DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corpsâ•Ž Heavy Lift

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2005 A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter Anthony Cain Archer University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Archer, Anthony Cain, "A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1587 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Anthony Cain Archer entitled "A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard J. Ranaudo, U. Peter Solies Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Anthony Cain Archer entitled “A Case for a Tanker Capability for the U. S. Marine Corps’ Heavy Lift Replacement Helicopter.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard J. Ranaudo U. Peter Solies Acceptance for the Council: Anne Mayhew Vice Chancellor and Dean of Graduate Studies (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) A CASE FOR A TANKER CAPABILITY FOR THE U. S. MARINE CORPS’ HEAVY LIFT REPLACEMENT HELICOPTER A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Anthony Cain Archer May 2005 Copyright 2005 by Anthony Cain Archer All rights reserved ii DEDICATION I wish to thank my major professor, Bob Richards, for his advice and guidance. Also, I would not have been able to begin, craft, and complete this effort without the support and love of my wife Jennifer. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those who have helped me complete my Master of Science in Aviation Systems, and specifically, completing this thesis project. First I must thank Bob Richards for his guidance and convincing me to write on this subject matter. Also I want to thank everyone at the program office (PMA- 261) who helped with the details of the technical and problematic aspects of this work. Additionally, my gratitude goes to all my friends and co-workers at Air Test and Evaluation Squadron TWO ONE (HX-21) who listened and commented on my ideas, good and not so good. Finally, I wish to thank my family and close friends who encouraged me along the way to make this work a reality. iv ABSTRACT The idea behind this research project was to stimulate interest, dialogue, exploratory investigation, and the application of resources into the concept of an organic, rotary wing based, tanker asset for the U.S Navy’s Expeditionary Strike Group, and its future operations and role in support of Sea Power 21. Material presented was gleaned from numerous aircraft flight manuals, program office documents, contractor literature, and the author’s experiences as a Fleet Marine Force CH-53E pilot. Mission systems are presented using readily available equipment in untested configurations using proven tactics and historical experiences. The results and conclusions make plain the need for an organic tanker asset to become part of the future of littoral warfare and the Navy’s vision for future warfighting strategy. v PREFACE All material within this document is Unclassified. Specifications, capabilities, and characteristics of specific aircraft or equipment were obtained from aircraft flight manuals or other public sources. The discussion of proposed usage or capabilities of current or existing aircraft and equipment, as well as analysis, conclusions, and recommendations are presented as the opinions of this author and are not an official position of the United States Department of Defense, the Naval Air Systems Command, or the U. S. Marine Corps. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Sea Power 21........................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 The Expeditionary Strike Group Needs an Organic Tanker Asset......... 5 1.1.3 An Organic Tanker Solution for the Expeditionary Strike Group.......... 5 1.2 USMC Heavy Lift Replacement Program....................................................... 6 1.2.1 The HLR Helicopter ............................................................................... 7 1.2.2 The Acquisition Strategy ........................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Program Status...................................................................................... 10 SECTION II .................................................................................................................... 11 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & DEVELOPMENT............................................................. 11 2.1 HLR Development......................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 HLR Capabilities .................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Physical Specifications ......................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Performance Specifications .................................................................. 14 2.2 HLR Tanker Specifications and Requirements ............................................. 15 2.2.1 Discussion............................................................................................. 15 2.2.2 Requirements ........................................................................................ 15 2.3 HLR Tanker Technical Proposals................................................................. 22 2.3.1 Aerial Refueling: A Brief History......................................................... 22 2.3.2 Aerial Refueling Store .......................................................................... 24 2.3.3 Aerial Refueling Drogue....................................................................... 24 2.3.4 Internal Fuel Cell .................................................................................. 26 SECTION III................................................................................................................... 28 TACTICAL CAPABILITIES OF THE HLR TANKER ............................................................. 28 3.1 Measuring the Impact of the HLR Tanker .................................................... 28 3.1.1 Forcible Entry from the Sea.................................................................. 29 SECTION IV ................................................................................................................... 34 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 34 4.1 The Way Forward ......................................................................................... 34 SECTION V..................................................................................................................... 36 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Actionable Tasks ........................................................................................... 36 5.1.1 Marine Corps Combat Development Command................................... 36 5.1.2 Program Manager Air 261 .................................................................... 36 REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 37 vii APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 39 VITA................................................................................................................................. 43 viii LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF TANKER CAPABILITIES ............................................................... 17 TABLE 2: ESG AIRCRAFT REFUELING REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 18 TABLE 3: REFUELED COMBAT RADIUS INCREASES BY AIRCRAFT....................................
Recommended publications

