proper recognition to Pinckney’s Navy Cross, the second highest award for valor. Pinckney was awarded the Navy Cross during World War II when he saved the life of an unconscious Sailor after a bomb exploded below the flight deck of their ship. At the time of the award, Pinckney was only the second African American in U.S. Navy history to receive the award. Ultimately, Pinckney was one of four African American Sailors to be awarded the Navy Cross. Story by itus professor at the University of Cpl. Benjamin McDonald South Carolina Beaufort. “After Photos by coordinating with the president Lance Cpl. Christian Moreno of the rotary club, we had a new A new headstone honoring headstone in three weeks. So here Petty Officer 1st Class William we all are today to remember this Pinckney was unveiled at the naval hero.” Beaufort National Cemetery, Feb. Pinckney was awarded the 10. Navy Cross while serving aboard The new headstone gives Petty the USS Enterprise aircraft car- Officer Pinckney appropriate rec- rier north of the Santa Cruz Is- ognition for his Navy Cross, the lands Oct. -
USMC Beyond Their Current Contract Or Service Obligation
Implementing Force Integration: Issues and Challenges with DRM-2014-U-007338-Final April 2014 Photo credit: U.S. Marines from 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing listen to a brief as they begin training as part of the Lioness Team on Camp Korean Village, Iraq, July 31, 2006. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by ) Approved for distribution: April 2014 Research Team Leader Marine Corps Manpower Team This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Distribution limited to the Marine Corps. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract Number N00014-11-D-0323. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in DFARS 252.227-7013 and/or DFARS 252.227-7014. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the read- ing or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. Used to identify Classification level Contents Executive summary ............................................................................ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 Background ....................................................................................... 5 Issues .................................................................................................. 7 Data ................................................................................................... -
Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
S. HRG. 109–130 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of Defense Appropriations Fiscal Year 2006 109th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2863 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Defense Appropriations, 2006 (H.R. 2863) S. HRG. 109–130 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2863 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 99–854 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CONRAD BURNS, Montana HARRY REID, Nevada RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L. -
Olwell-Chapter IX
IX. CURRENT ARCHITECTURE A. INTRODUCTION The Current architecture of the USMC Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) is a Combined Arms and self-sustaining task-organized force, commonly a MEB within the framework of a Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) establishment. The MEB bridges the gap between the MEU, task-organized to provide a forward deployed presence, and the much larger MEF. The composition of the MEB is scalable and flexible, and varies with changing scenarios and nature of operations. The current architecture introduced here is based on a force structure required for conventional littoral assault scenario designed exclusively for the ExWar studies. With 30 days of sufficient supplies for sustained operations, the MEB is capable of conducting Amphibious Assault Operations and MPF operations. During potential crisis situations, a MEB may be forward deployed afloat for an extended period to provide an immediate combat response. A MEB can operate independently or serve as the advance echelon of a MEF. In essence, the MEB comprises the Command Element (CE), Ground Combat Element (GCE), Aviation Combat Element (ACE), and Combat Service and Support Element (CSSE), operating from amphibious ship platforms operated of the United States Navy. B. STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION A notional MEB structure and organization specific to the ExWar studies have been conceived based on the ideology and concept of operations of the existing USMC MEF doctrines. The “notional” MEB is a tasked organized force designed to respond to a full range of operations. The “notional” MEB size force is about 17,000 men and women. 1. Command Element (CE) The MEB command element is embedded in the MEF command element and identified by line number for training and rapid deployment. -
Col Charette Bio with Photo