  • Beaufort Recognizes Navy Cross Recipient

    Cobra Gold The 2018 Friday, February 16, 2018 Jet Vol. 53, No. 06 Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, S.C. “The noiseStream you hear is the sound of freedom.” 8 beaufort.marines.mil | facebook.com/MCASBeaufort | youtube.com/MCASBeaufort | mcasbetwitter.com/MCASBeaufortSC | Instagram/mcasbeaufort Check out our new website at Thejetstream- PROTECT WHAT YOU’VE EARNED beaufort.com Beaufort recognizes Navy Cross recipient Marines and Sailors salute the headstone of Petty Officer 1st Class William Pinckney while Taps is played at the Beaufort National Cemetery, Feb. 10. The new headstone gives proper recognition to Pinckney’s Navy Cross, the second highest award for valor. Pinckney was awarded the Navy Cross during World War II when he saved the life of an unconscious Sailor after a bomb exploded below the flight deck of their ship. At the time of the award, Pinckney was only the second African American in U.S. Navy history to receive the award. Ultimately, Pinckney was one of four African American Sailors to be awarded the Navy Cross. Story by itus professor at the University of Cpl. Benjamin McDonald South Carolina Beaufort. “After Photos by coordinating with the president Lance Cpl. Christian Moreno of the rotary club, we had a new A new headstone honoring headstone in three weeks. So here Petty Officer 1st Class William we all are today to remember this Pinckney was unveiled at the naval hero.” Beaufort National Cemetery, Feb. Pinckney was awarded the 10. Navy Cross while serving aboard The new headstone gives Petty the USS Enterprise aircraft car- Officer Pinckney appropriate rec- rier north of the Santa Cruz Is- ognition for his Navy Cross, the lands Oct.
  • Osprey Shows Its Mettle V-22 Proves Itself in Combat and Its Critics Wrong on Safety, Survivability, Utility

    Osprey Shows Its Mettle V-22 Proves Itself in Combat and Its Critics Wrong on Safety, Survivability, Utility

    Osprey Shows Its Mettle V-22 proves itself in combat and its critics wrong on safety, survivability, utility By Richard Whittle n October 8, 2007, as the US In October 2007, soon after the MV-22 was declared operational that June, the USS Wasp (LHD-1) transported with VMM-263 to Iraq. (US Navy) Marine Corps was putting the OV-22 Osprey into service in Iraq, into service, the world’s first operational in a 50-50 partnership. The Navy – after a major step after a quarter century of tiltrotor has done the opposite of what decades of disinterest – is now on board politically stormy development that Time and other critics anticipated. The to buy at least 44 Ospreys of its own, and had cost $22 billion and 30 lives lost Osprey has proven itself extraordinarily foreign customers will likely also extend in crashes, the cover of Time magazine safe, survivable under enemy fire that the V-22 production run. Japan has depicted the tiltrotor troop transport might bring down most helicopters, and announced it will buy 17 for its military, casting a shadow in the shape of a more versatile and useful than even the and while politics has put an Israeli graveyard cross. Inside the magazine, an truest of true believers ever imagined. decision to buy six Ospreys on hold, article titled “Flying Shame” said the V-22 In short, the Osprey is now putting its several other countries – South Korea might “kill a lot of Marines” and do “little critics to shame. and the United Arab Emirates, to name of note on the battlefield.” But going For that reason, its popularity is two – are seriously kicking the tires.
  • USMC Beyond Their Current Contract Or Service Obligation

    USMC Beyond Their Current Contract Or Service Obligation

    Implementing Force Integration: Issues and Challenges with DRM-2014-U-007338-Final April 2014 Photo credit: U.S. Marines from 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing listen to a brief as they begin training as part of the Lioness Team on Camp Korean Village, Iraq, July 31, 2006. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by ) Approved for distribution: April 2014 Research Team Leader Marine Corps Manpower Team This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Distribution limited to the Marine Corps. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract Number N00014-11-D-0323. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in DFARS 252.227-7013 and/or DFARS 252.227-7014. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the read- ing or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. Used to identify Classification level Contents Executive summary ............................................................................ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 Background ....................................................................................... 5 Issues .................................................................................................. 7 Data ...................................................................................................
  • An Analysis of the Navy's Amphibious Warfare Ships for Deploying

    An Analysis of the Navy's Amphibious Warfare Ships for Deploying

    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO An Analysis of the Navy’s Amphibious Warfare Ships for Deploying Marines Overseas NOVEMBER 2011 Pub. No. 4172 A CBO STUDY An Analysis of the Navy’s Amphibious Warfare Ships for Deploying Marines Overseas November 2011 The Congress of the United States O Congressional Budget Office Notes Unless otherwise indicated, all years referred to in this study are fiscal years and all dollar amounts are in 2011 dollars. On the cover—top left: the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp and the amphibious transport dock ship USS San Antonio during a training exercise (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communi- cation Specialist 1st Class Arif Patani); top right: sailors aboard the amphibious dock landing ship USS Whidbey Island in the Gulf of Aden (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Rachel L. Leslie); bottom: sailors disembark a landing craft utility assigned to the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp in Virginia Beach, Va. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Paul D. Williams). CBO Preface Today, the U.S. Navy’s fleet numbers 284 ships, including 29 amphibious warfare ships that are designed primarily to carry marines and their equipment into combat but that per- form other missions as well. This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, requested in the report of the Senate Armed Services Committee on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, reviews the size, missions, and use of the Navy’s amphibious warfare ships and related expeditionary forces under the Navy’s 2012 shipbuilding plan.
  • Olwell-Chapter IX

    Olwell-Chapter IX

    IX. CURRENT ARCHITECTURE A. INTRODUCTION The Current architecture of the USMC Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) is a Combined Arms and self-sustaining task-organized force, commonly a MEB within the framework of a Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) establishment. The MEB bridges the gap between the MEU, task-organized to provide a forward deployed presence, and the much larger MEF. The composition of the MEB is scalable and flexible, and varies with changing scenarios and nature of operations. The current architecture introduced here is based on a force structure required for conventional littoral assault scenario designed exclusively for the ExWar studies. With 30 days of sufficient supplies for sustained operations, the MEB is capable of conducting Amphibious Assault Operations and MPF operations. During potential crisis situations, a MEB may be forward deployed afloat for an extended period to provide an immediate combat response. A MEB can operate independently or serve as the advance echelon of a MEF. In essence, the MEB comprises the Command Element (CE), Ground Combat Element (GCE), Aviation Combat Element (ACE), and Combat Service and Support Element (CSSE), operating from amphibious ship platforms operated of the United States Navy. B. STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION A notional MEB structure and organization specific to the ExWar studies have been conceived based on the ideology and concept of operations of the existing USMC MEF doctrines. The “notional” MEB is a tasked organized force designed to respond to a full range of operations. The “notional” MEB size force is about 17,000 men and women. 1. Command Element (CE) The MEB command element is embedded in the MEF command element and identified by line number for training and rapid deployment.
  • Inside This Brief Captain (Dr.) Gurpreet S Khurana