Lunch Keynote Speaker 2010 Behavior, Energy & Climate Change Conference Colonel Bob Charette Jr. Director, Expeditionary Energy Office United States Marine Corps Colonel Bob “Brutus” Charette Jr. was born in Scranton, PA. He enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserves in 1985 and attended boot camp at Parris Island, SC. He then attended Officer Candidate School in Quantico, VA and was commissioned August 1986. He has earned a Bachelors of Science degree in Chemistry from Delaware Valley College (1986), Masters of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix (2002), and a Masters of National Security Strategy from the National War College (2007). Major professional schools attended; The Basic School (1986), Naval Fight Training (1988), FA-18 Flight Training (1989), Navy Fighter Weapons School (1991), Tactical Air Control Party School (1993), Weapons and Tactics Instructor course (1994), and Aviation Safety Officers course (1998), Army Command and General Staff College (2000- 2001), Marine Corps Commanders course (2004), and the National War College (2007). Units served and billets; VMFA-235 Embarkation and Pilot Training Officer (1989-1993), 3d Battalion/3d Marines Air Officer and Operations Officer (1993), VMFA-312 Admin Officer and Pilot Training Officer (1993-1995). VMFA-451 Aircraft Maintenance Officer and Operations Officer (1995- 1997), Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron-1 FA-18 Instructor, Director of Safety and Standardization, and Tactical Aircraft Department Head (1997-2000). I Marine Expeditionary Force G-5 CENTCOM Planner (2001), Task Force-58 Air Officer (2001-2002), VMFA-314 Executive Officer (2002- 2003), VMFA-323 Commanding Officer (2003-2005), Marine Aircraft Group-11 Operations Officer (2005- 2006). -
UFC 2-000-05N Facility Planning Criteria for Navy/Marine
UFC 2-000-05N Version: 200.20180510 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) FACILITY PLANNING FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SHORE INSTALLATIONS Series 200: Maintenance and Production Facilities Record of Changes: Date CCN # CCN Title Description of change Nov 2016 21154 Aircraft Armament Systems Shop Title of this CCN is changed from "Aviation Armament Shop" to "Aircraft Armament Systems Shop". Criteria was also revised. Dec 2016 21374 Landing Craft Rinse Rack CCN deleted Dec 2016 22940 Sawmill CCN deleted Dec 2016 22960 Baling Facility CCN deleted Dec 2016 21107 Maintenance Hangar - 02 Space FAC code changed from 1444 to 6100 (Administrative) Jan 2017 21940 Sewage Hose Storage Facility Reporting requirements corrected to “N”. CCN is inventory only. Jan 2017 21820 Construction / Weight Handling Incorrect diagram reference deleted. Equipment Shop Feb 2017 21920 Pavement And Ground Equipment Change reporting requirements to “N” as per Shed verbiage in CCN 21910 Feb 2017 21925 Public Works Shops Change reporting requirements to “N” as per Expendable/Work-In-Process Store verbiage in CCN 21910 May 2018 21181 Engine Test Cell (Non-NAVAIR Updated criteria Depot) May 2018 21105 Maintenance Hangar – O/H Space Updated criteria (High Bay) May 2018 21106 MAINTENANCE HANGAR – 01 Updated criteria SPACE (Shops And Maintenance Space) 200 Series - i UFC 2-000-05N May 2018 21107 Maintenance Hangar – 02 Space Updated criteria (Administrative) 200 Series - ii UFC 2-000-05N 200 SERIES MAINTENANCE AND PRODUCTION FACILITIES Table of Contents 211 MAINTENANCE - AIRCRAFT, SPARES ................................................... 13 211-1 GENERAL .................................................................................................. 13 211-2 NAVAIR DEPOT FACILITIES .................................................................... 18 211-3 ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES .............................................. 23 211-4 AIRCRAFT LOADING ............................................................................... -
UFC 2-000-05N Series
UFC 2-000-05N Version: 200.20210615 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) FACILITY PLANNING FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SHORE INSTALLATIONS Series 200: Maintenance and Production Facilities Record of Changes: Date CCN # CCN Title Description of change Nov 2016 21154 Aircraft Armament Systems Shop Title of this CCN is changed from "Aviation Armament Shop" to "Aircraft Armament Systems Shop". Criteria was also revised. Dec 2016 21374 Landing Craft Rinse Rack CCN deleted Dec 2016 22940 Sawmill CCN deleted Dec 2016 22960 Baling Facility CCN deleted Dec 2016 21107 Maintenance Hangar - 02 Space FAC code changed from 1444 to 6100 (Administrative) Jan 2017 21940 Sewage Hose Storage Facility Reporting requirements corrected to “N”. CCN is inventory only. Jan 2017 21820 Construction / Weight Handling Incorrect diagram reference deleted. Equipment Shop Feb 2017 21920 Pavement And Ground Equipment Change reporting requirements to “N” as per Shed verbiage in CCN 21910 Feb 2017 21925 Public Works Shops Change reporting requirements to “N” as per Expendable/Work-In-Process Store verbiage in CCN 21910 May 2018 21181 Engine Test Cell (Non-NAVAIR Updated criteria Depot) May 2018 21105 Maintenance Hangar – O/H Space Updated criteria (High Bay) May 2018 21106 MAINTENANCE HANGAR – 01 Updated criteria SPACE (Shops And Maintenance Space) 200 Series - i UFC 2-000-05N Date CCN # CCN Title Description of change May 2018 21107 Maintenance Hangar – 02 Space Updated criteria (Administrative) Aug 2019 21101 Aircraft Engine Test Cell Building Title of this CCN is changed from "Aircraft Acoustical Enclosure" to "Aircraft Engine Test Cell Building". Sep 2019 21107 Maintenance Hangar – 02 Space Replaced reference to “UFC 4-211-01N” with “UFC (Administrative) 4-211-01, as updated” Sept 2019 21105 Maintenance Hangar – O/H Space Corrected formula for OH required hangar width. -