    Inside This Brief Captain (Dr.) Gurpreet S Khurana

    Editorial Team Inside this Brief Captain (Dr.) Gurpreet S Khurana Ms. Richa Klair Maritime Security………………………………p.6 Maritime Forces………………………………..p.13 Address Shipping, Ports and Ocean Economy.….p.21 National Maritime Foundation Marine Enviornment………………………...p.35 Varuna Complex, NH- 8 Geopolitics……………………………………....p.46 Airport Road New Delhi-110 010, India Email: [email protected] Acknowledgement : ‘Making Waves’ is a compilation of maritime news and news analyses drawn from national and international online sources. Drawn directly from original sources, minor editorial amendments are made by specialists on maritime affairs. It is intended for academic research, and not for commercial use. NMF expresses its gratitude to all sources of information, which are cited in this publication. Safeguarding Australia’s Security Interests through closer Pacific ties Royal Navy Commissions First New Offshore Patrol Vessel Maritime and National Security leaders Tout Jones act as essential to National and Homeland Security Keeping up with China's PLAN Getting our maritime security effort right A “New Normal” in the South China Sea? Page 2 of 79 China plans Taiwan Strait live-fire exercises amid tensions India’s ‘mission ready’ naval posture in the Indian Ocean isn’t sustainable India, Korea Coast Guards to hold joint exercise on April 5 Britain inaugurates major naval facility in Bahrain Chinese navy puts on show of force in live-fire South China Sea drills, as US prepares for regional exercises U.S.-Japan maritime forces conduct navigational maneuvers in East China Sea Page 3 of 79 Time to drop Sethu Samudram idea and rebuild ‘Ram Sethu’ China and Vietnam explored almost a decade together for oil.
  • Thunder Chickens Take Osprey To

    Thunder Chickens Take Osprey To

    Fort Worth, Texas November 2007, Issue 20 OOHRAH! Thunder Chickens take Osprey to war The V-22 Osprey is now in service defending our country after a quarter century of research and development – and a great deal of work. Ten MV-22s from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263 (VMM-263) arrived in Iraq in early October. Known as the “Thunder Chickens,” they are stationed at Al Asad Air Base west of Baghdad. “It has been a long time coming,” said Art Gravley, the chief Bell engineer for the V-22. “With all the different problems we’ve had in the program in terms of threats of cancellation and accidents, it’s such a satisfying thing to get to this point.” The deployment means a great deal to those who have had their hands in the tiltrotor, many of them for years. For Bell, creating the Osprey is a team effort. Large sections of the aircraft, particularly the wings, are constructed at the Advanced TOP: Marines of VMM-263 gather in front of an Osprey at Al Asad Air Base, Iraq. Marine Corps photo Composite Center (ACC) in Hurst. ABOVE: Marines attached to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 263 board an MV-22 Osprey on the The rotors that keep it aloft are made flight deck of the USS Wasp as they prepare to transit to their final operational destination in Iraq. This at the Rotor Systems Center (RSC). marks the first combat deployment of the Osprey.U.S. Navy photo The gears and transmissions that make it all possible come to life at that we could help the guys over there fighting,” officer, who called it “pretty cool.” the Drive Systems Center (DSC) he said.
  • George Prince Kaumuali'i, the Forgotten Prince

    George Prince Kaumuali'i, the Forgotten Prince

    DOUGLAS WARNE George Prince Kaumuali'i, the Forgotten Prince CATHERINE STAUDER provides considerable historical data on George Prince Kaumuali'i, the first born son of King Kaumuali'i, the last king to rule over the islands of Kaua'i and Ni'ihau.1 She discussed his military record and reached the conclusion that the royal prince and his missionary benefactors were less than honest in reporting his exploits in the U.S. Navy during the war of 1812. However, additional material gleaned from military and secular records indicates George Prince Kaumuali'i may not have been such a lying rascal after all. The purpose of this article is to revisit the period in question, and consider some other documentation which has come to light that indicates that the Prince probably was indeed wounded in combat during the war of 1812, but the particular sea battle cited in the religious press is in error. A brief chronology of George's activities based upon Stauder's arti- cle follows: Jan. 1804 to July 1805: George left the island of Kaua'i at the age of four aboard the Brig Hazard, an American trading vessel, under care of Captain James Rowan. His original Hawaiian name was Hume- hume, but his father, King Kaumuali'i, suggested he be called George (after King George of England) when he went abroad. The lad was sent off alone by his father to obtain an education in America. The ship sailed first to the Northwest Coast of America, then back across the Pacific to China, the Indian Ocean, around Africa arriving in Providence, Rhode Island eighteen months after leaving Kaua'i.
  • USS MAKIN ISLAND Amphibious Ready Group/ 11Th Marine Expeditionary Unit (ARG/MEU) 22Nd Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference

    USS MAKIN ISLAND Amphibious Ready Group/ 11Th Marine Expeditionary Unit (ARG/MEU) 22Nd Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference

    UNCLASSIFIED USS MAKIN ISLAND Amphibious Ready Group/ 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (ARG/MEU) 22nd Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference CAPT Michael Crary 24 Oct 2017 Overall Classification of this brief is: UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED Agenda • ARG/MEU Task Organization • Executive Overview • Pre-Deployment Training Program Overview • Operational Discussion • Recommendations UNCLASSIFIED 2 UNCLASSIFIED Task Organization Supported / Supporting Command Relationship Amphibious Squadron Five 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit PHIBRON 5 11th MEU CAPT Michael Crary Col Clay Tipton CPR5 / ARG Personnel: VMM 163 (REIN) 1, 947 Marines & Sailors (Aviation Combat Element) LtCol Christopher Browning LHD 8 MAKIN ISLAND CAPT Mark Melson 11th MEU Personnel: Battalion Landing Team 1/4 2,460 Marines & Sailors (Ground Combat Element) LtCol Matthew Lundgren LPD 25 SOMERSET CAPT Darren Glaser Combat Logistics Battalion 11 (Logistics Combat Element) LSD 45 COMSTOCK LtCol Patrick Reynolds CDR Bradley Coletti Tactical Air Fleet Naval Assault Assault Beach Helicopter Control Surgical Beach Craft Unit Craft Unit Master Unit Sea Combat Squadron Team Group Five One One Two One 11 Five One 3 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Executive Overview • MAKIN ISLAND Amphibious Ready Group (MKIARG) / 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (11th MEU) deployed Oct 2015 – May 2017 to the Pacific Command (PACOM), Central Command (CENTCOM), and Africa Command (AFRICOM) Areas of Responsibility (AoR). • Deployed for (214) days, of which the ARG/MEU operated (82) days in an Aggregated configuration, (118) days in a Split configuration, and (14) days in a Disaggregated configuration. • Provided forward presence and deterrence in the PACOM AoR. In CENTCOM, ARG/MEU was postured mostly in the Gulf of Aden, supporting maritime trade and sea lines of communication.
  • MEU2: the Marine Expeditionary Unit Smartbook, Second Edition

    MEU2: the Marine Expeditionary Unit Smartbook, Second Edition

    (Sample Only) Find this and other SMARTbooks at www.TheLightningPress.com thelightningpress.com SMARTBOOKMEU2 Second Edition Mission & Organization Staff Functions Mission Planning Mission Essential Tasks Standing Mission Briefs MEU Liaison & Survey Elements Appendices & Reference Acronyms Sample & Glossary the MARINE Expeditionary Unit Guide to Battle Staff Operations & the Rapid Response Planning Process The Lightning Press Norman M Wade (Sample Only) Find this and other SMARTbooks at www.TheLightningPress.com thelightningpress.com SMARTBOOKMEU2 Second Edition Sample the MARINE Expeditionary Unit Guide to Battle Staff Operations & the Rapid Response Planning Process The Lightning Press Norman M Wade (Sample Only) Find this and other SMARTbooks at www.TheLightningPress.com The Lightning Press 2227 Arrowhead Blvd. Lakeland, FL 33813 24-hour Voicemail/Fax/Order: 1-800-997-8827 E-mail: [email protected] www.TheLightningPress.com The Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) SMARTbook, 2nd Ed. Guide to Battle Staff Operations & the Rapid Response Planning Process SECOND PRINTING. This is the 2nd printing of the MEU SMARTbook (1st printing ISBN 978-1-935886-18-1), featuring updated material along with updated binding with spine in place of the original plastic-comb binding. Copyright © 2015 Norman M. Wade ISBN: 978-1-935886-68-6 Special recognition goes to the command, staff and Marines of the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit. Thank you for what you and other servicemembers do for our Nation each and everyday. Hooah! All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or other means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing by the publisher.
  • Marine Corps Rotary Wing Operations

    Marine Corps Rotary Wing Operations

    The Philadelphia Chapter of the American Helicopter Society & the Delaware Valley Chapter of the Army Aviation Association of America proudly presents a DINNER MEETING Tuesday, November 13 th, 2012 Program: Marine Corps Rotary Wing Operations Speaker: Col Jeffrey K. Mosher, HQMC Rotary Wing BhChifBranch Chief Sponsor: Place: D’Ignazio’s Towne House Restaurant, 117 Veterans Square, Media, PA 19063 Time: Cocktails - 5:30 pm, Dinner - 6:30 pm, Presentation - 7:15 pm Menu: Roast Prime Rib, Chicken Breast, Lobster Ravioli, or Vegetarian Dish Registration: Deadline Noon Monday, November 12th Please! Members $25 Member + Spouse $45 GfAHSMbGuests of AHS Members $30 Non-Members $35 Student Members $15 Reservations:email: [email protected] Phone: 610-522-4973 Please provide [1] first & last name, [2] menu selection, and [3] registration type. If you need to cancel your reservation please do so by 10 AM. http://www.vtol.org http://www.ahsphillypa.org About our speaker: Col Jeffrey K. Mosher: Born in S. Weymouth, MA, Colonel Mosher graduated from Silver Lake Regional High School in June 1982. He entered the United States Naval Academy in July of 1982 and was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the United States Marine Corps in May of 1986. He graduated from The Basic School in Quantico, Virginia in December of 1986 and reported to Naval Air Station, Pensacola for training as a naval aviator in March of 1987. He earned his wings in June of 1988 and reported to HMT-204 aboard MCAS New River, NC for training as a CH-46 pilot. He subsequently served in HMM-365 as the Training Officer and Flight Line Officer where he participated in numerous operations in the Mediterranean theater and Operation Desert Shield, Operation Desert Storm, and Operation Eastern Exit.
  • Usmc Aviation “Advancing and Sustaining Warfighting Capabilities”

    Usmc Aviation “Advancing and Sustaining Warfighting Capabilities”

    USMC AVIATION “ADVANCING AND SUSTAINING WARFIGHTING CAPABILITIES” LtCol Jack Abate HQMC ASL Deputy Commandant for Aviation (DC/A) “Assists CMC in planning and coordinating staff activities on all matters related to Organization Equipment Manpower Training Support of Marine Corps aviation units and installations; advises the CMC on systems acquisition and Joint matters related to aviation; DC / AVN ensures Marine Corps aviation supports Expeditionary Maneuver From the Sea AND is AP AS aligned with the overall Naval Aviation Program.” Division Division Plans, Policies, and Systems and Requirements Support DC/A runs Marine Aviation APX Slide: 2 HQMC Aviation Organizational Chart CMC “The Hallway” Pentagon DCA SES ADCA (Vacant) APP APW ASL ASM APX AAB APP‐2 AVIATION AVN FAMILY OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS & TACAIR FACILITIES MANPOWER SYSTEMS TTF FUNCTIONS BUDGET APP‐3 ASSAULT AVIATION AVIATION GROUND PLANS & HQMC ATCO SECURITY SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT POLICY APP‐4 COMMAND & SYSTEMS AVNLOG AIRCREW FUTURE PLANS CONTROL (TACC, INTEGRATION INFO SYSTEMS PROGRAMS AND TTF TAOC, DASC, ATC) STRATEGIC AVIATION SUPPLY, ORDNANCE & AVIONICS PLANS Advise and represent the DCA on all aviation‐related programs Slide: 3 Current Operational Commitments OEF MEU (31st, 22nd , 13th) UDP TAI/Fwd Deployed (det) (det) (det) (det) (det) 4 CH‐53E (det) (det) (det) CJTF‐HOA Squadrons supporting deployments (det) (det) (det) = 23 (37%) OEF MEU (15th* , 11th) UDP TAI/Fwd Deployed (det) (det) (det) (det) (det) (det) (det) Squadrons in Work‐Up Total Deployed or Next to