Statement of General John Paxton Assistant
STATEMENT OF GENERAL JOHN PAXTON ASSISTANT COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS ON MARINE CORPS 2017 BUDGET REQUEST AND READINESS 3 MARCH 2016 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING ROOM 2118 1 Introduction Chairman Wittman, Ranking Member Bordallo, and distinguished members of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness: I appreciate the opportunity to testify on the current state of readiness in your Marine Corps and on our Fiscal Year 2017 budget request. We greatly appreciate the continued support of Congress and of this subcommittee in ensuring our ability to remain the nation’s ready force. The Marine Corps has been our nation’s crisis response force since our first landing in the Bahamas, on this very date in March 1776. Two hundred and forty years ago today the Marines led by our first Commandant, Captain Samuel Nichols, seized weapons and gunpowder for George Washington’s Continental Army. Since that day the Marine Corps has been dedicated to being our country’s expeditionary force in readiness, chartered by the 82nd Congress to be the most ready force when the nation is least ready. I thank this Committee and the 114th Congress for their appreciation of that vital role, which you reaffirmed in the most recent National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Your Marine Corps Today 2015 was a demanding year, much like any other for your Marine Corps. Our expeditionary forces continue to be in demand and heavily employed in the face of an increasingly challenging global environment. Your Marines executed approximately 100 operations, 20 of them amphibious, 140 security cooperation activities with our partners and allies, and 160 major exercises. -
NAVMC 2922 Unit Awards Manual (PDF)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2008 ELLIOT ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5030 IH REPLY REFER TO: NAVMC 2 922 MMMA JAN 1 C IB# FOREWORD 1. Purpose. To publish a listing of all unit awards that have been presented to Marine Corps units since the beginning of World War II. 2. Cancellation. NAVMC 2922 of 17 October 2011. 3. Information. This NAVMC provides a ready reference for commanders in determining awards to which their units are entitled for specific periods of time, facilitating the updating of individual records, and accommodating requests by Marines regarding their eligibility to wear appropriate unit award ribbon bars. a . Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Navy Unit Citation (NUC), Meritorious Unit Citation (MUC) : (1) All personnel permanently assigned and participated in the action(s) for which the unit was cited. (2) Transient, and temporary duty are normally ineligible. Exceptions may be made for individuals temporarily attached to the cited unit to provide direct support through the particular skills they posses. Recommendation must specifically mention that such personnel are recommended for participation in the award and include certification from the cited unit's commanding officer that individual{s) made a direct, recognizable contribution to the performance of the services that qualified the unit for the award. Authorized for participation by the awarding authority upon approval of the award. (3) Reserve personnel and Individual Augmentees <IAs) assigned to a unit are eligible to receive unit awards and should be specifically considered by commanding officers for inclusion as appropriate, based on the contributory service provided, (4) Civilian personnel, when specifically authorized, may wear the appropriate lapel device {point up). -
U.S.-Japan Alliance Conference: Meeting the Challenge Of
NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE U.S.-Japan Alliance Conference Meeting the Challenge of Amphibious Operations Scott W. Harold, Koichiro Bansho, Jeffrey W. Hornung, Koichi Isobe, Richard L. Simcock II Sponsored by the Government of Japan For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF387 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In order to explore the origins, development, and implications of Japan’s decision to establish an Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade (ARDB) within the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF), the RAND Corporation convened a public conference on March 6, 2018, at its offices in Santa Monica, California, that brought together leading U.S.